Idk what he think is fast, but 0-60 with 7 seconds may not be fast now but when he show 10+ years old cars with that speed they actually were fast at a time... maybe he have some complex 😀
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 it is, but new sport cars are doing low 4s nowdays, so I wanted to compare it with them, for me is quick anything under 10 seconds 😀
Late gen C3s were shit (understandably so; they were born in the middle of the Great Depression, so their V8s had 2 b neutered), but early gen C3s were really good
4:52 Wha- Dude, You think the Cayenne is slow? That thing as a SUV does 0-60mph in 4.0 secs (According to the trim level you showed.) Oh, and not to mention The Juke, Veloster, Forte, Speed3, CRZ, Dart are not known to be fast cars. Plus, The c3 is almost reaching the 70 years mark.
@@sk1dzzz608 i get what he means, when that car was new, C3 from 74 onwards it looked fast but was not ,same with 77 Trans Am it only 180hp but looked fast
He also put the 2nd ugliest looking scion tc I have ever seen, if he had put a picture of a stock one, or even mentioned the TRD package ones like the release series 10 which is gorgeous
Exactly! The Japanese cars were built with engines that suited efficiency, but built to withstand more power. I'm not a big tuner guy, but I'm not going to dog on good engineering with potential
@@CaptainFALKEN most of them are purposely detuned and watered-down from factory to abide with laws and regulations which is why they are so legendary in the aftermarket
most of the cars shown dont look fast, but rather sporty. and for european standards they are pretty fast, considering most cars here have like a 1.3l engine with 80hp
American kids only care about drag racing, the Grand Cherokee failed moose test and yet they still put a supercharge V8 on that platform and call it trackhawk......
As a Honda CRZ owner.....yeah, it's pretty slow. But it's very fun to drive in the mountains honestly. The thing was never meant to drive fast in a straight line, but really fun in the twisties.
Exactly, it rides smooth and handles beautifully and absolutely sips gas. And you can turbo them to 200+ hp pretty easily, which in a car that small and light is more than enough.
Dude has over looked a lot. The tiburon can be had with a 2.7 liter v6 lol, the veloster has a turbo version in that same year range he showed lol. The Forte he showed wasn't even a Forte but the stinger gt.
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 I'm at 5-6k with absolutely no trans issues at all. Constant brake-boost laucnhes, brake-stand burnouts and thrashing. Check your facts asshat.
As for the C3 Corvette being slow, yes in part only because the c3 started in 1968, and from 68 to 71 there were serious performance monsters in the ranks, L88 and L72 427's weren't to be messed with and the LS5 454 and LT1 350's were serious performance engine in those Corvettes.
That's what I was going to say, minus the knowledge of the engines haha. How can anyone knock the C3 for being slow when it is an old car? During its time, it was very fast. Picking it for this list does not make sense at all.
I like how the Kia Forte is clearly a Kia stinger and the fact they didn't even talk about the Veloster N which is faster than the base model.... SMH didn't even wanna watch the rest after the first 2 cars
My guy did you actually just grab the base models and use that to shit on all of the models? Because both the merc slk and the cayenne are grossly misrepresented. Also, "Kia forte" huh? is this entire channel just a cash grab then?
First off, I love how you’ve included shitbox SUVs the definition of lemons. And not to mention, most of the other cars you’ve added like the Forte (aka Kia Stinger) also comes as a Turbocharged V6, slap a tune on it, and it’s as fast as an FG Falcon F6.
@Bossgaming 1031 of course u cant, u can get it at around 4.3-4.2. But hey at least you r not paying double the price for badge. New m3 does it in same time and base price around 80k lol. Tuned kia for 55 vs new m3. Lol mate i dont think badge is worth it. Plus all of the maintenance bmw is famous for. And with all that price dropping in few yrs u lost 20-30k. But yeah go ahead buy badge...
@Bossgaming 1031 FBO Stingers are getting to 60 in the 3s range. Mid 3s with a TCU tune. And they're starting to hit 10s in the 1/4 on the stock turbo.
Half the cars in here weren't built to be fast but rather dependable daily drivers, and as far as the c3 corvette goes only the later model ones were slow because of the emissions laws.
Excuse me, I like my Hyundai veloster turbo lol. It might not be ridiculously fast, but with the turbo and some mods im planning on doing, it's an extremely fun car. It is my first car actually and really happy I got it (Oh and the turbo can do 0-60 in 6.9 sec)
Solution to make Celica fast: swap the engine with a lotus 2-Eleven supercharged that will get you like 290 HP they both have the same engine which is called: 2ZZ-GE if you get a celica with a 2zz-ge
Hell yea! He forgot to mention the late 80's celicas, like the All-Trac that comes stock AWD with the boosted 3SGTE. They are definitely not slow for 80's. Shit they aren't slow considering early 2000s shit.
@@babyTOY-YODA777 That's cause those were rally homologation cars. Like the GR Yaris is, they didn't have any business being as cool as they were, but toyota did that for us lol.
Bruh the C3 started in the 70's when there was an oil crisis and the emissions regulations started chevy tried their best to put a v8 in it but they couldn't do much with it cause of the government
The C3 started in ‘68 and from ‘68-‘72 the top trim levels produced over 400hp (425-490). Those Vettesruled the roads for 30 years. They didn’t build cars as fast until the 90’s.
The C3 started a little before that and a few of them came with the famed L88. A 427 cu in cast iron block aluminum head pushrod V8 making by 430 horsepower (Chevy underrated it because it actually made about 550 at the crank )
says scion is below average scion having *massive* amount of customization you were able to do to your cars off the floor such as subs, wheels, exhaust, etc
Kia Stinger is not a Forte, and has up to 365hp TT V6 (sadly only paired with an automatic) and is quite quick. Many of the other cars listed here have better versions like the Veloster N, and MR2 which had an available turbo version.
An early 80s C3 Corvette was fast for its time, don't expect it to be just as fast as a modern C7 Z06 now. Not to mention most DeLoreans came with the 5 speed manual which sort of helped with acceleration, though not really much. 3 speeds weren't common for the DMC12.
@@trelltheguy I love snore like a straight-piped-exhaust motor, sleep like an anchor 2,000 feet into the ocean cars. Laugh your ass off until those cars scream and burn rubber right past you. Or they do wheelies. Either one.
All cars have a class to distinguish. and there are certain rules about restrictions in some countries. The thing to note is that not all cars are made for speed. For example comfort, luxury, sophistication and many others
So there are 3 versions of the MR2, the one mentioned was the Mk3 (MRS or Spyder) but the one showed was the MK2 which was one of the best tuner cars. Could even get it from the factory with a turbo V6 sooooo yea
Lol he confused the MR2 with the later gen MRS. Also the stinger…. Half of these cars have much faster options as well. Like the c3, the cayenne turbo, etc etc.
Could be worse we once had a 1984 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Sure it had a 360 cubic inch V8 but it was only 144 HP. It was also slow as heck. You would think something with a Chrysler V8 would be really quick but I guess there are exceptions. It had a lot of room and all that stuff but it would not get out of its own way.
Mitsubishi Lancer , where did you get GT from ? Also Mitsubishi eclipse GS maybe but GST front wheel drive turbo and GSX as all wheel turbo were pretty quick in early 2000s late 90s at that time
2nd generation mr2 never came with a 1.8 L engine. There was the 3sgte which is a 2.0T and the 5SFE which was a 2.2 N/A. The car also never had a 6 speed option. The 3sgte also came with 200bhp.
Sorry. Nobody looks at a Juke and says, wow that looks fast! Like nobody. Only car nerds know about the Nismo version but we're still like, but why? A Juke does not look fast
Bruh that Kia forte you showed us is actually a Kia stinger gt with a body kit! And the porsche cayenne you showed us was the Cayenne Turbo GT which has 630 horsepower, 0-60 in that beast is almost sub 3 seconds.
Why are you showing a stinger instead of a forte?
yes .. that's a misconception 😓
I know that’s an singer gt and those are kind fast
Clearly he doesn’t know cars much
Thank you.
@@nlouisf he don’t
Who tf tought a juke looked fast
Looks aggressive and sporty and there is a rare GTR variant but yeah it's a shitty slow car
I’m saying😂🤣😂
Yo mom
Well, stupid people thinks so
Guess I'm stupid dumb azz
This is a joke💀 dude does not know what he’s saying at ALL
Fr
Hahaha rly this dude is craizy
Ur mad cuz u didn't do ur research
@@jakearoni124_9 you saying the guy who showed a kia stinger instead of forte did any research??
@@jakearoni124_9 ur prob a kid and don't know anything about cars
You are trying too hard to churn out content bro.
I agree
Yup
Yup 2
This whole list is just CAP
I couldn't agree more
I dontthink a 155 mph supra is fast
But the Fisker Karma is very slow
Yo this man put the corvette c3 which came out in 1967 and called it slow bruh 😐
@@Yes-qj4bi yes but it is unique
I think this dude expects every single car to make around 1000HP
Idk what he think is fast, but 0-60 with 7 seconds may not be fast now but when he show 10+ years old cars with that speed they actually were fast at a time... maybe he have some complex 😀
@@jurajgalica7490 7 seconds today is still quick
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 it is, but new sport cars are doing low 4s nowdays, so I wanted to compare it with them, for me is quick anything under 10 seconds 😀
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 my cla is 4
I know right
All he cares about is speed
Not every car is built to be a rocket
you put a C3 in here? the cars fucking 60 years old...9 second 0-60 is pretty damn good for 1967...
No no it's not not at all
Exactly and lot of the cars mention are tuners and really shine in the aftermarket
@@boogeymana6 ya your right
Late gen C3s were shit (understandably so; they were born in the middle of the Great Depression, so their V8s had 2 b neutered), but early gen C3s were really good
The early c3 were fast some came with a 454ci V8 that was ruthless. The late c3 when the government stepped in? Yes
Talks about Kia Forte but shows the Kia Stinger.
maybe cuz kia forte was so bad he didnt want to show it ?
That piece of crap Stinger ain't fast
@@America1st69 still better than the forte tho
Stinger gt has a 0-60 under 5 sec still not bad
@@America1st69 it's comperable to brand new BMWs in terms of pure performance numbers.
Bruh, that's a Stinger not a Forte. And those are quick with the AWD GTs doing 0-60 in 4.4 seconds and they make between 320 and 350 hp at the wheels.
At the crank* and 4.7
@@en_noah4615 no, 320-350 at the wheels, and 4.4 for AWD.
@@en_noah4615 365 bhp RWD and AWd. RWD 331 WHP and AWD 320 WHP. AWD 0-60 4.7-4.9 RWD 0-60 4.6-4.8 0-60. RWD Curb Weight 3829lbs AWD Curb weight 4023 lbs. Still pretty quick nonetheless
@@spartanwk2103 bro I litterally provided a link proving it only makes 300 wheel but ok
@@en_noah4615 what link? LMAO.
Bruh half these cars can be optioned with more powerful engines
Shut up
@@pratikabhi okay sorry
but hes right it just depends on what you want on a tight budget cornering or speed
Yeah like the very first car can be speced with the 2L turbo that makes like 280hp or something like that, changes the 0-60 to about 5 seconds lmao
The eclipse is the only fast one I saw in it
4:52 Wha- Dude, You think the Cayenne is slow? That thing as a SUV does 0-60mph in 4.0 secs (According to the trim level you showed.) Oh, and not to mention The Juke, Veloster, Forte, Speed3, CRZ, Dart are not known to be fast cars. Plus, The c3 is almost reaching the 70 years mark.
Some do it in the low 3 seconds
@Ian MullingsTrue.
@Ian Mullings the nismo one?
@Ian Mullings the juke r
I remember hearing the Cayenne is fast as fuck, imagine pulling up to one thinking it was slow 🤣
The corvette c3 is slow? That’s like bragging that you beat your grandpa in a foot race.
you might win the foot race but grandpa is probably gonna win the human race lol
I've actually heard that comparison before...
I know right
It makes no sense to include a car that is literally from the 60s and 70s in a list if "slow cars" that can easily be tuned to be fast
@@sk1dzzz608 i get what he means, when that car was new, C3 from 74 onwards it looked fast but was not ,same with 77 Trans Am it only 180hp but looked fast
@@gmain1977 The older c3 'vette were faster.
Some oil crisis or something like that in America back in the 70s
Cars had to be slower in 1974
I stopped watching after you put a Kia stinger GT on there as a Kia forte lol 😂🤣🤦♂️
He also put the 2nd ugliest looking scion tc I have ever seen, if he had put a picture of a stock one, or even mentioned the TRD package ones like the release series 10 which is gorgeous
Bro fr, and he had the Audacity to say people who think otherwise sTuPid
Same
who tf thinks nissan juke is fast lol
Guys who actually put a GTR engine 😉
there are only 6 of these juke R so good luck finding one
Most of these cars really shine in the aftermarket. And some of these cars are old and actually considered pretty quick in their day
Exactly! The Japanese cars were built with engines that suited efficiency, but built to withstand more power.
I'm not a big tuner guy, but I'm not going to dog on good engineering with potential
@@ryanmckenna5254 Yeah, I thought that too when i saw the toyota mr2.
Either they're good stock OR NOT. Aftermarket is just a trend.
@@ryanmckenna5254 No, just Toyota was built to last, except the mr2. Everything else suffer greatly.
@@CaptainFALKEN most of them are purposely detuned and watered-down from factory to abide with laws and regulations which is why they are so legendary in the aftermarket
most of the cars shown dont look fast, but rather sporty. and for european standards they are pretty fast, considering most cars here have like a 1.3l engine with 80hp
The european sport cars are faster than any muscle car, the only american fast cars are the corvette and the ford gt
@@danielesavino2619 here you can consider a 2008 Mazda6 a sport sedan already with its 180hp
@@izu1525 the mazda is japanese and it's anyway faster then a muscle car
@@danielesavino2619 it’s not really faster
At least last time I checked a Mazda 6 is not faster than a dodge demon in a straight line
@@danielesavino2619 its literally a bone stock inline 4, 2.5l dohc engine making 170 or so hp
0-60 isnt everything, let's put it this way, a miatas is faster through the corners than a dodge demon.
@@nailinyourmom ok and?
American kids only care about drag racing, the Grand Cherokee failed moose test and yet they still put a supercharge V8 on that platform and call it trackhawk......
Yeah..... Bad example there buddy
@@a1160757 no
yes agree
As a Honda CRZ owner.....yeah, it's pretty slow. But it's very fun to drive in the mountains honestly. The thing was never meant to drive fast in a straight line, but really fun in the twisties.
Exactly, it rides smooth and handles beautifully and absolutely sips gas. And you can turbo them to 200+ hp pretty easily, which in a car that small and light is more than enough.
Exactly
Not All cars are meant to be like dodge demons on a drag strip
(Not All built for speed like a dodge demon)
Like the BRZ/ gt86 twins not fast in a straight line but corners like a POrsche. BTW I own a BRZ and a brother of mine owns an FRS.
The C3 model spanned 15 years. While you did show a later model that was bloated, smog choked and slow, the earliest models were monsters.
Funny how they did not mention the MR2 model with the 2.0 turbo.
Thats what I was thinking 😂
yeah that’s got like 300hp and does 0-60 in like 5 seconds
Dude has over looked a lot. The tiburon can be had with a 2.7 liter v6 lol, the veloster has a turbo version in that same year range he showed lol. The Forte he showed wasn't even a Forte but the stinger gt.
@@JJsGA The tiburon 2.7l only had a little over 160hp. That car was never fast.
Yea he just mentioned the 2nd gen MR2 with the mythical 1.8 liter hahaha
Who said the Dodge Dart looks fast?
It could
no one.
Who said the Nissan SUV looks fast?😂😂this dude doesn't know crap about cars. Better shut down his channel
People who think it's a charger
maybe he take asphalt 8 memes too seriously, there is a meme that says "all hail king dart" and "dart is faster than jesko"
But the Hyundai Veloster has an N version if I'm not mistaken with a total power of around 275 HP
I thought I was trippin
It’s also tuned by the former head of BMW M division.
@@Zeiss120 yeah
But, The N model is newer.
@@Danny103 don't forget that your Mustang is fat as hell, and Veloster is a light hatch...
That was no Forte, that was a Stinger. A very fast underrated car.
And has to replace the Trans every 3000 miles
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 at 5k with no trans issues 😂 so you’ve been debunked
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 I'm at 5-6k with absolutely no trans issues at all. Constant brake-boost laucnhes, brake-stand burnouts and thrashing. Check your facts asshat.
@@jonathanparkhurst1080 50k with NO ISSUES.......
I considered this car. I'd like it in manual T tho
The forte is actually a Stinger
like bruh 😭
the fact that the dart made the list and the frs didn’t is astonishing
A lot of these cars no one ever thought they were fast..
Frs/Brz looks fast;)
@@aceshadowins1310 I have a Tc and it has a faster 0-60 than a BRZ (I refuse to call it anything but a subaru)
Bruh the one car had 403 HP. I looked it up
@@blakebarnes2350 what car is it?
@@blakebarnes2350 he’s showing the lower engine options and trims of these cars that’s why
Sounds like ur slow af dude
As for the C3 Corvette being slow, yes in part only because the c3 started in 1968, and from 68 to 71 there were serious performance monsters in the ranks, L88 and L72 427's weren't to be messed with and the LS5 454 and LT1 350's were serious performance engine in those Corvettes.
That's what I was going to say, minus the knowledge of the engines haha. How can anyone knock the C3 for being slow when it is an old car? During its time, it was very fast. Picking it for this list does not make sense at all.
I drove a 69 stingray in my opinion is was scary fast and stock..
The mr2 was faster than the nsx and supra on the 1/4 mile😂
yeah and also from 1983
No it's not unless you blow the shit out of it.
@@robertsullivan4773 it is have you ever seen the mr2 turbo?
@@joshsuelto a stock MR2 Turbo does not do 13s from factory
@@gmain1977 it does search up mr2 turbo vs nsx
I like how the Kia Forte is clearly a Kia stinger and the fact they didn't even talk about the Veloster N which is faster than the base model.... SMH didn't even wanna watch the rest after the first 2 cars
if you want a fast car,something that fast enough, then the only option was riding an ambulance when you needed to go to the hospital.
My guy did you actually just grab the base models and use that to shit on all of the models? Because both the merc slk and the cayenne are grossly misrepresented. Also, "Kia forte" huh?
is this entire channel just a cash grab then?
im subbed to u , love ur reddit vids :D
First off, I love how you’ve included shitbox SUVs the definition of lemons. And not to mention, most of the other cars you’ve added like the Forte (aka Kia Stinger) also comes as a Turbocharged V6, slap a tune on it, and it’s as fast as an FG Falcon F6.
KIA Hyundai... SMH. Wannabe
@Bossgaming 1031 why wouldn't he?
@Bossgaming 1031 yeah its JUST A KIA. Say that when u get gapped by A KIA in ur m3 or any boring vw group 60k+ car.
@Bossgaming 1031 of course u cant, u can get it at around 4.3-4.2. But hey at least you r not paying double the price for badge. New m3 does it in same time and base price around 80k lol. Tuned kia for 55 vs new m3. Lol mate i dont think badge is worth it. Plus all of the maintenance bmw is famous for. And with all that price dropping in few yrs u lost 20-30k. But yeah go ahead buy badge...
@Bossgaming 1031 FBO Stingers are getting to 60 in the 3s range. Mid 3s with a TCU tune. And they're starting to hit 10s in the 1/4 on the stock turbo.
Half the cars in here weren't built to be fast but rather dependable daily drivers, and as far as the c3 corvette goes only the later model ones were slow because of the emissions laws.
"had Hyundai invested on the Forte.." had u researched what a Forte looks like ... 😅
This dude is joke😂mf pulled up a stinger and said (confused it with a forte) it was slow and of all cars a *juke*
Best trolling car channel on YT. I can't stop laughing. Subscribed.
Why are you showing old Azz sports cars. Mr2 is a classic and a beast with little modifications done to it.
umm 180 hp is good for naturally aspirated engines btw. If it was turbo expect 250 hp stock but either way its fuel efficient for good performance
That wasn't a Kia forte,that is a Kia stinger
Excuse me, I like my Hyundai veloster turbo lol. It might not be ridiculously fast, but with the turbo and some mods im planning on doing, it's an extremely fun car. It is my first car actually and really happy I got it (Oh and the turbo can do 0-60 in 6.9 sec)
Solution to make Celica fast: swap the engine with a lotus 2-Eleven supercharged that will get you like 290 HP they both have the same engine which is called: 2ZZ-GE if you get a celica with a 2zz-ge
I know some 1ZZ-GE celicas that are pretty quick when turbocharged with only 8psi makes a decent 199 whp, well tuned they can reach 230hp.
Hell yea! He forgot to mention the late 80's celicas, like the All-Trac that comes stock AWD with the boosted 3SGTE. They are definitely not slow for 80's. Shit they aren't slow considering early 2000s shit.
@@babyTOY-YODA777 That's cause those were rally homologation cars. Like the GR Yaris is, they didn't have any business being as cool as they were, but toyota did that for us lol.
This CZcamsr taking about Toyotas "impossible to modify"
There are 2ZZ engines running around over 400hp now, but it DID take the aftermarket quite a long time to get there.
Bruh the C3 started in the 70's when there was an oil crisis and the emissions regulations started chevy tried their best to put a v8 in it but they couldn't do much with it cause of the government
The C3 started in ‘68 and from ‘68-‘72 the top trim levels produced over 400hp (425-490). Those Vettesruled the roads for 30 years. They didn’t build cars as fast until the 90’s.
The C3 started a little before that and a few of them came with the famed L88. A 427 cu in cast iron block aluminum head pushrod V8 making by 430 horsepower (Chevy underrated it because it actually made about 550 at the crank )
All depends on how you drive them. Drive like a maniac at all times
*7 FAST cars STUPID people THINK ARE SLOW*
I love midsize mounted engines
2:59 i love how he says that 1.8l is slow yet a formula 1 engine from all 4 manufactures are 1.6l turbo hybrids
And f1s are v6s
idc if the car is slow i could upgrade like put a new turbo or engine swap :/
Mazda 6 Slowest fast looking car?make that make sense it's don't really look too sporty
Mr2 had questionable styling?😵
For real! That car was one of the most beautiful real world production cars ever made.
Bruh, the covette c3 doesn’t fit in .back in it’s day. It was very fast. When you are comparing a old car to a new car, it doesn’t fit in
Do any body notice it was not a forte was a stinger haha
Literally no one has looked at a juke and thought it was fast
No mention of BRZ/86/FR-S?
Everyone already knows they're slow
The cayenne turbo does a 0-60 of 3.1 😂
The V6 Hyundai Tiburons were pretty quick back in the day 2003- 2008, they hung with stock wrxs all day long.
Lol this shit is funny asf 🤣
I honestly thought the 86/brz/frs was gonna make this list
Lmao so true!! He probably owns one do he didn’t want to put it on there lol.
says scion is below average
scion having *massive* amount of customization you were able to do to your cars off the floor such as subs, wheels, exhaust, etc
4:21 mid-size mounted engine. this is definitely some college student who just got a civic.
Kia Stinger is not a Forte, and has up to 365hp TT V6 (sadly only paired with an automatic) and is quite quick.
Many of the other cars listed here have better versions like the Veloster N, and MR2 which had an available turbo version.
Sadly?
Not sadly at all
@@sk1dzzz608 Yes it is sad. Automatics are for soccer moms, and wealthy people pretending to be auto enthusiasts.
@@Dolby109 "pretending"?
Yea Right,like you're a real auto enthusiast
@@Dolby109 its sad that people like you actually believe you're right when you say dumb shit like that
The used for the kia forte was the kia stinger, the kia stinger is actually a pretty respectable car but wouldn't want anyone to get them mix up
So the Kia Forte is a stinger now??
Thoughts on the forte gt? My brother has one
the fact he added the delorien ( wich is slow as hell) but not the scion frs/brz/gt86 is just shoking
Imagine trying to sound like you know a lot ab cars and then showing a stinger instead of a forte and how is 0-60 in 4 seconds slow?
09:46 Have you even driven an Eclipse GSX before? That shit pulls hard for a 210hp.
My man expects every car to do a 0-60 in 3 seconds
The Nissan Juke doesn’t even look fast.. wut..
An early 80s C3 Corvette was fast for its time, don't expect it to be just as fast as a modern C7 Z06 now. Not to mention most DeLoreans came with the 5 speed manual which sort of helped with acceleration, though not really much. 3 speeds weren't common for the DMC12.
It depends on what you think is fast. Everyone has a different of fast. 😂
even if stock... i have a 2011 impreza hatch and it feels fast and love it. that car valid tho?
7 Slow cars to tune like a maniac and transform into sleepers
I love sleepers cars 😍
@@trelltheguy I love snore like a straight-piped-exhaust motor, sleep like an anchor 2,000 feet into the ocean cars. Laugh your ass off until those cars scream and burn rubber right past you. Or they do wheelies. Either one.
My favorite sleeper is a 97 Honda accord
No one will change my mind about the MR2, I will always want an SW20🥺
Update : I got a ‘94 SW20 :))
Happy for you man, good stuff.
All cars have a class to distinguish. and there are certain rules about restrictions in some countries. The thing to note is that not all cars are made for speed. For example comfort, luxury, sophistication and many others
"Only a stupid person would think an SLK was fast"
Yeah I thought it was fast.
So there are 3 versions of the MR2, the one mentioned was the Mk3 (MRS or Spyder) but the one showed was the MK2 which was one of the best tuner cars. Could even get it from the factory with a turbo V6 sooooo yea
You obviously have zero knowledge about car classes and what compares with what
Lol he confused the MR2 with the later gen MRS.
Also the stinger….
Half of these cars have much faster options as well. Like the c3, the cayenne turbo, etc etc.
Says forte shows a stinger. Quality right there 👍🏽
The Cayenne goes 186 MPH not 147MPH lol.
the Cayenne Turbo S does 0-60 in ~4 seconds.
He named more then 7 cars !
Or am I the only one who caught on lmaoo
Am I tripping or was there a whole stinger instead of a forte
You’re right it was a stinger
I about died when he said forte, then a stinger pulled up😂
You funny bro 😎 I was rolling during these commentaries
Could be worse we once had a 1984 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Sure it had a 360 cubic inch V8 but it was only 144 HP. It was also slow as heck. You would think something with a Chrysler V8 would be really quick but I guess there are exceptions. It had a lot of room and all that stuff but it would not get out of its own way.
Every car he shows has camber and awkward figment.
Mitsubishi Lancer , where did you get GT from ? Also Mitsubishi eclipse GS maybe but GST front wheel drive turbo and GSX as all wheel turbo were pretty quick in early 2000s late 90s at that time
Thank you! I was thinking the exact samething! Im pretty sure they had same 4g63 engine as the iconic evo’s.
The C3 Corvette was made in the smog motor years , an updated crate motor would solve the problem!
So, you showed a stinger instead of a forte (vastly different cars) and an evo Mitsubishi instead of the GT.
There is ZR1 and ZR2 Version of The C3 Corvette and They all are FAST!
Who the hell thought the Mazda 6 looked fast/was fast ☠️
Its fast for the family car
this guys brain is smoother than the lines on the c3
I think my Honda Corolla C class can pretty quick tho 😳 I have heaps of upforce too
😂😂😂 yeah those Honda Corolla v5's😂😂😂
kia forte dosnt even look fast..
just a normal kia
The GT model looks a little bit fast
@@jacobzanayed I own the Gt and it doesn’t particularly look fast but it does look sporty. That 201 hp is really fun to zip around town with.
@@Dr.Legendd the car does look like a blast to drive
That's a kia stinger lol
I cant take a man who confuses a stinger with a forte seriously
2nd generation mr2 never came with a 1.8 L engine. There was the 3sgte which is a 2.0T and the 5SFE which was a 2.2 N/A. The car also never had a 6 speed option. The 3sgte also came with 200bhp.
the only one that I thought would be faster is the fisker karma
Same
Sorry. Nobody looks at a Juke and says, wow that looks fast! Like nobody. Only car nerds know about the Nismo version but we're still like, but why? A Juke does not look fast
You mean Puke
4g gt eclipses can get up to 300 hp tuned also with adding headers, exhaust, and a cold air intake. All these cars are platforms
Bruh that Kia forte you showed us is actually a Kia stinger gt with a body kit! And the porsche cayenne you showed us was the Cayenne Turbo GT which has 630 horsepower, 0-60 in that beast is almost sub 3 seconds.