Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS Lens Review - Real World and Lab
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2016
- In this Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS Lens Review (bhpho.to/2wrSO8j) I will go over all the critical information and show you what this lens can do in the real world under a variety of conditions. Please feel free to ask questions and comment below as always. Also, be sure to subscribe for my latest Sony camera and lens reviews.
Thanks,
Jay
Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS Lens @ BHPhoto: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product...
Sony A7r @ BHPhoto: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product...
Hoya 72mm UV Haze NXT HMC Filter: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product...
Tamron 70-300mm Lens @ BHPhoto: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product...
SonyAlphaLab - Website: sonyalphalab.com/
SonyAlphaLab - Forums: sonyalphalab.com/forums/forum.php
Forum Photography Challenges: sonyalphalab.com/forums/forumd...
One of the best reviews I’ve seen. Thanks!.
I always come away knowing a little more about photography when watching your videos. Thanks for all the effort you put into making them. I especially like the real world photos and the way you explain what you are doing and then adjust one parameter and show the difference. my favorite line today was "this is just a cool bus". Thanks again for the work.
Thank you very much for the kind comments ;) That bus is pretty cool you must admit... Have a great day,
Jay
Awesome review! Nice and detailed as always! Great shots too :)
Thank you very much John!
Great review, lots of pics to show how good the lens is. Well done!
Thanks for this! Will be getting one tomorrow.
Very useful and informative review Jay. Thank you.
Hey Jay I just want you to know that I am so grateful for all your reviews, you just make my decision much easier & with much much more confidence on what I would get. Thank you! I like that You really keep it real. 👍
Amazing video keep doing reviews like this one
Great review man! I was debating between this and the 70-200 f/4 but I think I'm going to go with the 70-300. Love all the real world shots, they all look fantastic. Also cool you went down to Long Beach, I go to school at CSULB. Again, awesome review.
Thanks Jay, your info is very helpful!
Thank you for the comments ;)
I just bought it! Thanks for the review!!!!
I loved this review!
Would really like to have this lens, great shots btw
Thank you very much!
Great review...... Could you please compare it to the 70-200mm f4
Nice review and beautiful results , even at first the lens not works great the sharpness was bad , but after i updated my camera firmware starts to find the value of this lens but the real magic comes when in some of my cameras is reduce the shooting image size at half .
Great review - this helped me decide what lens to rent for a safari I'm about to go on. Thanks for all the real-world shots and explaining things in clear language! I'm eager to see how this is going to work on my a6300
On the a6300 it's very very fast af and better than expected balance on the body too. Nice lens and good pairing although the 70-200g is still my preference of the two and I use that instead
Thank you for the kind comments and enjoy your safari!!
nice review! Does any one have shots / samples with the macro use? thanks
I have watched so many reviews trying to decide on which Sony telephoto lens but after watching this I will buy the 70-300 . Thank you.
I used this lens with a Sony a6000 shooting jpeg and it’s fantastic!
I love your reviews
Thanks!
Awesome video 👌 do you think this lens would be good for my sony a6500? I would need it for shooting kiteboarding from the coast
Many thanks
great review ! have you tested the AF-C with the lens on other Sony body with PDAF? any thoughts? thank you
Thank you and I have not tested the lens on any other cameras, but it does performs much faster on the A7r II based on the other reviews on youtube. Also, the A7r II focus faster with every lens I have tried, so from that point of view it should certainly be much faster and more accurate with moving subjects in particular.
Very narration, great video - objective - video.
Thank you Kevin ;)
Great Review
Thank you very much!
Thanks a ton for your videos! Super helpful! I just bought the Sony a7iii with the kit lens and the 24mm GM. I'm also looking for a zoom lens, would you recommend the 24-105mm with the 24mm GM? or the 70-300 mm?
I've read a lot of reviews on the 70-300 and not all of them are good. Whereas the 24-105 has excellent reviews all of the internet.
I was in two minds about the 24-70GM or the 24-105G, after reading a few reviews I opted for the 24-105 and haven’t been disappointed. Great lens
Hi Jay, what focus mode and focus area did you use?
Great review. I just recently bought this lens as my first lens with my new Sony A7R iii that I also just bought. And yes Its an amazing lens just like your saying.
Thank you for the comment and I'm really glad the lens is working out well for you ;)
@@Jason_Hermann your welcome and thanks!
Nice review for the 70-300. When are you going to review the 21mm Loxia?
Thanks and I'm not sure just yet about the Loxia, because I have a bunch of AF lenses that are higher priority at the moment ;) I do want to review that lens though!! I really enjoyed the other one....
Hi! Nice video! How would you rate this compared to the 70-200 F/4? I know the F/4 is better in low light with it's bigger aperture but I plan to use telezooms mostly for outdoor motorsports 80% of the time. Thanks in advance for the reply!
Very close, but the f/4 unit constant aperture is capable of focus tracking subjects a little better...
nice review
Thank you very much!
Informative and useful review, thanks! Can you compare the new Sony FE 100-400 with the Canon EF 100-400 ver II shooting with the same Sony FF body, please? (Sharpness @400mm, AF speed, lens based IS/OSS efficiency, and close up image quality @ 1m distance.)
I would love to, but I just don't think I'm going to be able to get all that gear at once... I can tell you for sure, the Sony FE 100-400mm will focus faster on the Sony camera body, no question. Image quality however, will be very close otherwise, because both lenses are killer quality in all areas. It would be hard to tell the difference, even when pixel peeping!! Each lens will have a slight advantage here or there, but again, very hard to tell. Jay
Hi, i was wondering if you know if a sony 75-300mm A-mount lens works well using an LAEA3 adapter on a sony a6000 E-mount camera? My husbamd bought me the lens thinking it was an e-mount and now im stuck with it .. any suggestions on what settings to use the lens on, its very unstabled when i take some photos...
Yes it will work!
Hello, what is the name of this app
Great review! How would this compare to the 70-200 f4? I'm trying to decide between this and the 70-200.
Thanks
Hi Marvin. Both lenses are great and offer great optical quality. The FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS Lens offers better build quality and weather sealing, more manual buttons for easier control, faster autofocus, and a constant f/4 aperture throughout the zoom range. In addition the zooming is all internal, so the lens does not extend when zooming. The 70-300mm has an extra 100mm which is really nice if needed but extendes when zooming. The FE 70-300mm also has a slower max aperture of f/4.5 - 5.6 compared to the constant f/4. I hope that helps? Jay
Jay SonyAlphaLab Hi Jay, thanks for the feedback! If I wanted a little bit more range and not compromise much on quality, would I be better off using a teleconverter with the 70-200?
Thanks,
Marvin
would be nice to see landscape shots , how much in focus ability ! across a long expanse ...long valley . But thanks for a great summary !
Thanks for the reviews; I really find them informative and helpful! Curious on your thoughts on how well the 70-300 mm compares to the Sony FE 24-240 mm lens? I realize the 70-300 mm is a G lens; but I wonder whether the 24-240 might actually be better; given you can zoom out to a wider angle, and being shorter only 60 mm; isn't that much of a difference...any thoughts?
Yes I would like to know as well, as they are the two choices for sony users so a companion video would be good.
Hello and great question guys! The 24-240mm lens is a great option for an all in one solution. My review here: czcams.com/video/4JNYYgrkVR4/video.html The optical quality is very good, but not in the same league as this beast reviewed here. The distortion is more noticeable, the corners are not as sharp, and the color and contrast are not as good. Overall, the 24-240mm is a great option for all-in-one coverage when needed. I would not consider it a killer lens though like this FE 70-300mm unit. So, depending on your needs the 24-240mm lens can totally be a better option, if you need the wide angle coverage and don't want to change lenses often or ever. I hope that helps,
Jay
Hi Jay, thanks for the comments, I have the 24-240mm and agree with what you have said, I tried the 70-300mm recently at a camera show and was really impressed but only got to shot a few photos. Keep up the great videos.
Thank you very much Lee Booth ;) Best of luck!
I need an answer: will this do well filming high school football video at night (stadium lights) on the FX3? Can I use 800 or 12800 in Cone EI mode without grain?
I'm honestly not sure, because that specific use case I would need to test. This lens does not have the fastest aperture, so you would need to use ISO 12800 for sure I would think. Assuming the exposure is on the money you should not have much grain. However if it's under exposed then it will certainly look grainy.
which one is better in sharpness sony 70-200 mm f4 or this one ?
thanks mate appreciate the help. so hard to get ur hands on sony lense to try them out they are like hens teeth haha
nice review man covered all the important stuff 👍
Thanks Mat ;)
Can this be used on the A7R iii? Thanks for the help!
Yes, it is a full frame lens. See here: www.sonyalphalab.com/guides/sony-e-mount-lens-guide/
Great review as usual Jay.
I purchased this lens a month ago with the goal of replacing my FE 70-200mm G OSS for the longer reach. After a couple days of field comparisons with my a7rii I felt that the 70-300 was equal to the 70-200 in general use, but exceeded the latter in zoom macro applications. Yes, I wish the new lens was at least a constant f/4 as the predecessor, but feel the extra 100mm reach is worth the trade off. I also prefer the collar-less and shorter barrel of the 70-300 over the longer 70-200. I find it much easier to carry with a Peak Design Slide shoulder rig and with a Really Right Stuff L-bracket on my a7rii , the new lens is quite stable on a tripod without a collar. The build quality is spectacular as you note, and comparable to the 70-200mm G in that respect.
I've read a couple reviews that complain about extreme softness in the corners, but like you, I have not seen this and very pleased with the cross-frame IQ. I was most surprised with the pleasant bokeh in my images and had not expected this quality in a telephoto zoom. Generally I find this new entry quite worthy of joining my collection of Sony and Zeiss lenses and appreciate your timely "real world" review.
Thanks!
Thank you Robert for the detailed comments and sharing your real world experience as well. I'm glad you have found the results to be as god as I thought they were as well. The bokeh was especially pleasant as you said and I did not expect that level of quality. Intersting points about the shorter lens barrel and the lack of tri-pod collar, and it makes perfect sense as you explained it for your needs! A great lens for sure in my opinion, and would be very happy to add it my collection as well.... Thanks again!
Hello Robert, it is as sharp as the 70-200mm f4 ? thx a lot.
+Hamza Benarafa Yes, I thought so given the side by side evaluations I did. I shot images on both lenses at 70mm and 200mm and found them equal in performance with the 70mm-300mm having superior sharpness with macro zoom images such as flowers, etc. I was so convinced, I sold my 70-200mm G on eBay , if that gives you any indication. Hope that helps! Robert
+Robert Sherrow wow wouldnt expect that. Thats exactly the i formations i was looking for to decide wich one to buy. i think 1 fstop slower is ok for me. Thx again Robert.
I agree the 300 is better than the 200 for long reach macro
I know the video is old, stil hoping you'll answer this question, because your video was the best out there. Which tripod clamp would fit this lense?
I don't know of a clamp that will fit the lens, sorry...
@@Jason_Hermann No problem, thanks anyway! Keep up the good work
hi dear, thank you for your review and i would like to ask you, why always when you mentioned your camera name and model you're saying a7r original? are there non original version in the market? or duplicated? i own one a7r.
I have the A7r, the new model is the A7r II, which has built in sensor stabilization. I wanted to make sure you guys new I was using the older model A7r, or original.... Sorry for the confusion :)
dont think ive ever seen a 300mm zoom lense come out so smooth man watched this a few times everything so smooth. reckon ill go ok at 300 even with the crop factor on the a6000. will let you know when i get my hands on it. ordering tomorrow
Awesome, and be sure to share some pics on the forum if you get the time ;) sonyalphalab.com/forums/forum.php
Hey, I also own the a6000 and am looking to get this lense. Would You let me know how You like the combo?
Hello Jay,
thanks for the great review.
But which lens has the better picture quality? Sony 70-300 or Tamron 70-300?
Does the Tamron focus well on a Sony A7R2? Is the LA-EA3 Adapter the best choice to connect an A7R2 with Tamron?
Regards from Germany(all the best for 2017)
Joerg
Hello Joerg and great question! The Tamron 70-300mm lens I have not used personally, but the "good one" is very close to the Sony in IQ. The LA-EA3 lens adapter would be the one to get with the A7r II I would say ;) Best of luck and same to you for the new year!!
great review! I was hesitating between this one and the 70-200F4 . Is there a big difference of image quality between the 2 lenses ?
No, not much difference in IQ, I would go with the 70-300mm personally for the extra reach :)
Jay SonyAlphaLab yes! That's what I did and I'm very glad of my choice!
Extra reach and macro ability, I would choose the 70-300, too.
Which one better for out and indoor lens FE 70-200 F4 or FE 70-300 F4.5 ? and why? still reconsidering hehe
Great question! The FE 70-200mm f/4 lens would be better for low light indoor photography over the FE 70-300mm Lens. The reason is, the f/4 aperture is faster and constant throughout the entire 70-200mm range. The FE 70-300mm lens has a variable aperture meaning it's f/4.5 at 70mm and f/5.6 at 300mm. So, you do get more range with the 70-300mm lens, but it's "slower" aperture wise, which means it's not as good in low light. Also, the 70-200mm Lens has dual focus motors built in, which makes it significantly faster at focusing for sports shooting in particular if that is what you are planing to do. Both lenses are excellent as far as I'm concerned, but they are different. I hope that helps? Jay
Jay SonyAlphaLab would this be the same as to "low light" with the 70-300 on the Sony a9? Im needing the extra reach.
has anyone tested the corner sharpness on the a6300 / a6000 @ 300mm?
I'm not sure, but it's really good on the full frame cameras, therefore it should be even better on the crop factor A6000 series cameras!
A comparition with the tamron 70300 usd on a7rii?...maybe? :)
I'm wondering that there is no tripod Lens connector ring? The lens is heavier than FE70200f4 and the lens expanded for 300mm...how should it work on a tripod? Maybe you will damage the camera body...or the lens will be so sensitive because the fix point is not balanced...
The camera body is strong enough to support the lens on a tri-pod with little issue. I would not bounce the tri-pod around, but the lens and even my older A7r was able to handle the weight easily. It wasn't flexing or anything like that even at 300mm. It is sensitive to vibration though for sure. A self timer or cable re-lease would be highly recommended with slower shutter speeds. A lens collar would be a nice option to have though in any case. Helps with vibration and clearly takes the load off the camera body as you were saying.
Thanks for the excellent question/ comments,
Jay
+Jay SonyAlphaLab thanks for your answer. But keep in mind that you can the lens for all e-Mount bodies like the old NEX Generation. I asked the German Sony Support...they were also suprised and had no answer...
Yes, I am aware you can use them on all camera bodies and you must use caution on the non full frame camera bodies for sure! I was using the older A7r though and it was pretty darn solid on the tri-pod. On an older Nex-5 or something I would be very careful though for sure, because the body is not as strong as the full frame e-mount cameras in particular as you are saying. Great points and worth noting for sure! Thanks again,
Jay
Good question from DrDuu regarding the weight of this lens on a tripod. I have the 70-300mm G lens and use it on my Sony a7rii with a Really Right Stuff L-bracket and it is very secure on a tripod without a collar. I believe it would also be okay without the bracket, since the a7rii has a magnesium alloy body. I would be concerned using this lens on a Sony a6300 and especially the all plastic a6000 without an L-bracket due to the smaller size. However, the shorter barrel of the 70-300mm over the 70-200 G makes it a much friendlier walking lens off the tripod. Just my thoughts. Good luck!
How would this lens work for football photos - while they will be mostly at night the stadiums are fully lighted.
It will work very well in my opinion with the A7 III or A9 for example, because they have the latest and greatest auto focus technology and are both great in low light. This lens is a little slower on the telephoto end, so you will be pushing some high ISO numbers in order to freeze the action with fast shutter speeds. If the stadium lighting is very good then you should really have great success. Otherwise you are looking at the FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM Lens, which is very expensive, but significantly better for the lower light situations.
hi.. I know I am late but.. for amateur purposes in good light which would you recommend at a a7Rii.
70-300 or 70-200 F4? Many thanks in advance.
I would totally go for the FE 70-300mm Lens when posed with that question! The extra reach is awesome and the lens is cheaper... See here: amzn.to/2ym6f8I
@@Jason_Hermann ordered, thx.
Is there a chance you or someone else here found a third-party collar that fits this lens?
@@dm976 from the UK www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B074372HMV/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
It actually shipped from Germany to me in Britain. HTH
what this lens be good for a concert or wold the Sony 70-200 f2.8 be the better lens ?!?
yes, 70-200mm f/2.8 is a significantly better lens!
Would this work with Sony A77 mark 2 ?
no E-Mount lenses will not work with A-Mount cameras. However, A-Mount lenses can be used on E-Mount cameras via the LA-EA3 or LA-EA4 lens adapter for serious versatility!
Has anyone used this lens for sports? I'm trying to decide this or the 70-200 F4 (the F2.8 is too pricey for me)
Same here its crazy how not many people have done this comparison
@@HeroShotzthe consistent F4 is definitely worth it for sports - get the 70-200. you don't want your exposure changing as they run toward you as the aperture changes. i view something like the 70-300 as a "convenience" lens with such a large range. for getting just one shot here and there at different ranges.
would you still pick the 70-300 over the 70-200f4 today?
Yes I would :)
Hey, Weis. You’re not from Upstate NY are ya?
If you are referring to me, yes I am from upstate NY ;) Jay
Jay SonyAlphaLab Hahaha me too! I was looking up videos for this particular lens for my A7III, and found your video. I saw Weis and was like hey I live like 2 seconds from one. I’m in the Broome County/Binghamton area. Small world.
how do you like capture one?
It's pretty awesome, but my database recently got corrupted and I lost it. Not very happy and switched back to Lightroom about a month ago. It's only $10 a month for Lightroom and Photoshop, so I bit the bullet and signed up.
Thanks Jay! I like your videos!
Hi I looking to buy a telephoto for the Sony A7 II , which one would you recommend? Sony 70-200mm G, sony fe 70-300mm or the tamron 70-300 with the La-ea4 adapter?
It really depends on your specific needs and, If money was not object, then I would recommend this lens as my #1 choice. Next would be the 70-200mm f/4 due to the constant aperture and really awesome focusing abilities plus pro build quality. The Tamron is also an excellent option and the LA-EA3 lens adapter will also work really well without the loss of light due to the translucent mirror. It won't really perform for sports that great, but everything else will work pretty awesome! I hope that helps,
Jay
+Jay SonyAlphaLab I wish to get a telephoto because I have the Sony 16-35 f4 and 55mm 1.8 . the telephoto will be for landscape and portrait. what do you think about the picture quality difference between the sony 70-300 and 70-200? because so far there's no videos on CZcams that is comparing this two lenses (within the same price range)
I think the picture quality is very similar if not better on the 70-300mm believe it or not. Not everyone will agree with that, but I remember the FE 70-200mm lens I reviewed being a litter softer than this 70-300mm. Both lenses are great though, don't get me wrong. Based on your needs that you described, I would go with the FE 70-300mm or Tamron. You can easily focus for portraits and landscape with either lens, and the extra reach is a nice bonus. The f/4 @ 20mm of the 70-200mm is a nice advantage, but I don't think you will need that unless shooting in very low light or natural light where the faster aperture is often preferred. In that case I would just slap on the 55mm f/1.8 lens though ;) I hope that helps and best of luck with your decision!
Jay
What I have notices is that the quality consistency on the 70-200mm is really not there, some have a fantastic experience and others don't, not true with the 70-300. I am still worried about it not having a tripod ring.
what software are you using ..?
I was using capture one pro for this review, but now I'm using Lightroom again...
they charging double as canon and nikon. not sure if it is double good.
Yeah, Sony lenses are significantly more, but tend to be better in most cases. This lens is just as good as a Canon L grade lens in my opinion, based on my experience.
Jay
Does this work with the A6000?
Yes
Is it worth paying an extra few hundred dollars for the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS Lens if you are using an AR7iii and are primarily shooting sports?
It really depends. The focus is a little faster on the 70-200mm and the aperture is a constant f/4, but the extra reach on the 70-300mm is really nice also.
Hi Jay, I'm stuck on this lens for my a6500 or buying a rx10 iv for doing some birding. What is your thought? Thanks Jay
Effective 600mm vs ~450mm? Depending on how close you can get, the 70-300mm will offer a little more due to the larger sensor a6500 camera. Otherwise the rx10 IV 600mm effective is a great advantage I would say. Other options like the Tamron 150mm-600mm via lens adapter, can be used on the a6500, but the size and weight are a lot compared to the RX10 IV, and harder to use. Personally I would rather have the RX10 IV for ease of use, reach, and overall quality. If I wanted better quality, then the FE 100-400mm GM lens would be my next option for max reach and quality optics. possible adding the 1.4X TC lens adapter for more reach. The smaller 1" sensor RX10 IV is not as good as the larger sensors in low light, so that may be important to you and worth noting. You never get something for nothing ;) I hope that helps!
thanks bro...
I currently own the 70-200 Sony F4. How does the 70-300 compare to this lens within the same range & same aperture?
It's pretty much the same if not better in my opinion. It really is that good!
Jay
+Jay SonyAlphaLab wow!! That's crazy!! I guess o would just have to be ok with the 1 stop of light difference at the long 200mm + end of things. I wonder why the 70-200 isn't priced below the price of the 70-300 considering that as per your results this new lens is similar or even better than that other lens.
I think it's the more Pro style lens body and all internal zooming etc.. It has a lens collar as well, but I agree it should be a little cheaper based on this lenses performance and build quality. The 70-200mm also has dual linear focus motors as apposed to one I believe based of my memory, making it faster for long focus throw situations. Therefore, the FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS lens would arguable be better for hard core sports photography based on those few factors I would think ;)
The 70-200 is equal in sharpness when cropped to have the same framing as the 300 at the long ends. I've got both and prefer still to use my 200 even at max range requirements. The 70-300 is still great
Thanks John!
The MTF shows up smoother at 300mm than at 70mm. An interesting compromise.
how does it do against a 70-300g + laea3?
I think this lens works much better than the LA-EA3 and A-Mount 70-300mm G lens combo. At least with my A7r anyway ;) I found the focus to not be as accurate and the lack of OSS made that lens harder to use on my A7r in particular. Plus I thought the contrast and colors were better on this lens as well.
Thanks for the excellent question,
Jay
The 70-300fe is much much faster focussing Than the alpha version on laea4 or 3
Thanks for the comments and info!!
Great review...but I would like to ask you. I'm about to get or this lens or the sony 70-200 f4. I'm a bit confused don't know which one buy. I'm looking for use on landscape. What you will suggest me? Thanks
I would get the 70-300mm lens personally ;) Both are great, but the 70-200mm is a little better for sports oriented photography. I would go for the better range and value for the dollar! I hope that helps.
@@Jason_Hermann hehe a bit late I already got the 70-200mm f4 . Thanks anyway
Sorry I was away Snowboarding for a few days ;) You got a great lens, so don't sweat it!!
@@Jason_Hermann Thanks mate
Hows this lens for wild life like birds compared to the 70-200mm f4 ?
I'd love to see this tested lens with the A6000 / a6300. Cheers mate.
OK, thanks for the suggestion!
*this lens tested (sorry). Thanks.
No worries Luis, I got it :)
I know :) thanks again.
My dad has the a6300 with this lens and is getting great results and the af speed is insane!
Great pairing
Plz allow me to ask what software you use in this video?
It's called Capture One Pro and it's awesome!
Jay
Thx for feedback,another thing, can it be mounted on the SEL14TC and SEL20TC?
I don't think so. The tele converters are only for the FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM Lens as far as I know.
Oops, That's kinda sad!!
Yeah, the optics have to be able to except the teleconverter. Other manufactures have the same issue and it usually only works on a few lenses for whatever reason. A shame, I agree!
I have a question for you. Not sure how true this is but another reviewer was quoted as saying that using full frame native Sony lenses on a Sony APS-C camera such as the 6300 for example would not perform equally as well as using them on a full frame Sony camera and only native Sony APS-C lenses should be used for optimum performance. Is this true? I'm asking because Nikon states that there's zero difference using their full frame lenses on their DX (aps-c) cameras, other than the 1.5X crop factor of course. I'm asking because I have an A6300 and since native Sony APS-C lenses are limited I wanted to use Sony full frame like what you're showing in this video.
I've heard this about Canon APS-C vs. Full Frame and of course Nikon is going to say it's not an issue, but honestly while there may be a tiny difference it's not something you're ever going to notice unless you spend all your time zoomed in to 300% pixel peeping instead of taking photos.
I have an A7r, A7II and a A6300 and my lenses are the Batis 85mm, G master 24-70 2.8, the 24-200, and the 28mm F2 and I shoot with all four lenses on all three cameras and I've never noticed a difference. I was especially interested in how the G Master 24-70 did on the A6300 and it was every bit as sharp as it was on the A7 models. Of course the A7r has more MP but the A7II is 24mp just like the A6300 and the results look just as detailed.
In other words don't worry about internet talk and go take photos!
mavfan1
Oh man, you're awesome! I appreciate it. I love my A6300. I'm still on the kit lens but plan to get either the 18-105 G lens ($599) or perhaps a G-master lens for it. I primarily use it for video but definitely want to use it for photos. I'll use one of your links when I'm ready to buy as I only purchase my camera equipment from B&H Photo.
Hello, There is no negative optical consequence to using a full frame lens on a crop factor body. The only negative is the lens is larger than it needs to be and heavier. etc.. Crop factor lenses are smaller and easier to handle is all. The focus speed is arguable more efficient, because the focus elements are smaller and less weight as well. When using a full frame lens on a crop factor body, you are just using the center area. So, optical quality is arguable better in the corners than on the full frame sensor.
The 18-105mm G lens is a better option for video with the a6300, because it has the killer powerzoom built in and more range than any of the g-master lenses. Those lenses are also awesome, but much heavier and larger due to the fast f/2.8 apertures etc... Optical quality will be better on the g-master lenses though, for sure.
mavfan1
Please disregard my post. It was meant for Jay. LOL. I can't buy lenses through you. Sorry. All I did was pay attention to the reply that I was expecting from him without noticing the name. Haha.
Great review!
Basically it is OK lens nothing special same like other 70-300mm but it priced like it is L lens.
Thank you.
I prefer the Leica 90mm - 280mm f2.8 - 4
Yeah, only 5x the price of this lens!
2 things :) ?
1: has anyone tested this with the a6000...i cant give this camera up it is unbeatable in the water for surf photography and have the dollars invested in housings.
2: this thing doesnt have a tripod mount? wont this stress the camera frame as its packi g a bit of weight
cheers
I have not tried the lens on the A6000, but it should work awesome! Yes, the A6000 would be stressed a bit mounted to a tri-pod with tis lens, but as long as you don't bounce it or anything, it should be fine...
thanks mate :) such a shame they didnt design it with a collar but this is the lense ive been needing for years!
they almost lost me to canon haha. now i can buy this lense and enjoy with my a6000 on land from distance knowing i can invest in the a7r in the future :)
We all know oss increases the weight and size of the lens. Not sure why sony have oss in their lenses when they have ibis in almost all cameras. I dont understand the logic. All new sony lenses are bulky because of this. Mirrorless losing its main advantage.
I think sony should make non oss irrespective of any lens which reduce size weight and also cost.
The optical IS makes it even better! The sensor stabilization is great, but combined with the optical, it's incredible ;) Not all the cameras have sensor stabilization, like my A7r for example.... All the new units due though, now that the A6500 came out.
Are you still using this lens?
No I just had it for about a month while reviewing it, and then sent it back. Great lens though!
Nothing to do with the lens or the review (for the most part), but please would you drop the 'dots'?
It's 4 POINT 5 - 5 POINT 6, not 4 DOT 5 - 5 DOT 6. There is no difference in difficulty, or time, to say the correct nomenclature.
Ok, I really appreciate the feedback and will try my best to correct that. It's a bad habit, so it's actually not that easy for me to say point instead believe it or not ;) It can be done though!