Cambridge Audio CXC CD Transport featuring Sanyo SF-P101N laser mechanism. Quality modern unit.

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 11. 2023
  • It is all in the video.
    Just want to correct what I said, that of course the output trace I showed on the oscilloscope was SPDIF and not Toslink (to which the DAC was connected).
    And of course, earlier on I called a servo box "a power supply". Senior moment as they say.
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 11

  • @alaino4185
    @alaino4185 Před 5 měsíci +1

    I'm happy with my TASCAM CD200 (265€!) as a CD Transport connected to the Technics SU-G700M2. The drive is the famous TEAC CD-5020A

  • @erkyperky1387
    @erkyperky1387 Před 2 měsíci

    Hi, i have this same cxc also and the drawer is noisy and vibrates/jitters when its closing. Im guessing this a belt problem and needs a replacement. Can you please tell me if this cxc uses the same belts as the azur models?

    • @hear-net-au
      @hear-net-au  Před 2 měsíci

      The same meaning square rubber belts ;-) I don't normally measure belts but simply fit them from the stock I have. Sorry that I can't be more helpful

    • @erkyperky1387
      @erkyperky1387 Před 2 měsíci

      ​@@hear-net-auOk thanks I get it now there are square belts on eBay that fit there previous models azur

  • @Andre-bs5nl
    @Andre-bs5nl Před 8 měsíci

    where are the digital and analoge parts in sthis player actually?

    • @hear-net-au
      @hear-net-au  Před 8 měsíci +2

      There is no analogue section, for this is a transport only. It's output is SPIDIF and Toslink

  • @puciohenzap891
    @puciohenzap891 Před 8 měsíci +3

    Few years lifespan at best, another prime example of planned obsolescence by putting a cover on the servo with the heatsink all around.
    Add crap quality electrolytics to the mix and it will be a doorstop in 5-10 years, if the laser doesn't give up earlier.
    Exact same stupid design as NAD and current Audiolab, I've seen tens of broken ones already.

    • @hear-net-au
      @hear-net-au  Před 8 měsíci

      I did not want to be that harsh, because people might think that because I normally only deal with vintage stuff, I am biased against modern equipment.
      But indeed, you are probably right. A lot of folk only want to buy new stuff with warranty (which I also give on the vintage gear) and are worried about lasers. Very often the new gear breaks down and parts are no linger available 5 years since the manufacture date.
      I also wanted to see what was inside, because Audiolab and Cambridge are often mentioned in "what transport to buy" forum discussions.

    • @r423sdex
      @r423sdex Před 7 měsíci

      Few years , crap quality, you are clueless.

    • @puciohenzap891
      @puciohenzap891 Před 7 měsíci

      @@hear-net-au Sadly this is how they're designed. I've had a beautiful Audiolab 8200CD that had massive, multiple power supplies and heatsinks everywhere = but no ventilation holes at the top! Besides that, the electrolytics were C-tier Lelon and other junk and placed in a row, just between 2 rows of heatsinks. Needless to say the player died after a few years and opening the top cover revealed about 50% of the caps were either bulged or leaking at the top already.
      Lead free soldering and multi-layer boards only add insult to the injury, it wasn't actually worth fixing anymore 😞

  • @promethiousb1489
    @promethiousb1489 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Great sound,,but my mates wouldnt play copies..