The Deadliest Submarine the USSR Ever Built
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 09. 2018
- The first 1,000 people to sign up to Skillshare will get their first 2 months for free: skl.sh/infographics33
Stealthy and absolutely deadly, submarines are a navy's worst nightmare...and the world has seen some very large submarines. But which is the biggest submarine ever built?
Join us as we go back to the end of the Cold War to investigate, in this episode of The Infographics Show, the largest submarine ever built.
SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfographicsShow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
theinfographicsshow.com
SUPPORT US:
Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
SOCIAL:
Twitter........► / theinfoshow
Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for this episode:
pastebin.com/y1Mfr5u6
What about the question - would you ever serve aboard a submarine? Know anyone who has? What was it like?
Nope
I took a physics class in college and met a nuke. A.K.A. a nuclear reactor technician who served aboard a US nuclear submarine. He was very good at physics, eventually learned his experience as a nuke in the Navy meant he already met the physics requirement for his major so he was able to drop the course.
When I asked him what it was like on a submarine, he quickly replied "boring."
"fun" fact: the survival rate of german u-boat crewmen in world war two was only ~25%
Six years. Ssbn611. Best duty in the navy. 70-90 day patrols 2xper year. Best training. Best folks. Super
Yes I, did four years on a sub. It is hard to explain if you never served on one.
But was it built with knowledge from skillshare?
No they used chegg
which is nuclear weapons are stronger russia or north korea?
Well I guess it would be Russia, because tsar bomba was the biggest nuclear bomb ever tested, the bomb itself detonated at 50 mega tons of tnt, and the shock wave circling the earth three times. But even worse, it was a 100 Mega tons nuclear device, but the designer ask the soviet premier to decrease it for the safety of other people in the surrounding and the pilot it self. And the fun fact, tsar bomba have the cleanest nuclear fallout of all bomb because the decreasing of the bomb yield to a half
There is also some rumors that Red October the so called "Caterpillar Drive" or Magnetohydrodynamic drive (MHD) may have been indeed tested on a Typhoon class but due to major technical and performance problems, it was scrapped quickly and no Navy adopted it. Also it was rumored to have an earlier self arming torpedo, but that was probably just propaganda although one sub in the early 2000's the Minsk supposedly sank because of an experimental torpedo killing over 100 sailors. May they rest in peace.
Kurt Bolneo, that's a great question, does North Korea have a tsar bomb?
Akula ( NATO code name typhoon )
But currently Russians call it typhoon.
There is an another submarine called Akula. you are showing the images of that one,not the typhoon.
Please correct your errors. You guys do that everytime
Who would win? Millions of military and law Officers.... One big boi
according to the movie red october, akula is a fast attack sub. thats bs?
@@13orrax yes, akulas are fast attacks
michael hellwinkle but the Kursk was a typhoon class and it had a swimming pool. I'm confused. Internet has conflicting info. I'm going to watch hfro again to make sure lol
@@13orrax I was in the navy, on a US submarine. Trust me, akulas are fast attacks. Typhoon class boats are boomers, they are not the same thing
“The biggest submarine ever built”
*Shows picture of Akula*
Lachie Clements so? Thats correct.
@@arcaipekyun4232No it's not, because they show pictures of NATO-designated-Akula (Schuka-B) and not of Soviet-designated-Akula (Which is Typhoon and IS the biggest sub)
Soroka Beloboka oh i didnt know that
What about the Japanese aircraft carrier sub built near the end of WW2? There were only 2 built and both were captured by American forces and scuttled to prevent the Russians from getting any ideas.
@@sorokabeloboka8818 correct... Absolutely
I think the coolest part of subs is that it's almost like a space ship, freely exploring an environment you cannot safely travel in with any other vehicle.
bad thing is that you can't see in the water:(
"USSR"
"Luxury"
Those are two words you almost never hear together.
Thats what actually surprised me in this video, first time I hear someone from West admiting that in some parts people in USSR lived BETTER than in US(if anyone bothered to learn they would know there were many examples of simple people having it better tho).
I sincerely doubt that, especially considering that the most basic of human freedoms didn't exist in the USSR.
USSR: luxury for everyone more like
@@sheevpalpatine7588 The luxury of starving to death and getting executed xD
@@terrypennington2519 same was in US in time of Big Depression.
Reminds me of Red Alert 2 Soviet Attack Sub
"Ship reporting"
My favorite game!
Well, it's time for me to download this game back!
Who Am I ? We have a discord server with over 400 people who play ra2
Good under pressure...
RA3 - Akula sub ready for the deeeeep
I served on board 2 nuclear subs in the 80s and 90s toward the end of the cold war...I honestly say that each mission had me scared sh*tless...each side seeing the other as the enemy and each side had the green light to blow the other out of the water...each side saying to the other, 'Go ahead...make my day'...
Guys, you're showing the Akula class, which is strictly an attack submarine, not an SSBN
Typhoon (NATO designation) is Project 941 or Akula (USSR designation).
Akula (NATO designation) is Project 971 or Shchuka-B (USSR designation).
@@tz8785 Ah, thanks! Buuuut, they're still not showing the Typhoon (NATO) SSBN, which is the largest submarine in the world.
That's been bugging me too. The Akula (Project 941) has the sail aft of the missile deck, not forward.
Saibot, wdym?? he shows a picture of the NATO akula design clearly by its tail desgin..
*Alicorn Submarine Joins the Server with akula*
In the video, the model used looks more like the Shchuka-B class SSN (NATO classification: Akula) and not the Akula-class SSBN (NATO Classification: Typhoon) which the video references. The true Akula class submarine has a long, wide hull with the sail mounted after, closer to the stern of the ship. The torpedo tubes are mounted on the bow in a 4+2 organization. The sail itself is large and a bit fat-looking where it meets the hull, and has some windows at the top. Soon after the sail, very near to the stern of the ship is the tall rudder, which does not have a towed array pod like that of the Victor III (Nato class.) and Shchuka-B SSNs.
The model in the video much better resembles the Shchuka-B class SSN, a nuclear attack submarine that had no capability to launch ballistic missiles and was certainly not 172 meters long (Akula I was 110.3m). The Akula, like most other Soviet nuclear attack submarines, has a short sail that diminishes into the hull. Atop the rudder is a large pod that looks very much like the one shown in the video; it houses the submarine's towed array sonar.
Not a big detail, but I think it's a bit strange to show the wrong model.
Well it is a bit annoying if you know the difference. Now everyone who sees this video with no further interests in submarines will have a wrong idea of how the Tyhpoon looks like. If they just kept it its Nato name they wouldn't get or confused or confused others.
Yeah, when they said "largest submarine built" i just remembered a typhoon next to an akula, thinking this video is all sorts of wrong.
Infographics always use the wrong model in his videos it's really annoying.
LegosubmarineCaptain Perhaps me saying it is "strange" was an understatement. I agree.
Thing is, Lego, they show a Typhoon at a few points, and an Akula at others.
"Our submarine"
u no go to gulag
@@iluminate4864 no u
The Infographics Show-- yet failed to include any ACTUAL pictures of a real Typhoon Class (NATO), a.k.a. Akula Class submarine.
I don't get it. Why not?
@Gabriel James Eramian NATO name is "Typhoon"....the RUSSIAN name is "Akula"....check it out.
It can be confusing, I know.
@Gabriel James Eramian Correct: The pics shown aren't the correct pictures of the NATO named submarine class "Typhoon"...exactly what I said the first time...(?)
@Gabriel James Eramian Yes we are- I like their shows but, they constantly show the wrong graphic!....it's annoying, right?
@Gabriel James Eramian well, russia called two submarines akula and the us called one of them typhoon class, just call it typhoon class to not get confused because that is the one we are talking about
A submarine surrounded by infinite water.
Soviets : Lets make a swimming pool in the submarine.
hah , the funny think is that this is a lie of russians and soviets . why russians to ? beacuse Russia is Soviet Union but it is only one contry , and without that comunist mania ( my thing is evrybods thing) .
Maxim Palii
???????
**Plays Nation Anthem Of USSR**
*leave intensifies*
*I Feel Hungry*
@@garrettallen7427 *I feel cold*
The Internationale or whatever it's called is better
*We,Us,Our*
Sleep for 12 hours? Ha! Try only 3-5 hours, if you're lucky.
Student live sucks... I usually get 2-3... 4 if I'm lucky. I'm literally a zombie from Monday to Friday.
@@icedviking4485 I hear that. Sometimes, I was awake for 24, 36, or 48 hours straight. Sub life sucks.
Dr__Tarn wow really that sounds like a shitty time. Why didn’t ur officers not let you sleep? Wasn’t it a hazard. Can’t imagine how it was for you and the other guys. Must have really sucked
@@odynith9356 The officers had nothing to do with it. It was my division and the way the schedule fell. Hated every moment of it. I still have nightmares that I'm back and there's nothing I can do about it.
I hear ya Dr__Tarn. One time before we went out to sea, I stood the shutdown watch - then had to do the reactor startup check list (during the overnight), then I was on duty for the actual reactor startup, I was the maneuvering reactor opertor, so had to stand watch when we left port and wasn't scheduled to get off watch until we dove -- after which time I was supposed to be relieved. Lo and behold, immediately after we dove, we ran battlestation drills (and I was the battlestation RO), and right after that, I finally turned over. I no sooner got to the mess decks to grab a snack when they ran a reactor scram drill, so as the off going reactor operator, I had to return to maneuvering to aid in the reactor recovery. All told, I was up for more than 40 straight hours, and I was looking at no more than 5 hours of sleep before I had to be back up for watch again. Luckily my division chief needed to do his proficiency watch for qualifications, so he covered my shift. I slept for almost 18 straight hours...
Mistake correction please!!! 2:54 you say a variable yield of 100 to 200 kilotons, but the card reads 1000 to 2000 kilotons
the card says 'per missile' - each missile could carry 10 warheads
I was a navy sonar tech on the uss fox cg-33, They wanted me to go on a submarine seeing as i got perfect scores in every catagory but when i found out about the hot racking and only 1 shower for over 80 guys i was told i would get one shower a week if i was lucky, i just couldn't imagine what the smell of my bunk would be, let alone if anything ever happened i want to be able to jump off the ship not try to hold my breath for a few hours.I had no problem hunting subs from a surface ship,it was the hardest job i ever had and this video is right about how bad and loud the soviet subs were they just didnt have the money at the time most of the surface ships we saw they all had rust marks all over, I also got to learn of all the close calls and accidents that are never told to the public, So to answer your question no way! I still would not serve on a sub even now! Besides when they come back after a deployment they are just weird! All of them! not sure if it's not seeing the sun for 6 months or what ever! The surface fleet always said the submariners are a very odd group but very glad we have them!
Anybody else thought the video was about a submarine that lauches smaller submarine looking at the thumbnail? 😂
No.
I knew it wasn't but I did think "Man imagine a submarine that could launch much smaller subs"
Nope
Maybe your a fool
@@Mr__Mollusk how will i becom a fool 😂😂..pls remove ur donkey brain and install a human brain 😂😂😂...such a fool..u r...do u even have a brain 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
3:00 Good layering on the arm there
I'm glad to see the inaccuracies in this video. Still entertaining.
ha
"Do you think they will let me live in Montana?"
Eric Ulch Maybe a “recreational vehicle” haha
i suspect that they will let you live where ever you like
It isn't true saying that the missiles in the subs alone can take out every city in the USA. The nukes in the main missile can't actually target other cites. The nukes that come out of the main missile can't move far off target from one another. The nukes are all meant to hit the same city just in different places within the city to take the whole city out in one go. This strategy was found to be more effective at taking out a city then building one missile with a single large nuke in it. This is because you first want to make sure a nuke is getting through to a city since there are defenses to ICBMs. Sending multiple missiles in will overwhelm a missile defense system (or at least that is hope of the country launching the missiles, who knows what defenses countries actually have against ICBMs) This is the same strategy the USA missiles from subs and and ground launched ICBMs use as well.
MIRV warheads can indeed hit targets hundreds of miles apart. The missile enters orbit and the warheads separate from the booster, they then re-enter the earth's atmosphere and independently destroy what they target. They don't behave like artillery shells where they split while in their ballistic arc, this is why the space program was so important to the military.
Pretty cool of the USSR to provide such accommodations to help relief stress for people on-board
Man I love how this guy uploads often great job
I know a guy who commanded a "boomber". There wasn't much he could say about his job, but he did say Navy planers figured they'd be lucky to get half there missiles launch before the torpedo struck the ship.
You see, they had to come to a near stop to launch, and they couldn't move again until there missiles were all away. This took several minutes, and it was not quiet.
Both sides escorted the other, and they kept a lock on the enemy. As soon as they started to launch, the attack subs would also launch. It was just a race to see how many you could get off.
In a nuclear war, the sub drivers would have been the first to die.
Love these Cold War vids!
Thank you!
Same here I love name Soviets
Wait wrong universe-
Favourite CZcams channel, favourite narrator. Keep it up infographic show
I was literally watching The Hunt for Red October when I saw this video come out
Alexa, play Soviet national anthem
Blyatiful!
@mickor you idiot that missle is aimed at us
Alexa, set my new ringtone
The russian variant of Alexa is stalinia
Currently serving on an Ohio class submarine. The akula is still a formidable opponent, over the years they've definitely become more silent and their crew has become smarter. We're always on alert and staying as silent as humanly possible but even if a door closes with a loud click it could give us away. Akulas are dangerous and scary but I feel like we're the ones they should be afraid of.
Akulas aren't, mainly because 5 of the 6 made are either scrapped or waiting to be scrapped.
@@thecbrndude6208 I’m presuming you mean the Typhoon-class, which the Soviets called the Akula-class.
What I think our submariner friend is talking about (and I admit it is confusing) is the attack submarine class of Soviet origin known to NATO countries as an Akula-class, but in Soviet circles the name they gave the class was, I believe, the Pike B-class.
Why NATO would call a new class of submarine what the Soviets called a previous class of a different type of submarine the exact same name is beyond me, but hey. I’m not here to judge.
i wish captain grishkov got a medal for preventing a big disaster its a disgrace that he did not get a medal
Couple of mistakes, the TK-17 wasn't one of the first Akulas built, it was the second to last ever built. And Russian Navy only has one Typhoon in service with the Northern Fleet, the TK-208, the very first Typhoon ever built. And TK-208 It is now primarily used as a missiles testing platform for new SLBM designs and test-firings. The rest of the 5 subs have been either scrapped, waiting to be scrapped or decommissioned and kept in storage. Also, the TK-208 is not really meant for missile warfare anymore as the R-39 Rif missiles where retired back in 2004. While TK-208 has been upgraded to carry the RSM-56 SLBM, but it is used more for carrying out missile testing than anything else.
1:48 tf is that misstle headed for my city
I just find swimming in a pool while being submerged underwater hilarious.
Good video and good music to go along with it
You're talking about the "Typhoon" class? Akula never had the amenities u've described here.
a comment above from pharmacist
n the video, the model used looks more like the Shchuka-B class SSN (NATO classification: Akula) and not the Akula-class SSBN (NATO Classification: Typhoon) which the video references. The true Akula class submarine has a long, wide hull with the sail mounted after, closer to the stern of the ship. The torpedo tubes are mounted on the bow in a 4+2 organization. The sail itself is large and a bit fat-looking where it meets the hull, and has some windows at the top. Soon after the sail, very near to the stern of the ship is the tall rudder, which does not have a towed array pod like that of the Victor III (Nato class.) and Shchuka-B SSNs.
The model in the video much better resembles the Shchuka-B class SSN, a nuclear attack submarine that had no capability to launch ballistic missiles and was certainly not 172 meters long (Akula I was 110.3m). The Akula, like most other Soviet nuclear attack submarines, has a short sail that diminishes into the hull. Atop the rudder is a large pod that looks very much like the one shown in the video; it houses the submarine's towed array sonar.
Not a big detail, but I think it's a bit strange to show the wrong model.
Sabaton: *makes a music for the most powerful battleship*
later in 2038 maybe
Sabaton: *Makes a music for the AKULA SUB*
Kapitan
The Federation Starfleet also has Akula class ships in their fleet, but those are Akula class starships, they have two warp nacelles one placed on the top and one placed on the bottom of the saucer section, they could reach a speed of warp 7.
i love how this guy is not biased to the us
“The Akula, or Typhoon...”
I’m going to pretend I didn’t just hear that.
That's to do with misinterpretation of translation, the West uses the term typhoon but the Russians called them akula. They call their akula something else in russian,
@@asubmariner7970 Shchuka
Typhoon is NATO designition for Akula (USSR designition)
Akula is NATO designition for Schuka-B (USSR designition)
"Got a great product idea but don't know how to launch it?"
I mean, there's always nuclear submarine missiles.
Actually Clancy's first book was Cardinal of the Kremlin. Hunt for Red October was published first, but Cardinal was written and took place before October.
Ryan mentions meeting Ramius, I think they met when Ryan was on the mission to rescue the Cardinal.
The typhoon looks differently than the graphic.
Good video
1:50 is that really how the missle would travel?
Take all the time you need
Well yes that is dumb way for a missile, but what if it (sub) was so silent to come as close as possible (San Francisco for the example)
You’re back! My life is complete again
@Caelliox In within 1 day so stfu
Same here
Thank you!
Thank you for the info. I was so used to using the NATO designations that I forgot that the Soviet names for the class of both the boomer and the hunter killer subs.
"Monster Nuclear Missle" That just sounds awesome.
😂 a pool in a submarine why is that so funny to me
Just like having a fireplace in a firetruck!
beacuse its a lie
Um it does have a pool i just checked
Maxim Palii it does have a pool lol
There are two kinds of watercrafts - submarines and targets.
The Typhoon was an amazing and unique sub.
I did serve on submarines I thought this video was very informative I really liked it
Title :Biggest Sub USSR ever build
*Shows Akula Class
You know that the US is basically Russias neighbour, right? Why are you drawing a line across the whole globe instead of just across the pacific ocean?
Philip Plutki
Sarah Palin could see Russia from her house!
Wanna know something weird? America is closer to Russia than nearly every country in Europe. All thanks to the little and big diomede islands
good to know I love the info
Thanks Imfogrqphics show for making Alaska the correct size!
USA submarine meet the USSR submarine.....
Deja Vu, I just been in this place before
"Akula " means "shark" in Russian. Now you know one more russian word!
Thank you.
Акула
Graphics incorrect. The r showing graphics of the akula III class subs, but talking abt the typhoon class subs.
The sub you have in this looks more akin to what NATO called the Akula class (a SSN, Project 971). They Typhoon class (Akula in Russia) was much more bulky and had the SLBMs forward of the sail. That aside, good video!
I am disappointed in people down on the comment section, not a single good soviet joke. Here's one from me thеn, it will be in Russian though: Ты потратил время на перевод, поздравляю! Хотя с другой стороны я потратил время на написание этого комментария.
cyka blyat
HAAHHQAHAHAHAH
OMG I AM DYING FROM LAUGTHER.
I don't get it plss translate
Translation please?
Haha jokes on you I can read Russian
nice lol
" *Akula sub, ready for the deep* "
ship reporting
Both turbine slow ahead together ! And zero the plat
Bad news. This entire video got the two classes of submarines mixed up. Tom Clancy's Red October was a modified TYPHOON class. Very different from the Akula class atack sub. Akula class subs are smaller, speedier and more maneuverable so they were used as submarine hunters. The Typhoon class behemoth was the strategic nuclear ICBM carrier. Their designs are so different that it is amazing anyone would confuse them.
Imperial Japanese Navy first planned the new usage of subs: Carrier subs. There were a few carrier subs later seized by US with their pinnacle of tech Seiran bomber. The compartment designed to hold 2 Seiran later lead to the development of missile subs.
"deadliest submarine ever built" goes right to "largest submarine ever built"
The actual name of the submarine is Stalin Gulag
STALIN'S A SHORK?!
Actually it has a medal for being able to send people to gulags in record time. Even us citizens were not safe
Aka heaven
no. Gulag was subterrain.
Shipbuilders: so, how big do you want your submarine to be?
Russian/Soviet Navy: *Y* *E* *S*
In Tom Clancy's book, the Red October didn't have so many "Capitalist luxuries" as an arcade, pool, and sauna.
Also, the Akula (Project 741, NATO designation: "Typhoon") has the sail AFT of the missile deck, not forward.
Some very misleading info in this video. Particularly when pretending that these enormous submarines were nearly twice as heavy as they actually were. The Akula class subs were massive, but they only displaced 48,000 tons of seawater when submerged. With their ballast tanks empty they only displaced 24,500 tons.
The Gerald Ford class carriers displace 100,000 tons, but if you filled one with enough water to sink it, their weight would increase by orders of magnitude. When these subs surfaced, most of the sub remained under water while the overwhelming majority of a aircraft carrier resides above the surface considering they have a draft of 39 feet and the flight deck sits about 55 feet above the waterline. If you really wanted to give us an accurate size comparison you would have taken the time to figure out the volume of these subs.
I think he said a WWII aircraft carrier. Like the York town. That only weighed 44,000 tons. But it also goes to propulsion also. If it is submerged with ballest tanks full then its engines must move 48,000 tons. And the aircraft carrier also must move that kind of weight.
@@buildthings79 Submerged vessels take less effort to propel than surface vessels because they aren't continuously breaking the surface tension of water.
The name translates into shark
I speak Russian
Typhoon is name that NATO calls it like how they name Su-27 as flanker
cool tech me
Russia sucks
@@villager4672 you ever live there?
Zarya One Trick have you? if you have how does it look there
8:07 ... no typhoon left in service !! theyre kept in reserve i think until 2019 but forget them they are replaced by the Borei class !
TK-208, Dmitriy Donskoy will dislike you. It's still in active service in the Northern Fleet.
Great video
The typhoon class is a sister of the oscar class a larger submarine
No it was not
Umm no the Oscar class was smaller and It was a different type of sub
Is this the military industrial complex channel now?
I know right? I was about to unsubscribe, but now they've got my attention back
No it’s the bullshit channel all their videos are half assed garbage full of misinformation
This is the first time Ive heard of Soviet Russie beating the US in the luxury department.
Those dudes really know how to build a sub
1 2 3 Four Five Of course they do just ask Kursk
@@kingucrimson5383 Ask the Kilo class sub whole nato was searching in Eastern Mediterranean.Oh really one of your aircraft carriers got hit by a swedish sub ,right?Imagine what a yasen class sub is gonna do.
The pool in the Akula was used to store potatoes. The movement of the sub made the pool water splatter over the side of the pool.
"2 metal trash cans being dragged through the water."
That sounds like nothing.
The biggest submarine would be a sunken US supercarrier
And we have it already, the ex-USS America (CV-66) which was scuttled back in 2006.
Btw the NATO name for the sub is Typhoon, the Soviet name was Project-941 Akula
The Nato designation for Akula class submarines equates to the Soviet Shchuka (Pike) class. The Nato designation for the submarine you are talking about is the Typhoon class. Both were built in the 80s and both have a double hull for breaking through ice. Since you use Nato designations for everything else in this video you should probably keep it consistent and use the proper designation of Typhoon. In fact, if you view Jane's Fighting Ships, Google, or even Wikipedia for the Akula Class submarine you will see the fast attack ship. As for their capabilities, Typhoon carried the R-39 missiles with 20 tubes for a total of 200 warheads (you got that correct) while Ohio class has 24 missile tubes that carry the Trident II D5 missile with 12 MIRV's bringing the Ohio to a possible 288 warheads, a pretty significant difference. So just one volley of half the missiles on an Ohio, it could strike 144 targets to the Typhoon's 100.
Secondarily, hot bunking does not normally occur on an Ohio class submarine as there are more bunks on the ship than there are people normally. Using gym equipment though nice would probably cause a lot of noise so it is not because Ohio is restricted in space but rather out of ship and crew safety. Hydrodynamics says that if you have a tank full of water sloshing around it will cause the buoyancy of the ship to alter based on where the weight is located meaning that the pool and hot tub again are nice but they are dangerous. Look at pools as yet another liquid that can splash around and cause damage let alone the havoc it must have caused the trim and list of the ship (a 4x4x4 foot pool of water weighs 3,840 lbs or 1578 kg). Ohio class also has a large room for crew members to use computers, and another to watch movies, and play video games in contrast to your description.
This video is very inaccurate if for no other reason than it is stating a false narrative without actually doing research.
Akulas are fast attack Hunter killer subs......not the big nuclear missile launching boomers! the research team messed up again
bugsy101073 The NATO calls Typhoons, Akulas.
no nato calls russian Akulas Typhoon and the Shchuka are the one nato call Akula and theyre very different theyre type 6 SSN
Akula is the russian designation of Typhoon class SSBN. Nato code Akula is an SSN.
bugsy101073 "akula" is a nickname commonly used for the typhoon submarines
I think he means that team messed up and shows Schuka-B (NATO name Akula) in the video, instead of Akula (NATO name Typhoon).
Two completely different subs
"worlds largest submarine" SHOWS ALFA
Yeah... They kinda messed that one up.
Any accident could have brought on nuclear disaster without an all out war between both country.
america crew:let me sleep
ussr crew:we go play world warship
Plotwist it was megalodon shark operated by russian soldiers from the inside
one day, The Russian will make a submarine with 2 TSAR Bomb
I always check comments first to see if it is inaccurate, this one seems good. Good job.
It's FAR from accurate, on many levels. I'll go into it in a few minutes. My expertise is 14 years as a submarine sonar technician.
Is anybody gonna talk about him saying the Akula Class Submarine Red October The Akula was a Alfa class submarine.
?
YAY right on time!
That's not USSR, that is Russian Federation
Even tho my TVs on I’m watching this.. nothing never good on tv anyway
The mayor of my town used to serve on diesel electric subs
Did what's with these heroic Russian soldiers not getting medals. I mean they literally saved the world.
there was quite wide compain against army back in the days, then economy falls down. So it was just bad time to be a hero in Russia.
*THANOS SUBMARINE*
Noah SlayZz Pls no
Bruh
Wooow Your videos are the best in the universe
That's all it is is an ice breaker. Until someone drops a cigarette.
“Akoula” is Russian for shark
The Akula and Typhoon are 2 different submarines. One has a single shaft, the other has two. One is a hunter-killer, like the Los Angeles and Seawolf classes, the other is a massive ballistic missile submarine (see Hunt for Red October movie). (Edit: The NATO designations are the ones I mentioned. I guess Typhoon's Russian name was Akula, so a bit confusing)
Akulas are retired minus 1 which was converted into a bulva class. I'm a navy brat. My dad's a 20 yr sub vet. Been on a couple of his subs while in Port. Hell I've been on a sub in Port when a fire broke out, small fire thankfully. Their awesome
1:02 ah yes, a submarine in the middle of nowhere, Laos known as land