CORRECTION: When I mention the Glock 43 and its larger magazine capacity throughout the video, I mean the Glock 43X. That's what I get for doing a terrible job keeping track of Glock's random sub compact pistols!
Bought one of these for my gf 2 years ago. When I got it in and held it I wanted to keep it for myself. This last christmas I bought one for my mother. I love the pistol, it feels nice in the hand, I love the way it handles when you fire it.
I consider this to be the natural choice of James Bond. Very accurate, soft shooter, fits my small hands. But my triggers still gritty after several hundred rounds and I've mangled the spring tring to reassemble my M1
The CCP was going to be my next carry piece before the 365XL came out. I really did like the ergos of it, but the limited capacity really knocked it down a few pegs.
Apparently Walther filed for a patent for an 'increased capacity magazine'. I've been begging Walther for years to figure out how to get a few more rounds into this gun and to improve the trigger but I'm guessing they won't do anything further with this Umarex design. The rumor is that they are going to release an increased capacity PPS M3, or M2+. It's too bad, because the ergonomics on this gun are possibly the best I've felt at that size.
When will you be releasing files for a 1.5 stagger magazine and a jig to get rid of the support ribs? Walther should update this platform with the PDP stippling and trigger mechanism. Although my P99 AS trigger has the shortest reset of the P99, PPQ, and PDP - the PDP is current production and might be able to be adapted to a CCP M3 frame redesign
I think it would make for a great suppressed platform. The non-tilting barrel would eliminate the need for a Nielsen device, however, the increased backpressure might do funky stuff with the gas delayed blowback system. It would be fun to experiment with either way.
I had one, it was pretty good for the mid 2010s. However, i have a 365xl with a dot and 12 rounds which just utterly outclasses this gun in about every way
Probably never, lol. Since this uses a gas piston setup below the chamber, it does tend to generate more heat within the frame compared to something like a Glock. Now, it's not uncomfortable unless you're putting a LOT of rounds through it in a short timeframe, but I doubt that our low temperature tolerant printed materials would fare terribly well.
Do you have the original or the M2? The original was a joke requiring a tool to disassemble. The M2 just requires practice, but is still definitely more involved than other pistols like Glocks.
Sadly, it seems like they didn’t make any really major changes, other than to the slide. I wish they took the opportunity to do a higher capacity magazine frame!
Since this is marketed towards people with less hand strength, that might be a reason for the single stack magazine. Much easier to load than a double stack. I have the M1 and it is quite easy to load the magazine without a loading tool
I carry..and shoot it just fine.. conceals fine w/Crossbreed holster. Can put 5 round in the X ring at 25 - 30 ft. the rest 10/9 rings occasional 8's when i flinch It shoots fine. Yeah trigger could be better but most CCP M1 shooters say they dont notice the squish when shooting it. (its more like grinding) But I have noticed it has wore over time and rounds and is even less now. Get it drop test fixed for free from Walther. As with anything, it is a tool. Get to know its ability and see it for what it is. practice, practice, practice. - Ex Army
>demonstrating a gun with live rounds off the shooting range when you really don’t have to, flagging literally everything in the room including yourself Never do this
Miss the part where I show that it was unloaded like 4 times? The magazine has rounds in it because… it’s my carry weapon that I literally pulled straight off my hip, ejected the round in the chamber, and filmed. Rounds in a magazine don’t spontaneously fire themselves.
@@booliganshootingsports saw it every time. And put back in, and taken out, and put back in, without any regard where your muzzle was going. I will tell you plainly that a man who fiddles with a gun like that in my presence is not one I’ll ever shoot with. Think of me how you like, but that looks like unsafe handling to me and I wouldn’t trust you.
Again, bullets don’t magically jump from the magazine into the chamber without you chambering them. Notice how I didn’t chamber any rounds? Flagging the walls in my film studio with an empty chamber is really something you’re concerned about?
CORRECTION: When I mention the Glock 43 and its larger magazine capacity throughout the video, I mean the Glock 43X. That's what I get for doing a terrible job keeping track of Glock's random sub compact pistols!
Thank You for your reviews. I have never owned a 9MM Semi Auto. Would You recommend the Walther CCP M2 9MM for a lifelong Revolver user?
Bought one of these for my gf 2 years ago. When I got it in and held it I wanted to keep it for myself. This last christmas I bought one for my mother. I love the pistol, it feels nice in the hand, I love the way it handles when you fire it.
Don't they hate the reassembly? Most women hate that kind of stuff.
I consider this to be the natural choice of James Bond. Very accurate, soft shooter, fits my small hands. But my triggers still gritty after several hundred rounds and I've mangled the spring tring to reassemble my M1
I can't see Bond ever fiddling with that terrible reassembly procedure.
@@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 Bond probably just tosses all his wrecked gadets and dirty guns at Q. He doesn't seem like the type for maintenance.
@@CaptainShuffles Bond absolutely cleans his own guns
The CCP was going to be my next carry piece before the 365XL came out. I really did like the ergos of it, but the limited capacity really knocked it down a few pegs.
Pretty little gun
Apparently Walther filed for a patent for an 'increased capacity magazine'. I've been begging Walther for years to figure out how to get a few more rounds into this gun and to improve the trigger but I'm guessing they won't do anything further with this Umarex design. The rumor is that they are going to release an increased capacity PPS M3, or M2+. It's too bad, because the ergonomics on this gun are possibly the best I've felt at that size.
The CCP is gigantic compared to its walther brothers the PPS M1/M2. They should have gone for a 10+ sized grip.
When will you be releasing files for a 1.5 stagger magazine and a jig to get rid of the support ribs?
Walther should update this platform with the PDP stippling and trigger mechanism. Although my P99 AS trigger has the shortest reset of the P99, PPQ, and PDP - the PDP is current production and might be able to be adapted to a CCP M3 frame redesign
Running printed mags in guns designed around steel ones is almost always a losing proposition, but the possibility is there!
Ive held one and the grip feels so good
I enjoy shooting and carrying my M1, though I do wish they would make a threaded barrel for them. Would be a blast to shoot suppressed.
I think it would make for a great suppressed platform. The non-tilting barrel would eliminate the need for a Nielsen device, however, the increased backpressure might do funky stuff with the gas delayed blowback system. It would be fun to experiment with either way.
@@booliganshootingsports I'm pretty sure the suppressor would totally mess up the gas-delay system.
Also with the recoil spring fixed barrel capacity and size this gun does somewhat remind me of a makarov
Neat! Did not know that... Thanks again!
I had one, it was pretty good for the mid 2010s. However, i have a 365xl with a dot and 12 rounds which just utterly outclasses this gun in about every way
Hopefully they make the third version optic ready
Optic ready, stack and a half, 30 super carry….
When are the files coming for this frame? Haha
Probably never, lol. Since this uses a gas piston setup below the chamber, it does tend to generate more heat within the frame compared to something like a Glock. Now, it's not uncomfortable unless you're putting a LOT of rounds through it in a short timeframe, but I doubt that our low temperature tolerant printed materials would fare terribly well.
I love the gun, hate to clean it.
It’s like some kind of fidgety puzzle game. My reassembly record time is 35 seconds. My Glock? 3 seconds!
Do you have the original or the M2? The original was a joke requiring a tool to disassemble. The M2 just requires practice, but is still definitely more involved than other pistols like Glocks.
Love my PPQ
43 6 rds 43x 10 rds sounds like the ccp is in the middle
They make a CCP M2+ now. Like to see a comparison if any
Sadly, it seems like they didn’t make any really major changes, other than to the slide. I wish they took the opportunity to do a higher capacity magazine frame!
Since this is marketed towards people with less hand strength, that might be a reason for the single stack magazine. Much easier to load than a double stack. I have the M1 and it is quite easy to load the magazine without a loading tool
Mid-century Germany:. P-38 and Luger, 8 round magazines. Worked.
My wish for improving this gun are:
1)better trigger
2)threaded barrel
Is it reliable??
Boringly reliable
No
I carry..and shoot it just fine.. conceals fine w/Crossbreed holster. Can put 5 round in the X ring at 25 - 30 ft. the rest 10/9 rings occasional 8's when i flinch It shoots fine. Yeah trigger could be better but most CCP M1 shooters say they dont notice the squish when shooting it. (its more like grinding) But I have noticed it has wore over time and rounds and is even less now. Get it drop test fixed for free from Walther.
As with anything, it is a tool. Get to know its ability and see it for what it is. practice, practice, practice. - Ex Army
hairy ball grip
The resemblance is uncanny
@@booliganshootingsports some weird german science for sure
Every thing that Umarex makes in awful. If it doesn't have antlers on it then its not a real walther.
What's this single stack garbage? I daily conceal carry with a 2 16 round magazines.
i used a mechanical pencil and took mine down no need for the tool
That’s the thing, a mechanical pencil IS a tool. A gun should be able to be field stripped with nothing else required at all.
>demonstrating a gun with live rounds off the shooting range when you really don’t have to, flagging literally everything in the room including yourself
Never do this
Miss the part where I show that it was unloaded like 4 times? The magazine has rounds in it because… it’s my carry weapon that I literally pulled straight off my hip, ejected the round in the chamber, and filmed.
Rounds in a magazine don’t spontaneously fire themselves.
@@booliganshootingsports saw it every time. And put back in, and taken out, and put back in, without any regard where your muzzle was going. I will tell you plainly that a man who fiddles with a gun like that in my presence is not one I’ll ever shoot with. Think of me how you like, but that looks like unsafe handling to me and I wouldn’t trust you.
But hey, it’s your channel, and if I don’t like it I can just move on.
Again, bullets don’t magically jump from the magazine into the chamber without you chambering them. Notice how I didn’t chamber any rounds? Flagging the walls in my film studio with an empty chamber is really something you’re concerned about?
@@booliganshootingsports As a "live" demonstration of how you seem to think about gun handling? Yes.