The longest name of a single engine taildragger is looked over by Mark and taken for a spin around the patch. #pilot #stol #taildragger #airplane @skywagonuniversity5023
Nothing against Super Cubs but this aircraft is faster, roomier, has a better heater, is easier to get into, can do 95% of what a PA-18 can and costs less money to buy/insure. Having flown both (and being 6'5") I'll take the Champ.
I have a Larsen Luscombe, 0320. Great airplane. I actually felt the Luscombe was harder to climb into than the J3, lol... Anyway for me, it's all about the ailerons, and J3 wins that battle all day. But really, we're talking about personal airplanes - they're all great! If you ever get the chance to jump in a C85 J3, take it! I'm 6'1" and fall right into the back seat, no problem.
One of the things I find most interesting about the Citabrias is that the triangular frame in the empennage is a piece of design lineage that dates all the way back to the original Aeronca C-2 prototype that first flew in 1925.
@@johnlucas2037 that's interesting that it is that much more stout than a box like a Cub. I know when I look back in the tail of our Champ it looks like an 80 year old truss both delicate and reliable.
Wisconsin built 💪😁 One of the coolest acrobatic high wing monoplanes you could ever own, that can also pull duty as a bush plane. If I had the rubles, I'd be all over it.
1966 or maybe 1967 my instructor bought a new Citabria, 115 Hp. Great fun little bird. This video shows how much has changed, and how much has not changed.
Back in the 70's I had the opportunity to fly an Aeronca Champ and later a Citabria. If I were still flying, this airplane would be my choice. Thank you for this video and keep them coming. This one brought back some great memories.
Citabria was the first plane I got to fly when I was about 8yrs old. My fathers buddy owned one and took me up in it around Mt Shasta. This brought back some memories.
There is no such thing as a "Citabria Scout." The plane you flew is a CItabria High Country Explorer Model 7GCBC. A Scout is a 8GCBC. It has a constant speed prop, higher gross weight and larger fuel tanks. Due to the higher weight, I believe it is non-aerobatic.
The early 8GCBC is not even spin approved (don’t know about latter ones). Wings are longer, gear is taller than the 7 series. The early ones had the O-360 vs the O-320 in the 7GCBC. Later engine upgrades changed several times. The other 8 series aircraft is the 8KCAB Decathlon, not to be likewise confused with the 7KCAB. Both 8 series were type certified when Bellanca was building the Citabrias in the early 1970s.
Thanks for the video always enjoy your perspective on aircraft.. if I didn’t already own one I definitely would by the 170 you have listed.. thanks again for showing us this great bird 👍
Mark, I didn't see this one on your site. How much is it selling for. Funny enough, I fly out of Minden all the time and had no idea this was for sale.
Great video, started to wonder why I was watching a 15 min video on an aeroplane Ive owned for 13 years.. I guess you make good videos, wish I had the baggage door! What size tires are those on that model, 7.00 or 8.00? I have the factory 6.00 on my 79' GCBC and wish to go bigger due to my farm strip becoming more "rough" Im Glad ACA have kept is so simple even all these years later.. great stuff
@@skywagonuniversity5023 just joking…great videos btw. Since you’re listening, here’s something I’ve been wondering, the horsepower and size of the engine is always given, but not the torque. It seems like the single engine aircraft engines are designed for high torque and relatively low horsepower considering their size. Is that true? Thanks.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 I've always wondered why because a large displacement engine like the IO-360 makes only 200 hp at 2700rpm, but 350 lb ft of torque. A large displacement 4 cylinder low revving engine is made to produce a lot of torque with relatively low horsepower.
Love all the videos from Skywagon University. Please keep them coming. The phone ringing is the hallmark of the videos; they’re not a distraction 😊
Once is enough, twice is annoying. What reminds me to turn it off, is the first ring. Sorry.
Nothing against Super Cubs but this aircraft is faster, roomier, has a better heater, is easier to get into, can do 95% of what a PA-18 can and costs less money to buy/insure. Having flown both (and being 6'5") I'll take the Champ.
Sure, but J3 over original Champ any day.
Ahhh the age old J3/Champ debate... I'm sure I'd love the J3 more if I fit in one. I do love any Luscombe with a C85/90.
I have a Larsen Luscombe, 0320. Great airplane. I actually felt the Luscombe was harder to climb into than the J3, lol... Anyway for me, it's all about the ailerons, and J3 wins that battle all day. But really, we're talking about personal airplanes - they're all great!
If you ever get the chance to jump in a C85 J3, take it! I'm 6'1" and fall right into the back seat, no problem.
You nailed it. They are all Great.
It breaks my heart I don't fit in a J3 - we have one with an O-200 and I "fit" but just can't move my feet for any rudder control.
One of the things I find most interesting about the Citabrias is that the triangular frame in the empennage is a piece of design lineage that dates all the way back to the original Aeronca C-2 prototype that first flew in 1925.
If it works, why change it.
What is remarkable is how all the 7's from the 7AC Champ to now are built on the same type certificate.
A triangle boom is one of the best designs for twisting loads.
@@johnlucas2037 that's interesting that it is that much more stout than a box like a Cub. I know when I look back in the tail of our Champ it looks like an 80 year old truss both delicate and reliable.
Wisconsin built 💪😁 One of the coolest acrobatic high wing monoplanes you could ever own, that can also pull duty as a bush plane. If I had the rubles, I'd be all over it.
Me too.
Production value is skyrocketing! Thank you for your videos.
Thank you for the compliment! - Don the Camera Guy.
1966 or maybe 1967 my instructor bought a new Citabria, 115 Hp. Great fun little bird. This video shows how much has changed, and how much has not changed.
Just a bigger engine and some avionics.
Part 141 college in East Texas requires all students to learn on a Citabria. Looks like a fun plane. Thanks for the review.
Learning in a tailwheel is a good idea. Makes a better pilot. Like learning to drive in a manual/stick car.
Back in the 70's I had the opportunity to fly an Aeronca Champ and later a Citabria. If I were still flying, this airplane would be my choice. Thank you for this video and keep them coming. This one brought back some great memories.
Thanks for sharing!
Sweet Bird! Nice job Mark!
That’s how it’s done Mark and what a Beautiful Wheel Landing
Thanks.
Love this Aircraft but my choice is the Cessna 180
Beautiful plane. Thank you Mark
Very welcome
Love the detailed information which makes aviation more interesting. 👍
Wheels it on like a boss 😅
Oh yes. Wheelers.
Citabria was the first plane I got to fly when I was about 8yrs old. My fathers buddy owned one and took me up in it around Mt Shasta. This brought back some memories.
That would be something in a Citabria. Shasta is a big Volcano with permanent snow on it. I flew into the crater of Mt St Helens once.
If I were in the market for an airplane, I would be calling you about this one!!
Always loved the Citabria's! They got too $$$$ for me though, and of course always on the other side of the continent! 🤣 Great video!
late ones like this are pricey but when you fly it you feel why.
There is no such thing as a "Citabria Scout." The plane you flew is a CItabria High Country Explorer Model 7GCBC. A Scout is a 8GCBC. It has a constant speed prop, higher gross weight and larger fuel tanks. Due to the higher weight, I believe it is non-aerobatic.
My error on the title. I've corrected it from 8 to 7. - Don the Camera Guy.
The early 8GCBC is not even spin approved (don’t know about latter ones). Wings are longer, gear is taller than the 7 series. The early ones had the O-360 vs the O-320 in the 7GCBC. Later engine upgrades changed several times. The other 8 series aircraft is the 8KCAB Decathlon, not to be likewise confused with the 7KCAB. Both 8 series were type certified when Bellanca was building the Citabrias in the early 1970s.
Enjoyed your Video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
It wouldn't be a genuine Skywagon University Video without a phone call.
Damn, it's almost a trademark now...........
And it's the classic 'ringer sound' that we oldies grew up with the landline phones.. it matches the classic big band intro. 😊
Thanks for the video always enjoy your perspective on aircraft.. if I didn’t already own one I definitely would by the 170 you have listed.. thanks again for showing us this great bird 👍
Thanks for watching!
Beautiful airplane !!
110kts is faster than I expected! acrobatic high country. cool. (lol, your phone)
Thanks. damn phone.
Mark another great video, you need to ask your wife to stop ringing you to pick milk up on way home! All the best from New Zealand👍
Ha, yes. It looks staged but it isn't. I forget and the ringing reminds me and by then it is too late.
That's a super aircraft 👍
I always visually verify control surface movement. Imagine pulling back and not moving elevator.
very wise.
A lovely aeroplane, old lineage. I bet you don't miss blighty in November, cold and wet now, nights drawing in😉😀
Bit parky here too in the evening, frost at night but warm days. Gets dark at 5,30pm now.
Love the content! Keep it up thank you
Another great video... and another phone call. :P
Always.
Thank you for the videos you upload.
Glad you like them!
Nice Bird. Enjoyed
I thought they switched to aluminum gear legs in 2004. He said “spring steel legs”. I could be wrong.
Maybe they are Aluminum.
I like it!
Very nice looking plane.
Many thanks!
Another GREAT video, Mark! And I don't believe you that the phone calls aren't staged. LOL!!!
They are totally random.
An older friend of mine has one I think it’s a 2020 he let me fly it. I was amazed at the visibility and control on the ground Beautiful plane.
Nice to see what they are like when new.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 First new plane I ever flew, I knew was 20 years old when I was flying a lot.
Mark, This is a High Country Citabria, Not a Scout. The Scout is the 8GCBC. Two different models buddy. Great video!!
Thanks for the info!
I really like this airplane. Oh, to be young again…
It was a nice one.
I think I blacked out from all the "toob" talk...14:44 YES I was scared AND a second one!
Choob or Toob. sorry, it's one word I can't do. I do say aluminum tho'
Love your videos! Happy to come over one day, and show you how to put your phone on vibrate 🙂
Please do!
Mark, I didn't see this one on your site. How much is it selling for. Funny enough, I fly out of Minden all the time and had no idea this was for sale.
It was only on there a short time and a buyer appeared.
Great video, started to wonder why I was watching a 15 min video on an aeroplane Ive owned for 13 years.. I guess you make good videos, wish I had the baggage door! What size tires are those on that model, 7.00 or 8.00? I have the factory 6.00 on my 79' GCBC and wish to go bigger due to my farm strip becoming more "rough" Im Glad ACA have kept is so simple even all these years later.. great stuff
They are great planes.
Tube. Perfect. Proper English pronunciation.
That's the plane I want to own.
What's with the goofy 172 yokes? Never noticed that on the later 180s. Why wouldn't they put on the bigger one from the 182/206/210?
In a 180?
👍
This is AC/DC Citabria
Any chance to see Yak-18T or Yak-52 scrutinized?
Only if one arrives here either with an owner or for sale.
I didn't think Scouts were aerobatic...?
It's got a G meter in it and some maneuvering speeds.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 Oh, I see the title change now, it's a Citabria, got it.
🥰❤🥰
yes. it was great.
0:25 You thought about pushing in the throttle and blasting off right there didn't you?!
Erm, yes, I kind of did.
How much shorter can this land than a 7gcaa?
96 feet less. apparently.
Choobs?
Yes. The T is a silent "CH"
How do you get people to call you, during the video, to buy the plane you just demo'd?! :^). :poke:
Not kidding, the damn thing rings all the time.
It's not a SCOUT
Correct.
Next time do some stunts!
Not in other people's planes. Sorry.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 just joking…great videos btw. Since you’re listening, here’s something I’ve been wondering, the horsepower and size of the engine is always given, but not the torque. It seems like the single engine aircraft engines are designed for high torque and relatively low horsepower considering their size. Is that true? Thanks.
People do not really ever talk about Torque in planes.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 I've always wondered why because a large displacement engine like the IO-360 makes only 200 hp at 2700rpm, but 350 lb ft of torque. A large displacement 4 cylinder low revving engine is made to produce a lot of torque with relatively low horsepower.