My Stance on Daniel Haqiqatjou [Madkhalis vs Khawarij]
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 11. 2022
- My Stance on Daniel Haqiqatjou [Madkhalis vs Khawarij]
Your support helps the dawah, jazakumAllahukhairan 🤝:
❤️ Patreon: / ilmstitute
GoFundMe: www.gofundme.com/f/ilmstitute...
PayPal: www.paypal.me/ilmstitute
CashApp: cash.app/$BrotherSaajid
CZcams Membership: / @saajidlipham
📚 Islamic Classes: courses.ilmstitute.com
👕 Merch! (shirts, hoodies, etc.): teespring.com/stores/ilmstitute
🔗 Social Media:
📱 Facebook: / brothersaajid
📱 Twitter: / saajidlipham
📷 Instagram: / brothersaajid
💻 Website: www.ilmstitute.com
🔈 Soundcloud: / user-1260072
🔈 Podcast: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said: "The best Jihad is a word of truth in front of an oppressive ruler." (Tirmidhi)
So Daniel should go to the ruler and speak the truth then. How is talking about their faults online going to do anything? Where is the jihad in that?
He will immediately be executed if he does that. So that's not a viable option.
Ok.. So go to him and say it to him.. Otherwise be quiet
@@revivalist355 that's DH problem..
@@barryirlandi4217 where does it say it's forbidden to criticize rulers? Especially if they are as corrupt and unislamic as mbs and mbz?
The whole issue arose when DH criticized KSA for Halloween and people started labelling him khariji, is it incorrect to criticize a ruler for openly promoting pagan rituals among Muslims?
First of all you don't even know if the government permitted the event. Secondly, rulers are to be advised privately as per the hadith of the prophet upon whom be peace.
@@aaliyah3037 The government is promoting much worse events through هيئة الترفيه and are imprisoning any sheikh that is simply opposing haram without even talking about the so called “rulers”
@@user-vs2ln6vg1r Scholars have always been imprisoned by rulers throughout the history of Islam. This is nothing new. Everyone will answer for their actions on the day of judgement but we must follow the sunnah of prophet upon whom be peace.
@@aaliyah3037 Do you know the difference between imprisoning scholars because the ruler is unjust and imprisoning them because they are fighting the spread of kufr?
If the ruler is unjust this doesn’t mean that you can rebel against him but if he is a murtad that destroys the religion then you HAVE TO! (I’m against rebellions btw☺️)
You talk about the Sunnah so much but have no khaira غيرة to defend islam against distortion!
@@user-vs2ln6vg1r Then please start rebelling against the ruler in your country. I'm sure things are worse there and have been for a longer time than Saudi. Places in the gulf, Turkey, Malaysia, the former USSR states , European muslim nations all have worse going on for years now
Daniels work is the most potent Dawah on YouT, even if ur not a muslim... his disection of Liberalism and exposoing the onslaught against traditional values is vital to ppl waking up to the reality of the situation
@@ZaynElAbideen can you give example (how women are oppressed according to his dawah)?
Him engaging in debate with a woman ( feminist and hijabi) says a lot about his understanding . Who does that ? It shows some or most of his actions are somehow questionable. Beside his manners are really provocative and triggering. His replying non muslims with comments like “ seethe lol “” says he somehow needs to upgrade his manner . Where Allah instructed Musa ( as) to use softer tone with pharaoh when dealing with him so that pharaoh may understand and comprehend. Him always issuing feminist are the culprit but forgetting that man are also the problem is painful to digest . Some of this feminism actually arisen from their husbands abuse and lack of take care from their fathers or seeing personal relatives suffering from close males.
@@ZaynElAbideen Yet his wife and he graduated from harvard university, how ironic. Had he and his wife not had the education they were privileged to have they wouldn't be able to engage with anyone like the way do.
@@ZaynElAbideen you just make statements without explaining nothing
@@ZaynElAbideen no why is that relevant, i am just commenting on your comment under this post
Allah knows who is right but my gut feelings tells as soon as Daniel criticized KSA for the Halloween 🎃then all of sudden he is labelled kawaarij, what am I missing here ?
This is a way older problen than halloweev. Watch onewaytoparadise on daniel and you will know(this vid is way older)
This about manhaj and aqidah. Many don't follow the salaf as-salih so they are quick to make takfir upon rulers and sadly end up becoming extreme like the khawarij
Ur missing Quran and sunnah
Talking of Muslim rulers. If a ruler lines himself with Israel, supports them and says we need to change and edit some things in our religion. Going against him is haram?
Rulers are not angels, we want them to stay, but to break the ruler for reasons
For example, Erdogan says Israel is our friend and still supports secularism, and one of the largest Justice and Development Party says that we do not want to prevent the role of prostitution in Turkey on a live broadcast on an Arab channel.
Do you support the overthrow of President Erdogan and his party because of what they say and because of their actions as well, as many Turkish companies deal with the Zionist entity?
@@user-kj8yl6sn2z what erdogan did will forever be wrong. But it’s not the worst thing that happened. Other rulers like sisi and bin zayed literally sent forces to help zionists as well as they say we need to pick things in Islam and leave things.
What is the sunnah for advicing ruler?
watch this, exactly he's a neo-salafi czcams.com/video/_yDfnYnvPh0/video.html
Any "muslim" ruler who allied to the zionist belong to the zionists. Al Maidah 51. Can we agree on that?
Daniel haqiqatjou is less harmful to the ummah than those that worship the rulers who build idols build temples and promote shirk. May allah curse be upon those that worship the rulers.The prophet may peace and blessing be upon him warned against them and those who will do shirk
Daniel didn't make any takfir. He condemn all sorts of violence against the rulers. The so-called "harmless criticism" is haram according to the hadiths so please stop using emotional appeal. Actually, it's not harmless because you are inciting violence (even though he condemns it) just as the liberals are inciting freedom when they unwantedly (like Daniel) incite the destruction of society.
No one warship rulers .. shhay Rabee Al-madkhali, Shaykh Fawzan never supported anything wrong done by rulers ..
But
I have watched few videos of real learned ulamas..most of them said similar to what brother Saajid have explained. Muslims please do your research. Look at syria, libya and yaman..anything good come from rebellions? People are more divided than before. They used to have beautiful country people able to practice the religion now what happened. Children died from hunger and other bad things happen to muslims.
@@xshiro83 you think Muslims were better off before The wars? Do you not see the corruption all around the world since over 100 years? If the objective in Islam is to prevent war and suffering then why did the prophet and his followers go through a lot of war and suffering? Allah says corruption/trials/fitna is worse then death. Protecting your faith is more important than to die as a kafir or even a bad Muslim.
@@xshiro83 "Look at syria, libya and yemen."
yea n i saw wahhabi munafiqs.
Much needed education the masses on these topics! Alhamdulillah! May Allah Aza wajjal continue to bless this channel and grant Br. Saajid peace and protection and keep us all on the Straight Path! Ameen!
Sadly I feel there are some weird indications here by brother Sajid which he himself says is wrong and then I feel he again indicates it in the video:
1 Criticism of Evil or standing against establishing evil or prohibition of govt established evils, like shirki festivals etc, Sajid equates it to instigation to rebellion against govt in the vid
As if there is only two categories, either stay quite - ignore or Rebel and there's no third or 4th category at all?
رأى عمارة بن رويبة بشر بن مروان وهو يدعو في يوم جمعة، فقال عمارة: قبح الله هاتين اليدين
2 Saajid says, yes as ahlul sunnah we do takfeer at times, but yet kind of indicates in the rest of his speech that merely making Takfeer is rhetoric of the Khwarij, contradicting the ahlul sunnah.
وقال يحيى بن عيسى الرملي عن الأعمش اختلفوا في الحجاج فسألوا مجاهداً فقال تسألون عن الشيخ الكافر، وروى ابن عساكر عن الشعبي أنه قال: الحجاج مؤمن بالجبت والطاغوت كافر بالله العظيم كذا قال والله أعلم،
3 Sajid indicates prohibition of evil and forbidding evil of the govt leads to bloodshed etc, this is apparently a "lazim" and this isn't necessarily true. Some real khwarij minded ppl use similar "lawazim" and say "so and so's end path destination is be kufr as the system leads to it in the end so let's make takfeer from now itself"
4 Saajid completely ignores some of the acts that tantamount to disbelief (as stated by scholars, not merely sins) being promoted by these govts (like taking part in opening temples, taking pharaohs of our times as close allies while opening military bases for them and supporting these pharaohs in their wars on other Muslims etc).
وقال أبو الحسن الأشعريُّ: (إرادة الكُفر كفرٌ، وبناء كنيسة يُكفَر فيها بالله كُفر؛ لأنَّه إرادة الكفر)( [20]).
However, Just for who's reading in general, sometimes someone may fall into kufr and may not be judged as a kafir due to the obstacles of takfeer.
5 There are other acts which these govts do like making allowed what is agreed upon as haram and indicating it "moderate islam", raising statues where ppl can make a wish (for entertainment purposes) , allowing celebrating Halloween, allowing and establishing free mixing with music etc, in the country BY LAW, .. etc. And ignoring these and keep on mentioning abt takfeer due to mere SINS and not looking at the reality of some of the govts in deep manner on how they are disabled by their Western masters etc is a sad approach on reality!
6 Sajid Indicates that this rhetoric is made by a minor proportion of 'khwarij influenced' ' youth only, but if you see there are scholars who are much well versed and more deeper in knowledge than Sajid who have these views and criticise govt openly in many issues : Shaikh Ali alKhudair or Nasser alFahd or Shaikh Sulaiman Ulwan or Shaikh Tarefe, Dr. Hani sibai, Dr. tariq abdelhaleem, Shaikh Ahmad alKhaldi, Shaikh Ahmad Jibril, Shaikh Dedo alShinqitee, Shaikh Safar alHawali etc. Obviously many of the bolder scholars don't get platforms and are in jail so their knowledge of reality or ijtihadat or completely made to be hidden from the masses. I'm not saying all of these scholars have right stances, I'm just saying prohibiting public evil publicly or calling against establishing Haram as permissible in the country isn't just done by random bunch of khwarij minded youth. And if some scholars consider some acts as kufr and call out kufr as kufr it doesn't mean it is rebellious or that they are khwarij. In certain situations it is normal for scholars to disagree on ruling of a ruler, like what happened at the time of Hajjaj Bin Yusuf alThaqafi
7 I agree there are a lot of youth who are not grounded in these issues and may cause wrong takfeer and May not understand the political reality and difficulties some govts face, and may demand every sin to be removed from society with force, or else actually call for rebellion while we are in a weak state etc. But maybe rather than banishing them, maybe teach them how and to what extent is our responsibility in explaining the deen when these evils are apparent and how to prohibit the evil without causing a bigger evil, (not just ignore the elephant in the room, just so it isn't considered as '' inciting against govt'', like many pro Saudi preachers do, making it easy for the govts to keep establishing new falsehood more easily step by step)... and it is also important to teach when a govt is excused if it actually just ignores some evil due to slack or less eman and its' difference between making some evil as law and establishing it by the govt in the country.
and jazakAllah khair, but maybe we can disagree on your stances on the way to approach the evils of these govt depending on your knowledge of their realities, it doesn't always have to be deviance and khwarij vs irja
wallah a3lam
.
👍
some interesting points raised
JazakAllah khair
@@itqantraining2937 wa iyk
👌
Wisdom of Rasulullah (s.a.w) is just miraculous and impeccable
Subhanallah!
Baraka Allahu fik brother sajid.clear and understood.keep on making such necessary videos.May Allah reward you.ameen.
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
May Almighty ALLAH bless and grant success to Brother Saajid on his Islamic endeavours, and lead him to the highest level of Paradise, Jannatul Firdaus. Ameen. Love for the sake of ALLAH. from Mindanao, Southern Philippines
Hold on, so DH is not qualified to criticise rulers, so why were you silent when he was criticising duatt? Was he qualified for that?
BarakAllahfeek Akhi Saajid this will Insha Allah will educate those who don't know their religion
Jazakallahu khair brother May Allah reward you in abundance for the spreading the truth and keep you firm on the straight path ameen
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
Both you and him have been a great source of knowledge for me so I really hope that Allah swt guides Daniel and both you and him can be united upon haqq.
I don't see why he needs to stop promoting Daniel. The spectre of liberalism is huge and the people speaking against it are few. These two agree about everything, but Daniel thinks it's okay to criticize the ruler of Saudi Arabia (who is not his own ruler) for approving shirk and Saajid does not. Both of them believe Halloween celebrating to be shirk, both believe liberalism to be wrong for the world, both believe abundantly in the Quran and Sunnah, but over this little issue (imo not an issue at all) they will separate. Very sad
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
@@fark69 “Whoever intends to advise one with authority on a matter, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909
@@fark69 Is this the reason Saajid distanced himself from Daniel? Over the Halloween video? Or is there more?
@@Sarah.G_2 Daniel seems to attack any Muslim scholar for any view they have that he doesn't like.
Alhamdulillah..
I was waiting for that. May Allah bless you brother Sajjad. Plz try to reach to him in private and discuss because i can see that he is a sincere guy and i think he will not refuse Haq.
May Allah bless you. People don't understand how difficult what u have just explained.
I arree, he seems to have some sincerity at face value. May Allah guide us and him!
Brother Sajid always makes things clear Masha'Allah.
Recomment of another comment which I think got sidelined!
" Sadly I feel there are some weird indications here by brother Sajid despite him himself initially saying that it isnt the case, yet it seems he indicates otherwise
:
1 Criticism of Evil or standing against establishing evil or prohibition of govt established evils, like shirki festivals etc, Sajid equates it to instigation to rebellion against govt in the vid
As if there is only two categories, either stay quite - ignore or Rebel and there's no third or 4th category at all?
رأى عمارة بن رويبة بشر بن مروان وهو يدعو في يوم جمعة، فقال عمارة: قبح الله هاتين اليدين
2 Saajid says, yes as ahlul sunnah we do takfeer at times, but yet kind of indicates in the rest of his speech that merely making Takfeer is rhetoric of the Khwarij, contradicting the ahlul sunnah.
وقال يحيى بن عيسى الرملي عن الأعمش اختلفوا في الحجاج فسألوا مجاهداً فقال تسألون عن الشيخ الكافر، وروى ابن عساكر عن الشعبي أنه قال: الحجاج مؤمن بالجبت والطاغوت كافر بالله العظيم كذا قال والله أعلم،
3 Sajid indicates prohibition of evil and forbidding evil of the govt leads to bloodshed etc, this is apparently a "lazim" and this isn't necessarily true. Some real khwarij minded ppl use similar "lawazim" and say "so and so's end path destination is be kufr as the system leads to it in the end so let's make takfeer from now itself"
4 Saajid completely ignores some of the acts that tantamount to disbelief (as stated by scholars, not merely sins) being promoted by these govts (like taking part in opening temples, taking pharaohs of our times as close allies while opening military bases for them and supporting these pharaohs in their wars on other Muslims etc).
وقال أبو الحسن الأشعريُّ: (إرادة الكُفر كفرٌ، وبناء كنيسة يُكفَر فيها بالله كُفر؛ لأنَّه إرادة الكفر)( [20]).
However, Just for who's reading in general, sometimes someone may fall into kufr and may not be judged as a kafir due to the obstacles of takfeer.
5 There are other acts which these govts do like making allowed what is agreed upon as haram and indicating it "moderate islam", raising statues where ppl can make a wish (for entertainment purposes) , allowing celebrating Halloween, allowing and establishing free mixing with music etc, in the country BY LAW, .. etc. And ignoring these and keep on mentioning abt takfeer due to mere SINS and not looking at the reality of some of the govts in deep manner on how they are disabled by their Western masters etc is a sad approach on reality!
6 Sajid Indicates that this rhetoric is made by a minor proportion of 'khwarij influenced' ' youth only, but if you see there are scholars who are much well versed and more deeper in knowledge than Sajid who have these views and criticise govt openly in many issues : Shaikh Ali alKhudair or Nasser alFahd or Shaikh Sulaiman Ulwan or Shaikh Tarefe, Dr. Hani sibai, Dr. tariq abdelhaleem, Shaikh Ahmad alKhaldi, Shaikh Ahmad Jibril, Shaikh Dedo alShinqitee, Shaikh Safar alHawali etc. Obviously many of the bolder scholars don't get platforms and are in jail so their knowledge of reality or ijtihadat or completely made to be hidden from the masses. I'm not saying all of these scholars have right stances, I'm just saying prohibiting public evil publicly or calling against establishing Haram as permissible in the country isn't just done by random bunch of khwarij minded youth. And if some scholars consider some acts as kufr and call out kufr as kufr it doesn't mean it is rebellious or that they are khwarij. In certain situations it is normal for scholars to disagree on ruling of a ruler, like what happened at the time of Hajjaj Bin Yusuf alThaqafi
7 I agree there are a lot of youth who are not grounded in these issues and may cause wrong takfeer and May not understand the political reality and difficulties some govts face, and may demand every sin to be removed from society with force, or else actually call for rebellion while we are in a weak state etc. But maybe rather than banishing them, maybe teach them how and to what extent is our responsibility in explaining the deen when these evils are apparent and how to prohibit the evil without causing a bigger evil, (not just ignore the elephant in the room, just so it isn't considered as '' inciting against govt'', like many pro Saudi preachers do, making it easy for the govts to keep establishing new falsehood more easily step by step)... and it is also important to teach when a govt is excused if it actually just ignores some evil due to slack or less eman and its' difference between making some evil as law and establishing it by the govt in the country.
and jazakAllah khair, but maybe we can disagree on your stances on the way to approach the evils of these govt depending on your knowledge of their realities, it doesn't always have to be deviance and khwarij vs irja
wallah a3lam
👌
This talk reminds me of one of the most fundamental principles of Islam: moderation in everything.
Alhamdulillah, about time. We knew this and we are being cautious. Glad you're explaining it clearly for everyone
May Allah keep us all firmly upon the true path
ameen
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
Jazākum Allāh u Khāiran brother, may Allāh keep you and all of us steadfast on this Dīn of Allāh.
'Āmīn
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
Well said, May Allah bless you brother
May ALLAH keep us on the right path, Amiin.
ameen
Amin!
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
@@911mossadvanbombersclassif4
I honestly don’t know much about him, except couple videos, which one of them he sounded off and another he sounded credible. I’m just saying there so much mis information and deviation about everything including About Islam these days. And that can be confusing for people who are not scholars like me. Thus I’m praying for guidance.
Jazaka'allahu khairan brother sajid! You couldn't of explained it any better 🤝🏻 it's a honour
czcams.com/video/bzfN8kC9-Hw/video.html
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
@@TawheedPromoter you should recommend thalath usul and 4 principles of shirk by ibn Abdul Wahab...
a salat book of his or Albanis...
say thats beginning and then the next 4 books you mentioned as 2nd half grounding for beginners...
May Allah reward you for making it clearer for me, and hopefully for many others.
ameen
Is the rule in Saudi a rule established like how Abu Bakr and Umar RA established Khilafah? What about the ottomans?
Jazakallahu Khairan brother Saajid... Let us not forget to make Duaa for our brothers when they stumble... May Allah Guide us all and keep us steadfast upon the Truth... Excellent video.
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
@@MCXM111 May Allah forgive you and us.. beside your sarcasm and mockery, you should know that Saajid is not a salafi not does he label himself so. In fact Ali dawah and chamsi label themselves wahabi and salafi.
Allah said:
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ
O you who believe, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you.
Surat al-Nisa 4:59
Ibn Umar reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
السَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ عَلَى الْمَرْءِ الْمُسْلِمِ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ وَكَرِهَ مَا لَمْ يُؤْمَرْ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَإِذَا أُمِرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَلَا سَمْعَ وَلَا طَاعَةَ
Listening to and obeying the leader is an obligation upon a Muslim, whether he likes it or dislikes it, as long as he is not commanded to disobey Allah. If he is commanded to disobey, then there is no listening or obedience.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2796, Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ
Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my tradition (sunnah). Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.
I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said:
تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ
You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847, Grade: Sahih
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ
The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.
It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said:
لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ
No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855, Grade: Sahih
Umm Salamah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
سَتَكُونُ أُمَرَاءُ فَتَعْرِفُونَ وَتُنْكِرُونَ فَمَنْ عَرَفَ بَرِئَ وَمَنْ أَنْكَرَ سَلِمَ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ رَضِيَ وَتَابَعَ
There will be rulers from whom you will see both goodness and corruption. One who recognizes their evil and hates it will maintain his innocence, but one who is pleased with it and follows them will be sinful.
It was said, “Shall we not fight them?” The Prophet said:
لَا مَا صَلَّوْا
No, as long as they pray.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1854, Grade: Sahih
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
مَنْ خَرَجَ مِنَ الطَّاعَةِ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَمَاتَ مَاتَ مِيتَةً جَاهِلِيَّةً وَمَنْ قَاتَلَ تَحْتَ رَايَةٍ عُمِّيَّةٍ يَغْضَبُ لِعَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَدْعُو إِلَى عَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَنْصُرُ عَصَبَةً فَقُتِلَ فَقِتْلَةٌ جَاهِلِيَّةٌ وَمَنْ خَرَجَ عَلَى أُمَّتِي يَضْرِبُ بَرَّهَا وَفَاجِرَهَا وَلاَ يَتَحَاشَ مِنْ مُؤْمِنِهَا وَلاَ يَفِي لِذِي عَهْدٍ عَهْدَهُ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَلَسْتُ مِنْهُ
Whoever rejects obedience to the ruler and divides the community and dies will have died upon ignorance. Whoever fights under the banner of one who is blind, raging for the sake of tribalism, or calling to tribalism, or supporting tribalism, and is killed will have died upon ignorance. Whoever rebels against my nation, striking the righteous and wicked alike and sparing not even the believers and does not fulfill the pledge of security, then he has nothing to do with me and I have nothing to do with him.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1848, Grade: Sahih
Hasan al-Basri, may Allah have mercy on him, said:
لَوْ أَنَّ النَّاسَ إِذَا ابْتُلُوا مِنْ قِبَلِ سُلْطَانِهِمْ صَبَرُوا مَا لَبِثُوا أَنْ يُفْرَجَ عَنْهُمْ وَلَكِنَّهُمْ يَجْزَعُونَ إِلَى السَّيْفِ فَيُوَكَّلُونَ إِلَيْهِ فَوَاللَّهِ مَا جَاءُوا بِيَوْمِ خَيْرٍ قَطُّ
If the people had patience when they are being tested by their unjust ruler, it will not be long before Allah will give them a way out. However, they always rush to their swords, so they are left with their swords. By Allah, not even for a single day did they bring about any good.
Source: al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubrá 8789
And Fudayl ibn ‘Iyad, may Allah have mercy on him, said:
لَوْ أَنَّ لِي دَعْوَةً مُسْتَجَابَةً مَا جَعَلْتُهَا إِلَّا فِي إِمَامٍ فَصَلَاحُ الْإِمَامِ صَلَاحُ الْبِلَادِ وَالْعِبَادِ
If I had one supplication to be answered, I would make it for no one but the ruler. If the ruler is righteous then it will lead to the righteousness of the country and the people.
Source: Siyar A’lām al-Nubalā’ 8/434
And Imam al-Tahawi stated in his famous creed:
وَلَا نَرَى الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى أَئِمَّتِنَا وَوُلَاةِ أُمُورِنَا وَإِنْ جَارُوا وَلَا نَدْعُو عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا نَنْزِعُ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَتِهِمْ وَنَرَى طَاعَتَهُمْ مِنْ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَرِيضَةً مَا لَمْ يَأْمُرُوا بِمَعْصِيَةٍ وَنَدْعُو لَهُمْ بِالصَّلَاحِ وَالْمُعَافَاةِ
We do not recognize the rebellion against our leader or those in charge of our affairs even if they are unjust, nor do we wish evil for them, nor do we refuse to follow them. We hold that obedience to them is part of obedience to Allah the Exalted and therefore obligatory as long as they do not command us to commit sins. We pray for their right guidance and pardon.
Source: al-Aqīdah al-Ṭaḥāwiyyah
And Ahmad ibn Hanbal, may Allah have mercy on him, said:
لَا يُتَعَرَّضُ بِالسُّلْطَانِ فَإِنَّ سَيْفَهُ مَسْلُولٌ
Do not confront the ruler, for his sword is unsheathed.
Source: Jāmi’ al-‘Ulūm wal-Ḥikam34
Jazaka Allah khair akhi but Daniel didn't make takfir on a muslim ruler he pointed out that Halloween is haram and criticize saudi government for pushing it, and I'm from 🇸🇦 and i testify what Daniel said was true, then a punch of saudi ppl came to him and said to him u r from khawarij, then Daniel said these guys are madkhalis which is obsoletely true, Halloween shouldn't be celebrated in muslims land it's a shirk festival and if the government is pushing it we have to enjoy goood and forbid evil, and that's exactly what Daniel did
يا اخي بارك الله فيك الإنكار العلني على الحكام المسلمين شرعاً لا يجوز الا في حالات معينة مثلاً ان تكون عنده و ان تؤمن الفتنة ، لكن انك تنكر عليه في المنابر و وسائل الإعلام فهذا حرام ، و اما قولك هؤلاء مداخلة لانهم ينكرون على أمثال دانيال هذا ، فهذا ظلم منك
@@mohammedahmed1109 بارك الله فيك وانا اتفق معك ان الانكار على الحكام يكون خاصا في اغلب الحالات لكن اللذي يجعل الناس تنكر علنا هو لان الدولة تريد الاحتفال بهذا الاحتفال الشركي واساسه شرك في الله تعالى لكي يعرف العامة هذا الامر وكل من انكر في بلاد الحرمين الشريفين ذهبوا الى السجن فلم يبقى الا هذا ليس هناك خيار اخر لان من يكتم علما سوف يلجم بلجام من النار يوم الحساب واذا سكتنا سيظن اهل الباطل انهم على حق، الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر واجب، واعظم الجهاد هو كلمة حق عند سلطان جائر هذا حديث الرسول محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم والله اعلم
@@muslim_kun اخي بارك الله فيك ، العلماء يحذرون من هذه الأمور و لله الحمد لم يسجنوا ، اغلب الذين سجنوا هم من الاخوان المسلمين و السروريين الذين لا يحذرون من المنكرات فقط بل يعرضون بالحكام، و يا أخي حذر من الشرك ، حذر من المنكرات و صدقني لن يعترض عليك أحد لكن حذاري ان تكون سبباً في التفريق بين جماعة المسلمين
@@mohammedahmed1109 والله اني احس الكلام طالع من قلبك اخوي جزاك الله خير لكن من كثر السكوت عن السلطان اصبحت الامرات تفتع معابد هند سية واخاف من كثرة السكوت يعبد اللات والعزى عندنا وهذا حديث عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
0 - أنَّ النبيَّ صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ سئل أيُّ الجهادِ أفضلُ قال كلمةُ حقٍّ عند سلطانٍ جائرٍ
الراوي : طارق بن شهاب | المحدث : أبو حاتم الرازي | المصدر : المراسيل ابن أبي حاتم | الصفحة أو الرقم : 98 | خلاصة حكم المحدث : مرسل
@@muslim_kun أخي بارك الله فيك ، إقرأ تفسير العلماء للحديث الذي ذكرت، فالرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم قال " كلمة حق عند سلطان جائر " ، عند ولم يقل من وراء ولا في المنابر ، انما تكون عنده و المنكر بارك الله فيك لا يغير بالمنكر ، فالبلايا التي تحصل لا بمعصية الله و رسوله و إنما بالطرق الشرعية
But is keeping silent when some leaders allow the celebration of idolatry acts like Halloween in the land of Islam the way to go? How should such be approached?
Yes, you stay silent and focus on your family and friends. The Saudi scholars have warned against Halloween and other idolatrous festivals.
It is best to leave the criticism for the scholars in most cases but we definitely cannot criticize the rulers personally. That is a whole 'nother level! BarakAllahu Feek
@@aaliyah3037 Share links to the lectures, please!
May Allah bless you for this one 👍🏻
Mashallah you spoke about the big elephant in the room that people were using against.
I myself was scratching my head that you haven’t address it before but alhamdulilah it’s done and on top of that in a very nice educational way.
Allahumabarik
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
I Love both Daniel and your work. Daniel may not have Islamic study like you but he called out bravely enough all the Qoum lut imam and Sunnah frame work.
I've got to agree with Daniel I mean he just always makes sense to me
Wow. Subhaanallah. This is powerful. Your position is more than clear. Jazaakallahu Khairan
Jazak Allah khaira, never I find myself in a disagreement with Sajid logic. اسال الله ان يحفظك ويحعلك مما قال فيهم الرسول، من يرد الله له خيرا يفقهه في الدين
i liked saajid alot too.. but he is absolutely wrong about daniel .. watch daniel's response to saajid. all doubts cleared alhamdulillaah
اللهم أرنا الحق حقا وارزقنا اتباعه و أرنا الباطل باطلا و ارزقنا اجتنابه جزاك الله خيرا أخي ساجد تحية لك من المغرب 🇲🇦
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
They say: “They Are Jaamis and They Are Madkhalis.” | Shaykh Sālih al-Fawzān czcams.com/video/GgH8ewpbyzM/video.html
هل تعلم صانع هذا العلم الطاغوتي الذي هو سايكس بيكو احدى شخصيات الاعور اذا انت تحي بتحيته وتدعوا الله الاولى ان تكفر بعلم الدجال اولا ثم تدعوا الله
@@erenjageralmuhed6029 هو فقط قال من اين هو في جزء من الكرة الارضية ووضع علم يخص ذلك المكان ولم يقدس العلم ولم يقدس سايكس بيكو يا ساذج، قبل ان تاتي مهرولا للتكفير والتشكيك بايمان وتوحيد مسلم من المسلمين فقط لاجل قوله انه من المغرب ووضع علم خاص به، تعلم انت التوحيد وشروط التكفير وشروط الايمان بالله، لا اعتقد ان من شروط الايمان بالله ان تقول انا اكفر بسايكس بيكو، لان هنالك مسلمين لا يعرفون ما هو سايكس بيكو فهل هم كفار لمجرد جهلهم بهذا؟؟؟؟؟ خسئت والله. تضع شروطك للايمان وتضع شروط للدعاء والتحية دون اي دليل من القرآن والسنة؟ انت من ألف ديناً جديداً يتطلب منك ان تكفر بسايكس بيكو وان وضع العلم موجب للتشكيك بتوحيدك وايمانك، يالك من ساذج.
اخي ممكن توضح هو في هذا الفيديو يمدح دانيال أو يذمه؟؟
May Allah Subḥānahu wa-taʿālā guide brother Danial he loves Allah and his messenger I hope he can take from the loving advice
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
Since when criticism is khurooj?
Since when was it not
Imagine if scholar said bad things on ruler on public in jumaa or on tv whats goin to happen innthat countrey any thing could happen
I have been waiting your response about this matter, alhamdulillah you keep steadfast upon manhaj, may Allah preserve us
Muhammad hijab, ali dawah, smile to jannah brother, makin lama makin jelas mereka bukan manhaj salafy melainkan manhaj IM.
Shamsi memang sejak dulu bilang mereka akrab dgn IM di Inggris.
Kita dukung dakwah mereka kepada orang kafir, tapi dakwah mereka bermanhaj IM kita tentang secara terbuka
@@hotaryuzaki What is IM bro
@@hotaryuzaki that is why there is saying that we have to choose friends wisely
JazakAllahukhairan brother, a reminder to the viewers who obsess over some of these topics and neglect basic fiqh like how to pay zakat or perform proper Tahara, just remember that's what you will be asked about before you are (if you are) asked about your stance on Muslim leaders while living in a western country.
Daniel Haqiqitou doesn't know the traps of the Madkhalis. He has gheera for Islam, and many young brothers with similar love for Islam may state things that will be used as soundbites until it harms their public image. They want victory for Islam but may end up with khawarij types of people due to anger and impatience and that is a trial.
The madkhalis attach themselves to Salafis, thereby shielding themselves from missiles when people attack them, because the people firing missiles at them might missfire and instead of hitting the madkhali target, they hit the Salafiyyah wall behind instead. That's what Daniel fell into. Therefore you have to be very knowledgeable of the Usool and 'Aqidah of the Salafis in order to deal with the madkhalis. Some of them are knowledgeable hypocrites. Those outside Salafiyyah will be defeated by the madkhalis. So the ones to expose the madkhalis has to be the moderate Salafis who understand their traps.
Instead of attacking a ruler, because this is not our position, nor is it helpful for Islam to displace Muslims until they beg disbelievers to let them into their countries. Instead of doing that, the way you deal with madkhalis is to ask them why the rulers they give allegiance to are building hedonistic cities for disbelievers, lgbt etc but not a Hijrah place for them? Why isn't Rabee' Al-Madkhali telling them to make Hijrah to him? Those are the ways I use. And they can't answer them. Then I tell them, would you give allegiance to a Sunni Muslim ruler for the Sunni Muslims of the west once we reach an ijma' (consensus) by the believers living in the west? If he says no, then he's the khaariji. That's an easier way to deal with the madkhalis. But contradicting a Saheeh Hadith from the Prophet ﷺ, then you're finished. And that's what young brothers who want victory for Islam but seek it through other paths, should becareful of. One disobedience is at it took for the calamity at Uhud. Imagine the calamity that would ensue from rebellion and revolutions. We are not anarchists or communists. But should have Sabr, and go through legal ways, that would make Muslim rulers even help you.
_Eemaan vs 'Irja vs Nifaq vs Kufr_
_1. Eemaan (Faith) according to Islam is:_
(a) Belief in the heart, (b) utterance of the tongue and (c) actions of the limbs.
For example, (a) you believe in Allah ﷻ and the Last Day _in your heart,_ (b) then you bore testimony of that _with your tongue_ i.e. the Shahada (testimony of Faith), (c) and then you implemented that belief on _the limbs_ like Praying 5 times a Day, fasting during Ramadan and paying Zakat until the light of Eemaan increased in your heart and you rejoiced. And then let's say you sinned, and felt that the light of Eemaan diminished. That's because the light of Eemaan increases with good deeds and obedience to Allah ﷻ and decreases with sins and disobedience. Repentance to Allah ﷻ is like polishing the dark stains, and doing good deeds, are like watering and planting the tree of Eemaan.
Therefore one could conclude that if someone is doing sins with his limbs or utters foul things from his mouth, then that eminates from what the heart contains. So if you want to see what a person has in his heart, then the speech of the tongue and actions of the limbs will testify to what his heart contains.
The early Muslims did not accept the testimony of those who committed sins in public. Nor were their Hadith accepted as it had an impact on their 'Adalah (integrity). One of the reason a Hadith is Da'eef (weak) is due to no 'Adalah (integrity) from the narrator. Whereas a Hadith with a person who has an upright 'Adalah, but a weak memory or didn't write it down properly, is called Munkar (rejected). Therefore the most upright Muslims with good 'Adalah (integrity) and Dhabt (accuracy, memory), are the Rijaal (narrators) of Al-Bukhari and Muslim رحمهما الله. Allah ﷻ protected His religion with the Isnad (chain) and the trustworthy narrators.
_2. The Murji'ah who commit 'irja say that Eemaan is:_
(a) Belief in _the heart,_ (b) utterance of _the tongue,_ but no actions of the limbs are required. This justifies sins. Because it renders those who are doing good deeds with their limbs equal in Faith with the sinners. Rendering doing good and sinning equal.
Christians are the greatest of the Murji'ah. They will tell people that only belief and testifying that Jesus عليه السلام is god will grant salvation. And that your actions won't mean anything as long as you take Jesus عليه السلام as your lord and saviour. They do irja' with shirk (polytheism).
_3. The munafiq (hypocrite)._
The hypocrite is someone who only utters with his tongue that he is a believer, but is actually a disbeliever in his heart, and he does not have any deeds on his limbs, or he does deeds on the limbs in order to show off or in order to shield himself from being exposed. The early hypocrites had to appear in the Mosques lest they were exposed as disbelievers, but today you won't find them there. These are worse than the idolaters and always work with the apartheid tribesmen, and will have the lowest depth of the Fire. Examples of them in our times are Maajid Nawaaz and Qanta Ahmed who actually do work for them, the former even funded by the rothschilds, and the latter, look up the things that she combats on her twitter. It is like the laws of physics, that a munafiq (hypocrite) or a murtad (apostate) sides and works for the jews by default.
Allah سبحانه وتعالى said,
وَإِذَا لَقُوا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا قَالُوا آمَنَّا وَإِذَا خَلَوْا إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ قَالُوا إِنَّا مَعَكُمْ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ مُسْتَهْزِئُونَ
And when they (munafiqeen - hypocrites) meet those who believe, they say: "We believe," but when they are alone with their Shayateen (devils), they say: "Surely we are with you; verily, we were only mocking (that we are with the Muslims)." [Al-Baqarah 2:14]
_Who are "their Shayateen (devils)"?_
From Abu Maalik Ghazwan Al-Ghifaari رحمه الله regarding Allah's ﷻ Words:
﴿وَإِذَا خَلَوْا إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ﴾
And when they are alone with their Shayateen (devils). [Al-Baqarah 2:14]
He said:
مضوا
They went ahead:
﴿إِلَىٰ شَيَاطِينِهِمْ﴾
to their Shayateen (devils). [Al-Baqarah 2:14]
يعني: رؤوس اليهود, و كعب بن الأشرف
Meaning: the heads of the Jews, and Ka'b Ibn Al-Ashraf."
[Tafsir Ibn Abi Haatim 1/47]
_4. The kuffar (disbelievers)._
They have no belief in the heart, nor utterance of the tongue as they rejected Eemaan (Faith), nor any good deeds on the limbs but only sins until it darkened the heart and all kinds of pains therein emerged, depressions, anxieties etc in order to give them a U-turn sign that they are on the wrong path and need to leave that path, yet they return not, but cling on to quick fixes of brief lusts and desires, and continue in the dark path until the edge (death) after having passed by all the U-turn signs.
_Conclusion:_
Mankind consists of these types. Become Muslims O people so that you will taste the key to Paradise i.e. the light of Eemaan.
Only the Malãa'ikah (angels), the Prophets and Believers have the light of Eemaan inside their hearts, but the levels of Eemaan differ. For example, Jibreel (Gabriel) عليه السلام descended and brought a vessel of gold filled with Eemaan (Faith) and Hikmah (wisdom) and then opened up the chest of the Prophet ﷺ and poured it into his noble heart. And the Sahaba (Companions of the Prophet ﷺ) رضي الله عنهم were asked if they used to laugh? And it was said, yes, while their Eemaan was similar to the mountains.
If you believe in the 6 Pillars of Eemaan (Faith), and you practice the 5 Pillars of Islam sincerely without showing off, then you will attain Eemaan inside the heart and you'll enjoy life, feel content.
And that will become your key into Jannah (Paradise). And everyone is welcome to Islam.
_In order to get Eemaan_
1. You have to cease associating partners with Allah ﷻ in Lordship (Rububiyyah), like stop saying that nature or atoms and gravity regulates and creates the world. Because not even idolaters believe that their inanimate idols created anything. So how can you believe that the inamitate particles that the idol consists of is the creator and regulator? Therefore you don't want to be lower in polytheism than idolaters.
2. You need to stop associating equals and partners with Allah ﷻ in worship (Uluhiyyah), like stop invoking saints, asking forgiveness of men behind a curtain, or worshipping Jesus or Mary عليهما السلام. Meaning, not doing any acts of worship like prostrating, bowing, vowing, sacrificing, seeking, refuge with, swearing and taking an oath on with anyone other than Allah ﷻ.
3. Certainty of the Afterlife.
Not saying that you will turn to dust and vanish into non-existence. Because this ascribes shortcomings like injustice, indifference, creating the world with falsehood, not revealing the truth etc to Allah ﷻ. His Perfect Attributes that His work (creation) around you necessitated for His Majesty, Exalts Him from having equals (i.e. it refutes polytheism), and Exalts His Majesty from shortcoming like creating or doing things with falsehood and injustice (i.e. it refutes that the world exists with falsehood and vain i.e. disbelief in the Afterlife and not revealing the truth - Wahy (Revelation)). Thus this world exists bil-Haqq (with the absolute truth), seriousness and justice i.e. the Day of Judgement for which there is no doubt about.
That is what you need in the heart.
Allah سبحانه وتعالى said,
وَمَا خَلَقْنَا السَّمَاءَ وَالْأَرْضَ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا بَاطِلًا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ ظَنُّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا ۚ فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنَ النَّارِ
And We created not the heaven and the earth and all that is between them with falsehood! _That is the consideration of those who disbelieve!_ Then woe to those who disbelieve from the Fire!
أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ كَالْمُفْسِدِينَ فِي الْأَرْضِ أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الْمُتَّقِينَ كَالْفُجَّارِ
Shall We treat those who believe and do righteous good deeds as those who spread mischief on the earth? Or shall We treat the Muttaqun (the pious - God-fearing) as the Fujjar (wicked criminal sinners)? [Sad 38:27-28]
أَمْ حَسِبَ الَّذِينَ اجْتَرَحُوا السَّيِّئَاتِ أَن نَّجْعَلَهُمْ كَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ سَوَاءً مَّحْيَاهُمْ وَمَمَاتُهُمْ ۚ سَاءَ مَا يَحْكُمُونَ
Or do those who earn evil deeds think that We shall hold them equal with those who believe and do righteous good deeds, in their present life and after their death? Worst is the judgement that they make.
وَخَلَقَ اللَّهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ بِالْحَقِّ وَلِتُجْزَىٰ كُلُّ نَفْسٍ بِمَا كَسَبَتْ وَهُمْ لَا يُظْلَمُونَ
And Allah has created the heavens and the earth _bil-Haqq (With Truth);_ in order that each Nafs (self, soul, person) may be recompensed for that which it has earned, and they will not be wronged. [Al-Jaathiyah 45:21-22]
@@Ibn_Abdulaziz what is a madthkali?
@@one23four68 When the groups called khawaarij who hate unjust tyrranic Muslim rulers began declaring rulers as disbelievers and sought to rebel against them appeared, then likewise a similar group called ikhwanis who had similar goals but instead took the path of incrementalism, infiltration, lurking and skulking by way of compromising the religion, pragmatism and nifaq (hypocrisy) appeared too.
The Madkhalis are Salafis with sound 'Aqidah who appeared as a result to combat those two groups. But what happened is that they became similar to mccarthyism.
Those familiar with american politics during the cold war, saw that mccarthyism began declaring everyone as a communist until it ruined peoples lives and careers. Madkhalism are Salafis that went into extreme similar to mccarthyism. Just like mccarthyism began hurling communism at everyone, then madkhalis began making Tabdee' (declaring a person an innovater) on everyone, like saying: a khaariji or ikhwani or qutbi, or suroori etc.
@@one23four68 Therefore, if anyone attacked the mccarthyists, it appeared that such a person was actually anti-america himself, when it could've just been that he was refuting the injustice and false accusations of the mccarthians. Likewise the madkhalis shield themselves with "anti-Salafism". Because Salafiyyah is proper Islam. And many fall into traps looking like khawaarij and jahmites when they engage with the madkhalis.
Look at Muhammad Hijab, he attacked the madkhalis just to end up appearing as an ash'ari. He attacks scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Albaani رحمهما الله, calls Al-Fawzaan حفظه الله "a pope of the Salafis", and recently belittled Kitaab At-Tawhid and the books of Shaykh Muhammad bin 'Abdul-Wahhab رحمه الله. That's what happens to those who engage with Madkhalis, they get frustrated and become unhinged and expose many things within themselves.
The sufis who are grave worshippers call everyone, even other sufis that criticize their charlatry, sihr (magic) etc as "wahhabis".
Only other Salafis can deal with madkhalis. I've not seen a single person outside the Salafi community defeat the madkhalis.
اللهم ارنا الحق حقا وارزقنا اتباعه وارنا الباطل باطلا وارزقنا اجتنابه..اللهم علمنا ما ينفعنا وانفعنا بما علمتنا اللهم امين
They say: “They Are Jaamis and They Are Madkhalis.” | Shaykh Sālih al-Fawzān czcams.com/video/GgH8ewpbyzM/video.html
jazakallahu khaira , barakallahu feekum . May Allah Guide us all Aameen
MashaAllah, I genuinely appreciate your work Ustadth Lipham, and I’m learning a lot from you about tawhid, may Allah reward you both in this life and the hereafter ☝🏻❤️🧊❤️👌🏻 Amin
Ameen
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
Ameen
@@TawheedPromoter ohhhhh the talmud of madkhalis... i remembered seeing the barbaharigate and kitab ut tauheed written by ibn abdul wahab video.
@@Nothingburger90 saying MAdkhali is the way of the CArijis... who oppose anyone not in their hizb physically, it's you who are using the talmud here by saying madkhali...
DH isn't Khawarij he never spoke against the prophet or Sahaba as the Khawarij you gave examples of. So you made a fallacy; it was a false comparison. I don't understand why you'd bring up these examples since DH has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Also, the Jews rebelled against the Seleucids and this only did them good for they were severely oppressed by the Grecians. People don't rebel for no reason. They do so because they are oppressed and they want to improve their conditions. Your claim that rebellion is always or most of the time futile is simply ahistorical.
Do you regard a ruler who bombs the crap out of a country populated by Muslims, and working together with the Zionists, as a kaafir? It looks like you don't just because that ruler claims to perform salah. Is that seriously the criteria we have to go by?
Your understanding of the principles of Ahlu sunna Wal-jamac is amazing may Allah keep you the right path.
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
You are absolutely wrong brother. This is the pure doctrine of Brother Muslims. It's pretty much obvious.
@@TawheedPromoter I advise you to check out the channel “Maktabah Al-Sahaba” which focuses exclusively on the words of the salaf regarding very important matters of aqeeda
@@twoplus7647 Jazak Allahu Khayr.but are you sure thats thr right number, would that be on the sunnah site?
@@TawheedPromoter you should recommend thalath usul and 4 principles of shirk by ibn Abdul Wahab...
a salat book of his or Albanis...
say thats beginning and then the next 4 books you mentioned as 2nd half grounding for beginners...
جزاك الله خيرا akhi
This video is really a great response.
Barak Allāh feek.
Alhamdullilah, how refreshing. May Allah preserve you and unite all Muslims upon the proper understanding.
May Allah bless you for this clarification and keep you on the straight path.
Which Muslim countries is impermanenting 99% of the shariah?? I want to know
Also forget 99%, even if a person knowing make istihalal or change just one law of Allah from one thousand this is still Kufr Akbr.
Did this guy pay attention at Madinah university? What did he study?
Although i dont agree with u fully as i think DH is a great asset to the ummah. However it takes great intellectual honesty and being principled to make a video like this. May Allah bless you
Appreciate your sincerity, May Allah bless you
Subhanallah...I always like your middle approach regarding these kind of topics...as our prophet pbuh said muslims are ummatan wasathan (people of the middle)
I have a question: isn't comepletely legislating by other than what Allah revealed kufr?
That's kufr without any doubt ... and not "kufr douna kufr".
And the fitna in the quran is : Shirk
so we re amoug alot in fitna even if it's not war.
Democracy, atheism, zandaqua, Tahakum to taghut, Ignorance of deen ... ect ect
This is Fitna.
Not necessarily, in all times. It can get tricky. I will refer you to an 11 hour podcast Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan has on this very topic of "Khurooj". He is FAR wiser than I. BarakAllahu Feek
saajid is absolutely wrong about daniel .. watch daniel's response to saajid. all doubts cleared alhamdulillaah
May Allah bless you and reward you.. for your efforts in educating the Muslim community...
اللهم أرنا الحق حقاًّ وارزقنا اتباعه، وأرنا الباطل باطلاً وارزقنا اجتنابه...بارك الله فيك أخي ساجد وجعلك ذخراً للإسلام والمسلمين.
When are you going to refute yourself ? That will be dope
What would you say about the children who lay dead in Yemen by the hands of the saudi rulers..
I had it in mind to talk about this topic after reading
الموسوعة الميسرة
Thank you brother Sajid
May Allah strengthen our eeman
Daniel has done work against liberals, but Islam is the middle path and he sadly has errored on the opposite extreme of imams to be fair!
View : *Daniel Haqiqatjou Refuted* - by Firqat Najiyah
view : *Sulayman Al Ulwan Refuted Strongly*
- by : Abu Shaybah Al Muhammadi
Al Ulwan : "If he judges by other then Allah's law even while saying Allah's law is better, he is a polytheist" - Refuted by Tafsir ibn Abbas Quran 5 :44 by Ibn Kathir!
Dan worked with Saifudin who calls to Al Ulwan, he should denounce and not work with him.
Excellent video, JazākAllāhu khairan
I was waiting for this clarification. Jazaka Allah khayran and may Allah bless you brother.
Ameen
May Allah reward you abundantly and maintain our hearts on the straight path and not make our hearts go astray for any worldly gain.
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
ameen
Very educational video, JazakumAllaahu khayran Saajid and Team.
May Allaah keeps us all on the Haqq and guide us always on His Straight Path.
Amin!
Masha Allah I love that you speak out, I love your channel. May Allah bless you.
Jazakallah Khair brother, very balanced approach.
Both really great brothers!!!
May Allah reward you for including educational content in these kind of videos
My goal is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, Colossians 2
Muslims, stop fighting and love each other!
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
Madkhalis are Salafis in 'Aqidah, it is their hizbiyyah towards Rabee' Al-Madkhali that turns them into a sect.
As for the khawaarij, then they have nothing to do with Salafis. Madkhalis should be encouraged to become moderate since they are associated with the word Salafiyyah and bring stains and hate towards the truth with their behaviour.
All of these groups should become obsolete, no more madkhalism, ikhwanism or khawaarijism. But starting fresh as brothers who love one another like the Muhajirun and Ansaar. Only allowing people of Tawhid and Sunnah amongst us. No grave worshippers, asharis or maturidis, or tablighis or deobandis etc. Those grave worshippers brought a reminder of Noah's عليه السلام flood to Pakistan.
Also banning anyone that brings his ignorant cultures into the religion or follow extreme taqleed that violates the Sunnah. We have to create a benchmark for Islam and madkhalis are Salafis that should be encouraged to cease hating believers that don't like Rabee' Al-Madkhali and assist the believers, find them and love them.
The way I see things , Mr Saajid has been completely misled by Brother Muslims. It is truly disappointing.
Baarakallahu feek. Very well explained .
Jazakallah khair brother.
I love you brother Saajid for sake of Allah :)
i have a lot of respect for you. may Allah be pleased and guide all of us
Walaa' with the rulers instead of with your fellow duaat. No matter how you spin it, that is inevitably what you've done.
Also - this video was meant to show the middle path between the khawarij & "madkhalis", but you pretty much only focused on side.. some questions for you:
1) Are you trying to imply that only those with Khawarij ideology make takfir on those who rule by man-made systems or dismantle the shariah?
2) Is excessive tabdee' and removing people from the fold of ahlus sunnah by the "madkhalis" not a major problem that needs addressing?
3) Are you claiming that none of our 'ulama or duaat of Ahlus sunnah publicly named, shamed or mocked the rulers? And did you distance yourself from them and stop sharing their other works due to it?
Explaining the Fundamentals of Belief - Al Lalakki’ p.320
Imam Bukhari said: “I met more than a thousand people of knowledge from Hijaz, Mecca, Medinah, Kufah, Basra, Wasit, Baghdad, Sham, Egypt…I haven’t seen any of them dispute these matters..”
and one of these matters was: “That we do not go against Muslim Rulers”
These miskeen have never read a book on aqeedah of our Salaf they have only heard about them from social media. So what is truth seems falsehood to them and vice versa
Jazakallah Sajid. I've got to correct some of my views after watching this.
Edit.
And also I'll be more mindful whom to follow on CZcams
True ahlus Sunnah side with the truth wherever it may be and whoever it may be with. May Allah guide you and keep you firm
I have been struggling with this topic for the last few days. These concepts were really unknown to me and didn’t know what was the correct position to take. This video makes it clear to me that either extreme are paths to the hellfire. We should follow the Quran and Sunnah. Thank you brother for sharing your thoughts with us. May Allah reward you and guide us all on the straight path.
Don't take his words about so called Madkhalis, there's no such thing, rather he's accusing Ahlu Alsunnah of being Morjeeaa
@@hosamnasre7397 I don't think you understood the point Brother Saajid made in this video.
Ustadh Abdurrahman Hassan did a really fantastic job of breaking down this issue bit by bit in the Hot Seat Podcast.
@hiOOxkr magkis There are literally no scholars who say this term ( madthkali) should be used to describe any one from the Muslims of our time. So what does that tell you?
There are literally no scholars of salafiyyah who have identified any Muslims of our times as part of a Madthkali group . No one from the ulemah has preceded with this terminology so therefore it is ignorant false speech plain and simple. It is a label without meaning and with no basis in truth. Sheik Rabee is a well respected known scholar of this era so put some respect on his name and leave off this terminology created and propagated by the ignorant ones.
Critizing is not revealing
As much as I like listening to both Saajid and Daniel, I don't see where Daniel encouraged any form of rebellion against any Muslim ruler. Yes he criticized the Saudi government for hosting Halloween parties since it's a devil worshiping pagan festival but there is a difference between harmless criticism and rebellion. What Daniel did was harmless criticism.
That is also what I do not understand from people who claim DH tends towards the khariji side. The biggest crime that he perhaps did was to label people as Madkhalis and bootlickers. Still, I don't see how merely that qualifies him to be a khawarij. Would love some clarification from people who disagree.
So true it's just a mud slinging . He no where spoke about takfir only the wrong action like Halloween etc
@@mohdsadiq.salafi Can you please share the video? Thanks in advance!
if you see any tweets or any post most of the comments are we should fight the Saudi government and took Meka and Medina
@@abdulazizredi3682 Has Daniel openly said anything like that? If so, where exactly did he say that?
Thank you my Brother in Islam. You speak so well. May Allah bless you, Yah Rab.
*"تركنا الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر حتى خرج علينا أهل المنكر ينهوننا عن المعروف ويقنعوننا بالمنكر !! "*
*"We left enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil until the people of evil came out against us, forbidding us from good and convincing us about evil!!"*
Who is this statement attributed to Dayur?! Barakallahu Feekum
@@somedude6334 To the Ummah,
Wa fiyk Baaraka Allahu
I just want to ask a simple thing. It is ok to rebel against rulers that are against Saudi government ? Then why did the so called scholars support Iraq, Afghanistan and even Yemen war. If inciting rebellion is haram then they should be called out as well. Second why does Saudi scholars criticise other Muslim rulers? Famous example is Egypt Muhammad morsi. Now that country is ruled by sisi fattah, no one says anything bad at all.
Proof please.
Learn Islam first
@@MohamedAli-ko8gc proof what? How old are you? During iraq war saudi allowed USA to use their ground for air strikes. There were major protest against it. Then the protesters were called kwarij. Only after Saddam's death and Iran's uprising in iraq, saudi started to lobby against the iraq war.
@@fahadhusain1985 learn what ? It is ok to incite rebellion against Muhammad morsi but now that sisi is in power why aren't the same scholars saying anything? Looks like double standard to me.
@@darkcloud9053 Saudi and arabs states in general are under zionist influence , they aren't free , Sadam was and that's the reason for the invasion of Iraq.
What's sad is that some muslims defend them thinking their leaders are free , they are just mere slaves of America.
Thank you brother. We ask Allah to guide us to the truth and what is best.
DH released his response recently. I hope both of you discuss about this topic
May Allah increase you in wisdom and give you easy life
I invite people here to study books of Salaf which refuted devaints sects
Like Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Sharh Sunnah by Imam Barbahari
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Mohammed At Tamimi
@@TawheedPromoter you should recommend thalath usul and 4 principles of shirk by ibn Abdul Wahab...
a salat book of his or Albanis...
say thats beginning and then the next 4 books you mentioned as 2nd half grounding...
Brother you made me open my eyes on so many thing, I once was going to the ashari path then with the guidence of Allah your videos helped me to go to the sunnah path (I live in a place where there are a lot of salafi immams but I don't listen to them regarding aqeida that often.
I once was saying that we don't have any islamic countries or islamic rulers despite hearing that exact hadith over and over
Please talk more about this this was so eye-opening
May Allah reward you brother.
*reward you with the best
Amin
@@nothajzl u r right, my bad, may Allah reward him with khayr!
@@HaliliArber amin
My brothers and sisters, read, learn from history and how ahlus sunnah deal with it and when we talk about a ruler..remember Hajaj bin Yusuf..
Thank you my brother Saajid. May Allah give us understanding..
Another one is fear Allah and His day of judgement.
We live in huge fitnah .. May Allah give us guidance and show us the right path
Video is on point and precise , JazakaAllahu khayr.
Wonderful mar shaa Allah brother may Allah accept from all of us beloved
Daniel is a great brother, but not infallible. May Allah almighty guide us all to the right path
He is upon the methodology of khawarij may Allah protect us form him
@@TawheedPromoter
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم :
…ومن قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال حتى يخرج مما قال
@@user-vs2ln6vg1r and the moment you realize it is for true beilevers not for munafiq and ignorants.....
@@apba2240 if your reply is supposed to mean anything then it shows that you’re closer to the manhaj of khawarij than anyone else
@@user-vs2ln6vg1r and your comment above is actually for you I guess .........I didn't say he is khwarijj ....but not a good muslim skeptic....as he shows....even after listening him ....spreading falsehood about other religion and demeaning islamic scholars .......you still approve of him
I say qayamah is near....
Alhamdulillah akhi saajid on this platform giving straight talking facts. If not this place would be a madhouse. People without knowledge spewing out words they don’t understand
بارك الله فيك اخي على قول كلمة الحق ونشر الاسلام على منهج السنة والجماعة بعيدا على التشدد والتفريط
Glad to see a response, we as muslims dont stick to any celebrity speakers, regardless if we considered them friends and allies, if they go against the quran and sunnah, we have to declare the truth and call out the falsehood, jazakallahu khair
So, you have to speak out against Daniel, who should not have spoken out against the Saudi rulers (who are not rulers over him) for allowing people to do shirk publicly in the streets?
Is that right? Sounds twisted to me...
@@fark69 Follow the sunnah, not your whims and desires.
@@fark69 “Whoever intends to advise one with authority on a matter, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909
@@abdulnoorhussam1226 I sense sarcasm in this, i hope im not wrong haha
@@TawheedPromoter and saudi dont have any authorities on people living OUTSIDE and not a citizen of saudi
All praise belongs to Allah for guiding us towards the straight path. It's too difficult to stay in the middle path as Allah mentions, for those who are able to, Alhamdulillah for that. I have been following you since your Madinah days. You only used to make small interviews, and it was interesting to watch nonetheless. I did not focus a lot based on your background being an American revert, was expecting you to change as soon as you return USA. That was bad prejudice on my part, and may Allah forgive me, specially after seeing that scholar from Madinah University who held a PhD there return to USA and join Yaqeen Institute. But am glad you didn't change your opinions and Manhaj. Indeed, Allah guides whom He wills. And I would like to tell you brother, I love you for the sake of Allah. May Allah make it easy for you to propagate the Manhaj of Ahl Sunnah Wal Jammah. May Allah guide you and me and all of us, Ameen. Jazakallah Khairan brother.
Been waiting for this
Both of you are right. You need to talk this out. Deleting all your videos and disassociating from Daniel was overkill.
saajid is wrong in this matter .. watch daniel's response to saajid. all doubts cleared alhamdulillaah
May Allah reward u brother
السلام عليكم
Brother Saajid
I just had some questions
If a President like Tunisian President who passed a law of making equality in inheritance between males and females, is he considered kafir (not excusing him of ignorance) or no
And if no, can you give an example of not ruling with the rule of Allah becomes kafir
Secondly, I heard before that doing takfir doesn’t mean that people can go and rebel at them. Like a heard a Syrian scholar who was against Syrian rebellion even though he did takfir to Bashar. Is this correct or no.
جزاك الله خير
جزاك الله خيرا وثبتك على الحق أخ ساجد
A very complicated topic for me. I need more understanding concerning those terms. Thank you for the lesson brother.
I would recommend books of Salaf like
Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Muhammad At Tamimi
Plz study those to learn more about aqeedah and manhaj of ahlu sunnah
@@youtubeowl9544 because he had a library behind him, he automatically became extremely knowledgeable? What benefit did rebellion in Syria breed? Sisters selling themselves in Europe to feed their families. The Kharijites, like Ali (RA) said, utilize the Qur'an and hadith to suit their skewed vision of the truth. The Kharijites and Shiites were grouped together by Ibn Taymiyyah (RH). One wonders whether these aren't just covert Shias trying to corrupt the muslim youth in order for them to take themselves to useless deaths. May Allah protect us from misguidance. Amin.
جزاك الله خيرا