How Fast Is a Polaris RZR Turbo S from 0-60 MPH?
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 11. 2018
- (www.TFLoffroad.com) How Fast Is a Polaris RZR Turbo S from 0-60 MPH?
( / tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck.
Check us out on:
Facebook: ( / tfltruck )
Twitter: ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Truck: ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car: ( / tflcar )
and classic cars as well at:
TFLClassics: ( / classicsunleashed ) - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Great video! You’ve outdone yourself again.
This thing looks like a blast! What a beast!!
Awesome vid, keep the Turbo S stuff rolling...
6.39 in 4wd sport mode on pavement. Ask me how I know...
How do you know?
Haha could not resist....
@@matthewharris3081 haha. Because I've done it on my street with an app on my phone.
I tried and gave up.....all my '18 Turbo did was spin.....even on pavement.... :-)
Lol, Andre and Nathan could have used that rider gear when they took a side by side in the snow in the Colorsdo Rockies. They absolutely froze their asses off. Even flew through deep puddles and got plastered, no facemask. Brutal that was.
Most of the reason for nose heavy jumping is the length of the take off ramp. the 4 seaters wheelbase is longer than the take off ramp. ideally you want the whole vehicle to be on the take off ramp slope before any wheels get into the air. this allows the suspension to equally load. And yes, rebound settings and throttle input have a factor too.
Should have used the 2 seat model.
Polaris only gave them the 4 seat
Good video, thanks!
Dude i work for a company thats the only Company in Africa that has this Machines. This thing rips on pavement we need to test it after assembles and this thing has sooooooo much Power
Smaller tires like 30s would prolly give it a better 0-60 time
Maybe the long wheelbase causes the jumping issue? On jumps that size, at that speed, it looks like the front end was already leveling out before the rear tires even left the ground. The only solution is more throttle! ;). Great video. I love the Turbo S but it's way too wide for my purposes.
The face of the jump needs to be equal or longer than the total length of the unit. Also, letting off the throttle when on the jump causes bucking too.
Man, was not expecting such a low time out of the 4 seat! That just tells you how much that turbo does over the 1k engine! Nice video though.
Low? That’s like a terrible economy car 0 to 60. I was expecting much better times
@@AmericanWithTheTruth it's on the dirt at high elevation. Run an economy car on the same thing and you would see a difference. Obviously have never even driven a sxs before I guess lol
The issue is the jumps at IMI. I have been out a few times with my Can am Maverick and those jumps are meant to throw your ass in the air
If you stay in the throttle off jumps, it won't buck forward as much
Yep. Throttle pushes the nose up. Brakes push it down.
No, that's the shock setting not just throttle control. If the rear shocks are softer it won't buck.
@@cherokeeredman2756 that's true too but yes you do use throttle and brakes to adjust the nose in a jump. It's not as effective on a SxS as a motorcycle but it still works.
I know you can’t get everything you want but the two seater would’ve bean ideal.
So is the XP Turbo 17 @ 168hp faster ?
Yes, slightly
Rzr are belt driven its bad too preload . Thats a good way too burn up that belt. But its borrowed so no problem lol
Mantain your clutch.. dont leave it wet or it will rust and youll have belt problems
Damn, this things not even street legal and has 20 more hp than my crosstrek 😂
I got the 2 seater but got a licensee plate on it
Somebody need to explain to them how the LIVE suspension works. It automatically stiffens when taking off and cornering.
And jumping, and also many other conditions as well
shouldve let off the brake couple times before launching and turned on the live suspension my turbo s 4 velocity makes 0-60 in 5.3 seconds with just a bov the rest stock on the street
Didn’t you just have a video going over the same stuff?
My buddies blow $200 belts on these and the Can-am’s left and right.
I will agree that CVT is not the most robust tranny to use, however i think they still are a good choice because you can really find a good spot to run the motor while running it hard. With a gear transmission, you will have to find the right gear and rpm to rum a section at. With a CVT, you basicly just look at your speed. RPM is usually constant. They also seem to be easier to crawl though rocks with. Maybe one day we will get better belts that can withstand anything we throw at them.
DUNEYXZ I’ve been running my belt for 500 miles now and no cracking or slipping. All about how well you break it in and how you drive it.
He needs to learn when to use low or high....
He can't drive. 4000 miles on my belt on my Turbo, no issues.
1:40 that's what she said
I guess I’m a little shocked I would think that a turbo charged vehicle with that much power could hit 0 to 60 in 3 to 4 seconds. 7-8 seconds is really awful if you think about it that’s like a slow economy car. Maybe you just need to get that turbo charged machine hitting 300 hp first.
That is one way of blowing up the Drive Belt...
Not really. I run my RS1 harder than this there all the time. No belt blows at all so far.
The problem comes when launching from a stand still, i work at a Polaris Dealer and it would seem my customers have a special talent when it comes to bruising belts lol
Thats probably cuz they launch em lime 10 times ina row or after a good run. Hot rubber only goes so far lol. If u give the belt a break every once in a while. It will last a while
168hp isn't really that much be put through one of those belts. Think of all the Turbo mountain sleds that wail on the belt all day long. Hell 168 isn't much more than the stock 800 class machines
Sel Ect i have had customers blow the belt while trying to get the brand new vehicle in the trailer lol
Theres to much Rebound on the rear suspension. that would be the ideal thing to back off a few clicks if possible but its likely it just has a factory setting thats tuned to having 600 pounds of American meat on board...what an amazing machine, it would be deadly if it had a real transmission
Doesn't have clickers. Has live valve shocks adjusted by switch in cab that is tuned by the millisecond of input by driver
He’s Canadian
I have noticed that you all fluff your videos to always make sure they are at least 10 minutes long even when there isn't that much info put out. There must be a reason for this and I just wonder what it is. That being said I still enjoy most of them.
11B30 CIB CZcams pays more money if people watch your video for at least 10 minutes.
@@carguyg35 Ok well then now I get it. But that sucks when it forces channels to extend videos past how long they need to be. I appreciate the insight.
From the last 20 videos that were put out, 7 of them were under 10 min. I see no fluff.
Xp 4 turbo is faster then the turbo s. Turbo s is heavier and then big 32s rob a lot of power
I know, I know this is great to watch, but the truth is, showing this action in commercials is what is 'helping' to keep our hospital's E.R.'s busy, isn't it?
Right now in our area , at least, the news media are all about ATV collisions and injuries to younger children,..and some adults too, who think they are children while riding ATV's.
Reg Sparkes One of the reason UTVs are preferred is because they have a rollcage and 5 point harness. ATVs are notorious for rolling over and falling on the rider. A roll in a UTV you might a bump or bruise, but no way will you have broken ribs, crushed lungs, broken vertebrae, broken hips, etc.
Aka, you’re barking up the wrong tree if safety is your concern. UTVs are actually pretty safe.
@@kenrodriguez9645 well, there are an awful lot of Doctors and Nurses who work in the E.R's of hospitals who will be able to prove to us, that that statement 'a little' inaccurate!
However, you will note too, I did NOT mention the UTV specifically, but maybe I should have.
Reg Sparkes Ok. Just understand that your public safety warning on ATVs was posted to a video specifically about a UTV, where no ATVs were present in this video, nor were they talked about, or implied.
I get your message, but I think it would be a better choice to address it to the offending party. It would be like trying to tell Vegans the health risks of eating meat... no one here is riding without a roll cage and 5 point harness, man. ATV injury rates are significant, UTV injury rates are minuscule. This is a UTV Video.
@@kenrodriguez9645 Oh now Ken, you're being picky here, aren't you? You know full well what I was saying,..the proof of THAT was in the fact that YOU replied!
You see, THIS is exactly what I was talking about,...well, it's an easy choice,...don't reply at all.
Just go ahead an enjoy this hobby like I do on my ATV and my UTV ,but use what is mistakenly called "common sense' when riding.
( to say 'common sense' would imply that everybody has it,.we all know that isn't true, don't we?)
That’s not a lot of hp. Some motorcycles have more. I want 300hp and would rather built my own with a Subaru sti motor.
Can-Am so much better.
My friend got one just like yours 19 polaris. I got a 19 can am turbo I did some simple donuts.and he said it's my turn I show you how to do it he flipped over just for doing a simple donuts. I have to say that's a piece of shit Polaris it took 4 people to lift the car over the 2 doors of passenger got damaged the roll cage got bent on the roof .he didn't even have 1 hour on tha crap🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Slow
Still slower then Sleds... I'll stick to my truck with 400 hp.
Your truck with 400hp still isn’t doing a 0-60 in 6.3 seconds most likely unless u have a small ass truck or a Ford Lightning
Omg tfl STOP QUOTING MARKETING CRAP.
Useable wheel travel is a marketing ploy they came up with to have a larger number than can am x3.
All useable wheel travel is, is ground clearance at maximum suspension extension. They made up a stat cause their numbers don’t look as good next to the XRS
Rzr turbo S has 19 inches front and 21 inches rear travel. The x3 xrs has 22 inches front and 24 inches out back.
Have some journalistic integrity and research what official sources are telling you, and not just parrot them.
Anyone can read a brochure, but people are actually coming to you for REAL information.
The ONLY way that a stock turbo s will have 25 inches of ACTUAL legitimate useable wheel travel (defined as suspension articulation measured at the wheel without binding or locking or otherwise inhibiting any other vehicular dynamic) is never. It would have to have a catastrophic suspension failure to articulate 25 inches.
I’m going to trademark Legitimate Useable Wheel Travel* now.
Not true. As an example, when going over whoops the wheels will keep in contact with the ground for the stated wheel travel. Maybe 13 inches down, 12 inches up. You can use that wheel travel in various circumstances. It's 2 ft 1 inch that the wheels will move to keep contact with the dirt. Not that complicated. Stop being a hater.
Robert Hull you clearly do not understand what is going on.
Your example is a true 25” of travel. Polaris made up a new term, which is essentially ground clearance at full droop. It is not a measure of suspension articulation.
There suspension only travels 19” front and 21” rear... and they make it seem like it’s 25”s when IT ISN’T. While can am actually does have 24” of travel at the rear.
You might be ok with continuous misleading advertisements with few correcting the record, but I’m not.
sxsblog.com/finally-a-72-wide-rzr-2018-rzr-turbo-s/
So sick of polaris. They're junk
Lead Head get a can am or Yamaha instead of this
Cool story
They really do have A LOT of problems!
Every vehicle manufacturer gets a bad recall here and there. Does not mean every single unit from then on from that manufacturer is going to be bad. Most of the issues on RZRs can also be found on Can Ams as well. And i am sure other SxS manufacturers have some of the same issues too.
Well since the competition can barely com peat with 15 year old models not sure what you think is good.
Turbo s is trash