Awesome breakdown comparison. As non biased and owning both in 2 seaters I can say if I had to go r seater hands down back to the turbo S. 2 seater wise x3 is more in line and many prefer low down position. My biggest thing that I miss on the s is 7 inch command system. It's a luxury as you pay thru nose for it, but it lines up with dynamix which you pay for also. 4 seater Turbo S all the way. No lie I always miss the S.
Not to be a hater and compare opinions to opinions, but when you look at real world comparisons the top 5 finishes at king of the hammers where can am x3's leaving polaris in the dust.on top of that the x3 took first at the dakar rally offroad race.
That's true, however the rigs at KOH and Dakar are no where near stock. Don't worry though, we'll have the follow-up video on why the X3 is better out in the next few weeks. -Joe
I originally had plans of buying the can am until the turbo S came out. I bought the turbo S 4. love everything about it. I have driving both machines Can-Am and Turbo s so glad that I got the turbo s. My opinion the only thing the Can-Am has better is the motor. If you want to build a race machine sure Can-Am. But all around machine turbo S. And it doesn’t take much to make a turbo s fast. And no matter which machine you have there will always be somebody faster.
I don’t have either and am by no means a UTV person (thought I would love to get one soon). But why does it always look like a RZR is ready to tip over when cornering hard and the X3 looks lowslung and planted. It makes me lean towards the X3 just beccause of that, nevermind the extra power and that I rented one last year and loved it!
I think seating position/sight lines of the RZR created it's weakness, a higher center of gravity making it more tippy in the corners. Seems as though the Dynamix suspension was a good add for Polaris to combat this. I am a tech guy, but the ride command doesn't really appeal to me. I am all about performance and simplicity when it comes to my off road vehicles. I have a highly built Can Am Maverick X3 RS Turbo R, I loved everything about it except the site lines, I'm 5'9" and couldn't see over the dunes I was cresting. I added the 1.5" risers to the seats and that helped a bunch. I mostly ride dunes with the Can Am, trails are for my Wildcat. I just love that the manufacturers are pushing each other to create higher performance rides. I'm not a fanboy of any brand, I buy what suits me.
I'm right there with you! Can-Am has been killing it over the past few years and now other manufacturers are stepping up! I'd love to have an X-3! -Joe
It's an interessting discussion, the opposites of true technicans and hobby pilots cant be different. For my own, the choice of sxs of a technican will win the race at the end.
Can I do the same jumps with the 4 seater MAVERICK X3 MAX X RS TURBO RR as I would be able to with the 2 seater? I’m only interested in can am because it’s 195hp
Don't forget about ease of maintenance. An oil change on an X3 will be a mess and will leave you cut and bruised while the same work on a Polaris is not even a 1 beer job.
I'm not a beer-drinking technican. I spent my time for maintance and service and would give a shit how many time waste for changing oil. You never changed the spark plugs of a BMW 750I with V12 engine. This wasted time kicks your beer drinking mind directly in to the Betty Ford-Clinic. Please notice my sens of cold freez'n humor.
In Jan I bought a new S4 Turbo, and everything you mentioned is pretty much why I choose the S4. I have nothing bad to say about the Can Am models. I also like the factory 32" tires and the extra ground clearance. Bought the 4 seater for the longer wheelbase knowing it would ride better in whoops, and plan on running some Baja trips with my adult son and the extra length would help with storing gear. The Dynamix system works great and I'm switching from Comfort and Sport all the time as our speed and terrain changes. I will say this...The 2 seat version of the Can Am looks AWESOME!...Thanks and I did hit the SUBSCRIBE button!
Turbo s is better at blowing belts and catching fire. I love the X3 seating position, comfy for a long day. Parts thing, canam has more parts available (oem) I will agree on overall length, i wish the X3 max was shorter
No way I just split my trans cases and installed a three stage gear reduction on a 19’xpt4 32’s from 29’s so much low end control it’s a 38% and still rev limit at 69-70mph. I prefer rock crawl and it’s fits and turns better in the right turns even on the four seat. The x3 IDK lol into the front ends. Rzr cage goes out to the front of the car instead of having large groups of plastic hang off. Idk they are awesome still. Rzr for me needs 1/2”-1” raise in the driver seat and an inch back. 6-1” but can still do 100mile rides and feel okay. The rzr feels more put together as they age and loosen up. Can frame is way stronger.
Mtn trails mostly for me so between the xp1000 and the DPS Mav Max which to choose? I’m short but was told the can am could have blocks installed to raise seat position
If it was me, I’d lean towards the Maverick. They’re great trail rigs. What it lacks in ride quality compared to Polaris, if makes up for in fit and finish and reliability. -Joe
I went back and forth between the X3 and Turbo S and once I purchased the Polaris I never looked back. I think your comments are spot on when it comes to driver position and lines, for my riding style they work great. Keep up the good work!
I ended up with the turbo s because of a bad back and for me the seating position over the X3 was better and all the other reasons you mentioned. I love it but when I see an X3 I still wonder what if............either way I don’t think you could go wrong with either machine.
I moved to St George from TX a year ago with the intent to ride off road. When the Turbo S came out I bought the 4 seater version also, for many of the reasons you list. Dynamix suspension was a big reason, as was the shorter length. But I use the GPS the most, I am not from here and that saves my bacon on every ride in the Southern UT area. We've put 3600 miles on ours in a year with zero problems. It's a great all around machine. I love what the 2020 Pro model brings to the table (except it's looks). Will be tempted to upgrade when they release an S model of that.
Greetz from far away, from germany. My fav 4-seater sounds Can Am Maverick X3 Max. More goodies and upgrades available, very good dealership here in germany. And for me it's very important, the Can Am available here in germany with a licensed title for driving onroad (...to the beach, into the city to work and so on). I respect the choice of any other peep out there to pick up his fav 4-seater for his own. But told to buy a Polaris first, the oilchange take time like drink a beer and the Can Am not while waste time on it (to change oil and waste time). Thats points of low rated brainheads. Maverick's won the Hammer and Paris-Dakar and many other races out there, that show of the quality of this "time waste oil changing"-Can Am🤦♂️! Over 85% of Polaris or Can Am user/driver never in need to handle his own sxs like a professionell out there but talking like a big named prof. racer.
So where does your Talon X4 Live Valve sit in all of this? I am a big fan for the Talon x4 but after watching your video I'm still on the fence, Honda or Talon. My riding once I get to AZ will be desert trails, my concern is CVT belt breaking when I'm out with the family which is my wife and from time to time our adult daughter when she is with us. I definitely want a 4 seat ride but I'm still torn. Keep sharing...
The biggest reasons why I went with the Talon are 1. Their reputation for reliability. 2. Seating position for rear passengers. 3. DCT over belt. Power was not a concern for me for a couple reasons. First, I intend to have my family with me on most rides. When my family is in the rig, I can't imagine a situation where I would NEED 195 hp. Second, I came from a 75 hp machine so 104 is an upgrade. I'm only 200 miles in and so far I LOVE the Talon. PS- If/When I get a 2 seater, I'll lean HEAVILY toward a Turbo. -Joe
We have the rzr xp 4 turbo and love it, I take my family with me all the time I carry a small set of tools and spare belt, the extra power I get its awesome even if I dont ride hard most of the time. Going on 100hrs with out any belt issues . I do wish my 2019 was a little more roomier the rzr 2020 has more room but I prefer the looks of mine.
when it comes to strength there is no comparison. The turbo S is stronger in every way. There is absolutely nothing on the Can-Am that is stronger. The only thing that can I am has going for them is the motor. When you really want to compare motors you are talking 3 cylinders versus 2. The horsepower difference is not that impressive considering They have an extra cylinder. Don’t get me wrong I’m not a hater against Can am. Just do you research people. Don’t just compare the horsepower difference. The turbo S it’s just an all-around better machine.
Just to clarify the power doesn't matter when you dont have the ground clearence, suspension travel, or center of gravity to use that power. I can garentee you in some nasty shit a poalris could go 15 mph faster than a can am because its suspension design just allows it to do so. The turbo s is like a race buggy, and the can am is like an offroad limo.
Love the new Deranged metal sign in your garage/video area! Looking great. Agree with your points all the way. The X3 Max has it’s fans and has some appeal, but it just doesn’t work for us. 👍😎
I think the turbo s ride command is for the rider who doesn't know how to set preload or adjust shocks. More for the guy who wants to get in and just go.
Lol can am 2seater is faster. Better, dosnt break, agile, cornering etc... Had polaris since 2016 and rzr are like Jeeps they break all the time, have two friends that broke twice and they drive very carefully, can am can be abused and still hold on.
I’ve sat in both. I’ve driven both. More leg room in the X3 for sure but if your not a big boy or 6’ and under, that’s irrelevant as both provide reasonable space. -Joe
Deranged Off-Road with all respect we have our own preferences and just don’t like the way your saying rzr is better that’s your own opinion but I guess you have a point on the seating but like me I’m 6’3 so it’s definitely a plus
Finallly ur even dumber because they have the same suspension but the thing is that canam feels better because you feel safer and feels like a car, rzr feels like a toy and to narrow my groups of friends flip more often than on my canam
James Zhou ur dumb me nigga I have more shit than you and than fuckin @Deranged Off-road, 3 side by side 6 quads and 2 DIRTBIKES stay quiet bitch ass, broke ass talking and don’t even have a quad or anything
Awesome breakdown comparison. As non biased and owning both in 2 seaters I can say if I had to go r seater hands down back to the turbo S. 2 seater wise x3 is more in line and many prefer low down position.
My biggest thing that I miss on the s is 7 inch command system. It's a luxury as you pay thru nose for it, but it lines up with dynamix which you pay for also.
4 seater Turbo S all the way.
No lie I always miss the S.
I realize I am kind of off topic but do anybody know of a good place to watch newly released tv shows online?
@Fox Everett Lately I have been using FlixZone. Just google for it =)
@Odin Franklin Yup, I have been watching on Flixzone for since march myself :)
@Odin Franklin thank you, I signed up and it seems to work =) Appreciate it!!
@Fox Everett no problem :)
Not to be a hater and compare opinions to opinions, but when you look at real world comparisons the top 5 finishes at king of the hammers where can am x3's leaving polaris in the dust.on top of that the x3 took first at the dakar rally offroad race.
That's true, however the rigs at KOH and Dakar are no where near stock. Don't worry though, we'll have the follow-up video on why the X3 is better out in the next few weeks. -Joe
Amen and well said. Greetz from germany
They are both great machines 🤷🏽♂️ just a matter of preference
I originally had plans of buying the can am until the turbo S came out. I bought the turbo S 4. love everything about it. I have driving both machines Can-Am and Turbo s so glad that I got the turbo s. My opinion the only thing the Can-Am has better is the motor. If you want to build a race machine sure Can-Am. But all around machine turbo S. And it doesn’t take much to make a turbo s fast. And no matter which machine you have there will always be somebody faster.
I don’t have either and am by no means a UTV person (thought I would love to get one soon). But why does it always look like a RZR is ready to tip over when cornering hard and the X3 looks lowslung and planted. It makes me lean towards the X3 just beccause of that, nevermind the extra power and that I rented one last year and loved it!
What did you go with rzr or can am ?
@@FOURFTP still have yet to buy one but rented a Can Am X3 Max X RS Turbo RR and had a blast. Will most likely purchase that model when the time comes
I think seating position/sight lines of the RZR created it's weakness, a higher center of gravity making it more tippy in the corners. Seems as though the Dynamix suspension was a good add for Polaris to combat this. I am a tech guy, but the ride command doesn't really appeal to me. I am all about performance and simplicity when it comes to my off road vehicles. I have a highly built Can Am Maverick X3 RS Turbo R, I loved everything about it except the site lines, I'm 5'9" and couldn't see over the dunes I was cresting. I added the 1.5" risers to the seats and that helped a bunch. I mostly ride dunes with the Can Am, trails are for my Wildcat. I just love that the manufacturers are pushing each other to create higher performance rides. I'm not a fanboy of any brand, I buy what suits me.
I'm right there with you! Can-Am has been killing it over the past few years and now other manufacturers are stepping up! I'd love to have an X-3! -Joe
It's an interessting discussion, the opposites of true technicans and hobby pilots cant be different.
For my own, the choice of sxs of a technican will win the race at the end.
Can I do the same jumps with the 4 seater MAVERICK X3 MAX X RS TURBO RR as I would be able to with the 2 seater? I’m only interested in can am because it’s 195hp
...next to the turbocharger. 😉
I agree with everything you said. The biggest reason is the seating position and the length of the X3...I buy the Turbo S if I needed a four seater.
Don't forget about ease of maintenance. An oil change on an X3 will be a mess and will leave you cut and bruised while the same work on a Polaris is not even a 1 beer job.
I'm not a beer-drinking technican. I spent my time for maintance and service and would give a shit how many time waste for changing oil.
You never changed the spark plugs of a BMW 750I with V12 engine.
This wasted time kicks your beer drinking mind directly in to the Betty Ford-Clinic.
Please notice my sens of cold freez'n humor.
In Jan I bought a new S4 Turbo, and everything you mentioned is pretty much why I choose the S4. I have nothing bad to say about the Can Am models. I also like the factory 32" tires and the extra ground clearance. Bought the 4 seater for the longer wheelbase knowing it would ride better in whoops, and plan on running some Baja trips with my adult son and the extra length would help with storing gear. The Dynamix system works great and I'm switching from Comfort and Sport all the time as our speed and terrain changes. I will say this...The 2 seat version of the Can Am looks AWESOME!...Thanks and I did hit the SUBSCRIBE button!
That's awesome! The Turbo S is a killer machine. It's hard to go wrong these days! -Joe
Turbo s is better at blowing belts and catching fire.
I love the X3 seating position, comfy for a long day.
Parts thing, canam has more parts available (oem)
I will agree on overall length, i wish the X3 max was shorter
It’s long because the back seat has tons of leg room compared to the razor
No way I just split my trans cases and installed a three stage gear reduction on a 19’xpt4 32’s from 29’s so much low end control it’s a 38% and still rev limit at 69-70mph. I prefer rock crawl and it’s fits and turns better in the right turns even on the four seat. The x3 IDK lol into the front ends. Rzr cage goes out to the front of the car instead of having large groups of plastic hang off. Idk they are awesome still. Rzr for me needs 1/2”-1” raise in the driver seat and an inch back. 6-1” but can still do 100mile rides and feel okay. The rzr feels more put together as they age and loosen up. Can frame is way stronger.
Mtn trails mostly for me so between the xp1000 and the DPS Mav Max which to choose? I’m short but was told the can am could have blocks installed to raise seat position
If it was me, I’d lean towards the Maverick. They’re great trail rigs. What it lacks in ride quality compared to Polaris, if makes up for in fit and finish and reliability. -Joe
What about maintenance between the two and durability I’m in Alaska looking to buy a four seater
can am is more reliable
@@ferdinanddeda7207 in what ways? Just wondering
I agree Can am more reliable, Polaris is always breaking down
Yeah right Can-Am is better razors are still catching on fire
Only after people do stupid mods .
RZR*
Stockers and don’t catch on fire until you do crazy modern stuff it’s bound to happen it can happen to any machine really
What about the second row leg room in Maverick Max vs Turbo
I went back and forth between the X3 and Turbo S and once I purchased the Polaris I never looked back. I think your comments are spot on when it comes to driver position and lines, for my riding style they work great. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for watching! The turbo S is an awesome rig! Congrats!
you tube is making harder to respond. love the comparison.
What did you end up going with
I’ve decided on a 2021 rzr turbo 4 s
Its all about build quality. Which is better in that respect?
I'd say they're pretty much about equal as far as build quality.
Can am beats Polaris, Polaris is like the old American cars and the Can am is like the Japanese cars
I ended up with the turbo s because of a bad back and for me the seating position over the X3 was better and all the other reasons you mentioned. I love it but when I see an X3 I still wonder what if............either way I don’t think you could go wrong with either machine.
How do the new smart shocks of the x3 compare in your opinion for 23.
Got a 4 seater for my family. Picked a Turbo S & never looked back.
What about the 2 seaters?
I moved to St George from TX a year ago with the intent to ride off road. When the Turbo S came out I bought the 4 seater version also, for many of the reasons you list. Dynamix suspension was a big reason, as was the shorter length. But I use the GPS the most, I am not from here and that saves my bacon on every ride in the Southern UT area. We've put 3600 miles on ours in a year with zero problems. It's a great all around machine. I love what the 2020 Pro model brings to the table (except it's looks). Will be tempted to upgrade when they release an S model of that.
Greetz from far away, from germany.
My fav 4-seater sounds Can Am Maverick X3 Max.
More goodies and upgrades available, very good dealership here in germany.
And for me it's very important, the Can Am available here in germany with a licensed title for driving onroad (...to the beach, into the city to work and so on).
I respect the choice of any other peep out there to pick up his fav 4-seater for his own.
But told to buy a Polaris first, the oilchange take time like drink a beer and the Can Am not while waste time on it (to change oil and waste time).
Thats points of low rated brainheads.
Maverick's won the Hammer and Paris-Dakar and many other races out there, that show of the quality of this "time waste oil changing"-Can Am🤦♂️!
Over 85% of Polaris or Can Am user/driver never in need to handle his own sxs like a professionell out there but talking like a big named prof. racer.
So where does your Talon X4 Live Valve sit in all of this? I am a big fan for the Talon x4 but after watching your video I'm still on the fence, Honda or Talon. My riding once I get to AZ will be desert trails, my concern is CVT belt breaking when I'm out with the family which is my wife and from time to time our adult daughter when she is with us. I definitely want a 4 seat ride but I'm still torn. Keep sharing...
The biggest reasons why I went with the Talon are 1. Their reputation for reliability. 2. Seating position for rear passengers. 3. DCT over belt. Power was not a concern for me for a couple reasons. First, I intend to have my family with me on most rides. When my family is in the rig, I can't imagine a situation where I would NEED 195 hp. Second, I came from a 75 hp machine so 104 is an upgrade. I'm only 200 miles in and so far I LOVE the Talon.
PS- If/When I get a 2 seater, I'll lean HEAVILY toward a Turbo. -Joe
We have the rzr xp 4 turbo and love it, I take my family with me all the time I carry a small set of tools and spare belt, the extra power I get its awesome even if I dont ride hard most of the time. Going on 100hrs with out any belt issues . I do wish my 2019 was a little more roomier the rzr 2020 has more room but I prefer the looks of mine.
@@DerangedOffRoad Thanks for your input, reliability is always a premium especially when riding with family. Thanks for sharing!
Love the Turbo s
Nice comparison, thanks!
I don’t think either is better there just different and everyone has a different opinion
when it comes to strength there is no comparison. The turbo S is stronger in every way. There is absolutely nothing on the Can-Am that is stronger. The only thing that can I am has going for them is the motor. When you really want to compare motors you are talking 3 cylinders versus 2. The horsepower difference is not that impressive considering They have an extra cylinder. Don’t get me wrong I’m not a hater against Can am. Just do you research people. Don’t just compare the horsepower difference. The turbo S it’s just an all-around better machine.
Just to clarify the power doesn't matter when you dont have the ground clearence, suspension travel, or center of gravity to use that power. I can garentee you in some nasty shit a poalris could go 15 mph faster than a can am because its suspension design just allows it to do so. The turbo s is like a race buggy, and the can am is like an offroad limo.
Is that why Polaris won King of Hammers last year? Oh wait.....Can Am went 1st, 2nd and 3rd
-Dave
Can am dimensions don't fit most toy haulers. I have a 22ft titan fun runner fits a 4 seater turbo s just fine.
Opening song?
It’s called “Say it” by Trent Thompson. Solid tune! -Joe
What is the best 2 seater ?
X3
Can am is way better plus it looks better and they are much faster I believe
Love the new Deranged metal sign in your garage/video area! Looking great. Agree with your points all the way. The X3 Max has it’s fans and has some appeal, but it just doesn’t work for us. 👍😎
I think the turbo s ride command is for the rider who doesn't know how to set preload or adjust shocks. More for the guy who wants to get in and just go.
My guy never made the video about why the x3 is better.
Because it’s not
@@Richard-gy1xu😂😂
Lol can am 2seater is faster. Better, dosnt break, agile, cornering etc... Had polaris since 2016 and rzr are like Jeeps they break all the time, have two friends that broke twice and they drive very carefully, can am can be abused and still hold on.
Thank you so much for the help, I was thinking about wich one I should get now I now I’m getting can am.
@@ha3049 did you end up getting the can am?
@@djjunior809 Unfortunately nope
It's not that much money to install fox iqs for your canam x3
My 2020 can am maverick xrs rr turbo raced my friends 2019 rzr his rzr has faster acceleration but my can am runs faster over all at 95 mph
Cap if that rzr has faster acceleration
I agree with polaris 1,000%
X3 all the way, first of all if your man and big you have more room on the x3, on the you just feel tight with no space
I’ve sat in both. I’ve driven both. More leg room in the X3 for sure but if your not a big boy or 6’ and under, that’s irrelevant as both provide reasonable space. -Joe
I agree x3 all the way
Deranged Off-Road with all respect we have our own preferences and just don’t like the way your saying rzr is better that’s your own opinion but I guess you have a point on the seating but like me I’m 6’3 so it’s definitely a plus
If you watched the whole video, we will be giving you 5 reasons why the X3 is better than the RZR soon. Both are fantastic rigs! -Joe
I’m 6’1 220 pounds and fit perfectly in my Polaris
Love my Turbo S!
That’s a good song.
Honestly can am is way better then Polaris .
Dirt bikes are better 👌🏽👌🏽😂
Dirt bikes are awesome!
Simple . If you want to go fast buy a can am .
Finallly ur even dumber because they have the same suspension but the thing is that canam feels better because you feel safer and feels like a car, rzr feels like a toy and to narrow my groups of friends flip more often than on my canam
More narrow? They are both 72 inches wide... Sounds like your buddies don’t know how to drive... - Joe
@@DerangedOffRoad I feel like he's one of them biased people😂
James Zhou if by biased you mean "special" than you're probably correct.
@@DerangedOffRoad I swear he thinks he knows better than a actual person who spends more time on them than him😂
James Zhou ur dumb me nigga I have more shit than you and than fuckin @Deranged Off-road, 3 side by side 6 quads and 2 DIRTBIKES stay quiet bitch ass, broke ass talking and don’t even have a quad or anything
X3 is better but turbo s is smoother
Only way an Polaris is better than an is X3 is if you like Pistols.
Cuz if you buy a Polaris you'll Pistol your money away on repairs 😆!!!!
Rzr is trash compared to can am
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hands down Polaris sucks !!!
Can am over complicates their machines lol