Thanks for the update. At 10k miles with the stock Continental ProContact RX T2 tires on my model Y I had 6/32 on all four. So that is pretty good numbers for the Hankook's. Perhaps I will give them a try. I live in snow country so that is good you think they work well in the snow.
I had them on my car for 3K miles. They are all 4 at 9/32 as-removed. I removed them because one got a chunk cut into it by some road debris or something, and the traction was all around just not that great vs my PSAS4's, especially in the rain. They didn't really change my efficiency, either.
Oh really? So like, are these worse in the wet braking / cornering than PSAS4? Because I don't care about thread wear that much, I care about handling and braking performance. I live in PNW so it rains quite a bit here. Also like, all these "reviewers" are mostly posting their personal experiences without real numbers, and there's no direct comparisons with other tires.
@@UnobtaniumsQuickReviews So the traction in the wet is not great, but the stopping distance from 60mph is 30 feet shorter than PSAS4? Normally if the traction is worse, the stopping distance is longer.
@@vaddimka I deleted my response because I got confused on my mobile app and thought we were comparing the CC2 to the PSAS4. No, the Ions were not good at much of anything.
Thanks for this video, the stock tires wear faster than this and was thinking of this tire to replace with.
Thanks for the update. At 10k miles with the stock Continental ProContact RX T2 tires on my model Y I had 6/32 on all four. So that is pretty good numbers for the Hankook's. Perhaps I will give them a try. I live in snow country so that is good you think they work well in the snow.
No problem. They have worked well for me in the snow. Some in the comments weren’t so happy with them in MN though.
They have a pattern in the grove that could affect your reading as well. Might want to check again on your lower reading tires
Thank You will re-check
I had them on my car for 3K miles. They are all 4 at 9/32 as-removed. I removed them because one got a chunk cut into it by some road debris or something, and the traction was all around just not that great vs my PSAS4's, especially in the rain. They didn't really change my efficiency, either.
Oh really? So like, are these worse in the wet braking / cornering than PSAS4? Because I don't care about thread wear that much, I care about handling and braking performance. I live in PNW so it rains quite a bit here.
Also like, all these "reviewers" are mostly posting their personal experiences without real numbers, and there's no direct comparisons with other tires.
@@UnobtaniumsQuickReviews So the traction in the wet is not great, but the stopping distance from 60mph is 30 feet shorter than PSAS4? Normally if the traction is worse, the stopping distance is longer.
@@vaddimka I deleted my response because I got confused on my mobile app and thought we were comparing the CC2 to the PSAS4. No, the Ions were not good at much of anything.
I'm pretty sure your tires would wear more evenly if rotated at least every 5000 miles.
It's been my experience that Tesla tires wear more on the inside due to the negative camber.
Ive seen that on many of my friends. This old 2016 has always been wearing evenly. Guess I got lucky or built on a Wednesday ;)