*Explicit* Sabaton History - Into the Fire Explained | Reaction

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 07. 2024
  • Hey guys, hope you enjoyed this reaction and thanks for watching it with me! If you have a video in mind for me to react to, leave it in the comments!!
    Original Video Link Below:
    • Into The Fire - The Vi...
    #SabatonHistory #IntoTheFire #Reaction
    00:00 Intro
    01:02 Reaction
    19:34 Final Thoughts
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 6

  • @cloudedreactions2578
    @cloudedreactions2578  Před 10 měsíci +6

    Sorry guys, still having issues with the audio (one side still not coming through). Patience would be appreciated!

    • @FemaleSniper86
      @FemaleSniper86 Před 10 měsíci

      That's why I listen to these through speakers xD Don't even notice it.
      Are you recording sound separate from video? Sometimes that messes up sound.

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 Před 10 měsíci

      Tried to post in main section, but YT deleted it...maybe it will stay here...
      Indy is not technically correct that the US only got involved in Vietnam in 1961...that is only when JFK first sent troops there. Ike had sent weapons and CIA/Military advisors there as early as January of 1955. So the US was really involved starting basically as soon as the French left.

  • @angiewegenerdjmetalamazon4468
    @angiewegenerdjmetalamazon4468 Před 10 měsíci +2

    I love your reactions! Would you consider doing a reaction to a song/video that the singer of Sabaton, Joakim, recorded with parody metal band Nanowar of Steel? It is about a different kind of "battle", that was very important to the Italians. It seems that Joakim had a lot of fun. :D

    • @cloudedreactions2578
      @cloudedreactions2578  Před 8 měsíci +1

      That's the second time I've heard to do a reaction to manowar... it's a sign! Putting it on my list, thank you for watching :D

  • @FemaleSniper86
    @FemaleSniper86 Před 10 měsíci +4

    You know, there's a lot critisism towards the Haber-Bosch (or well msotly against Haber I guess) for creating the gas in WW1, but I don't really see how that is much worse than Napalm to be honest. At least what created the murderous gas also created fertilizers, so it had a good cause aswell, even if it was twisted by the same person to be used as a chemical weapon too.
    But Napalm, what goos did that bring with it? Nothing. Like they said, it was a means to an end - well, an attempt to end it. But it only caused more damage than good, and in the end they didn't even win.
    We've seen it time and time again, if ever another world war breaks out and we are all pulled into service, please let me remain on European soil. I do not want to go to war into an jungle area. Korea, Vietnam, Kambodja, Japan..... Horrible conditions to fight in. Against an enemy that lives in this place and knows it like the back of their hands. No thanks.
    Let's hope the next World agenda is Peace. For once.