Watch and Learn how to CRUSH a LIAR for HIRE by the Government
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 07. 2024
- DUI defense attorney Larry Forman cross examines the state's "expert" witness about marijuana and alcohol and their effect on his client, destroying him in the process and leaving a wet spot where the worm once sat.
After the trial, the jurors referred to Mike Ward as "that Quack" when I spoke to them.
November 3, 2023
Madison County, KY
The Prosecutor's Direct Examination of Mike Ward: 0:00
The DUI Guy's Cross Examination of Mike Ward: 17:45
The Prosecutor's Re-Direct Examination of Mike Ward: 42:45
The DUI Guy's Re-Cross Examination of Mike Ward: 48:01
The Prosecutor's Re-Re-Direct Examination of Mike Ward: 48:46
The DUI Guy's Re-Re-Cross Examination of Mike Ward: 49:10
Judge Hears Arguments and Rules on The DUI Guy's Motion for a Directed Verdict: 52:10
Judge: Honorable Earl Ray Neal, Madison County District Court Division I
Defense attorney: Larry Forman, a.k.a. the DUI Guy
Prosecutors: Rodney Davis and Skylar Jewell
Arresting Officer: (Former) Officer Gerald Salyer, Richmond Police Department
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theduiguyplus
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: / theduiguyplus
Twitter: / theduiguyplus
Linkedin: / formanlarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney
What blew my mind was when the judge said in regards to the turn signal and careless driving, that he would have to side with the Commonwealth since there was no evidence to prove the the defendant was innocent. Since when did courts adopt the presumption of guilt unless proven innocent?
When they stack the law against the people.
specially when if there is any reasonable doubt to prove guilt in which the defense proved.
The courts have always sided with law enforcement unless there’s evidence proving innocence.
@@FlyingSquell But sometimes not even when they have video(their own or third party) proving a cop lied, or worse....
Since they have been getting away with treason and sedition for decades.....
A judge being on his phone like that while someone is having their future ruled on should be grounds for dismissal
He said during side bar that he's taking trial notes. I hope he's being honest. Itd be more tasteful to do it with pen and paper so there'd be no question
@@nowasiwassaying...1699Why, he could be drawing pictures of Batman. Technology and the way people use it evolve. If anything, our courts need to embrace more tech.
@@nowasiwassaying...1699Why not just check the tape or transcript?
Everything that's said is recorded and written down already for him. Lol
Well I saw a judge reading the news paper while a trial was going on. And anytime someone objects to a question he was right on top of it and ruled without even looking. So some judges can multi task.
No dash cam no violation no bodycam no violation. Officer mutes or shuts off body cam no violation, Officer is fired and charged with evidence tampering.
i agree, the argument will be police have been doing their job without video since before video was available, so their testimony alone should be sufficient, i disagree because video has been known to prove police testimony false on many occasions, funny there is no dash cam on the pullover or the "reason" for it.
100% agree with this. Not one bit needs to be changed, updated or discussed.
Just being arrested can FU your life. This why a town or city were this is happening does not have immunity along with the arresting officer.
Okay but what if the officer forgets to turn on his/her body cam and witnesses a murder. They arrest the suspect and didn't record it, according to you they should just let the suspect go? Wtf
@@theroachden6195the officer could have killed that person and blamed it on a citizen easily! A police officer shoots someone who is innocent and they lie and say it was someone else..
The judge spent more time on his phone than taking notice of what was happening in his court room
Lawyers and judges already decided who wins before they even go to the courtroom. They are literally in the same country clubs
Disgusting behavior by this judge!
He said during side bar that he's taking trial notes. I hope he's being honest. Itd be more tasteful to do it with pen and paper so there'd be no question
@@mocassin92 don't they writing pads and a computer for taking notes.
Cushy gig working for the government
His Honour was more interested in texting than taking notice of proceedings
Playing solitaire
That was very clearly seen😮 !
No need to call that sob honor
Is the judge playing candy crush or whatever. As he’s glued to the phone. 📱😂😂😂😂😂
Whatever it takes.. have to release that Libre Opresso; ya know
He's also been hittin that flask...lol.
@@christopherscott8853 Whiskey not Bravo 🤷 sttttiiilll cleaning.. hot headache, plus..
@@christopherscott8853 flask of water not ever clear geeeekk! 😊
@@trusailietazperlinski4717Take a joke, geek. Is that your name?....lol.
I served on a jury for a case involving an elderly man, around 75 years old, accused of DUI in San Diego. It's essential to note that this man was gay and living with HIV/AIDS. This detail is significant because he had a wound on the front side of his left leg near the knee. This wound was slow to heal and infected, causing instability. He was undergoing treatment with antibiotics and painkillers. The defense attorney presented a photo showing a significant wound, appropriately described as a "gaping hole" in his leg.
The incident occurred when he was taking his intoxicated and irresponsible boyfriend, who appeared to be around 40 years old, home at 4 AM. The boyfriend interfered with the driving, causing the car to roll out onto the main boulevard after failing to stop at a T-intersection. Thankfully, there was no traffic at that early hour on a Saturday morning.
However, a veteran San Diego police officer, accompanied by a trainee, witnessed the incident and pulled the elderly man over. When the elderly guy exited the car and stumbled due to his leg problem, the officer asked if he was using drugs. Unfortunately, the man admitted to taking a painkiller just before leaving home. Consequently, he was arrested for DUI and taken into custody for a medical assessment.
The medical assessment, conducted approximately 55 minutes after the man took the painkiller, showed the drug was in full effect. Despite the time lapse, the officer proceeded with the arrest based on the drug-level printout. Surprisingly, neither the defense attorney, the judge, the two officers, nor the other jury members considered the time lapse factor during the trial.
During deliberations, I had to use a whiteboard to illustrate (had to draw them a picture, for fk's sake) that the man was not impaired at the time of the traffic incident, based on his (uncontested) testimony. After thorough discussion, we, the jury. unanimously agreed that the man was not guilty of DUI.
I was mildly surprised when both the District Attorney and the defense attorney requested interview of the jury members to understand our verdict. It was alarming (and damned disappointing) to me that no one had considered the time lapse factor, and I felt surrounded by incompetence. This oversight could have unjustly led to the man's incarceration and significant financial losses.
Most infuriating was the lack of intelligence displayed by the arresting officer in neglecting to consider the time lapse. I asked if the idiot officer was available, but he was not. Just as well because I would have criticized his negligent actions and carelessness to his face.
In conclusion, I just gotta express my gratitude to Larry (and defense attorneys like him) for his moral and conscientious work. My singular experience in the court system has underscored the profound importance of such advocacy in ensuring justice for the victims of jackass kkkops.
A Complaint with a Copy of this Video NEEDS to be given to Judicial Commissioner For Review and Discipline!! Outrageous
He said during side bar that he's taking trial notes. I hope he's being honest. Itd be more tasteful to do it with pen and paper so there'd be no question
If I was being examined by the DUI Guy, I would try to give yes or no answers, and if further elaboration was needed I would try to minimize any response. The DUI Guy always catches witnesses using their own words! Brilliant.
Do go usin' my own words against me...
I think you mean he gets to the truth and your saying you would minimise that????????
He is extremely smart in what he specializes in which is DUI cases he actually went to the police academy and took their DUI training and knows more about what they teach the cops than the cops do lol
Im beginning to believe that all judges should have surveillance behind them after the Oklahoma judge and this one on the phone so much.
Judge. No one can serve two masters. Get off your phone and do your job, which means listen to the case properly and stop using your phone. This should cause a mistrial
I agree , it seems like a joke
Ridiculous how a cops “ training “ can paint someone as impaired when it’s not blatantly obvious !!! Let’s get drinks off the road , not just anyone we can fish 🐠 from a stop !!
I would have entered that fact into evidence. "Let the record show that the judge is on his phone and not paying attention to the case." I guarantee tat would get his attention.
He's probably watching kid porn.
He said during side bar that he's taking trial notes. I hope he's being honest. Itd be more tasteful to do it with pen and paper so there'd be no question
This “Toxicologist” is stuck in the era of “REEFER MADNESS”
This liar has prob never smoked a joint before yet knows how it affects everyone. I know people that when they smoke they are much more alert and attentive than when they haven’t smoked, I also know people that are the opposite. It differs from person to person and you can’t throw a blanket over it.
right but either way you've never heard any of them with slurred speech from just weed have you?
Judges wife texting him with her grocery list and told him don't be late or he will be on trial😂
...I'm in the 1st 12-minutes & listening to this *_Clown_* "testify" is mind-blowing...
...Me personally, i'm immune to the effects of THC, so I don't smoke...
...but even if you listen to a couple of potheads with personal, first-hand knowledge on the subject...
...they will tell you that there are _TWO_ different strains that act differently(X).
...[As-in, (if I understand correctly) that (there are two major parent strains from which all the different varieties derive from ?)]
...This "witness" is an absolute *_Clown_* as he's testifying to knowledge outside the scope of his discipline...
...A more suitable witness for this particular subject matter would be (1) a Researcher who specifically studies the effects of it on individuals...
...or (2) a Pothead with years of personal, first-hand knowledge & experience of the effects on different people.
That's what I'm saying, I'm an expert in marijuana, way more than this guy, I got tens of thousands of hours running equipment boxing working in the oilfield, with THC in my system. No incidents n actually one of the guys you call when you want shit done right
@@garywhite3209 ...The guy literally wrote a paper suggesting that LSD, a drug with literally NO Lethal Dose, just somehow magically was the "cause" of Death !!! ...At first, I thought he was just a *_Clown,_* but when I heard that... I knew he was a complete *_Quack_* !!!
14:33 _that moment when it occurs to the judge that his thrilling round of Candy Crush Saga might be noticeable to others_
"Taking trial notes" looks a lot like surfing the internet.
Got to love watching the Judge texting during the triall and you wonder if he's really paying any attention to what really going on in his court room, Sad to see!
Wouldn't be the first time an "expert witness" was used to convict someone on bogus evidence. Experts shouldn't be taken at their word just because they're experts.
Experts are mostly paid liars nothing more!
when this "expert" reads the part he said was left out states "a lack of evidence does not prevent the successful prosecution of a marijuana user" he thought that statement would help him but if i caught that someone else had to
Larry HAD to have won this. I want a finale❗Sorry if I missed it, but, damn. To watch him make his case is an awesome thing ❤ He doesn't even have to be rude. Just presenting evidence. I think prosecutors are scared of him anywhere.
This guy testifies to how anebriated one is with a .069 BAC yet the legal limit is .08. Make that make sense.
Why the defense is able to prove the defendant did not break any laws and destroy that statement with facts of the case
It's Kentucky nothing makes sense here when it comes to the law
Magic marihuana math
@@Stingray-jo2lv ...Nothing makes sense... We are all living in *_Upside-Down-World_* !!!
That must be why they're talking about the devils weed
You are the “pit bull” lawyer I would want if I ever got in trouble. Amazing job!
Someone should give the judge a drug test.
Happy to see the judge uses this time to catch up with his phone quite the multitasker
After seeing the way cops and prosecutors and “expert witnesses” lie, I could probably never convict anyone unless there is direct video evidence of them committing the crime.
Unfortunately, they can now fake videos... (if they really, really wanted to convict someone)...
...Or, the more likely scenario... if they really, really wanted to convince & propagandize something to the masses.
Well realistically the phrase is guilty before proven innocent without ANY reasonable doubts. Now that's pretty hard to reach if it is treated as intended. Just don't say that if you get called for jury duty, act like a normal person who wants to uphold the law and be honest for society. Obviously there's nothing wrong with judging it the way you do, without camera evidence it is fair to have reasonable doubt based on cop/investigator claims. Especially because their whole job is biased to make the person guilty. Kind of a stupid system IMO. But just say that you will uphold the truth and hold everyone at the standards you are supposed to. They don't have to know what that means for you or they will kick you out. But it is morally and objectively correct to have doubt on just testimony based on how often we see cops lie and their inherent bias to want a conviction. That is a reasonable doubt for any normal person, only a fucking idiot would trust testimony of cops and investigators with out any single doubt. If anything I have a LOT of doubt and their words mean nothing. But I won't be explaining that when called for jury duty, I will just say I will uphold the laws to the best of my ability with the information presented.
There was a case out of *_Florida_* ("The Ice-cream Truck Killer") where the Lead Investigator got on the witness stand and could barely speak English: He came across as literally R3T4RDed & botched the investigation at several stages, one of which was to obtain key exculpatory evidence that would have 100% definitively proven either Guilt or Innocence (the Verizon ISP location & data records), and despite this, the jury still convicted the defendant !!!
If they don’t have evidence, they pretend to know the “intent” of a person.
@@nikolaikalashnikov4253disgusting and truly frightening. People are just sh*t.
His videos are getting better and better. A wealth of knowledge.
Is that the ghost of young Abraham Lincoln sitting next to the judge?
Hilarious!
The judge alternates between texting, eating candy or cough drops, coughing, and surfing the web. This guy is a disgrace and hopefully is not re-elected.
Dude, the Judge said he's taking trial notes on his phone during a sidebar.
I would call for a mistrial since the judge is not paying attention. Good grief.
This toxicologist has never studied or experienced THC. As soon as he called thc a cns depressant, he proved his lack of knowledge.
How so?
Cns depressants suppress the nervous system, marijuana is considered a hallucinogenic I believe but certainly doesn't depress the central nervous system, i believe it actually works in a very unique way compared to say opiates alcohol and benzos are all cns depressants and all are much more similar to each other than they are to marijuana. Marijuana stimulates more than depresses.
Every judge across the country should unequivocally and explicitly state at the beginning of every trial that LYING will be punished with IMMEDIATE imprisonment.
Human error and lack of memory prevent that reality
The Judge sure has no problem texting and playing on his phone!
"The Effects of Cannabis and Alcohol on Driving Performance and Driving Behavior", Simmons et al 2022, a meta-review of 57 studies, looked at among other things the effects of alcohol and THC on "hazard response time" and cannabis was not associated with an increase in hazard response time but alcohol was. The combination of both did not increase hazard response time over what alcohol did alone. The expert claims that THC at the very least has an additive effect when combined with alcohol on reaction time. I would like to see what study he is referencing to conclude that.
I don't know what Planet or Universe you're living in... But here in *_Upside-Down World,_* alls you have to do is declare the "witness" an "Expert", then he magically just gets to say whatever OPINION(s) he wants. But yes, you are correct... If we were living in a Normal Universe, actual witnesses would be required to actually have personal, first-hand knowledge and would be held to only testify to actual FACTS currently within their knowledge. This "witness" here is an absolute *_Clown_* as he's testifying to things completely outside the scope of his discipline & domain of *_Chemistry & Toxicology._* ...And if someone thinks I'm mistaken here, then to demonstrate, alls you would need to do to destroy this *_Clown_* would be to draw a random chemical structure, and ask him to 1st identify it and 2nd, explain its toxilogical effects on the human body. The only person who should be allowed to testify on the "effects of THC" should be an actual Researcher in THC, or, an actual Pothead with years of personal, first-hand knowledge & experience.
It would have compounding effects depending on one's own tolerance for either.. that would be my lifes observational study...
That may be true, but without your observations being controlled and peer reviewed they are just anecdotal. An expert shouldn't render an opinion on anecdotal evidence, at least not without stating so. Besides, he specifically used reaction time as the thing being affected, but a recent meta-analysis refutes that claim. If he had picked lane control instead of reaction time, I would have agreed with him. There are several studies showing how THC exacerbates weaving in one's lane when combined with alcohol.
@@markburry9989 that was the word I was looking for....remember when "masks" were proved "scientifically" because a couple hair dressers clients didn't get sick because hair dressers wore masks...
It was hilarious because few if any scientists would accept anecdotal evidence on its face
@@markburry9989 my general point has to do with tolerance...it's obvious that without tolerance for either one shouldn't drive...however the world is full of bars people with tolerance drive home from every night safely
The DUI guy found a liar.
Capitalism, it's great isn't it lol... they can use our taxes to pay some guy to make stuff up to convict us
Abe Lincoln is the law clerk ?
Them kids behind the judge sure are studious
😂Defense should have asked "do you use the same bibliographies when you testify for the Defense?" Should be able to disqualify him from there no matter the answer.
19:45 a Judge who plays with his phone, instead of listening.....
Oh yea I’m loving your videos… you’re not just telling us the best route or how to but actually giving us the questions!
Yeah he's definitely playing Golf Clash... what a champion!
...But did he have to constantly _COUGH_ into the *_mic_* while the "witness" was "testifying" ???
And that is why roadside tests are not recommended.... There is nothing that it could add to this mans defense and gives officer chance to make objective statements at trial.
that the judge hoarks his loogies into his kerchief repeatedly, then uses it to cough into....repeatedly...then wipes his face with it IS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.
plus his constant texting and internet usage instead of using his observation skills to determine whether or not the witness is being truthful is reprehensible.
this "judge" is revolting on a hygiene (personal) level and on a judicial (due process) level.
Courts ruled that law enforcement officers can lie to citizens and in fact receive tmrvaining on doing that, so how then can the courts find any basis to believe any law enforcement officer? It boggles the mind that courts could belive them
That needs to be included in every case involving police.
Cops only tell true lies.
DO NOT EVER FORGET IT!!
Just to get em off my personal back about it.. I needed a court proceeding.
The judge seemed more interested in his text messages than the trial / hearing
I'm glad everything is going so well that the Judge can stop paying attention to the court and send some texts.
I wouldn't want an "expert witness" who gives off the creep vibe testifying on my side...
Context, please… Why the hell is that judge on the phone the entire time?
This is in reference to the female behind the judge, but first a side-note: maybe its cuz i missed the other vids so far in this series, but I struggled to come up with what her job could possibly be... until i decided its just bring ur daughter to work day (omg, which is so like, totes adorbs, btw!). Did anyone else notice that you can pinpoint the exact moment she openly sides with the prosecution in this video!? As the prosecutor presents his argument against the motion for a directed verdict (beginning at 1:00:38 for those who want a contextual refresher) then concludes his asinine argument by basically saying the defendant must be found guilty, she blatantly nods her obvious agreement (at just a sec or 2 after 1:01:41)! It would terrify me to be a part of the defense and see any member of the court/judicial staff decide the defendant's guilt at any time AND share that opionion openly during a live court session (edit - even without the jury present), particularly when they are sworn into the position under an oath to always presume innocence all the way up to the reading of the verdict (or at the least not openly share that opinion/decision, as it potentially could affect the decision reached by others).
At the least, this sort of thing could lead to a mistrial! For example, if she is the Judge's secretary and, while bringing his lunch or something, she convinces the Judge of guilt, which may cause him to make biased objection rulings or something similar. At worst, if this happened n no mistrial was granted, people could receive convictions based on the opinion of one person with little-to-no legal training, solely due to their access to a person in a position of great power who likely relies on and confides in them daily, while also listening to and respecting the opinion of the coworker in order to succeed at work daily... ugh
As I'm sure u can tell i was absolutely appalled by her decision to announce that she took a definite side! Maybe its totally fine n I'm making mental leaps that are nonsensical. Maybe its not as big a deal as I think; either way, i think the Judge should just leave his daughter at home from now on (at least so we dont have to stare at somebody who looks like they have fillings n chew tinfoil all day)...
LOL, last thing i swear!. I just had the thought that maybe shes not his daughter n instead her job is to straight grill / mean-mug anyone who gets outta order (tho she seems to have forgotten that this punishment should only be doled out in response to some offense committed, and now she just gives dirty looks to everyone, pretty much the whole time, free of charge). Notice how she constantly resting-bitch-face's the whole room? Maybe this Judge's posse/entourage/back-up dancers started out as part of a good cop (i.e. Sheldon/Bill Nye's love-child on the left) / bad cop [i.e. "Glaria," (yes, I gifted her that name using a combo of the word glare + Gloria) aka Aunt Flo being entirely denied any n all chocolate AND Midol] team, OR maybe shes part of one of those shoulder-perched angel/devil situations that the Judge has going on;
We may never know...
Thank you for showing this.
Tell me you’ve never smoked marijuana, without telling me you’ve never smoked marijuana.
I didn't inhale. Lol
@@jeffwinburn1283 ha ha
am i wrong in saying the judge is wrong because he won't allow him to state "legal limit" to the jury when the level .08 is in the law called the legal limit
WOW. That "judge" texting while someone is testifying...or at anytime during court, is HORRIBLE. HE'S NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT'S BEING SAID. Anyone else doing that same thing, would be called OUT on it BIG-TIME.
And why would he be reading the highway and safety documents when he is a toxicologist. Those reports have nothing to do with toxicology .. They have to do with officers observation..
Honest Abe Great Granson sitting there behind the judge with the Bowtie.
🤣
This paid expert is obviously not used to being challenged, he has met his match.
A Fine post. Clear, good volume great view angles. Lastly, superior litigator. Persevere..
Oh yeah, the guy is a fraud.
Is the Judge playing Golf Clash?
Well done!
The judge is playing Tetris on his phone.
Remember, if a pharmacistical company can be sued the DEAs operation of internal medical devices to keep a person from overdosing, and regulated with in legal established limits for that person should be able to sue in the event that a person is being obstructed by the medication management administration, and the personnel overseeing the insurance of that medications administration of the said medication.
...What ? ...What are you talking about ? ...Can you elaborate ?
Where does the state get the money for an expert? It's a frigging misdemeanor. Is this a death or serious injury case?
Vast Quantities. Excellent.
Like the video Larry but wish you could have enhanced the volume but understand that you probably couldn't.
Great job dude 😎
i have one question about the turn signal and the dangerous? and any court proceedings at all. isn't a person presumed innocent till proven guilty? with that said it wasn't up to the defendant to prove himself innocent it was up to the crown to prove quilt in which they failed to, so why would the judge refer to the defendant as not proving his innocence?
Is Canada,,,,,,have to prove innocents ,,,,not America 😮
Some answers are obvious...Once charged, good luck. Guilty or "Not" Guilty either way innocence isn't considered...."Not" Guilty is them absolving the defend-ant
Why do you think lawyers do so many "Sovereign citizen fail videos" -- its gaslighting, because those average Citizens asked the same question and started fighting back. What's the best way for your enemies (The BAR/legal system) to subverts the People's Right's rights? With sabotage and sedition upon those people using the media and creating their own language (legalese)?
Something to chew on anyway... I love the Republic, and it's every American Citizen's duty to protect it from invaders, foreign and domestic.
Yeah not just prove guilt but prove guilt (in a traffic infraction) "by a preponderance of the evidence" (Beyond reasonable doubt is for criminal charges)...The prosecution presented a cop's unsubstantiated statementsas it's sole evidence,
Doesn't sound particularly 'preponderant' to me, it is classic "he said, she said"
And learning how judge Neal works!
I had conversations with a psychiatrist and therapist ...separate times, asking directly how they prepare reports LE & DA's request from them... Both clearly said they know how to tailor what they say & write, to satisfy those paying for the reports. Otherwise they would not be sought out and they would work no longer..
Your a hell of an attorney young man
Most people are screw once there case goes to trial. You get as much justice as you can afford.
Now as they thought he was making me suffer the effects of driving below the legal limit, but still under the effects of alcohol beverages from months prior after dinner..
Remotely he administered the medication I did not need back into my blood stream..
I began to show falling eye lids, the trucks systems started alarming continuously..
My texts messages when stopped were no longer understandable. Following directions had to become the passengers obligation. The wind which actually was not that bad though it was in the high mountain ranges, and ice was even more than I could handle on flat non icey highways.
THAT'S WHY!
Medical negligences, malpractice, ect. . .
Bro what
@@TheKyleCostello im thinking the same. i guess drugs affect everyone differently
When the judge said ‘Siri’, Siri on my ipad activated 😂😂😂
Funny at end you had the judges sides be enraptured with your motion
Professional liar for the government
If no cell phones are allowed in the court for use, then why is the judge on his cell phone? That is ridiculous! You cannot even pay attention when a person life is on the line?
Why is this judge texting a lot of the time. His mic is picking it up
Wow. This judge is so bored that he spends all his time on his phone.
The cross dresser in the black robe would lose his shit if anybody else had their phone out, let alone texting.
The Hon. Earle-Ray Neal must self manage his State Funded IRA.
Love the worm thumbnail lol
The judge isn’t even paying attention. 😊
Is the attorney in this video with the salt n pepper hair the DUI Guy?
I'm not sure if this is genuine and I've missed a joke lol but aaanyway yeah, he comes up at like 18 mins with the big folder 😊
Salt and Pepper hair, and light blue suit. Two men at his desk.
@@plainmaryjane thank you, no I was serious... this was my first time on channel, his approach to the witness was perfect, extremely well done.
😂 why the fug is that judge so focused on his phone
I smoke about one blunt a day and weed stays in my system for at least 20 days.
I know, because even the cheap home tests picks it up that long.
I cant imagine a lab couldn't pick it up.
"If you're going to be my bench clerk, you're going to need to wear bowties."
What is the judge doing on his phone?
Why is this Judge playing with his phone during this trial? Isn't it his JOB to pay attention to what is being said in his courtroom?
What’s hilarious is how truly clueless any of these people are to cannabis and the effects it has on people. It varies drastically. I wake up and smoke, smoke all day, and go to sleep after smoking. I am very successful, intelligent, articulate, focused, driven, etc. The ignorance is truly too much to anyone with an active brain who cares to actually experience life and natural substances that can be of benefit.
So the expert does no testing at all he uses other testing results and just formulating an opinion favoring the customers..lol. He probably doesn’t even know the effects of the drugs he tests .. because his tests results are based on cadaver specimens..
what till ChatGPT gets it chance to baffle with bull shit. lol
I'm here now
How is a judge allowed to be on his phone?
Hes a government employee without a boss
But if you have a problem with the inner ear that has been caused by high blood pressure for long time to cause tinetus
The "Expert" stated that imbibing THC produces "intoxication," otherwise people would not smoke it. But he knows nothing about marijuana consumption.
How many inhalations of marijuana are needed, Doctor, to produce intoxication to the point where someone should not drive?
Were these deep inhalations to which you refer, Doctor?
What if the individual's lungs hand been affected by a life-long cigarette habit?
Would that affect the individual's lungs, Doctor?
Might that affect the ability of the lungs to transfer THC into the individual?
Aren't these variables about this individual that affect the applicability of your analysis to this individual?
I've only seen one other supposed expert destroyed like this, and that was the hack forensic Orthodontist from Hattiesburg, MS.
Right. He's not a doctor. He just has degrees, not anything past a Master's. Not that it's bad, but like you said, how can this dude know how pot in his system from whenever + recent .06 BAC, makes this specific defendant be impaired? And the same on that why else would ppl ingest THC, except to get high? Just wow. I guess I've been taking Valium or Klonopin for 20 years now so it'll make me high...no, it doesn't do isht to me. It definitely doesn't make me high, relaxed or not have anxiety! I wish. I take it to raise my seizure threshold & not have to worry about status epilepticus again. This chemistry teacher is just that...he knows about chemistry but I really don't get how he's some great forensic toxicologist. Imo, he's not qualified from the jump.
im a little late to this party but if I ever catch a case in Kentucky, i hope he is my judge..I also scroll on my phone instead of paying attention to important things 😂
How much is this all this costing, to double down on one poor guy with a load of dodgy evidence for a DUI, he’s not run anyone down, crashed his vehicle etc!!
It looks like 3 pretty experienced lawyers for the state and we're talking misdemeanor with no jail time, usually the new grads handle the misdemeanors. Plus $ for an expert who said basically nothing?
Abraham Lincoln appears to be sitting to the left of the Judge
WTH, is that judge doing. FOCUS
The Judge has his thumps going pretty fast. Is he getting a golf lesson maybe.
Never trust anyone with a hyphen in their name.
This dirty judge wants to punish this man no matter what is proven or disproven. Very bad judge!!!
The judge using his phone non stop, then surfing the web from his computer really seems like judicial misconduct!
The gentleman behind the judge looks a lot like a young Abe Lincoln.
Wow you should be arrested for how you shattered the whole case right before the courts eyes even the judge knew I believe within the 1st 5 minutes this case was over love your work!
It would be nice if the judge could get off his phone.