Perfect Win in Traffic Court for Defense Running Stop Sign Judge Dismisses Case for Lack of Evidence
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2021
- "Copyright © The Law Chronicles, 2021. All Rights Reserved."
No part of this video or the information contained therein may be reproduced, modified, or distributed without the written consent of the representative(s) of The Law Chronicles.
NONE OF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES, ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS, AND AGENTS (ALL COLLECTIVELY HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS “THE LAW CHRONICLES”) ARE CONTENT CREATORS AND NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN IS INTENDED TO BE OR TO BE CONSTRUED AS FINANCIAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.
YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY. FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES DOES NOT PROMISE OR GUARANTEE ANY INCOME OR PARTICULAR RESULT FROM YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.
ANYONE WHO REPRESENTS THE LAW CHRONICLES WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, ACTUAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOSS OF REVENUE OR INCOME, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, OR SIMILAR DAMAGES, EVEN IF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT WILL THE COLLECTIVE LIABILITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES TO ANY PARTY (REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE) EXCEED THE GREATER OF $100 OR THE AMOUNT YOU HAVE PAID TO THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) FOR THE INFORMATION, PRODUCT OR SERVICE OUT OF WHICH LIABILITY AROSE.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ANYONE WHO REPRESENTS THE LAW CHRONICLES AT ANY TIME BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY YOUR RELIANCE ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO EVALUATE THE ACCURACY. COMPLETENESS OR USEFULNESS OF ANY INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE, OR OTHER CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN. PLEASE SEEK THE ADVICE OF PROFESSIONALS, AS APPROPRIATE, REGARDED THE EVALUATION OF ANY SPECIFIC INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE, OR OTHER CONTENT.
Zoom Is a registered trademark by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Wow first time I seen the judge dismissed a case and not just go off what the cop said. It was refreshing to see. All in my opinion.🇺🇸✊🏻
Yeah it's rare but it happens. Adams has a couple others if you watch through all the videos. Judge Brown has a few on the 3/10 stream. Crown also has one, although it's on a weird technicality with an accident case.
Those who give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
Good for her for fighting the ticket when she knew she didn’t do anything wrong!
That attorney deserves all his retainer! The pictures were just the cherry on top.
Without an attorney , unless there is an error on the summons or you can PROVE something contrary with pictures , etc. , it's usually your word against the police . It generally doesn't end well .
They’re counting on you just paying the tickets cause it’s cheaper. Always like a good fight got to keep them honest
Oh! I see what she was saying! She meant that if the cop saw a metallic car blow a stop sign that he might’ve pulled her over on accident thinking that was her but she was never at that stop sign and he didn’t believe her. Not only that he’s pretending he “doesn’t recall” other cars there and doesn’t even remember talking to the defendant. Cute. 🙄
Should object to him reading from his ticket
I think I can beat this bullshit case now. Thanks for sharing
I am not telling people to run Stop Signs . However , most are technically illegal . They do not comply with one or more items as outlined in the MUTCD . Unfortunately , unless you are an attorney , most judges will NOT listen to the public or make a lame excuse to find you guilty in spite of evidence presented .
This judge does not have corrupt spirit lives inside him u can tell by his Angelica face . He has holly spirits in him . When u have dark spirit in u it manifest on ur face. That cop case has lots of angry spirits in him.
Another dishonest cop
One issue is did you fall to avoid a collision? If not I would ask what damage did my actions result cause. No damage No contract No case. That's what I would do in my Case
running stop signs should be legal. Freedom over fear!!
Spot P Diddy 😂
He should have given a warning for the stop sign and gone on his way. Police need to focus on serious issues like speeding
I would have motion for a dismissal due to the fact that he never alleged she failed to avoid a collision. A statue MUST allerdge a damage redress back to the defendant and not just the statute itself . Also the judge is not allowed to take judicial notice of something that hasn't been presented. Remember he is the trier of fact presented. So I would've definitely reserved the error of the judge. Good job I would have objected to him statement to a license. He doesn't even know what the legal definition is. He only knows what it looks like that's it
Why the music and overlay. I wish I could find the live streams for these.
Collier County no longer live streams on CZcams. They moved their live streams to Vimeo. I have yet to see a live stream on Vimeo from the Judges in Collier County.
The overlay and music is to help keep this content under private copyright via The Law Chronicles. This content can be taken by a big CZcams Channel without the permission of The Law Chronicles, making all of its hard work to provide this content go to waste.
Thanks for being here!
Human Trafficking by a paramility agency
.All police powers are to be exercised within Constitutional limits.
Why is background music playing during the video? It’s not really necessary, and why does the music get louder when somebody is speaking and then quieter when nobody speaking kind of hard to hear this way
So… this was cool to see. Gonna go ahead and assume there was no tomfoolery here on the defendant’s side, ie a concocted story between counsel and defendant. It’d be a travesty if so.
But yea, seems easy to prove innocence when you’re actually innocent.
The client might have a well versed back ground in the legal system also. The judge paid peculiar attention to the fact that the client stated there was another car similar to hers, in front of her as she was making the turn. The judge had came to the conclusion that the officer may have gotten the vehicles confused.
To say whats really going on nobody knows. Inside the court room they are all friends on a don’t ask, don’t tell basis. If you know, you know. Follow the script.
I wish you would stop the background 'music'. It's really annoying and also makes is harder to hear the people speaking.
It keeps people from stealing video assets as the music is copyrighted as a watermark! Thanks for your understanding!
@@thelawchronicles Sorry, I didn't know that. now I understand.
Oink oink snorrrrt
how many times is this judge going to ask the cop if he has any further testimony? Seems like he's going overboard trying to get the cop to add anything that might result in a conviction.
I don't feel that way, perhaps you may be a little biased in your view? In fact, this particular judge did what many would not, and ruled in her favor. I was for her as well, btw, but we need to not be objective
Stop signs don't make sense as a requirement. If you stop at YOUR stop signs and intersections, why do you have to worry about being in an accident related to a stop sign violation?? Stop signs should be optional, but I believe in responsibility as if you hit someone eith yor car, the perso wh ran one is at fault. Same with seatbelts
good job.. I got my cop to testify to the intersection written on the ticket where there was no stopsign. I provided court the video showing there was no stopsign. but the ass clown of a court officer still fined me however did a withhold of adjudication. I explained because of the cop testimony under oath of the intersection written on the ticket aligning with the gps numbers also listed and resting his case therefor he could not back peddle. The horrible court officer would not rule. I got something in the mail weeks later. I could appeal it but then the cop would rename the intersection. This was done on zoom so no record would be made of this event sadly. I turned this into a hate like no other towards the police and the system. If OJ could get away with murder I think I deserved a not guilty. btw this was on my birthday none the less..
Civil courts should provide the public with court reporters. Theres numerous occasions when the public will hire a court reporter for a civil case, and the court will continue the court date. Making it difficult to catch the corruptness in the act. Also of you do manage to get in court with a court reporter the court officer will rule in ur favor.. Finding that most court reporters are $200 and hour and a minimum of 2 hours, wouldn’t make it cost effective for a traffic citation.
What’s up with the ridiculous music
Its a watermark for copyrights.
They don't have nothing better to do right? people running red lights and turning with no blinkers in Texas and this cops are focusing on not complete stop? come on !!!
There is a bagel store I like to go to but it was closed. ??
Really? If it’s a regular stop wouldn’t you know if it was closed at 1130 Am?
BS. Should have convicted her.
The judge made the decision on “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Presuming the officer made a mistake of identity pulling over the wrong vehicle. This is the obvious reason.
The less obvious reason can be: The court wont blatantly admit that they are giving the attorney/client a break. To say the least, the attorney is very popular and doesn’t stick his neck out for all of his clients. The less clients he helps the more the courts make. He gets his money regardless.
so will this police got punishmen because he is wrong? is the woman got money if she is right?
This isn't court , this is tax court administration court not a real court in law. You can throw this out completely
Really bad in Ontario city’s right now…witnessed numerous people walking across intersection almost getting hit. Police officer is now watching every day and nailing people every 15 minutes.
You need to completely STOP behind the line! With school kids everywhere it’s not worth the risk to hit someone. A couple of those and you won’t be able to afford insurance….don’t drive like an idiot 😜