Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
What If Everything You Understand About God's Plan Is Wrong
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 01. 2024
- What has the Church hidden from you? Do you know the Truth or just what you have been told? Do you want the rest of the story? Can you handle it? Was Yeshua (Jesus) a Christian? Was He a Pharisaical Jew who died for our sins? Or was He teaching something radical and different than mainstream Judaism of his day taught, something different than Mainstream Christianity today? Something that got Him killed and His message hidden after His ascension? Is the Truth still out there, buried in long-forgotten books and vague historical references by the very men that wiped out the original faith and message once delivered to the saints? I invite you to join me as I search out the original Faith of the Yeshua and the 12 Apostles.
Follow me on Gab TV and Odysee also:
tv.gab.com/cha...
odysee.com/@Da...
Welcome to the short / lil season we have been waiting for you.
I appreciate and love your teaching of the Truth and Clear understanding of Sacred Scripture!
FYI: I see Jealousy as A pure heart jealous fir their beloved to love them in that pure way but they do not! As Does GOD Himself do for his people who have gone astray!
Big Difference from Envy: to covet people, things…etc!
Great teaching
Thank you!
Very, very interesting stuff !! I just discovered your channel today. I will soon be watching all of your videos.
Thanks 🙏
“Ben Joseph”
Awesome, thank you!
The first clarification needs to be "there is no NT or OT." These are misleading constructs invented by replacement theology. There is the scripture and the inspired apostolic commentary and application of the scripture.
@tkinnc1 I don't really see the point of arguing over semantics and terminology of this sort. When someone says "New Testament" or "Old Testament" everyone knows what you're speaking about, and I don't really see a problem with either term. The more we argue about terminology the less we will discuss the misunderstandings of the substance of the writings themselves. With the way society is falling apart and becoming more wicked (literally by the day) I feel like we have bigger issues to address than that. I don't want to argue over the color of the living room drapes while the house is burning down around us.
People have used the argument that the legal term for a "testament" is a will, and that using the word is akin to saying that testator (God) is dead, but that is only one definition of the word. A "testament" can also mean "a statement of belief" or "something that stands as tangible proof or evidence." I believe that 99% of the people who use the term "testament" are using it in the context of the latter two definitions.
If your issue is with "old" and "new", one is older than the other, so the terms are accurate. If certain people try to use "old" to indicate "invalid" we can change the terms to whatever we want but they will still try to claim that the Tanach is invalid either way.
There is no replacement theology. It’s a term invented by Zionist heretics to smear the real gospel.
Thank you brother. This was mind blowing. I knew all the stuff about the Jews being Edom however I didnt know about the end times correlations the way you packaged this together. Very well done. Praise the Most High and His glorious Son. The time is drawing neigh. HalleluYah.
Perhaps.
Maybe we are hanging in the little season.
let me get my popcorn; LOL thanks brother.
Agree, all the hate statements at us, some times we wonder why we do it.
Funny,. I just finished a video on Jhn 8:31-39 before i saw this, about the Jews not being slaves.
thank you wow, fun.
I just watched it. I like the thing you said about the 99 who don't need to repent, that was a different perspective.
Oh, and you are right, the Paulinists are not happy, LOL.
The prophets spoke of not shredding innocent blood.
THE FATHER wants a contrite heart. Fallowing HIS GOOD commandments without the shedding of innocent blood of animals. So if MESSIAH came where’s the world peace, lion laying down with the lamb, and Hebrews gathered. Father’s hearts turned to their sons and daughters?
@lauratempestini5719 I'm not following what you saying. We are in the time before the regathering, before New Jerusalem, before satan and his sin-a-gog are defeated, before Gog and Magog. Why would you expect to see those things before all of that occurs?
❤🙏🙏🙏
David, I am amazed at the thoroughness of your research and your presentations.
I'm still a relative newcomer to your channel, and I'm still not sure how far I can go with your primary ideas. But I think you work represents an excellent effort and discipline. At the very least I should thank you for the opportunity for a deeper and broader understanding.
It is interesting that you seem to be a non-dispensational preterist, and, I presume, a non-Zionist. It is interesting because other non-dispensational non-Zionists I have listened to usually rely heavily on Paul's epistles for their scriptural support.
John 8:44, was mis-translated in all the Bibles, and should Read;
“Ye are from the father of the devil”
Not - “Ye are of your father the devil”
This would make much more sense, because how could the devil be a murderer and liar from the beginning, if he was a chief angel and choir director in Heaven before he fell?
It would make no sense for Yahweh the God of the Bible to promote an angel named Lucifer to lead musician status, if Lucifer was a Liar and Murderer from the beginning!?
Scholar; April D. DeConick writes:
With the article preceding πατρὸς, the phrase τοῦ διαβόλου is a genitive phrase modifying the nominal phrase ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς. Thus:
'Ye are from the father of the Devil'
If the statement were to mean, as the standard English translation renders it,
'Ye are of your father the Devil',
then the article preceding πατρὸς would not be present. In this case the word 'father' would be in the predicate position and could be expanded with an appositional phrase τοῦ διαβόλου, a grammatical decision the author of John makes in 8.56 with reference to 'Abraham, your father'
('Ἀβραὰμ ὁ πατὴρ ὑμῶν').
April D. DeConick, John's Gospel and Intimations of the Apocalyptic, Bloomsbury, 2013. p. 150.
But technically Yeh Ho VaH is lucifer's Father , how would that fit with what Yeshua was saying to them ?
@scratchticket Thank you for the information, I'll be digging into that.
I posted a video on my Odyssee channel, I didn't make it myself, but the creator of the video makes the case that the Edomites mixed with the seed of Cain and if that is the case it could give credence to the "serpent seed line" theory that Cain's father was the serpent in the garden and not Adam. If that's the case, they would literally be the "sons of the devil".
Here's the link to the video if you'd like to watch it: odysee.com/@DavidHNotsari:0/origin-of-the-jews-%28-cain---kenites--canaanites---edomites:c?r=5DbJ8ih1vf6fyQvAMUx3393zkyHyRvUj
@@DavidHNotsari I believe in the serpent seed , I don't adhere to the "kindergarten version" that we've all been taught
Yacob father of the 12 tribes, Yishmael father of 12 great princes, Esau father of liars.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul, all roads lead to Rome. 🙃
If we want the truth we have to be able to receiver the truth.
I like this information. Connect the dots
We can't be after the 1000 years or prophesy is wrong. Where's new Jerusalem? Do the nations go to NJ to seek Yahuahs ways? If NJ came it'd still be there too. You were doing good talking about all the deception then you come out with that. If you are right prophesy is wrong. I always go with what Yah says.
@Bouncer83 This is where knowing Scripture comes in handy. I said that we are at Revelation 20:7-8 where Satan is released and is deceiving the nations. New Jerusalem doesn't appear until Revelation 21. The 1000 years of ruling and reigning with Christ was the time when satan was bound, the gospel was able to be spread for the most part unhindered and there were entire continents that were Christian, Christian Kings ruling in Christian Ways, and Nations that were unarguably Christian.
New Jerusalem comes down from heaven doesn’t it.
Where's Yahusha in all this? He doesn't have a 3rd coming so he's still on earth and the rest of his followers. You think he's in Jerusalem now chilling with the pharisee jews? Knowing scripture comes in handy all the time. You keep saying christian too, you might want to look into how that's a deception like all the other religions. As far as timelines I think Revelation 6 as if Yahusha was just after ruling for 1000 years there wouldn't be so much confusion with religions and doctrines.
A Christian always want the truth no matter what!!!
Absolutely! We cannot worship in Spirit and Truth if we reject the Spirit of Truth... or truth in general.
Language is where people are deceived. Libs are experts in this, that is why there is political debate over "woman's healthcare" not infanticide. I don't except the premise that there are 2 bibles. one for jew and one for gentile. When we use their words (which have certain meaning, nuance and presumptions, we are excepting their meaning , nuance and presumptions.
See : our Father's Plan
Shepherds Student 😁.
If you reject Paul then you reject the Bible as authoritative and thus you aren’t a Christian. You’re going face harsh judgement from God for leading others astray - your soul depends on this so you better be 1000000% certain about your convictions - good luck with that.
@kickpublishing If you accept Paul as an Apostle then you reject Jesus because he warned against Paul and Paul teaches things that contradict Jesus. czcams.com/video/wZpxz9uNwgs/video.html
I believe that Jesus has the the power to save, and that he does not need any help from Paul. If you believe that acceptance of Paul is necessary for salvation you have made Paul your "lord and savior", and kicked Jesus off the throne because you don't think He is good enough to save me by himself.
If you think that Paul is an Apostle, you are the one rejecting the Bible as authoritative, not me, because you have to reject more Scripture to accept him than I do to reject him. czcams.com/video/_UKyWcBfRQY/video.html
If I'm not a Christian because I follow the teachings of Christ and not Paul I'll be in good company because Jesus and the Apostles were apparently not "Christians" either seeing as how they denied Paul's "apostleship" too. czcams.com/video/l8SklRjJ3jw/video.html czcams.com/video/5GobYh6Px08/video.html
At the end of the day you are going to have to explain to Jesus why you followed a man who confessed to being demon-possessed, a liar, a blasphemer, and preaching a "different Jesus" than the 12 Apostles; rather than following Himself, the man who died on the cross for you. I pray that you watch the videos I shared above and repent before that day comes.
Funny how a Paulin follower comes out with name calling and accusations but no logical disagreement. They can't think for themselves because another man is their father(rabbi, pastor) not Jesus. They trust a man with their own salvation.
How do you explain the mathematical equations of mentions of names in the Bible authorizing Jesus signature? Truth is Christ channel.
You can put two sticks together so that they form a cross... Just saying.
Absolutely!