2019 Hyundai Elantra SEL 2.0L (147 HP) TEST DRIVE

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 12. 08. 2020
  • A special thanks to Patriot Military Automobiles for this car! To find the cars they have in stock you can go to their webpage here:
    www.patriot-autos.net/
    Patriot Military Automobiles CZcams Channel:
    / @patriotmilitaryautomo...
    You can also Follow them on Instagram here: / patriot_military_autom...
    Thank you!
    Amazon (US)
    GoPro: amzn.to/2SuPfb3
    Camcorder: amzn.to/2VYLPzD
    Amazon (DE)
    GoPro: amzn.to/3eL7AdF
    Camcorder: amzn.to/3cCB37o
    2019 Hyundai Elantra SEL 2.0L
    109 kW / 147 HP
    2.0L Petrol Gasoline Engine
    2000 cm3 / 122.0 CUI
    4-Cylinder
    178 Nm / 132 ft-lbs
    6-Speed Automatic
    TEST DRIVE by Izeezy
    Interior & Cockpit Design
    Exterior Design
    Driving & Sound / POV
    Computer & Entertaiment on Board
    Light Night Design
    Fuel Consumption from 50 to 100 mph (80 to 160 km/h)
    Acceleration 0-115 mph
    Top Speed German Autobahn
  • Auta a dopravní prostředky

Komentáře • 25

  • @JosedVS1
    @JosedVS1 Před rokem +4

    GREAT VIDEO!! WELL EXPLAINED WITHOUT THE NEED TO SPEAK, AND SHOWING THE VEHICLE AT NIGHT

  • @CristianP
    @CristianP Před 3 lety +4

    Naturally aspirated engine ! 💪
    Very reliable choice ! 🏆

  • @irielouhenriette2254
    @irielouhenriette2254 Před 2 lety +2

    The test drive is perfect

  • @Fromrish
    @Fromrish Před rokem +1

    Is there any front camera?

  • @alvaroosorio8690
    @alvaroosorio8690 Před 2 měsíci

    Quiero saber si los Elantra SEL tienen sistema ECO

  • @user-oh6ii3zw8i
    @user-oh6ii3zw8i Před 7 měsíci

    Сколько моделей в этой элантра?

  • @ProtegeTuype
    @ProtegeTuype Před 3 lety +1

    US model...

  • @davidcasas3862
    @davidcasas3862 Před 3 lety +1

    Those consumption numbers can't be well. I think this engine is indirect injection and find a 2.0 l.engine with 3.1 liter at 80, 4,2 at 100 and 5 l at 120 is almost impossible unless the measurement is done in a downhill. More, with a 6a. gear of almost 50 km/h each 1000 rpm and 178 Nm of torque you can imagine the continuos dance of the gearbox....good review!!!!!

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  Před 3 lety +1

      we always test on flat road, we did do from West Kaiserslautern to near Waldmohr Autobahn Exit, this testing road is 25 km long and maximal +/- 10 meter altitude from 25 km road distance! :) and we try test fuel without windy weather! Up to maximal 10km/h wind speed :) you can check it out on Google Earth or special Maps where you can check the Altitude Sea level that you can know if the road is flat or light downhill for long distance that you think its flat, but we always check the road when we are in another area :)

    • @davidcasas3862
      @davidcasas3862 Před 3 lety

      @@TESTDRIVEFREAK well, I'm totally amazed. This engine must be the most economic N/A 2l. engine of all the times!!!! ;)

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  Před 3 lety +1

      But we are not sure if the computer telling us right numbers, but it can be up to +1 liter real fuel usage than computer telling us

    • @davidcasas3862
      @davidcasas3862 Před 3 lety

      @@TESTDRIVEFREAK it would be still pretty well!!!! And more for a "normal" indirect injection engine.Sometimes in the computer of my Pulsar appears 4,3-4,5 at 120. But then I whisper: "Fucking liar"and after that appears 5,5-6. All is ok. Welcome to the normality.....

    • @CristianP
      @CristianP Před 3 lety +3

      Long life to narurally aspirated engines !!! 💪
      But Europe wants turbocharged 3 cylinder ones for their shitty emissions checks 🙈🤣

  • @napim6752
    @napim6752 Před 3 lety +4

    Slow for 2.0 147 hp

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  Před 3 lety +2

      yes it was slow, but this car is good for long distance cruise :)

    • @fwebe2871
      @fwebe2871 Před 3 lety +1

      I dont't get your point WTFDUDE.
      Acceleration = Force/ Mass or Acceleration = Power/ Velocity/ Mass.
      I don't see, where displacement appears in that equation.
      I also dont't get, why this car should be slow. About 9 - 10 s for 0 to 100 km/ h is what you would expect of this car.
      Maybe your expectation is the problem.
      For comparison: How quick are other cars with about 190 Nm of Torque?

    • @brandonblack2095
      @brandonblack2095 Před 3 lety +2

      Bugatti Chiron is faster much faster