Ridgid's new for 2020 18v Compact Vacuum R860902B

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
  • R860902b vs R86090
    Comparison and review of Ridgid's new 18 volt brushed compact vacuum and the 3 year old(new for the comparison) brushless 18volt wet/dry compact vac.
    We do a side by side comparison and show why the 3 year old model had so many negative reivews, and what Ridgid has done to improve the stick vacuum.
    Links to the Tools on HomeDepot.com
    New R860902B
    www.homedepot....
    3 year old R86090
    www.homedepot....
    #TeamRidgid
    #Ridgid
    #Subcompact
    #TheHomeDepot
    #newridgidtools
    #ridgidpowertools
    #RidgidVacuum
    #Ridgid18volt
    chill. by sakura Hz / sakurahertz Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0 creativecommons... Music promoted by Audio Library • Chill - sakura Hz (No ...

Komentáře • 47

  • @baumanco
    @baumanco Před 4 lety +6

    1. Old one looks better to me.
    2. Both models need the pre-filter removed.
    3. Cleaning the normal filter on the old one couldn't be easier. Take it out, smack it against the bucket or ground, pop it back in. The new one looks like a pain in the ass to quickly clean it.
    4. The floor tool works great on the old one and the new one looks like it is one of those tools that doesn't create suction unless you get the angle just right.
    5. I would throw it out the window after the first time of taking the extension wand off and it dumping the contents on my clean floor. Let alone if it did it when I ran out of battery and couldn't clean up the mess the vacuum just made for me.
    Great comparison video sir! Thank you for the real world examples!

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety +2

      Thanks for the comments! I twisted the canister off this afternoon and dumped saw dust all over the place. Ugh! And your right, cleaning this filter makes a mess... I think ridgid is trying to copy the makita designs... (and now sub compact drill/ impact)

  • @ted1558
    @ted1558 Před 4 lety +3

    The old one i returned it next day, because is way too loud !!
    The new one is smaller, much less loud and the same power.... so that is the one !!
    Thank you for your video !

  • @williamloi5959
    @williamloi5959 Před 4 lety +7

    Speeak LOUDER!!!

  • @sanjay4real
    @sanjay4real Před 4 lety +2

    just the video I was looking for!...someone who compares the two models side by side.... cheers from Canada :)

  • @Engineer-Machinist
    @Engineer-Machinist Před 3 lety

    I use the Dyson cordless vacuums occasionally at work. The old Ridgid vacuum that I bought was pathetic in comparison so I took it back about a month after buying it. It looks like the newer model still has a ways to go (likely brushless or something with more power) before I buy one. Thank you for taking the time to make this video. It has saved me the time, headache, and product waste of trying out the new one.

  • @TrippsMedia
    @TrippsMedia Před 4 lety +2

    Nice REVIEW keep up the good work.... Can't wait to see the next ones!!!! Glad you liked the tool I posted

  • @mikaelsparky
    @mikaelsparky Před 3 lety +1

    Great review, as an Electrician,I face the same tasks you have described. I have the old vac and it was terrible, thought the new one might be better, but I didn't think to just remove the prefilter! Just saved me $145 CAD. Awesome review. Subscribed based on this video!

  • @floobertuber
    @floobertuber Před 4 lety +1

    Very thorough comparison. I've been wondering why there need to be two hand vacs in the lineup, and this helps show some of the more subtle differences. Thanks a lot!

  • @bunberrier
    @bunberrier Před 3 lety

    Thank you! I chose the new one based on the hand balance and cost.

  • @daviddeveloper44
    @daviddeveloper44 Před 3 lety

    I will wait until the vacuum is 50% to 75% off
    Excellent review of the two generations

  • @MrAtomicBulldog
    @MrAtomicBulldog Před 4 lety

    Excellent video. I like your side by side comparison. I have the older model but obviously the newer one has some distinct improvements and a considerable size and noise advantage.. Thank you.

  • @Dustysa4
    @Dustysa4 Před 4 lety +1

    This style vacuum really needs a cyclonic dust chamber for the filters to stay unclogged for any reasonable amount of time. Makita sells an add-on unit (may work on other models, not sure), but they want ~$50 for the chamber, it's bulky, and adds a fair amount of weight to the overall unit. I wish one of the big tool brands would design a cordless stick vacuum with a built in cyclonic chamber, a pleated filter, and at least 50cfm of air movement.

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      The makita inlet is the opposite size. The wands will work on each other's vac but inverted. Thx for the comment!

  • @bluemantom77
    @bluemantom77 Před 2 lety

    My friend had told me about this video last year I forgot the comment on it I have used your idea of my vacuum works like a champ it's not as powerful as what I saw the new one that replaces the r860902 for $59.00

  • @benjaminallen2370
    @benjaminallen2370 Před 4 lety

    Thanks was looking for this comparo! As usual I ordered one (old, HD “Special Buy” with 1.5ah batt) then did more research. Seems close though

  • @sketchyj1291
    @sketchyj1291 Před 4 lety +1

    What you are calling the pre filter on the older vacuum from what I understand is only meant to be used for wet applications to protect the filter from water. just like how you change to a wet filter in a normal shop vac.

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      The owner's manual calls it the pre-filter and says to clean it with water, make sure it's completely dry before reinstalling. It can't be installed by itself, the pleated filter has the gasket that seals the canister... I agree with you, it would work better if using it for wet applications. Thanks for the comment!

  • @941Earl
    @941Earl Před 4 lety +2

    It looked like the new one had decent suction power with the pre-filter removed, but struggled picking up all of the dust as quickly as the old version. I feel from watching the video, that the new vacuum may have done a better job with the floor attachment that comes with the older vacuum. Have you tried swapping the old floor attachment onto the wand of the new tool?

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety +1

      I'm using this week as it came out of the box, but I think your right. Probably going with old floor tool. Thx for the comment!

  • @TheSubtleamuzement
    @TheSubtleamuzement Před 4 lety

    Solid video. My recommendation would be to get a tripod of some sort the body sway at the end of the video is not ideal. You can get cheap ones like the Guerilla Tripod that can hold a hearty camera. Also, do a decibel test on these tools as it would be a solid aspect to add-in.

  • @daviddeveloper44
    @daviddeveloper44 Před 3 lety +1

    Maybe i missed it. Why do you have so many compact vacuums

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 3 lety +1

      Have had the first/brushless model for several years. Was adding a vac to our other van, so I wanted to see the differences. And now I’ve actually switched to the makita stick vac with cyclonic chamber in my van. 95% of Sheetrock dust gets caught in cylclonic chamber and not in the filter.

  • @chicox37
    @chicox37 Před 4 lety

    Good video. I wanted to see this comparison. I have a Black and Decker hand vacuum, and I have the battery Ridgid platform so I thought about buying the Ridgid vacuum. I thought that the old Ridgid vacuum is loud, and the new one is the same, I better keep the Black And Black hands vacuum and buy another tool from Ridgid like the new Blower. Can you make a comparison of the job site blowers?

  • @reynardgrimm2811
    @reynardgrimm2811 Před 2 lety

    In Australia, the new model comes with the same head that's on the brushless, which makes it useless. The head on the Rigid new model is clearly superior. What a disappointment.

  • @rbeichner2001
    @rbeichner2001 Před 2 lety

    Will these run with a 2amp battery
    Just getting into the Ridgid stuff and that’s what they came with

    • @donniemccrorie19
      @donniemccrorie19 Před 2 lety

      Yes, but they don’t last long. Maybe 5 -7 minutes of continuous use. Better to spot clean if you only have 2 ah batteries. I use the 4 ah most of the time to clean up after our tv installs.

  • @LegendMuscle
    @LegendMuscle Před 4 lety

    this the one that only costs 50$?? great deal, great review. thankyou

  • @bcarben93
    @bcarben93 Před 4 lety +1

    No wonder why my old one sucks. Left it in the garage not to be used. 😂

  • @ShawnOBrien14
    @ShawnOBrien14 Před 4 lety

    Great video. Keep it up.

  • @jonf10
    @jonf10 Před 4 lety

    Old brushless was rated as wet/dry. That’s the biggest reason I’d want to purchase one of those before they sell out. Has anyone ever tested wet capabilities of the brushless?

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      Haven't tried it on anything wet. Workshopaddicts review from 3 years ago sucked up water. It did it, maybe if you spilled a drink or something small.

  • @firstlast5139
    @firstlast5139 Před 4 lety

    Nice review.

  • @jamesdistefanis2183
    @jamesdistefanis2183 Před 4 lety

    I could not hear what you were saying. Recorded voice volume way to low.

  • @naiusany
    @naiusany Před 4 lety

    Great Job.
    I like ur candid opinion.
    Just one question
    Is the motor same on both of them?

    • @donniemccrorie19
      @donniemccrorie19 Před 4 lety

      No. The new $49 has a brushed motor. The older model is brushless. Thx

    • @naiusany
      @naiusany Před 4 lety

      If u had to buy one which one would by. Home depo near me had both of then in stock..and I really want to get one.

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      @@naiusany I'm keeping the original, brushless model on the van. I tried the new one for a couple of weeks. I twisted the canister off by accident 3 times. I'm keeping it in the workshop for small jobs around the house, but not for everyday work . Thx.

  • @jayjayhooksch1
    @jayjayhooksch1 Před 4 lety

    I have the older model, and it does clog up real quick. Never thought about not using the prefilter, as I assumed the problem was the main filter.
    Both the pre filter and the main filter are washable on the old model (I know because I wash them both and neither falls apart or feels soggy or susceptible to water damage). Is the main filter on the new one washable?
    And another quick question. Do you find any tangible difference between using a standard battery and an octane battery when using these vacuums? I know they aren't octane tools, but conflicting reports say octane makes a slight difference even in non octane tools.

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      The filters on the new vac are washable. The higher ah rated batteries don't seem to make the vac suck any harder, just last longer. Thx for the comment!

    • @jayjayhooksch1
      @jayjayhooksch1 Před 4 lety

      @@donniestoolthoughts9209 thanks for the quick response!

  • @konamanstudio2447
    @konamanstudio2447 Před 4 lety

    And you were talking on your video you are a guest far away from your mic but when the vacuums went the volume one up so high I had to turn down the volume then when you try to talk I had to turn up the volume trying to hear you attachments work on each other's vacuum alright you take care😷🍻🍺

  • @daviddeveloper44
    @daviddeveloper44 Před 3 lety

    Its 49 now. Not 59.

  • @revopilot5979
    @revopilot5979 Před 4 lety +2

    Old one’s better

    • @donniestoolthoughts9209
      @donniestoolthoughts9209  Před 4 lety

      I accidentally open that canister 1 more time and it's done... I do like the longer extension tube.

  • @bentech8887
    @bentech8887 Před 3 lety

    i own it and its not that powerful.