Nah, not a disguise. Cruise missiles and Air-Air Missiles are designed completely different because they have different roles. Cruise missiles like the modern LRASM look like planes because they are meant to fly very long distances, meaning that they are much heavier. But air-air missiles or SAMs are meant to reach mach 2-4 speeds in seconds and are meant to pull really high G forces to hit moving targets. The magic of Aerodynamics!
How thick was the concrete and how many PSI is it and any rebars??? I've seen bunker busting shaped charge that was stopped by 20 ft (6 meters) of reinforced 12,000 PSI concrete. If it was 20 ft (6 meters) thick 5,000 PSI concrete it wouldn't had penetrate it...
@@lars7747 that is not a scientific answer at all...Azovstal steel plant...the Russian bunker busting bombs didn't do much to that nuclear rated bunkers at all, BUT the Azov Ukrainians STILL had to come out of their bunker and surrender (not because their bunkers were breached). But because they were running out of their food and ammo and had to surrender...
It exits almost intact, when the armor is to thick to penetrate, it wil still be somewhat effective. so, it will weaken it, then the charge will go trough the rest of the armor I don’t work in the military, so I could be wrong
@@Nikgamingnl it is "common sense" that anything can stop a projectile if it's thick enough. You can stop missile strikes even if you have enough layers of cottons. Couple miles or kilometers thick of cottons will stop a missile I'm pretty sure. As far as concrete. Steel is WAYYY harder to penetrate than concrete. Concrete is hard BUT very brittle and will fracture.
@@7150285 I know that concrete is strong but brittle at the same time, my grandfather was working in the building sector, he has even build some schools(grade 7-12 school, (converted from Dutch system to American system)), so I know a bit about the strength and weakness of concrete, if the armor is thick enough, it will probably do enough damage so that it is vulnerable to further attacks(if the armor is very tick, it may not do any damage, or it needs another missile attack to make it vulnerable)
Cruise missile are just autonomous UAV with a really big APHE warhead welded in place
That’s going to be really easy to intercept going that slow?! I could run faster than this! Packs a hell of a punch though
😂😂😂😂😂 idiot lol
Slow motion idiot
That’s cause it’s in slow motion
@@Popmotion.😂
I see someone did not bother to read the caption. 👀
So they disguised cruise missiles as planes.
Now I get it
Was thinking the same thing
Pentagon 9/11
Nah, not a disguise. Cruise missiles and Air-Air Missiles are designed completely different because they have different roles. Cruise missiles like the modern LRASM look like planes because they are meant to fly very long distances, meaning that they are much heavier. But air-air missiles or SAMs are meant to reach mach 2-4 speeds in seconds and are meant to pull really high G forces to hit moving targets. The magic of Aerodynamics!
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.
😂lmfao
Brutal, first penetrate anything and then the warhead booms. Anihillation.
GET THAT UP YA!
What is that wall made off,chalk? The missiles came with no damage after penetrating it
concrete, it was a bunker buster bomb, made out of artillery bore to penetrate thick bunker concrete layer
@@FarokhBulsara4065 well those missiles are really strong
Arabs : thank you so much guy, go easy on us plz
How thick was the concrete and how many PSI is it and any rebars??? I've seen bunker busting shaped charge that was stopped by 20 ft (6 meters) of reinforced 12,000 PSI concrete. If it was 20 ft (6 meters) thick 5,000 PSI concrete it wouldn't had penetrate it...
Well it ended a war so the answer is "enough"
@@lars7747 that is not a scientific answer at all...Azovstal steel plant...the Russian bunker busting bombs didn't do much to that nuclear rated bunkers at all, BUT the Azov Ukrainians STILL had to come out of their bunker and surrender (not because their bunkers were breached). But because they were running out of their food and ammo and had to surrender...
@@lars7747 bunker busting didn't do much to Azovstal Steel Plant. Due to how well that nuclear rated bunker was built...
enemy cruise missile incoming
wrr
Uh I thought this footage was bomb test footage called, Bunker Buster test?
FUCKEN BANG!
9/11
I put it in slo mo mo
Oh… alrighty then
Wtc2.....................Parece...quando sai do outro lado....
US techologies is 20 years ahead of everybody
*German technology
what type of explosion they use?
anti personnel
Now this is recruiting.
V/r
🍌🍍
Reinforced concrete?? I bet couple of thick steel slabs could defeat even a missile...
wr
It exits almost intact, when the armor is to thick to penetrate, it wil still be somewhat effective. so, it will weaken it, then the charge will go trough the rest of the armor
I don’t work in the military, so I could be wrong
@@Nikgamingnl it is "common sense" that anything can stop a projectile if it's thick enough. You can stop missile strikes even if you have enough layers of cottons. Couple miles or kilometers thick of cottons will stop a missile I'm pretty sure. As far as concrete. Steel is WAYYY harder to penetrate than concrete. Concrete is hard BUT very brittle and will fracture.
@@7150285 I know that concrete is strong but brittle at the same time, my grandfather was working in the building sector, he has even build some schools(grade 7-12 school, (converted from Dutch system to American system)), so I know a bit about the strength and weakness of concrete, if the armor is thick enough, it will probably do enough damage so that it is vulnerable to further attacks(if the armor is very tick, it may not do any damage, or it needs another missile attack to make it vulnerable)
@@Nikgamingnl mountains can defeats MULTIPLE and MULTIPLE missile strikes...nuclear explosion could barely damage mountains either.
czcams.com/video/l1OqbwtIPy4/video.html
czcams.com/video/EL7oeu3_syQ/video.html
czcams.com/video/xDSacMvwnFo/video.html