Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
What if women never had to give birth again? - BBC REEL
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 08. 2024
- The idea of human ectogenesis - growing a baby in an artificial environment outside of the human body - has always been considered in the realms of science fiction, however it may not be for much longer.
Scientific developments in this field have been taking big steps forward in recent years, particularly in our ability to care for extremely preterm babies. However, just how close are we to being able to create human life entirely outside of the human body?
And in a potential future, where women no longer had to give birth, what societal impacts might that have on gender equality and our conceptions of what it means to be a mother?
Video by Izabela Cardoso & Fernando Teixeira
I can have children without women ❤
Me without men
@@rikimuoi6132 woman do it already with sperm donors, this gives men equality.
Shame on you. Real men love their wives like Christ loves His church. Real Men are protectors and fiercely love their families.
You should not raise a child alone or with a woman until you mature.
@@rikimuoi6132 what is the use of women if men had baby without women, because this world run by men not women, the only main use of women in this world is for reproduction 😂 and here you fail then no other use
@@marisabullock3065 lol many women aren't wife or good mother material in this day and age Go find a Christ era loyal wife and good mother then we marry
Good.
Now single men can have children.
That should give everyone peace. Children alone with adult single men.
@@marisabullock3065yes children with single fathers are more successful than children with single mothers according to data.
or gay couples, infertile people, single men or women, the possibility are endless with this technology.
Yeah I want kids, but women are extremely difficult nowadays. Let them do whatever they want, society needs to move on 🎉
@@SafavidAfsharid3197men should becomes the ones who stay at home than.
As a woman who has had 2 ectopic pregnancies and gestational diabetes, I really hope future generations have an alternative for the old fashioned way as with all three of my pregnancies death was definitely possible.
With this tech we dont need women and sciensts found way with 2 sprems can make baby in artifical uterus
The old fashioned way? 😆🤦♀️
Wow.
Ectogenesis seems like an extension of things like IVF. Most people won't use it, but those who do will see it as revolutionary because it will be their only option aside from adoption. Also helping premature babies would be amazing.
Babies need to grown in a human womb. It needs that love, the spiritual connection. This will just create Romanian orphanages all over again
@@monakeulen5622 the only people who would use it would be people who really want a child, creating an orphanage crisis like the one in Romania would only happen if scientists decided to grow thousands of babies without parents asking, which would never happen. This would be super expensive and potential parents would pay a ton. They would have to love that baby and want a deep connection to go through with this.
It is great news for men!
Finaly a man can have children like a woman can..
Which makes for an equal Society
Great times to be alive :)
Some creepy men would do it for the wrong reasons and some don’t even have an idea of how to raise a kid. It would take full dedication because at the end of the day the baby is till a human not a toy
@@Iconmusethere is a lot of female that don't have an idea to how to raise a kid.
In theory- in reality the vast majority of men just want to pass their genes but they don’t actually want to be fathers, parents and raise the kids. They only “have” kids bc they aren’t really having and raising them themselves, bc women are doing 99,9% of everything. I’m all for this tech both for the possibility of liberating women from the pregnancy burden but also bc it will make even clearer and undeniable that the vast majority of men don’t actually want to be real parents.
@Iconmuse its better to born to a creepy man than a sl++
@@IconmuseIt would be same for woman too
Back in the wave of the Women's Liberation movement of the late '60s, this possibility was being discussed. Some saw it as the ultimate liberation of women, freeing them from the dangers of pregnancy and childbirth. Others warned that such a technology would be in the hands and the control of men. Most disturbingly, the opinion was floated that once men could create their own sons, females would be rapidly exterminated. That thought has haunted me ever since. The older I get, the more I fear it is true.
that’s a correct logical conclusion if replicating more XY is the **ONLY** thing XX are valued for… 🤔
You wanted the rights of men. Nature will clap down and put that imbalance to rest. You ladies had your shot. It's men's turn and your fearful because you realize how powerless you really are
@@barrontrump3943 Gee, can't imagine why no woman would want to have your baby.
@@barrontrump3943 This Invention will make walking psychopaths, in order for a person to develop to have empathy they have to have an emotional attachment to their mother.
@@tativanii3245 lol
There might be important developmental processes that are missed as a result of the mother/gestational carrier-child connection being lost. Science doesn't know everything about how humans develop in the uterus. Remember the Eastern European children who were left in cribs decades ago because no one knew the importance of constant connection for children. Maybe things like hearing the internal sounds of a body or feeling the warmth of a human body is part of the developmental process. The first children born this way will be the ones to show the effects, if this is an issue.
...or being born to a living mother!
Exactly!
They know that a fetus need a living uterus, but they don't care. Since first conception, the embryon is adapting to the inputs the mother gives.
I remember that horrific, very sad unfortunate event for those children in Romania. I can cry just by thinking about it. I think it's important for a baby to grow inside a human womb. To be with its mother is a comforting and extremely meaningful thing, even on a cellular level, the love that's passed on through hormones, electricity, movement, voice, tummy rubs, and just the fact that the baby knows it's mother is near. I think it's important for brain development. I think the child would really know the absence of a human mother in the womb, and it could have negative effects.
Or being born through the vaginal or c-section...where the former gets an increased dose of bacteria and have a stronger immunity. (Not against the tech, just something to think about)
I have two children and I would opt to have an eternal pregnancy. Pregnancy is hard on the woman’s body and the after birth is even worse (with your body being stretched and hormones).
Depends on the age and health of the Mother.Its not that bad in your late 20's-early 30's
There's a Japanese mystery novel title that translates to Balloon Town (not sure if there's ever an official translation) that mentions artificial uterus. My first reaction was "When can we have this? 😂" That was in 2005; today, the US still has one of the highest maternal mortality rate among 11 other 'developed' countries.
Japan sure could use this, because they are literally dying out right now.
One area that comes to my mind with a technology like this is if countries would be willing to use this to counteract declining birth rates. High income countries around the world people are having fewer and fewer kids, so could this be the alternative governments are looking for? And if so how do you solve ethical complications surrounding who are the "parents" of those children?
However, what the world needs is a falling birth rate as we need to limit the plague that is humanity.
It would be stupid for governments to attempt without prospective parents wanting them. 1 in 7 couples struggle with infertility and only 30-40% of couples who do IVF are successful having a child. There are lots of would-be parents out there.
you have to think about why birth rates are declining, which is a whole other issue. As for the governments, they won't get a hold of an artificial uterus in a while, cause technilogy isn't there yet. If there's any success, it'll be used on artificial heart, lung, kidney, liver, those kind of vital organs first. And for your last question, the egg and sperm donner are the parents, like men have always assumed to be
@Diana - you're not familiar with DARPA, are you? All technology is developed for military purposes first, then eventually given to the corporations. If they are "announcing" the development of some new tech, you can bet that tech has already been fully developed and is ready for market. The technology that we know about is 20-50 yrs behind what's really happening.
Foster care and the many prospective couples that couldn't have their own or in this way I guess they could. Human labor will also be less and less relevant as time goes on as the automation and AI revolution ramps up.
This video focuses on the health-aspect of premature baby development. What about genetic-formulation? What about immune-system building? What of the baby's neurological system structure? Will that process of growth be compromised? Are those stages complete by the time babies reach that premature age? These are questions that I wish could be answered in order to provide clarification that this type of technology will not produce a dialectical (which means something is solved by a solution but that solution creates an unintended consequence)
Exactly!
This is ridiculous.
@@patricereid333 it's the work of the devil
I wondered about the mental health of the fetus due to the lack of hormonal exchange from the mother. But it's progress and nobody can stop it.
@@Urme4774 My mother die the day after I was born! Wish this technology exist back then probably i have a chance to see my mother!
For preemie babies, I’m excited to hear this. The fact that doctors won’t even bother helping a baby born before a certain number of weeks is so heartbreaking.
I’m nervous to hear that this may be done from moment of conception as the primary method. People already argue about breastfed vs formula, can you imagine this scenario? I’m sure there are countless benefits a fetus gets from natural birth that they just won’t get in an artificial womb.
@Karl Hall eugenics here we come. What if when women want abortions they are told they cannot kill a living being and instead transfer the fetus to these external wombs? Could be an alternative.
There won't be a lot of the downsides too
Yep!
Seeing some insecure females in the comments 🤣
I see only insecure males 🤣
@@user-cn1wv6kr1g Ahh!! The femcel is here
So many ethical, cultural, scientific questions to be discussed on this kind of thing.
Do you think they care? Everything is acceptable in science . After all , there are huge benefits involved.🙄
@@magmartin9726 I think they care, very much so. But I worry that the public at large will politicize and fear monger to the point that the fears outweigh the benefits. It was less than 100 years ago that a heart transplant was unfathomable, let alone a limb, etc.
In some ways this is no different, but it also gets into the core elements that make us human, which is new territory for sure.
@@magmartin9726 I agree with you. It is a business. Women replacement in my opinion.
@@yasnyne What's wrong with freeing women from their reproductive duties? Women keep whining about pregnancy all the time.
@@yasnyne what are you talking about lmao
Its not women replacement,what kind of reactionary thinking its this
It will free women from the restrains of pregnancy
I can keep my body and not go through the pain of childbirth? This could be huge for gender equality.
There is be no you with that tech dont need dishmakers
Exactly
God created this world and all that exists within it. He died bc he gave up his deity as he was born into human form bc He loves you that much & took in the wrath of judgment for your sins and mine so we wouldn’t have to spend eternity in hell.
He made male and female. There is equality btwn us however we have been designed for different purposes. To bear and rear children is a blessing. Your looks will fade regardless of your having children or not.
@@marisabullock3065
If you are a woman and don't support this you are a gender betrayer, and If you are a man you are simply an a**Hol*
@@marisabullock3065
God is probably the first famous Misogynistic being in literature
I think this will bring happiness to every woman who has fertility issues
There is no need women with artifical egg
Make it mandatory that every embryo child be born male
@@raptor3853 there's no need in your existence too😇🥰
@@daryakulygina3082 but this is our world , the world we built .
@@A.s.k008 scientist have bigger impact on making todays age too😇
Millions of people live in poverty, education is a privilege of those born in the right place... This sort of research is funded to largely make rich, multinational companies looking to make even more money....
We should be using resources to raise the living standard of ALL mankind and not to widening the gap between those that have and those unfortunate to be born into lifelong poverty...
EXACTLY
The only way is mandatory vasectomy for men. Then later create clone children via DNA stem cells.
Poverty is created by chasing female we can't afford
That's due to socieconomic organisation,no science
If you want to end the gap ,end neoliberal capitalism
@@user-my4lf4bx6v sure, and replace it with bio-tech CORPORATISM! 🤔 think not. Capitalism is human nature, we are now in age of CORPORATISM. Do not confuse the two.
Agree fully!
I feel like the scientists need to be stopped - they are sooooo naive! If they think the fact that this type of research receives more funding than sustainability research and agriculture is just a coincidence then they are idiots! 🤷🏽♀️
Possible side effects
Clone armies. Organ farms. Eugenics. Auctioning.
yes women are all about their choices, not other people's choices, for those they want to set the rules and be exempted of them too.
They aren't women they are heartless feminist monster satan spawn itself
With artificial wombs, women are even more useless. We can have families without all the drama and manipulation. 🎉
I truly believe this will be great for everyone because
1, We can see the baby growing within Artificial womb.
2, If a women can choose to carry or Artificial birth will be less risk for the mother and unborn child.
3, You can have many babies with this Artificial womb.
I think this should happen because building a family.
Yeah how convenient you left out the babies. I suggest you search Romanian orphanages
But it could be expensive its not that easy am guessing especially for non rich people
You can’t eliminate pain and suffering from this world, but you can create it by separating the mother and child from bonding. If you’ve ever had children you should know the immense emotion that blooms btwn mother and child during the growth occurring in the womb for nine months.
We’re not gods. There is one creator and one design for life He has ordained.
Yes you're right!!!!
Women with uteruses not people with uteruses
Or just... Women?
Dad, where is my mom?
Son, you were born from a bio bag.
atleast Not born from cussy
Bro☠️☠️@@sanatanipandit1166
men will no more need women 💪
Good freedom from those monsters
Nice, only girls will be born without useless moids🎉
why go the long way of artificially replicating an entire organ, instead of making pregnancy and childbirth easier and less risky? It's like saying "we want to solve the problems of heart diseases by making artificial hearts instead of finding ways to treat and prevent heart diseases", sounds absurd, doesn't it? So why for the problem of all the other organs we can research to prevent and solve the problems, but for the uterus, we can't just do the same thing? And if we still don't have the technology to successfully create any other major human organs, why do you think we can with the uterus?
I don't really think it is possible to make easier and less risky because it would be growing inside the mother. They would have surely found a way by now if it was possible.
Yes, we will evolve into a new human species that can no longer carry children in the womb like the rest of eutherian mammals! Women will evolve to have narrower pelvic bones, no longer wide enough to push a child out. This is placing all of our eggs in one basket with technology. Once there ever is a global power outage that lasts longer than a few years, such as the case with a solar storm, then we will go extinct, unable to go back to producing children organically. This is madness.
An idea would be to surgically implant the womb into the mother if they wanted that, but it also allows for them to do alot more as they dont have to carry a child.
Finally. Pregnancy is the worst turture in the world for women, and the root of all discrimination. I have been supporting artificial wombs since the 90s.
See lady, an artificial womb is not going to give advantages in your life. It will will turn women into more pathetic conditions. Reproduction is the most valuable contribution of a women and if u loose that right, it will reduce your value too. Western men are already done with their women, this technology will allow them to ignore women without any hesitation which will slowly start the countdown for you. If you spend some time on this topic, you vl understand this is a curse.
I would love this option for my daughter w T1 Diabetes because my morning sickness & ability to eat was severely compromised and I was otherwise healthy. So I would not wish for her to be dealing with that while diabetic.
Well, we are doctors, both my wife and me. Both working in paediatrics áreas. I'm surgeon and she's neonatologue. We talk about it since 20 years ago. We where certains that was just a matter of time to see this happening. And now they will justify this with the fluid gender and the claim of equality between women and man. But, in our point of view, once the states feel capable to have new citizens without families, and this new citizens could be, maybe, made ad hoc, I.e. doctors, nurses, soldiers, professors, athletes...., the politics and Wellbeing of the society shall be drew in a more efficient way. Others conclusions can be taken from this situation, and there are our concerns. This level of control about how and were will develop the society, is unknown. How could something like this fits in ours ethics and moral concepts? How our idiosyncrasy will receive this kind of solution? How people that believes in God will receive it? Will the state, any state, have the right to give the authorization or deny it, to someone to have a baby? Yes folks, we are facing an incredible future of amazing and tremendous events. How we will walk through it?
To evolve, one must sometime make a pact with the Devil. The goal will be to open the gate of space and for humanity to separate.
@@kagetsuki23 and so it will be.
Dr. I'm a PA student. Here are my questions for you. Why not invest more in research to solve the actual problems of fertility, pregnancy, childbirth, etc, instead of trying to recreate an entire organ, which is obviously more difficult? There's a lot of research going on for all the other organs, like the heart, lung, kidney. As far as I know, the research in the female reproductive system is far less advanced than in these vital organ systems. And if one day we do have the technology to replicate organs, wouldn't it be used on those vital organs first?
@@dian277 Dear Dian, thank you for your question. It's an honour for me. In my humble opinion, this kind of investigation and research, so expensive and complex, are not focused, in first place, in help common people. The investigation will lead to a more comprehensive path to control all the processes of fertility, pregnancy, as you said, but fertility isn't just now in the main checklist of millionaire's problems. They want to live a lot more, and in good health. So, the point is, how change organs to keep adding years to their lives. They will be capable, in very short term, to inverse the ageing process, but as we have seen in lab results with rats, previous diseases that had already damaged complexes organs cannot be altered. So, the market for organs ad-hoc to transplantation are huge..... We have a lot of methods that can lead to a safe and sure pregnancy, to most of people, even more if you have enough money or you live in Europe, for example. If you live in EEUU or EU, most of time, if to be pregnant is a problem for you, you haven't problems to eat, use a car, have a job or a house. If you need all your energy to work in 3 jobs, can't pay your bills, you will not look for help to have a children, and very probably people in the elite of power will think that you don't need to have a children. The problem here is economic in first place, sociologic in second term, and about control and power in third. Rich people don't want to help people to have more babies, they want to live forever. A lot of luck in your career, is my wish for you. Let me know yours thoughts.
@@newpakaas I think one should also consider that the fertility rates in the developed world are dropping and the governments will eventually want a ready solution for that problem. The ability to create new citizens will be quite tempting.
My mother die the day after I was born! Wish this technology exist back then probably i have a chance to see my mother!
There is gonna be no mom and no women.
@@raptor3853 no Lmao, there will be moms and women
Shut up and take my money!
I can see the benefit of improving the chances of a preterm baby surviving, however beyond that I can't see it being a positive thing at all. The mother-child dynamic/connection during pregnancy would suffer immensely. It's much more than just the physical aspect that happens during pregnancy.
Exactly!
Really appreciate your perspective there re the mother baby connection. If the inutero fluids were replicated and voices, music played and the mother connects immediately after birth (holding infant and breast-feeding) what concerns do you feel would remain (if any)?
@@clairekorte6048 The replication of a large set of known inutero conditions would not guarantee the replication of each and every inutero condition needed for healthy and strong development with a bright future for the baby, since maybe we still don't know each and every such condition needed. But lets suppose we can replicate each and every needed condition, even then I would doubt that the kind of woman who is not willing to carry the baby and develop the baby in her womb would be the same kind of woman that is willing to connect with the baby immediately after birth, giving the baby warmth, quality time, good feelings, caresses, sweet talk to the baby and all the whole motherly lovely package we all know is super good for the emotional and mental development of the baby. I think the kind of woman who does not want to carry the baby in her womb while being herself physiologically capable to do it, would be a cold emotionally distant mother, not a warm nurturing one. Honestly, I would never ever would want to get any such woman pregnant, It would be maybe the worst mistake of my life, poor little baby the one to have an antimother like that. And I do not want a bunch of psychopaths roaming the streets in the next generations that went that bad because their 'mothers' treated them like an annoyance to be grown in a plastic bag away from their chest like fishes in a pet shop.
@@juliocesarsalazargarcia6872 psychopaths as a result of the neglectful single mother epidemic is already a blight on society that were all suffering - developments like these put a check on such abuses of power. ability to have a child ≠ the ability to raise the child
And we don't know how growing in an artificial womb would affect the psyche of a baby, this is an experiment.
Damn...sounds thrilling but at the same time sounds horrifying. Don't know, maybe it will be known once the trials begin...
This technology coming out would be the same process as when in vitro came out.
Some people will freak out, others will welcome it.
The ones that need it will be so happy to have it available.
As long as nobody is pushing anyone into anything against their will, then there should be no sense of loss of viable mothers… they can simply keep having babies the “normal way”, there is nothing to loose and much to gain. Lets just make sure to keep an eye for possible abuse of the industry and that is it ☺️🌻.
I agree I hope kore then anything IVG will will available within the next 5-10 years or 20 none the less like dr sherman silber says it will I feel very sad fir those that cant have they re they're own children naturally or not it's devastating i hope not to argue with anyone just sharing my opinion
Any baby born like this i dont count as human this should be illegal
This is insane...
In a time when everybody wants organically grown food enter artificially grown babies gee what possibly could go wrong? This is creepy on so many levels I honestly hope it doesn't happen.
I personally believe there should be a global referendum on whether or not this research should even continue! (It's impossible to put toothpaste back into the tube once you've squeezed it out).
This research should be discontinued and buried if you ask me.
They are clever scientists- they can find other ways to help the people they want to help! This to me feels like a weapon against mankind. (Men and women!)
Absolutely!! Agree with you!!!
Actually this will help men kind since women don’t want to be mothers and if they do become mothers they choose the a scumbag for a father so Artificial womb is the solution for more smart people
Oohh little minds can't see all the ways this is terrible if you don't want to be a mother that's your problem don't become one. But artificial womb is a whole different ballgame which presents a whole slew of issues little Minds cannot comprehend
@@Gravano104pct do you support feminism?
Interesting, but I don’t see how it helps women in a career sense. I was able to continue working throughout my pregnancy, but the only reason I could get right back to work is because my MIL came to stay with us to take care of my baby while I was working. Once my kid was old enough for daycare, it took my entire salary at the time to pay for daycare!
On another note, this would be helpful for women whose careers would be hurt by pregnancy, or who would have difficulty with pregnancy.
I also think we need to educate people on having fewer children. The world has too many of us already.
Sounds like yet another unethical way to make a huge amounts of money. Disgusting
Do not go into the comments if you want to keep your sanity. You have been warned.
Men will no longer need to women to have kids
i dreamed about this. For me this would be an ideal option. I want to have children, but I don't want to go through pregnancy and a horrible birth, and especially through the consequences that it leaves on a woman's body and psyche. I look forward and hope that women will have this option as a possibility in the future.
I loved carrying my two daughters….could have done without the “morning” sickness though❤️
Child development is so complex proces that is hard to mimic by computer. Also how parents will communicate with child, that is another key problem. It is nice idea that could work on spaceship or space station where control of environment and gravity is necessary.
Make it happen 👍💯 if me as a man want a family it will be great
Indeed these modern women's are worse than any monsters
Ummm there are already options I think? Adoption or Surrogacy?
It has the potential of changing humanity at the most fundamental levels and the technology will be received, used, and missused is terrifying
I'm absolutely terrified by this technology and even more horrified by the amount of people who are in favour of it 😩 It's like no one has ever read a book, ever! Or seen the matrix at least!
WTH is happening?? 🤦🏽♀️
what an interesting subject. No doubt if it's well developed, it'll eventually become a reality. Maybe the discussion is not actually ethical, it's about where this technology is really needed. There's a clear conection developing between parents and the baby while it's growing up, specially with the mother and all that she goes through. I wonder what type of conection would be created without going through this stage of our lives.
Doesn’t the fetus need the vibrations from the mother’s love to grow right?
@@davidfetter728 probably not
@@davidfetter728 no. There's thousands of unwanted children around, to prove It.
@@davidfetter728 Are you insane? No.
@@brumhelldah917 exactly😂
I think it’s an amazing progress in technology and definitely could help a lot of people. I’m no expert, but wouldn’t it be necessary for a human to be inside a real human mother, for example all the chemical changes the mother has gets absorbed by the baby and assist in others it’s development ? Wouldn’t that be essential for it to grow properly? Hearing her voice feeling basically everything the mother does . I think there is still a lot of research to be done I’m sure we will get there and I’m all for new discoveries but messing with the laws of nature, I’m to to positive on that . There has to be more that comes into play . I’m 28 and my mom can literally Sense when something is wrong , there are times we are even thinking the same thing at the exact moment and even studying psychology I have no explanation on how that is .
@smell the air there is no you in 200 years later becuse men dont need dishwashers
Persoannly I hope of anything IVG will be available within thr next 5-10 years or 20 none the less like Dr sherman silber says it will I feel bad for those who cant have they're own children ive seen it alot hopw not to argue with anyone
@smell the air it will available less than 15 years lmfao, when do you think we live now? 1800 lol, its 21 century...
Leave it the natural way
Think Abt mothers who lost their babies due to miscarriage or accidents
@@sakarkolachhapati9793 That is right, and of course thoughts go to them, , but nature still does it best.
@@Greenpoloboy3 no wonder your nickname is GreenpoloBOY
Pregnancy is one of the worst things that could happen to a woman's body in a physiological perspective. A woman sacrifices her health and overall well-being in order to gestate and give birth.
@@softschatz5097 No woman has to have children, but they do, many out of love and desire for children. Just think nature does things the right way. Messing with nature usually has more down sides. Plus I'm not totally against this. If a woman will be affected badly by having a child and chooses to have another way, then ok
I’m much in favour of this idea but only thing worrying me is how can we make this perfect so that it doesn’t end up being a half cooked job because fundamentally in science we cut off many attributes to get to a final outcome. Just think for example agriculture!
Maybe leave the job of childbirth to mothers? Real, live human ones who've been doing a great job of it for thousands of years?!?!
@@neilwheel I wouldn't say they've been doing that great of a job at it no. For most of our history we've incredibly infant and maternal mortality rates which has been mitigated considerably by modern medicine.
btw everyone will have boys
What about all the bacteria normally transferred from mom to child?
Maybe we should try throwing them into waste water
The bacterial transfer happens after child birth, from skin to skin contact and everything.
Yes. Pregnancy is an ordeal. If we can spare women that kind of torture, we must. The ethical questions will resolve themselves with time. They always do.
Then why we need woman ?
@@raptor3853 So original. 😩
@@raptor3853 why do we need men if we have sperm donors?
Exactly
@@raptor3853 seek therapy
Sounds like a good solution for people who are infertile or at high risk for complications. But there are health benefits for the baby that only conventional pregnancy and birth can provide.
Look at another perspective. This won't have the downsides like diabetes, hypertension, smoking, alcohol, medications, premature birth, neonatal hypoxia and MANY others
Baba Vanga predicted this would happen in the next decade.
Gone through the IVF process with my wife. I hated putting her body through that.
If there was a way to not go through that, I would be interested. 🤷🏽♂️ I know she would NOT like it! 😂 she wanted the baby to come from her body.
Not sure how this statement will age though.
Agree
What if there never had to be women again?
Axolotl tanks of the Bene Tleilax in the Dune series.
Let me recommend the works of Lois McMaster Bujold. Let me also suggest some non fiction titles discussing ideas and ethics around this topic: The Means of (Re)Production, Babies in Bottles, and Reproducing the Womb.
Exactly! Lois McMaster Bujold has been writing about for more than 36
years. Begin here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shards_of_Honor
I absolutely loved it, as a woman I wish it happens fast. ❤
Gender fluidity will also increase, we will actually have the power to choose.
Women will Loose power 😃
Exactly right, women are not getting forced to give birth and has the freedom to do everything they want
No one uses pronouns it's just a way for the left to impose their powers, if the right did it the left would be outraged. This sharade is over twitter got exposed it's just an agenda pushed buy bigger powers. In less than 1 year after trump lost and covid started attacks on are constitution's started and it's world wide.
@@priyarajan5748 litterallly the opposite
Idiot
Looks good, sounds good but is it really a good thing to take a natural process away from a species because someone could do it? Just because you can do something doesn’t always mean you should. Please consider all possibilities before you head down a path that never allows you to get back home. 🙏🏻
We're dying out because women want careers instead of babies. Every western country has below replacement level fertility rates.
Coming sooner than you think, but not for the reasons you may think.. 😔
Yeah, the naivety of some folks is staggering! To me this tech is obviously a dark alley to walk down
This is scary. Where are they getting eggs to fertilize? Are women really going to let doctors get their eggs out their body?
Men have X and Y so.....
@@barrontrump3943 yes sperm not the mitochondria dna which is egg
Biologist here Sir
@@nisini3226 stem cells. Why do I have to spell everything out
Isn't it easier to get eggs from body than a whole baby.. if you offer 1000$ , many women will be lining up to sell eggs..
I do not purchase anything from any company that advertises on you tube
I think it's important for a baby to grow inside a human womb. To be with its mother is a comforting and extremely meaningful thing, even on a cellular level, the love that's passed on through hormones, electricity, movement, voice, tummy rubs, and just the fact that the baby knows it's mother is near. And I even think there is sort of a physical telepathy that's going on between mother and baby. Their bodies are communicating with each other and the mother's heartbeat and other bodily functions are teaching the baby how its body should conduct itself. I think it's important for development. I think the child would really know the absence of a human mother in the womb, and it could have negative effects. It's cold hearted that a woman would choose her career and think that that's more important than bonding with her child growing in her womb. And it's only for 9 months! I think it's cold, inhuman and a bit psychopathic, and I don't like what we're becoming. The scientists are just thinking of money 💰🤑
They can make that all artifical way and its be more healty i think your scared into man dont need women
@@raptor3853 Women aren't walking incubations lmao
Also y'all are stupid,its an artificial WOMB,you need both eggs and sperm to create a baby
@@raptor3853 even simple example like music can help baby emotionally, we are not scientist, we dont know much as them, its just simply because they are closed minded and scare to nothing, and plus the technology wasnt meant to the one who have the possibility of getting pregnant anyway.
@@raptor3853yeah bri
People should be working to decrease the birthrate not increase it.
Believe me, they're working on it - have you been asleep for the last two years?
Why? We're literally going extinct with the current fertility rates. Except Africa.
The price to use these should work well in decreasing the population in particular if humans become less fertile.
The moment we no longer have to rely on women is the moment humanity jumps forward.
I have a question. If reproduction can be done entirely in a lab setting, is it possible that humans could be created who are gender neutral? People who are neither male nor female, have no reproductive capability at all? I don't really know why that idea appeals to me, but if I am thinking about it, I cannot possibly be the only person who might find the idea worth consideration.
2% of the population is already born intersex. It's as common to be "gender neutral" at birth as being redhead. Sometimes this affects fertility too
@@Brad14397 Do these people have the Y chromosome?
It's better if they were born females
@@Brad14397 Brad, I don't understand. If they have neither ovaries or testicles how could they possibly reproduce?
i believe it will benefit for women who cant have children and pre-mature baby. It can literally safe life and bring happiness to people. so why not ? Just don't alter this technology into something negative or create a black market for it. That is a big risk on whether humans are ready for it.
It will benefit but well black markets will exist for it, where there's good there's evil also.
This video is pretty disturbing if you come across it while reading Brave New World lol
For those who choose to go through this route to deliver a child it's a reasonable choice.
However I suspect the mother child Bond involving oxytocin serotonin dopamine dimension a few that bonds a mother would have to also be reproduced and given to the mother as well, otherwise you might have situations where a mother going through a regular pregnancy bonds with a child and then there were others who have no bonding whatsoever because of the external wound.
That said I see no reason why that could not be reproduced just as well as a womb.
Scientia Non Domus,
(Knowledge has No Home/
antiguajohn
I will work on this in the future. Hope it will take less than 10 years
I wish you luck👍
I hope so too but more then anything I hope IVG will be available in 5-10 years like dr sherman silber says it will or 20 none the less I feel very sad for those who cant have they're own children Hope not to argue with anyone just sharing my opinion
There will be a time when these people face death for dehumanizing us even further!
God damn , 👀👀👀
I can only imagine the science fiction going to look soon in all this 😅😅
Someone needs to stop people before they are ahead. People are going to loose the value of ourselves over ai and robots. What if it is used for evil then good
Why should a toddler wear a head scarf ❓
Finally men can have children.. just need an egg donor!
No with 2 sprem or artifical egg man can do it
@@raptor3853 2 sperms can’t became baby still need artificial egg to make baby because it has yolk sac in embryo human due to egg
Pearl Jam - Do the Evolution
That is the sound of inevitability, Mr. Anderson. 😎
Mate! 😩😳
i said - tandpoint, this is completely unethical. The primal wound adoptees experience is ignored for what purpose? Babies need biological connections in the womb for proper healthy development. #adopteevoices Then we face separation after birth. The human race is doomed!
What about the people like me who were born without a uterus and have been going through menopause since I was 11 my dreams of ever becoming a mother were squashed when I was 16 when I found out that I would never have a kid of my own what about people like me I understand it could help premature babies and I understand the effects that it might have on a woman who wants to go through pregnancy but what about the people like me who were born without a uterus and have never even given a chance to have a kid of their own that would die for a kid of their own
So do these babies have Birth Certificates? Or ownership certificates? Does the person who breaks the bag "birth" the child? What is the criteria for being the 'parent'? Will that be truth or fiction?
DARPA will patent that technology to generate universal soldiers in the near future - Jason Bourne
This will change human behaviours! So much is gained from the mothers tummy, hormones in particular situations.
Will it change the relationship between mother and baby!
So many questions!
Wow the only thing I can say anything is possible just my opinion will the baby be like a normal baby as if the mother that gives birth I pray one day I can see a baby like this outside the mothers body growing thank you for sharing 💕
It would change humanity for the worse forever... It would stop the maternal changes of the brain in women during the gestational period called the maturing and we would loose a whole would of wmen that had a deeper understanding of love and nurture... because of the lack of these brain reconfigurations. Females would become less maternal and with a lack of a desire and ability to comprehend the importance of family unit... togetherness would eventuality dissipate within humanity creating a sterilization effect. End of humanity.
In the end humans will date AI robots and children that will be created in artificial womb and born half machine (filled with nanobots and an AI chips in their brains) and half human will be the humanity of the future.
We can induce the psychological maternal/paternal changes in the brains for prospecting families to receive these artificially made babies.
@@bjrock1235 reddit moment
@@samisiddiqi5411 How so?
Me: son iam your dad and mother i mean you dont have mother oops i mean i am sole biological parent to u
soon they will be using these to generate electricity. sounds familiar?
Why for when nuclear fusion core have already been reached.
Microverse battery
instead of exploring technologies of prenatal analysis, these guys want to create androids....
WHAT ABOUT BACTERIA!!!!
I'm flagging this video as disturbing! This is nothing to do with helping people.
yall not watch irobot?
Dr Kemp: I think it’s easy to be lead off track by the slightly matrix technology… to be fair I don’t think that’s an accurate representation
BBC employee: what type of background should we use
BBC producer: matrix background of course 0:40
Earth, arguably, has too many humans already on it and people are seriously thinking about moving to another planet. Is there any thought that this technology might be used (hi-jacked) by governments, for instance, to control who is born, and how? This could be wonderful for some people but an absolute horror story for others. My personal view is it's interesting science, but I'm not sure it's of real benefit to mankind. Spinoffs from it might be ....
Fascinating conversation, but I question the long term affects it will have to Humanity and whether or not it is a viable concern to what we need right now as a species. On one hand it would be interesting as it could prove to be invaluable in terms of repopulation to another planet and spread amongst the stars. Or if some great catastrophe happens here on Earth and need to save ourselves from extinction.
Ethical questions then surmise, when one creates a group of Human embryos for repopulation are they then property of said individual? Or the corporation owning said technology? Are they “less” Human for being artificially grown? Would children naturally born become “less” Human as this technology becomes the norm and become the minority?
Fascinating but I question the legitimacy of whether it would serve Humanity in the long run but I am only one Human.
I don't think that children born this way would be classified as property or anything of the sort, In Vitro Fertilization already exists and the children are considered its own independent individual and not a part of the gamete bank that child was choose from, but I do think this type of pregnancy could affect the development of the child, human contact is of extreme importance for the healthy development of a child, and the loss of that contact can literally mean death to an infant, so I think that's the major problem in this type of pregnancy. The loss of contact between the child and mother. It could really hinder the child development.
@@jackyex you raise a fair point about the psychological effect it’ll have between the baby and mother and I agree. But this is entirely different though from vitro fertilization because the process still involves the fertilized egg placed in the womb of a woman afterwords.
I only disagree with you with the fact of looking at how Humans treat of each other by slight differences throughout history. For example ethnic origins, sexuality, religion. Would it not be feasible that someone who is created, developed and born all done artificially in a facility not be seen as less Human by some in society? It is a concerning question. My personal opinion would I treat any baby differently artificially or born naturally? No absolutely not.
@@jordanarnold563 One thing that differentiate this is that probably the way of the pregnancy is not something noticeable, most of the discrimination of humanity comes from noticeable external characteristics, like fisical characteristics or different mannerisms and other social subjects like language, the pregnancy for the most part would be something unnoticeable, people born premature for the most part are no different from someone who was born on time, and well the same argument about someone born from IVF could be made to this, they could be "less human" as their start was not from natural conditions, being more similar to a bacterial culture, anyway, the basis of discrimination are the differences, and differences are very malleable, for example some countries are much more accustomed with people of mixed race and their society don't discriminate against them because they are considered normal, while in some other countries mixed race people are seen as different and taboo so they are discriminated against, but if the mixed race person physically looks like the majority ethnicity of that country that mixed individual would not be discriminated against, if someone born from this "In Vitro pregnancy" has no development issues and acts like the rest of the populace they would not be discriminated against.
Don't do it!! Child bearing people do not have enough respect in this world as it is. And you know what is done to those deemed unneeded or "problematic".
What about the constant nerve and cellular level communication that goes on between mother and forming baby, like stem cells creation etc how can that happen in an artificial womb? I think at most the baby could be removed at 5-6 months to be placed in artificial womb, after initial formation is done. This would be low risk surgery than childbirth
Quo vadis mundus?
this makes me think of TV dinners, Velveeta and flying cars. Progress to the future! Sure, sure.
Why? They can already grow an embryo days in a glass tube, even manage to fully grown a fetus to baby in an artificial bag...Will take another couple of years sure...but we are getting there. Are you Catholic? 🤣
You are a bit right sadly, we have overestimated future technological progress many times
But oh well, time will tell
This is amazing!
No need to worry about the wife using your children as hostages in divorce courts if men are able to raise their own children without the gold miner destroying their lives.
It will end any quality I’m sure it will be highly accessible and not extremely expensive
Woww
As a species, we are no where near grown up enough to apply this technology's usage responsibly.
Disagree
I was thinking the same thing .
*Divorce court exists to the detriment of men*
We are long overdue for a correction.
@@dansmith1661 maybe men should be better mates so that women won’t divorce them. Not all men deserve to be divorced but most do because they end up being children women have to pick up after and care for.
@@ladybug3380 Maybe women shouldn't gold mine men and actually show loyalty now that they hit the wall.
Matrix feeling right here...