Hyundai IONIQ 6 Has A Huge Range Improvement Over IONIQ 5! 70-MPH Highway Range Test (AWD Limited)
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- Ryan takes the Hyundai Ioniq 6 in Limited trim on our 70 mph range test. The Ioniq 6 claims great range and efficiency. Watch to find out if it lives up to expectations!
Shoutout to our sponsors:
- Nokian Tyre: To find the solution to your tire needs go to www.nokiantires.com/EV
- Magna: For hiring opportunities and techinilogical innovations visit www.magna.com
We would really appreciate it if you subscribe to our channel! The more subscribers we have, the more awesome opportunities we will be able to bring to you!
Find all of our Amazon must-haves here:
www.amazon.com/shop/influence...
Kyle on Twitter: @itskyleconner
Kyle on Instagram: @Virtualkyle
For more behind the scenes content:
Twitter: @Out_of_Spec
Facebook: / outofspecreviews
Instagram: @OutofSpecReviews
Inquiries: info@outofspecstudios.com
Tesla Referral Code: www.tesla.com/referral/kyle92049
TeslaFI Referral: www.teslafi.com/signup.php?re...
0:00 Intro
0:53 Overview
2:28 Testing procedures
5:35 Range test
14:24 Final result
14:47 Data
If you liked this video, we recommend checking out some of our other channels!
Out of Spec Motoring: / outofspecmotoring
Out of Spec Reviews: / outofspecreviews
#hyundai #ioniq6 #range - Auta a dopravní prostředky
It's frustrating as a shopper when they force the big wheels on you with the top trims. Like maybe I want extra features without taking a significant range hit.
just change the wheels...
Couldn't agree more, I have a RWD SEL Ioniq 6 and would love to have the 18" wheels for the greater range. 305 isn't bad but 360 is clearly better.
I'm sure if the dealer had any extra inventory, they would swap out your 20" wheels/tires for some 18" wheels from inventory. Selling a lower trim level car with higher trim level wheels is quite easy to do.
My friend & I factory ordered the Ionic 5 ultimate trim with 19” wheels in Canada but when the car arrived, they said it wasn’t available.
They offered there demo Ionic 19” wheels with 10,000 kms on them at no charge but that was their only fix.
How does wheel size impact range?
Great test! 12000 miles in a SE AWD I6 with 18" wheels and I am averaging 4.4 miles/kWh. It's probably 10-15% more efficient than the versions with 20" wheels. Nice car and a really comfortable cruiser with tons of interior room but a little lacking in cargo space.
Nice. If I had to buy a car today the Ioniq 6 would be my choice.
That's pretty good. What's your driving mix? Mostly highway, back roads, city? Have you been through a winter yet? If so, does it get cold where you are?
@@patrickshelley09 Beautiful BC Canada here. 70-30 mix of highway/city with lots of mountain passes which makes the highways a little slower though I am not a slow driver. No I6 has seen a winter yet outside of SK, unless you count down-under. We got ours in April. We can get very cold here with a few weeks of -20c and a fair bit of snow. Looking forward to it!
@@tomm5936 Same here, and I have an eight year old ICE Nissan that is about ready to be replaced. However, with the coming switch by Hyundai to NACS, I'm sorely tempted to wait until that change is available.
270+real world miles at decent hwy speeds using just over 2 gallons worth of gas in total energy. 😎
Can we all just appreciate how far evs have come in such a short time? Imo the Koreans are the only real near peer competition right now for tesla. They need to get their U.S. plants building these at profitable scale and eligible for those tax incentives asap! 👍🏻
Can't wait to see you guys test an ev9! And maybe next year the ex30 and ev5?
Man - *if* the Ioniq 6 had a hatch/lift back (like the Tesla S and the ID.7) - it would be a wonderful choice for me and my family.
The trunk remains pretty spatious though. I have a trunk organizer in pushed in the back of it, and I still can put much luggage and some bags. The under-trunk is a bit small, but mainly because it’s a styrofoam box that itself takes most of the space. I have to find a way to replace that with something thiner (maybe yoga-mats glued down).
In the RWD in the EU-version, the frunk is decent enough to put your groceries (even though there is no keyfob button to open it, you still have to use the classic hood handle in the drivers dood opening, like ICE cars), but in the AWD (or the US-RWD), it’s nearly useless: I have a Lv2 cable in it and that’s all. There are aftermarket parts to change that in the US (I’m in the EU).
The no-hatchback situation can be a bummer for some persons, but not for me. The rear seats can still fold down and create a lot of depth, thank to the back seats having that incredible leg space.
@@timovneerden sure, but you can't fit any number of things into it. For me, there's no substitute for a hatch door.
@@NeilBlanchardI leaned this when I had an old Dodge Shadow and was able to close the hatch with a full sized dryer in the back. After having laughed at me when I pulled up in the Shadow, the guy I bought the dryer from couldn't believe his eyes when I drove away.
@@CRuM770 Exactly - I had a 1987 Golf - and carried a 5' high chest of drawers - with the hatch closed.
@@NeilBlanchard I now have a 17 Volt and still love the hatch. It doesn't hold as much as the Shadow, but it's carried its fair share of building supplies.
I've been watching your 70mph range videos a long time. I really appreciate the addition of the bar chart at the end to put it in context with other tested vehicles. It is good to see how it compares to other vehicles you may be looking at as alternatives. This will be a great tool as more and more EVs come into the market.
Nobody beats Bjorn for data gathering and presentation though. Shame no one in the U.S. does it.
Just got this car 2 days ago and some of that choice is because of your reviews and feedback so thank you! I'm in CO too so that is nice to see the infamous I-25 footage as you do the reviews! Good content and thanks!
3.7 mi/kWh is terrific, anything over 225 miles of highway range is exceptional.
Please do a range test for the RWD sel version please!
Gotta run the RWD long range base model
Love the end of video analysis!!! Putting it in context with competitors and environmental conditions, that’s a great move.
We have a lot of great data, and it’s all from the real world. Context is important!
Well-done test. 3.7 mi/kWh at highway speed is wild on those wheels. So cool to see the data viz at the end; great addition for these and appreciate your thoroughness!
I would like to see the test with the RWD Long range with the smaller wheels. Our Ioniq 5 also does better than EPA estimates, 2 weeks ago we drove 201 miles non stop and still had 28% battery left with 76 miles left. But it was mixed freeway and back road highways so less then 70mph average. The I6 is a nice car but I would rather have the extra room in our I5 over a few miles of extra range, in 18k miles haven't come close to running out of battery yet.
Test the long range RWD next
While understand being disappointed at not getting 300 miles this is still a much better result then I've seen in many other reviews, I mean Car and Driver only got 260 mile range on the base rear wheel drive model, but that was testing at 75 mph.
I guess this shows how much the efficiency can drop off a cliff by just going somewhat faster, and taking it easier on this car is probably the way to go. Though smaller wheels probably would help too.
Nice Tableau comparison at the end with testing details!
Well done video -- like others said, the bar graph at the end is helpful and appreciated.
You are really developing your presenting skills. Keep up the good work!
Thank you!
@@ryankassel5691 I'm really appreciating all the hard work you're doing! You're improving with the information flow to the viewers, but just keep in mind those verbal fillers of uhhs and umms. You're rocking on camera and I look forward to all your content!
Finally some comparison charts! Thank you! Would be helpful to have the model year shown.
Like the data at the end and a brief discussion of its range within its class.
I get 270 miles at around 80%, so Hyundai is VERY conservative in its ratings. Loving the car, but trip to IKEA challenging. I fit everything I needed, but I would like more cargo space.
Can't wait to see where the new updated Polestar(s) end up on the list!
Good video Ryan. Love the graphed data from other tests.
Cool vid. Watched it all & enjoyed. Thx.
My AWD got 302 miles at 100 kph with the aircon on and going down 2000 feet and back up at 25 deg C. Last week.
Usually gets between 285 and 300 miles. Will probably get 320 miles on flat roads at 100kph.
Hope this helps.
Nice job and thank you for the data share
Thank you for the test. I'm considering buying one but have a trip from Sacramento to my family in Loveland planned in August and I have to admit I'm a little anxious about the rout and stops.
Great test! Thanks for doing it
Love the tool Ryan, maybe in time with enough cars/trucks you can compare segments such as only cars or only suv etc . Thanks for posting
Using Tableau to show the data. Love it!
I've been driving the I6 SEL AWD for a week now with 20" wheels and have been getting 4.2 miles/kwh because I'm rarely on the highway.
Whenver I finally need to replace the tires I might go down a size but so far this is more than fine.
Hi OOS. Do you know if this test was done with I Pedal mode engaged? In that mode, the car is "locked" in AWD, even in Eco mode. I am trying to understand the real world range difference between AWD and RWD efficiency for E-GMP cars, and if AWD can be very close to RWD efficiency in certain modes. Thanks for all the awesome content.
As you are a M3 owner. I would love a complete head to head comparison to the Ioniq 6.
Great review, Tks.
The only thing missing is , by the end, show how long it takes to charge to 80% and to charge to 100%... That information is critical for us looking at EVs and trying to decide if its the time to jump into it or not.
I saw a Canadian man test his ionic 6 limited with the fast EV 18-in wheels and continental low rolling resistance tires and he got a pretty significant efficiency improvements. So the handicap from the '20s is huge. If I keep my least IONIQ I'm buying 18-in wheels for it.
You should try the smaller wheels also to see the difference
I just did a 70mph test in my Niro EV - if I went from 100 to zero it could have done 293 miles. It was saying 4.5mi/kwh in the dash. Two caveats with this - I didn't need any a/c that day (but it was doing defogging when needed), and I had a 7mph tailwind.
So I guess if you want to not bother with getting dumb large tire sizes, the Kona or Niro is the way to go.
Depending on the trim level, there is even a place for a spare tire. You will have to buy one, but the well is there.
Edmunds has a running list that they do on a track with varying speeds. The 2022 Kona matches the model 3 standard range for efficiency at 23 kWh/ 100 mi.
The EPA estimates are 28 and 24 respectively.
The Niro comes in at 25.6.
The only cars that have done better in their tests are the 2020 Ionic and Cooper. Both small cars with small and light batteries.
The standout in the tests in my eyes is the Model Y long range. It comes in at 26.2. Basically matching the RWD EV6 wind.
The most surprising thing to me was that the Rivian is less efficient than the Lightning.
Good job Ryan!
Ryan, we shouldn't lament the fact that this "least efficient" configuration of the Ionic 6 only got 280 miles of range in your test. Instead, we should be glad that this vehicle would be a great road tripper, due to its fantastic charging curve. In that regard, it is very similar to the Porsche Taycan with it's shorter range, but great charging curve. I wonder how the Ionic 6 would perform in the cannonball (hint, hint 😀).
Under ideal conditions it has some of the best charging we’ve tested! They still need to work on battery preconditioning, especially for winter. Unfortunately our current infrastructure isn’t sufficient to really maximize the Ioniq 6. Hopefully that will change in the near future.
@@ryankassel5691 True enough, but Hyundai will get all that worked out (pre-conditioning, infrastructure issues, etc). I'm not worried about that. Fact is, this is a good start for them. It should only get getter from here on out.
@@ryankassel5691 will you be doing the 10% challenge. If the battery is warm when you start you should get a really good result, maybe near Taycan result? I have seen videos where people get over 250kw for several minutes in Ioniq 5. Apparently a software upgrade earlier this year boosted the max charge rate. The Ioniq 6 should have this software too.
I have been impressed with the efficiency of our Ioniq5 when driving our local mountain highways in southwest Colorado. I suspect it mostly has to do with lower speeds but the smaller wheels and tires must help too. We’ve averaged 4.2 miles/kWh after over 20,000 miles of driving.
Does eco disconnect the front motor? I thought you had to use that my drive mode setting to keep it disconnected
OK, as an IONIQ5 owner I will ask -- what about the RWD option on the larger battery? That's what will matter for range-oriented buyers.
Ioniq 6 RWD SE on 18” wheels is rated for 361 miles. We already saw the rated 279 miles for the AWD Limited was pessimistic. I suspect the 361 figure is a bit optimistic, it’s hard to believe the 91 mile difference considering the AWD has a front clutch disconnect for efficiency.
@@ryankassel5691The EPA is in normal mode, where AWD is engaged at certain times, and if you drive in one pedal mode it's always on, regardless of driving mode. So depending on your style of driving, regen preferences, etc 25% difference between the AWD and RWD models may actually be realistic.
When I was car shopping I really liked the Ioniq 6 but knowing what is coming down the pipeline I could not bring myself to buy it and wanted to lease it but the lease monthly was so high that buying a model Y was cheaper.
I wad waiting for this one. I've noticed huge improvements with the 18 inch wheels. The SE is the best bang for your buck if you can live without the extra space and the tech lost.
I have the SEL and put 18" wheels on it. 370 miles on a full charge now! A lot of freeway driving.
Can you guys offer a link to the test file you shared at the end of the video? It would be interesting to study on my own.
so no HUD for limited trim in the US version?
Is that range spreadsheet online somewhere we can access?
Is there a spreadsheet with range test data on all the evs you've tested?
Ryan, great job and really love your bar graphs at end. My take-away is if you don’t need AWD (live in a warm climate) and want max range, go for rear wheel drive and 18” wheels. It may not look best and handle as well as this model, but you will get efficiency & range.
If you can, I'd really like to see that test and comparisson with the Ionic 6 RWD with 18 inch. wheel. I'd really like to know how much real Miles/Km range it gets and the efficiency, especially compared to the Model 3. Thanks for the video!!!
Rivian R1T Dual Motor Standard and Max Pack range test soon please!
Would turning the AC off add another 5% range?
excellent real world test well presented and driven . the Ioniq 6 is much better looking in the flesh . our local dealer in Beja has one on test .
Such a coincidence, I've just came back from the Hyundai dealership to look at the Ioniq 6 and now suddenly out of spec uploaded
any markup on it in your area?
Can u do a range test on a VW id4 pro s rwd doesn’t look like it’s on your list
That's great hyundai estimates 270. So it beat this. Can you guys put the model year with the vehicle names so if there is a refresh of a vehicle we can know which version has been tested?
This is exactly why i recommend it over the 5!
Were you driving with ipedal?
Any plans to test the long range trim of the car?
the width of the tires probably has a lot to do with the range hit from the 20" wheels too. They are much wider than the 18" wheels. So it's not just diameter/weight. The wider tires would give a much more stable road feel with better performance, grip, braking, acceleration, etc. My guess is Hyundai wants to force the 20" performance wheel/tire combo into as many builds as possible in the first model year so that reviewers always get a high-performing vehicle. Later on, they will make the smaller diameter/width wheels and tires more available on other trims, once the initial "impression" has been made. Visually, the same goes. Most of the early cars have the big sparkly 20" rims, making people take notice. Later on, they'll allow more builds with the "uglier" small wheels. Personally, i think this is a stupid strategy since it turns people away from the car who care about range. But it gets really good range anyway, despite the wheels, so Hyundai doesn't really lose all that much. Most people don't dive into the specs like many early-adopters and internet EV enthusiasts. But the range hit with the 20" wheels is quite significant, and enough to turn away a few buyers, some of whom might be frustrated with their trim level decisions and not come back to the brand. Personally I'd be concerned about that, if I was in charge at Hyundai, but im not so.....
Their strategy varies from market to market, for example in our market 18" wheels are available for all trim levels from the start of sales.
Great, thanks. It’s time for a seven minute video, comparing all of the vehicles that you guys have tested in this manner in a chart format.(lol. I wrote this before the end)😊
I don’t think 7 minutes is possible but yes, we should recap all of our tests up to this point!
@@KyleConnerI don’t see the model S on there either
@@rvboondocker2559I didn’t include full size executive sedans like the EQS or the Model S. The Lucid Air is definitely bordering on that size, though!
Don’t be lazy
I would prefer removal of the lucid in the future. It's big range bar makes it harder to see the difference between the rest since it squishes everything. Put that one with the likes of the eqs and model s.
Also, as a data scientist, it's definitely not lazy to trim down your visuals to make them easier to digest. Such things usually take more effort than just tossing everything in.
So 280 miles to 0, more like 260 before you would want to charge, then you can only charge to 80 at resonable speeds so every leg of trip after the first loses 30%. That puts it about 195 miles. This is getting pretty close to my dream of 3 hours of highway driving in 15 minutes of charging. Here's hoping the 2025 or 2026 EV models will hit that target.
The SE (smaller wheels) with rwd may be there already.
The comparison with the model 3 at the end mentions the Model 3 is sportier sure but the Ioniq 6 is a half class larger.
He was talking about the M3 Performance which is NOT the rival of the Ioniq 6 AWD. The M3 Long Range AWD is, but it looks like there is no interest to make a matchup between the two. 3.7 mi/kWh @ 70 mph is not enough. Even with 10% improvement on 18" wheels is not enough.
@@voldar70 it is over 10%
I've been waiting for a real test of this car.
Charging curve next?
It has the same charging curve as the Ionia 5, EV6, GV60, etc.
If this had a set of 18" wheels and the new Hankook Ion Evo AS tires, I truly believe 300 miles at 70mph would be within reach. I'm seeing right at 250 miles of interstate range now on my EV6 GT after swapping out the 21" wheels for a set of lightweight 19s with a set of Hankook Ion Evo AS SUV tires. In other words, its able to go just as far as our Model Y LR AWD which is rated at a claimed 330 mile range.
If it’s the infinity sound system that slaps
Thank You for All that you are doing for our Planet Earth.... Peace.. Shalom.. Salam.. Namaste 🙏🏻 😊 🌈 ✌ ☮ ❤
Naturally, It ran completely past the Ioniq 5. Putting 18s back on should scrape up even more. I'm really annoyed at manufacturers for putting clown wheels on everything. Not every car needs 22s.
The marketing droids that make the call on packaging don't daily drive or road trip these cars.
Would you be able to share the spreadsheet through google sheets or some other way?
We’ll have it soon!
Can you add the range document to these videos?
In the works!
In my EV6 GT 3.7 at 80mph is normal in normal mode on highway. Range is over 230 miles without running battery down last 5%. The WHOLE key for owning an EV is the ability to have a level 2 charger in your own garage. So this leaves out most apartment renters. And even here in vegas most commercial charging stations have very poor network of actually working DC fast chargers. Even a commercial fast charger takes around 20-30 minutes to charge. Who wants to bake out in the 120 degree sun while outside charging car? Not me. Not practical. If you don’t have a level 2 in your garage you will end up hating the car because you can’t charge the thing.
The long range Tesla model 3 hasn’t been tested?
It also has a price increase when it was already grossly overpriced.
great, now try the rear wheel drive with the small wheels - it will be even better
Actually someone should measure the efficiency of the standard range 54 kWh Ioniq 6, it has a lighter battery and a smaller engine and is probably one of the very best right now (after my 2018 Ioniq off course)
Do ioniq 6 SE RWD
How come? They claim almost 370 miles on a charge, it is a huge difference with reality though
1:03 Electric Global Modular Platform platform
🤦♂️
@@ryankassel5691 It's okay. Everyone does it. Redundant acronyms are just one of those things that my brain picks up on. 😅 PIN number, ATM machine...
The test needs to be repeated at least a couple of more times. Once night, preferably when it's raining and again in cooler\cold weather.
Range is alway better when temps are at 20c but what does aircon\heating, having the lights and\or wipers on or if the outside temp is only 10c do to the range
They are still using British measuring units in their country
What everyone seems to overlook and that affects performance more than any other factor is WEIGHT. EV’s are heavy as an army tank my GT6 is damn 5000 pounds with me aboard. It’s massive weight that kills range. The technology needs to be where the battery pack weighs 100 pounds not a half ton. Worrying about wheel width is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
What’s the point of running it as close to 0% charge as you can? Wouldn’t the test be as useful if you ran it down too 10% to avoid any drama?
10% can mean very different things in different cars. They also have different behaviors at low states of charge. Some seem to run out quickly while others seem to last forever, some have big buffers while others have none. Going from 100-0 provides us with the full capability of the car, and it allows us to directly compare the ranges on different vehicles.
@@ryankassel5691 have you found most people run their EV’s down to zero?
@@Bum_Hip there’s definitely a spectrum. It’s hard to speak for most people, but I would expect targeting 10-20% arrival is pretty typical. There are still a lot of people who will run it lower. Batteries charge faster at lower states of charge, so there’s a benefit to running it low on road trips.
Improved range is the least it can offer given its absolute joke of a trunk.
280 miles with 104%, that means 190 miles with 70%. It takes 20 minutes to recharge 70%. That means it charges at an average of 570mph when driving 70mph. The RWD with smaller wheels should crack the 600mph mark. Any other EVs out there that can do this? I don't think so, and the average charging speed for a 70% charge (i.e. 10-80% for this car, or 0-70% for Tesla) in mph is the only relevant metric for long distance trips, at least when comparing with cars of similar range. The Lucid Air also charges slower than the Ioniq 6, but its range advantage compensates for that. Alternatively you could only charge 200 miles at a time with the Lucid, and then it should be able to keep up or outcharge the ioniq 6. But then, the Lucid doesn't really matter, does it?
The big question in the US is… how reliably can you pull those charging speeds from EA or EVgo chargers? You would have trouble finding an available and working 350 kW charger at every stop.
I was curious how Model 3 RWD compared, so I ran the numbers. Even though it’s not known for its high speed charging, it’s very efficient and has a decent charging curve. It charges at 504 mph if driving 70 mph and charging 10-60% (264*.955*.5 * 60/15), or 407 mph if charging 10-80% (264*.955*.7 * 60/26).
@@GraysonCarr I don't know the US Model 3. It's differnt from the European version in some ways and certainly has a different battery. I don't think the European M3 in any configuration would take a worth the while longer or shorter time to cross Europe than the Ioniq 6.
However, there are far, far more high power public chargers and charging sites than Superchargers in Europe, and the Hyundai route planner and sat nav works better in its current form than Teslas. So this might be slightly more convenient than a Model 3 and certainly a lot more comfortable and less noisy.
As for the US I understand that public charging is lacking, similar to Australia or somewhat less in the UK, too. And I assume the charging issues will vary greatly in different states and communities. But that's all hear-say, it's over 20 years since I last was in the US, so I don't know anything about anything.
The reality is, an EV isn't a petrol car, it has completely different advantages and disadvantages, and you will have to allow for that in your habits. If you try to replicate the petrol car owner experience with an EV, it will not work in any case, but a Tesla maybe comes closest. If you treat it like a blank page, with no particular expectations, you will quickly learn that EVs are actually great cars, better than petrol cars in almost every imaginable way, and that every coin has two faces, even the fact that EVs won't get you as far as quickly as a petrol car.
Did you actually track what you put into the cars or just what their display says? Tesla claims unrealistic efficiency on the display - off by 25% in my experience. Hyundai is pretty accurate.
Yep 20% better EPA mpge highway rating!
Can you not add kilometres and kilometres/h so that we from Europe understand what you are talking about. Just add in some text in the video. Keep up the good work!
When 10% challenge?
why not 80mph?
Panda pandah phanda phandah paanda pandaah panda
The word Limited does not mean fully loaded
110 km/h range test
The looks really grows on yah. I'd smoke the rear lights to complete the uniform Black and silver look. Do I dare say it's a budget Porsche?🤔
Wow, it's almost like aerodynamics matter. Who coulda guessed that suv's suck when the speed increases?
/sarcasm
Hmm. Yeah I'm calling BS on the long range RWD being able to do 361 miles. Atleast on this test.
The car would need to hit an efficiency of 4.7 to do that. At 70mph I don't think there's a car on the market that can hit that.
I really wish manufacturers cut the single EPA stated range and instead gave us efficiency numbers. Like "x car has 80kwh battery. gets 5m/kwh at 55mph. 4m/kwh at 70mph. 3.5m/kwh at 80mph." Or some shit like that. Or just make it a linear graph showing the speed on the x axis and efficiency on the y.
I also think the 361 mile figure is optimistic. We’ll get one in for testing sometime soon!
The Model 3 RWD got 4.4 mi/kWh on this same 70 mph test (264 mi / 60 kWh), which isn’t that far from 4.7. Certain trims of Lucid Air and Ioniq 6 are supposed to be more efficient than Model 3 RWD, but whether they are in reality, I don’t know.
I know this car has an excellent low drag coefficient but damn is it ugly.
The 5 looks cool. This doesn't.
You would be crazy to buy this car over the Tesla Model 3. For price and technology you just cannot beat the Tesla. Honestly, if you drove the Tesla and then this car it would be going back in time 6 years!
Pedantry: saying “E-GMP Platform” decodes to saying “Electric Global Modular Platform Platform”
If you’d like to stop sounding like you don’t know what the P in e-gmp stands for you can refer to it as an ‘Architecture’.
Just say “E-GMP Architecture” it’s easy and you sound more like you actually know what the acronym means instead of coming across like an airheaded presenter just reading a script containing words they don’t understand.
Shut up, it’s a dumb acronym and only the most insufferable would care.
He only got 254mil he never get 300miles and he said at the being it fully charge at 254miles
When he started it said 254 mi but it also said 30 mi already driven
It’s just so ugly though
That is one person’s opinion. I like the Ioniq 6’s looks.
Taste is relative and intelligence to understand that is rare
@@outbackigloo6489yeah I like it too and I own a Tesla I like that too
If it wasn’t so hideous…