Conversations With History: Tariq Ali Pakistan

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 06. 2024
  • Host Harry Kreisler welcomes writer and journalist Tariq Ali for a discussion of Pakistan and its relations with the United States. He places the present crisis in its historical context exploring the origins of the Pakistani state, the failure to forge a national identity, the inability and unwillingness of Pakistani leaders to address the country's poverty and inequality, and the role of the military in the country's spiral toward violence and disunity. Tariq Ali highlights the significance of the U.S. relationship throughout Pakistan's history and analyzes current US policy and its implications for stability in the region. [11/2008] [Show ID: 15414]
    More from: Conversations with History
    (www.uctv.tv/cwh)
    Explore More Public Affairs & Politics on UCTV
    (www.uctv.tv/public-affairs)
    Public Affairs UCTV goes beyond the headlines to explore economics, public policy, race, immigration, health policy and more. Hear directly from the researchers so you can be informed to make important decisions.
    UCTV is the broadcast and online media platform of the University of California, featuring programming from its ten campuses, three national labs and affiliated research institutions. UCTV explores a broad spectrum of subjects for a general audience, including science, health and medicine, public affairs, humanities, arts and music, business, education, and agriculture. Launched in January 2000, UCTV embraces the core missions of the University of California -- teaching, research, and public service - by providing quality, in-depth television far beyond the campus borders to inquisitive viewers around the world.
    (www.uctv.tv)

Komentáře • 244

  • @laylakhalid630
    @laylakhalid630 Před 10 lety +108

    This man is brilliant. Great insight into Pakistan's past and how its affecting its present

  • @carlosorellana5154
    @carlosorellana5154 Před 2 lety +18

    I am watching on 31 Aug 2021, as USA is leaving Afghanistan after 20 year war. This guy, Tariq Ali is here predicting and explaining what has now happened. AMAZING!!!!

    • @usmanazam4662
      @usmanazam4662 Před 2 lety +2

      💯 He is the epitome of intellect among Pks and here I am discovering him in December 2021.

    • @francoisehembert3243
      @francoisehembert3243 Před 2 lety +1

      Watching on December 31, 2021.

    • @electakhan8334
      @electakhan8334 Před 2 lety

      As I watched it now, it really has happened! Apr 19th 22)

  • @javaidiqbal2149
    @javaidiqbal2149 Před 3 lety +8

    Tariq Ali is a honest intellectual of a rare breed

  • @shankarcg786
    @shankarcg786 Před 5 lety +14

    After many years I heard a true Pakistani speaking the truth

  • @s80key
    @s80key Před 8 lety +52

    Love his voice

    • @PSkeepitcool
      @PSkeepitcool Před 5 lety +1

      Do u think Pakistan should join Hindustan? And be bigger than USA?

    • @Makrania
      @Makrania Před 3 lety

      @@PSkeepitcool The European Union model for re-integration is much more beneficial and less destructive. Otherwise, the end of any state in the future would be destructive for everyone in the neighborhood. Consider what has happened in the aftermath of the USSR and Yugoslavia! Incidentally, the end of the British Empire in India was very destructive as well. The end of any state is not usually very pretty.

    • @Makrania
      @Makrania Před 3 lety +3

      Imagine if all people in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan would have access to the type of education that Tariq Ali and others had!

    • @matthewwhitton5720
      @matthewwhitton5720 Před 2 lety +1

      The Carter regime essentially gave birth to Salafi - Jihadi madness. And under AQs aidis, they certainly came back, stealthily and with an extraordinary zeal, to savagely bite the hand that both created and fed them.

  • @LoLzZ85
    @LoLzZ85 Před 10 lety +23

    Love listening to this guy speak

  • @thamilvanandr
    @thamilvanandr Před 7 lety +29

    this conversation help me to understand the present (2016) situation

  • @qa7103
    @qa7103 Před 11 měsíci +3

    Watching this in July, 2023. Listening to this guy drives home a real sense of hopelessness vi's a vi's Pakistan's future prospects. Pakistan Discovery's Shahzad had him on his podcast which is equally intriguing.

  • @YogeshKrNegi
    @YogeshKrNegi Před 5 lety +6

    A great great talk. Quite an intellectual inquiry.

  • @LalitKumar-cu5iu
    @LalitKumar-cu5iu Před 5 lety +72

    Indian prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri in the 1960s didn't let his family freely use official cars, so they asked him to purchase one.
    He took financing from the panjab national bank and purchased a fiat for his family.
    He died a year later in Tashkent where he had gone to sign indo-pak truce document.
    His wife paid off the car loan from her family pension.
    Such integrity shines all the more in the shadow of the politicians of today who are motivated by power and money rather than a sense of service and vision.
    The conduct of the congress party of India today makes me sick, and they can almost beat the pakistani leaders on metrics of indifference, shamelessness, corruption, and poor conduct.

    • @aatmaDipoBhava
      @aatmaDipoBhava Před 5 lety +1

      Good job.... In 2018.

    • @mushman6045
      @mushman6045 Před 5 lety +3

      Lalit Kumar the problem is simple. Good people don't usually go into politics , bad people who are money and power hungry do

    • @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz
      @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz Před 5 lety +1

      @Aditya Sanjeev.....hahahahaha... No... He is a hatemonger... Bloody idiot...

    • @Aashu299
      @Aashu299 Před 5 lety +1

      @Aditya Sanjeev These casteist wolves are the reason why UP and Bihar is backward.

    • @Aashu299
      @Aashu299 Před 5 lety +2

      @Aditya Sanjeev I too will vote for Modi in 2019 just like I did in 2014.

  • @SanjeevDD
    @SanjeevDD Před 5 lety +8

    Mr Tariq Ali should be at the forefront thinkers during discussions on Pakistan

  • @shankysays
    @shankysays Před 5 lety +4

    He is a very powerful speaker. Such eloquency and fact driven statements.

  • @SupratimBhowmick
    @SupratimBhowmick Před 5 lety +5

    I can listen to him for hours.

  • @getevennow
    @getevennow Před 2 lety +2

    Tariq Ali is unquestionably one to the most brilliant Pakistanis of his generation. He. is close to what Noam Chomsky Is the USA. What we need to recall is Indira Gandhi is reported to advised Bhutto at Simla, after the signing of the peace agreement. She as a fellow politician advised ZAB that he had the historic opportunity to firmly cork up the then defeated humiliated Pakistani generals in the bottle for all time to come. And, if he failed to dothat, they would, in time "eat up his Country ".

  • @quamrulsiddiqui4225
    @quamrulsiddiqui4225 Před 5 lety +53

    Judaism changed itself to secular understanding. Jews took part into industrial Revolution. Not a single Muslim country did that. Pakistan is quite far from that. Mr. Bhutto himself was a feudal man. Secularism is not a question of declaration but struggle.When a leader does not have philosophical depth then out come is inevitable. Thank you.

    • @LalitKumar-cu5iu
      @LalitKumar-cu5iu Před 5 lety

      Who is that pakistani leader who had philosophical depth ?
      There must have been a few over the last 70 years.

    • @grc178
      @grc178 Před 5 lety +5

      Don't know whether u r indian or pakistani. But a cool breeze it is to see Muslims started thinking intellectually. Hosh better than josh.
      Hinduism, Jainism, buddhism are spiritual religions
      Whereas
      Judaism, Christianity n islam are sort of political religions
      That's the basic reason why these three power greedies could never coexisted peacefully for long when opportunity to revolt existed.
      At least Christian n Jews became bit atheist n started getting fruits of LIFE rather than dreaming of 72 hurs in jannat.
      Unfortunately Muslims don't understand it in their rare of rarest dreams
      That's why they are exploited by west
      Yesterday's books of any religion won't help u in today's masail of life
      Love from India

    • @soheil527
      @soheil527 Před 3 lety

      Rubbish. never heard of malaysia and turkey. india still buys weapons from outside. so much for secularism

    • @pkmkb_0
      @pkmkb_0 Před 2 lety

      @@soheil527 ill say this mentality of comparison with india in every situation especially in military area from 1947 got them at this position. u mentioned turkey, Malaysia both are islamic countries like pak means pak also don't need to think about religion and they could have focus towards other things like what Malaysia and turkey did.
      -u said abt weapons 🤦🏻‍♂️ india got indigenous aircraft carrier
      don't need to say other things..

    • @rottenapple6531
      @rottenapple6531 Před 2 lety +3

      @@grc178 What? Christians, Jews, and Muslims have lived peacefully amny times in history? Where do you learn your facts from? Sure there were times of war but there was also times the Abrahamic faiths coexisted

  • @jubleehunzai999
    @jubleehunzai999 Před 2 lety +2

    Brilliant talks

  • @maheshkumarhanj5553
    @maheshkumarhanj5553 Před 5 lety +6

    Lot to understand and learn from Mr Tariq Ali.

  • @kamalpreetsingh1686
    @kamalpreetsingh1686 Před 3 lety +2

    Tariq Ali is great intellectual in our era.....

  • @atifhussain1900
    @atifhussain1900 Před 4 lety +2

    Brilliant insightful analysis .

  • @raeesazamraeesazam7550
    @raeesazamraeesazam7550 Před 2 lety +3

    Fantastic English speaker whose lectures I always listen like people listen music 🎵

  • @muneebabbas1041
    @muneebabbas1041 Před 5 lety +7

    I love you Tariq ali

  • @tee39
    @tee39 Před 2 lety +1

    Truly brilliant!

  • @king93585
    @king93585 Před 11 lety +13

    great.i can feel his pain of seeing his people in suffering.great guy

    • @andyhoward1811
      @andyhoward1811 Před 3 lety +3

      Mr Tariq Ali should be at the forefront thinkers during discussions on Pakistan

    • @eggytoast
      @eggytoast Před rokem

      ​@@andyhoward1811 He won't because the neo-liberal and right wing gatekeepers hate him, both in the UK where he lives and Pakistan. He criticises everybody.

  • @sarangkulkarni5751
    @sarangkulkarni5751 Před rokem

    Gentleman refuses to mince words, what great insights!

  • @Shaewaros
    @Shaewaros Před 10 lety +8

    Thank you so much for this conversation, it really helped me to understand Pakistan's political history.

  • @idbhandari9952
    @idbhandari9952 Před rokem

    It is always treat to listen to Tarik Ali.He is intellectual par excellence having grip on subjects he speaks.

  • @davidjohnson-pz2df
    @davidjohnson-pz2df Před 5 lety +3

    Bravo Tariq !!

  • @swetketu12
    @swetketu12 Před 5 lety +7

    Fascinating Q&A session with Mr. Ali around the evolution of Pakistan. However i couldn't help notice how Harry Kriesler carefully avoided really exploring the elephant in the room, the role of the puppet masters both US and its western allies' role in creating and sustaining this, even today. He alluded to this question several times during the discussion (as this is central idea of the book) but never really allowed it to see the light. It was to Mr Ali's credit , that he did touch upon the subject couple of times during the conversation.

  • @robbdavies7749
    @robbdavies7749 Před 4 měsíci

    Soo interesting!

  • @LovethisLife785
    @LovethisLife785 Před 11 měsíci

    Brilliant discussion.

  • @MrPrabhatRastogi
    @MrPrabhatRastogi Před rokem

    Awesome analysis…

  • @Chucku153
    @Chucku153 Před rokem

    MR TARIQ ALI, IT SO SUCH LEASURE TO LISTEN TO YOUR BRLLIANT ANALYSIS. THANK YOU

  • @xsrothebeginner8658
    @xsrothebeginner8658 Před rokem

    Trank you mr Ali

  • @robertrichard6107
    @robertrichard6107 Před 29 dny

    Good historical background info

  • @himathiatosuun.8354
    @himathiatosuun.8354 Před 7 lety +14

    And his grand father was chief minister of punjab b4 Pakistan.

    • @LalitKumar-cu5iu
      @LalitKumar-cu5iu Před 5 lety +1

      Did panjab exist as administrative or political unit before 1947 ?

    • @Chiefab22
      @Chiefab22 Před 5 lety +2

      Lalit Kumar yes

  • @PSkeepitcool
    @PSkeepitcool Před 5 lety +1

    He is straight forward n on point. Thought I am no from Pakistan but he wants beautiful Pakistan

  • @Dileepswarrier
    @Dileepswarrier Před 13 lety +5

    this man knows lot of things, really would like to know much more abut his books and journnals.......

  • @naturelover4312
    @naturelover4312 Před 5 lety +9

    love from Bharat

  • @CaptainCrules4life
    @CaptainCrules4life Před 12 lety +1

    @ollieraza So true.

  • @fileboy2002
    @fileboy2002 Před 6 lety +30

    Why are almost all the comments on this video one sentence long? There is a LOT to unpack here. Ali goes over many years of history, and goes into some detail about how different institutions evolved within the Pakistani state. Yet, the typical comment amount to something like, "Islam: A failed religion." Is that the best people can do? Are they able to trhow out little "zingers" and incapable of articulating anything more complex?

    • @vontsss
      @vontsss Před 5 lety +4

      indian agitprop. citizens in both india and pakistan are raised up to hate the other state.

    • @shayanahmed7132
      @shayanahmed7132 Před 3 lety +8

      Mostly anti-muslim hindutvata indian trolls who go looking for anything Pakistan-related just so they comment anything negative about Islam, even when it has nothing do with it.

    • @pkmkb_0
      @pkmkb_0 Před 2 lety +1

      @@shayanahmed7132 Exmuslims talk more negative about is1am than hindu ppl.
      don't judge based on social media they got both people on equal amount of hatred amongst themselves due to lack of knowledge or trolling purpose.

  • @MC-gt6yp
    @MC-gt6yp Před 5 lety +2

    Incredible insight into covert operations.

  • @bankimkulshreshtha8695
    @bankimkulshreshtha8695 Před 4 lety +2

    How greatly truthful,bankim Kulshrestha Advocatre India

  • @adv.fidahussainwazir2902

    wow

  • @vasukinagabhushan
    @vasukinagabhushan Před 6 lety +27

    West Punjab, East Bengal and Sindh were separated from rest of Bharat for the first time in history by the unholy partition of India.

    • @vontsss
      @vontsss Před 5 lety

      bengal was divided earlier in 1905

    • @KudmiKudmali81
      @KudmiKudmali81 Před 4 lety

      @@vontsss but people joined it immediately after that !

    • @vasukinagabhushan
      @vasukinagabhushan Před 3 lety

      @J C Don't regurgitate meaningless phrases you picked from the West or Islamists. If there was no Bharat, then how there Maha Bharat 5000 years back? Indians start our daily prayers with Bharata Khande... Jamboo Dweepe...

    • @mythbusterUSA
      @mythbusterUSA Před 3 lety

      BS. Punjab, Sindh had a separate identity. It was never part of India. Present day Pakistan always existed as country. Indus valley people are very different from ganga and jamuna people.

  • @thekingofoktimes
    @thekingofoktimes Před 5 lety +4

    It's a good interview and all but what bothers me is that the video says 2008 but it seems like it was recorded in 1995.

  • @ayushvashisht70429
    @ayushvashisht70429 Před 5 lety +3

    It’s written in bhagwat geeta that for destroying a person never fight him just make him feel that he is the best and everyone is useless

  • @designerabhishekbansal
    @designerabhishekbansal Před 3 lety +2

    Jews where persecuted based on religion. Pakistan Muslims where not persecuted based on religion, they wanted a seperate country as they felt insecure with Hindu's. Hence comparing Pakistan with Israel is not correct.

  • @dasbidrohi
    @dasbidrohi Před 5 lety +2

    Sadly in India even though government is providing free education and mid day meal there are a lot of students are going to madrasa.. it's in nature not a need.. it's blood affinity

  • @bapyou
    @bapyou Před 13 lety +3

    I don't understand: The video description lists the date of the interivew as 11/2008, but the upload date is October 30, 2008. Confusing. ~:-0

  • @Dileepswarrier
    @Dileepswarrier Před 13 lety +5

    politics is all about money even not only Pakistan but also in most of the world..

  • @harshbhandari9070
    @harshbhandari9070 Před 4 lety

    17:00 onwards till 30:00 till end
    27:28 his way of speaking
    35:45

  • @ankurdutta3277
    @ankurdutta3277 Před 5 lety +2

    Do you see what the Interviewer did? 7:19

  • @statickk14
    @statickk14 Před 15 lety +7

    I didn't say Islam is the sole reason, I said it plays a significant role. Saudi maybe be rich in oil money but that is an intellectually bankrupt nation.

  • @drcolmunirahmed9065
    @drcolmunirahmed9065 Před 2 lety

    Tariff Ali khan was president Young speakers unioon at the than govt college Lahore
    I was also studying in govt college
    I saw him debates every week In 1961/62

  • @suryaprakashguthula6337

    This interview more emphasis on US -Pak relationship.

  • @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo
    @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo Před 3 lety +1

    Now the Tribal areas are merged in KPK province . and NWFP has been renamed as Khaiber Pakhtoon Khawa (KPK)

  • @myroseaccount
    @myroseaccount Před 3 lety +3

    This is two rational, moral and ethical intellectuals discussing the actions of gangsters. The gangsters are the leaders and governments of countries: Pakistan, India, USA, UK, France, EU, Russia etc etc.
    Imagine intelligent and enlightened individuals discussing the mayhem caused by how the Mafia runs its' bloody businesses and how that could be done with less blood and mayhem.
    That is essentially the topic of international relations. The study of gangsters. The top boss is in Washington and they have rivals and capos in various parts of the world and the approach and strategy varies accordingly.
    Think Tony Soprano's different approaches to dealing with Casinos, Hotels, Bars, and the Garbage and Gardening business. Different issues and challenges with different players. International relations is similar, just more violent and less complex

  • @getevennow
    @getevennow Před rokem

    We are expecting him at our Finland Station for a long time. We need a new Commissar for War very urgently

  • @dr.sakshinbelgavi
    @dr.sakshinbelgavi Před 5 lety +1

    I wish this eloquent gentleman was born in India :)

    • @raheelbelal5848
      @raheelbelal5848 Před 5 lety +2

      Sakshin Belagavi its good he's born in pakistan because he is really saying things the way it is rather than the typical Pakistani/Indian insults i read on the internet.

    • @dr.sakshinbelgavi
      @dr.sakshinbelgavi Před 4 lety +2

      @@raheelbelal5848 i guess you're right I really hope we get along well with Pakistan... At least to the terms where violence stops and we can be economical and strategic friends ... We need more people like him in Pakistan

    • @caesaraugust1441
      @caesaraugust1441 Před 2 lety +2

      @@dr.sakshinbelgavi if India and Pakistan cooperate instead of fight, we both seek to benefit. We can build up our industries, they can build up theirs, and we can benefit a lot through border to border trade.

  • @motow3031
    @motow3031 Před 2 lety

    Any geopolitical problem or conflict always check Tariq,s problem.

  • @Zeitaluq
    @Zeitaluq Před 11 měsíci +1

    I wonder about the Muslim Congress elite at the time around the time of Indian National Congress? They seem to have been educated in western institutions as Lawyers and aside from academia had lacking of understanding to help their people in countries of origin.

  • @ahmedhumayunrasheed2434

    Charlie Wilson War starring Tom Hanks - The Afghan War and how Russians were driven out of Afghanistan!

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety +1

    Pakistan elites never permitted serious land reforms as India has done. India pushed through land reforms ended the power of big landlords so there was always a feeling of ambiguity from all the section of ordinary people

    • @hassanrajput9576
      @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

      The basic idea on which it had been buil of uniting the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent had gone and been buried. So what was the new state going to be dad was the big question. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto did dream of it build Pakistan as a modern social democratic state, He was dumped on Kissinger's order

  • @statickk14
    @statickk14 Před 15 lety +7

    Real tragedy is that Tariq Ali fails to see how Islam plays a significant role in bringing where Pakistan is today.

  • @henrytan5588
    @henrytan5588 Před rokem

    It is great that Tariq Ali has mentioned Mahathir of Malaysia on educating the Moslem to have command of a second language which is English. Times has changed. Now Ismail Sabri is promoting the use of the native language and denying the Malay access to advanced knowledge. Mahathir did not object the promotion of the use of the native language.

  • @LalitKumar-cu5iu
    @LalitKumar-cu5iu Před 5 lety

    Guys listen at 2x speed for 10 minutes and then reduce to normal....

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    16:43

  • @Nomadicsouls813
    @Nomadicsouls813 Před 13 lety +1

    @bapyou its 09/2008

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    32:23

  • @raosharyar5574
    @raosharyar5574 Před 2 lety

    10:45

  • @kinimini9276
    @kinimini9276 Před 3 lety

    10:00

  • @DKC1122
    @DKC1122 Před 2 lety

    Empires become myopic and they can do anything they want to a country. many times what is done to a country depends on what the country wants to do to itself .

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    10:02

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    46:41

  • @aleempervaiz8789
    @aleempervaiz8789 Před 3 lety +1

    The problem with Pakistani and Indians is that they are unable to understand that a book is a book and particularly a research-based book is a document that reflects the point of view of its author in the light of his inferences. Inferences of an author may be wrong or maybe right. An author spends too much time in research so he/she in reference to commoners, in most of the cases has better knowledge and understanding. When the afresh author emerges and keeping in view the point of view of the previous ones, evolves a new theory, the old and older ones are discarded at once, this is unfair.
    Research is a continuous process particularly in History, it's a never-ending topic. The tragedy of History is that it is interpreted in the light of a specific era. The authors are projected for different reasons, purposes, and motives. The western authors have poor rather rubbish ideas on certain issues but due to global western domination, they are predominant as compare to the Eastern authors.
    Also, keep in mind older times of Historians are a better source but in respect to modern times, they are irrelevant. For me, every serious attempt at research is highly appreciatable.

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    45:53

  • @prof.dr.4224
    @prof.dr.4224 Před 3 lety +2

    We ( myself Victoria Miroshnik and Dipak Basu) have analyzed this issue in our book, India as an organization, published by Palgrave-Macmillan. The thesis of Ayesha Jalal was wrong. Jinnah was recruited by the British in 1934 to create a new state where the British Army could stay to protect the Middle East from the Soviet Union and the sea route between the Suez Canal and Australia. NS Sarila, who was the ADC for the last three Vice-Roys of India, wrote that in his book. There are two others who were recruited by the British: Gandhi in 1915 and Ambedkar in 1930.
    British supported the Muslim League wholeheartedly from the beginning in 1906. In every riot, British police took the position to support the Muslims. That was obvious in August 1946 in Calcutta, then in Noakhali, and Chittagong in East Bengal. Pakistan was created by the British and Jinnah, Gandhi, Ambedkar were the British agents.
    Gandhi planned Pakistan in 1943. He sent his plan to Jinnah through Rajagopalachari, but Jinnah wanted a corridor through India which Gandhi could not agree with.

  • @xohaibiqbal4395
    @xohaibiqbal4395 Před 8 měsíci

    There was no corruption in Pakistan before the Nawaz Sharif's entry in politics in 1985
    After Nawaz Sharif, it was Zardari who took a 02nd lead in corruption

  • @vasukinagabhushan
    @vasukinagabhushan Před 3 lety +2

    f there was no Bharat, then how there Maha Bharat 5000 years back? Indians start our daily prayers with Bharata Khande... Jamboo Dweepe...

  • @ASIFKARACHI1988
    @ASIFKARACHI1988 Před 11 lety +3

    very nice comment,,,,,,,wahabis are the followers of Bhkharee and his Hadith...not quran and rasool-e-pak.

  • @Dileepswarrier
    @Dileepswarrier Před 13 lety

    politics is all about money even not only in Pakistan but also in most of the world..

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    Big landowners control 40% of land and irrigation

  • @vinm300
    @vinm300 Před 3 lety

    15:00 "The Jesuits used to say this"
    Very true read Adam Zamoyski, Poland was a pluralist society until the Counter Reformation Jesuits arrived.
    Today it is 93% Catholic.

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    19:00 vimp

  • @Aviation07101
    @Aviation07101 Před 5 lety +3

    As a patriotic Pakistan i agree with him that majority of the Pakistani people have been unlucky not to have a political leadership who care for them but alot has changed since 2008. Area which he is talking about is getting fenced and NWFP is called by ethnic name Khaibar Pukhtukhwa e.g KPK and also FATA region is merged constitutionally into Pakistan. 2 Governmens have completed their tenure of course with loads of corruption but army has resisted the coup. Now it Imran Khan there is hope as he is not a seasoned politician but he is not corrupt which is more important. Pakistan army has agreed on controlled democracy thats why you see army chief touring different countries. Only thing left is when they will start spending money on people of Pakistan and how much. Also weapons purchased by Pakistan from US have gone from 2 billions to 22 millions so good bye Americans.

    • @quiasnoorzad
      @quiasnoorzad Před 5 lety

      Waqas Maqsood how come FATA region and kpk looks more like Afghanistan then the rest of Pakistan like Punjab region??

    • @siddharthkaley9304
      @siddharthkaley9304 Před 4 lety

      You seem to be deluded
      knowing your thoughts through your comment.

  • @matinoutho9058
    @matinoutho9058 Před rokem

    The Muslim league were the spoilers

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    Pakistan is a State nota Nation as India is with highly diversified phenomena

  • @mrNashmann
    @mrNashmann Před 8 lety

    part of sikh punjab he is forgetting that why did they not get gujrat

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    The basic idea on which it had been buil of uniting the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent had gone and been buried. So what was the new state going to be dad was the big question. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto did dream of it build Pakistan as a modern social democratic state, He was dumped on Kissinger's order

  • @rocktube1958
    @rocktube1958 Před 3 lety +1

    Tariq would say what to Modi today

  • @rhaegar2138
    @rhaegar2138 Před 4 lety +1

    For all the Indians in the comments fawning because he criticises Pakistan, you should listen to Tariq's views on the Indian Occupation of Kashmir.

  • @swetketu12
    @swetketu12 Před 5 lety +1

    Alternate history - how would the world be different today if both the Congress and the Muslim league had been little more sensible and a little less selfish and avoided partition? The population as well as the landmass would have been bigger and may even be slightly more difficult to govern, but a united Indian subcontinent would have had much bigger geo-political clout and i am not even talking about the "soft clout" that comes from cultural influence. As a nation the huge defence expenditure could have been more fruitfully deployed in other development projects bringing prosperity, as India would no longer be surrounded by 2 nuclear armed enemy states. China's proxy war through Pakistan would be absent. The vast landmass and stretch of India, direct connection with Asean countries would help balance China. The islamisation threat, that is exported from Pakistan and in recent years from Bangladesh would have been much more moderated since the big drivers like the Kashmir issue and the state sponsors would no longer be present. Think how the entire pre-independance India, Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian and others worked in cohesion to boot out colonial powers, no reason why the same harmony wouldn't continue with little counter-narrative. There might be minor scuffles but which country doesn't have that today. In conclusion, India's history of non-violent independence movement, non aggressive stance vis-a-vis any of its neighbors, the fact that it would not only be the largest democracy but also more powerful and prosperous would have brought long lasting stability and peace to the whole region.

    • @hasan_z
      @hasan_z Před 5 lety

      This is what Gandhi and the Khilafat movement wanted when they joined forces

    • @blackdoesntmeanbad6058
      @blackdoesntmeanbad6058 Před 11 měsíci

      Naive

    • @Nobody-zv5lp
      @Nobody-zv5lp Před 19 dny

      Great point. Wouldn't that be great? However, there were a few more reasons why bengali Muslims and lower caste hindus wanted a country where the zamindari/feudal systems were eradicated. This is because both these groups were oppressed by the Jomidars/Zamindars. In East Pakistan and now Bangladesh, this (land reforms) was accomplished. In India the land reforms were done but now in 2024, one cannot imagine harmonious living. In Pakistan feudal system is still entrenched.

  • @hassanrajput9576
    @hassanrajput9576 Před 3 lety

    Bangladesh even has different take on Islam

  • @doydark4ever
    @doydark4ever Před 11 lety +1

    GREAT POST cruelbeast83

  • @himathiatosuun.8354
    @himathiatosuun.8354 Před 7 lety

    But do you know who this man is. son of tahira ali and moshin ali.

    • @grc178
      @grc178 Před 5 lety

      Who were tahira n mohsin

  • @shahidnawaz2115
    @shahidnawaz2115 Před 2 lety +1

    Sir, I am very much skeptical that India was ready to give its air fields to USA if Pakistan had refused. Simply India 's foreign policy is quite different as that of Pakistan.

    • @prateekmishra7803
      @prateekmishra7803 Před rokem

      It is not driven by religion and hatred for native religion of Indian subcontinent...

    • @khipksy1888
      @khipksy1888 Před 7 měsíci

      Its not hearsay, the Indian govt did make that offer, and I remember a lot of Indian journalists asking US govt officials in white house press briefings for why they are not accepting Indian offer and attacking Pakistan.

  • @farzeensarfaraz1407
    @farzeensarfaraz1407 Před 3 lety

    Its the fuedal system which India did this as soon as it come into being

    • @farzeensarfaraz1407
      @farzeensarfaraz1407 Před 3 lety

      What about the 1965 war

    • @farzeensarfaraz1407
      @farzeensarfaraz1407 Před 3 lety

      I am afraid tor I ran who dreams of a social Islamic stre because inner outer forces have unshea them their fangs

  • @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo
    @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo Před 3 lety

    Tariq sahib is little misinterpreting madsras although they give religious but besides they at least give education wiht urdu as basic language

  • @2msvalkyrie529
    @2msvalkyrie529 Před 9 měsíci

    He COULD travel to Pakistan and lecture them about their faults. But like most of our self styled revolutionaries he prefers to live in a hated " Western "
    democracy . Cowardice I suppose .....or Common sense ?

  • @ShaswataShaha
    @ShaswataShaha Před rokem

    This video has aged well.