What are your thoughts on the history and myth surrounding the establishment of the early Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms? Check us out on Patreon: www.patreon.com/The_Study_of_Antiquity_and_the_Middle_Ages
@@treering8228 Maybe cut back on da Cola Soda an Try again !! It does require Con concentration but can be 'ore'some once you get the hang of it! Lol!! 🕵💂.VM .R😸
@@NothingIsKnown00 I can say that the experience of lstening to lectures like this on my phone while lounging on a sofa drinking and smoking is a far more enjoyable one than sitting in an uncomfortable chair in a lecture hall.
Noone watches history as a hobby who doesn't love and value it. Its distressing how willfully ignorant many choose to be today in the face of so much readily available scholarship and teaching. Last year I heard an English kid complain that the Blitz and WW2 weren't relevant to his generation, why study it? You hear so many say similar, world wide.
The further you get away from an event the iess relevancy it seems UK have. 70 odd years after WW2 it is difficult for some young people to comprehend the changes this war caused to occur. Even Thatcherism is difficult for them to fully appreciate, and that was only 40 years ago. It's like a teenager stopping smoking to prevent the 60 year old stranger that the stranger he'll become to his younger self from getting lung cancer.
It is an excellent study about ancient history , informative measures so that you must understand what's the differences till you find the nature of humanity, I think what I thought was POWER AND ECONOMY. STRUGGLE FOR LIFE.
Interesting about the alliteration point. Almost all the king's of Wessex begin their names with an E, couple with an A. ( same thing if ae is being used.) Woder if it was a fashion thing. A sign of worthiness. Copying the names of previous rulers has always been popular, hence some high regnal numbers attached to some names.
Place names ending in "-ing" are found in Denmark too and are some of the oldest. As far as I know it's just an inflection and doesn't have it's own meaning.
LOVED this lecture... but... I might say.....when the lecturer puts up a map for you to see and talk about, PUT THE FUCKING CAMERA ON IT!!!! Come on camera man!
What similarities or common enemies/causes brought the Heptarchy into being? Or was there just a long period of battles between them all ending in stalemates? I guess what I'm asking is what made them collectively "Anglo-Saxon"?
The Anglo-Saxons did not use the term for themselves. It is rather a modern summary of inhabitants living in England and speaking West Germanic dialects.
It's the Normans who were the nasty conquerors. I believe the Normans were descendants of the Vikings. The Normans invaded and conquered the Anglo-Saxons of Britain. The Anglo-Saxons were not as aggressive as the Normans and I believe the genetics are different.
@@c.norbertneumann4986 Except on old documents they describe Anglo -saxonium" so not sure you're correct. They called themselves anglisc/englisc from about the 9th century. The Angles were the dominant group I believe, that's why the country is called England.
Could the family name of Wick originate from Saxony or is it Celtic-British. The name is also known in Germany-Austria, and even family weapon shields, or knights weapon shields with that name emerge there.
In British place names it is often linked to Roman settlements mostly, but, not always next to Castrum (Forts) from the Latin "Vicus". No idea about surnames.
@@Doubledig Thanks for the info. I often get confused by names, Just this week I learned with interest that the term 'inflammable' does not in fact mean that something is not flammable. The word does not follow the same negative rule as other words prefixed 'in', such as inaudible, insatiable, indiscreet, etc. I also burnt my arse cheeks quite badly.
Because it was the last one probably where the warriors and refugees ended up after being pushed back by the vikings. Plus being the last kingdom it is likely they put up one hell of a fight knowing if Wessex fell it was all over. A bit like Stalingrad.
@@mrdarren1045thank you for your response . I was thinking that maybe because of the actions made by Alfred the great when he first paid them to keep them away for a while and also because of the defense system he made to protect Wessex when he built walled settlement to protect the kingdom called burghs
Technically the Western part of Mercia was unconquered too, but unfortunately there aren't many sources to help explain what actually happened. Aside from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which is heavily skewed in favour of the House of Wessex. There was even a hoard discovered recently of coins bearing Alfred's head on one side and Aethelred of Mercia's on the other, suggesting a more equal standing between the rulers than history would have you believe. Guess we'll never know...
Caesars Conquest of Gaul indicates the tribes he met in south east England were very closely related to the Celtic/Germanic people's the Romans had encountered in modern day France and the Low Countries.
some of the Iron Age tribes that inhabited what was to become England had only recently ( within a few hundred years) crossed the channel from Belgium when Caesar invaded. I believe that Caractacus was from that stock of Belgae.
The name Belgium has nothing to do with the ancient Belgae, other than that the name was invented and introduced in the mid 19th century when the country was created out of the Spanish or Austrian Netherlands and in typical 19th century fashion they took a name that harked back to an ancient heroic past, like the "Batavian Republic", as the Netherlands were briefly called in Napoleonic times. Many of the ancient Belgic tribes were Germanic by the way.
A decent enough overview of the period, concentrating more on the heptarchy and after than on the post-Roman period. 43 minutes to cover nearly 400 years of history fraught with issues regarding our understanding of what happened.
Spent a lot of camera time on the Prof, and missed some illustrations. Rather distressed that it took time to get someone to recognize that Hept was seven and that alliterative or alliteration was consonant repetition...
Cumbria allways seems to get forgotton about... one of the last strongholds of the brittons... there will have been a time when all the peoples of Brittany (france), Cornwall, Wales and Cumbria will have all been able to understand each other.... "The old north"... before the days when the Irish invaded Scotland and... well.. that was the end of the Pict's... the Celts originally came from south east Turkey, Northern Iraq... the Cumbric language was lost about a thousand years ago... The Anglish finished off most of the Britons when they invaded... The Romans mentioned a tribe in there dispatches, (west Cumbria), The Santees they named them.. (wrong spelling i think). They only got mentioned a couple of times... Would love to find out more info on them..
Rheghed in Cumbria thought to be the last kingdom of Celtic British long after rest of country was ruled by Saxons. There was fought the last battle of the native people. Shame it's so overlooked both historically and archaeologically.
@@MatthewMcVeagh The possible variation of this name is Caraticos, another form of the Celtic name 'Cara Tog' or 'Cara Tag -os', meaning 'beloved of/dear to the god Togo/Tag/Dagda'.
Well as the lecturer the kingdoms were not created they evolved sully by military success of one group over another. Which more or less common to any society you review
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle describes how King Vortigern, a Brittonic Celtic king, invited the Angles to come and receive land in return for helping him defend his realm against marauding Picts. Those successful Angles sent word back that good land was available and that the British were "worthless". A wholesale emigration of Angles and kindred Germanic peoples followed.
@@AethelwulfOfNordHymbraLand2333 you quoted the official "history", the official "history" and the present past are not the same thing.Deutsche has no related peoples, just like the Britons, Gauls (so-called French), Chinese, Poles, Spaniards, Italians, Greeks, Serbs, Lithuanians, ... and so on have no related peoples, this is a lie of official "historians" . is it so hard to understand?
Thanks for the excellent glimpse into a very interesting part of European history of the western islands, (long after the submerging of what is alluded to, by the name 'Doggerland')... The late and post-roman period, the tribal migrations and the construction of some sort of rulership, (kingdom, despotate and protectorate of various sizes and residual tribal culture's traditions). The time before the "viking age", is a very little known, but probably very dynamic period. Especially before the ecclesiastical transition of the Roman empire into a pseudo-magical empire of that levantine God through the papacy of Rome and its Bishops, as Christianity gained power from the more popular "thing" based 'democracies' with chiefs and small armies and tribal traditions of people (being both artificers, peasants and warriors as required, and having a lifestyle according to necessity, like their ancestry from wherever their decent was) I'm not averse to study both the myths and folktales, as well as chronicles, sagas and other written sources. This should also be substantiated by archaeology and other sciences, if possible. Europe has a variety and diversity in the period, between the Romans and the formation of large ethnicity and geography determined national structures. I'm just some biologist, so excuse my rambling, off-topic to me..
You could come down to next Tuesdays lecture and help put the chairs away? But there's no way your touching the O.H.P if that's what you're getting at?
I'm going through this channel's videos and loving it . . . something I've been curious about for some time is why is there an East Anglia but not a West Anglia? Or is West Anglia Mercia? Hopefully someone more informed than me can let me know in these comments
Yes Mercia counts as 'West Anglia'. East Anglia may have been named in distinction from it. Mercia of course means 'borderland: it was where the Angles had a frontier and interface with the Britons.
Also, for a while a Kingdom of Middle Anglia existed in the south of Mercia. I was a vasall of East Anglia when the latter had defeated Mercia for a while.
Am guessing possibly my Ancestor was Magonsaete then. (Herefordshire). Offa later became King of the Area circa 800 and built the Dyke of course. Runs very close to Titley. Am going to visit this year! (On a bike). Theres a place called Titleys knob. (Ref to a lookout?) See what I can find out. Classic lecture. (I am BA Ancient & Med Hist).
Did the Picts perceive this "continuity"? Lol...aparently everybody loved the Romans now including all of those who fought against them. Maybe like how Conan loved Thulsa Doom?
@Hammer Go Bonk! Which sources would you cite ? After 210 the Romans stayed out of Caledonia unless they had to. There are sources that tell us the Picts, the Scots and the Saxons joined forces to raid and fight with the Romans, I was told by my pictish historian friend
Ironic this is a Turkish Uni. All those Saxon gold and garnet jewels must have been made in the Eastern Empire i.e. Constantinople. They're so similar they may have all come from one shipment. Unlikely, but it wants looking at.
Enjoyable, but the abject lack of knowledge from the students is particularly troubling. Of even the most basic facts of British history they are apparently ignorant.
Anglo Saxons are in many similar traits whit Kieran Russ in the mideval europe…Given that they were so dominant and that they created wast global empires
Yes exactly what caused the schism.The same thing happened in the east whit the Byzantine traditions…In fact the only reason why greek culture survived is because in the Middle Ages Russians opened many schools and greek was taught in all higher education
King Alfred did not fight the Vikings! He fought the Danes and defeated the Danes. His son and grandson re-conquered Danelaw not 'Vikinglaw'. The term Waelcyn (Viking) does not appear in the Anglo-Saxon chronicles until the early 10thC. It's use in any other time period is incorrect. Vikings appear to have been pirates and opportunists made up of many races - Byzantines, Irish, English, Norse, Danes and many others - they were not a race or tribe of any single people. Just because a term is popular or in common use does not make it correct.
Stop being so pedantic. We all know what he means by the term vikings and how it is interchangeable with Danes. Why is it random CZcams posters feel this need to one up qualified professors who no doubt know a lot more about this period than they do. Being a medieval reenacter doesn't make you an academic.
@@mrdarren1045 Who is a mediaeval re-enactor? I do have a suitable Degree and have been studying this particular period for nearly 50 years. Pedantry would appear to be more of your speciality. If I wished to be pedantic I could pick a lot of holes in this lecture - especially with regard to the use of the word Wealas and the dismissal of leaders of the first arrivals as being unlikely as they were all Fathers and Sons and/or Brothers. Of course, that never happend in history in such a sustained manner. The history of Hannibal and his father and Brothers fighting the Romans is obviously dubious as are the Scipios and as for Edward III and his son at Crecy, not to mention Henry V and his Brothers at Azincourt - preposterous! Interestingly, listened to another lecture about that Italian guy Caesar, who invaded France and conquered it and in 55 and 54 BC invaded England and fought the English before retiring to France and having a few more battles aginst the French and Belgians. Not quite right, but we all know who I mean. Don't you?
soooo many empty “legendary “ centuries... i hope one day our historians will find the courage to condense Saligarian Chronology as it should be per Fomenko and Heinsohn... also Comyns Beaumont will be critical to GB in reestablishing their true history and heritage... God bless :)
Owen W that sounds like a a response from someone who has studied a bit and thinks they know a lot. Fomenko is undoubtably on to something... his work is immense, precise, and far reaching... what he proposes in some instances pushes his evidence too far... but the avalanche of evidence he presents speaks for itself... and THAT is already gob-smacking. Scaligarian history is a complete fraud... and any serious historian has to admit to this if they have any integrity. a flip comment like yours betrays a lack of any serious investigation in the subject... hit the books with diligence and an open mind and come back in two years with a comment worth my time.
Owen W well i can see you are well read... you have my apologies... i think we can agree that his ultimate conclusions push the evidence too far... i’m an engineer familiar with probability methods... and can understand your reservations on his selectivity... all that said... his EVIDENCE nonetheless still speak volumes. the proliferation of the i(date)ing evidence... the phantom and repeating kingships... the astronomical evidence (which is much more than fancy footwork)... latin literature that is internally inconsistent... the secrecy and coverups in the Vatican, protecting and promoting their own power structures... look... i’ve read nearly 300 academic books on the matter and have made ancient history, mythology, astronomy, astrology, catastrophism, etc... my life’s work... i too agreed Fomenko’s many conclusions are off... but i am ever grateful to his dedication in assembling his extraordinary evidence. i welcome his work as addition to many other lines of evidence. i am 100% certain that Scaligarian chronology is a fraud... and that it is accepted as fundamentally true and the foundation for modern historians? this handicaps the whole of historical academia... they are utterly incapable of moving beyond such an encompassing fraud... whole careers would be dismantled... whole fields... its a catastrophe in itself. look at the pyramids around the globe... historians are at a complete loss to explain them... they know nearly nothing. it’s a travesty. God bless you dear seeker.
prehistoric tuna that’s a very insightful point... let’s just say... in a world literally glittering in electrical fire... as would be the case with a galactic center and/or solar flare... the “magic” you speak of would be everywhere on earth.... and harnessing it, while it lasted over several centuries, would be the bread and butter of all concurrent priests, engineers and kings. THAT is our true history.
John Ashtone what rapier sharp wit! you know... Socrates opined that wisdom begins when we realize how little we truly know... and that can only happen after many decades of earnest research and discovery... in this case its more than most mortals have time for while earning a living and providing for a family. only the rarest few can become educated and study enough to begin to sort this out... while many foolish graduates think their diplomas qualify them to espouse weighty opinions... when they’ve only just scratched the thinnest surface of the dogma they are fed. true history takes much more than being well read in the victors’ stories... but then... i am preaching to the choir here aren’t i? i’m obviously in the presence of an intellectual giant... wherefore in this conversation at least, i will gracefully bow and take my leave.
The world that existed pre claudian invasion, didn't exist any more! Then the power vacuums after the legions withdrew 410AD sucked in other userpers. In the end, the Welsh are the real British
All the sources this professor says are lacking can be found in Wilson & Blackett's books and the charters of Llandaff. This period was not dark at all.
rhythmstic: thank you for sharing your opinion. I would just note that you failed to cite a single solitary thing to support your opinion. I'm open to learning; my cursory online review, however, didn't turn up anything that supports your assertion.
@@j.d.snyder4466 Not being aware of, or choosing to ignore, the verified researches of W&B, is simply your loss. Feel grateful I took the time to mention it.
His accent is hardly posh. Although I'm pretty sure he's of welsh origin his accent is basically bog standard home counties RP. there is a difference between speaking posh and just speaking clearly. And there's nothing posh or snooty about his accent. He's just clear and well spoken.
And there's no such thing as a 'British accent'. There are literally hundreds of accents in Britain. Welsh Scottish and English accents are totally different and then within England alone there are countless regional accents.
you were wrong right from the start . Your politics are merely a narrow English language view of history . If you had read the Welsh historical record then you would no longer talk in terms of post Roman , pre- viking periods , but you would have to include Cymric rule over the whole of Britain , but the only thing that matters in the history allowed by the English monarchy is that which concentrates on the English invasions .
@@arturwojciechowicz3124 they don't mean Germans in the modern sense of the German nation. They mean 'Germanic'. Germanic peoples were written about in the roman period.
What are your thoughts on the history and myth surrounding the establishment of the early Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms?
Check us out on Patreon: www.patreon.com/The_Study_of_Antiquity_and_the_Middle_Ages
The Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages this kind of layout bored me to tears
Does Saxon mean "son of Issac"?
@@jonathananthonyhumphries2486 No Way Man!! Who Realy was He? Its Agreed meaning is 'People of the "Sæex'' or Iron Axe!!
OK Lad:) Peace 🐘🕵🐨 II.M.
@@treering8228 Maybe cut back on da Cola Soda an Try again !! It does require Con concentration but can be 'ore'some once you get the hang of it! Lol!!
🕵💂.VM .R😸
@Ben Fizz Anglo-Saxons brought a primitive form of early industrialization to Great Britain. Factory work, broom making. imo
Never cared about this while I was in school. Now that I’m pushing 50, I can’t get enough! Great lecture.
Me neither and King James Bible and Strongs concordance bible dictionary in Greek and Hebrew 👍💪😇🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I recommend the "Kings and Generals" and "Knowledgia" channels
I cared about it when I was a kid. School almost killed my interest. Glad I stayed with it.
Haha me too
@@NothingIsKnown00 I can say that the experience of lstening to lectures like this on my phone while lounging on a sofa drinking and smoking is a far more enjoyable one than sitting in an uncomfortable chair in a lecture hall.
Brilliant lecture I screamed the answer out about Wessex but no one could hear me, ill watch all your stuff now
Here are the lectures we have uploaded so far!
czcams.com/play/PL4pSZ5yOhlImzhDWchYUozGpHq2nwfGkz.html
Lol love it
Noone watches history as a hobby who doesn't love and value it. Its distressing how willfully ignorant many choose to be today in the face of so much readily available scholarship and teaching. Last year I heard an English kid complain that the Blitz and WW2 weren't relevant to his generation, why study it? You hear so many say similar, world wide.
The further you get away from an event the iess relevancy it seems UK have. 70 odd years after WW2 it is difficult for some young people to comprehend the changes this war caused to occur. Even Thatcherism is difficult for them to fully appreciate, and that was only 40 years ago.
It's like a teenager stopping smoking to prevent the 60 year old stranger that the stranger he'll become to his younger self from getting lung cancer.
Really enjoy this guys lectures. Something oddly relaxing about them.
Right agree partic for those who love England and british hisotry.
the content is great; I sure wish those maps were in focus.
The best look at 'old' England I've seen since
Anything by dr. Kenneth harl or Eric Kline? Other viewers would be interested in listening to either of these men. You always have such great content.
I love this guy. Seems like somebody finally had him pull the mic away from his shirt in this one!
I wish my school would learn about these types of things because this is my type of stuff geography and history and politics
this guy gives the comfiest lectures
Wow im from srilanka a would like to study more about king aethelwolf and kingdom of wessex
I'm from Newark upon Trent.
right in the middle of it all.
my town is called-
The key Town to the North.
Really interesting! Wish I had a teacher like this when I was at school.
It is an excellent study about ancient history , informative measures so that you must understand what's the differences till you find the nature of humanity, I think what I thought was POWER AND ECONOMY. STRUGGLE FOR LIFE.
Interesting about the alliteration point. Almost all the king's of Wessex begin their names with an E, couple with an A. ( same thing if ae is being used.) Woder if it was a fashion thing. A sign of worthiness. Copying the names of previous rulers has always been popular, hence some high regnal numbers attached to some names.
I am English and in more touch with this time than the current one what a mess it is now
Place names ending in "-ing" are found in Denmark too and are some of the oldest. As far as I know it's just an inflection and doesn't have it's own meaning.
From the Old English "Ingas" meaning of the people or the peoples. Cottingham - Cotts peoples village
Could you do videos of individual profiles of the people mentioned?
LOVED this lecture... but... I might say.....when the lecturer puts up a map for you to see and talk about, PUT THE FUCKING CAMERA ON IT!!!! Come on camera man!
What similarities or common enemies/causes brought the Heptarchy into being? Or was there just a long period of battles between them all ending in stalemates? I guess what I'm asking is what made them collectively "Anglo-Saxon"?
The Anglo-Saxons did not use the term for themselves. It is rather a modern summary of inhabitants living in England and speaking West Germanic dialects.
It's the Normans who were the nasty conquerors. I believe the Normans were descendants of the Vikings. The Normans invaded and conquered the Anglo-Saxons of Britain. The Anglo-Saxons were not as aggressive as the Normans and I believe the genetics are different.
C Norbert: That sounds right but can you expand or amplify? Sources? I'd like to learn more.
@@ellyreginald6546 😂😂😂😂😂😂hepiniz vahşi idiniz.
@@c.norbertneumann4986 Except on old documents they describe Anglo -saxonium" so not sure you're correct. They called themselves anglisc/englisc from about the 9th century. The Angles were the dominant group I believe, that's why the country is called England.
Could the family name of Wick originate from Saxony or is it Celtic-British. The name is also known in Germany-Austria, and even family weapon shields, or knights weapon shields with that name emerge there.
In British place names it is often linked to Roman settlements mostly, but, not always next to Castrum (Forts) from the Latin "Vicus". No idea about surnames.
I suspect Bilkent University is in Kent - perhaps close to Portland Bill.
Bilkent University is in Ankara, Turkey!
@@Doubledig Thanks for the info. I often get confused by names, Just this week I learned with interest that the term 'inflammable' does not in fact mean that something is not flammable. The word does not follow the same negative rule as other words prefixed 'in', such as inaudible, insatiable, indiscreet, etc. I also burnt my arse cheeks quite badly.
To add, Portland Bill is in Dorset.
I like learning about the history. Good lecture.
Does he ever finish a subject or is everything going to be discussed later?
We'll cover that topic in next Tuesdays lecture
Why wessex was the only kingdom Left unconquered ?
Because it was the last one probably where the warriors and refugees ended up after being pushed back by the vikings. Plus being the last kingdom it is likely they put up one hell of a fight knowing if Wessex fell it was all over. A bit like Stalingrad.
@@mrdarren1045thank you for your response .
I was thinking that maybe because of the actions made by Alfred the great when he first paid them to keep them away for a while and also because of the defense system he made to protect Wessex when he built walled settlement to protect the kingdom called burghs
Technically the Western part of Mercia was unconquered too, but unfortunately there aren't many sources to help explain what actually happened. Aside from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which is heavily skewed in favour of the House of Wessex.
There was even a hoard discovered recently of coins bearing Alfred's head on one side and Aethelred of Mercia's on the other, suggesting a more equal standing between the rulers than history would have you believe.
Guess we'll never know...
35:33 Bebbanburg ,* my name is Uhtred son of Uhtred ,
Destiny is all*
born in Utrecht, the netherlands.... ;)
Utrecht. I was born there. Dollardstraat. Lovely binnenstad.
Love this - Good professor - thank you!
Many thanks! Broad my knowledge about Dark ages!
Thank you. This is fascinating
Where is the next part of the lecture? I need it.
czcams.com/video/Aw4hyvEReFk/video.html
I would like to know more of the trading between Romans in Brittain and the mainland.
Fantastic subject
I believe Kent is also connected to mainland Celts, like Bretons and Belgae, whose name share an etymological connection to Belgium.
Caesars Conquest of Gaul indicates the tribes he met in south east England were very closely related to the Celtic/Germanic people's the Romans had encountered in modern day France and the Low Countries.
Kent was a Jutish kingdom from Jutland which is modern day southern Denmark
some of the Iron Age tribes that inhabited what was to become England had only recently ( within a few hundred years) crossed the channel from Belgium when Caesar invaded. I believe that Caractacus was from that stock of Belgae.
The name Belgium has nothing to do with the ancient Belgae, other than that the name was invented and introduced in the mid 19th century when the country was created out of the Spanish or Austrian Netherlands and in typical 19th century fashion they took a name that harked back to an ancient heroic past, like the "Batavian Republic", as the Netherlands were briefly called in Napoleonic times. Many of the ancient Belgic tribes were Germanic by the way.
A decent enough overview of the period, concentrating more on the heptarchy and after than on the post-Roman period. 43 minutes to cover nearly 400 years of history fraught with issues regarding our understanding of what happened.
Upload one of your lectures!
@@jf13579 ? Come to my university and listen to some.
@@larsprec upload & link. I am limited by COVID restrictions here. Want to hear your expertise on the matter my friend.
@@jf13579 not a bad idea, perhaps I shall do so in the days to come
Spent a lot of camera time on the Prof, and missed some illustrations. Rather distressed that it took time to get someone to recognize that Hept was seven and that alliterative or alliteration was consonant repetition...
Heptarchy - 7 Kingdoms. OK - a certain Mr. Martin has been at your lectures.
No mention of the Picts defeat of the Northumbrians at Dunnechin , an event of huge significance.
Obviously of more significance for you.
Cumbria allways seems to get forgotton about... one of the last strongholds of the brittons... there will have been a time when all the peoples of Brittany (france), Cornwall, Wales and Cumbria will have all been able to understand each other.... "The old north"... before the days when the Irish invaded Scotland and... well.. that was the end of the Pict's... the Celts originally came from south east Turkey, Northern Iraq... the Cumbric language was lost about a thousand years ago... The Anglish finished off most of the Britons when they invaded... The Romans mentioned a tribe in there dispatches, (west Cumbria), The Santees they named them.. (wrong spelling i think). They only got mentioned a couple of times... Would love to find out more info on them..
Wasn't the Irish takeover of modern day Scotland more of a cultural revolution amongst the Picts rather than a military takeover?
@@user-ys5yv2nz6w my mums side are Britons.
armorica
There was no genocide of the native Britons, that's Victorian race science and had no place in modern academia.
Rheghed in Cumbria thought to be the last kingdom of Celtic British long after rest of country was ruled by Saxons. There was fought the last battle of the native people. Shame it's so overlooked both historically and archaeologically.
Everyone talks about Wessex, Essex, Sussex, but I never hear about Middlesex
Have you guys checked out Escomb Saxon church?
It is stated that Cerdic came from Gaul. What events were happening in Gaul that could have precipitated his departure?
Where is it stated?
@@MatthewMcVeagh Anglo-saxon chronicle. I would tell you the year, but better u do some research.
@@jdshaman6448 No you do the damn research, it's you who's made the claim.
@@MatthewMcVeagh Research is not daming, it is rather revelatory.
@@MatthewMcVeagh The possible variation of this name is Caraticos, another form of the Celtic name 'Cara Tog' or 'Cara Tag -os', meaning 'beloved of/dear to the god Togo/Tag/Dagda'.
I have a question for users who are seriously engaged in the study of the past, what caused the "creation" of the Anglo-Saxon "kingdoms"?
Geography, boundaries, limits of manpower, tribal affiliations and culture.
Well as the lecturer the kingdoms were not created they evolved sully by military success of one group over another. Which more or less common to any society you review
@@duncbee \ sully by military success of one group over another.\ these two groups have specific names. what are these two groups called?
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle describes how King Vortigern, a Brittonic Celtic king, invited the Angles to come and receive land in return for helping him defend his realm against marauding Picts. Those successful Angles sent word back that good land was available and that the British were "worthless". A wholesale emigration of Angles and kindred Germanic peoples followed.
@@AethelwulfOfNordHymbraLand2333 you quoted the official "history", the official "history" and the present past are not the same thing.Deutsche has no related peoples, just like the Britons, Gauls (so-called French), Chinese, Poles, Spaniards, Italians, Greeks, Serbs, Lithuanians, ... and so on have no related peoples, this is a lie of official "historians" . is it so hard to understand?
by the way many of the burials were genuine continental germanic settlers...based on the genetic data...
But, where did the umbrian/cambrians/omry come from?
I think he didnt cover that cause cambria is wales. But cumbria is one of the angles.
Thanks for the excellent glimpse into a very interesting part of European history of the western islands, (long after the submerging of what is alluded to, by the name 'Doggerland')...
The late and post-roman period, the tribal migrations and the construction of some sort of rulership, (kingdom, despotate and protectorate of various sizes and residual tribal culture's traditions). The time before the "viking age", is a very little known, but probably very dynamic period. Especially before the ecclesiastical transition of the Roman empire into a pseudo-magical empire of that levantine God through the papacy of Rome and its Bishops, as Christianity gained power from the more popular "thing" based 'democracies' with chiefs and small armies and tribal traditions of people (being both artificers, peasants and warriors as required, and having a lifestyle according to necessity, like their ancestry from wherever their decent was)
I'm not averse to study both the myths and folktales, as well as chronicles, sagas and other written sources. This should also be substantiated by archaeology and other sciences, if possible. Europe has a variety and diversity in the period, between the Romans and the formation of large ethnicity and geography determined national structures. I'm just some biologist, so excuse my rambling, off-topic to me..
Where's Kingdom Come?
Nice video. Would love to help clean up and maybe help. Better view of the maps would be awesome.
You could come down to next Tuesdays lecture and help put the chairs away? But there's no way your touching the O.H.P if that's what you're getting at?
I'm going through this channel's videos and loving it . . . something I've been curious about for some time is why is there an East Anglia but not a West Anglia? Or is West Anglia Mercia? Hopefully someone more informed than me can let me know in these comments
Yes Mercia counts as 'West Anglia'. East Anglia may have been named in distinction from it. Mercia of course means 'borderland: it was where the Angles had a frontier and interface with the Britons.
Also, for a while a Kingdom of Middle Anglia existed in the south of Mercia. I was a vasall of East Anglia when the latter had defeated Mercia for a while.
@@MatthewMcVeagh Newark upon Trent.
my mums side are the Britons
@@grahamfisher5436 ?
I think the angles were the kingdoms with ‘ia ‘ at the end
Tell me you are a teacher without telling me that you are a teacher.
„Well, all of my time pieces indicate me it’s 3:40...“
>demographics
>Ethnic divisions
I like to imagine I'm in that class and and at this point say
"OY VEY OY GEVALT ITS ANUDDA SHOAH"
19:54 so does England mean people of the land ?
@rahjah6958 no, it means 'land of the Engles' (Angles). The Old English spelling, I understand, was 'Englaland'.
Am guessing possibly my Ancestor was Magonsaete then. (Herefordshire). Offa later became King of the Area circa 800 and built the Dyke of course.
Runs very close to Titley. Am going to visit this year! (On a bike).
Theres a place called Titleys knob. (Ref to a lookout?)
See what I can find out. Classic lecture. (I am BA Ancient & Med Hist).
I love history.
and History loves you ❤
Nice. Liked and shared.
For a few personal reasons that I won't get into right now, this stuff is very very helpful. Thank you.. Just wow.
Hengist traditionally sailed to England in 449 and established several sons on thrones over the various divisions of the Anglo-Saxons.
Onlar Hunlardan kaçtılar.😂😂😂😂😂😂
I didn’t know mr Garrison was still giving lectures mmmkay
Did the Picts perceive this "continuity"? Lol...aparently everybody loved the Romans now including all of those who fought against them. Maybe like how Conan loved Thulsa Doom?
Ha Ha well aye there are americans who think the Picts built Hadrian's Wall for the Romans and paid for it lol
@Hammer Go Bonk! Which sources would you cite ? After 210 the Romans stayed out of Caledonia unless they had to. There are sources that tell us the Picts, the Scots and the Saxons joined forces to raid and fight with the Romans, I was told by my pictish historian friend
@@johnmaclagan2263 Do you think the Picts may be remenants of pre Celtic Britian ?
@@blossomjoseph5541 Aye pretty much the Picts are the descendents of the Caledonians, opinions are like arseholes "we all have one"
@@johnmaclagan2263 Are they related to Celts by DNA ?
Extremely interesting
Ironic this is a Turkish Uni. All those Saxon gold and garnet jewels must have been made in the Eastern Empire i.e. Constantinople. They're so similar they may have all come from one shipment. Unlikely, but it wants looking at.
excellent lecture
Thank you very much
Wessex was the first island before Anglo-Saxons
French was the Spoken Language of Britain Rule 400 years ?
"Gewisse" ? Gar Wasser ? Spear folk along the water (Themes) ?
Did the Romans rule the Viking people anywhere?
This is for real like the boring math or science lectures I'd hear, accept actually interesting. XD
Hey dude you use Intro Mate like me
Good video
✝️
🇬🇷.ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ ΑΝΕΣΤΗ.🇬🇷
🇬🇷.ΑΛΗΘΩΣ ΑΝΕΣΤΗ.🇬🇷
✝️
Enjoyable, but the abject lack of knowledge from the students is particularly troubling. Of even the most basic facts of British history they are apparently ignorant.
Maybe some of them know but they're so dominated by imposter syndrome that they hide at the back.
@billysmith7686 It may have something to do with the fact that Bilkent is a 'Turkish' University
@@adiabolicalliberty2614 Yes, I realised this and apologised elsewhere.
Look to post Impireal India for a helpful comparison of continuity and legacies, together with those lost.
Time Team brought me here.
Excellent!!
The South Park "M'kay" !!
Anglo Saxons are in many similar traits whit Kieran Russ in the mideval europe…Given that they were so dominant and that they created wast global empires
Awesome!
Yes exactly what caused the schism.The same thing happened in the east whit the Byzantine traditions…In fact the only reason why greek culture survived is because in the Middle Ages Russians opened many schools and greek was taught in all higher education
Huh?????!
You forgot the ents, goblins of...
King Alfred did not fight the Vikings! He fought the Danes and defeated the Danes. His son and grandson re-conquered Danelaw not 'Vikinglaw'. The term Waelcyn (Viking) does not appear in the Anglo-Saxon chronicles until the early 10thC. It's use in any other time period is incorrect. Vikings appear to have been pirates and opportunists made up of many races - Byzantines, Irish, English, Norse, Danes and many others - they were not a race or tribe of any single people. Just because a term is popular or in common use does not make it correct.
Stop being so pedantic. We all know what he means by the term vikings and how it is interchangeable with Danes. Why is it random CZcams posters feel this need to one up qualified professors who no doubt know a lot more about this period than they do. Being a medieval reenacter doesn't make you an academic.
@@mrdarren1045 Who is a mediaeval re-enactor? I do have a suitable Degree and have been studying this particular period for nearly 50 years. Pedantry would appear to be more of your speciality. If I wished to be pedantic I could pick a lot of holes in this lecture - especially with regard to the use of the word Wealas and the dismissal of leaders of the first arrivals as being unlikely as they were all Fathers and Sons and/or Brothers. Of course, that never happend in history in such a sustained manner. The history of Hannibal and his father and Brothers fighting the Romans is obviously dubious as are the Scipios and as for Edward III and his son at Crecy, not to mention Henry V and his Brothers at Azincourt - preposterous! Interestingly, listened to another lecture about that Italian guy Caesar, who invaded France and conquered it and in 55 and 54 BC invaded England and fought the English before retiring to France and having a few more battles aginst the French and Belgians. Not quite right, but we all know who I mean. Don't you?
It’s actually pronounce Eathal
soooo many empty “legendary “ centuries... i hope one day our historians will find the courage to condense Saligarian Chronology as it should be per Fomenko and Heinsohn... also Comyns Beaumont will be critical to GB in reestablishing their true history and heritage... God bless :)
Owen W that sounds like a a response from someone who has studied a bit and thinks they know a lot. Fomenko is undoubtably on to something... his work is immense, precise, and far reaching... what he proposes in some instances pushes his evidence too far... but the avalanche of evidence he presents speaks for itself... and THAT is already gob-smacking. Scaligarian history is a complete fraud... and any serious historian has to admit to this if they have any integrity. a flip comment like yours betrays a lack of any serious investigation in the subject... hit the books with diligence and an open mind and come back in two years with a comment worth my time.
Owen W well i can see you are well read... you have my apologies... i think we can agree that his ultimate conclusions push the evidence too far... i’m an engineer familiar with probability methods... and can understand your reservations on his selectivity... all that said... his EVIDENCE nonetheless still speak volumes. the proliferation of the i(date)ing evidence... the phantom and repeating kingships... the astronomical evidence (which is much more than fancy footwork)... latin literature that is internally inconsistent... the secrecy and coverups in the Vatican, protecting and promoting their own power structures... look... i’ve read nearly 300 academic books on the matter and have made ancient history, mythology, astronomy, astrology, catastrophism, etc... my life’s work... i too agreed Fomenko’s many conclusions are off... but i am ever grateful to his dedication in assembling his extraordinary evidence. i welcome his work as addition to many other lines of evidence. i am 100% certain that Scaligarian chronology is a fraud... and that it is accepted as fundamentally true and the foundation for modern historians? this handicaps the whole of historical academia... they are utterly incapable of moving beyond such an encompassing fraud... whole careers would be dismantled... whole fields... its a catastrophe in itself.
look at the pyramids around the globe... historians are at a complete loss to explain them... they know nearly nothing. it’s a travesty.
God bless you dear seeker.
For some reason modern "historians" find it impossible to believe that a period so drenched in magic could actually have happened.
prehistoric tuna that’s a very insightful point... let’s just say... in a world literally glittering in electrical fire... as would be the case with a galactic center and/or solar flare... the “magic” you speak of would be everywhere on earth.... and harnessing it, while it lasted over several centuries, would be the bread and butter of all concurrent priests, engineers and kings. THAT is our true history.
John Ashtone what rapier sharp wit!
you know... Socrates opined that wisdom begins when we realize how little we truly know... and that can only happen after many decades of earnest research and discovery... in this case its more than most mortals have time for while earning a living and providing for a family. only the rarest few can become educated and study enough to begin to sort this out... while many foolish graduates think their diplomas qualify them to espouse weighty opinions... when they’ve only just scratched the thinnest surface of the dogma they are fed. true history takes much more than being well read in the victors’ stories... but then... i am preaching to the choir here aren’t i? i’m obviously in the presence of an intellectual giant... wherefore in this conversation at least, i will gracefully bow and take my leave.
These Anglo's do not go back to living as they were before the Roman Invasion, and that is the unrecognized tragedy!!
The world that existed pre claudian invasion, didn't exist any more! Then the power vacuums after the legions withdrew 410AD sucked in other userpers. In the end, the Welsh are the real British
Because of tribal warfare for leadership the country fell into anarchy
I had bad constapaition in thouse days lol and steel do today lolz . Dark times indeed . dare to be wise ?!. 💯
All the sources this professor says are lacking can be found in Wilson & Blackett's books and the charters of Llandaff. This period was not dark at all.
I took the time to follow up on your informal citation. Its rubbish; they're charlatans.
@@j.d.snyder4466 Shows how much you know, which is not much at all. All their work is verified. They are not charlatans at all.
rhythmstic: thank you for sharing your opinion. I would just note that you failed to cite a single solitary thing to support your opinion. I'm open to learning; my cursory online review, however, didn't turn up anything that supports your assertion.
@@j.d.snyder4466 Not being aware of, or choosing to ignore, the verified researches of W&B, is simply your loss.
Feel grateful I took the time to mention it.
rhythmstic: ah, yes, you reminded me that we live in an era of fantasy bubbles. Fancy your fantasy, after all, it's free.
hahahah i studied at bilkent for a time. i did not know he was a notable professor
Awesome BRITISH POSH ACCENT Aye Gov!! 💂👸😻👳🤗
So basically a fake accent developed in the industrial revolution.
it's actually Welsh
His accent is hardly posh. Although I'm pretty sure he's of welsh origin his accent is basically bog standard home counties RP. there is a difference between speaking posh and just speaking clearly. And there's nothing posh or snooty about his accent. He's just clear and well spoken.
And there's no such thing as a 'British accent'. There are literally hundreds of accents in Britain. Welsh Scottish and English accents are totally different and then within England alone there are countless regional accents.
His accent isn't welsh at all. He may be welsh but he hasn't got a welsh accent. This is just a standard RP English accent.
The vikings appeared in 800 ac in england
you were wrong right from the start . Your politics are merely a narrow English language view of history . If you had read the Welsh historical record then you would no longer talk in terms of post Roman , pre- viking periods , but you would have to include Cymric rule over the whole of Britain , but the only thing that matters in the history allowed by the English monarchy is that which concentrates on the English invasions .
First comment and great vid
Glad you enjoyed it! I liked it as well! And yes you are the first to comment! Thus earning your comment a like and a heart! Thanks for your support!
@@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449 no worries man
without celts and mediterreaneans englad would be just as boring as denmark...
He left out King Arthur
Such lecture must be a shock for an English the same relate to OE
@NIkola Vukicevic I'm afraid there were no Germans both in Britain and on the continent . Surely You wouldn't meet any circa 6 till late 9 century AD.
@NIkola Vukicevic All those tribes settled in England, not 1 of these tribes settled in Scotland, ye Ken the top half of Britain.
@@arturwojciechowicz3124 they don't mean Germans in the modern sense of the German nation. They mean 'Germanic'. Germanic peoples were written about in the roman period.
@@johnmaclagan2263 if youd even been to Scotland you'd know why.
@@mrdarren1045 aye, only the Scots can deal with the weather
Do many Saxons know how to play the saxophone?
No. We play the banjo, eya eya eya o eya o eya o eya eya eya o eya eya o.
Onkay?
21:41 in the middle of anatolia and nobody knows any greek. sad, sad.......!
I found out my ancestry goes back to 330A.D
Like an explosion in a facts shop. How are students supposed to follow something with such a weak narrative thread.
They left out Middlesex surrey
Way too much introduction I have up