Could US military invade Russia if it wanted to? (2020)
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 07. 2024
- Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile:
💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/8f6c32f2
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
This video talks about US and Russian military power in a head to head comparison. What would it take for US to actually invade Russian mainland? Could the US reach Ukraine, for example, if no other country interfered or helped? How would the real world geography and climate shape such a war?
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
Images used in thumbnail:
Joe Biden image by Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Vladimir Putin image by Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
MRL launcher images by www.mil.ru, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
Go to / binkov if you want to help support our channel. And enjoy the perks such as get access to our videos with no ads, participate in monthly polls deciding which topics we'll make into videos and get early access to various content.
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile:
💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/8f6c32f2
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
I already play it. I guess it's pretty good. Unfortunately i this game is EXTREMELY p2w but luckily, there's only small amount of whales in the playerbase so you're probably not gonna encounter them much.
Reminds me of Call of Duty MW
How about arab league vs israel
Best guess about half the United States side with the Russians, you guys seem to have freer and fairer elections
Top
"let's just say, hypothetically, Ukraine splits and Russia takes half"
Well sir, it seems like Russia wants the full thing. Not half
Ukraine takes everything and Russia pays reparations.
@Brett Rose you misspelt "Fascists'"
@@TheBloodRedDane you mispelt liberators
@@coajdka you spelt monsters wrong
@@coajdka Liberators? They liberate Ukrainians against their will?
You should do small countries fighting eachother like Vatican city vs Luxembourg
They're the 189! 🎶
Luxembourg would win
@@poppy63765 mabye but the Vatican is in Italy so Luxembourg would be hard pressed to invade Italy
Or the Vatican vs. San Marino.
@@poppy63765 The Vatican has got the Swiss Guard; heavily armed with pikes and broad swords.
We know now that Binkov definitely overstated the effectiveness of the Russian Airforce here.
Common theme 🙄
So did everyone else at the time.
@@spartenkiller456I don't even think he overstated it. Fighting against aircraft supported by your own IADS and AWACS is a lot different than what is happening in Ukraine.
@@voidtempering8700 Russia has both of those things and the third largest air Force in the world, too bad none of it works as advertised. Oh well, sucks to suck I guess.
Lol it’s hilarious how back in the day we actually treated Russian army inwardly as a serious threat
still ARE
@@jaycentoret2866 perhaps to the Balkans and Central Europe, the only concern is their rocketry and artillery. We simply have to secure the aerospace, apply air radars and anti air defenses
@@antonifondupencat2578 well thats treu but i think russia has advantage in combat experiance in ukraine
@@jaycentoret2866 their combat experience in Ukraine is quintessentially dying and failing. The Wagner group faced no opposition when driving toward Moscow, heck, the Russian troops even praised them. If indicates how weak Russia actually is, and the arbitrary regime is under threat
@@antonifondupencat2578 i dislike putin but i think russian and ukrainian army are the only with lange scala war experience
I've played Conflict of Nations, it takes a lot of your time and is 100% pay to win.
Couldn't agree more
@@martimsalvador9186 call of war is better
It's pretty doable without money if you play on the Flashpoint map (just Europe and parts of North America and Africa), as there are less players per game making it less likely to run into one of the pay-to-winners. My strategy is mainly to spam mechanized infantry and blitzkrieg surrounding countries one by one. If someone is spending money it's usually pretty easy to notice when they effortlessly 5v1 or something, at which point I just leave immediately.
It's an extremely stressful game either way though, since at any time someone near you could completely screw you over while you're gone.
@@Sahd079 they are pretty similar. I dont like this type of games. They are stressful
In Supremacy 1914, a similar game, I use a second account and VPN to buff my nation at the start of each game to get ahead of the pay 2 win retards. Works every time.
Expectation: Modern Warfare 1-2
Reality: Fallout Series
Stupidest stories were 2 and 3 in that entire series
More like Metro 2033 series
Me and the boys in the trench right before the Russians drop a nuke on us:
*I T S A L L OVER*
@@paprikaa117 don't r/woooosh me but I'm pretty sure the radiation could still reach you in a trench
This aged like fine milk
Did it though? US still couldn't invade given these conditions, it needs a land border
@@Prometheus7272 which is all of western Europe basically
@Kyodai Riker Yes the video is stupid nonetheless accurate given the premise.
I think this aged cos I listen to propaganda that told me there's never Ukrainian losses
@@kyodairikerit still can't tho, Russia is a nuclear power which can obliterate USA
“The reason for such an unlikely event would be unrealistic” that aged poorly.
Why can't we all just get along 😭
Napoleon and Hitler say "Don't do it!".
genghis khan: why not?
Exactly, Obama tried it. Never worked over Crimea
@@negan5374 your fledgling authortian of a leader annexed a free democratic city into his empire, and Barack obama did nothing about it. He was a panzy, and if we had better leadership crimea would still be free and people would have needlessly not have died.
@@ClarityPCGaming Crime is a free,but as your historiy is only 200 years old,I dond aspect you to understand that. And what Barak could do about it,if he wanted,to kill a Rusian solder? Worst mistake he could do.
Don't invade russia
My final message
Short answer: NO
Long answer: Just NO...
Imaginery answer No
obvious answer hell no
brutal answer fuck no
friendly answer hahahaha no
racist answer yankees no
@Република Српска Крајина Afghanistan ran Russia out of their country in 3 years. America can & will stay there as long as we wish too.
@@gregcreek5715 Lol 10 years not 3 years.
@Chris T Not anymore, son.
This fight would be suicide for both countries as well as all life on earth
This aged well
Everybody gangsta until the revive button appears in Marshall Zhukov's grave
Lmao
SERVE ME WASHINGTON ON A PLATE
Zhukov ain't got shit on General Schwarzkopf!!!!!
@@johngarrand645 that sounds like a German name
So, USA will need to sacrifice half of his army to take Kamchatka. lol
US be like: I've won but at what cost 😂
@@sidharthakumar8563 Kamchatka: Do you see torpedo boats?!
Kamchatka: trade offert!you recive Kamchatka I recive:half of your army
and russia would lose it's entire army losing Kamchatka. LOL
@@keke3441 not according to the video, keep crying.
The germans tried..frenchies napoleon tried...maybe the U.S got the Avengers supporting them🤣🤣🤣
I think its time to redo this video as the assumptions about Russia no longer apply
I think binkov is probably right assuming Russia stragically and sensibly uses their forces.... But Russia will probably just throw their troops at the enemy blindly instead😂
USA and Russia after the war: Thats it, we did it lads, our populations are no more !
@@-Raff- pretty sure the n-word but poorly sensored
@@spectre9078 thats what i thought lmao
@かたわれ時 everyone: thats it lads, we are all fucked !
@@-Raff- haha have a good time being suspended after I reported you like 40 times for supporting racism and making death threats to me just because I have a picture of some dude who didnt even kill himself awwww kid with 2 moms haha
@@spectre9078 its actually censored you cant spell so who's Brian is poorly censored right now
The US: It will work this time I promise
Sweden, France, and Germany: Are you sure about that?
Mongols, tatars, poles: yes
@@mint8648 The examples you listed are from further in the past when Russia was waaay smaller and weaker. The OP's examples are more relevant.
Poles? Are you referring to the Polish Muscovite War? If yes, the Poles were forced out of Russia after their king pissed of the Russians.
@@captaindak5119 ok but the poles held the title of czar for two years and the mongols conquered every russian state. also the germans in ww1 invaded russia successfully
@Dimitry Chernoff no they won’t using nukes is not within any nation’s self-interest
@Dimitry Chernoff they’ll just retaliate, making russia’s situation even worse
Watching this in 2022 be like:hey guys,Is this thing on live?
If the people of Russia all decided to vote for U.S. statehood, the U.S. would be crazy to even entertain the thought. The U.S. has almost no use for Russia, the oil would be nice, but the headache wouldn't be worth it.
Plus congress would almost definitely veto it
@@softdrink-0 I don't know, what is their population compared to our current territories? A lot of them would enter as blue or purple or even swing states, while Russia would likely balance it with several red states (we'd of course break them apart for easier governance, probably roughly into their current internal borders). Historically, states have entered in groups to balance expected voting blocks. Bringing Russians in could be the key to getting Puerto Rico admitted, finally.
You are right, why should the USA invade a corrupt 3rd world country?
@@augusto8821 ......Absolutely! If we want the cheap thrill of corruption, just join the Republican party!!!
I mean, technically they can, the success rate is probably 0% though, meaning they'd end up nuking each other.
Even without nukes succes rate still 0 %
People don't escalate to nuclear just because they fail their objective by conventional arms. See vietnam and afghanistan
There could be a cold war between them but not a fight against each other... They will end up killing all living things in the Earth
@@johnnybc1520 bruh neither Vietnam nor Afghanistan had nukes themselves. Assymetrical wars cannot compare to straight up wars with another superpower.
@@MikoyanGurevichMiG21 see Korean war
Alternate History: Poland and Czechoslovakia vs Germany(1938)
Interesting, maybe winnable without Russia getting involved.
Germany would probably win, Germany was pretty militarized by then.
And in our timeline the Germans had already crushed Poland by the time the soviets invaded, so in this world Germany could probably have blitzed through Poland and Czechoslovakia.
@@wartrix6046 The allience would definitely be the underdog, but I dont think its out of the question.
Germany would still win but have a harder time. Also is this before or after the Sudetenland being annexed or does it happen at all? Good idea for a video either way😁
What about modern Czechoslovakia vs nazi Germany?
Edit: As in modern Czech and Slovakia together as one nation and military combined against Germany in late 30s, just like in one of those fun modern Poland vs germany and ussr alternative videos in this channel
Go look up binkov's video about modern Poland army owning the Germans in ww2
Key words: If we wanted too?
Answer: NO
So, barring nuclear weapons I'm thinking the answer is now yes.
Yes but the U.S. would have all of N.A.T.O. and their allies and given Russia’s poor military performance in Ukraine, a N.A.T.O. victory is more likely. Also the U.S. didn’t lose to the militaries of Iraq and Afghanistan they lost to an insurgency. However in the case of Russia it would determine how loyal the people are to Putin.
@Mile Hoho there is a difference between defeating and occupying. Britisher defeated our maharaja and freedom fighting forces but we still won after 100 years of occupation.
@@prasunkumar117 your ‘war’ was won by Germans and Japanese.
@@garrettfulks2932 US Alone can do it.
The thought of the US invading Russia and vice versa is just unthinkable.
How about now
@@sebastianbratu1502 It's possible. But not doable.
@@sebastianbratu1502 It wouldn't be worth the death toll.
@@arrowup8711 nice brand, arrow
Operation unthinkable
Q: Can USA invade Russia ?
A: One lesson that history has taught us is that you don’t.
Napoleon and Hitler: Good Question. Its no!
Usa was thinking they can change not legal in Ukraine government and make military base in Crimea but Russia became winer .
Everyone: No one has successfully invaded Russia
German empire: *sighs, forgotten to history*
Can you invade us oil plants
One lesson in 2018 has taught us is you cant 😒🇺🇲🥇
Nobody wants a land war in Eurasia.
This didn’t age well.
so true!
The irony of the opening of this video compared to what is happening today is frightening
I love how most of the comments are bias preferences and most don’t even make sense. Hell I’ve seen the same people argue in different comments over it. It’s a hypothetical scenario, no nukes, no allies you don’t need to get all defensive over it.
Amen. Jingoism runs high in both the Russian Federation and the USA; compounded by the sour-grape aroma wafting from sh-t-hole dwelling, anti-American sore losers.
@Dimitry Chernoff Careful what you wish for. If America doesn't retaliate and destroy all human life, we might just mutate from the nuclear fallout into star-spangled X-men and subsequently conquer Russia with our new-found super-powers.
@Dimitry Chernoff Missiles dont appear out of thin air... Russia needs to produce them, they're expensive. In ICBM numbers the US has more. Its not going to matter tho the world will get destroyed regardless lol.
@Dimitry Chernoff no they won’t only in the most dire of circumstances in fact
I will be bold enough to say there will never be a war that is comparable to ww2 in a very long time due to nuclear weapons
The shear fact that nukes can level entire nations keeps major powers from fighting each other
Hell if it wasn’t for the atomic bombs dropped on Japan
The Soviets would have probably try to take all of Europe after they reached Berlin
Either that or another war on the scale of ww3 probably would have already happened
Nuclear weapons are double edged swords on one hand.
They can Destroy our entire planet
On the other hand they keep major conflicts like world wars from ever happening again
@@Jshehejsehsh Turkish Army vs Greek Army Military Comparision
czcams.com/video/yUMnF1-kKfE/video.html
"... that is what NATO is for......"
What ?
NATO is meant to be a defense pact.
If the US decides to attack Russia, NATO will sit on it's hands and do nothing.
NATO becomes involved, when Russia would attack the US, attack one = attack all.
The premises of the vid is that Russia takes half of Ukrain, well Ukrain is not part of NATO, NATO does not automatically become involved.
So stating " that is what NATO is for" is just not correct.
NATO is a "defensive pact," but realistically speaking I don't think there's any way NATO (or the EU) would sit on their hands if Russia invades Eastern Ukraine. Remember that NATO intervened in the Kosovo War and the Bosnian War. NATO might claim to be a purely defensive pact, but they would react in this case. Russia knows this obviously, so they aren't invading half of Ukraine right now.
@@kennywang1707 lol bro i have a news for you
Russia already occupied 1/4 of Ukraine.
And what eu do with it ? Just useless sanctions and useless speechs .
@@lagamiyaight7581 Yup, Russia calculated that they could go for Crimea and apparently it worked out for them. However, it's apparent that they aren't doing it again for the rest of Ukraine, for good reason.
Looking back at this with 2022 eyes is amazing.
American could not not invade Russia, just like Russia could not invade America.
We would all lose
U.S.A vs Russia. That would be a fight for the ages.
More like a fight to reboot the stone age.
@@Grenadier311 I can agree with that.
Would be like the great mushroom war of adventure time
No it will be the end of rhe world.
white supremacist vs white friends
Yes they can but only in dreams and Hollywood movies
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Awww are the American haters coming out 🧻 here these are for your tears 😢
I mean I get it if I spent a century trying to catch up to someone and they still beat me I would be salty too but I don't know what that's like
@@austinlowrance5943 easy there uncle Sam, real world isn't Rambo 3 😆
@@arismaiden6457 America 6000 nukes everyone else not even close there is only one super power. These countries wouldn’t stand a chance
That lil ukrane part looking real plausible rn
U.S. Military would have to create a tractor division, but it should't be that hard...
Short answer: no one can successfully invade russia, haven't we learned from history? 😂
@Your Majesty, no... it shows that they would get bogged down and not win..
What video are you watching?
@Your Majesty, did the mongols conquer all of russia? No? Ok then.
@@guessthatsitthen4982 They did succeed in reducing the Russian principalities to vassal states, but Muscovy had the last laugh.
Because they invaded from the wrong side
Lol and what about Russian mercs trying to invade a us oil plant 3 years ago
That seem fair 😏
Fun fact! Russia has defeat Russia more than any other country.
Your saying the cold war
Да
So true!
Fun fact Russia defeated usa twice even with back up ,
1. NK
2. at the Russian border but then ran away.
@@irondeed5225 Russia never sent troops to NK
Poles & Lithuanians: Good luck
Napoleon: Ok
Hitler: lol
Poles want to attack and I am pretty sure the Lithuanians want to as well. Napolean didnt know, Hitler attacked to late, and we live in modern times with logistics and heaters and cool shit like that.
I usually watch all the videos all the way thru but come on we wouldn’t use any of our bases in NATO countries ? As soon as I heard that I was like yup not even going to watch the rest of this one. Plus #2 ranked Russia in military might is getting smacked up by the #22 ranked Ukraine. America has also a lot more combat experience and far superior technology than the Ukrainian military. I think the USA, British or German’s would dog walk the Russian’s. However it would also depend on each country’s objective.
The United States has even been defeated by small countries like Vietnam and Afghanistan, and you can't compare that way
@@qingyoung9057 they will lose if they stay and occupy russia, but first the US will decimate the russian military.
“Can [insert country here] win a ground war in Russia?”
Spoilers: no
Same goes for China and the United States.
@Die_Hard_Diesel The countries with enough population to challenge USA in ground war are across ocean, so it will be a nightmare of logistics
@@alanfriesen9837 agreed. Any country that big creates untenable supply lines and the vastness of land mass makes occupation impossible.
@Doglover extrem yea Mor Than 9 contry vs 1 yea
@Doglover extrem yea napoleon and Hitler Both thought they were stronger but we let them fail :)
Absolutely no reason for a war with Russia.
No but that’s not what this video is about, and that’s why he said it himself.
Hypothetical scenario
@Ventura Don’t worry, Slow Joe will find a reason
No good, sane reasons not counterintuitive.
@@BigRW @R W Yep. We're at 8 percent of the world's population now, down from 25 just before wwI, as you may know, counting actual European Whites and not generic Caucasians.
I unloaded on this moron last night whining about White Supremacy. Informed the bigot that it's the wealthy who run the world, not the race they're selling out, and that we're being replaced, not empowered, by oligarchs and other so-called elites who favor brown for green.
I did my part and had a fair-haired child. Now, it's up to me convince her to keep the line pure; battling negative influences from her in-law family and grandmother who cross over and actively undermine the endeavor with real prejudice against me.
It's not about bigotry anymore. It's a matter of survival.
Be healthy.
Fascinating Analysis. Thank You!
Very nice presentation .💯👌thanks.
It's funny how people call Binkov both "Russian propaganda" and "American propaganda" at the same time.
I think he actually tries to to be fair when he does these.
But the Russian propaganda is winning in the comments
Russian troll will take notice in a while just ignore then they have bad day eveyday
Invading Russia, sounds fun, until you hear your grandpa talking about how it went...
German grandpa?
My grandad said going up Normandy beach in a tank was scary as Fuck. Still got to meet the Soviets in Berlin tho.
@@tylee8055 Jep
@@christianohkler1905 Those amphibious Shermans were more scary. Most of them sank and there was no way out.
@@jonhart7630 Well "amphibious"... Can't really argue with that, I think its hard to compare these things. But it's a sarcastic joke about the thing's I can listen to when my Grandpa talks so..
hmmmmm that didn't age well
As soon as Putin saw an invasion force coming I think he would fire a flurry of nukes
That would make it easier for NATO tbh. NATO revealed recently, they can easily nuke Moscow under 60 seconds
@@choonblaze not they can’t they weak
@@cesarsaldana8640 Russia launches 1 nuke, and they no longer exist as a nation. They have nukes pointed at them from every direction of the globe.
Do US 1980 vs US 2020 hypothetical war.
1980 defo win
No half the people would side with the 80s
Where would that even take place?
For real. We're still using a lot of the same equipment but now we have a lot less of it. DO IT
@@xeji4348 One USA on one side of the Atlantic and one USA on the other, but with the east coast where the west coast is
try it! Hitler and Napoleon have previously tried
Though, they lacked the technology we have today... And they also didn't outnumber Russia's entire military 2-to-1, and have twice as much populace.
@@MrJinglejanglejingle the Hitlers generals had same thought...
@@andrewlvov5535 Not particularly, no. Similar thoughts? Yes. Backed up by incorrect info? Indeed.
However, technology these days is... A smattering more accurate than back then, wouldn't you say, chum?
@@MrJinglejanglejingle for a mass war, and the conflict between Russia and the United States will be like this, the accuracy of technology will not play anyl role.
Russia is not Iraq or Libya.
About the losses of the USSR during the war. You probably don't know that out of 27 million direct losses, the military is only 9-10 million, the remaining 17-18 million are civilians who perished, tortured to death in concentration camps, who died of hunger, burned by retreating Wehrmacht units, bombed by the Luftwaffe. Moreover, the direct military losses of Germany are also estimated at 8-9 million soldiers, these losses do not include the allies, SS troops and SS legions. Something like this. the ratio of 2 to 1 is a myth of the Cold War and losing wermacht generals. In Russia says about it - a bad dancer always blames his balls
@@MrJinglejanglejingle Operation Barbarossa where Germans at 5.2 million initially outnumbered 2 million Soviet defenders. It took a year before Soviets outnumbered Germans.
Based on the Performance of the Russian navy in the war in Ukraine. I doubt there will be that much us air and sea losses.
them I dare the US to enter Russia 😂
@@yawokyere8416 Don't think the US could hold Russia or china but it would definitely destroy both of those air forces and navies.
The United States will never attack another country to expand. We are content with our own country away from everyone else. We do attack other country's who threaten freedom and peace weather it be terrorists or some shit dictator.
@@yawokyere8416 oh we will soon little doggy 🤣
😂😂🙀🙀😂😂😂😂😂😂, Both USA and Russia know each other weakness
So don't expect anything like America attacking Russia that even Hitler failed and Napoleon
Russia is strong enough
aged like milk at 1000x speed
US invade Russian.
Napoleon and Axis Germany: They learn nothing.
Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defectors Final Target Invasion /Final Invasion Target Operation Downfall 2:57 3:06 3:13 3:48 4:31 4:48 4:58 5:56.6:00 6:12 6:18 6:29 7:04 7:43 8:02 8:12 8:30 8:56-9:02 9:14-9:19-9:27 9:39-9:41-9:45-,:48-9:57-9:59 10:01-10:04-10:07-10:13-10:18-10:26-10:38-10:44,10:47-10:51-10:57-11:01-11:14,11:19-11:23-11:26-11:30-11:43,11:45,11:47-11:55-11:58-12:02-12:20-12:33-12:46-13:13,13:21,13:38,13:48,13:53,13:56,14:03,14:10,14:16,14:25,14:33-14:38,14:46,14:52,14:55-14:59-15:08-15:16-15:29-15:40,15:43,15:53,16:15,16:18,16:34,16:37,16:43,16:54,16:55,17:09,17:14,17:18,17:22,17:25,18:11
America can't invade Russia. Russia also can't invade America. They're just too good for each other.
Same with china at this point. The 3 just cant feasibly "win" a war
China knows that and that's why they will do whatever the hell they want in the seas nearby because they're aware we cant actually do anything but complain
Stupide : take time but nothing impossible.
@@jblob5764 but a war in third country or 3 battleground . The US will win . For example in South China sea
@@justicethedoggo3648 no we won’t
@@jblob5764 exept russia and the US are very much self supported with food and fuel, China not so much. So a blockade can slowly starve them. Although they are trying to change this.
This is just a bad idea, the reason why hitler failed in WW2 betrayed Russia and tried invading Russia and lost bout 2 million troops, and you can also read napoleon attempt as wel
Yikes, this didn't age well...
Technically it just further illiterates how many eyes were on the region for such a potential
To be fair, Russians would probably do alot better defending their own territory from invaders.
@@Cockatoofan666
True, but if their Commanders are stupid enough to barracks their troops right on top of a ammo dump.....wellllllll.
You think the US could conquer Russia?😂
Napoleon and Hitler in the background:
“Don’t”
Dont forget swedish empire
To be fair Napoleon made it but didn't fully consider...ok...What now?
@@felixgutierrez993 true. He did conquer moscow, but the Russian government had a scorched earth policy in place so his troops could not live off the land and quickly attack the enemy.
@@mgastudios5076 and all they did was retreat and fortify napoleons #1 weakness
I'm sure none of these comments will be controversial and/or rife with machismo nationalism.
Cumbayadala cumbuya.
In short, sure. A longer answer might ask why. Russia is large, muddy, cold and without redeeming qualities and is scheduled to decompose in a decade.
Decompose in a decade? LOLOLOL! Well according to Al Gore the US will be underwater but that hasn't stopped Obama from buying a seaside mansion!
@@TheFinnmacool What are you trying so unsuccessfully to say? Is there a gem of understanding in your random disputable statement?
I want an up to date version of this video
The next war you should simulate should be the coming American Civil War.
All liberals dead before lunch. A 10 second episode wouldn't be very popular.
Liberals will die from soy overconsumption
Biden could just challenge Putin to a push-up contest XD
@Lightning Kaiser that's why it'd be so funny
@@makeromaniagreatagain9697 bruh
Plank
Hehe. We should go back to the days when our leaders sent champions to decide the day in single combat. Should we send Chuck Norris's clone from his 80's DNA sample or Butterbean into the fray?
@Alpha it's a meme
Great vids bro keep up the good work
Ah yes the hypothetical scenario where Russia officially deploys troops into eastern Ukraine
Ha ha that’s so crazy that’d never happen
Next video should be NATO vs Russia, China, and North Korea
It's already was in Vietnam - NATO sucks :)
Don't even think about it. Lets all be friends :)
0:23 Binkov' crystal ball never disappoints
Lol one year later, here we are watching the conflict in Ukraine unfold… what’s next.
Spoiler alert: Taiwan
Russia is big, there is a lot of land, there is enough space for everyone. We are not greedy, we will allocate each participant in the attack a plot of 2 meters in length, 1 meter in width and 2 meters in depth. Welcome, aggressors))
If america will invade russia it should only invade those near us allies and capture cities that it could hold
America has the industry based power the knowledge and the manpower something Germany nevered had . Imagine if Germany had the b17
Hah! I like your style and admire your pluck, Ruskie. Peace and good will from Texas.
@@Grenadier311 And to you wishes of peace from us. We ordinary people have nothing to share. Greetings from the Caucasus
@@davidpadilla9468 Germany invaded Russia with 3 million men. America would never get an army that size to invade Russia. Genghis Khan is the only Aggressor to conquer Russia and he conquered the other 2 world powers at the same time: China and Persia.
The Mongols,French and Germans(twice)had tried to conquer Russia ,and when the wars seemed to be lost for Russia,it always ends up winning.
Germany would have if the west didn’t attack them
@@Sean-yk8he I don't have any doubt that you're American, you just have 0 knowledges about history...
@@Sean-yk8he USSR take down Germany almost by themselves they didn't wait the "Braves" americans... UK was not able to attack Germany (except with no consequences raids) and USA arrived very lately they was too busy against Japan, Ussr arrived in Germany (I don't talk about berlin) even before that usa arrived in France from England...
@@damir7768 The Soviets could not have withstood the full weight of the German war machine by themselves. German military power was diluted by fighting in North Africa and in western Europe. A concentration of Germany’s resources entirely devoted defeating the Soviets would have won the war in the east.
German armored / mobile units often surrounded Red Armies but couldn’t prevent their escape due to a lack of men to seal the huge battlefield areas. More manpower for the Wehrmacht would have solved this problem.
The early success of Barbarossa caused a food shortage in the USSR.
The Soviets also lacked the production capacity to manufacture trucks they desperately needed. Without trucks they couldn’t move artillery.
The Allies of the USSR made up the shortages the Soviets were experiencing
The US and the United Kingdom shipped massive amounts of ammo, food, communications equipment and trucks to the Soviets.
Below is an answer I’m recycling that touched on this subject.
Germany would have won WW2 if Britain accepted Hitler’s generous peace terms. Peace with the British would have allowed Hitler to become the master of Europe. The British upper class supported Hitler and certain politicians felt it wasn’t worth “Dying for Danzig”. Churchill resisted this heavy pressure.
A settlement would have granted Hitler a free hand in the East.
He would have won his war against the Soviets due to the elimination of major problems before Barbarossa commenced. Problems solved by a Anglo / German peace include:
No Western Front would exist to drain men, arms, fuel and industrial production including for the coastal fortifications and guns. 1,900,000 Wehrmacht served on the Western Front at “peak deployment ”. These troops would have been released to the Eastern Front.
Total German losses on the western front between 1944-1945: 263,000 - 655,000 killed - 400,000 wounded - 4,209,840 captured. 5,000,000 additional German troops would have faced the Soviets. It’s unlikely the Soviets could withstand the weigh of this massive deployment.
]The entire Wehrmacht plus their equipment and weapons would have been deployed in Operation Barbarossa. This would include the 1,977 planes lost in the Battle of Britain.
The British would have supplied oil and fuel as part of the settlement. The oil fields of Romania would have escaped Allied bombing. Germany’s chronic oil shortage would have been eased or solved.
No lend Lease war material would have been shipped to Stalin. The USSR’s shortage of ammo, communication equipment, trucks, food and weapons wouldn’t have been overcome. The US supplied 375,000 trucks alone. Total trucks including from Britain: 450,000.
With Britain out of the war Hitler would not have declared war on the US as an inducement for Japan to enter the war. Hitler stated “the Americans are in this war already attacking our ships and suppling our enemies”. With the U.K at peace President Roosevelt would not have had reason to involve America in another European war defending the USSR.
The war in North Africa would not have occurred. The Germans lost hundreds of thousands of men, 2,500 tanks, 8,000 aircraft, 70,000 trucks and 2,400,000 tons of supplies plus millions of tons of fuel. More German troops were captured in North Africa than at Stalingrad.
The full weight of the American economy and manpower (130,000,000 population) would not have been deployed against Germany. This means no US bombers striking Germany military production and synthetic fuel plants.
Based on the numbers above the Soviets could not win WW2 alone.
@@Sean-yk8he Do not forget that USSR wasn't prepared for war. They even had armistice with German and were supplying oil.
Who tf wouldve guessed their own ally would be crazy, or maybe stupid enough to attack them suddenly like that.
USSR power were also spreaded at that time because of its worry against japan near manchuria. In short, German almost got moscow simply because they betrayed their unsuspecting ally, the unprepared USSR. When USSR finally got hold of the situation, they literally beat the german ass in every battle straight up to Berlin, and USSR havent even begun their war industralization yet.
On the other hand, german have been preparing since Hitler is in power, and they also got alot of tanks, planes, and supply because of France's surrender.
If it were 1 on 1 since the beginning, or USSR had expected war between each other, placed their army in the western part of the country. The german wouldnt even get near Moscow in the first place.
This video aged poorly
Yet again, its 2020, not 2022
Don't forget Alaska is 80Km from Russia, it's a lot easier to invade Russia than what people think.
Yes but that’s the eastern front of Russia which is basically useless, everything that matters is western Russia and they would have to cross the county to get there from the east which is too far
USA: RELEASE THE FLORIDA MAN!!!
Russia: The WHAT?!?
Russia: RELEASE THE STALINGRAD MAN!!!
Florida mans high on pcp armed with gators god help us all.
Stalingrad man strong smart
God,Christus and Maria help only human's
God save Europa
@Mario Orellana Putin: take it
Russian Citizens: thank's for the 634.000 T34
BFG devision plays
The Russian people haven't even fully conquered Russia... Seriously there are still places to explore there, in vast Siberia.
@Dimitry Chernoff has☆ 8,000 missiles, Ivan. Russia isn't entirely composed of missiles, is she? That's like saying that America is 10,000 McDonald's, meaning that that fast food restaurants are the sum total of our existence.
There's at least a few large bears, some pretty women and half a hundred million vodka chugging drunkards there too, right?
@@Grenadier311
For your information, in Russia they drink less than, for example, in Germany or France! It's a myth that we're all alcoholics. In Russia, many people do not drink at all, me for example.
P.S. - I understand that you said this in jest, but since this topic is often joked about, I will post this link here:
www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/05/09/where-global-alcohol-consumption-is-rising-falling-infographic/?sh=4f64aac416e4
@@user-ox3bp4rz3n Yeah, I was joking and giving Mr. Missiles a hard time because he was aiming them at my country. I did read, to my surprise, some time ago that Russians weren't even in the top 10 of nations in terms of alcohol consumption per capita. Perhaps I shouldn't indulge in proliferating stereotypes when I know that they aren't precisely accurate.
That being said, I respect and admire the Russian people, aside from the trolls who persistently trash my country. It's still a post cold-war battle for hearts and minds, of course.
I hope that someday soon we can overcome the divide tptb have erected between us. We have more in common than we differ, I believe, especially when measured against non-European founded nations.
Peace, and be healthy.
@@Grenadier311 Hello, Grenadier 22!)
The Russians are good to the American people.
We have conflicts with the government ... and it's not for nothing. Yesterday I left here very detailed information about US policy.
But these are big comments, if you're interested, I can copy them here so you can understand what's going on in terms of Russian thinking. But this can be said to be an article, in terms of volume. If you're interested, I'll send you an answer.
@@Grenadier311 The Modern Western propaganda become today more extreme to dehumanise Russia as was our old enemies in those days. Im half Russian and the time will come for revenge! The taliban will are a kids in comparison to us !!!
Russia has long and mid range mobile cruise missiles + satellites... you can forget about surprise attack or getting aircraft carriers in range for planes to take off.
@Robert Bradshaw; that's a silly analysis. I don't think Russia loses sleep over those US toys in the black sea. They will be fried /gone/kaput in the first 5minutes of the war. The Baltic countries of Lituania, Slovenia and Latvia will fall in the first 24hours or 12hour even and Poland's north east will be surrounded almost as Russia is already positioned in Belarus and at the centre of Europe at Kaliningrad within shooting distance of Germany and all of Europe. It would be madness indeed to try a war with Russia.
Next video could the Russian military even make it halfway to Alaska?
Dunno. Alaska has like 17 people who could probably hold them off.
*Winter* : when do i come in?
Instead Biden & Putin can have a boxing match
I would love that!
Putin wins first round knockout. That assumes dementia Joe could actually figure out how to get to the ring.
Biden would knock down himself before he sees putin in the ring
Wow! It’s hard to believe this was made a year ago and suddenly became relevant.
russia cant even defeat ukraine... it is no match for even europe
Russians didn’t even start yet and did US defeated Afghanistan in middle east 🤦🏽♂️
@@Pyasa.shaitan the USA if it didn't have idiots for politicians and let the military run its wars would have no problem defeating anyone in the world. The government ties their hands like they did in Korea, Vietnam etc. Left alone the USA is just too strong of a military power as the Japanese Empire has learned the hard way. Should have listened to General Patton in 1945 because he immediately knew the USSR was a threat and wanted to go to war instantly after defeating Nazi Germany. But that was the beginning of politics getting involved with military affairs. Winston Churchhill also wanted Great Britain to fight the USSR immediately after the defeat of Nazi Germany but his politicians had no set of balls as well. czcams.com/video/AxAIE9TbGyk/video.html
Chill its been a week only. You want the outcome here watch this vid .m.czcams.com/video/aMCqq-SoIAo/video.html
And the US army issues complimentary high-heels to it's troops.
First week of war and everyone is jumping to conclusions...
Does Biden even remember what Russia even is ?
Come on man! You know the thing!
That thumbnail's gonna cause some-- *Looks down in the comment section* Yeah, it already has.
@Lucas Guldager First-Europe would not have had time to respond, as it is very close). Secondly.. well, yes, we would not immediately attack with nuclear weapons.. and we would fight normally, but if the war became disastrous for us, we would destroy all of them. Putin has made it clear that without us, there will be no world ;)
@Lucas Guldager That's right, we are not the United States to attack with atomic weapons those who do not pose a mortal danger to us.
@Lucas Guldager But in Russia there is one system that I would like to inform you about, it is called "Perimeter" or "Dead Hand". This is an automated system located all over the country (Russia), consisting of a huge number of sensors and computers, which constantly analyzes many parameters offline.
Checks seismic activity across the country and other indicators.
And if someone organizes a massive attack with the use of nuclear weapons on the territory of Russia, then even if all the people are destroyed, this system will autonomously give the command for a massive retaliatory strike.
And from all the surviving underground mines, submarines, ships, etc., nuclear missiles will be fired.
That is why it is called the "Dead Hand" according to the NATO classification, because even if all the people were killed, the retaliatory strike would still destroy all the enemies.
I really like thay outro : ) ♡
Wow the 1st 30 seconds of this sound different today.
If US will ever think of invading Russia, first thinks about what happened to Napoleon and Hitler.
~Love from India 🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺
Mongols invaded. Others have too and been successful.
@@diegorodriguez4252 no only the Mongols were able to invade and successfully hold territory.
@احمد ضياء they were the largest land empire to exist
@@diegorodriguez4252 who was successful and why they aren’t in Russia anymore? Nobody could conquer Russia! Nobody! Russia was as small as Florida 1.000 years ago and after each invasion it became double bigger. Nowadays Russia is the biggest country in the world just because Sweden, Poland, Germany, France, Turkey and others had tried to invade it and as a result lost their territories.
@@WalkerSoc British empire was the largest
This will never happen as it would be a suicidal mission. As Napoleon correctly noted when he attacked Russia, the more you advance the more the country opens up like a funnel.
Only if America tried to rush the war
@@oattyrant2035 it couldnt russia is simply to big
Russia isn't a big deal .The problem is that they have the largest nuclear arsenal in the world .
@@kinderboeken55 bs nothing is too big to conquer its just America doesn't like tough things
@@oattyrant2035 so why dont you conquer it cyka
This guy somehow predicted the ukraine conflict
Because the way started in 2014. It was only a ceasefire
Who else came here after Russia invaded Ukraine?
Getting into Russia would be no problem for the USA. The problem will be getting out.
Sad Afghanistan noises
@@darkchocolate1219 I don't believe there's any comparison. Afghanistan would be a vacation, compared to Russia.
Please do the following:
* 🇺🇸 USA vs. 🇪🇺 EU
* 🇨🇳 China vs. 🇵🇭🇲🇨🇲🇾🇸🇬🇧🇳🇻🇳🇹🇭🇰🇭🇱🇦🇲🇲 ASEAN
EU VS ASEAN
He already did USA vs EU
@@ethansaporsky6958 No he didn't. He only did US vs. UK.
It's not on his channel.
None of the Southeast Asian countries can enter the top 10 military forces, and the number of troops can be superposed, but the military science and technology can not be superposed. China may have more troops than southeast Asia put together, and China ranks third in the world in military science and technology. So it's obvious
Based on what we've seen since the US could easily dismantle Russian air and anti-air capabilities and establish air dominance within the first couple months. The US supple lines are likely easier to maintain than Russia within its only country. Stationary rail is an easy target. I don't see any likely losses anywhere close to what you state in the video especially in hindsight of the last years performance.
Based on Ukraine always succeeds,Russia always fails infantile media?
Date 21.08.2022...
After six months of Russia's successes over Ukraine I am sure that although conquer is pointless but US could easily wipe out entire Russian navy and air force in a less than a month with loss ratio so shameful to defenders high much that is not fair to humiliate "Red ones"...
Although ukraine has put up heavy resistance, its not looking good. Russian soldiers have terrible morale, and both sides have lost thousands. The war is a whole mess
Some have tried …
Yes but only smaller countries
@@Zeta_Reticulum
usa is smaller than russia. russian territory is much much bigger.
@@Zeta_Reticulum
greatest russian mistake was selling alaska to us.
Why don't you take into consideration the manufacturing capacity of both countries? At a time of war, countries will not simply rely on the available military hardware they have. A country will mobilize its economy for war production. Wouldn't that change the outcome of the war?
It is a question of how fast countries could increase production. In short scenarious like above it wouldn't matter. Time of war requires sacrifices from civilian population and I have big doubts that modern US citizens would support any big war. Same goes for Russia.
Strictly speaking, all major powers believe that the next wars will all be "come as you are" affairs given the proliferation of long range guided missiles and speed of modern warfare making the continual production and fielding of new equipment within the time it would be useful almost impossible, this is why both the United States and Russian Federation have massive stockpiles of both modern and mothballed equipment ready to be fielded or repaired and fielded in a very short amount of time.
While it was a major factor in the wars of yesteryear that went on for years at a time and moved slower, modern wars between major powers rarely last more than one year. Countries will in fact rely on the available military hardware they have.
This isnt 1940. You can't convert a car factory into making tanks anymore.
Far overestimating Russian mission strike capabilities. They bombed Ukrainian military airports but couldn’t even manage to hit the damn runway, so it could still operate.
Their military fault due to piss poor training.
Why would the United States go through the Atlantic Ocean and not the Pacific Ocean to get to Russia
Cause of all the main targets are in the west part
Because who cares about invading Siberia? All population centers, and the center of government, are in the western side of country.
Genghis Khan, Napoleon, and Hitler: Good luck bro
and in every case russia was the country with the bigger population.
This time it is 2:1 for the USA.
Let's begin....
Genghis Khan won in his war agents the rus
Just want to shoot out some love for the Russian people from the States. Even when our governments were at odds, we never hated you.
Same for the Chinese. The government is where our tension lies not the people.
@Crazy Dude they use vps's
@@caitgrigsby4287 American government is responsible for tension though.
@@SI-cd7xs tell that to Georgia and Ukraine
@History Maniac Yes CZcams is banned in China therefore China is not using youtube 😁
I imagine this vid has exploded in views for the past few weeks