There may be panic or the crew are inexperienced newbies who are completely blind on the battlefield and are trying to retreat in the wrong direction. Who knows..
honestly inside a tank you ahve terrible visibility. considering the commander wasnt looking outside his cupola they propaply just didnt see outside the viewport at the right time.
This is probably one of the most incredible videos I've seen to DATE. There are videos far and few of actually seeing the famed 88cm FLAK in action in an anti tank role and seeing rounds hit its target. There are some that may say this a propaganda clip but regardless I've only read about "hits" meanwhile these 40 second video clips will replace a library full of WW2 books describing it. Bravo!
Some british tankers reported that a further demoralizing factor in North Africa was the sight of a trail of dust raised by a "88" shell racing straight towards them.
@@anthroimperzia3927 English did nothing during ww2... Drink tea, get away from Dunkerque like cowards, eat the Leopold rail gun ammunition for dinner and breakfast and eat a lot of V1 and V2...
It's a Matilda II. Britain sent around 5000 armoured vehicles to the Soviet Union under Lend Lease, (1400 were from Canada) including Valentines, Matildas, Churchills, Tetrarchs, and Universal Carriers. They also supplied over 7000 aircraft of various types, of which around 3000 came from the US, as part of the British Lend Lease commitment to the Soviet Union, in exchange for which Britain supplied aircraft to the US for their use in the European Theatre.
They weren't strong, they were numerous and massively supported by foreign powers. Really they weren't admirable at all unless you are impressed by capacity for fanatic abusive slavery. Communism was the enemy of Russians too and unfortunately their memory of WWII and the USSR is entangled with it now.
1942 год - русские танки горят и без башни. 2022-2024 - русские танки снова горят и снова без башни. Это какой то магический заколдованный круговорот ...😊
Нужно уточнить, не русские, а росиянские! Россия как и тогда, так и сейчас развязала войну, в чём они обязаны поплатится и в этот раз её спасать от голода нельзя!!!
@@isenbull2242 Und in der russischen Propaganda? Gab es da brennende russische Panzer? Im Krieg ist die Lüge die Wahrheit! Respekt an alle die in diesem Krieg gestorben sind, und verwundet wurden. Und Respekt an die, die ihn überlebt haben!
The ones in important places would have quickly been overrun, and the rest would have been squandered. Flak 88 units where concentrated specifically to areas anticipated for armored attacks, aside from thier uses as artillery or anti-air. The other less strategic AT outfits, like Division assigned AT companies with Paks would more closely be what you're thinking.
и? наличие хроники того времени уже хорошо. Возможно нарезка одного боя. У камер того времени, в катушке было всего 15 метров пленки. И порой ловили разные моменты, чтобы не спустить все в пустоту.
@@denfilm6005 дальность обстрела посмотри и на траву.... когда едет т34, там не 88мм зенитка, а крупнокалибр.пулемет...поэтлму и т34 не опасаясь едет.. А зенитка бьет по неподвижным целям....Вот тебе и склейка....
@@hw97karbine imagine if it was AI upscaled and colorized. I've never seen actual 88cm FLAK hits on any tank other than this video. Incredible as always.
The range is incredible.... 200 meters???? Tanks are driving past an enemy 88mm anti tank gun paying no attention at those ranges.
I thought that too.
There may be panic or the crew are inexperienced newbies who are completely blind on the battlefield and are trying to retreat in the wrong direction. Who knows..
honestly inside a tank you ahve terrible visibility. considering the commander wasnt looking outside his cupola they propaply just didnt see outside the viewport at the right time.
The 88 was definitely not at 200m.. from the muzzle velocity and time to impact i would guess 600m. The tanks are driving past smaller caliber weapons
@@Mfields4517 I don't think so, you can clearly see the wheeled bogie in the foreground. A clear sign of the 88 position.
This is probably one of the most incredible videos I've seen to DATE. There are videos far and few of actually seeing the famed 88cm FLAK in action in an anti tank role and seeing rounds hit its target. There are some that may say this a propaganda clip but regardless I've only read about "hits" meanwhile these 40 second video clips will replace a library full of WW2 books describing it. Bravo!
Interesting to see how quickly Lend-Lease was making it to the fields.
Do you realize you give us, armor modelers, ideas and more ideas for dioramas, thanks to your videos???
unbelievable footage
You're on a roll with this DANK A** footage my guy.
Some british tankers reported that a further demoralizing factor in North Africa was the sight of a trail of dust raised by a "88" shell racing straight towards them.
You mean Projectile !! The Shell stays with the Gun .
"Shell" has always been used to describe an artillery projectile.
Ahh yes the Soviet Matilda, slow and unreliable.
They used Matildas more than the English did
@@anthroimperzia3927 English did nothing during ww2... Drink tea, get away from Dunkerque like cowards, eat the Leopold rail gun ammunition for dinner and breakfast and eat a lot of V1 and V2...
Точность немцев вызывает восторг
It always amazes me the number of western allied tanks appear in Soviet east front footage. Here are several Matildas mixed with T 34’s.
Fjb
Here Soviet got themselves lend lease Matilda, rare footage I do say
00:32
Left tank is Valentine?
Judging from the large toolbox, looks like that.
There are more british tanks than i expected.
It's a Matilda II. Britain sent around 5000 armoured vehicles to the Soviet Union under Lend Lease, (1400 were from Canada) including Valentines, Matildas, Churchills, Tetrarchs, and Universal Carriers. They also supplied over 7000 aircraft of various types, of which around 3000 came from the US, as part of the British Lend Lease commitment to the Soviet Union, in exchange for which Britain supplied aircraft to the US for their use in the European Theatre.
Soviet tactics; bought to you by brute strength, ignorance and vodka.
They weren't strong, they were numerous and massively supported by foreign powers. Really they weren't admirable at all unless you are impressed by capacity for fanatic abusive slavery. Communism was the enemy of Russians too and unfortunately their memory of WWII and the USSR is entangled with it now.
1942 год - русские танки горят и без башни.
2022-2024 - русские танки снова горят и снова без башни.
Это какой то магический заколдованный круговорот ...😊
Нерусские танки тоже чотко горят, все видели.
Можем повторить
Нужно уточнить, не русские, а росиянские! Россия как и тогда, так и сейчас развязала войну, в чём они обязаны поплатится и в этот раз её спасать от голода нельзя!!!
@@ggrun3291 Но за все время кинохроник , которые я видел, не было ни одного германского танка без башни. Ну вот , билять да , ни разу ! Сам в ахуе ! 😵
@@isenbull2242 Und in der russischen Propaganda? Gab es da brennende russische Panzer?
Im Krieg ist die Lüge die Wahrheit! Respekt an alle die in diesem Krieg gestorben sind, und verwundet wurden. Und Respekt an die, die ihn überlebt haben!
I know it's a fantasy world but what if the germans had put a flak gun every half km from the baltic to black sea.
When the red army advanced into Germany they had a field gun every 10 meters on a 10 km front. Good luck with one gun every 500 meters .
The ones in important places would have quickly been overrun, and the rest would have been squandered. Flak 88 units where concentrated specifically to areas anticipated for armored attacks, aside from thier uses as artillery or anti-air. The other less strategic AT outfits, like Division assigned AT companies with Paks would more closely be what you're thinking.
Склейка разных видео...Т34 едет боком к позиции немцев?
и? наличие хроники того времени уже хорошо. Возможно нарезка одного боя. У камер того времени, в катушке было всего 15 метров пленки. И порой ловили разные моменты, чтобы не спустить все в пустоту.
@@denfilm6005 дальность обстрела посмотри и на траву.... когда едет т34, там не 88мм зенитка, а крупнокалибр.пулемет...поэтлму и т34 не опасаясь едет.. А зенитка бьет по неподвижным целям....Вот тебе и склейка....
@@ddefender6228 и? к чему подводишь? То что т-34 не горели?
@@denfilm6005 я про склейку разных кадров.... че украинец? Плохо русский понимаешь?
@@ddefender6228 о, зэтник поди? Ну давай, мне сибиряку про русский язык предъяви.
AI enhanced?
No, just well digitized
@@hw97karbine imagine if it was AI upscaled and colorized. I've never seen actual 88cm FLAK hits on any tank other than this video. Incredible as always.