I like how there are 5 or so clips in there about running to first outside of the running lane. But when trea turner did it in the world series everyone was losing their marbles because "HoW iS tHat NoT iN tHe RuNiNg lane?"
@@daleksupreme8822 I know the the running lane works. I just think its funny how you see the exact same thing what happend with trea turner. Who was correctly called out just like most examples here, and everyone is fine with it. But then the nationals and fans starting losing their minds because "he ran straight to the bag"
6:12 I had that obstruction play. Is it obstruction? Type A obstruction or Type B obstruction? Runner on 2nd, batted ball, shortstop and the runner on 2nd collided at the same time. I’ve a cluster bottle neck situation here. My judgement, I awarded the runner on 2nd a base (3rd base) because you need to give the runner a lane. That’s what I saw, that’s my judgement call. Now this was a batted ball, the shortstop was fielding the ball, however you need to give the runner a lane. In baseball umpires love outs, coaches love outs (defense in play) coaches love awarded base (offense in play). Hopefully I made the right call, mistakes are showing proof that you are trying.
The runner is entitled to the basepath, but he cannot obstruct the fielder from being able to make the play. This is the most contradictory rule in baseball that I have ever seen. That and the catcher cannot block the plate unless he has possession of the ball.
The batter interfered with the catcher attempting to play on a batted ball by watching the ball instead of heading to first base. Clearly interference, batter is out.
Cool video, maybe a little more explanation on vague ones. Was he called out?
The one at 6:12 why was he called out, the short stop was closer to the ball and should have been the 'protected player' to field the ball?
Terrible call. There was clearly no interference on that play.
The clip that starts at 1:23 is obstruction, not interference. You should learn the difference.
I like how there are 5 or so clips in there about running to first outside of the running lane. But when trea turner did it in the world series everyone was losing their marbles because "HoW iS tHat NoT iN tHe RuNiNg lane?"
You have to cross over to touch the base, so if you run in running lane most of the wat then cross over, it’s not interference.
@@daleksupreme8822 I know the the running lane works. I just think its funny how you see the exact same thing what happend with trea turner. Who was correctly called out just like most examples here, and everyone is fine with it. But then the nationals and fans starting losing their minds because "he ran straight to the bag"
@@RicardoKugo I misunderstood what you were saying, my bad.
@@RicardoKugo notice how these guys are running in fair territory the entire time, unlike turner, who just entered to touch first base.
Now do a video about umpire interference.
6:12 I had that obstruction play. Is it obstruction? Type A obstruction or Type B obstruction?
Runner on 2nd, batted ball, shortstop and the runner on 2nd collided at the same time. I’ve a cluster bottle neck situation here.
My judgement, I awarded the runner on 2nd a base (3rd base) because you need to give the runner a lane. That’s what I saw, that’s my judgement call.
Now this was a batted ball, the shortstop was fielding the ball, however you need to give the runner a lane.
In baseball umpires love outs, coaches love outs (defense in play) coaches love awarded base (offense in play).
Hopefully I made the right call, mistakes are showing proof that you are trying.
The runner is entitled to the basepath, but he cannot obstruct the fielder from being able to make the play. This is the most contradictory rule in baseball that I have ever seen. That and the catcher cannot block the plate unless he has possession of the ball.
You could not be more wrong. The fielder has the right of way. This is interference, not obstruction.
Yes, long time ump here, runner must give way to the first fielder to the ball. Interference on the base runner all day.
6:35 LOOOL that looked really sus buy the catcher
The batter interfered with the catcher attempting to play on a batted ball by watching the ball instead of heading to first base. Clearly interference, batter is out.
@@alanhess9306how did he interfere when the ball was not even near him? lol look where it landed
@@aaronaguilar9172 He hindered the catcher who was attempting a play on a batted ball. Clearly interference.