Joe Rogan: "It's Obvious The Videos From The Moon Are Fake"
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 04. 2024
- FREE Alpha Brain Trial ► onnit.sjv.io/LPvLgM
CODE: jredaily for 10% off other purchases ► onnit.sjv.io/jWPr2e
Sub for daily JRE clips! ► / @jredailyclips
Onnit Affiliated.
Bart Sibrel is a filmmaker, writer, and investigative journalist. He's the director of the films "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" and "Astronauts Gone Wild: An Investigation Into the Authenticity of the Moon Landings," and author of the book "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List."
Clip taken from JRE #2141 w/ Bart Sibrel
Host: Joe Rogan
Guest: Bart Sibrel
Producer: Jamie Vernon
#jre #joerogan - Komedie
ngl guys, i think this guest was pretty silly too
With the amount of evidence being true vs the "I don't think this looks right". I think I'ma also stick with the moon landing being legit 😂 if we can put hundreds of satellites in space in weeks I think it's feasible that we've landed things on the moon
@vestilad242 move along. There's nothing to see here
@@vestilad242 IKR? “I don’t think this look right” no kidding. They’re on the MOON.
@@vestilad242 And that's why we currently cannot go back to the moon now, according to NASA. lets just pretend the Van Allen radiation belts around the planet don't exist.
Sounds good to me.
@@vestilad242 Geosynchronous orbit is right around 24,000 miles. The moon is 239,000. We don't even put fuel in a perfectly good satellite that costs 100s of millions, if not a billion. This is equivalent of you boosting a Ferrari off a cliff because it's out of gas. They boost satellites out spot as space junk. The ISS max orbit is 330 miles.
😂😂😂 they literally have no idea how things in a vacuum behave 🤦🏼♂️
Put your 🥒 in a vacuum cleaner you'll figure it out
Things in a vacuum ? That’s a nice trendphrase
Put your 🥒 in a vacuum cleaner you'll understand how it works
Took a dump at Starbucks clogged the toilet 🪠 but I left a note blaming Trump so I'm good.
@@protestthisyouloser1093they literally have no idea how *insert noun* in a vacuum behave
If they weren’t arguing the same exact point, I would think they were disagreeing with how much they talk over, interrupt, and seemingly argue points against each other while simultaneously agreeing 😅🤦♂️
whats up with the car on ice ending again lol
Same. If someone finds out, please comment! 😂
Shhhh....It's all part of the cover up.
So why didn’t the USSR accuse them of being fake videos? Were the USA and USSR conspiring together?
That's the best response to that dialogue...... The Russian would have been the first one to say that !!!!! They never said anything !!!!
@@rubenluciowcouldn’t prove then wrong
USSR did say something but USA counterpart something scandalous back so they hush hush and then years later became Russia 🤯
There were Russian scientists saying it wasn't real years ago..
Exactly
How cool would it be if all of space had breathable air
Would it be tho? What would you do in space?
You would hear a deafening scream from the sun at all times.
According to some in congress, the moon is made up of gasses, no way to land on gas 😂
It's made of cheese. Duh
Biden lands on gas every day.
That lady is a complete dunce. 😂
@@engste678cheese Gromit!
Gasses with craters....
Mythbusters explained the flag 20 years ago.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡✌️✌️
@@Frank-sr1dzlooks like you are the 🤡
Well said@@Frank-sr1dz
Was the flag a LGBTIA+++ flag
Ha ha ha
Ha hahaha. Did they ?
i lost it when he said 150% chance :)
That kind understanding of basic math is insane. Who fucking vetted this guest?
Literally the dumbest part of this whole video 🤦
That and "degradaded"
There's a rigid frame attached to and possibly running through that flag. With no atmosphere to interact with and very little gravity it flexes and rocks back and forth for a long time. It was folded until used so some of the pieces of the frame may be shifting and adjusting to their new extended state. Also things heat up quickly when suddenly exposed to sunlight. That could have caused the frame to expand in ways that appear unnatural to our earth-bound eyes. Static electricity can attract things. By moving around the astronauts are building up static fields that can attract or repel things as they pass them.
Also vibrations can be running forwards and backwards through the frame. Again, because of no air drag and a much lower gravity those vibrations may course for a long time. For several seconds the vibrations might cancel each other out but then they finally sync up and snap the top which makes the flag move before finally settling.
What about.... Neil Armstrong putting the mirrors on the moon. Those mirrors have allowed astronomers to chart space to the millionth of degree.....
There is an enormous amount of static electricity produced by regolith dust being moved around by the astronaut's boots. When they walk near the nylon flag grounded to a metal pole stuck in the ground, the static charge is pulling slightly on the light nylon, with no air resistance to baffle the movement.
computing power and sending rockets into space does not equal better video recording technology. Part of the "fourth gen" video is because the signal from the moon was not compatible with television network technology. Color was new and it was at 30 fps but 525 interlaced lines compared to now where 1280 x 720 is considered inferior. It was a conversion issue not a quality issue per se.
I heard Australia got the only live feed of moon landing
What about the solidity of the ground? If you step next to the flag, could the vibration make it move 👀
No vacuum.
If this is the other side I'm going back to believing the mainstream media 😂😂😂
I think the least compelling thing is the flag. I think one of the most compelling things is.There was a guy on the ground with a ham radio listening in. And he got all the footage of them talking about Santa Claus and structures and bridges.And then they went to a different channel.
Not to mention there is no blast crater underneath the lunar lander... That thing has a partial rocket engine underneath it to help reverse its thrust as it lands. And the gold foil covered lander pads have not one speck of dust on them.... And I could go on and on about how they've analyzed the background Images of the moon and over numerous days of them being there, going to far different places.That was all the exact same background without changing even a little for movement...
The 2 top IQ tests, Covid in 2020 and the moon landing.
Fake & fake 😹
@@user-lf4zw4es7i😭🤣🫵😂
Absolutely. The national IQ test the majority failed. I’m convinced people are getting dumber and dumber as time goes on.
Agree with the moon landing, but Covid was the same thing as global warming, or eh, climate change. A test of your hysteria..
Obviously this is a discussion about how objects behave in vacuum in lower gravity, without any of them two having the experience of how it behaves in the real situation. It's a nice example of how the fake stories are made, by sowing doubts about something nobody of us knows first hand. Very funny this is!
Joe are you fucking serious?
"That's why they degradaded the signal"
Numpty.
A 50% chance for 3 days is not a 150% chance, it's still just a 50% chance.
In the colour footage from Apollo 5 it clearly shows the wrinkles in the flag moving in lockstep. That is not what a flag looks like when it is being affected by a breeze. The breeze would move the wrinkles like a wave moves across the face of the water. The fact that the wrinkles move in unison shows that they were just wrinkles, as NASA has explained, the result of being squished for four days, and they didn't unravel because the gravity of the Moon was too weak to do it. The "waving" is simply the result of moving the flag into place, and, I suspect, deliberate motion imparted by the astronauts to create the "flag waving effect" on the Moon. Note that the top of the flag is held into place by a bar to keep it from simply drooping on the pole.
Why is this even still a discussion, just land on the moon in 2024 and record the initial landing zone.
I think that’s kind of the point. The fact that its not been done all these years later. Supposedly they can’t even get past the van Allen belts now.
So you can say its CGI. Just like for the pictures of the landing site taken by other countries.
yeah the CGI is so real these day's, they would still say it's fake
"We destroyed the technology that we used to land on the moon" A guy from NASA said.
How convenient.
@@borizovskimilan What does he mean by technology?
Bubbles are being popped everywhere. Prepare for them to start coming faster
The flag has wire frame holding it up in place?
When the President was having his conversation with the astronauts, there was zero lag in time between the transmission and the reply. In 1990, a phone call between eastern and Canada and still had a noticeable lag time. Someone wants to explain?
When Nixon stopped talking there was a delay until the response. When the astronaut stopped talking there was no delay until Nixon talked because their conversation was recorded on Earth.
There, its explained.
you can see all that gear they left behind on the moon today. what a bunch of bs...
No you can't. You see what NASA shows you.
I can't. You must be looking at the other side.
@Koopyspappyyeah sure. Bullshit.
@Koopyspappy prove it
@@2Drezik there would be videos on youtube if it were true.
Joe, Joe, Joe. Why Joe?
Uh, wrong footage at the end guys lol
China took pictures of the Moon landing site with their orbiter. What is wrong with those pictures?
Are they CGI?
Where are these pictures?
This guy doesn't understand basic physics. Once you leave orbit nothing is stopping you. You don't need 800k tons of fuel to get a ship to the moon.
So, if it's a vacuum, what are the rockets thrusting against?
@@engste678Piss particles
Nothing. An object in motion stays in motion.
@@engste678 rockets literally thrust out fuel PLUS the fuel gets ignited which makes it expand by a factor of over a thousand. The entire energy of thrusting out the fuel gets transferred to the rocket ( actio = reactio ) and half of the energy of the expansion gets transferred to the rocket.
If you were floating in space with a bowling ball in hand and toss away the bowling ball, you will move away in the opposite direction (plus perhaps start spinning depending whether you threw it in line with your center of gravity or not).
@@engste678 Against nothing of course. The force comes from the high speed conversion of potential energy in the fuel into kinetic force in the opposite direction of the thrust. Duh
Cheers bongs up
🍄🍄🍄🦨🧠🧠🤣🤣✌️✌️✌️🌎
Static magnetic gravity
The moon vibrates like a bell is whats been said.
Come on Joe, everyone knows the Moon is made of Cheese…
Imagine the light weight of a grain of lunar dust that occupies its space without flying or floating with the slight gravitational attraction of the Moon. Now weigh a flag and think a little, obviously it would have to fall without showing almost its appearance.
They don't consider the flag could start moving because the astronaut just jumped onto the regolith near where the flag was planted?
Stages are flimsy. Probably the plywood moving..
@@engste678plywood LOL.
Stanley Kubrick can make it move or stand still hes amazing
This again??
this will never go away
No color cameras because this went out to the lowest bidder.
Sending a new colour camera with low resolution and unproven reliability to the Moon did not make sense in 1969. A hundredth iteration of black and white technology is always going to be more reliable than the first iteration of colour technology, and it more likely weighed a lot less, too, a very important consideration in those days. The advance of miniaturized technology in those times was greatly advanced by NASA's quest to save weight in its space programme.
What other thing check out the flag. There's no natural Shadow from the flag. Just like you see shadows from other people there there's no shadow on the flag that's weird
No it’s not fake. It looks that way because of the physics of the camera lens they had to use. It will only develop at a certain plane / distance. That’s why the images look different and why you can’t see stars in the background
You can't see the stars in the background because the surface of the Moon was blazingly bright. When you adjust the camera to compensate for this brightness, the stars become too dim to show up.
The flag is similar to aluminum foil and there were stiff pieces they placed on the flag to keep it standing like it was being blown by the wind. I will say the the love feed aspect is interesting
JRE clips yet we get 1 a week lol
We did not go to the moon. The conspiracy theory is that we did go to the moon.
You can bounce a laser off of a dish they left on the moon. We went there 100% for certain. Now the first "landing" footage may have been faked to beat the Russians. But we eventually got there beyond any doubt.
Shadows going different directions is a big tell.
But they aren't. They are also the same proportion as you'd expect from sunlight.
There is zero faked video of the Apollo missions. There were a couple of images of astronauts on earth that got edited into a background of the moon for some promotional materials. That's literally the whole 'conspiracy'.
I mean, these batshit theories are supported by geniuses like the dude in this video who thinks 3 times 50% chance is 150%...
3x 50% chance is 1 - 1/2^3 = 87.5% , but not that that matters. Von Braun didn't know about the conditions on the moon. That's what the surveyor missions were for, which were the third program of multiple unmanned missions to the moon by the US.
The reason the flag wiggles is because there no atmosphere and therefore no friction with the air that dissipates the kinetic energy.
wrong nvidia proves that shit years ago when ray tracing became mainstream
The lander which is white or reflective metal (foil) will be reflecting a lot of light. In order to get a good exposure they've had to close down the iris in the cameras. The moon's surface is quite brilliant and would hurt your eyes if you didn't have a reflective visor to block much of it. All that light bouncing off of the ship, equipment, rocks and astronauts can throw multiple shadows.
@@dinkmartini3236 people prefer to believe the hoax then to investigate, i gave you evidence how all the lights have a source by talking about Nvidia and their experiment with the lighting, but what can you do, stupidiy stays stupid because they chose to.
Have you ever seen shadows photographed on uneven ground? It's an illusion, bud, and you could reproduce that illusion in your front yard using the shadows of parallel posts crossing uneven ground. From certain angles, the parallel shadows will appear to diverge or converge, and the two dimensional photo of a three dimensional surface will fool the eye.
Imagin dust of the Moon grains weigh have to float so then a flag weight its more heavy than a grain of dust in the Moon think aboute that
Every topic that turns out to be true has a wiki context, go and find those and you will be somewhat educated.
You need to interview a native American guy. I’m telling you they have the best stories you’ll ever hear in your entire life but they have to be willing to tell which isn’t easy They talk about UFOs Bigfoot Skinwalkers and more
Flag not moving - Made out of different material, used really thin metal support rods inside the material lol
No one’s ever been to the moon
Maybe the vibration from him jumping near the flag made it move. It takes very little force to make that flag move in a vaccuum.
Do channels that upload content from JRE like this make any money????
363 foot tall Saturn rocket used 4,578,000 lbs of fuel just to launch and get ‘into’ space. So how much more fuel does it take to complete the 480,000 mile round trip to the moon
Von Braun told them the same. Can't possibly carry the fuel.
Do you monkeys think that they were firing the engines all the way to the Moon..? Welp. This is what happens when every simpleton gets to express an opinion online.
literally zero more fuel to get there, once you move in space theres no stopping and no resistance, fuel would be needed for deceleration and to take off from the moon would require no where near as much power as it's a significantly lighter module, there's 1/6th gravity and no atmosphere. This is physics 101
@@JordanKaminskiOf course there is resistance, it's not deep space. Earth's gravity well doesn't end, it is infinite and just decreases in strength. I don't know how far away you have to be to maintain speed without considerable controlled burns, but it's way further than the point at which you enter the moons gravity well. There is no "zero gravity" between the Earth and the Moon.
@@kamikariad During trans-lunar injection each stage carries its own fuel, and burns for a fixed amount of time and coasts for the rest of the way. What exactly is the problem, here?
Dammit Jaime, do your job!
Come on, guys, like the guest said NASA intentionally degregeggadated the footage. Case closed.
Only one way to prove it. Go back.
NO JAMIE!!! 😂🤣
India telescope shows the moon landing site
Mr Rogan needs to change his maxi. Snapping on Jamie and his guest. Maybe he got in trouble for drooling over Tulsi 😂
Degradaded? Does he mean degraded?
Why we not been on thr moon for ages its a valid argument
Because it cost a lot of money, and they had already done it, definitively winning the Space Race with the USSR. The propaganda value had been expended.
Hey Joe, pull out this ignorant take next time you have Neil Degrasse Tyson on. Say it just like that, too. "It's obvious that the videos from the moon are fake". Should be an interesting conversation, or a scolding. Not sure which.
We landed on the moon, several times.
Why not get someone actually smart instead of a token astronomer?
Ohhhh...OBVIOUS ??😂😂😂
All the "physics Experts making posting comments forget about the Van Allen radiation belts. And lets not mention the food and water that a little Apollo capsule would have to carry.
What about the Van Allen radiation belts? What about the food and water?
@@djuro14 Never heard of them?
@@Alosipher What about them?
They passed through the Van Allen belts quickly, minimizing the radiation exposure. It just like you can pass your finger through a flame. You merely have to do it quickly enough, and you won't get burned. As for food, packing freeze-dried food for three people for 8 days hardly seems a reach for a journey to the Moon.
Joe’s lane is mma/outdoor topics and some Universe topics. His political analysis and conspiracy theory obsession undermines his credibility more than not
I didn’t see anything on this video that was conspiracy. If you did please let me know.
Trippin. His stoner conspiracy theories are another base he has
His boxing knowledge is super cringe, you'd think that would be at least vaguely in his lane. Most things Joe says are consistently wonky, but we're all suckers for the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect - kinda thing.
@@larrybuckner8619the moon landings being fake
Spoken like someone who's been watching Joe for a whole 5 years.
Celluloid film being live projected at the moon and Rogan is like “my handlers are paging me Jamie!”
Anyone can fall for confirmation bias, even JR.
Just watch Mythbusters jeez
I lived next to an Apollo 15 astronaut
The flag moving is probably from walking next to the flag. The waves from the steps go through the ground and up the flagpole to the flag and distribute
SUPER FAKE
So many plausible conspiracies out there and we're doing this one? 😶
Easy way to know whether or not we actually went to the moon. If we did, there's a US flag on a moon. If we didn't, the flag isn't there. We have satellites that could do a fly by of the moon to show it, if the flag is there
Needing proof makes you a Russian disinformation agent
They've already done this! They've resolved photos of the landing sites. You can see the footprints where they walked, and the tracks of the rover.
@@Great_Sandwich I've never seen it, but you would think that would be something news worthy. Such as "the flag on the moon 60 years later"
@@kevinfidler8074 And just because you've never seen it, that means it never happened? Did you see WWII? No? I guess it never happened, then.
Jesus, just do a search for it! The photos are there, and it WAS news worthy. They announced it. It wasn't Earth shattering, but they put the photos out there for all to see.
@@kevinfidler8074 all you see on the news is covid, ukraine, lgbqt, and global warming. Its bonkers
Whats the point??? Who cares????
The flag on the moon appears to wave because of the moon's lack of atmosphere and minimal gravity, which causes vibrations to persist longer than on Earth. The flag is held in place by an armature on top of a pole that's driven into the moon's surface, and the flag is equipped with horizontal bars that protrude out from the flagpole to keep it unfurled. The flag may also appear to wave due to:
Incomplete extension of the horizontal arm
Sometimes the astronauts don't fully extend the arm, so the flag won't be stretched flat, leaving ripples in the fabric.
Wrinkles from being screwed up
The flag may have wrinkles from being screwed up for four days en route to the moon.
Powerful cosmic radiation
The flag may appear to wave due to powerful cosmic radiation washing over the moon.
Flag material moving with the pole
As the astronauts move and position the pole to plant it in the ground, the flag material moves with it, giving the illusion that it's waving.
joe is smart, but on these topics his brain seems to turn off
nobody has been to the moon or mars 👈
No one has ever claimed to have been to mars. Only a rover so ur not saying much there.
Where are the stars
Ah yes, 1960s cameras were known for their extreme dynamic range that could pick up the dim light of stars behind objects illuminated by 1300kW per square meter of DIRECT SUNLIGHT. They obviously also had the HDR algorithms necessary to compute all the image data to produce a HDR photo that has both the bright lunar surface and the dim stars....
Are you trolling? There were limits to exposure technology of the era. The moon's surface is so incredibly bright that in order to get a good exposure the iris on the cameras had to be closed way, way down. When you do that the feeble light of the stars doesn't have a chance of registering on the film or the photo receptor of the video cams. They could open up the iris and lengthen shutter speeds to get a shot of the stars but then the moon's surface and everything on it would be blown out pure white blobs with no detail or definition. You can simulate this somewhat at home. On a starry night look out your window with the lights inside the house both on anf off. When the lights are on, the irises of your eye shut down so that you see better. This will make most if not all stars in the window disappear. Once you turn the lights out and make it totally dark in the house (and give your eyes time to adjust) you can then see the stars because your irises will open up to allow more light in (including the weak light of stars).
m.czcams.com/video/uGg6ywErf9Y/video.html
So Joe is back on the juice eh....
we landed 6 times on the moon wasnt it?
And never done it since? Come on.
@@engste678 money
@@engste678well, there was no cheese
@@HubertofLiege Or oil
I stopped believing this little story after Covid and the jab.
How are they connected?
Are you kidding me? Grow up. If we didn’t go to the moon the Russians would have found out and they would still be rubbing our noses in it.
This to me is actually best point anyone can make besides the flag literally being made of a fabric that is rigid not lcotton.
Why would anyone have believed the Russians? 🤔
Rogan should stop sniffing the coke.
they had higher then 4k resolution in 1969
thats film through a projector not on a tv
We're going back soon with Artemis. Will be no debate
I pray we're not dumb enough to go all the way to the moon and land at one of the sites we were already at.
Fake
I thought Joe would be smarter than this.
I thought Joe was past this. Jeeeeesh.
Rogan really thinks the flag is made of
Regular material
Omg
Keep promoting your website lol
the flag was bending back and fourth because it was an L shaped pole
Of course Rogan knows what he's saying he's a pod caster and his knowledge of astrophysics is beyond rebuke...silly me😅
This guy also thinks the Earth is flat and Elvis is alive.
Jesus Christ I thought Joe was passed this shit LOL there are dozens of forms of hard evidence that we went to the moon LOL
So dumb
with all respect Uncle Fester
This guys fuckin annoying sometimes
Joe.!...if you Gona talk crazy, bring Alex Jones back!! This guy has no cred!