Orion's Voyage: A Journey Through the Artemis 2 Project
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 12. 05. 2024
- đ Get Our Merch designed with †/ @insanecuriosity
đ«Get 10% off Under Lucky Stars and enjoy our star maps completely custom-made đ« www.underluckystars.com/INSAN...
Commercial Purposes âș Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com
- -
How many of us heard the conspiracy that the moon landing was fake? Many, right? And somewhere in our subconscious, something in us believed the theory could be real. But NASA is not leaving any room for conspiracy theories anymore as itâs sending the first crewed mission to the moon since 1972âs Apollo, with the Artemis missions. And you will be part of every step of the flyby mission and bear witness for the next generations to come!
The Artemis project is a three-stage mission with the first stage, Artemis 1, consisting of testing the Orion module and the ICPS cryogenic propulsion stage around the moon.
The Artemis Project will progress to its second stage, Artemis 2, featuring several human-crewed missions that will take place onboard the Orion spacecraft by 2024.
So far, no woman has had the opportunity to set foot on the Moon, but that is very close, thanks to the Artemis program, designed by the American Space Agency to bring humanity back to the Moon, which is expected to take place between 2024 and 2025.
- -
"If You happen to see any content that is yours, and we didn't give credit in the right manner please let us know at Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com and we will correct it immediately"
"Some of our visual content is under an Attribution-ShareAlike license. (creativecommons.org/licenses/) in its different versions such as 1.0, 2.0, 3,0, and 4.0 - permitting commercial sharing with attribution given in each picture accordingly in the video."
Credits: Ron Miller, Mark A. Garlick / MarkGarlick.com
Credits: Nasa/Shutterstock/Storyblocks/Elon Musk/SpaceX/ESA/ESO/ Flickr
00:00 Intro
2:05 ARtemis 2 plan
7:50 differences
#insanecuriosity #artemis2 #orionspacecraft - VÄda a technologie
Never thought I'd get to see a crew moonlanding in my time. What an exciting time for space exploration.
yet
I want to see a Mars landing!
Before we go to Mars we need to test the systems on the moon first to workout the bugs
I highly agree
Where to begin. . .
The van Allen bekts are just a fraction of the magnetosphere. They only have a fraction of the radiation the magnetosheath has. Outside the magnetosphere is far more radiant than inside the van Allen belts.
No, we have not invented active shielding. Marco Durante of esa,nasal and gsi proved we need it but do jot have it. Passive shielding like aluminum is not able to shield outside the magnetosphere. Thus Apollo never went to the moon. It never had active shielding.
Orion is going into low earth orbit, not the moon.
@@thenewspacerace And not only that, when you look out at the horizon, it's straight and flat. Therefore the earth must be flat, and nobody has ever really sailed around the world. What they really did was they went all the way to the end then came back. Also, Bigfoot is the president of Atlantis.
The Artemis return to the moon program makes me kind of sad we don't live in the For All Mankind universe and timeline of events regarding space travel. Colonies on the moon before the 1980s, Pathfinder being the Nuclear Powered Shuttle that was launched from high altitude, and manned missions reaching Mars by the mid 1990's; Hell yes!
Better late than never?
@@injectablebacon1891 Oh I agree it's just when you look at the projected timeline of space travel set out during the Apollo mission days compared to reality we ended up with it is a little sad how far we fell behind it even if it was highly ambitious from the off
@@CartoonHero1986 Well, at least we'll be able to watch 4k live-streams of the moon missions, plus with how far computers have come since the apollo missions, the astronauts will have to do much less hands-on work, so it's not all bad.
@@injectablebacon1891 True... but He2 fusion power replacing fossil fuels by the late 80's early 90's would have been sweet (and highly speculative but hey).
@@CartoonHero1986 Honestly I think it was just an unrealistic estimate of when. Our cheapest phones now are more powerful than the computers used for the Apollo mission.
Can't wait for the incredible high resolution photographs that will be produced from this mission
To the moon landing deniers: Stanley Kubrick did indeed direct the moon landings in 1969. But, since Kubrick was a notorious perfectionist and auteur, he demanded the moon landing be filmed on location. đ
That would be the only way he "faked" the lack of atmospheric scattering and 1.62m/sÂČ gravitational acceleration, which everything in the video falls at even the dust from the Rovers and what was kicked up from boots.
No studio I know of has a magic anti gravity machine.
@@LisaAnn777 It was fake. Kubrick knew but wasn't directing. NASA simply make compilation of simulation sites and life size models. 1,62 ms2 effect was achieved by slow motion cameras đž. Astronauts was actors dangling on wires. Every step was predetermined. They film đ„ on earth simulation sites. You think that is super difficult? Nope. Literally all you need is life size models. And most of the shots was done in the day. All you need is blue to black conversion filter on the lens and blue sky get pitch black. Then actors play around the lunar mockup. Keep in mind that astronauts will be able to jump above 5 times more in true 1,6ms2 environment. But they jump no more than few inches from surface... And when video is speed up astronauts appear to be running. So super fast shutter speeds, slow motion and dark lens filter is literally all you need.
@@LORDVADER357 lol a slow motion hasselblad 500 el huh đ
The astronaut on wires won't change the dust and everything else calling at the same acceleration.
Also how do you explain the signal transmitting from the moon? Even amateur radio enthusiasts were able to pick it up and it was clearly coming from the moon, so aliens I guess? Lol
And why did the soviets not figure this all out, so the KGB was tricked yet some dropouts on the internet somehow figured it out?
Then what about Chang'e 2 orbiter seeing the tracks left by the Rovers? China wouldn't lie for us they try to weaponize anything they can as propaganda against the west.
Then there's also the hundreds of thousands of people involved in the Apollo programs.
Oh and all the universities worldwide who use the reflectors still up there that are used to measure distance of the moon. This is something many students do in University, and these reflectors happen to appear the same time as the Apollo missions, suspicious huh?
Completely illogical.
@@LORDVADER357You can literally speed up the video and see that the astronauts would be moving far too fast đđđ
@@MrObvious-tg8lz Depends how much you speed up the video đž
what was in the secondary payload of the artemis 1 mission? Also 4 astronauts launch then 2 return? or is that a mistake at the end?
Stages on a rocket, not "floors". Sheesh.... đ
I was 11 years old in 1969 and I was glued to the moon landing and all of NASA's missions. I loved it. I think the fact it has taken us this long to go back and go forward is sad. Let's go!...
One thing I take from Artemis I was that I was mesmerized by seeing the earth from the perspective of the moon and knowing that everything that we know, all our history, and our faiths is all on our blue sphere and that someone can cover up our planet with their thumb, showing that we are minute compared to the cosmos and we need to take care of our planet for future generations.
Great video !
insanely good
great... bravoo
No, I donât think for even one moment it was fake!
Where to begin. . .
The van Allen bekts are just a fraction of the magnetosphere. They only have a fraction of the radiation the magnetosheath has. Outside the magnetosphere is far more radiant than inside the van Allen belts.
No, we have not invented active shielding. Marco Durante of esa,nasal and gsi proved we need it but do jot have it. Passive shielding like aluminum is not able to shield outside the magnetosphere. Thus Apollo never went to the moon. It never had active shielding.
Orion is going into low earth orbit, not the moon.
@@thenewspacerace Ok einstein.
Flat Earthers.
No way, too much detail available in the engineering that NEVER wouldâve even been addressed if it simply went out over the ocean and dropped.
They scrutinized the lowest ladder rung on the L.E.M. They made scale models and tested them by dropping into sand while moving forward to see if the rung would be an issue. Ultimately they left it off which made it more difficult for the astronauts.
Thereâs so many of these little details that never wouldâve been a concern if faked. They hung the L.E.M. upside down and shook it to get every scrap of solder, wire insulation, dirt, etc out so that stuff wasnât going to be floating around in weightlessness.
The appearance and structure of the L.E.M. wouldâve been much more orthodox if it was faked. It wouldâve looked much more in line with the publicâs perception of a spacecraft in the 60âs, not something that was thrown together at the recycling center. Imagine being the lead person on the fake LEM project and youâre taken to the secret warehouse and shown the finished project. No way would you accept it knowing youâre pulling a fast one on the American public, on the worldâs stage.
It looks the way it does because everything about its dimensions, weight and function was scrutinized with no regard for appearance or aerodynamics. Anything that didnât add to the function was omitted.
@@twocyclediesel1280 if they hadnât had the restrictions on flammables after the Apollo 1 ground fire tragedy, thru would have had sticky pads behind the consoles to grab loose debris that still didnât fall out despite the upside down shake out procedure! Also minimized was the use of Velcro because of it being a flammable item.
I have wondered if the insulation ion the point to point wiring in the panels was a Teflon coating, as it is fairly heat resistant and does not burn easily.
Question - If NASA has hired spaceX to build and launch the rocket to Lunar orbit so the NASA astronauts can get out of their NASA ship and into the spaceX ship to land and take off again, why is NASA not just putting the astronauts in the spaceX starship in the first place?
The starship is not yet approved for launching humans, hence the need for the SLS. However, as soon as it is human rated, the starship will probably be seriously considered for future human space flight to the moon.
5:47 "explore it's dark side with confidence" - There is no dark side of the Moon. The far side is still illuminated by the Sun half the time. And Artemis is aiming for the south pole, not the far side.
Not true
NASA has always managed their many missions with such high levels of proffessionalism. â.
Erm, I hate to break it to you but they really havenât and thatâs what got the challenger crew killed
@@TheDrummingWarriorhaha Mic drop.
Mixing "...the dark side of the Moon" narration, with the previous term "anti water break echo shawls" seems to be deliberate humor. No dark side. Yes water wave cancellation.
Like it very much
All of this radiation didn't seem to bother Buzz. He's still going strong today.
So this will confirm that moon isnt fake and not just a hologram? Ok
Christ, it has been an impossibly long wait. Shuttle love to blame.
Interesting to see the re-start of Manned Spaceflight to the Moon as the Artemis II crew members were named... reminds us of the 1968 Apollo 8 mission.
Exciting lunar mission program but naming it "" Mission to " Deep Space " "" was surely the wrong term here
The edge of our Solar System isn't even Deep Space!
The nearest Star at 4.2 light years isn't even Deep Space! đ€
Moon missions artmis 2 success
Little confusion as 'stage' is the name for different levels of a launch rocket.
Apollo usually three? Since there never was an official mission that didn't have three...just three, I don't get your idiotic point.
Where to begin. . .
The van Allen bekts are just a fraction of the magnetosphere. They only have a fraction of the radiation the magnetosheath has. Outside the magnetosphere is far more radiant than inside the van Allen belts.
No, we have not invented active shielding. Marco Durante of esa,nasal and gsi proved we need it but do jot have it. Passive shielding like aluminum is not able to shield outside the magnetosphere. Thus Apollo never went to the moon. It never had active shielding.
Orion is going into low earth orbit, not the moon.
@@thenewspacerace so ..the new space race would appear to be a keystone cop operation.
Just love these comments.
I'm 71, I say it seems that the SLOW moving Artemis project is just a slightly bigger version of project Apollo from the 60's. No money or appetite for going to the moon. Why can't they just sat that ? đ
Why not send robots to land? There is no need to send humans. Artemis one was unmanned and it flew the whole mission by computer so why send astronauts just to sit there for the ride? It doesn't make any sense at all, they wont be flying the mission or doing anything that automation can already do now. It's is a stunt more than anything else.
this is not orbit the moon ?
bring a strong laser and point it on earth just to confirm that the landing is real lol
Good luck and Godspeed, Capricorn One!
Damn you didnât talk about starship.. this rocket doesnât have a landing system and youâre talking about crews researching on moon surface đđ. 0 out of 10. Put a better video next time
That's why Artemis program will require a space station orbiting a moon. A modified starship will be attached to it to be used as a landing system
@@raptorwhite6468 thatâs what I want to include on this video
Starship won't be used in artemis 2
This is fake.
So why the emphasis on sending a woman to the moon, if thatâs whatâs important why not send a shemale, too?
Ah transphobia and misogyny
Nothing like some gender-quotas to science up the science.
So, two astronauts will return to Earth? What happened to the other two astronauts? 4 went up and 2 come back? Not good. I don't think you know what you are talking about.