Chris did his job with morals,he didnt stoop low and play dirty! This is a man with integrity! He didnt play with the dirty pigs! He should be praised and proud of himself for staying true to the end! Hes not a snake like the defense team!
Chris is a good man. Absolutely no one cared that his brother was dying during that case, and time he could have spent with his older brother, was spent trying to convince a biased, already mostly decided jury, that OJ Simpson murdered Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown. Chris Darden made mistakes. It was a nine month trial, there were going to be mistakes. I’ve called them out myself....but, there is no doubt that he tried his best, and sacrificed a lot.
The truth is, it would not have mattered who the prosecutors were, Darden or Clark or anyone else. There is NO WAY that jury would have found him guilty.
@@mfecankq They just wanted payback for Rodney King in any way possible. It was a race issue for them, they didn't care about the murdered victims. They weren't going to let a black man get imprisonment.
Pointless to listen to; what's he going to say? Does he even know now that he and Clark were in over their heads, should've only had supporting roles behind the scenes. Much more interesting to have spoken to Gil Garcetti and other decision makers as to why they didn't have top, savvy, experienced people in there. So many mistakes, beginning with the MASSIVE Clark error to include huge numbers of black women jurors that the defense immediately knew were gold for them and toxic to the prosecutors...why was she allowed to determine this on her own completely mistaken, arrogant hunch that she could win them over? Why was she the sole decision maker in the glove fiasco? PATHETIC AMATEURS. The defense will forever be grateful.
Charlie Rose was a heck of an interviewer! Chris Darden was treated so poorly during and after this trial, as was Marcia Clark. To watch the trial now and see all that went on is shameful
How can one convince a court or a jury that a person who killed two persons left a blood foot print and a glove used to commit the crime and threw the other glove in his house compound? It is utterly nonsense.
Yes, we do it the same way . Bugliosi is a brilliant criminal lawyer but itwouldn't have mattered . THAT jury could have been stood next to Simpson whilst he killed Ron and Nicole and they would have still let him walk . Cochran dealt the race card from the bottom of the deck and the judge lost control of the court giving the defense way too much lee-way . Marcia Clark's book is excellent . She knew from the off the jury were useless and it was hope against hope from day one
Chris Darden and Marcia Clark participated in the entire jury selection process. Bad jury, then who is to blame? Marcia and Chris! They had the power to challenge any biased juror. Blaming the jury is sour grapes from Marcia and Chris because they helped select them. They did a poor job as prosecutors and got out lawyered by Barry Scheck and Johnnie Cochran.
The problem with Darden during the trial and even with this interview is that he is too politically correct. I understand keeping integrity as a district attorney, and a lawyer and human being in general, but you take on a dirty trial like the Simpson case, you're gonna have to get dirty.
The case was lost when it was brought in central L.A. instead of Santa Monica, and Judge Lance Ito was assigned to the case, who allowed a circus to take place instead of a double-homicide trial.
I agree with you and you sound well informed . lots and lots on the internet, you just got to google around a bit . Basically all transcripts/testimonies from both trials. Read Marcia Clark . Very easy for Bugliosi to critisise after the event but reading Marcia's account gives you a real insight in just how difficult the whole thing was and what she was up against.
Yes Chris is a “good” man but California lost the trial due to the prosecution. They also threw the detectives under the bus with no objection whatsoever. I think you are right….. but if they had all these personal issues why didn’t they recuse themselves? Fame money, what else would keep a good man away from his dying brother? Clarks pancake ass?
this guy shouldn't be allowed to make money from a book after failing so miserably during the trial. he has no fire and clearly didn't want to convict oj, even said it himself.
At least he didn't try to publish a book about how he "may" have committed the murders, unlike OJ himself. OJ is the killer, not Darden. At least Darden tried his best to put a killer behind bars.
thehitchrules Bugliosi survived one of the most complicated trials of the century, the Manson murders, inculding death threats against himself with flying colors so the OJ case would have been a piece of pie for him. The guy is immune to pressure. I think he would have done a thousand times better than Clark and Darden.
If he held the trial in Santa Monica and had a mostly white or more mixed jury, he'd have won for sure. He'd know that African Americans were still bitter because of Rodney King and Latasha Harlins, so they wouldn't play fair.
Chris did his job with morals,he didnt stoop low and play dirty! This is a man with integrity! He didnt play with the dirty pigs! He should be praised and proud of himself for staying true to the end! Hes not a snake like the defense team!
Chris is the man! Full of courage,class,integrity and honesty!
And a loser
Chris is a good man. Absolutely no one cared that his brother was dying during that case, and time he could have spent with his older brother, was spent trying to convince a biased, already mostly decided jury, that OJ Simpson murdered Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown.
Chris Darden made mistakes. It was a nine month trial, there were going to be mistakes. I’ve called them out myself....but, there is no doubt that he tried his best, and sacrificed a lot.
Darden likes to complain, it’s all your fault.
Chris is the man. Classy smart good man
He CASHED in.
The truth is, it would not have mattered who the prosecutors were, Darden or Clark or anyone else. There is NO WAY that jury would have found him guilty.
And why is that Miss?
@@mfecankq They just wanted payback for Rodney King in any way possible. It was a race issue for them, they didn't care about the murdered victims. They weren't going to let a black man get imprisonment.
Pointless to listen to; what's he going to say? Does he even know now that he and Clark were in over their heads, should've only had supporting roles behind the scenes. Much more interesting to have spoken to Gil Garcetti and other decision makers as to why they didn't have top, savvy, experienced people in there. So many mistakes, beginning with the MASSIVE Clark error to include huge numbers of black women jurors that the defense immediately knew were gold for them and toxic to the prosecutors...why was she allowed to determine this on her own completely mistaken, arrogant hunch that she could win them over? Why was she the sole decision maker in the glove fiasco? PATHETIC AMATEURS. The defense will forever be grateful.
he said it defense broke many procedures and was putting too much a show but judge ito didn't call it out
Thank you for posting this, projectsweatshop.
Charlie Rose was a heck of an interviewer! Chris Darden was treated so poorly during and after this trial, as was Marcia Clark. To watch the trial now and see all that went on is shameful
How can one convince a court or a jury that a person who killed two persons left a blood foot print and a glove used to commit the crime and threw the other glove in his house compound? It is utterly nonsense.
Yes, we do it the same way . Bugliosi is a brilliant criminal lawyer but itwouldn't have mattered . THAT jury could have been stood next to Simpson whilst he killed Ron and Nicole and they would have still let him walk . Cochran dealt the race card from the bottom of the deck and the judge lost control of the court giving the defense way too much lee-way . Marcia Clark's book is excellent . She knew from the off the jury were useless and it was hope against hope from day one
Chris Darden and Marcia Clark participated in the entire jury selection process. Bad jury, then who is to blame? Marcia and Chris! They had the power to challenge any biased juror. Blaming the jury is sour grapes from Marcia and Chris because they helped select them. They did a poor job as prosecutors and got out lawyered by Barry Scheck and Johnnie Cochran.
The problem with Darden during the trial and even with this interview is that he is too politically correct. I understand keeping integrity as a district attorney, and a lawyer and human being in general, but you take on a dirty trial like the Simpson case, you're gonna have to get dirty.
I'd rather lose a case than my integrity.
The case was lost when it was brought in central L.A. instead of Santa Monica, and Judge Lance Ito was assigned to the case, who allowed a circus to take place instead of a double-homicide trial.
Chris fought this case based on things facts and evidence! True to the end!
I agree with you and you sound well informed .
lots and lots on the internet, you just got to google around a bit . Basically all transcripts/testimonies from both trials.
Read Marcia Clark . Very easy for Bugliosi to critisise after the event but reading Marcia's account gives you a real insight in just how difficult the whole thing was and what she was up against.
Yes Chris is a “good” man but California lost the trial due to the prosecution. They also threw the detectives under the bus with no objection whatsoever. I think you are right….. but if they had all these personal issues why didn’t they recuse themselves? Fame money, what else would keep a good man away from his dying brother? Clarks pancake ass?
Fair. But perhaps his work ethic was also a factor.
this guy shouldn't be allowed to make money from a book after failing so miserably during the trial. he has no fire and clearly didn't want to convict oj, even said it himself.
Exactly
At least he didn't try to publish a book about how he "may" have committed the murders, unlike OJ himself. OJ is the killer, not Darden. At least Darden tried his best to put a killer behind bars.
Prosecutors were incompetent in comparison to the scintillating Defense team F Lee Bailey and Johnny AMAZING Cochran.
So true
Yeah...I can see how he lost that case smh
thehitchrules Bugliosi survived one of the most complicated trials of the century, the Manson murders, inculding death threats against himself with flying colors so the OJ case would have been a piece of pie for him. The guy is immune to pressure. I think he would have done a thousand times better than Clark and Darden.
If he held the trial in Santa Monica and had a mostly white or more mixed jury, he'd have won for sure. He'd know that African Americans were still bitter because of Rodney King and Latasha Harlins, so they wouldn't play fair.
@@TDKiller415 that's the problem , people that think like that.
Just say racial slurs
He is a joke. Lack of trial and experience
5 41 never on the job
Darden CASHED in
Ito is a disgrace!
Yes , I've read I DID IT . Read Daniel Petronelli's book , very good also.
Chris was weak, Marcia was stronger than him.
Yep