Next time you look at the crisp, white walls of your President's home. Remember, that it will always stand as a symbol for the time Canadians cocked you. 🙂👍
You can't lose a war if you never declared it and send a small portion of your military/supplies in. If that was the case, then Spain defeated USSR, France, Britain, and America in its civil war
@Alexander Wellen you're confusing proxy/civil wars, trade conflicts, and border skirmishes with actual official wars that are confirmed by the Senate. That's like saying we're at war with Somalia, because our coast guard gets into fights with pirates or with China because of South Sea island trade/territory conflicts
It amazes me how some Americans believe that The war of 1812 was a second revolutionary war and that they didn’t lose. But in reality they lost big-time. Their war goal was the annexation of British North America. If it was truly about Americans being pressed into service they could’ve just ended the war when they found out that the uk ordered that policy stopped. But they didn’t, they wanted Canada as part of their manifest destiny and because a lot of their high-ranking officials were part of the revolutionary war and they wanted to get rid of British influence in North America altogether. In terms of economics, military and civilian policies it was an absolute disaster. If the war continued the US would’ve been bankrupt. The northern states we’re almost in rebellion against the central government and by the end of 1914 the British had blockaded the entire United States. My favourite historian on the American perspective of the war of 1812 is Donald r Hickey. He basically tells it how it is and how America really messed up. He’s also an American.
😂😂 oh my god another idiot. First off the USA came out of the war greatly. Second the US goal was never to annex Canada. How that hickey also states the war wasn’t over Canada. In fact the only nation to demand any land was the British an Indian buffer state Maine and Minnesota. Next the USA did try to end the war after orders in Council were over turned the USA agreed to the Dearborn-Prevost treaty in 1812 which was broken when General Brock attacked Detroit. And the blockade didn’t bankrupt American it was Madison’s embargo act of 1813 which stopped all trade with foreign countries. Hickey himself even admits this. The northern states weren’t in rebellion the Hartford convention didn’t speak once of leaving country they wanted less Federal control over states. Will you please read a history book on the war before you comment. In fact the British blockade was that affective. In fact Wade G. Dudley (no relation) in Splintering the Wooden Wall: The British Blockade of the United States, 1812-1815 (2), attempted to establish that the blockade was quite ineffective in punishing the United States, pointing out areas where it was weakest, such as in the South and on the Gulf Coast. He remarked that, in 1814, ‘the country as a whole was quite self-sufficient - no one starved, and the implements of war continued to be produced - its government had little money, thanks to the tremendous expenses associate with warfare, Madison's embargo, and the blockade’. The blockade, he suggested, ‘was never the overwhelmingly successful operation painted by Mahan and numerous other historians’. But, paradoxically, this was a time of resurgence and renewal for the American military, who performed well in campaigns at Niagara and at Plattsburg, maintained control of Lake Erie, stood firm on Lake Ontario, and won a crucial battle on Lake Champlain. Despite British amphibious attacks on the shores of Chesapeake Bay, the burning of Washington and the ransoming of Alexandria, Baltimore's naval and militia defenders repulsed the British who withdrew quickly from the Chesapeake to shift their attention to New Orleans. The one major element Arthur does not seriously account for is American privateering enterprise, which was successful in both naval and financial terms, despite the blockade. Privateer owners were an interesting blend of profit-minded entrepreneurs and patriotic sea warriors. To license and hold them accountable, the government issued 517 commissions for privateer and letter of marque vessels, which captured 1,345 British prizes and inflicted an estimated $45.5 million in damage on the British merchant fleet. The privateers sallied forth from Massachusetts, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Virginia, Louisiana, and Georgia. Indeed, many of the sailors who formerly had manned trading vessels signed on as privateersmen in major ports from Portsmouth to New Orleans. The large numbers of these swift-sailing, highly maneuverable schooners and brigs which slipped through the blockade, were a continuing irritation to the blockade commanders as they harried British convoys from the West Indies and took the war even to the chops of the Channel. Arthur minimizes the privateers' efforts as having little impact on Britain's aggregate overseas trade but whether by this he means global or North Atlantic trade he does not say. He balances the losses to privateers and American naval vessels by pointing out that the United States lost 1,407 merchantmen to the Royal Navy. But by this comparison, American privateers did fairly well. www.rfrajola.com/WalskeB3/B3b.pdf
Love the animation vibe, it's so cool! Your illustrations of Canada and the UK are weird though, Canada just occasionally turns up. Also its "ko burn", British English is odd 🤷♂️😅
@@jesuschrist9513 The US failed in its goal and was the one who declared war. Britain was defending and did that perfectly. Vietnam was completely taken over by the Communists, so the US clearly lost
Henrik Fitch nope the USA got its objectives. The war was never over Canada. Plus I love how you brits act like America just declared war for no reason the British are supporting the natives on the frontier impressing sailors and stopping trade. The USA got the British to end its ties with the natives. And ended impressment and the orders in council were repealed. You also seem to forget the british land demands during the war an I didn’t buffer state Maine And Minnesota. Britain even lost her own natives allies during the war during the treaty of Greenville (1814). Sorry Britain didn’t win nor did the USA.
@@guillermoaguadogodoy5068 Firstly, the effects of the main buildings burning down were negligible. Secondly, we burned down Toronto, which everyone forgets. Thirdly, no borders, strategic positions, or policies were really changed. That's what we call a STALEMATE.
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile in Europe plenty of wars like this happened, but the term is "status quo antebellum" (basically no border changes). Sure, burning the White House had no true effects, but, having the presidencial building burnt. Im not saying that war meant absolutely anything, because it didnt, buy if anyone had the win there, they would be the british
@@guillermoaguadogodoy5068 Strategically, the U.S. managing to hold its own against the British Empire was incredibly important. From that point on, the U.S.'s position on the continent, and a while later beyond it, only strengthened. It proved to the British, our main rival, that winning a war with the U.S. was a costly endeavor, if it was doable at all. It prompted the U.S. to (at least somewhat) improve our military. From a political sense, I'd actually consider it a U.S. victory, which meant far, far more than a few buildings in the long run.
Actually, Canada did exist at the time just not necessary as an independent nation. It was made up of Upper Canada(Southern Ontario) and Lower Canada(Southern Quebec). Though, I will admit that we needed support from Britain.
And what did the British gain out of the war other than a lost Ally and a bunch of dead soldiers and an entire fleet and destroyed city and the lose of the great lakes to show for it?
@@Demicleas nope they USA was a small player on the world so they didn’t need them and plus we burn the White House got our troops trained and another win
Toronto burnt to the ground and land is gained, British forts are abandoned, Impressment is stoped and kidnapped US citizens are returned to America Kinda forgetting this
The British stopped supporting native groups along the border, and Tecumseh's Confederacy was defeated. Impressment stopped being an issue after Napoleons defeat, so it was a dead cause. The invasions of Canada failed. The burning of Washington (which was essentially a few buildings in a swamp at the time) was retaliation for the burning of York. Also burning a capital ≠ automatic victory. Of the 3 war goals, 1 was accomplished, 1 was a failure, and 1 was no longer an issue. 3 British invasions were defeated and no territory was ceded or gained, as per status quo ante bellum. The most popular view is that the war was a draw/stalemate, which is supported by the Treaty of Ghent.
@@chadm1937 no territory was ceded nor gained because Britain had no money, they had reached their largest debt in the entire history of England at the time. That’s why they just burned the capital to the ground instead of holding it hostage like the EIC did in Manila. They had many successful invasions and could’ve kept going, but they had already decided it was too costly before the Treaty of Ghent was even signed. Britain clearly just wanted the USA to stfu and stop attacking them. The fact that the USA’s goal of annexing Canada ended with them defending their own land is nowhere near a stalemate Tell me, if Ukraine were to not only repulse Russias invasion, but also burn Moscow to the ground, would you consider this a stalemate if Russia managed to keep the same borders? Because their goal was to annex ukraine, and it’s ended in their humiliation
Back then, British and Canadian were pretty much the same. Canada was just a colony. A big ol' "province". Most of those British soldiers ended up becoming what you'd call Canadians.
I feel like people exaggerate how important the burning of D.C. was when it was still a town under construction. Nothing more than a setback. The US was pretty weak at the time and D.C. was barely the capital only by name.
America: wants to control Canada America: gets absolutely clapped at every attempt of invading whilst Britain simultaneously beats Napoleon Americans today: We WoN tHe WaR oF 1812
U.S.A: Lol were going to invade Canada? There soon nice I'll bet that they'll offer us some poutine give up there land and be loyal to us *2 Seconds later* "Sir the Canadians set the white house is on fire, Where losing the war, And Britain is siding with Canada"
@@loko8187 pretty much everyone in upper and lower canada were British because the 2 canadas were Britain's puppet we were and still are somewhat a british state even though we have distanced ourselves more and more, upper canada and lower canada were formed in 1791 so technically yes canadians burnt down the white house it was pre canadas independence in 1867 but it was still called canada
@@csgsavagebanana8102 The force that attacked D.C. sailed from England, there is supposed evidence colonial troops of the Canadas were at Bladensburg, but not at D.C.
I just finished laughing at an prauger U video where they tried convince people that the US "won" in Vietnam and then this video popped up Glad to see some actual history instead of the propaganda prauger U makes
Why is this LIE repeated over and over. Canada was a British colony at the time and became a "country " in 1867. People seem to think Britain and Canada are interchangeable at that time. Sloppy history research
www.patreon.com/LoganProductions
No
Yes.
@@ScottishMeetBall Non
@@ladofthedamned7796 oui
Sí
“Who won? hard to say, but definitely not the natives” US history in a nutshell
Nice user image comrade!!
Miguel Martin and to you as well comrade
Also Canada history in general
Are you asking this ? Absolutely Canada win they burn your capital 🤣🤣
@@voltzz7499 it was a stalemate lol
Britain: punches:
*Hits Native American*
America punches:
*Hits Native American*
Spain: "Can you guys chill for a minute?"
*Gets punched*
Spain: *Rapes Native American*
Yeah, not like the Spanish were saints to the native Americans either
@@Chikinbokbok Yeah but at least you can see the effect of the Indian Laws to this day
@@SteelRed131 true, but it would still be the same if Spain was in charge of them.
Canadians during peace: *animal crossing*
Canadians during war: *doom eternal*
America anytime: *call of duty modern warfare*
America now: GTA V
America in the future: fallout 4
@@thelastgamer7483 hey, at least it's not fallout 76
The war was mostly fought with British forces.
Jane Bennetto nobody asked
US to the military: come on, let's go 20 minute adventure
Aw geez
your comment aged really well with the whole 20 year afghanistan thing
Next time you look at the crisp, white walls of your President's home. Remember, that it will always stand as a symbol for the time Canadians cocked you. 🙂👍
If you a president you can say British men burned down your house
Or just ask the Canadian premiere if they burnt it somehow, like a bloody wimp
Well British men did burn it
"Hello? 911? Yes, hi, some British soldiers burned down my house. Yes, I'll need police and firefighters, thank you."
So nobody's gonna talk about general Cockburn's name?
🤔🤣
Why do you think he burned the Cs
Sounds like a Urinary Tract Infection
It suits him
I’m Canadian, and I still don’t know why we turn into a bunch of bloodthirsty psychopaths whenever we’re at war
Also whenever at hockey
To make up for trying to be nice most of the time
The cold and the maple syurp is the reason
I think you are basically saying sorry to Canada.
Native Americans: bruh
US government: WHO WON? WHO'S NEXT? YOU DECIDE!
EPIC RAP BATTLE OF HISTORY
“Merica won, Mexico next”- James Polk
USA: I will never Lose a war after that again!
Vietnam: dangerous foreshadowing kiddo
You can't lose a war if you never declared it and send a small portion of your military/supplies in.
If that was the case, then Spain defeated USSR, France, Britain, and America in its civil war
@@compatriot852 thats called a Proxy War
@Alexander Wellen which korea
@Alexander Wellen Yes,infect countries just don't declare war anymore nowadays.
@Alexander Wellen you're confusing proxy/civil wars, trade conflicts, and border skirmishes with actual official wars that are confirmed by the Senate.
That's like saying we're at war with Somalia, because our coast guard gets into fights with pirates or with China because of South Sea island trade/territory conflicts
*another victory to the mighty General Cockburn*
Feel the burrrrrn
Britain:
*"I B E G Y O U R P A R D O N? "* - ing since, well, the dawn of time.
Canada like almost all the time: Come in, were having BBQ.
Canada during war: Ima end this mans whole career
Poutine and Michael Cera is a deadly combination
We just want more tims coffee shops in America
Last time I was this early San Marino wasn't a thing
That's pretty heckin early
Damn. That's pretty early.
1:30 you also forgot that Canada has Tim Hortons. That's worth invading Canada in my opinion.
Joseph Scott you also can't forget poutine too
Tim hortons is a piece of shit if you've lived here for more than 4 years.
You can’t burn my palace
We can try. You can't stop all of us!
@@grovemeister04 *nukes us all*
Great video!
yay! new video!
The time we got clapped
Well it's called the war of 1812 because... it started in 1812
And because "The Pointless War" doesn't play well in history books
It amazes me how some Americans believe that The war of 1812 was a second revolutionary war and that they didn’t lose. But in reality they lost big-time. Their war goal was the annexation of British North America. If it was truly about Americans being pressed into service they could’ve just ended the war when they found out that the uk ordered that policy stopped. But they didn’t, they wanted Canada as part of their manifest destiny and because a lot of their high-ranking officials were part of the revolutionary war and they wanted to get rid of British influence in North America altogether. In terms of economics, military and civilian policies it was an absolute disaster. If the war continued the US would’ve been bankrupt. The northern states we’re almost in rebellion against the central government and by the end of 1914 the British had blockaded the entire United States. My favourite historian on the American perspective of the war of 1812 is Donald r Hickey. He basically tells it how it is and how America really messed up. He’s also an American.
😂😂 oh my god another idiot. First off the USA came out of the war greatly. Second the US goal was never to annex Canada. How that hickey also states the war wasn’t over Canada. In fact the only nation to demand any land was the British an Indian buffer state Maine and Minnesota. Next the USA did try to end the war after orders in Council were over turned the USA agreed to the Dearborn-Prevost treaty in 1812 which was broken when General Brock attacked Detroit. And the blockade didn’t bankrupt American it was Madison’s embargo act of 1813 which stopped all trade with foreign countries. Hickey himself even admits this. The northern states weren’t in rebellion the Hartford convention didn’t speak once of leaving country they wanted less Federal control over states. Will you please read a history book on the war before you comment. In fact the British blockade was that affective. In fact Wade G. Dudley (no relation) in Splintering the Wooden Wall: The British Blockade of the United States, 1812-1815 (2), attempted to establish that the blockade was quite ineffective in punishing the United States, pointing out areas where it was weakest, such as in the South and on the Gulf Coast. He remarked that, in 1814, ‘the country as a whole was quite self-sufficient - no one starved, and the implements of war continued to be produced - its government had little money, thanks to the tremendous expenses associate with warfare, Madison's embargo, and the blockade’. The blockade, he suggested, ‘was never the overwhelmingly successful operation painted by Mahan and numerous other historians’. But, paradoxically, this was a time of resurgence and renewal for the American military, who performed well in campaigns at Niagara and at Plattsburg, maintained control of Lake Erie, stood firm on Lake Ontario, and won a crucial battle on Lake Champlain. Despite British amphibious attacks on the shores of Chesapeake Bay, the burning of Washington and the ransoming of Alexandria, Baltimore's naval and militia defenders repulsed the British who withdrew quickly from the Chesapeake to shift their attention to New Orleans. The one major element Arthur does not seriously account for is American privateering enterprise, which was successful in both naval and financial terms, despite the blockade. Privateer owners were an interesting blend of profit-minded entrepreneurs and patriotic sea warriors. To license and hold them accountable, the government issued 517 commissions for privateer and letter of marque vessels, which captured 1,345 British prizes and inflicted an estimated $45.5 million in damage on the British merchant fleet. The privateers sallied forth from Massachusetts, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Virginia, Louisiana, and Georgia. Indeed, many of the sailors who formerly had manned trading vessels signed on as privateersmen in major ports from Portsmouth to New Orleans. The large numbers of these swift-sailing, highly maneuverable schooners and brigs which slipped through the blockade, were a continuing irritation to the blockade commanders as they harried British convoys from the West Indies and took the war even to the chops of the Channel. Arthur minimizes the privateers' efforts as having little impact on Britain's aggregate overseas trade but whether by this he means global or North Atlantic trade he does not say. He balances the losses to privateers and American naval vessels by pointing out that the United States lost 1,407 merchantmen to the Royal Navy. But by this comparison, American privateers did fairly well.
www.rfrajola.com/WalskeB3/B3b.pdf
Infact here is Donald Hickey czcams.com/video/GrCzcI0_JaY/video.html
And btw manifest destiny didn’t start until 1845.
Spain: Supports the natives
America: Claps them in war 80 years later
Hope the next 8bit kaiserreich part is soon. But I can wait for it tbh.
That big storm that he mentioned had a tornado
Love the animation vibe, it's so cool! Your illustrations of Canada and the UK are weird though, Canada just occasionally turns up. Also its "ko burn", British English is odd 🤷♂️😅
You should make a video on the six day war.
Can you do a updated TNO lore video because its been fully released
If America lost to some rice farmers then Britain lost to peasants with hunting rifles twice in a row, period.
Nah, we won.
@@henrikfitch4017 Britain pulled out after annihilating the US because public opinion back home was sour, same deal with the US and Vietnam
@@jesuschrist9513 The US failed in its goal and was the one who declared war.
Britain was defending and did that perfectly.
Vietnam was completely taken over by the Communists, so the US clearly lost
Henrik Fitch nope the USA got its objectives. The war was never over Canada. Plus I love how you brits act like America just declared war for no reason the British are supporting the natives on the frontier impressing sailors and stopping trade. The USA got the British to end its ties with the natives. And ended impressment and the orders in council were repealed. You also seem to forget the british land demands during the war an I didn’t buffer state Maine And Minnesota. Britain even lost her own natives allies during the war during the treaty of Greenville (1814). Sorry Britain didn’t win nor did the USA.
American did not win this war and u seem to forget the American revolution was helped by the french
how weird is it that it was recommended right after the march on the capital
Bruh moment
Canada is polite until they aren't
as a Canadian i chose to believe we did burn it down
You didn't, anyway all you Canadians were British anyway.
@@cpj93070 typical yank ignorance.
@@romulusmariuscaesar9716e’s not
American typical Canuck arrogance
@@TheIceman567 your just salty you lost the war
@@romulusmariuscaesar9716 salty about what? The USA achieved its objectives just cope🤷♂️
4:42
A pointless end to a pointless war.
In 1814 we took a little trip...
DOWN THE MISSISSIPPI TO NEW ORLEANS
Well I suppose you need a good song to cheer you up after losing a war in such a manor.
@@fredbreadbun6277 who lost?
Fred Breadbun Whatever makes you sleep at night.
@@braxtonjones6163 are u american?
Everytime an American calls Canada soft I remind them of this
How do you make your characters?
Canada does bad things?!
*_Impossible_*
Nice
Great jarb canoodian
When people say the US “won” the war of 1812
I mean, most of us say that we didn't lose, which is true. It was an absolute stalemate.
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile i wouldnt say that burning your main buldings of your capital as a stalemate
@@guillermoaguadogodoy5068 Firstly, the effects of the main buildings burning down were negligible. Secondly, we burned down Toronto, which everyone forgets. Thirdly, no borders, strategic positions, or policies were really changed. That's what we call a STALEMATE.
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile in Europe plenty of wars like this happened, but the term is "status quo antebellum" (basically no border changes). Sure, burning the White House had no true effects, but, having the presidencial building burnt. Im not saying that war meant absolutely anything, because it didnt, buy if anyone had the win there, they would be the british
@@guillermoaguadogodoy5068 Strategically, the U.S. managing to hold its own against the British Empire was incredibly important. From that point on, the U.S.'s position on the continent, and a while later beyond it, only strengthened. It proved to the British, our main rival, that winning a war with the U.S. was a costly endeavor, if it was doable at all. It prompted the U.S. to (at least somewhat) improve our military. From a political sense, I'd actually consider it a U.S. victory, which meant far, far more than a few buildings in the long run.
I thought the White House incident was purportedly an accident? Judging by both sides reactions and an account of what supposedly happen
*Britain
Canada didn't exist nor did the idea of it existed.
Actually, Canada did exist at the time just not necessary as an independent nation. It was made up of Upper Canada(Southern Ontario) and Lower Canada(Southern Quebec). Though, I will admit that we needed support from Britain.
@@arandomcanadian4179 You Canadians were all British except the people from Quebec, FACT.
Short Answer: Canada
Long Answer: Britain
Real answer: nobody
And what did the British gain out of the war other than a lost Ally and a bunch of dead soldiers and an entire fleet and destroyed city and the lose of the great lakes to show for it?
@@Demicleas nope they USA was a small player on the world so they didn’t need them and plus we burn the White House got our troops trained and another win
General Cockburn... sounds painful
bruh
@@LoganProductions yeah I know, I beat myself up for making the joke lol
It seems like the entire theme of the war was just “there was no texting back then so no one knew what was going on”
US: *fails to meet strategic objectives* *gets capitol burnt down* *gets extensively blockaded* Hmm yeah I think we won this one guys
Toronto burnt to the ground and land is gained, British forts are abandoned, Impressment is stoped and kidnapped US citizens are returned to America
Kinda forgetting this
The British stopped supporting native groups along the border, and Tecumseh's Confederacy was defeated.
Impressment stopped being an issue after Napoleons defeat, so it was a dead cause.
The invasions of Canada failed.
The burning of Washington (which was essentially a few buildings in a swamp at the time) was retaliation for the burning of York. Also burning a capital ≠ automatic victory.
Of the 3 war goals, 1 was accomplished, 1 was a failure, and 1 was no longer an issue. 3 British invasions were defeated and no territory was ceded or gained, as per status quo ante bellum. The most popular view is that the war was a draw/stalemate, which is supported by the Treaty of Ghent.
@@chadm1937 no territory was ceded nor gained because Britain had no money, they had reached their largest debt in the entire history of England at the time. That’s why they just burned the capital to the ground instead of holding it hostage like the EIC did in Manila. They had many successful invasions and could’ve kept going, but they had already decided it was too costly before the Treaty of Ghent was even signed.
Britain clearly just wanted the USA to stfu and stop attacking them. The fact that the USA’s goal of annexing Canada ended with them defending their own land is nowhere near a stalemate
Tell me, if Ukraine were to not only repulse Russias invasion, but also burn Moscow to the ground, would you consider this a stalemate if Russia managed to keep the same borders? Because their goal was to annex ukraine, and it’s ended in their humiliation
*Sad Washington D.C. Noises*
Canada wasn't Canada back then so it would be kindof a stretch to say Canada fought the US it was a British colony
Not just that- there were Canadian colonial troops in D.C.
@@peterson7082but there is little evidence to say that they burned down the white house.
@@Demicleas Though I poorly worded it, that was my point.
Canada taking credit for British accomplishments once again
Back then, British and Canadian were pretty much the same. Canada was just a colony. A big ol' "province". Most of those British soldiers ended up becoming what you'd call Canadians.
Yep, cuz we were the British at that time. Hence the U.E.L.
I'll be showing this to my 6 Yr old Son. Education is key.
Who won? Nobody. Who lost? Everyone.
Joseph Scott literally said everyone lost you fucking waste of seamen.
No, the Natives lost, not everyone.
I feel like people exaggerate how important the burning of D.C. was when it was still a town under construction. Nothing more than a setback. The US was pretty weak at the time and D.C. was barely the capital only by name.
American compensationing for something
@@mongolianares hm?
Making the president homeless wasn’t a good look, he was getting turned down when trying to find refuge lol
We made ships just so we can fight in a lake that’s funny and quite petty
America: wants to control Canada
America: gets absolutely clapped at every attempt of invading whilst Britain simultaneously beats Napoleon
Americans today: We WoN tHe WaR oF 1812
😂😂 you got that so wrong. Shall I educate you?
What crack are you smoking and where can I get some?
Compatriot crack is wack bro
That wasn't the point of the war
what are you talking about the British is always the good guys
Not when they kidnap innocent American sailors, nope.
@@RedefinedReality And freed slaves in America
@@thebiggamers999 and forced civilians into military servidude.
@@Demicleas literally every county has done it or is doing it....
@@RedefinedReality kidnap their own men were trying to leave the navy and trying to go to another country if u did this in ww1 u would be shot
wow im early asf to this video
sorry
U.S.A: Lol were going to invade Canada? There soon nice I'll bet that they'll offer us some poutine give up there land and be loyal to us
*2 Seconds later*
"Sir the Canadians set the white house is on fire, Where losing the war, And Britain is siding with Canada"
Canada didn’t burn the White House 🙄
@@TheIceman567 Its a joke dumbass.
@@splatter0019 not what your momma called my last night 😉
@@TheIceman567 it would be a big 180 if their mom was dead
Not really the case
Isnt it funny that canada has never lost a war
Canada will conquer the whole world! >:D
thelastgamer 748 not if Sweden does it first... ooh maybe Sweden and Canada should become the empire of swedocanada!
Canada has lost a war.
Somebody say Chungus?
Yes Big Lord Chungus.
Which Treaty if Paris?
Good video defeaneatly not an in depth guide on the war of 1812 but as a beginner guide its ok
Did you partially read a Wikipedia article?
Why isn't anyone talking about Chadboi Cockburn?
I’m sure that the British people who did that where now days Canadian
No they weren’t
They sailed from England.
Nathan Peterson Ik that tell the person up there
Stupid Pink huh?
TheIceman567 ur so stupid that’s u didn’t know that the white people in Canada is British decent
Y'all Americans don't know this but, we have nuclear weapons.
From the looks of things you didn't, now go back to chugging liquid diabetus.
Darem Rouzes no you don’t have nukes.
@@TheIceman567 You don't understand, we have Nuclear Weapons.
MaziReich Mapper no you don’t.
Alright gentlemen even if we tell them they don't believe us. Victory is ours.
dab on burgers
Yeah we burned down the white house eh
Pinko
It was Britain. Not Canada.
Edit: just got to the part where he said there’s no reliable source and that it’s clickbait. Nvm lol
Haydn Dailey back then Britain and Canada were the same country I think
It wasn't canada it was lower canada and upper canada so yes and no.
They where BRITISH from BRITAIN
@@loko8187 pretty much everyone in upper and lower canada were British because the 2 canadas were Britain's puppet we were and still are somewhat a british state even though we have distanced ourselves more and more, upper canada and lower canada were formed in 1791 so technically yes canadians burnt down the white house it was pre canadas independence in 1867 but it was still called canada
@@csgsavagebanana8102 The force that attacked D.C. sailed from England, there is supposed evidence colonial troops of the Canadas were at Bladensburg, but not at D.C.
Can't have Detroit in shit
Canada didn't burn (down) the White House - Britain did. The burning was in retaliation for American troops burning Toronto.
We were already Upper & Lower CANADA then: CANADIANS burned it down!
Lmao the British "freed" american slaves. More like switch plants.
Canada became a country in 1867, we didn't burn anything
azzhole
To make it fair let’s say there was british soldiers and Canadian militia
This game of civ 5 is wack
Canada didn't exist. The leader of the troops was Scottish, the troops themselves were English.
Northern Irish
canada will conquer the world
“Free Healthcare” for Canada translates to “Free Suicide Booth”.
The russians did the same
I just finished laughing at an prauger U video where they tried convince people that the US "won" in Vietnam and then this video popped up
Glad to see some actual history instead of the propaganda prauger U makes
This one felt like you shifted your script slightly to appeal to a younger demographic.
Is the 🇬🇧 won the war
No it ended in stalemate
Your destroyed navy and the lose of the great lakes would disagree.
@@Demicleas and ur army’s with more men getting kick out of Canada or ur White House on fire what say the same
Fun fact: Canada has never lost a war.
It has
Joseph Scott wrong ca ada lost the Russian civil war
Haha big chungus we did it reddit epic gamer women elon musk & keeanu reeves epic XDDDDDD
Dislike for Big Chungus
No one cares!
Not going to lie, really didn’t like this clickbait.
We were not buddy buddy ...we are called Patriotes and are french canadian
Why is this LIE repeated over and over. Canada was a British colony at the time and became a "country " in 1867. People seem to think Britain and Canada are interchangeable at that time. Sloppy history research
Nice