Schrödinger's cat: A thought experiment in quantum mechanics - Chad Orzel
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 10. 2014
- View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/schrodinger...
Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, posed this famous question: If you put a cat in a sealed box with a device that has a 50% chance of killing the cat in the next hour, what will be the state of the cat when that time is up? Chad Orzel investigates this thought experiment.
Lesson by Chad Orzel, animation by Agota Vegso.
I love how schrodinger discovered the fundamentals of quantum mechanics and then just went "this is bs, im doing biology now"
As you advance in any field, the boundaries between them start to frazzle and knowledge and interest become monolithic. He never changed subjects, just focus.
most of science is just bs that just makes the most sense of all the sea of bs
Valid
bababoeey whats bs
Not true cat actually makes sound from time to time so if you woudl stand close to the box you would know wheter the cat is dead or alive, no superposition.
Everybody at schrodinger’s funeral: *hmmm*
both dead and alive until the casket is opened
*DUN DUN DUUUUN*
Schrodinger:I don't know if cat is dead or alive
Cat:meow!
Schrodinger:shut up!
@@frazzydoof770 technically since he did not die in the box this is not correct let me explain he was dead before hand so he would not have a chance to be alive if the box is opened there is only one outcome in that instance also his funeral was open casket so no schrodinger's cat theory was used on the funeral but you didn't know that so technically this was a schrodinger's cat theory example his funeral had a 50% chance of being open casket and a 50% chance of not me telling you it was opens the box to find your cat alive glad i saw your comment made me exercise my brain a bit 😁
@@hydro3672 It's a joke, but wow, that's a good way to exercise a brain.
A lot of people in the comments are missing the point. The point isn't "we don't know until we open the box". The point is that the cat IS both alive and dead until we open the box, which forces it into a definite state of one or the other.
The point is that our interaction (which is a placeholder for measurements in physics) influences the outcome and changes the behavior of the entity being interacted with/measured into a definite state.
So is the cat ded or alive? Am damb
Thanks. Your comment made it very easy to understand.
Forgive me but I've always been very confused about Schrodinger's Cat. How can something be both dead, and alive, simultaneously? If, to be alive, we must be consciously aware, have a heartbeat, etc., how can it be that we both have and lack consciousness, a pulse, and the like experiences? Schrodinger stipulates in his thought experiment that there is a 50 percent chance that the cat will be alive after the hour, and a fifty percent chance that it won't be alive after an hour. How does our interaction influence the outcome of the scenario? It seems to me that whether or not the cat is alive or dead is not ontologically significant. The cat's being alive is only epistemically significant, it seems to me. By that I mean that whether or not we observe the cat makes no difference as to whether or not the cat is dead or alive. It only matters insofar as we can *know* that the cat is dead, or alive. Is this not the case? And, if Schrodinger's Cat is only epistemically significant, why is that point not emphasized? It seems they threaten the fallacy of equivocation by not specifiying.
Maybe I'm just missing the point. I don't pretend to be well-understood insofar as science is concerned (let alone a physicist), and I admire those who are. I would appreciate someone simplifying the Schrodinger's Cat thought experiment to the level of a child, while retaining its precise meaning, for me.
@@Rspknlikeab0ssxd the thought experiment is not about the cat but the fact that until we directly observe the object, the object is it two states at once when talking about quantum mechanics as far as I understand it. The cat could just as easily be a coin with a machine that flips it inside the box. Is the coin on heads or tails? No, the coin is one ~both~ heads & tails until we observe it according to quantum mechanics.
@@jinolin9062 So then, as I am understanding what you're saying, quantum mechanics is inconsistent on logical grounds. For, it is inconsistent for something to be both alive and dead, heads and tails, be or not be, yes and no, etc. simultaneously.
You could show me this video like 10times and even if i payed real attention to it i could never understand it to the point where i would be able to explain it to someone. This is beyond the intellectual skills i could ever conquer in my whole life.
The reason why you should be afraid of physics and chemistry
I heard one famous scientist said if you find science boring, you’re learning from the wrong teacher. It’s either he doesn’t want you to learn or he doesn’t fully understand himself, explaining like an AI.
@@safaeit This isn't about finding science boring (well perhaps for this person it might be), it's about understanding it
I really dont understand intellectual but ok
In fairness it's dumbed down to the point it forgets to explain anything
Shakespeare: “To be or not to be...”
Schrodinger: “To be and* not to be...”
Schrodinger: "To be or not to be" *and I took that personally*
Scooby : Dobeedoobeedoo
@@alchemist2048
😂😂😂
answer of every great question is a paradox
@@aditya-rt4zb almost like everything and its opposite exist
Wanted Schrödinger's cat : Dead and Alive
Simple Cormac this would make a cool t-shirt
This comment is underrated
I HAVE A BOOK THAT SAYS THAT!!!!!
please make this into a poster
Last seen inside a box
"I don't know if the *cat* is dead or alive until I open the box"
"Meow"
"Shut up"
Let's appreciate the quality of animation used to design and explain quantum mechanics in a better way. It's extremely helpful for all the students studying it in academics. Good job :)
Good review lol❤
Me: So, is the cat alive?
Schrödinger: Well yes, but actually no.
*Nice Meme*
*Maybe, maybe not*
Schrodinger's cat went criminal. Now he is wanted, dead *and* alive!
Should’ve said Well yes AND actually no
@@humbertojimmy Good song
"To be or not to be, that is the question" - Schrödinger's cat
Tom Almog 😂😂 ok I’ll admit I kinda laughed
OMG man!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
To be AND not to be
Confused cat noises
I would love a video on Schrödinger's "What is life?" answer. The definition he gave is one of the most beautiful and profound things I have ever heard
2:25 I’m learning this right now. Suppose you put a detector on both sides of the slits that detect which side the particle is coming from. It will not act as a wave function anymore, but as a particle. Take away the detectors and then it acts as the wave functions again. Quantum physics/mechanics is cool.
Isn't it a phenomenon
ohh yea the good old double slit Exp
is it because the observer affects the outcome itself ?
my father explained it to me cause he's obsessed with physics and i think its really cool
@@mohamedalhusni6255You can think it in this way
When the particle doesn't interact with matter it acts like a wave.
But when it interacts with matter it behaves like a particle
Disclaimer: I may or may not be correct
Your crush actually likes you and doesn't like you at the same time, until your curiosity makes you approach her.
... then she rejects you and you're dead inside while being alive
Hmmm.... I was not able to understand the video ... Until I saw this comment ... Thnx btw
Nice!
Oh man! You really made the concept very easy! True genius exists here! Love you brother!😁😁
@peeps hi whyever not?
Schrödinger’s Cat walked into a bar.
and doesn’t.
Zenorita copied
@@25arushbhatnagar56 Copied who? Cmon' man don't leave us on a cliffhanger
@@25arushbhatnagar56 Yup
Cant believe I laughed at this
this grammar is killing me
I watched this video first years ago as a child who was baffled by this; now, in my second year of my undergrad maths course studying quantum mechanics as one of my courses, this makes so much more sense!
Brilliant. Stick in
I've been puzzled by this for so long I needed to watch this. Explained it to me so well it seems really simple
schrödinger: doctor, how is my cat doing?
doctor: i've got good news and bad news...
lmao
😂😂😂
Good news OR bad news
Doctor: ur cat is half dead and half alive
Schrödinger: That means my cat is in a superposition
@Orion D. Hunter lmao😂❤️❤️❤️
Is schrödinger trying to explain “I don’t know” with science
Yesnt
This is so easy, he just made a logical thing into something very scientific
the answer is yes and no at the same time. The only way to find the reality is to go and ask him.
@@watertommyz I hate you 😂
damn fr!
This is one of the channel who help me to understand educational concepts. Nice explanation!
True. It simplifies ideas ahead making it easy for one know what/how to learn.
If we place these explanations Schrodinger's Cat and Quantum Mechanics into my brain, it melts.
I will act like I understood everything
If anyone says they fully understand ...
You lie
@not Funny I know ...not funny😾😺
You need to act, to understand something
It’s yes and no at the same time
@not Funny no it its more, if didn't understand quantum physics mean you understood.
I understood the word "cat."
What's a cat?
@@-yourandyoureare2different612 An antidog.
@@-yourandyoureare2different612 That's China's main food source
@@-yourandyoureare2different612 love you're username
Chad
이번 영상으로 슈뢰딩거의 고양이 실험을 제대로 이해한 기분이 듭니다. 각종 미디어에서 많이 다루는 주제이지만 대부분의 사람들이 잘못 알고 있는 실험인데, 저 같이 양자역학을 공부하지 않은 사람도 이해할 수 있게 영상을 만들어주셔서 감사합니다. 좋은 영상 감사합니다!
This is either chinese or english.. or both
@@dougdoan9190 both wrong cuz its actually korean
@@anneclaudia1491 you just broke physics
@@dougdoan9190 This is rasist and not.
Seeing this after studying wave optics in school and heard of this experiment in the big bang theory, science and universe is so vast and great, we never know enough and that's incredible
Schrodinger: there is no way that you can tell if the cat is alive or dead without opening the box
Cat: *meow*
Schrödinger: ...
😂😂
Ok cat is alive
Actually it's more like observing which can be by hearing, seeing........etc
This is the best!
Proceeds to shoot the cat
so if you open the box and the cat is dead, then your curiosity killed the cat
It is not like that , it is more like , the cat is already dead and alive but you are able to see one of them.
The joke
Your head
Renee Claude My dog is named Curiosity
Even if you dont look, its either dead or alive so for instance if you dont look and its dead you just never know but its dead anyway. I mean our observation wont determine the cats situation right? That takes place anyway wether we look or we dont look.
Or, y'know,
The curiosity killed *your* cat
Amazing explanation. Thank you.
Great explanation. Thanks for sharing.
Guess what the comment was by reading replies.
Yes! And No! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
dont call me out like that... 😅😂
Lmao that is so true for me rn. I am meant to be doing english but im learning science with this vid
I often watch how to be productive videos instead of being productive
@Maselek yeah.
My mom: you room is a mess
Me: mom, that’s the superposition of the atoms. Until you opened the door my room was a non existence state. So is a mess and is clean at the same time.
My mom:
caytlin100 my mom: smacks the superposition out of me😂😂😂
You have future kid 😂
Mom response :👊👊👊🖐👊
😂😂 lmaoooo
Your mom: no internet for the rest of your life and 24/7 grounded
I used Google translate to produce several recording of this explanation, including in; Yiddish, Swahili and Urdu. I then played them backwards, simultaneously. It made the whole thing so much easier to understand.
Excellent explanation really
That moment when you drop your iPhone face down. It's both cracked and not cracked at the same time until you check.
LOL, quantum theory orientated jokes another thing to thank Schrödinger and his geeky science associates for ,oh the wonders of theoretical science hahaha : )
Iphone is always cracked when it falls down, and is a disproof of quantum theories...
i've dropped my phone at least three times and it is never cracked. therefore, the comment above me is incorrect amd pointless.
Jade Harley Classic case of experiment measurement error
+bball33g Schrödinger's Iphone must have had a rough life :(
This is like the mystery of wether or not the refrigerator light stays on when the door is closed
It's on AND off until you open the door.
It's off because when you close it it hits the button at closing angle...
Schroeder cat poem
Me as a kid. I would peek and close the fridge door very slowly until I realized there's an actual switch🤦♀️
@@mr.knightthedetective7435 r/woooooosh
This means we should close our loved once in a box and leave them there and as long as we dont open it, they are gonna be with us forever.
Well done, you just invented a coffin
Schrodinger's cat : No dogs are harmed in this experiment.
So, did the cat survive?
Schrödinger:Yesn't.
And so was the exclamation "yesn't" invented 👍
“So is the cat alive or dead?”
Schrödinger: *yes*
Stolen comment
You are so addicted to likes that you steal comments to feel good about yourself.
Yesn't
@@banjomcgee6333 dayum
Perhaps
Awesome work!
3:16 An atom in two different ordits seems wierd, but two ordits can be in one place and the atom can ordit both of them. Means the two nucleus are spinning and atom is standing in one place. That explains this right.
Schrödinger: did you die?
Schrödinger's cat : yes.
Schrödinger's cat : *But I Lived!*
@@luciawilliamson-waggoner3369
. . . .
That's the joke
BUT I SURVIVED
Didn’t think I would see you here, Major
James G Atleast I know where the meme came from
I died and I survived
Teacher: so you understand superposition now?
Me: I'm in a superposition of understanding and not understanding.
HINDOL BHATTACHARYA wow
Ah got to love a video that explains everything and nothing all in one go 😌
that flew over my head ,am watching it again
Schorödinger’s cat went into a bar
And didn’t
I love this!!!
"so were you at the crime scene?"
"i was....... and i wasn't"
It didn’t do either, but did both, until it was observed
After some qubit analysis - a lot of cats went to that bar. Most were banned, some were lost. Others escaped. Many were entrapped by catnip. The few that made it through, became certainly quantum legends.
Sombrero dog your likes have reached 911
no cats were harmed in this experiment - or were they..
They *were* but they also *weren't*
they were and they werent
Hi VSauce, Michael here
"What makes something there, but not there, and simultaneously here, but not here????"
They weren't harmed, they were just killed, duh
Thanks for the video.
The 1st time I heard this theory I didn’t get it so I forgot it. The 2nd time I heard it I completely understood it in a few different ways. It’s Genius.
schrödinger: I got you a gift
me: *sigh* is it another dead cat?
schrödinger: we won’t know until you open it!
ah, classic schrodinger, always being so mischievous
Underrated comment
So it means you can't know state of anything inside a box without opening it first . If that's all then why the headache of understanding the cat can be either dead or alive ......
You’d have to have an Alive cat at some point?!
LOL I'm dead 😂
A student goes to the library an asks the librarian if there are any books on Pavlov's dog or Schrodinger's cat. The librarian says "That rings a bell, but I'm not really sure..."
hmm
A fine joke! 😄
Big Brain time
Okay, that was pretty good.
“Not really sure” = Schrodingers Cat paradox. It the cat alive or dead in the box?
“Rings a bell” = referring to the trained response of Pavlov’s dog salivating at the sound of a bell.
* c’mon, dude.
Nicely explained!
Quite nice explanation!!
‘Is your cat alive?’
Schrödinger: ‘Well yes, but actually no.’
But actually both
yesn't
@@Gozi101 lol
"Is your cat dead or alive?"
Schrödinger: "Yes."
Well no, but actually yes.
is the cat dead or alive?
Shrödinger: yes.
Lol what?
Ah I got the reference, it's hide the pain harold
Yes but actually no
Inclusiveor
We never know or
We could nevee know
Until and unless we make an observation
This is the same as sending a snap to your crush asking if y’all can go out on a date and getting a snap back.. the answer is there but you won’t know until you open it. And in that moment you u feel what Schrödinger felt.
Totally off topic but the lil transistors are SO CUTE. I WANT ONE AS A PET FR. 3:59
When you're sleeping the world doesn't exist until you wake up
or the universe exist because you were born O-O
The best short explanation of quantom mechanics, thanks
The moon doesn't exist until you look at it
@@ditinct8894 how about this one... You only wake up in the morning because you expect too.
@@antiquarian1773 your comment doesn't exist until I look at it
I can't be the only one who understood absolutely nothing
you're not but you are
Yup
It’s a fancy way of saying, “Something is everything until observed”
Feynman: "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics"
You’re not supposed to understand quantum physics
The process brought back my focus, not my lack of feeling
I was very confident that i understood and felt proud till this man brought in wavelength and what not. (note: i am not complaining tho it's just that i will have to rewatch that part and make my brain connect what he is saying and understand)
Schrödinger got pulled over by a cop. The cop look in the trunk and said "do you know there's a dead cat in the back?" "Well now i know, jerk"
+Ayomi Bhumi Schrödinger took his cat to the vet, and the vet told him "Sir, I've got some good news, and some bad news."
Lmao
+Ayomi Bhumi Jerk? You mean da/dt? ;)
lol
+Ayomi Bhumi he got pulled over and didn't!
Well, I’m alive but dead inside
LOL !
😂😅😭
r/iamsoedgy
Ure Schrodinger human
-looks at you-
what a great explanation
“Does a bear fart in the woods?” Is a better allegory
My PhD interviewer: What is schrodinger's cat thought experiment?
Me: To me, I'm both selected and rejected for the admission until you tell
Interviewer:
TIME TO DO THIS
@@aerisdl if they ask, I do think it's the best witty answer.
No. The selection is done only after they make a decision. However, the death of cat already has a chance before the cage is opened
@@vineet3269 of course I meant "after the decision was made"
Boom!! You passed the interview 🙌
“What we know is a drop. What we don’t know is an ocean”
Yesn't
What..wgat about the sea
Dark statement
If you know, you know
One can do whatever he wills
One can't will whatever he wills
This was a nice, clear explanation. Of course, I still don't understand the idea of electrons being shared among atoms, as is claimed in this video. In school, I was taught that electrons spin around the nucleus of atoms. So if they're moving from atom to atom, it sounds like they are not (?).
I am glad I understood this video better than ever after 3years and a physics degree.
There is food in your fridge until you open it. *Boom.*
The Mining Star woah
Instructions unclear,became mariah carey
lol
This is my favorite way to explain it
whats the point im still hungry either way
no one:
Schrödinger: *hehe unboxing time*
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤧
M-m-m-money shot
There is one thing I understood. I am naming my next cat Schrodinger.
Actually in the double slit experiment they recently found that the particle goes through one of the slits but the wave function goes through both then affects the particle on the other side, it also shows that sometimes the particle doesn't go through any slit but the wave it rode on did and still had an affect on the results..... So basically the act of measuring the test is enough to mess w/ the results, I feel like the only way we'll be able to see what's really going on is if we start trying to come up w/ a magnification device that doesn't use electricity because even at that scale, a small amount of energy is tantamount to trying to hear a flea crawl on a guitar string while someone is playing Through the Fire and Flames by Dragonforce on the guitar at the same time. 😂🤣
Feels like u were taking about the cat in the first minute, but then changed subjects, but didn't at the same time...
Gabriel Bondoc in an odd way that makes sense.
Schrodingers subject
You understand it bro
Every time Schrödinger's cat is explained
love your comment
All I understood was the story of the cat put in a box
lol :")
lol same
haha same 😂😂
Same
same here (plus a little more)
The wave nature explanation should have been told after you had given the second case that if one slot is blocked the pattern doesn't appear then you as a conclusion could say so the Patten with 2 slits say that the wave nature is formed and all ...etc etc
“The cat is both alive and dead”
The Cat:meowing and scratching at the box
Schrodinger's cat
Wanted
Dead or alive
That means if he's dead and alive, there's no reward for you :(
@@carlosmspk very sog champ moment :(
Underrated comment
@@carlosmspk you would get double reward and no reward until you turn it in and find out
...saw that on a Tshirt
Video: *ends*
Me: I didn't understand anything but loved the animations
I understood one word: cat
All others:🗿
It made no sense because its wrong. TED-Ed got schrodingers cat completely backwards. Its actually a counter example that shows how quantum mechanics CANNOT be applied to large systems like cats.
Wouldn’t the cat’s own thoughts and movements alter the probability of outcome? For observation to change the outcome, the cat would have to be both motionless and thoughtless (considering all other extraneous variables have been eliminated). Is a motionless, thoughtless object even alive?
is this kinda like
"if a tree falls in a forest with no one around, does it even make a sound?"
When you swim near the shore of the sea of knowledge and then venture to go out a bit deeper ... and drown in it.
+Enigma Yeah, I just got drown.
Now I don't enjoy swimming.
+Enigma Well at least we all die thinking we're smart.
+Enigma It's pretty straight forward.
Are you the center of the Universe or is the Cat?
I don't believe that the cat is irrelevant as Schrodinger does.
Let's say a human straps a cat to a table forcing it to view a box wired with a 50/50 life/death chance.
The human then climbs in the box which can only be opened when the cat meows.
Does the human sit suspended between life/death until the box is opened? Of course not.
The human died or survived the moment the lid closed when they got in.
Eye Heisenberg
I have a simpler explanation, however, I'm not sure if it's right or not.
Again, we have a cat. Now I pull the pin of a grenade, shove it into a specially-made box along with the cat, then shut the trap. This grenade, however, is special because it has 50 percents of exploding, thus killing the cat, and 50 percents of malfunctioning, rendering the cat safe. This box here, is soundproof and is indestructible, so absolutely zero information can pass onto us - the observers. The only way to see the final fate of the cat is to open the box - or measure it. This is where it got interesting in QM. BEFORE you open the box, there's an imperative 50/50 chances the cat is either dead, or alive, so during that time where we know zero information of the cat's fate, we can say that it is, in fact, half dead and half alive.
So to be exact, the cat is in superposition of being both dead and both alive at the same time BEFORE you measure it, or open the box. When you open the box, or measure the cat, the result will collapse back into a single state, making the cat EITHER dead or alive, and not both.
This is a weird way of thinking, because in normal, rational way of thought, the cat is either dead or alive, there's no such thing as being both. Or the grenade either explode, or not and only one single result can be deduce even before measurement.
Matthew Clifford That is the same as Schrodinger's Cat but with a grenade.
The cat is either alive or dead whether we know it or not.
Our ignorance of a fact either way does not make this "cat is in superposition of being both dead and both alive at the same time" caper of Schrodinger true except in his own imagination.
Me: What do you have in that box?
Schrödinger: A cat
Me: Alive or dead?
Schrödinger: Yes
now i'm wondering, who would ask that question?
Person 1: yo i got a cat in a box
Person 2: cool cool, is it alive?
So this is basically "If a tree falls and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"
Kind of creepy that I’d never heard of Schrödinger’s cat until it was mentioned on TV last night - and today it’s on my CZcams front page!!!
0:52 what seems absurd is that the cat has two tails.
Agreed 😹 I guess is was the drawers effort towards an equal fifty-fifty 😹 maths and logic don't always unite 🙈
You made me go back to 0:52 and I laughed out loud.
The fact that it has two tail cuz they are two different cats of two different realities, which in represented as a single merged cat
You’re being transphobic
Actually yes but no
“Famous for something he never actually did”
Christopher Colombias: Hold my Smallpox
I thought it was Christopher Colombus.
I'm still giving this video a like even though I understood nothing.
Well, the cat certainly knows whether it's dead or alive, even if Schrödinger doesn't. And every particle in the universe knows exactly what its doing too, even if we can't describe it. Schrödinger's problem seems more about detection & semantics than it is about some state where things are both A and --A until someone peeks
Before clicking on this video, I had a 50% chance of understanding it, but now when I DID click, I am Brain-Dead.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 true
Welcome to physics
i recommend watching the “quantum mechanics for dummies” video, it really helped me
Richard Feynman :"If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics"
Very VERY true!!!!!
I thought i understood
But now i realise that i don't
.
.
.
Ok so now i truly understand it
Its best to just accept the theory and not think too deeply about it as unfortunate as that sounds. Ill let the theorists keep themselves up at night and spare myself the heartache lol. The theory is very possibly incomplete and I like to believe there are hidden variables that solve these issues.
.. So far no hidden variables have been found for a century!
Yes, but each of those experiments only tests one hidden variable. If you try to prove all hidden variables dont exist by proving case by case, then youll never prove they dont exist because you need to do it an infinite number of times.
Sheldon and Leonard taught me so much!
this just integrated so many of the chapters I learnt in 12th! 🤯
What if you had a camera in the box?
*Physics left the chat*
DoodleDan hahaha. But the reason we can't have a camera is that for something to get into a superposition, it is required that it must not be watched, heard, speculated, or recorded in any way. Otherwise it can't enter a superposition.
The universe has a secret and it wants to keep it
DoodleDan then you have observed it, and by using your curiosity you have either killed or kept the cat alive.
It's not really about observation. It's about interaction with other particles. So Schrödingers cat would never work. It always is in only one position, namely dead or alive.
Kai but schrodingers cat was namely an example of superposition no?
Me: Is the cat alive or dead?
Schrödinger: Yes
*Nice meme*
dead meme makes me want to vomit
Higgs You Make Me Want to Vomit
Higgs Dude stop it, it’s already Cringy
For those already initiated in QM I repeat here some comments previously made to similar videos. They may clarify debatable points.
The Schrödinger time dependent equation (STDE) when applied to a wave representing an initial state of, say, an electron bound to a proton and together forming a hydrogen atom, predicts and retrodicts all the future and previous states of the electron wave, in the same fashion than the evolution equations of classical mechanics predicts the movement of the Earth around the Sun. Note that the STDE is energy conservative, that is, the initial state as well as the predicted and retrodicted ones all have the same energy.
As is well known the bound electron has a completely different conduct. Whatever the initial state and in absence of other interactions an excited electron will settle in a stationary state radiating energy (in the form of a photon) along the way. If the stationary state is the ground state the electron will stay there forever (in absence, as said before, of other interactions). Otherwise the stationary electron state is ephemeral and will be abandoned to radiate a photon and assume a new stationary state of even lower energy. This "down the staircase" process repeats until the ground state is reached. There is no manner to adapt the STDE to this physical process. This inconsistency was discovered by none other than Niels Bohr, as can be inferred from the report of Werner Heisenberg. See our note
www.researchgate.net/publication/356193279_Deconstruction_of_Quantum_Wave_Mechanics
After discovering the tremendous inconsistency between the equation and the atom it would have been natural to announce that the STDE contradicted physical facts, and ask for a correct equation. I assume as true, but only know from hearsay very long ago, that in Einstein's viewpoint the correct deterministic time dependent wave equation had to be non-linear in contrast with the linear STDE. References to this historical detail would be appreciated.
It is hard to believe but, against reasonableness and common sense, Bohr decided to adopt the STDE as correct and that continuity, causality and determinism of physical processes were wrong because they contradicted the STDE. Apparently mathematical equations on paper were more relevant than the experience of the whole human race. Then a series of new and fanciful "quantum physical principles" were adopted.
In my opinion the powerful quantum establishment dogmatically defends Quantism and strongly rejects any attempt to correct its misdeeds, even if the correct deterministic time dependent wave equation is available.
With best regards to all
Daniel Crespin
Box: meows
Schrödinger: i'm gonna pretend I didn't hear that.
I could understand it until he said “superposition”
I could understand it until he said "Australian"
@@firefoxyt6600 i couldnt understand
@@jaycheda3232 you couldn't understand my comment or the video??
@@firefoxyt6600 everything
the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment was devised as a counter-example to illustrate the absurdity of applying quantum mechanics to macroscopic systems.
Imagine in another universe this experiment will be known as cat's schrodinger 😂
Makes sense.
The original postulate should have been, "Put Schrodinger in the box..."
Manfried the Man joined the chat
@@thesoundsmith or "Box Schrödinger in the put..."
Rick and Morty stuff 🤣
Most videos, have not stressed me out , until now
Thanks for explaining Schrodinger's Cat.....it was helpful for me to realize that I don't understand Schrodinger's Cat