SpaceX Escalating Launch Cadence
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 12. 2023
- Falcon 9 is a reusable, two-stage rocket designed and manufactured by SpaceX for the reliable and safe transport of people and payloads into Earth orbit and beyond. Falcon 9 is the world’s first orbital class reusable rocket. Reusability allows SpaceX to refly the most expensive parts of the rocket, which in turn drives down the cost of space access.
Falcon Heavy is composed of three reusable Falcon 9 nine-engine cores whose 27 Merlin engines together generate more than 5 million pounds of thrust at liftoff, equal to approximately eighteen 747 aircraft. As one of the world’s most powerful operational rockets, Falcon Heavy can lift nearly 64 metric tons (141,000 lbs) to orbit.
Merlin is a family of rocket engines developed by SpaceX for use on its Falcon 1, Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles. Merlin engines use a rocket grade kerosene (RP-1) and liquid oxygen as rocket propellants in a gas-generator power cycle. The Merlin engine was originally designed for recovery and reuse.
Royalty Free Music from Tunetank.com
Track: Windwalker by Victor Cooper
tunetank.com/track/3891-windw... - Věda a technologie
SLC-40 is just a godamn MLRS by the end lmao, amazing what kind of cadence landing and reusue lets you achieve. KSC feels like a true spaceport now
Love the detail of the landing boosters
Oh and the Starship tower getting build
i love the single one that landed off in the ocean
Love SLC-40 at the back turning into a literal machine-gun at the end.
Loved the CRS-16 Falcon unexpected water landing!!
Look forward to your video 10 years from now as we look back at all the starship launches.
The video will sound like a machine gun by then.
It must suck to be Blue Origin right next door watching hundreds of rocket launches and still trying to do your first launch 😅
Cool how just one more Falcon Heavy managed to squeeze in there before the end.. XD
Insanity. Pure and simple insanity. And it's driving all other launch providers crazy.
Thanks for putting this together, it's a lot of fun and also very useful. The F9s going up from SLC 40 in 2023 look like a Roman candle going off, lol.
Holy shit the difference between beginning and end is insane. Once we get to 2020 it goes nuts and the end of 2023 is just mind boggling. 😮
Yep, I think they hit 100 launches last year. Just an insane amount that nobody including NASA has ever done in a year.
Great job! As someone who lives on the Space Coast I really appreciate the accuracy and the details. Hope that Elon and the SpaceX team see this. 🚀
Wow.....this....cartoon...duhhh
Great work, as always!
For the next Launch Cadence video that you do it would be nice to include Stats like Total Launches, Launches in that year and Landings.
The lastest Starlink launch was 0-2 days ago.
I absolutely love this animation.
It would be interesting to see a second video centered on SLC4E at Vandenberg
Maybe as an inset, or split screen. The cadence is ramping up there, too. And soon, SLC-6 will join the party!
love how at the end it becomes a steady stream of rockets lifting off
awesome work! Thank you!
Wonderful.
I'd lve to see another version with the drone ship landings shown as well;
When you unlock infinite ammo at your launch site.
3:49, I had the honor of being down at Cape Canaveral to see THAT VERY LAUNCH. Crew Dragon 2 on April 23, 2021.
I have a video of the flight, as if I wasn’t going to let it slip by unrecorded.
Holy cow, that is impressive! So many launches (and successful missions too)
Next I'd like to see east and west coast launches and barge landings. Then you'll have to add Superheavy/Starships!
Just curous, out of those 100 how many were successfull?
@@iandunn8346What are you referring to?
Elon refrenced your video in the Starship Update! Congrats!
There is a mistake here, the first block 5 booster didn’t launch until mid 2018, but the video shows that it replaced full thrust in 2015
SpaceX should seriously consider some kind of "revolver" launch platform! 😂
That was cool. With you having RTLP landings it is a shame you didn't have the drone ships off the coast so we could see all the landings on them too :~)
This is as epic as watching one the Epic Battle Simulator 2 Video's, Great Job
Once again awesome video! 🚀
The crazy part is I watched most of these launches live streams XD
Exceptional idea. Video is amazing as always. I've tried to explain SpaceX's impact on launch services to people. I can show them the Visual Capitalist's infographic to prove the reduction of launch cost but they still don't understand the actual number of launches impact. Now I'll just send them a link to this video.
outstanding work!
SpaceX making spaceflight more airline-like every year.
Leave it to SpaceX to make landing rockets mundane
😅
If starship is successful, it could be come the new airline lol.
@@hamzahkhan8952for intercontinental flights that really doesn't seem unlikely at this point. We'll see on IFT 3 how much faster the fueling process has become with the new subcoolers. If they manage to shorten the process even more then it wouldn't seem totally unreasonable to get on a Starship for a flight from New York to Sidney or whatever and still make it in a fraction of the time a passenger flight would take. Not sure about propellant costs though. If it would be possible to make the ticket price feasible.
@@hamzahkhan8952indeed
Imagine starship Launches without the superheavy
Imagine a launch in time for the previous day breakfast!
@@seantaggart7382i dont think starship will ever launch without superheavy. it might be able to reach space or orbit, but it wouldn't be able to carry any usable payload.
This is awesome! Could you add Vandenberg next time?
You could have included the LC-41 in this video to compare it with the limited number of launches from ULA during that time period.
“When you click a mouse button repeatedly because there is no response and then…..”
Its AMAZING 🎉🥳👨🎓 to witness,what it "WAS"....what it "BECAME" and where its "HEADING"👨🔬🚀🛰🛸👽🦾🦿 The Future Looks AWESOME!!
What a fascinating video. Though shouldn't there be more booster landings? I only ever saw them when the Falcon heavy was launched.
Потрясающе.
And the boost landings on the barge? And the launches from West coast?
Good example of what Starship may become one day.
Amazing vídeo 😍
Epic! 😎
And of course don't forget the starts at Vandenburg!
At the end it goes so fast it becomes one rocket momentarily
Elon Musk himself saw this video. He said about that on SpaceX end of the year presentation !
Can I get a hell yeah!
Would be neat to somehow also show SpaceX launches from other sites. Vandenburg and Starbase.
I have a feeling the starship is gonna be such a game changer they are gonna have trouble finding reasons to launch it. Im hoping a few new companies dedicated to building space stations use the opening in the market to at least have us catch up to the vision of 2001: A Space Odyssey
Thats going green its funny!
Yes
next time add the water landing also
This video makes it look like the Falcon 9s are being repurposed into surface-to-air missiles.
I seen a few in person and watched every one on CZcams and haven’t watched any since they switched to Twitter.
Yeah, I've seen one on video since the jump to Twitter/X. I've seen more from my front yard (in Florida) than I've watched on video since the change.
Imagine this but with the space shuttle. KSC truly would've looked like a spaceport.
The original stated intent of the Shuttle program was 40-60 launches a year. Unfortunately, once Congress got done with the program's design and funding, we ended up with something that never went over 9 in a year (1985), and remained at 7 per year at most post-Challenger with a 4 ship fleet.
@@saundby I've seen it claimed by those who would know that the "40-60 per year number" was a fraud to get Congress to buy in to the related "cost-per launch" number, and the everyone involved knew it was never going to happen that way.
Play this at 2x speed to feel the intensity
Watch out Aliens, here we come. Oh yeah 😀
Park the drone ships off shore and show the landings (good & failed).
Don't doubt that they'll get Starship doing the same in a couple of years
They haven’t had a failure with a booster landing in 2 years. Over 190 consecutive successful landings
weird, this video does not appear on my subscribed page
Cool, but people don't need 5 minutes to get this effect. Maybe make one that is one minute
czcams.com/users/shortsF-XNqIRuPAo
Sept 2016 😲😱
Oh, is THAT ALL?? 😉
need an updated version with 2 barges closer one and distant and 2024 looks smeared somehow
👍🌺💐🚀🚀🚀
Y2K20 bug in the thumbnail
You mean SpaceX didn’t launch 4 rockets in 1910? I mean that was a whole 7 years after the Wright brothers first flight 😂
@@GRosa250 Guess SpaceX always was ahead of its time 😂
I just checked the thumbnail and see he fixed the dates. It was fun while it lasted lol
Just like NASA?
SLC-40 in 2023
Jesus - we get the point. I was hoping for a couple of very distant, very loud launches...
shame they won't reach 100 launches this year
Imagine Hazy doing the same thing for NASA launches... it would be a very boring quiet video.
You’d have to skip 2013-2023
This is beyond impressive, that's why Elon is being attacked so fiercely.
And this is why I laugh at the people talking about how NASA, ESA and blue origin are better than SpaceX and could overtake them in the future. Pure clown town.
CIA bus services
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
#ShitYouCouldntMakeUp
I guess more space debris
Forgot to add one key details
The space x satellite and some other space debris
huh?
all stage 2's into leo de-orbit and those that go to GEO enter graveyard orbits.
also, starlink satelittes de-orbit once they get too old.
pretty much no space debris from F9:
_First stage recovered or expended
-second stage are deorbited
-fairings are reused.
-starlink satellites are deorbited at the end of their.
The long rods that use to hold the starlink satellites to the second stage and were used as a deployment mechanism did turn into space junk for a bit, but spacex have stopped using those and found a way to keep them attached to the second stage.
No debris. All stages are deorbited
@@weekiely1233 starlinks
Sadly most of the launches is now space trash. *cough* Starlink * cough* cheap Chinese parts *cough*
most of starlink satellites are still in orbit and operational
Porpously spreading misinformation
That isn't the point. Cheap chinese parts is why the constellation is so low which requires a ridiculous amount of payload. My friend literally bends metal with this stuff everyday. A much more cost economical orbit would have been geosync placement using better OBS components@@rizizum
@@lextacy2008buddy, i don’t think you understand how telecommunication satellites work. the reason they launch so many starlink satellites has nothing to do with cheap chinese parts. by having the satellites in leo, an array is formed. essentially, these satellites create a net. by having them closer, there is better connectivity. launching to geosynchronous orbit requires a larger rocket and smaller payload. the connectivity would be greatly reduced. the starlink constellation is made in washington. just adding on, bending metal has absolutely nothing to do with satellites.
@@northadvantage Um no thats not how efficiency works. By placing more satellites that creates more hops, and more hops creates more lag. Even though you may lose a few ms in response time by placing in a higher orbit, it pales in comparison to the huge loss people are reporting as the constellation got bigger. Look at the reports , dont take my word for it.
Vanessa$
VividGrey
View
VOLARE'