It happened! SpaceX's NEW Crazy Technology is totally HUMILIATED the whole rocket industry!
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2024
- It happened! SpaceX's NEW Crazy Technology is totally HUMILIATED the whole rocket industry!
===
#alphatech
#spacex
#starship
#elonmusk
#space
#spacexstarship
===
Sources of Videos and Images:
Derekiswise: derekiswise?fbcli...
USLaunchReport: / uslaunchreport
Cosmic Perspective: / @cosmicperspective
Everyday Astronaut: / everydayastronaut
Philip Bottin: / bottinphilip
ErcX Space / ercxspace
iamVisual: / @iamvisualvfx
C-bass Productions: / @cbassproductions
TijnM: / @tijn_m
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
Christian Debney: / @christiandebney1989
Louie: / rizz68921715
zan Ramos: / izanramos2002
StarshipGazer: / starshipgazer
/ starshipgazer
Starbase Surfer : / cnunezimages
LabPadre Space: / labpadre
/ labpadre
WAI: / felixschlang
EARTHICS: / @earthics
Deven Perez: / devenperez
===
It happened! SpaceX's NEW Crazy Technology is totally HUMILIATED the whole rocket industry!
SpaceX continues to set new launch records each year, eclipsing its competitors. However, their dominance isn't just limited to launches. They're also showcasing remarkable speed in engine production and potentially entire rockets in the future.
What's their secret? It's not solely manual labor or a complex system. Their success largely hinges on an incredibly powerful technology they've adeptly utilized for years: 3D printing. In this episode of Alpha Tech, let's delve into the advantages of this technology for SpaceX and explore its boundless potential for the future. - Věda a technologie
The title of this video doesn't read right 😐
Should have used 'has' and 'entire'
Informative ❤️ The title 💩 , so much so I will not be forwarding it.
Not the first time this site has butchered the English language either, though it's usually the narration that's impacted.
It reads left if it doesn’t read right.
It's amazing to me that NASA has taken so long to go back to the Moon. Were it not for SpaceX we would still wondering about going back to the Moon after 50 YEARS. Former President Bush proposed the Moon to Mars program way back in Jan. 2004, and as it was getting started along came President Obama who defunded the program and said, "were not going back to the Moon because 'we have already been there." If Elon Musk was born here, I would vote for him as our next President.
Obama had the Muslim outreach program using NASA funds as well.
Because Presudent Obama WAS a Muslim AND , as it turns out, a homosexual as well. What a combo.
@@vinnylamoureux1187haha
"Big mike"
I wont watch videos that have a title containing "humiliated"
I said the same thing, but am still watching - but really wish @alphatech4966 would stop doing that :/ (and everyone else)
Sounds like Relativity at 88% 3D printed is the one that "HUMILIATED the whole rocket industry"
woww Space X 👽👊🤟🚀🔥💯
It's absolutely amazing what 3D printing can do and what it's future development will do.
Terrible headline. Terrible.
How did a Blue Origin image get in there?
\
You don't need to convince me that a stainless steel rocket with 33 engines is the height of perfection . Objections will not be accepted .😄
They look good, but are they structurally sound? Are you a structural engineer? When you get down to very light gauge material, the questions become about how well it handles stresses. A cylinder is quite strong in vertical loads but as the material gets lighter, horizontal stresses can become more of an issue. For example, you can stand on a pop can if your weight is evenly distributed, but introduce some force from the side and it can easily collapse. Most thrust load is vertical, but that changes when you need to steer the path of the rocket, or during stage separation when stresses can get extreme.
Looking good isn't a good measure of performance, which is more imprtant than looks,
@@professorg8383 At least, it survived stage separation in 2nd flight test. And even a more severe stressful condition in the 1st flight when the whole thing swirled around in one piece after failure of stages separation..
@@tocu9808 Yes they separated, but both were lost. I haven't heard a good explanation for that, If one or both suffered partial collapse, the tanks could have been damaged. Leaking fuel and/or Oxygen would/could cause major pressure drops leading to the engines not firing correctly. Musk seemed to oversimplify what went wrong and like it was a simple mistake! But it seemed to me to be case of downplaying what happened when in reality it was a significant issue,
@@professorg8383 Both failures were apparently not caused by structural collapse of those big stainless steel cylinders. More likely something related to fluid dynamic issues of the rocket's fuel system.
//@@tocu9808 And you got this info from where? I had seen some speculate about the booster being fuel starved. But not using a dummy payload and then dumping the LOX, wth the engine firing, doesn't seem like a "fluid dynamics issue" unless that's code for the engineering team being drunk on Vodka when they made those two mistakes!! As in a fluid that will effect what someone does!! I recently heard that one regarding how Russian air defense crews shot down their own Su34 jet!! Yep, fluid dynamics strikes again!
Excellent stuff bro
Thanks ☺️
It's not the voice, which I believe is human, it's the audio editing of it that's poor regarding pausing.
Who ever writes the scripts for your channel, they deserve a raise! Not joking. every video is so well written.
Thanks for your comment. We'll try harder so keep following our channel ☺️
Maybe they should write the titles too? 🤔
If you hadn't included humiliated in your title this would have been a great video for once.
They should call it printforging
Wonder if they'll 3D print the nose cones...
3D printing, nice for compomants, but too slow for large hulls at this point. Too easy to fabricate using structural materials.
Also theres likely a future division between rockets for exiting Earth's gravity well, and rockets used in space only, or in lesser gravity wells. The engines wont need to be nearly as high performance, and will likely be fabricated using materials mined and processed on planetoids or in orbiting industrial plants.
Until we are attempting higher gravity planets than Earth, We wont need anything actually much better in reaction mass engines. But it would be nice if we could come up with systrms better than chemical reactions and heat engines.
If you can ship 3D printer to moon or mars, you can print rockets and vehicles on site (at moon or mars).
Great idea😂😂😂
@@alphatech4966 If you think about it, how Rome was able to expand...
Imagine 2000 years ago, could Rome even think about shipping horse, live stock & vegetation to Americas in their tiny ships?
But Great Britain was able to ship Steam locomotives, 2000 years later.
Someday…
Make the title fit the subject matfer.
Whoever wrote the title caption, needs to go take a class in remedial English!
*HAS humiliated the *ENTIRE rocket industry! Who writes these idiotic titles? 😂
What technology? You didn't even say. Maybe next time don't create a fluff video about nothing.
Only watched the first 3 seconds, as soon as I hear that monotone computer voice I switch off, please please stop using it.
You totally humiliated English with this video title
3D printing, additive manufacturing…….. YAWN…..
SpaceX, if anything, is playing catch-up here. A total Yawn-burger. Old news.
Catch up what ? Are there currently many firms 3D printing orbital rocket parts ?
@@tocu9808 Yes. There are! Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin, Blue Origin, to name just a few. And so many startup companies are also using additive manufacturing for complex space vehicle parts.
@@wolfman007zz How advanced are they in what specific works in 3D printing components, so that SpaceX has to catch up ?
@@tocu9808 Everything you care to name. Name some components.