WHAT would YOU do? And BLOCKERS! | How to WIN $3,000,000 in 3 Days Part 11
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2024
- Would you rather limp against a sticky big blind player or one who folds a lot? We're in an interesting spot in this one against a killer and we discuss equity denial, blockers and un-blockers.
0:00 Introduction
1:03 What do you think?
1:53 Preflop
3:56 Flop
5:15 Range Analysis
7:15 Check Raise
8:30 Turn
10:49 River
11:50 Awful River Card
13:45 Blockers
14:45 Unblocking example
The 2023 Super High Roller Bowl was a $300,000 Buy-In event featuring all the killers including Jason Koon, Alex Foxen, Justin Bonomo, Stephen Chidwick, LuckyChewy, Michael Addamo, Isaac Haxton, Nick Petrangelo and more! Stay tuned to the channel for more hands from this "How to Win $3,000,000 in 3 days" series, new videos twice a week!
Catch all the Super High Roll Bowl episodes at PokerGO and use promo code DANIEL2023 to get $20 an annual subscription: bit.ly/DANIEL2022
Take the Free Hybrid Poker IQ Test here: iqtest.hybridpoker.com/daniel
Check out my MasterClass: www.masterclass.com/classes/d...
Use PROMO CODE KIDPOKER20 to get 20% off at contendersclothing.com/?rfsn=...
Check out my DAT Poker Podcast at podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... and subscribe on iTunes.
Follow Me, Daniel Negreanu, Online Here:
linktr.ee/dnegspoker
/ realkidpoker
/ dnegspoker
/ dnegspoker - Hry
Please make more videos like this! I've learned more from these videos than any other source
Daniel, you have done so much for the game of Poker! Thank you so much!
Limp against the player who defends. If you raise and they call, you don’t gain information on their range/strength since they have a tendency to call with with a wide range. Bet against the tight player. If they call, you learn they have a stronger range, or if they fold that’s good too
👆📩📩
Obvs the BB is going to call or "defend" if you limp tho. They literally can't fold... What info does that provide? U make no sense.
Thanks Daniel Great content!!! NEED More tourney reviews like that :) ONCE A WEEK SHOULD BE OK
I think blockers are very complicated for most players to fully comprehend. If you don't study and understand hand combos, then blockers sound like mythical things. Probably because when you first try to use the idea, a lot of the time, you get it backwards. It's kinda like trying to explain variance to a nervous player. They would get scared and not want to play at all,. If you are able to understand the game and understand it's all long money, nothing is done to make a quick buck then it's rare to get nervous in a hand, the money doesn't matter and the result doesn't matter, only the play matters. You'll find yourself more concerned with betting 2BB when it should have been 2.3BB. Coming in second will feel like last, because you were so close to the trophy, you just couldn't get a hand that could seal the deal. Your thoughts will go back to 40 hands ago....... would that guy have folded to 8BB? I feel like 6BB was a little too priced in for that guy. The mental game gets more important the deeper down the rabbit hole you go.
As for the original question you would limp against sticky players, and raise the nits who fold to aggression. As always I love the video, Thank you Daniel!
The other tricky thing about blockers is that a lot of the time you are blocking both the most logical bluff and most logical value hand, for example you have top pair with the AdKx on Kd7x4d2x2d, you block about half the logical flush combos but also are they really bluffing without the Ad (assuming they don't really have 7d4x which seems like a great bluff combo if it somehow got to the flop)? Also given you block top boat and nut flush do you use your blockers to turn your hand into a bluff? My thought in this spot is your hand its too good and you block the logical value so you sigh call (most of the time, obviously depends on exact player and actions) but certainly just considering blockers points you in several completely different directions.
you sound like you just learned about it because it's not that hard. Maybe because I have a math and physics degree and know combinatorics.
Daniel, these videos are pure gold!! Thanks a lot for creating this content!
Glad you enjoy them
Love your videos tell Amanda to stop worrying tell us everything
you were the reason I got into poker negreanu 🤙🏽
these videos are so useful for me thank you Daniel !
Idk what a lot of things mean but I still love watching all these vids. I got into poker over the last 2 or so weeks and you’ve been a massive part it in that!
Thank you Daniel !
lol I love how he gives Mike Matusow a kick in the sensitives at 9:36
great content!
I’ve learned more about poker, just to hear your break down of this hand, then i’ve learned reading any poker book.
and its FREE 😀
Very much appreciated you do this. You don’t need to clearly, but you obviously like to give back to the game. I love that you always give your insight in such a clear way and a bit of personality/fun with it.
Wow that just clicked for me. Thank you Daniel you’re the best!!!
Hey Daniel l absolutely love your content! Interesting and helpful for my own game! Im convinced you made me win more Homegames than l wouldve on my own!
Any suggestions for tracking your live poker results close to as well as online play? Want to work with solvers more, but don't have an effective system for keeping track in live tourneys. Would really appreciate your input. Thank you
I love that Kerry still refuses to do stacks of 20 just to annoy these GTO bot players
I like these tournament hand analysis videos. Good job Daniel.
J-4o are the best blockers to have.
👆👆📩📩
He won’t have that in SB. Nor will he have the majority of the 3dXd combos that daniel states here
@@harryroberts2074 missed the joke
Especially if you put them on A high 😂
Well it blocked garret from hustler
Yeah, watched it three times. Thanks, Daniel.
Daniel these videos are great, thank you for making these
People say Moneymaker was great for poker, and I say he was…short term. Long term Daniel has been the best for poker. This stuff is gold!
Yet another really great deep dive, thanks
👆👆📩📩
I like these videos. Learning from the master
thanks daniel. u explain it so everybody can understands it... not only these GTO bots😂❤️
These are great man please keep them coming! What you were saying about blocking and unblocking makes sense 100%. I've been playing poker half of my life and I never had that thought lol. If I am the one holding that missed flush draw, all I think is damn I missed, what size bet can I make to bluff him off this pot.
Right, its something solvers really help you understand. If you are betting the draw and your opponent is calling, then he is less likely to have a draw which means he will often call the river!
@@dnegspokerhe will often call a river, when the river bricks out? Am I getting this right?
15:42 just as I rewinded this part you said to rewind haha
Rewatched the last minute several times. Think I learned something
Never laughed harder, I know you didn't plan to make it funny but it was a good laugh 🤣
Kid Poker...The 🐐
sticky players range is much wider when we attack the blind, so i would like to think our hand is good more often.
plus we play a bigger pot in position, also a plus.
negative is, that sticky players range is harder to read, so we sometimes fall for traps.
plus vs the nittier player is, that we can win the blinds more often without having to continue.
and the range they call us with is smaller, so its a better read on them.
i think i rather limp vs the sticky player and bet vs the nit
Other way around imo.
The sticky will stick even when you raise, so you get to up the pot against them when you have advantage. You’ll have them beat most of the time.
Limping also lets you sucker in nits who normally would have folded and extract more value out of your premium hands against against the nits.
But the way i said increases the variance and makes it harder to play post, because you have no info on the sticky.
And picking up the blinds against nits is always just plus EV since you avoid letting them hit the flop.
In both cases raising is bit ‘better’ which is why in general limping is kinda an exploit.
All depends on what tendency you are trying to exploit I suppose.
If the nit remains tight after flop and won’t get suckered into valueing their hand too much there’s not much value in limping them.
Thank you so much for explaining the blockers and the unblockers. Very interesting !!
👆📩📩
Michael Jordon teaching me how to play defense is not going to lead to me beating MJ 1 on 1 any time soon, but it will get me playing more basketball, which is a good thing for all basketball players everywhere. (To be fair to Amanda, it might help Kobe Bryant beat MJ 1 on 1) I love DNegs acting as the modern Doyle Brunson and help lead people in to the modern poker era the way Doyle helped everyone get the basics of playing poker professionally.
Another 🔥 Vid ! You should start going live more Daniel ! I really enjoy watching your lives . Best on YT !
👆👆📩📩
I would rather limp against the sticky guy because usually the bottom of an opening range gains most EV from stealing the blinds. If that's not the case I still want to see a cheap flop with some playable cards, but paying the minimum...I think. I also wouldn't limp premium hands against that kind of guy (obviously) and my limping range would be very depolarized.
These videos are so good. Daniel is getting really good at making these videos
👆👆📩📩
Yeah its a training for us viewers and for him
Limping is pimping served me well in Vegas last weekend.
My guess is that Badziakouski was going to fire on just about any non-diamond river here.
AhKh or Axh in general could be a hand you call the flop and turn but fold the river.
Would he have called a reraise on the flop with those hands though?
@@incardnito7953 2 overs and a backdoor flush. Probably. Cant just be folding everything to a checkraise. If he's raising A8o preflop he has plenty of complete air he will be folding to the raise already.
trick question! the answer is: it depends!
ideally, you want to limp against both a sticky blind player and one who folds a lot!
because a sticky player will play weak hands when they are invested and a passive player will only play strong hands.
so if you like winning lots of small pots with low risk then you would prefer the passive player. if you like winning the big hands with more risk then you like the sticky player.
i'm guessing what Daniel is trying to say, with the question, is to not be a single type of player. gotta mix it up right?
Hey Daniel, agree or disagree.
There are only two examples of blockers that matters.
An Ace to consider for the nut flush.
A pocket pair in our hands to consider for a four card straight board.
Anything else is such a small percentage that it is more cons than pro's.
I miss you playing live tournaments at 9 pm Romanian hour like you use to do on gg poker. When we will hsve that again?
Great content Daniel. Helping my game get better which I need 🤣👍
👆👆📩📩
Danal Danal (In that voice you do) 🤣
I pick choice number one Danielle
I accidentally deleted your reply
So thinking about the end of this video…if you have a miss draw in certain situations it will be more likely that your opponent has the better hand?
Got up early to watch this. I rewound this video a couple of times. As far as your question my guess is that to limp or not might be dependent on the cards you hold. Thanks Daniel, enjoyed. 😁
👆👆📩📩
That wasn't the question haha
@@dnegspoker 😂 love to hear more about blockers and unblockers.
14:00 I'll go look this up myself, but it's crazy to me that a card you SHOULDN'T have (3d, in this case) would influence any decisions. Shouldn't he only be considering the diamonds that are IN YOUR RANGE? I guess we're saying that 3d5d is actually in your range for flop call, but is it really for turn call?
How did you get your hair back
Probably the sticky big blind, cause I think for the one who folds a lot, if I ever just want to avoid the flop, I might just want to make them fold and have that option available to me
limp against a passive player so we can open agaisnt the sticky player....becasue we don't mind playing the bigger pots in position?
Matusow catching strays 9:35
if river was 7h instead of 7d, then this As8h is better bluff catcher. It blocks heart value combos, and unblocks diamond bluff combos, right?
Daniel why haven't you an indepth super-masterclass? Your masterclass is super good and I'd be happy to give you my dollars for more in-depth thoughts and processes (no worries Amanda).
That's what these videos are.
@@WalterLiddy Thank you but Imeant an actual course, not a collection of videos without an order, or in depth use of ranges, solvers etc. If you have seen th emasterclass, you know that it was much more constructed than these videos.
Isn't Makita a power tool?
I think sticky of course, because against passive player we are going to raise more.
Very well explained - specifically because you have a good sense of what it is that many of us often don't quite get.
Thanks (from Toronto!)
so the obvious answer would probably be to limp against the sticky BB because you can't get him to fold with an open, but what if i can exploit his calling too much by playing bigger pots with more equity against his too wide range? i'm not sure but i might want to limp against the player who folds a lot.
Only problem with that is that fold a lot guy could catch some tricky flops that he would normally fold
@@robertshepard3408 yes i was thinking about that too, but surely the answer isn't "neither"?
What’s the name of the outro song?
I’ll limp call against overly aggressive players to give them the sense of control at first. Great video, I aspire to be as great as you.🔥🔥🔥
Also disguises your hand
limp vs fold or limp vs raise? It's a trick question, so maybe answer both? Sticky players have wider range with a lot more bad hands, tighter players have very strong ranges in the same given position, so i'd guess you'd want to limp more vs fold vs sticky, but limp more vs raise against tight players.
Daniel, i wonder if u have posted or you planning to post a video on how to manage your stack when you are in first 3 players in chips for example, what sort of hands u should play what spots ? Thank you
Thanks for this videos dnegs. Greetings from Argentina.
We want to see Amanda on camera so we can see her grimacing and rolling her eyes and kicking you under the table when you are about to expose your secrets lol.
limp against the over defender
You limp the Battler ,Y?cuz he will be more inclined to reraise. by limping we limit the pot and our risk, subsequently the BB will have less to steal preflop, If he does raise, it will be relatively small and we can see the flop. You also wanna limp your Value hands against the nit, Y? So we can get him post flop , out of position, and against a stronger range + -Jett Cramer -AKQ
he reraised it to 75k on the flop for information, its 75k to call 300k , is he pricing out the two flush draws? No, he is trying to get to the river cheaply and apply aggression at low cost
I'm trying to figure out he got the number of two card flush combos at 45 ? How can there not be a ton more? Where is my math wrong thanks guys
the crazy thing solvers taught us is when someone barrels the river when the flush draw bricks its actually better to have those blockers to the flush because good players know solver hates bluffing with miss flush draws. Crazy world we live in.
Great analysis, Daniel! To your question, maybe if you had JJ/TT/99 (no diamond), you might've called flop/turn and folded to a big river bet?
👍
D negs, please consider going to congress, as our ambassador, to get online poker legal again. You're the most visible and famous poker player in the country, and being well spoken and likable, I can't think of anyone better for the task. Online sports betting is legal, which makes it easier to get poker legal again. I get the reasons against it; corruption on Full Tilt made it so, but there's got to be a way. I know you don't even think about it, because it's legal in Vegas, but that's not us. Thanks.
👆👆📩📩
It is a states rights issue at this point.
2 months 2 million?
3 million 3 Days 😎
Lol oh Amanda. Let the man speak. I’m never going to play against him. How will I know if I was right with the question
I am going with the player who fold a lot 😂😂
Is it fair that you know what everyone has in the hands? I think not!!
Something worth pointing out that you almost mentioned (and I think you were going to but got sidetracked) - if he does attempt to bluff the river, it can't be a small amount (which you did say), like 1/3rd pot. So if he's going to bluff then it needs to be much higher (75-90%?), say 300k+. His stack at that point is still 691k. If he commits 300k+ and loses, he's down to 4th out of 5 in chips on the table. And what does he do if you shove over the top of his bluff (clearly he folds), but he's devastated his strong position in the tourney with a risky bluff that's likely to be called given the action that happened prior.
Limp vs sticky dude
👆👆📩📩
For me 33 Is a hard flop fold, but i do
If he goes all in do you call ?
I’m always willing to take the BBS pot if he has a habit of giving it up.
Definitely against a defender in my opinion.
Limp against sticky. If they fold a lot just pick up the blinds. I think
👆👆📩📩
I don’t know the answer, but wouldn’t you want to raise more against sticky since they’ll be OOP with worse ranges and more chips in the middle?
@@yiannimitropoulos3913 - thanks, really thoughtful response and very much in line with what I was thinking
@@yiannimitropoulos3913 @davin510 I appreciate both of yall responding to my comment. I was thinking of it the other way around but can definitely see trying to get it in pre with the better hand against the player who is sticky. I still wonder if limping into the bb who over folds is the best long term. I guess there is a lot more value getting the sticky bb to pay off vs just taking the one bb from the over folder.
Correct! If players over fold in the BB you want to just pick up the dead money with marginal hands like QT for example. Against a tough sticky player who fights for pots, you can force them into passivity by limping, especially if the SB also completes. The more players in a hand, the less one should be bluffing.
Limp against the defender and raise against the passive
Smart cookie
Limp against aggressive players
"very linear range"? You mean limited?
Limp against the fighter
👆📩📩
Thank you for the advice to go win 11 million in 3 days. Tomorrow I’m taking out my life savings to have 1 single shot at this! Wish me luck
I would rather not limp against an aggressive blind defender... put pressure on with a good hand.
I got 55
the unblocking part in the end was very good indeed, would love to hear more about that from you, was actually just asking myself some questions in that regard earlier in the video
Hi
Limp against sticky raise against the one who folds of course. Nice beard Daniel
👆👆📩📩
I wish to sit at a table with you one day and bite you. To show what a good teacher you are because I learned most of the tactics from watching your games.
obviously we are limping against sticky BB's
You limp against a guy who defends right? Because you should raise those hands against someone who cant defend. Is that right?
Against a passive player, you just open and take their blinds most of the time. I would rather limp against a sticky player. That way, I keep the pot small. When you know you are better than your opponents post flop this strategy is gold. Limps in general, favors the experienced players.
Limp against someone who defends more. Big Blind calling tells less against this person
Can someone explain me what he meant at 15:00 about unblocking?
Unblocking just means not blocking. So if a flush draw fails (say 2 hearts on the turn and no hearts after) you don’t want to have any hearts because it increases the chances that your opponent has 2 hearts and was hoping for the flush.
@@quinnreilly7681 so isn't this the point? Better to block the flush draw with your suit that missed rather than have none at all?
@@FREAKIE90 in this case he is saying flush being missed you dont want to have 2 hearts in your hand,cause that means less chances your opponent will have also 2 hearts there,so for sure he called you with some good equity and value into his hand that will win the pot...but if you have a small pair for example with no hearts lets say,than your opponent might have many of those hearts still available so the chances to call you with a flush draw are higher so in this case you have more chances to win the pot...so overall you dont want to block the flush posibilities in this particular case...i hope i made myself understandable,my english is not the best for sure
@@FREAKIE90 It depends on what you want your opponent to have. If a flush beats you, then you’d want to have some of the flush cards to help block ones he could have. But if you beat a flush, then you’re hoping he has a flush so you can crush him. So then you wouldn’t want any of the flush suit in your hand.
In this case the flush missed so you would NOT want any flush cards, thereby making it more likely your opponent has them and missed.
I'd rather limp against a big blind fighter. They won't feel the need to raise a lot of time. If I raise, they are going to call or 3-Bet a good bit of the time. I will also keep a big blind passive player on the hook if I limp with a descent hand.
👆📩📩