Harvey Specter Faces His Mentor | Suits
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 12. 2019
- Harvey goes to Cameron Dennis' house and pushes him to make a deal to step down, so the trial doesn't push through and the men he put in jail will stay in jail.
Stream full seasons on Peacock: pck.tv/46kqJxO
Season 1, Episode 11 "Rules of the Game": Harvey's former mentor wants help when his office is investigated. Mike and Louis try to settle a mogul's estate.
Your favorite shows, movies and more are here. Stream now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com
This is the official CZcams channel for Suits: home to all the swagger, smarts and sexiness from Pearson Hardman - one of the top New York law firms that hire solely from Harvard law. Well, almost entirely.
Subscribe for more Suits: bit.ly/2maVymH
Buy Suits Complete Series DVD Now: bit.ly/2paFnay
#SuitsOfficial #Suits #HarveySpecter #GabrielMacht #CameronDennis #GaryCole #Fights #LegalDrama #Lawyers #Peacocktv - Zábava
So strange seeing him without his mustache
Watch one hour photo, then…
Dennis,Tanner & Forstmann were something else bruhh.
Yeah
Nobody compares to Forstmann
Hardman as well
Andrew malik and anita gibbs as well
Hardman is the goat
Harvey walked away from the DA’s office when he realized Cameron was corrupt, even if it was for the right reasons.
He ended up sending innocent people to jail. That's not for the right reasons.
@@thechosenone1533 After Harvey found out he got Clifford out
@@abdullahal-zadjali3237 I was talking about Cameron,not Harvey.
@@thechosenone1533 ok
Cameron isn't corrupt. He may be a sucker for rising in the ranks though.
Harvey wanted more. He wanted "the chase". Like stockbrokers. The tiny surge of adrenaline that rushes when he castigates Tony Giannoupoulis or Neil Stillman.
Cameron was a cocky character. No wonder Harvey called him his first mentor...
Actually Cameron's Cockyness is probably a trait Harvey took on in the series.
Cameron wasn’t exactly bad, but he had good intention
It's a moral debate, is it right to break the rules to defeat evil people? Some say yes, some say no. But if the Justice System lets Prosecutors who break the law get away with it, someday one of them will break the rules to convict an innocent person.
@@VDA19
Truth
@@VDA19 basically under Cameron lets say he tried 100 Awful people,
using his tactics lets say 90 are Guilty and go to prison (and could have otherwise walked and seriously hurt someone else)
10 are Innocent and are wrongfully imprisoned
is it worth it?
truth is until either you or someone you know is wrongfully convicted a lot of people would say it was, its a gray area none the less
@@FalconFlyer75 Of course it's not worth it. Better for 99 criminals to walk free than 100 people to go in jail with 1 being innocent.
Harvey was the disappointment. Yapping about what Cameron did when he went on to hire a fraud.
You help rich people keep their money that's all you do. I stack my value to society against yours and I win by a mile. Sad but True
Not true at all
It’s definitely true.
@@AdjustingMindGames username checks out
@@ghungrooseth1946 🤣
That's only if he was right 100% of the time, which he wasn't. Hector was an innocent man, but Cameron buried evidence and got him convicted. Even the most benign authoritarians have flaws.
Soooooo Harvey. You got that TPS report?
ASAP!
Yeah, I'm going to need you to come in on Saturday, 'mkay?
Glad his mentor is Ricky Bobby's dad. If you aren't first, you're last!
@Suits International why are you using just 1st season only
I love Cameron character
In the end, Harvey followed his morals.
He resigned to follow Mike right? To protect the little people. People who are innocent but have no money.
Same with Cameron who would do anything to protect the innocent. Corrupt is when you protect the bad.
I do not believe in "The end does not justify the means". You can rig the game if who you are protecting is innocent. Cameron was not "Corrupt". He was a DA who would do whatever it takes.
Thing is that how does one measure or define innocent and guilty? According to the law? The same law one breaks to protect it? Intent is bound to interpretation just as much as the law is.
@@rinorkoca7270 Perspective, Man. IMO, the rich break the law anyway. That is the truth. This way, the playing field is more equitable.
Is your argument accurate? Of course. But arguments do not break the wheel when rich always get away with it. The law we are trying to protect is the same law Jamie Dimon and others abused to get away with having billions of USA tax Dollars for their bonuses. It is the same law ensuring the money of Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates today.
From where I am standing, I'd rather have the unsung people get the better end of the stick than these Billionaires.
He withheld evidence and put an innocent man in prison. That is as corrupt as it gets.
@@xaviervega468 like what I said, I do not believe in the end does not justify the means. Your argument lies along that principle.
@@KneeJerkReactor But if the end is innocent people being put in jail and being denied a fair trial then there's no justification for that.
Gary Cole, ladies and gentlemen.
I kinda like cameron
where was this filmed? I know this is in Toronto
Season???
Harvey Birdman ???!!
If you ain't 1st you're last.....
Uhhhm yeaahhh Harvey if you could just back away from the case that’d be grreeeaaatr mkayy
This isnt office space lmao
Hahaha YESSSSSS!!
I don't think Harvey got the memo.
Andrew klein.
He's still a crooked lawyer his mentor that is and burying evidence when a person is innocent isn't right either.