Who Are The Aryans According to Rig Veda? | The Battle of Ten Kings | Arya and Dasa
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 02. 2023
- Hi all!
Link to check out my book:
Direct Buy: evincepub.com/product/life-in...
Amazon: www.amazon.in/dp/9356730172?ref
Video about Indo-Aryan Migration theory popularly known as the Aryan Invasion Theory: • Did the Aryans Begin t...
Eminent historians claim that the Indo Aryan people from Central Asia compiled the Rig Veda and started the Vedic Period in India. This happened after the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization.
Aryan invasion theory is also attributed to the Arya and Dasa debate which is seen as the basis for caste system in Hinduism.
Battle of ten kings in Rig Veda says that the Bharata tribes with the Puru tribes started the Kuru Kingdom in the early Vedic Period. What is the importance of story of battle of ten kings in the origin of Vedic Period?
Did the Indo Aryan tribe begin the Vedic period in the Indian subcontinent?
What does the genetic studies say about Indo Aryan ancestry?
Watch the whole video to know more!
Don't forget to subscribe!
Have a great time!
Links:
Facebook: / vijayvidhu94
Instagram: / illoomes_
Funny thing is that 🤣 actuall mythology is "Aryan invasion theory " ...without much evidence we believe on it
Entire india shows proof of every character in ramayana and mahabharath and we call them as mythology 😁😁
Mythology seems like myth but go anf check correct meaning of mythology , the word has myth but real meaning is different so hinduism including all religions are mythology
aryan "invasion" is a myth but that doesn't mean that aryan "migration" is a myth too. THere are archeological and literary evidences that suggest that there was a gap of about 300-400 years between the decline of Harappan civilization and the immigrations of the vedic tribes in north west india
@@ArghyadipGhoshArcheological & Literal Evidences? Please cite them sir. It’s a hoax hypothesis running a political narrative to suit different agendas
@@ArghyadipGhosh😮lol shut up bro we have proofs of various indian epics
@@ArghyadipGhosh Agreed. Calling it an "invasion" is quite the assumption, and quite the unappetizing one at that.
Our ancestors called it Aryavart but Aryan migrated from central asia bla bla bla. Okay🤣
Leftist historians☕
Ok dumbo
Funny thing is that 🤣 actuall mythology is "Aryan invasion theory " ...without much evidence we believe on it
Entire india shows proof of every character in ramayana and mahabharath and we call them as mythology 😁😁
Aryans were not central asians they were from steppes of ukraine ,it is saying like british were fish because they entered india from sea.
U t illitrate
@@sahilsingh6048 but David Reich said yamnaya themselves were 2ndry people of proto indo European , it was his Theory of steppe origin of PTE but now he has new Theory of Anatolian and greater Iran origin of proto indo European ( including part of indus and Afghanistan)
Dr Ambedkar discarded Aryan theory as Vedas has no foreign memory at all
@@fieldspring5329 lol you fail to include the verses where his skin nose and jaw are also described as golden because that doesn't fit your narrative. He's also described as brown in other verses.
yes ambedkar ji did pretty nice research with accuracy
They killed horses to worship their gods, who were eerily similar to Iranic and other Indo-European gods. Sounds pretty foreign to me.
@@foodovisionit's called ashwmegh yagna but foreigners don't worship nature's and cow in Vedas cow is considered sacred
This is possibly more important history than the mughal invsaion chapters in school
This IS more important history, brother.
this made a core component of what indians are culturally and racially today
Acc. to the AMT the aryans came to India, started speaking Sanskrit, started compiling texts and began to rule everywhere, but they didn't mention anything about their homeland from where they have arrived, they called Saraswati river the biggest river, which in fact was completely dried up 6000 years ago, and the theory suggests of Aryans coming to India somewhere around 3500 years ago, so why did they mentioned things which they didn't even witness and didn't mention things which were very crucial for them? obviously because they wanted the future humans to debate over this and for us to use these facts to say that look Vedic culture originated from India only, they were soooo smart. /s
😆😆😂😂 Right! If you are going to make up this "Aryan migration" story, at least make sure that the details don't contradict each other!
@@hkumar7340 aryan invasion has already been debunked but migration is the most supported while there is not a single proof that aryans were natives from india , it is so stupid that people still believe this theory that aryans were original indians such a stupidity.
@@sahilsingh6048 source?
@@sahilsingh6048 bro are you on the 'we wuzz indo-scythian juttttt syndrome drugs' ?
@@Samratfromnorth he is stupid,, we are all austroloid, look how Hritik Roshan looks same as Johnny lever, we are all same, Aryans were indians saar...
Veda clearly mentioned Swaraswati river when it was in her full flow. It seems first Rigveda time is more than 15thousand years ago minimum.
yo gotta be kidding me dude. Give the archaeological evidence, evidence of people's dna and also carbon dating of the site and people. pls
@@rachitborkar8393 why are you disable your brain to research
Saraswathy river is originally Harakswathy river near haiti river of northern side of iran only, no connection with indian culture.
No it was during dinosaurs era. Trex spoke sanskrit.
@@mogambo4565 exactly 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
After many many thousands of years we still differentiate Indians as Aaryan, Dravidian, castes, religion. Some one landed here first and then many more followed until yester years. Can we 100% wowch purity and originality after hordes of invasion and mix happened. Can we segregate pick Ganges water in the midst of any Ocean/River. Let us jointly take our country forward without heeding to any of these things. Now, like we cannot segregate ganga, Krishna, kaveri from Indian Ocean. Mike Indian Ocean it is Srif India.
Wow...❤ what a fantastic thought....
I dont and I am half India. I even have some European blood the people self hating Indians worship. Be a fighter not a licker.
Right bro. Present is important
the avestas of persia clearly talk about the indo european migrations in talk of an aryan homelas called Airyana Vaeja and a similar thing is mentioned in the vedas as Arya Varta. indo aryan literature clearly shows an indo european history you cant deny it
Where's the contemporary progression, evolution and tangible reflection of that Airyana Vaeja culture in Persia ? Are there any artifacts or evidentiary expressions that support your assertion of their primacy in the Aaryan culture ? I am asking in good faith .
@@tibupanda3648 the tangible reflection is there clear evidence of the steppe culture where they came from
@@blockmanhatecommentguy6280the 3500 yr old horse chariot found in sinhauli says otherwise foh
@@Aightbet-ng2si the idea that someone might have in early years ventured down to India or that the info Europeans weren’t the first people to have horses doesn’t throw a rench in history
@@blockmanhatecommentguy6280 it does the basis of the theory is chariots and horses
If you believe that all so called upper caste Hindus are outsiders and you are a descendant of Indus valley civilization then you should also know that the people of Indus valley civilization came from Iran. They created their civilization here by killing ingenious tribes of India. The indigenous tribes of India are also outsiders if you will go further back in the history. They are called the first Indians. They came here from Australia and Africa and started living here by killing a lot of wildlife and indigenous animals. In some way everyone living in any part of the world is an outsider according to this definition. This is how humankind has evolved and migrated everyone. The only people who can call themselves truly indigenous are the people living in the Horn of Africa because first humans evolved there. The word outsider is defined according to our present borders but obviously there was no such borders in the past.
What a stupid none said that upper caste hindus are outsiders ,they are just closely related to aryans then other indian groups, you are just going round and round just say clearly that you believe out of india theory.
india as a nation never existed
call a Russian say him/her that he/she came from horn of Africa then see their reaction
@@171_indranildutta6India as Subcontinent exist OK
@171_indranildutta6 india as a nation existed you rascal
As academic historian how does one forecaste caste system into the future given the knowledge accumulated on ancient history. Does one advocate intermingling of races, tribes, castes, religions etc?
No, this is really just speculation. In fact the original caste (varna/jati) system was a lot more fluid, in it's current form it's a caste system with British notions a class system layered on top.
@@foodovisiontrue
Cool Explanation!
Strangely Central Asia doesn't come up with concrete evidence of a former Vedic civilization. Surely it would be present in a more tangible religious , cultural, linguistic , customary and Architectural expression if this region was the motherland of the vedic civilization. Moreover this region lacks contemporary expressions of a Vedic civilization whereas Indias vedic past is strikingly mirrored in its present. So where's is the historical continuum of the Vedic civilization in Central Asia or Europe? Whereas India's present has evolved strongly with widespread expressions of its Vedic past.
The thing is the aryans became civilized after coming into contact with and mixing with the indigenous indus valley people.
The aryans were steppe nomads like the mongols that lived in felt tents and moved from place to place before finally settling in the IVC.
So no, there is no such thing as “vedic civilization” in central asia. I guess the closest thing would be the bmac culture, but they werent vedic aryans to begin with.
What about Pakistan.....it doesn't mirror any of its Vedic, Hindu...IVC past?? But we know they were IVC culture and Hindus....things change....people change.
Vedic people were not anything special. They were nowhere near india when city states were built in harappa. They get so much importance due to them being an outside migration and they were exotic from local population. Common parallel is white worshiping present in modern indians or to larger extent in Asia overall. A poor white man will get best looking white girl or a white girl getting a high earning man just because it gives evolutionary advantage to the girl to get those white genes for her off spring as it will put them higher in hierarchy. The reason why indians or asians want white skin is not cuz britishers were educated or technological advanced its just about looking good😅 white people know how advantageous their skin is and how much they can mentally influence people. Same thing happened in india 4000 years ago these fair skinned tribes came into india and everyone started worshipping them just like whites are worshipped now and they started emulating their culture. Obviously they thought local people were inferior as they mentioned in their vedas but they themselves were just cow herders and probably traded agriculture crops which were new to subcontinent. Humans are very easy to manipulate with sex and beauty.
@@anika_h After centuries of conquest Afg
@@anika_h A case in point is Afghanistan. After centuries of conquest, socio-cultural transformation and recent wars the country nevertheless still yields tangible remnants and artifacts from a Bhudist past. Surely if Europe was the motherland of the Indic civilization it should yield tangible archeological evidence that demonstrates a civilizational continuum . Change is our challenge. Let us not use it as a tool with dismissive intent. Recent South Indian "finds" challenge the synchronicity of the time-line of the euro-centricity of skewed narratives.
I just want to say even today we have 2 movements ( tukde tukde ) gang and pro bharat pro India people. ( dasas vs. aryas )
Could it be that translating dasas as slaves is wrong? I submit that it is. In our lineage, a dasa is someone fully devoted to someone else. Uddhav and Gopalas are dasas of Shri Krishna.
@@AnilKSingh-mp7hh we are dasas to god🙏
Pro bharat means dividing ppl in the name of caste religion? Or killing our mothers and sisters in dowry harassment, domestic voilence or naked parades?
Tukde tukde is you as ur brain is made in to pieces of caste hypocrisy, religious chavenism, hate towards fellow human and disgust towards nari samman.
@@AnilKSingh-mp7hhyes dasa doesn't mean slave for more understanding read the book Sanskrit Non-translatables
@@AnilKSingh-mp7hhIt was again a derogatory term given by bri'ish people mainly Britanicca. What you expect 😊
You have an amazing channel!
One way of settling the issue is to record past life transcripts of people who regress to ancient times.
The IVC had ended relocated east and south in 1900bc .
The male biased Steppe invaders of 1500 bc had completely merged with the native AASI to create the ANI population of north india, a freely mixing 'caste no bar' population.
INDUS VALLEY PEOPLE NEVER USED SANSKRIT LANGUAGE.
So, what forms of language they had ?
Different kind of script or what ?
Nor did they use dravidian language
@@rameshraju4784 But they had something in Common in Tamil and Indus valley Script.
@@shaheercp389 script of tamil and sanskrit the granta script is very similar so how can we say that script determines language
@@rameshraju4784 I was emphasising that it was not the Vedic people who established the Indus Valley Civilisation.
All concept are imaginary. Following questions can't be taken into consideration during discussion
1. regarding language .. if veda from central asia it should be written right to left as turkish languages if not central asia historian should conform other than india have no proper linguistic in cental asia.
2. Veda may have some perisian/ trukish/ central asian words. Those words may be take from existing indian culture to perisia like thailand, combodia etc..
3. No statue or evidence has found in central asia belongs to Veda or hinduism
4. Sanskrit are similar to or copy of south indian alphabet not like central asia language.
5. basic culture of indians are identical
6. why historians not consider, other than the words similar to central asia in sanskrit are belongs to or taken from aboriginal of Indian.
7.why historians didn't consider, as .migrant from the central asia follow and adopt indian culture ..
8. History makers always consider northern portion of india only
9. History tellers not consider... sanskrit is not spoken language it is created language for temple procedure 7:43
Very good and informative video.
She is reading from Wikipedia... if she making video on rig veda she has to take text from rig veda not from Wikipedia. If she taking about the important book she has to be historian .....
Actually she knows nothing about rig veda 😅
I really liked this video
Repeatedly Attributing to Hindu Civilization... every other minute ... had been the most misperceived notion.
Hindu is a Indian Civil Laws to protect all the Indian school of practices/believes/philosophies that attributes to Indian continent.
Sanatan dhormo or Hinduism is dealing religious matters from so many years ago but missing the chronological information. That's the problem. There are lot of questionable things.
But there are not enough answers. Some said that may be many informative books, documents etc were lost/destroyed in Nalanda university library which was burned by foreign invaders in 1204 a.d.
That was unfortunate.
If DASAS really means "Babaric /Ruthless enemies" who after defeated, would certainly become "Servants" to the conqueror.. were they former (another) Iranian lesser tribes, who knows.? But the word "babaric" implied "uncivilised" or could be "Forest People" who made a living mainly in the woodland and never knew of bronze, mansion/palace.
not a very good video because it lacks detailed citation and analysis. Rig vedic hymns were added in phases. The battle of ten kings wasn't composed immediately after the war but at least 100-200 years later, if the astro-geological evidence is corroborated. That means it is not surprising that the vedas do not mention explicitly any migration which by then was already buried deep in the past. The earliest layers of Rig Veda were a very small collection of hymns that was expanded by the political elite of the Kuru-Panchala region much later. Those earliest parts, through linguistic analysis, are conjectured to have been composed near the Oxus Valley (or BMAC) where many non indo-european (or non indo Iranian) words were added to the indo aryan lexicon, including the word Indra, that helped vedic sanskrit to separate from proto-avestan.
Good to see we're on the same page 👍. This is what I've been saying as well. There isn't any written text by the Vedic people regarding a recollection of a migration, since by their time, their Indo-Iranian ancestors would just be a people of a bygone era, as there's at least a 500 years gap between their presence in the Oxus and the first migrations into the Subcontinent.
Sanskrit older than Avestan. Stop this embarrassing Indian grovelling to fairer skinned Iranians. Its shameful and wrong.
but in fact the vedas DO mention and aryan homeland as do the avestas under Airyana Vaeja and Arya Varta respectfully
Please tell me how Sanskrit appeared in India. It is an Indo-European language which is related to all European languages. Did the ancestors of the Europeans come from India?
I have formally studied Sanskrit and did fair bit of research into western theories. Most of what is written about europians brought in Sanskrit is bullshi*. It just like British claiming to have brought in education civility into India.
No. By all reasonable accounts the Indo-Europeans were steppe peoples who spread out in all directions. 4000 years is a long time for things to diverge, but it's still quite possible and reasonable to reconstruct the relationships between the daughter languages.
Is there any proof that Mahabharatam book was compiled during third century BC?
The name gandhara was givebn by kanishka to the place ,.
That is a proof for M B to be made during or after third century B C . !
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Are you saying Mahabharata happened after Alexander invaded India?
@@madan469 Mahabharatha did not actually happen.
I am saying that it was composed after alexander !
@@madan469Mahabharat ramayan types of things is mythology bruh..u can even imagine if Islam came from Hinduism then why they ppls didnt say Sanatan word
Imaginary stories compiled skilfully. Refer to Nehru book and other true historians.
All the best
Why do ppl, do videos like this without citing their sources?
The most profound plausibilty of the out of India migration is that of the recent Roma migrations into Europe. It proves it beyond doubt . The Roma migration is evidence enough that mass migrations did in fact take place directly from India to Europe during different time periods.
That's stupid. You really think that means the Proto-Indo-Europeans were Romanis? Lol
@@Anglisc1682Not Romanians, Have you heard of the Romanis?
no way he actually thinks the indo european culture CAME FROM INDIA
Iranian or Persian Avesta mentions Indra and Varuna moved to east to Indus Valley region
If you read the work of Dionysiaca. You will know the real reason, though there are embellishment to the story. The real reason, however was to root out Kamdev from the land of Bharat. It has nothing to do with whether the people of India dont want to worship Indra/Zues/Mizraim or not.
What happened to Agni and Vayu?
Where ,? persian Avesta mentioned aryanam veijah as were hetumand is central ( Helmand) and they did not described hapt hendu ( sapt sindhu) are foreign land 😂 but one of region of Aryans
Indra is god
THANK YOU
Please google ,'caste no bar' article by anupriya and population geneticist
Vageesh nsrasinhan.
The forced implementation of Endogamy/Varna/jati system in 100AD confirms the invasion/presence/arrival of the Vedic Aryans(culture) in 100AD on rhe indo gangetic plains inhabited hy the ANI population until 100AD when forcibly imposed social restrictions compelled the freely mixibg 'caste no bar' ANI to regress into their own respective occupation abd conmunity. The beginning of the caste system.
Sound is not the beste. Ure voice is heavy to follow
How much have you studied this very complex subject. It requires a lot of scholarship definitely not the shashi tharoor/ Komila Thapar type
Ved is not 1500 BC old . Ved is atleast 10,000 year old practiced in eastern Europe . At that time no Indus valley civilization even existed . Vedic civilization is older than the so called Indus valley civilization . There is no Indus valley civilization. Vedic civilization is actually Indus valley civilization. The Vedic people starred Indus valley civilization. Vedic people didn't destroyed Indus valley civilization they built it from the ground. The Vedic civilization was attacked by the aryans whose actual name is yamnaya people who came to India around 4000 years ago ( steppe pastoralist) killed cows and ate beef and attacked native people. Vedic people were always ahinsak( non violent ) and never sacrificed animal. if someone wants to follow Vedic Dharma they should follow the practice of Arya samaj. They are following the true Vedic Dharma. The followers of true Sanatan Dharma should perform fire rituals and refrain from Idol worship.
Ramayana period appears to be older than Rig Veda period. Does this mean no vedas existed during Ramayana time?
ramayan period is 1 crore years back
jains also mention ram who later became jain monk after coning back to ayodhya
then krishna period which is 5000 to 6000 years old
vedas are older than ramayan
also these dates are putup by western historians they doesnt want to believe that humans in east were civilized before westerners and yahudis.
What is said below may well surprise the scholars who give opposing views - first, that the Aryans (and their belief systems) were rooted in Bharat and the other saying that it was rooted in other parts of world.
Based on a very ancient text called Yoga-vasishtha, the term 'Arya' relates to the commitment of a person who develops spiritual aspiration to have communion with the almighty Brahm, the ultimate reality. Such a person is termed a yogi - who is referred in the text as an Arya ho has studied scriptures, thereafter also made efforts to connect with spiritually elevated, self realised ones (Satsanga) and has finally decided to follow their path. This is the beginning of a long, even life-after-life trek that finally leads one to realisation of Brahm, and audience with God in so called
Turyateeta state of consciousness of the aspirant yogi. It is like climbing up a seven stepped spiritual ladder leading to God. The term Arya applies to one who has climbed up to the third step; and when yogi climbs to seventh step the yogi has realised God.
This has been explicitly stated in an exhaustive
discourse given by the revered sage Vasishtha to none less than Shri Rama.It took place towards the end of Treta-yuga and has 'spiritual' connotations. The term Arya has nothing to do with ethnicity, race, colour of the skin, etc. if anyone wants exact textual reference, it will be provided.
yeah but in persia aryan means a race
Even rakhigarhi female has 87 percent dna of Iranian origin... No doubt 10000 to 12000 years ago people came from Russia in India and iran
Please tell with evidences !
This research is not required. Only Aryans knows, who are they. 😊😊. You can't find them. But they are there still. Mathas have this information. Which you will never get. So assumptions are assumptions only.. And everything here is us assumptions Only. Because real Aryan informations available in few places only.
In my view aryans also indians after indus civilization some of indians west, remaining people come down to south, west traveld people come to there home land after 1000years , we will called that people aryans but truth was they also indians
Nothing new. This happens for all research/presentations when one is not UpToDate with the new findings and relies on older and obsolete material.
1. Rig Veda was not composed in a single sitting. There were periodical additions. There are 10 mandalas (sections). Each verse is attributed a rishi who composed the verse. All rishis mentioned in Rig Veda did not live concurrently.
2. There were no or scant additions to it in the post Mahabharata war period. As per modern astronomy the Mahabharata war happened c. 4,600 BCE. This date puts all the 'theories' like AIT and AMT or Kurgan Hypothesis into dustbin. It also puts to rest many theories put forward by the so called RW Historians to counter AIT/AMT. Only theory that subsists is OIT.
3. Modern astronomy also dates the Valmiki Ramayana to 12000 BCE.
4. Recent publications (last decade or so) by Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow [Dr. Niraj Rai] suggest that statistically, there is no difference between DNA of north and south Indians.
There are definite indications that Bharata Varsha landmass was inhabited by intelligent humans for the last ~60,000 to 80,000 years.
Meluhha was the name used by the Sumerians for the people of the Indus Valley civilization. The Meluhha is the origin of the Sanskrit Mleccha, meaning "barbarian, foreigner". Vedic Aryans encountered the Meluhha living in the Indus Valley and used their their name as a derogatory term for all non-Vedic people. People/tribes adopt the culture/history of their neighbors and then later claim it as theirs. People living in central and western Africa claim the Egyptian civilization when they had no connection to it. Same as the Western/Northern Europeans claiming Hellenic/Minoan civilization when they had no connection to it. It may be possible that the Vedic Aryans appropriated culture/history of local people as they assimilated them in the caste system.
Lol Mlecchas are beef eaters and caste system is made by God you are a rascal
@@sachinpotdar7798 Who ever made caste system is the rascal !
You are a rascal caste system is good if you do your work it is not about slavery @@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
If Mahabharata was composed in 3 century BCE then How çan Panini can mention Vasudeva and Arjuna in astadhayay who lived before 6 century bce 😅
Yes, the names of previous people can be told by later ones !
The period of Panini is only assumption !
01:58. I really don't know around other interpretation..
" the Rigavedas came from ? Santa Lucia ? (LoL)".. which is too amazing.(?!?)
Let's talk..to travel large distance one has to travel on Horses. Let's take starting point from Central Asir or Europe , if one need to migrate to India from them one would use horse(at that time there were no cars or trains)
Now to travel such large distance horse "BRIDLE" as well "noseband "is used.
The thing is it wasn't developed until 1000 BC.
Now horses are there in India atleast 1600BC.
Horses are not from India yet somehow came to India in 1600 BC yet we know that to travel such large distance via horse one need bridle as well noseband. It's to maintain balance .Which were developed 1000bc...almost .600 yrs apart.
Things doesn't add up.
There were vedic horses in India 34 Ribs. I feel like I need to bveat sense into Indians.
Romilla Thapar is a prejudiced mind. There are more of her tribe. Anyway this is a complex subject and cannot be narrated in simplistic matter.
Indians were mixed neolithic iranian farmers, south Asian hunter gatherers, Indo European aryans...
Just like Europeans, they were mixed European Hunter gatherers, neolithic Anatolians farmers, Indo European
Sister first get you facts right before even blabbering about AMT.. Pls don't spread wrong information just for the sake of views..🙏
rakhighari excavations clearly says, tamil ethnic irula tribe DNA and indus skeleton DNA both are same...note my point this DNA not match other locations ex.india, pakistan afganistan, bangladesh. north indians also indus origins. but they mixed with aryan steppies.they lost indus culture and follow the vedic culture.
😂 no , it's just they found hunter gathers ancestry of indus that still highest intect in irula tribe
All Indian has hunter gathers, Neolithic ancestory
Yeah that's fact ..the Skeletal DNA contain Dravidian DNA along with other indigenous DNA but it did not Contains Aryan DNA that are found in most north indian now ...
Its very interesting from historical and demographic point of view.
@@greaterbharat4175 indian sub continent people all are indus origins destruction of before indus valley...but after the indus period russia ukraine region steppies slowly migrated to india... these people DNA not match south asian continent and also this dna matched into ukraine region archeological sites...
@@kuttysathish8675 Where are these Russian & Ukrainian people migrated to Indus Valley NOW?
@@kuttysathish8675arya culture lol we are created by God arya do you understand universe creation how it happens aryan theory
Homo Sapein Nagas originated in Africa and migrated into the Levant. They established in Anatolia Levant and Causases region as Aryans >13 000 BC.
The group that moved easwards were the Indo-Aryans until they teached the sapta sindhu river system. Shiva released the glacial waters after the glacial melt.and establishethe Saraswati River Civilization.
Gobelki Tempe is in eastern Turkey.
DNA analysis support the migration across the Iranian plateau.
Don't be chauvinistic.
The common root of English and Sanskrit occurred 8000 BC in Iranian plateau.
Ancient and contemporary migrations are non -linear. Contemporary Migrations mirror the plausibility of Ancient migratory trajectories over space and time. The scale of Romani migrations out of India challenges the notion that all proto-Indo European migration was outbound from Europe in a linear pattern. Seeking patterns of plausibility is the basis of establish a scientific premise..The only thing "stupid" about it is one's failure to comprehend this fundamental.
Sister many nature calamity came & destroyed such things example harrpa civilization then why duwarka & ram setu type of things didn't?
Plzz say about this
Yoiu have tobring proof not him. You failed.
So called dwaraka is an old IVC dravidian port city . It has nothing to do with vedic lies .
So caleed rama sethu has nothing to do with ramayana.
It was by native tamils construction !
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Maybe duwarka..but rem setu is Adam bridge which made by Britishers
@@rahulparewa6535 The name adams bridge is also fake .
It was a natural sand path from peninsular india to the island .
When sea level started to rise , people placed stones in order to avoid walking on water .
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg that's made by Britishers bruh coz for their business 👍
If u doubt u can vene see how much advance that bridge
There are some crucial documentary evidences that hold the key to determine as to whether or not there was migration from central Asia. 1) The treaty between the Mittanians and the Hittites speaks about the Hindu gods like Indra, Varina, Agni etc. and they figure as the principle witnesses for the treaty. The said treaty was concluded not in Indian soil but in central Asia. This document gives credence to the migration theory. 2) There is an invocation hymn in Rig veda where in, the early Aryans invoked and sought the help of mighty Indira to vanquish the people living in the fortified forts. Obviously this hymn refers to Indus valley people. Indra is also known as Purandhara meaning destroyer of forts. These two unimpeachable evidences clearly demonstrate that there was migration and such migrations ultimately resulted in conflicts.
Mattani used later Vedic Sanskrit, Vedic people and Sanskrit was already available in India
@@profrajeshmaurya5078 Could you please shed more light on your observations.
@@ckneelakantaraj7829 most linguist find Mattani language to New Vedas including Shrikant Talagiri and others.
Aryans were native to India if anything really happened then it was people moving out of India, the work found was actually an later version of Sanskrit which shares vocabulary with the later written manadals of rig Veda. While the older mandalas written have a lot different vocabularies. There is an in-depth research done by Shrikanth talageri ji on this great work you should check out.
@@profrajeshmaurya5078 the horse was brought in by Arayan invasion as well as the ethnic caste system? Or do u have another Indian theory .. Arayan the term meant civilized ones and were the nobility like Buhdda who was u guessed it Arayan and white
Sindhu Saraswati culture is Vaidik civilization...👍🚩
Discription in vedas are exactly same as geographical locations.
It is a myth
Aryan came to india but before 10000 to 12000 years ago
They were Iranian hunter gatherers , not steppe aryans !
My country is named Iran, not India, and nothing has remained of Aryan people in India, based on Avesta and what Zartosht said we are Aryan people, and our DNA shows we have lots of Yamnaya genes, as our language, traditions, and culture can show that, it's easy to compare the Persian language with germanic languages and Understanding Indian is more close or Persian or Avestan, or comparing with proto indo-european language, definitely Persian
The vedic mythology have many similarities as the Nordic mythologies. As wel in the language. They came from the same area, which was north Iran.
Why is it that everything outstanding always comes from somewhere else, and typically from Europe? The Aryan migration theory is a western invention. The argument is biassed and sounds like self-denial that Europeans were significantly more primitive than people of the Indian subcontinent.
Sure europeans were primitive lol Dna Doesn't lie What else doesn't lie is that every creature's comfort that surrounds you is a European Invention . Thank your lucky stars you have European d. N. A. Or you would look Like a sentinel islander .
You are right. I am sad so many self hating dumb ill educated indians full of self hatred and lies. People have said I follow Vedic fighting. I do.
Indus valley civilization had women as priest & high priest. Which vedic period promoted such culture.
Produce the evidence. I see mother goddesses but the other part no.
How can you say Rig Veda began in 1500 BCE when it has been proved with the help of Astronomy as well as carbon dating that Mahabharat occurred in 5000 plus BCE and Ramayan occurred in 12000 plus BCE. You really need to study and listen to Nilesh Oak videos and educational sessions. RETRAIN.
Which carbon datings proved ramayana and mahabharatha ?
Your first statement claiming that the modern academics believe the Rig Veda came from the central Asia itself has gone wrong. Modern academics never claim such. They claim the Aryans came from the central Asia and later composed the Rig Veda in the Sapta Sindhu area. You need to do a little research on this matter before doing a video about this topic
Indian Nationalism be like
"yeah and one day for no reason at all we decided to create horses, invent chariots, then beat the f**k out of ourselves."
Anglosaxons be like
" We will show the world light of freedom by colonising them , dividing them ,looting them and distorting their history in such a way that it will always make them inferior to us although for the history which we will tell we not give any proof " that's why Aryan Invasion Theory is now turned to Aryan migration theory .... please tell oh great looters of Great Britain how you were able to coin the Aryan Invasion theory at first place ? 😅😅😅😅
valliya information aanu moley
Dont try to twist history , history of india started before Aryan migration,predated by IVC Dravidian s , why rakigiri genetic study did not confirm R1a aryan gene , because it is Dravidian.
How many skeletons tested.
aryanz came from west & entered in ur ansistorz buuuuzzzzzz 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The Arya is just a saying elderly person.
No movement of people involved.
Chanakya was very respected person
Buddha did not belong to kshatriya.
They did not have any classic rules.
During Buddha time there was classification.
They did not know Bhagavad Gita, Ramayan Mahabharat, Sanskrit.
"Dasa" means servent and not enemy
Genetically we are all Africans unless we find a lucy here, so why the hysteria.
No, the AASI genetic ancestry is unique to India as also andamanese !
It is not there anywhere else !
@@sachinpotdar7798 Whether by god or ghost , humans are not divided by caste or colour , All are created with equal respectability .
There is nothing as noblity or lower birth !
That is what thiru valluvar says " pirappokkum ella uyirkkum " meaning all are born equal .!
AASI is the genetic ancestry common to both north and south indians , but not others !
@@sachinpotdar7798 Do you want to say that the skin colours you told refer to the four varnas as told in bhagavath geetha ?
The indian Savannas comedy doesn't stop repeat the same old lies even though we have plenty of evidence of genetics. Linguistics and historical proving the Aryans coming to India. Whether it is migration or invasion that is a secondary debate.
The caste favouritism manuvadi mentality & White rascist mentality r more or less similar.
Every community in d world, during pastoral economy ,were wanderers.
It is quite possible that one group of aryans went to Europe & another towards India.
Any how we Indians want a harmonious -cooperating one another communities.
It may be a caste,creed, language........
White people are The least racist people in the world . Compare white societies with any other Culture
The empirical evidences of Archaeology, Linguistics, Myths and gods, food all points to a simple explanation. The Indus Valley Civilization flourished before the Vedic religion. After the demise of the IVC, the aryans arrived from the steppes of Europe. There was aryan immigration but no invasion as there werent much left for conflict. The amalgamation of the culture, myths and gods of the remnants of the IVC who mostly migrated down south, mostly probably via the Western coast rather than the land route which were densly forrested, resulted in the Hindu or Sanatana Dharma. The IVC people might have been monotheistic religion centered around a proto Siva shown as 'Pasupati', Lord of Cattle. The aryan nature gods of Indra, Varuna, Soma, Rudra etc. mixed and later gave rise to deities like Shiva (amalgamated with Rudra), Vishnu (amalgamation of many Nature gods of the aryans) later on a host of other minor and major gods. The vedic gods of Indra, Varuna etc. were relegated to minor gods status. The mixing of the aryans with the indigenous remanants of the IVC, tribals already living in the forests gave rise to the varna (caste) system, probably imposed by the aryans as they came down as far as the gangetic plains.
Read about real Mitanni orfigins. Honestly my father was right. He said Indians have become unintelligent greedy co
wards.
Don't talk of fake Romila Thapar. Where is Aryan migration. Please don't talk of rubbish.
@ your reasoning does not snyc with your thread. Indo Iranian has nothing to do with Europeans,The Caucasians went West and East. The Vedic language which is defunct and disappeared after blending with Indian languages which gave birth to prakrt languages over a period of time. Indus civilization was probably Dravidian with some Iranian influence. To say that there is no evidence today is faulty. DNA evidence points otherwise. Asuras were a blended race of the areas which is todays Southern Russia , Afghanistan ,Turkey and Iran. We can say that they were not Aryans we speak about, who came to invade their lands. We need more research and concrete evidence. Reciting the Rig or the other vedas which are not historical documents may cause confusion or distortion of true history.
Asuras are demons you rascal
Completely discarding linguistic, archaeological and scientific evidence of academically established Aryan migration.
She says hoaxarian Romila Thapar an academia.
...the Vedic homeland
Aryan is not a Sanskrit word. The word “Arya” is a title like”Sir” Sir is not a race nor is Arya.
Sir these people don't need the facts. They all enjoy the sycophancy bullying stories to keep corrupting Indian History. Some to please their beloved parties and some to divide the society to benefit their political propaganda.
Why are lower casts black and dark in color. Low economicaly.
You have completely circumvented this Indian reality.
Lower castes are black because of vileness and mode of material nature ignorance arrogance
Aryan are intelligents 🎉
Vedic Aryan period billions years old lady learn manvantar yug time cycles
There is no proof for intelligent humans from those times !
My Rabbits have only 3 legs - are called eminent historians. My Rabbits have 4 legs - are called right wing historians.
Not so clear
in Europe it is the right wing which supports the AIT.
What is this low effort research 😂😂 reading from wikipedia ☕
Arya battle against indian dasha
Some people mention about Vedaas. 1) In Rigveda it clearly mentioned ARYANS and NON ARYANS ( DASYAS). It is also clearly mentioned that Aryans killed and destyored the Dasyas. DASYAS means NATIVE INDIAN DRAVIDIANS. Indus valley people are Dravidians 2) one more thing is -- If we read the history of ancient Greek/Roman, there you will find that those people treated their KINGS as their GODs. The same thing happened in Aryans. ARYANS also treated their kings as GODs. The KING OF KINGS INDRA was TREATED as a GOD by the ARYANS in RIGVEDA. But these things are NOT FOUND IN INDUS VALLEY CIVILISATION.
😂😂😂😂. Muslims mentioning Vedas. As if they have written it. Which Rigveda Verse you are talking about dear. In samskrit shkil number please.
One information i will tell you, Aryans are still livin' in this country, only those people knows about them, that's them only. Nobody else. 😂😂😂.
They are only in 10000 count in reality. Muslims and Vedas. 😅😅. What a Joke
Yu our knowledge is full of s"it. Aryans worshipped paramatma sachidanand. And Nobody else. They worship now also that only.
And dear Vedas don't talk history at all. It only talks about knowledge. So next time bring Samskrit shloka for confirmation. Not West or😂 translated s*it
If one wants to correctly interpret Rig Veda one should learn Russian/Lithuanian/English. The current meaning/interpretation of Rigvedic words is different from the original meaning. Shrikant Talageri said 'Arya' means 'our' (Similar to english) , later it became noble etc, 'Indra' original meaning means male strength which is like 'Andrew' (male force) in English. Similarly 'Amrit' means 'immortal', later it became a drink which does not cause death.Amrit Gadiya became good muhurat' .Rudra/Roudra means 'Red'/'Rude' which is a characteristic of Lord Shiva. Roudra means ferocious in current generation. Rama means 'relaxed'/rest as in Hindi aaraam. Not many know the literal meaning of it today. Sanskrit was considered as a 'secret' language in ancient India.I think priestly class are only care takers of Vedas/Sanskrit.Their mother tongue is not Sanskrit
@Sitangsu Das no I hate congress. I listen to RSS song daily. But want to speak facts.
your etymologies are totally wrong
@@sohamshinde7978 then tell me this Nakt- Night(raat in Hindi) , Shri - Sir ( ji in Hindi) , anthar - inter (beech in Hindi) , vahan - vehicle (ghaadi in Hindi) .. Sanskrit and English are so closely related than Hindi. Hindi is a different IE branch. Proto IE might have originated in India. Then might have gone to Central Asia (became Vedic/Russian/Lith/ Avestan). Came back to India . But could not replace sister IE branches (Pali and Jain/Buddhist ) languages.
@@uniqguy111 hindi is more closely related to sanskrit than hindi coz sanskrit is derived from prakrit which is then derived from sanskrit
I wish to thank you from the bottom of my heart for relieving the pressure of the Russian war that has forced me to abandon learning Ruski. Laughter is the best medicine and my inability to learn Russian as you suggested due to the above mentioned war... 🤣
Vedda.❤
Madam, Great Job.
As a Zoroastrian
I believe and many of us do
That our prophet was born 28 march 1768 bc
Around 1500 bc there was conflict between mazdayasnians who were anti daevas and those who were pro daevas
The pro daevas lost or simply left the area moving south
Hence the Aryan invasion
Another wave of whites came in roughly 2000 years ago
The sakas , also from central asia
They were displaced from their lands by the turks
Ever heard of vargasira battle? Google it and find out the truth.....
None of these people are white. Stop it.
Her sauce is pretty thin and unconvincing.
Genetics can prove it
We cant talk of FACTS to sycophancy bullies. They keep saying their Rabbits have only 3 legs !!
Sanatan Vaidik Dharma ki jai...🚩🚩🚩
Very interesting video, well delivered.
Of course, the debate based on Rig Veda - Linguistics and even archeology is being superseded by archeogenetics. And genetics is conclusively proving Indo European Migration Theory.
With regards to river Saraswati, its probably either river Helmland/ Haraxvati in Afghanistan. Rajesh Kocchar's book 'Vedic Indians' gives a discussion about it:
"To sum up, the available literary and scientific data suggest the following hypotheses: i. The stage when the Satluj and Yamuna flowed into the Ghaggar was long over before the Harappan times. ii. During the early and mature Harappan periods, the Ghaggar- Hakra channel was perhaps perennial or nearly so, to be able to sustain population groups on its lower course. iii. In about 1700 BC, the water supply diminished further, desiccating the lower part of the Ghaggar channel and forcing the later- period Harappans to migrate upstream to the Shivalik region. iv. In about 1400 BC there arrived, from the northwest, the Ṛgvedic people who gave to the upper course of the Ghaggar the name (Vinaśana) Sarasvatī after the nadītamā Sarasvatī (Hel- mand) they had left behind in Afghanistan. "
VED IS ETERNAL. SANSKRIT IS ETERNAL LANGUAGE. THE LANGUAGE OF GOD. BRAHMMA CREATED SANSKRIT LANGUAGE AND BY THIS LANGUAGE ALL LIVING BEING IS CREATED BY BRAHMMA. THIS UNIVERSE.THIS WAS CREATED 197 BILLION YEARS OLD. ARYANS ARE THE SONS OF BRAHMMA. CREATOR OF LIVING BEINGS. ARYANS IS CREATED IN INDIA AND BROUGHT UP I N INDIA.
We aryans migrate from Persia defeated Adivasis and dravidans it's a fact .
Saaar we wuz aryanz saaar 😭😭, No.
😂
😂nice story aryan but answer my 1 question from where steppe people came from? steppe peoples were considered ancestors of so called aryans then tell from where steppe people came from😂loser steppe peoples were residents of india its clearly prooven by your so called western historians also
you didnt defeat anyone, the aryans ended up mixing with the dravidians
Multiple people migrated over period of many years and there were wars among these tribes the so called Vedic aryans were settled mostly along saraswati river and migrated from here to bengal and west coast and are still known as saraswats these are fish eating Brahmins
Abe bsdk Aryans koi race nhi hai 😂😂😂
?
Very bad pronunciation 😠😠😠
Its majar part of pakistan afghanistan. And india ..vedam only for brahmin. ..