Aryan Origins | Migration Theory and Etymological History
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- Aryan is a designation originally meaning “civilized”, “noble”, or “free” without reference to any ethnicity. It was first applied as a self-identifying term by a migratory group of people from Central Asia later known as Indo-Iranians (who settled on the Iranian Plateau) and, later, applied to Indo-Aryans (who traveled south to settle northern India).
The word had no widespread ethnic connotation prior to the 19th century CE other than its usage by the Persians (known as 'Iranians' from 'Aryans') to distinguish themselves from their Muslim Arab conquerors in the 7th century CE, and even then (it could be argued) it was not so much an ethnic distinction as one of class and personhood. Prior to the conquest, Persia had been “the land of the Aryans” and, afterwards, a term was coined for non-Aryans.
'Aryan' became associated with ethnicity and, especially, with light-skinned (Caucasian) superiority, only after Western European scholars began translating, and often misinterpreting, Sanskrit texts in the 18th and more extensively in the 19th centuries CE. Theories had been advanced earlier regarding a correlation between Sanskrit and European languages, but this concept was popularized by the Anglo-Welsh philologist Sir William Jones (l. 1746-1794 CE) in 1786 CE who claimed there was a common source for these languages which he called Proto-Indo-European.
Jones' claim inspired later writers to identify this “common source” and encouraged the French elitist Joseph Arthur de Gobineau (l. 1816-1882 CE) to develop the racist theories concerning “Aryan Blood” and White Supremacy which would become popularized in Germany through the works of Houston Stewart Chamberlain (l. 1855-1927 CE), the British-born political philosopher who would become Adolf Hitler's mentor and inspiration as well as informing the ideology and work of Alfred Rosenberg (l. 1893-1946 CE) which empowered the Nazi Party in Germany c. 1930-1945 CE.
Jones' claim would also influence the work of the German philologist Max Muller (l. 1823-1900 CE) who, in attempting to identify this “common source” via the Rig Veda and the history of the Indus Valley Civilization, created the myth of an Aryan Invasion of the region which claimed light-skinned Aryans conquered darker-skinned indigenous people and established high civilization; an interpretation of his work which Muller himself never intended and, in fact, repudiated.
The work of Gobineau, Chamberlain, and the Aryan Invasion claim would be embraced by the British throughout the 19th and 20th centuries CE to justify their control of India as they were the “Aryans” - a superior race - who were bringing culture and civilization to the less fortunate. This view was encouraged and popularized by the work of the British archaeologist Sir Mortimer Wheeler (l. 1890-1976 CE) who excavated the ancient Indus Valley Civilization cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro and claimed his finds supported Muller's Aryan Invasion theory. Just as the fair-skinned Aryans of old had brought civilization to India, Wheeler claimed, so now had the British.
Most of Wheeler's work has been discredited in the modern day, as has Muller's invasion theory, and the works of every contributor to a definition of Aryan as referencing Caucasian have equally been dismissed as either misguided, misinterpretations, or intentionally racist. In the present day, the term is understood to properly refer to the early Indo-Iranian and Indo-Aryan migratory group, possibly originally from the region of the Ural River or, according to some scholars, to the Indo-Iranians only based on the continued usage of the term by the great Persian Empires of the Near East.
Link to original article titled Aryan by Joshua J. Mark
www.worldhistory.org/Aryan/
Website : www.ancient.eu/
CZcams Channel : / ancienteu
Twitter : / ahencyclopedia
Instagram : / ahencyclopedia
Facebook : / ahencyclopedia
Check out our store! History Merch: / thestudyofantiquityand...
Get your history magazines here: www.karwansaraypublishers.com?tap_a=88561-7cbe2d&tap_s=1562085-46f5e5
Enjoy history merchandise? Check out affiliate link to SPQR Emporium!
spqr-emporium.com?aff=3
Facebook Page:
/ thestudyofantiquityand...
Twitter: / nickbarksdale
Instagram: / study_of_antiquity_mid...
Facebook Group: / 164050034145170
To my dear subscribers, thank you all. You have my love and appreciation. Like our channel? Support us by clicking the THANKS button under the video!
Check out our store! History Merch: czcams.com/users/TheStudyofAntiquityandtheMiddleAgesstore
Patreon: www.patreon.com/make_history_matter
Get your history magazines here: www.karwansaraypublishers.com?tap_a=88561-7cbe2d&tap_s=1562085-46f5e5
*Disclaimer, the above link is an affiliate link which means we will earn a small commission from your magnificent purchase, just another way to help out the channel!
Facebook Page:
facebook.com/THESTUDYOFANTIQUITYANDTHEMIDDLEAGES/
Twitter: twitter.com/NickBarksdale
Instagram: instagram.com/study_of_antiquity_middle_ages/
Facebook Group: facebook.com/groups/164050034145170/
Please make more video on the Parthian empire
3:50 Müller was great. The high culture was a mix of Aryan and Drawid. See Harappa
The invasion happend. See the Veda. Arya Vs Mleccha
7:00 we can conclude that the central Asian nomadtribes which called themselves Arya where white
17:40 Stop! Heyerdahl never said something supremacist! He quoted logically that the Mayan had contact to Egypt
Hate to tell you but the truth is racist. Yes, a lighter more advanced class of people invaded northern India and ruled as the elite members of a caste system; and the majority of northern India's upper classes are lighter than the lower classes unto this very day.
aryan invasion theory is already debunked , even also by a british man himself , lol , you dont even know where these pepole took the aryan word , its not even aryan its arya which we call ourselves from long before 5000 years , a lot of history is recorded
That’s Reeeeeecist!
That’s not true because Jatts and Kambojs are lower caste yet are lighter than upper castes and have more West Eurasian features
There is ample evidence of advanced cities in the Indus Valley Civilization. The nomads, albeit military superior, couldn’t manage anything beyond mud huts.
@@dhruvyamdagni5858 can you tell me who debunked it? I'm curious and this subject fascinates me
In 3000 years of Iran history, it was always used as “aryan people” or “aryan lineage” and other ethnic groups like Turks are referred to as “Aniran” meaning non-aryan, but now these guys claim it has nothing to do with race….
Of course ppl never considered themselves racial groups, considering thats an 18/19th Century term, and etnos or ethnicity was specifically a Greek word synonymous with natos or [born of] nationality that migrated into European language. But Id like to see these guys explain the blondism and blue eyed caricatures of personages from India (incl Buddha) to predynastic red headed Egyptians like the mummy referred to as "Ginger" and statues of ruling elites of Egypt who had blue eyes, when Blue eyes is a recessive trait that emerged proto Indo European peoples around the Black Sea approx 6-8000 years bpe. Protip you cant do it. Blondism and Red hair are purely N. European traits and Blue eyes was a trait the expanded out from a single PIE mating pair. All the wordplay in the world cant dismiss the fact that IE peoples from N. India/Pakistan/Kaffiristan to Iran to N. Africa to Europe are all from one shared lineage and were at least part of the ruling classes of all the relevant nations of history. We are brothers and sisters.
I think they had a concept of race, but otherwise true and true. Modern genetics has proven the migration of fair haired blue eyed ppl from the Eurasian steppe.
Also, Aryan refers to the people of the age of Aries. Atlantian descendants.
@@NegativeBodhiImage the mummies with red hair is a result of tobacco that they use during the mummification process. Nothing to do with European or caucasians
@@NegativeBodhiImage blue eyes and lighter skin are not characteristic or exclusivity of Europeans. Stop being manipulated by racist uncultured scientists and Eurocentric enterprises
But it have matters with slavs,since aryans are slavic people.And this SAMA chanel is lying to you,just like other 'history chanels'.I know that some people don't know this,but its been proven long time ago,than aryans are slavs who has come to india in 8000BC.They just don't want you to know real truth,so wake up man.
The word āryan is often found in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain texts. In the Indian spiritual context, it can be applied to Rishis or to someone who has mastered the four noble truths and entered upon the spiritual path.
its found in almost all indoeuropean languages from the european atlantic coast in the west to india in the east.
Arya means followers of vedas
@@IAMTHEINVINCIBLE1 there are 4 Vedas
@@human8454 yes, rigveda, yajurveda, samveda, atharvaveda
not only. @@IAMTHEINVINCIBLE1
Irony: one of the ethnic groups persecuted, and murdered by the supposedly "pure Aryan" Natzis were the Romani aka "Gypsies", who were actually an lndo-Aryan group.
I think it was Hermann Goering who said, I decide who is Aryan and who is not.
Not really. The people who originally invented the Aryan term and identity were almost certainly the Andronovo people, who were genetically European. These people then mixed with the Bactria-Margiana Archeological Complex(BMAC) and this mixed group then invaded Iran and the Indus Valley
@@user-pf4tn2rl9n that's because most central and western Europeans are R1b. R1a is not the only "Aryan" haplotype
@@alexdunphy3716 That's a misinformed opinion. First of all saying Andronovo were "European" is wrong to start with. Yes, they shared huge genetic similarity with Corded Ware Culture of Europe, but neither of them had any common understanding of "Europeaness" it's like saying Yamnaya were Siberian, cuz they derived a huge part of their ancestry from Ancestral North Eurasians. The European identity is a modern construct, not applicable to these ancient people. Secondly, it's not certain if or not Andronovo themselves started calling themselves Aryans before they started migrating south towards BMAC. It's equally plausible that they came with this whole idea of Aryan identity after migrating into BMAC, when they mixed with the Iran-Chalcolithic Farmers of Oxus civilization (who's land they inhabited) infact Andronovo Homeland was itself situated over the Oxus Homeland which means there was mixing even before their migration southwards, Eastern sites of Andronovo show even mixing with East Eurasian populations. Finally, there's no evidence of any large scale "invasion" of Indus Valley Civilization (peaking arounf 2000 BCE), infact it was already mostly gone by the time Indo-Aryans migrated into India (1500 BCE). Hence it is more plausible that the process was more of a migration (settlement with no major aim of subjugation, with possible minor skirmishes here and there) rather than full on invasion .
@@alexdunphy3716 Nope, Aryan Haplogroup is exclusively R1a1a, there's almost 0 evidence of R1b being present in either Andronovo or even Sintashta. R1b is not related to Indo-Iranians at all.
Love indians so much from Persia ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Love you too bro
From india
🙏🤍🙏from Goa, India!
Ancient Iranians( Persians) also called their language( Old Persian) "Arya"
Ancient Iranian didn't worship allah 😂 they were Hindus
@@ALOK-pe5fp Zoroastrian actually, learn to accept other peoples identities, if you want to respected too
@@ALOK-pe5fp Persian used to practice Mithraism and Zarthostrianism
@@ALOK-pe5fp emotional demage 😭🤣🤣😂
@@peymankoohi8195 before that 😂😂😂
They were too invented from caves 😂😂
This is precisely why I believe Ancient history is so vital in our elementary schools, and should be presented in depth, and not simply skipped over in one or two chapters (paragraphs). Young people want and need to know who they are, and where they came from, and, that they all have value. And "Value" is not dictated by skin color.
Sh I had it saved ,I can't find it anymore ,- they are trying too bury the history of the Aryan Race ,,because Others feel the word is too strong !!
I believe your right ,but this guy is teaching somthing that is not Accurate,,The Real Aryan Writings Are so hard to get ,,from Sumerian Times ,,it's the Actual Begining Race of white people ,,,I came across some of this stuff on the computer,wi
@@michaelarnold1672 that's crazy
The Aryan invasion theory into India has been debunked maybe you should consider the out of India theory which they're trying to hide & do have evidence one being the DNA marker of European House mice which comes from India & we all know where caravans of people go their animals follow too!!!
@@marasimix9369 Thank you, I'm open to all sources of info.
Thank you so much for sharing this information in such a lovely pictorial presentation.
The title of the video is a little misleading, it was more about the debunking of aryan invasion and the unfortunate marring of the study of aryans by 20th C race politics. There is however a lot that wasn’t discussed, like the actual evidence of Aryan origins and migration, since they did actually exist. Didn’t talk about linguistic origins and data. And then at the end made the suggestion that everyone can be aryan regardless of skin colour. That seems silly to me, why do people need to be called aryan to be considered noble or civilised or cultured? I got so confused at that point and started to think this was actually more a polemic in favour of a certain political position, especially given the misleading title. Bit of a shame because the aryans are such an interesting and influential group.
Aryan Invasion Theory has been debunked. You're right, it's because of the "race politics" that this identity was thrust upon the people of the Indian subcontinent.
@@jimhalpert3269 Who debunked it? Do you understand that there are people in India who have blonde hair and blue eyes and who live up around the Himalayas, these are not people who descended from the British occupation. These are organic Indians. The _Kalash_ people of Pakistan are ideal Hitler Aryans, they all have blonde hair and blue eyes and they worship the ancient Indian gods.
@Amal Paniker "Thou Indra, art destroyer of the cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, the lord of the skies"
Rig Veda VIII- 87.6
"Indra, the slayer of Vrittra, the destroyer of cities, has scattered the Dasyu hosts sprang from a black womb." Rig Veda II 20.6
The Rig Veda praises the god who "destroyed the Dasyans and protected the Aryan color". Rig Veda III 34.9
It goes on to thank the god who "bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the water". Rig Veda I 100.18
"Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshiper, he subdued the lawless for Manu, he conquered the black skin"
"Black skin is impious" Rig Veda II 12.4
"One car-wheel of the sun thou rollest forward , and one thou settest free to roll for Kutsa. Thou slewest noseless Dasyus with thy weapon" Rig Veda V 29.10
"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away" Rig Veda IX 41.1
"With him too is this rain of him that comes like herds: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard. When the sweet juice is shed he seeks the pleasant place, and stirs the worshiper as wind disturbs the wood." Rig Veda X 23.4
"At the sweet draft the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the iron one with yellow beard and yellow hair, he will bear his bay steeds over all distress". Rig Veda X 96.8
"He hath slayed Dasyus after his wont, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters." Rig Veda I 100.18
I was looking for a lot of similar information and sort of disappointed at its absence too. There’s a CZcams channel that shares mythology and history including Indian history and it actually sites the invasion theory and even connects that to the foundation of caste. So I wanted to see what other information was available about “Aryan people”. I think this video is useful in a completely different way. Racism, white supremacy, and European influence can be observed in most parts of the world and to think that the misinterpretation of Vedic texts can be considered one of its roots is astounding to me. I feel more inclined to learn about India because of how much it’s indirectly impacted the world in this dimension.
this video was a let down.period.
The word Arya is used in Vasistha Dharma Sutras as follows:
The country of the Âryas (Âryâvarta) lies to the east of the region where (the river Sarasvatî) disappears, to the west of the Black-forest, to the north of the Pâripâtra (mountains), to the south of the Himâlaya. 8
(According to others it lies to the south of the Himâlaya) and to the north of the Vindhya range (being limited east and west by the two oceans). 9
Acts productive of spiritual merit, and customs which (are approved of) in that country, must be everywhere acknowledged (as authoritative);
But not different ones, (i.e. those) of (countries where) laws opposed (to those of Âryâvarta prevail).
Some (declare the country of the Âryas to be situated) between the (rivers) Gaṅgâ and Yamunâ.
These texts clearly indicates that the Aryavarta exist in only in India between the Himalayas and Vindhyachal mountains and they no where mentions about facial features or anything whether they rely on the fact Arya is a person of high spiritual merit pure who performs certain rituals which other people don't as u can see
2.103. But he who does not (worship) standing in the morning, nor sitting in the evening, shall be excluded, just like a Sudra, from all the duties and rights of an Aryan
It's New delhi where our ancestors resided and since it's our capital lfmao
This is a very well made presentation on the subject. Thank you.
The illustrations used to show Harappan civilisation were impressive. Can you please mention the sources of these illustrations ? I want to read further on them. Thank you.
2:00 minutes in and there’s already a few in accuracies. A little more and this video is not about origins but about racism, not Aryans and does nothing to shed light on history. When saying myth, it’s clear this a political video, not a historical video of origins. It’s all about twentieth century racist theory.
100% political propaganda. This video is the opposite of enlightening.
Seems like almost everyone here in the comments is an "expert" on Aryans.
The word expert had lost all meaning. The word has become just as skewed and meaningless as the word racism.
Seems like there is a agenda against it...
Seems like some people think knowing things like history is bad.
@@coreyleavell6921 Guess it depends on the version...
Sure, I guess. But there's undeniable genetic research that contradicts some of the claims here. People know this because they follow news about genetics because it's interesting and we are all curious about our origins. That's it.
Ethnic empowerment is a strange subject. Its seen as good when the subject ethnicity is on the bottom of the social hierarchy, but bad when the subject is at the top.
Yeah, it’s so sad in a way. Everyone seems to want to jump to value judgements immediately. It would be so cool if we could talk about ethnicity and the genetic makeup of a population without assuming that it’s about superiority or anything. Obviously this whole topic has been abused by racist pseudo science in the past, but it’s not very helpful to just try to reverse the entire narrative to make people feel better.
If we keep assigning so much meaning and value to anyones ethic/racial superiority, humanity is probably never going to overcome racism. Just because one population was conquered by the other, the descendants of the conquered population are somehow lesser people? That’s just such a backwards mindset.
Sorry for the rant, I just got super confused by this kind of stuff in the past to the point where I thought that there was never any kind of aryan migration. Until it came up in one of my classes where it was mentioned by an Iranian professor of mine and I asked if it was actually still scientific consensus. I felt so stupid for just buying into this Out Of India narrative when all the evidence seems to point in a different direction.
But yeah, I hope that some day we can just collectively move on from even feeling that ethnic empowerment is even necessary. Kind of reminds me of the whole Olmec head thing that has been going on.
Oh lol I’m so sorry for ranting, that wasn’t intentional but I guess it’s a good thing to have a conversation about this kind of stuff 🙃
@@algepaca The inability to entertain such subject matter and not let it devolve into “my race is better than yours” is an indicator of the state of intellectualism today.
@@algepaca no worries. It was a good rant. All things that needed to be said.
It's also good when an ethnicity wants to claim to be a powerless, persecuted minority, but really hold all the power.
Learning all this later in life,would have been very nice to have learned this earlier when I was younger and teach others to get along with each other.We are more related than we think we are.
same here learning all these at 30, education/school system sucks it was nothing but to earn good grades.
I wonder why it's not mandatory taught in college. I believe if everyone we're to learn this it would end racism by skin color. In truth according to this video. If we're civilized that makes us all Aryan no matter what our skin color.
@@jimgeorge3273 grow up, the reason is because Aryans still exist and some people control the world, history is written by the victors.
@@jugg9140 America and most so the European countries are not racist take your hate elsewhere. Move to some country where others think like yourself. We won't lose any sleep over losing all you America haters.
I don't believe America is a racist country. In fact I thinknthe exact opposite.
the aryan settlers pretty clearly subjugated the people and were distinct in appearence and the colorism in india is deeply engrained in the caste system to this day so i dont see how its not ethnic or racial. that claim seems politically motivated.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 my understanding isnt complete enough to coherently explain why youre wrong i typed a reply that got pretty messy. either way its sad to me that indians seem to choose nationalism and anti colonial sentiment over reason and science when it comes to this. "we dont like you guys so we now change history" is a rather pathic act of revenge.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 im willing to accept any theory thats widely acclaimed by the scientific community and i do my best to understand genetics though youre right i dont understand it very deeply. in my original post i am asking a question to better understand however i was met by indian centric theories that seem to generally be disregarded. any type of agenda is always misplaced in science.
Well it was a moral caste system which was initially ruled by lighter people though it started off religiously than through time did it become a racial caste system
@@RedVelvetBlackleather the lighter people were the descendants of aryans who always thought themselves superior and thus were the ruling castes thats racist from the start
@@StaminatorBladerstop projecting your racist theories on us. Caste system was originally based on ones action(karma) and gunas(quality). And this sort of hierarchy is common in indo european cultures. Later on , it became hierarchal. Has nothing to do with skin color. And viewing everything on the basis of skin color, misses the point completely. For reference read, purusha suktam of the rigveda.
As a linguist it’s a far fetched idea to described the Arians and protoarians as a non ethnic group, and only a some kind of ‘noble people’ with no common or cultural traits. The effort of culturally neutralize the idea of an Aryan people is more a reflection of your own projections on culture based on the result of the distorsión of these ideas in Europe in the last two centuries. There is no relation between the historical Aryans and your own ideas of race and culture.
Aryan was used to refer to Sanskrit speaking upper-caste Hindu and Buddhists in India
There certainly was some ethnic implications however later the term was used to imply Indianized people as civilized as opposed to Mlecchas the barbarians
@Khushal mithra
Ofcourse it does
Only the twice born sacred thread wearing dwijas were considered Aryans
@Khushal mithra
Who said Indus valley was Dravidian ?
Dravidian itself is a mixed community of Indian hunter gathereres and Iranian farmers
Didn't Buddha have blue eyes ?
@@tamjansan1154
There is no evidence for that and its unlikely
But its not impossible since blue and green eyes are not uncommon in India
Green is however more present more than blue
@@ceoofthebaseddepartment4979 Old Buddist script ( Pali Canon) say that one of his physical characteristics are blue eyes. He is depicted with blue eyes on many occasions.Besides there is no physical evidence for 80% of scientific and historic theories but they are presented as truth in schools and media.
This is your best todate - and most important. Thank you very, very much.
Fascinating subject; wonderful presentation. It's a keeper!
Very well presented the best I have heard till now. Will be nice if you can continue on this by discussion on 1) Rig Veda talks about REGIONS ONLY within Asia mainly India, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan 2) Was any Sanskrit like alphabhets used outside Indian subcontinent?(not words) 3) What percentage of migration took place into India ? 4) Who will the migrants into India call a Arya the Mohinjidaro people who were settled down so well with all knowlege of food, archtecture and what not or themselves 5) Any books outside matching Rig Veda. 7) All New Arch. discoveries in TamilNadu,North India
Rig Veda described only parts of India. Not Asia.
Writing from that period has not survived. We have archaic brahmi in Sri Lanka. Before that it's mostly like Indus valley seals.
Very interesting presentation.
What is CE? Is that the same as BC?
Common era now used instead of ac
Thanks for a well researched and scholarly presentation.
Indo-European aren't Aryan but Aryan peaple are Indo-European.
Aryan or Arya/Aria(Iranain version) is self identity and nationality of Iranian peaple.
Iran/Eran=ir/er+an (plural suffix)
Aniran( a persian word )means non- Iranian(non-arya ).this word used for other non- iranian people included Greek,Roman,turk,Arab...
Even ancient Europeans didn't self identify themselves as arya/aria or aryan, eg, greek.
Herodotus wrote:
Persian people self identified as aria/aryan and also others identified persian as aria /arya peaple.
He was greek and he didn't use aria/arya for greek or other European.
I am pretty sure arya/aryan is mentioned atleast a million times in ancient vedic hindu texts... I think iranians stole from indians
@@scienceseekerresearcher6130 Of course.
Iranians came later than Indians.
They use the word Arya but don't know it's meaning. Only Indians know it's true meaning. It is not a race, it never was. It is a quality.
But Iranians don't know it, just as Germans, because these people stole the word and then reinterpret it to make it something else.
@@asmirann3636 So True....
@@asmirann3636 Iranian word Ariya not Aarya . Iranian word Ariya come Arrattas Empire of iran Parthian indian Kshatriyas czcams.com/video/Q7Jxb_ihRxE/video.html 🤔👈
@@asmirann3636 kavian dynasty Founder king Kavi Khusad Forefathers King Kavi Chayman Parthava Parthian in Rigveda defeated by BHARATRaja Sudas. czcams.com/video/Xexi6JiRepk/video.html 👈🤔
Aryan is a ethnic label used to classify ruling class light skinned people in India. the word itself means pure, and this purity is used to oppress and discriminate the so called impure dark skinned people for 5000 years. where more people than Europe, middle East, Central Asia combined lived and oppressed in India, some how the author is ignorant of this. even though he is obsessed with Sanskrit.
So why did you have a picture of Hillaire Belloc?
Wow! 👏
You have changed my life today. What a great gift 🎁. Knowledge and truth. 🙂
The author is unaware of the haplpgroup phylogenies of Indian and Iranian r1a, and the source of autosomal steppe admixture in Indo-Iranian speakers. In short it came from people who were phenotypically and genetically the same as North Eastern Europeans. That is not even disputable at this stage.
Most cultures include more than one haplogroup unless they are in a remote location. The racists today attempt to rewrite history by using today's tribalism and projecting it into the past.
Survive the Jive got his white nationalist beliefs hurt
@@marsiyahsteeltrap6536 no one ever said that haplogroup is not a mixture of different time periods and genetically different people. Not sure why you feel the need to signal to the CZcams comments that you’re not a racist but if anyone disagree with you then that makes them a racist. 🙄🤡
@@marsiyahsteeltrap6536 There are dominant haplogroups in every older group of people. These things are only racist for the race obsessed.
That's also what I was taught by a highly respected Archeologist and World history professor. He also told us about the incredibly racist, national movement currently in India which is trying to "brown wash" the history of the Indus Valley Civilization. He showed us several videos of at least one, possibly 2 of the sources mentioned in this video saying incredibly racist things about white people.
Thoroughly impressed with the content and narration of this video.
What is “CI” mentioned after every date
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident - German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.
Some people say "Aryan and Dravidian race is a complete hoax", but the whole world knows that India have two distinct major linguistic group namely Indo-Aryan [Indo-European] and Dravidian Language group, namely Sanskrit and Tamil. Even though the word Dravidian coined only in later days, since it is used to represent a Distinct linguistic group. We say it as Aryan and Dravidian races namely Aryans and Ancient Tamils. NO ONE CAN DENY this fact, so "Aryan and Dravidian race is NOT a hoax"
In recent decades, the idea of an Aryan migration into India has been disputed only by Indian scholars, who claim Indigenous Aryans scenarios [Only because they do NOT want to be identified as OUTSIDERS to India]. However, these alternate scenarios are rooted in traditional and religious views on Indian history and identity and are universally rejected in mainstream scholars. Iranians are the original Aryans who invaded India from the west, this what we call it as ARYAN Invasion / Migration.
The country Name Iran itself means "Land of the Aryans" and Iranshahr. The very close relation between Iranian and Indo-Aryan groups has never been doubted. They share linguistic features to such a degree that Indo-Iranian is generally described as a distinct subgroup of Indo-European. The term Arya has been used by the Iranian people, as well as by the rulers and emperors of Iran, from the time of the Avesta.
The well-attested Indo-Iranian languages are Vedic Sanskrit, Avestan and Old Persian. Sanskrit and Avestan are very closely related languages with exact grammatical principles and numerous cognates [Blood Relative]. You can find words which are exactly identical, like Sanskrit/Avestan naman (name), ushtra (camel) etc.
The list of Vedic Sanskrit gods are - Indra, Varuna, Mitra, Soma, Rudra, Vishnu & Agni.
The list of Mittani [Syria] gods are - Indra, Varuna, Mitra and Nasatyas (Ashvins)
This proves that Vedic Sanskrit gods are similar to that of Mittani [Syria] gods. And Mittani language being older than Sanskrit proves that Rigveda originated in Syria / Iran and then moved to India.
Language, literature, epics & poems evolves every century. In Vedic/Hindu literature, Asuras (Ahuras) are bad guys while Devas are heroes. In Zoroastrian/Persian literature, Ahuras (Asuras) are heroes while Daevas are the villains.
When the Vedic Aryans moved further, they arrived in the Indian subcontinent they were faced by the native Dravidians, Dravidians that got conquered were placed as low caste in Vedic Aryan society. The Vedic Aryans continued to call the enemy as “Asuras", but the description of the Asuras changed to Dravidians (i e. present day south-Indians) with dark skin, large facial hair etc.
This is another proof for Rigveda evolving in Syria / Iran [Persia] and moved to Indian sub-continent. Initially Asuras (Ahuras) were referring to Zoroastrian/Persian and in later days Asuras were used to refer Dravidians.
We have all the proofs for Aryan invasion in Rig Veda itself. Dasyus were the people who lived in India when the Aryans arrived here. They were having a dark-skin and flat noses. Battles depicted in the R̥gveda are directly referring to Aryans migrating into India which is native land of dark skinned people Dravidians. Rig Veda - Dasa: 54 hymns and 63 verses and Dasyus: 65 hymns, 80 verses. The accounts of conflict between the Aryans and the Dasas and Dasyus are acknowledged in Rig Veda.
Rig Veda describes that Dasas and Dasyus were people who do not perform sacrifices. Aryans had to fight with these people for land. The Aryans defeated them and did not treat them well. The Aryan chief who overpowered Dasyus were called dasyuhatya (slaughter of the dasyus) this is repeatedly mentioned in the Rig Veda.
Read the following to know more on this same subject
Aryan by Birth - Upper Caste Fair Skin NORTH Indian (Brahmin, Kshatriyas & Vaisyas)
Dravidian by Birth - Lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes)
It is a very common and well known fact that across the globe White people feel that they are superior and enslave black people. That is the case in Africa and America too. Even in India even though we Indians had very old civilization then the British. The British people who came here for TRADE enslaved Indians. Same thing happened in Ancient India. Even though Dravidians had a OLDER Civilization, Aryans made them as Sudhras claiming white people are superior and black people are inferior.
People living in Indian Sub-continent who are ALL fair in complexion have mostly Steppe land R1A1 genes in their DNA these people are basically Aryan. More than caste it is the Skin color which decides whether someone is Aryan or Dravidians. People living in Indian Sub-continent who are Dark in complexion have mostly South Asian Hunter Gatherer genes in their DNA these people are Dravidian [Tamils] basically.
Tamils means all Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) lived/living across Indian sub - continent. Even today, you can see dark skinned and pale dark-skinned people living across India in all places, they were all Tamils only in ancient India. "Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission panel" says, Indian Vedic philosophy lead to social inequality and caste system, All these happened because of Brahmins, Upanishads, Manusrmiti, and epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana...” the commission said in its July 2020 report, which the BJP government formally accepted.
The panel report also says that people belonging to Dravidian race resided in North India once upon a time. “Many foreign invaders such as ARYANS, Persians, Greeks, Huns, Turks, Mongolians, Europeans etc came and fought against local people. The rulers who won the war developed relations with local women and consequently emerged mixed races”
About Kasthriyas, who ever had the courage and willpower they conquered the land [Still it is very difficult for a Sudhra to achieve this], for them even if they are from lower caste, Brhamins did NOT had any choice. So, Brahmins accepted who ever won the war as Kasthriyas except Muslim. Kasthriya Kings always married fair and good looking girls mostly. So, Kasthriyas community have a mix of Upper caste and lower caste DNAs in them.
The ancient text Manusmriti designate the Shudra as Peasants and Artisans i.e., Farmers and All Craftsman, Shudra is NOT to mean slaves.
Read the following facts about DNA Studies.
Why R1A1 DNA originates in EUROPE, but not in India. why it is it not found or too less in percentage among South Indian people ?
Why M haplogroups DNA is not found in Upper caste Aryans or North Indians ? If found why so less ?
If you have read Vedas there are lots and lots of mention about Horses, then why HORSES are not native to INDIA ?
If Aryans lived in India 5,000 years back means, then why there were NO Horse seals in Harappan IVC sites ?
Why copper hoard culture found only with Aryans, but not with Dravidians ?
Why antenna swords found in Sinauli - India which belongs to BMAC - Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex ?
Haplo M is found among 60% of modern day Indians. It is in every person from south. But here’s the main catch ! It’s only found in depressed classes of northern and tribal peoples of northern India. But, almost to zero to 1-4% among Higher caste Aryans or North Indians.
Just like R1A1 not found in south in the same way south’s M groups are not found among R1A1 peoples of north.
So, it is proved beyond doubt that "ALL upper caste Fair Skin North Indians are ALL ARYANS, and all lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) are all Dravidians"
Delusional nazi Mythologist
You're a low IQ rascist clown
Ok did I miss the part that states or showed the origins of the word?
Maybe you did.
"Noble" in sanscrit and persian.
@Jon Dau you sure said a whole lot of stuff.
so here's where you're wrong: Aryan means noble, not in the sense that "it was a word intended as the persian version of french word"
but in the sense that "we see this word in persian and use a word we know of you describe it"
they have a similar meaning but originated separately.
in simple maths terms it would mean
"Aryan = Noble" is incorrect.
"Aryan ~ Noble" is correct.
None of the responses answered my question if it's from Persia and written in sanskrit then Persia is not the origin sanskrit is older then Persia
@@tcharessemaatgaines3927 jesus christ read the video description it is very clear
So some mysterious people from central Asia is the only explanation they got? Not good enough sounds like smoke and mirrors to me origins please mysterious people is not an answer if you are going to call it origins. PERIOD
I'm just here for the comments
The thing with the term "invasion" is that due to the sheer numbers of modern populations what we think of as invasions are dramatically different from what they would have been back 4000 years ago.
What seems to be agreed upon in this is that groups of people from modern day Iran came down into modern day India. Due to the numbers of humans back then it certainly wasn't some systematic thing where one great nation conquered another, but when tribes move into new areas archeology shows us that usually one group beats up the other and then those who survive any conflict that occured merge together.
We also know that the chariot is a weapon of war back in ancient times and it only appears in india after this aryan migration.
Point being, during this migration there was likely conflict between the settled culture and the migratory one after which the two peoples became one. Now is this an "invasion" in the way we think of the term today? no, probably not, but in a historical context of a few tribes warring over territory then maybe it was.
True, Britishers were the real loots.
British, Germans and other Nordic peoples are the real ARYANS. Others like Romas and Jews are eternal enemy of the ARYAN.
Indians are mixed with DRAVIDIANS and therefore a savage race, should be subservient to the WHITE, NORDIC ARYAN HERRENRASSE.
Talent, abilities and hard work are irrelevant.
Show evidence then....IVC going out was purely due to geographic reasons....you want to self satisy your ego like Adolf back in the 1940s only to get bashed in the face
@@charumohanthere were already chariots in India mate look up recent excavations
ANY ONE WHO REALLY believes in proto-indoeuropean language and aryan invasion/migration theory, pls watch these videos and tell me in reply what you think about all that shown in these videos--
1)
Hinduism and Judaism - Shared Roots Different Branches? , this video is one example which debunks the aryan invaison/migration theory)
2)The Rigveda Chronology And The Indo European Homeland | Dr Aleksandr Semenenko
3) Semenenko A.A. Shield Agrument of the Indo European Dispersal out of India
4)The Tarimian Trace of the Indo European Dispersal | Dr Aleksandr Semenenko(this tells about the connection with the tarim basin mummies in china)
Tamilnadu, Andra,karnataka, keralla, and orisa have more archeological structural remains to excavation. Tamilnadu found another archeological mount that dated back 3400 old.and goes on and on.another 150 archeological mounts needed to be excavation. Most probably megalithic sites 15000 years old sites.needed to be excavate,one of those one kilometer long caste in pottpannaikottai.
Migration of Indo-Europeans entirely replaced the population in Britain. But definitely not conquest!
Definitely not
Genetic studies do not confirm "replacement"...
@@kmaher1424 yeah, what those genetic studies confirm is that Aryan peoples mixed with the native population, Western Hunter Gatherers. That WHG's had blue eyes and slightly darker skin (think Cheddar man) and Aryans originally had Brown to Grey eyes (which is why ethnic Aryans have Green to Blue eyes) with blonde or red hair.
Not entirely replaced. Less than 50%, genetically.
@@augustuscaesar8287 the group that later refered to themselves as Aryans, is not the same group as the Yamnaya. They're a later group also descended from the Yamnaya, but a seperate group from those who went west...this group went east, after having split long before.
brilliant video directs us to understand the path to the reality
Congratulations for the brilliant presentation
I was listening, but the reference of Romilla Thapar destabilized my thought process. Whatever, you have given a sketch of Arayans with alternative hypothesis and this makes an interesting piece.
Why no mention of Helena Blavatsky?
Why no mention of the astrological term Arien?
What do you mean?
@@ratgenerationx2946 Hitler fallowed Blavatskys' ideology and mythology.
And Arian is the term used for people born under the sign of Aries.
Now I understand when it is said "Knowledge shall increase in the last days" Thanks to this technology. There is no going back.
That "knowledge" doesn't work in your favor.......you guys got everything wrong.
@@navidvarzeghani2789 Who are "you guys" Navid?
@@musaka2022 haha.....you would want me to say huhn?
Count one and one together, i trust that you are more than capable of that.
@@navidvarzeghani2789 Should have expected a weird answer from an Iranian
@@navidvarzeghani2789 haha.....
Thank you , was very Educational!
Very interesting thank you
He never explains the caste system that was brought about the same time.
(he doesnt explain the prevalence of blue eyed personages of Dynastic histories either, (from India to Persia to Egypt etc) considering blue eyes was strictly a PIE trait emerging from the Black Sea about 6-8000 years bpe. interesting the information he neglects, its almost as if theres a narrative or an agenda afoot.
So what? That's for a different video
@@tewekdenahom485 So what...? You serious or a Troll? Information is invalid if it is skewed... Kinda like Government Statistics.
@@NegativeBodhiImage I thought that blue eyes was a trait first seen in the weird dark skinned Western hunter gatherers. The trait seems to been selected for as current European genomes have just a trace of the old hunter gatherers left.
VIN RUSSO. I was thinking the same thing. Where does the Caste System come from. And other ideas of people who come from the upper classes that they are superior to people who are the same ethnicity. Did these ideas come from Ayranism
Perhaps Aryans were the friends we made along the way.
Why do you give a year as say 1746 ce. What does the ce mean
Common era, now generally used.
AD, Ante Domini meaning the year of the lord is replaced by CE (Common era) Common era
@@Prasannakumar-yk7bf why did they replace it?
@@Tigerfire75 Because it has a religious connotation (Christian)
@Prasannakumar-yk7bf first they should then stop using the Gregorian calendar too since that has a religious connotation. Second basically everyone is religious even atheists follow their beliefs religiously. Last to call it common Era is bold since most people follow their own calendars depending where they are from and we shouldn't force our beliefs on them.
Thanks for this look back into history!
History is being re-written to accomodate American Imperial Ideology of egalitarianism. Aryan meant both "noble" and ethnicity. Its preposterous to believe the learned British were racist but the war like ancient Aryans were color blind Americans, that somehow paradoxically established the caste system. Indians, up to this day, are very ethnocentric and racist. When it is pointed out that the narratives of history are established to serve political objectives the present is no exception, and in the present, it is American ideology that is dominant. Thank America too, for flooding Europe with immigrants, under the cover of UN refugee programs.
Here comes the white supremacist who claims himself as aryan aka indian and persian.
Any Indian opposing this colonial bs becomes rucist LOL.
Good point. One need not be an Indologist to notice India's stratification is based on color, and this system has roots in Vedic times, pointing to Aryan hostility to darker skin peoples. No amount of diversity celebration can really, as it were, ignore the Elephant in the room. We have gone full circle: from the British attempts to justify it, to modern attempts to deny it.
@@MrResearcher122
That stratification was created by Europeans aka brits.
Roots in Vedic times? yeah you people have been trying to put the blame on indian people for ever. Which you people failed to prove.
Yes Aryan migration was truth nobody should deny that
@@MrResearcher122 wow,
Modern day historical revisionism. The Aryan invasion is not a "theory" and is written of in old Indian texts and understood by Northern Indians to this day.
I'm a Hindu and a North Indian, Which texts are you referring to? Vedas?
If so then I'd like to tell you that the Aryan tribes fought the people called "Dasyus/Dasa" and Micheal witzel and many other scholars have said that these were the North Iranian tribes.
And Aryan invasion theory is debunked, The correct theory is "Indo Aryan migration theory", IAMT/AMT for short.
@@KaiserOfAryas then why does Geneology match up with this "debunked myth" lmfao cope mate cope
@@ryanparker4996 Geneology supports Aryan migration theory, Not Aryan invasion. The heck are you even talking about? And the best way to support the invasion theory is to give archeological evidences, Which you failed to do so.
The academia has discarded AIT long ago, You don't seem to have knowledge about it though
@@KaiserOfAryas Aryans brought horses to India. The original invaders buried their horses when they died. Look it up.
@@ryanparker4996 We had horses even before that. we have drawings of horses in caves which are older than ur entire races
Brilliant video!
Interesting and well presented.
By the way, and with respect, Bayreuth is pronounced Buyroyt. Thank you.
I'm a proud indo-aryan Hindu following Aryan religion Hinduism and praying in Aryan language Sanskrit hymns.
🙂🙂🙂🙂
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 then what it is?
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 Hinduism is worlds first religion.
Our Indian word for religion is 'Dharma'.
Actual name of Hinduism is 'sanatana dharma'.
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 you are funny😁
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 you better go to nityananda island and preach your stupid ideology there😁😁
@@rebelxyz2077 the literal meaning for "Dharma" is Duty". Hinduism is not a religion it's Dharma. The literal meaning for "Religion" in sanskrit or Hindi is "Pant".
At first I might agree, if it wasn't for knowing and understanding historical patterns. The Turks and the Mongols that arrived during the Middle Ages conquered Central Asia and India. They conquered each other in East Asia, pushing each other. So why would the Arians not have done the same, if that is the logical historical pattern? I disagree with you, because what you say is not logical, but rather sounds politically correct. Not historically sound.
That's correct- and this happened _all over_ . Egypt is *another* good example- at various times it's been conquered by Southern Europeans, Greeks, Central/Northern Europeans, Arabs, Romans, Persians, (and even more ancient Hittites and Hyksos).
India, for itself, has kind of a peculiar geography, so that no big world empires ever came out of India, however India is geographically amenable to being conquered.
From 10,000 BC and even before then, the history of the world is a history of people going to and conquering other places.
Even when it was the tribe across the valley, if they had more grain in their silo, "let's go attack them and kill them and take their grain".
you should check out robert sepehr, he has it right when it comes to aryans without the politicaly correct bs
@@user-pf4tn2rl9n Yes, only South Indian Dravidian "archaeology" rejects it.
@@user-pf4tn2rl9n So becoz some South Hindu said it's not true, it isn't??
Is this “historian” too political?
Yersenia pestis is indigenous to the steppe, first seen around 2-3k y bc. I’m sure it played some part in finishing off starving villagers..
Germs move faster than horses.
Very nice explanation.
Was looking forward to an insightful doc on the history and development of the subcontinent, instead what I got was a sophmoric lecture, (parental kind), about how I shouldn't confuse " Aryan" with "white supremacists," when talking about south Asia....yeah no shit, thanks for the waste of time.
@ABHISHEK RAJU I have no issues with any theories of any variety as long as they're plausible, my issue with the video is that it spends 3/4 of the time telling us that Aryans are not the same as German Nazis which anyone with half-a-brain knows. It's false advertising and the video should have been entitled, "Why you shouldn't confuse Aryan with white supremacists."
@ABHISHEK RAJU Thanks, I will also keep in mind that this is an issue that people feel strongly about
a LOT of people need to hear that though.
@@suzandouglass5241 go sip your Starbucks coffee Suzan and keep your nose out of things you will never be able to compute.
@@suzandouglass5241 it's not even worth debating someone like you.
I'm very disappointed in author of this video. He's definatly trying to be as politically correct as possible....shame.
Completely missing the fact that OTHER ÆRYAN groups spread to the north 🤦♂️
@@VikingMuayThai WE WUZ KANGS N SHEEYIT, DEM ARYANS WUZ WYTE
Very interesting.
Aryana = Ancient Afghanistan 5,000 years ago, centered around the city of Balkh.
خسته نباشی آریانا شد آریایی؟ 😂 خودت هم میدونی آریایی اصیل ایرانی ها هستند نه پشتون های طالبانی
Aryana = Aryaiee YES!!@@user-ux2dk4ec4o
As somebody who has in-depth and scholarly knowledge of this subject, I take my hat off to the producers of this video for its very high quality of contents- simply not just one of, but the best presentation of the subject so admirably condensed into such a short time of the video. Thank you and very well done!
Indo iranians were nordic looking
@@jasrajsandhu1658 the relics don't say so
@@azeeramon what relics? The sanskreeet? I am using raw genetics to say that they looked nordic, their genetic composition was entirely identical to northern europeans and they had a drift that went in the nw euro cline
@@jasrajsandhu1658 ancient texts, artifacts and paintings from modern day iran and Afghanistan.
Genes? who gave you the samples? 💀 Where did you get them? And how do you know who they were and what they called themselves? Did they talk back?
@@azeeramon got them from g25 vahaduo, you don't know what that is because you have to rely on "artifact" for your own information, LMAO, also look up the new science artical regarding the fatyanovo, hahahahahahahaha they are literally grouped with modern northern europeans hahahahahahahahah
No indo european❌ no erupean❌ I am is arian✔ I am is asian✔ I am hendo iranian✔.
Not Hendo
Indo Aryan
You ain't an Aryan
Just because you Persian
Aryan is a race
Most Persians aren't Aryans neither white
11:40 isn't that a Sumerian musical instrument?
I absolutely am burning my stomach muscles from your history on them largely due to my ignorance believing they qere as ancient Egypt, babylon or something and to learn from 1 of the most hilarious yet truly honest historians I've ran across yet
By the time any group had invented writing they each knew metallurgy, animal breeding, farming architecture and all had an incredible record of the movements of the planets, stars & repeating events like what we know as Halley’s Comet. They weren’t anything like “primitive”.
Beautifully done! Actual history that's not suffocated or based on mythology.
No mention of the R1A haplogroup though?
Once Indus valley script is deciphered, we'd be able to tell for certain what happened. Until then it's just speculation, some more probable than others.
True this is the best theory on here. Everything else is just ppl fighting for their side their affiliation
Pronunciations: Mleccha [mleːtt͡ʃʰə]. Bayreuth: [baɪ̯ˈrɔʏt].
Thank you very much for the great interpretation of ARYAN .
Dr BB Lal who was most important archeologist of Indus Valley civilization concluded that Indus Valley civilization is Vedic civilization.
Please provide his paper work
Read his Book Who were the Vedic people?
There is no doubt
@@profrajeshmaurya5078 ..... indian historians are notorious for cooking bogus stories.
The language and religion of IVC people has no correlation with vedic Hinduism
History hurts my feeling so lets just change it to make me feel better. A summary of this video
Its pathetic. History is all a big racist controversy whilst attempting to advance a racist theory. I unsubbed. I hear enough of this low minded indoctrination in university; I certainly dont care for it in my spare time.
That's mity white of you.
WTF? What racist theory is being advanced here? Maybe you should unsub from university.
@@mzeewatk846 and to say that is *mighty racist of you......be careful your facade is slipping.
@@chanimarie6753 your exactly right
Well there is the Genetic and Linguistic research if you are keen on researching further
That they won't touch. All they would do is speak off the head with colonial era evidences. Expect nothing from colonial conservatists. This is what you will get because if they see some promise or superiority in a foreign civilization to their own - that disturbs and destroys there own made up foundation on which they proudly stand. From there their world would begin to crumble hence they are holding onto the created nonsense.
A visit today, to modern Iran, will show you, that the population is sharply divided into two cultural groups: One which bare all the physical attributes of Central Europeans, and the other, which shares physical attributes more with the populations in Pakistan, and India. Afghans are no different: Those who's ethnic heritage is from Iran, Tajikistan, Bactria, and Uzbekistan, are of lighter complexion, and bare a different culture. The Afgan-Pashtu of the South-East, are of a darker race, and bare the deeply religious cultures, customs, and mentality of their Pashtu cousins of Pakistan.
Uzbeks are a Turkic race they very differwnt than other Afghan races and Tajiks and Pashtuns are genetic cousins who look similar only difference is their language and culture and only the Pashtuns in Pakistan share similarity with the Afghan Pashtuns while the other Pakistani ethnic groups share no similarity.
Aryans were Pashtun in origin, and they spoke fluent Rigvedic.
@@parjanyashukla176 Pashtoon and Hindko are very close to Vedic sanskrit ( if you remove islamist corruption )
@@parjanyashukla176NOPE PASHTUNS ARE IRANIC MIXED WITH INDO-ARYANS WHEN THEY BECAME BUDDHIST
Then you've probably dreamt of visiting it lol. Or maybe too childish to see the reality
It’s also equally amazing how much there is to know….
I am an Aryan I have colored eyes and blonde hair and was born in Armenia more earlier Anatolia
Same with the Spaniards. I have cousins from Spain with blue eyes or green. Bet you have nice eyes..Its all mixed blood and how you interpret things..
2:40
@dash Rex the R1b DNA is about 30-35% of Armenians actually to some extent or another and R1b and R1a are the aryan bloodlines which migrated from Anatolia/Eastern Europe to India and Western Europe later America
@dash Rex It's not specific only to Indo- Iranian..that's the point. Ireland, Ares...etc.
Blonde hair most likely cones from the Baltic but coloured eyes maybe southern Russia and the steppe, but do you have the character of the arya, do follow izzat ?
The brilliant video directs us to understand the path of reality
I never found anywhere in Veda's about mention of Harrapan civilisations or similar urban development if Veda's are so old?
They talk about cities.
How do you consolidate your proposals with the kurgan theory? And same step nomads spreading to Europe??
Those theories aren't legit
@@EresirThe1st send me the link to the scientific papers please!
@@EresirThe1st I don’t check CZcams for history! I read scientific papers!
@@EresirThe1st the links do not answer any real question, you cherry!
Kurgan theory is deprecated.
Your obsession with race has unfortunately clouded your work. You spent the entire video doing that of which you claim to denounce. Please try to remove your saw bias and speak the truth. History is so sickeningly political.
Even if "World Encyclopedia" isn't billed as some top notch academic resource, this article only goes two minutes in before the loaded language crop up. "Elitist" and "racist", outside a direct context to the terms themselves, have absolutely zero business in defining something. Utterly blatant, embarrassing attempts to sway the reader to their "correct" opinion. Not gonna work on me and the point where I check out of this video altogether.
All iranains and Indians are aryans by genetics. However, the ancient aryans did look more like modern russians and eastern europeans do today. And they mixed with dark skinned natives In those regions.
Were is Aryan native place?Which language ,is spoken?
0:39
I wish I had the funds to donate to your GoFund Me, instead I leave your playlists open in a another window and it plays day and night for ad revenue. If anyone else cant donate, this is another way to help in a small way. I check your community page constantly for updates to your health, every time hoping to see that you will be on the mend and ready to get back to your family and creating the content you (and we) love. Sending you and your family all my love and positivity.
Who does not love Wagner? One must be deaf to not admire this absolute genius.
@CHR1ST0N1A 5 Nietzsche loved Wagner until Parsifal.
I love you listen to Wagner while I imagine Hitler killing himself and his hideous family
That's like loving a woman based solely on the sound of her voice on the radio.
• Islamic texts also say the Jinn tribes of Arabia had Black skin and weren't considered to be Human or related to Adam since thy had horns + weird feet + out of human shape features.
@@user-ud7ei6zv7i
Jinn is Arabic.
It might've even arrived from the word "Chin" (China) since Arabs can't pronounce the letter CH.
But the Muslims mostly say the Jinns were Black skinned and tall.
@@user-ud7ei6zv7i
Here's some people with actual horns (watch the second half of the video):
czcams.com/video/mImd6fr8VpA/video.html
And here's sme people with Jinn feet:
czcams.com/video/8hwHFhjnG9U/video.html
@@user-ud7ei6zv7i
Some parts are metaphors but the whole thing isn't.
Devils (people/tribes with horns + weird feet + tail) did exist. They're recorded in almost every ancient text all over the world. Such people who have a crazy culture of self harm do exist and were even many more before the modern world.
@@user-ud7ei6zv7i
Devil tribes are recorded in every single culture + They're almost in every religious book (Avesta - Torah - Bible - Quran and...) + The previous generations (our grand parents) used to claim they've seen them + There are people with actual horns and weird feet present on our planet with their videos on CZcams!They had to exist.
Banalinga stone looks suspiciously like odin statue i wonder why?
Artifacts they have found in the excavations suggest they were Vedic people. Artifacts such as Shivlinga, alter for god, yoga terracotta figures, and a few others.
There is no reference to Saraswati River which may have caused the abandonment of big cities because of its drying up... Rakhigarhi is a site of an ancient city presently in the state of Haryana in India , doesn't lie on the indus or Sindhu river and hence role of the Saraswati River is to be studied further
this video guy is just a guy out there, not a true expert or anything like that. just has strong opinions and does some reading and puts out opinions. rather obviously.
Saraswathi is not present-day Indus or ghagra or hajra. It is Helmand in Afghanistan . Something Hindutva types are loath to accept
@@velamuranand8356the description doesn't match with what was written in the Vedas. Saraswati river was said to be massive and drain in the ocean. The river of Afghanistan doesn't match any of the description.
@velamuranand8356 afghanistan was a part of india anyway
European scientists in 18-19c. concluded that people of Caucasus mountains are most pure, strong and beautiful race of people, so white race probably originated there. So white race was called Caucasian. Ironically people of Caucasus also distinguished not only by race but as only non-Aryan ethnicities in huge Indo-European ocean, between Slavs and Iranians
Caucazian is most beatiful and inteligent peoples in Earth
It had nothing to do with purity or beauty. They were obsessed with skull shapes and found that the skull shape they most closely identified with the white race was that most typified by people living in the Caucasus region. Of course today we understand that that is pure nonsense.
@@brucetucker4847 The Caucasus as the origin of humanity and the peak of beauty
In the eighteenth century, the prevalent view among European scholars was that the human species had its origin in the region of the Caucasus Mountains.[22] This view was based upon the Caucasus being the location for the purported landing point of Noah's Ark - from whom the Bible states that humanity is descended - and the location for the suffering of Prometheus, who in Hesiod's myth had crafted humankind from clay.[22]
In addition, the most beautiful humans were reputed by Europeans to be the stereotypical "Circassian beauties" and the Georgian people; both Georgia and Circassia are in the Caucasus region.[23][22] The "Circassian beauty" stereotype had its roots in the Middle Ages, while the reputation for the attractiveness of the Georgian people was developed by early modern travellers to the region such as Jean Chardin.[22][24]
Christoph Meiners' 1785 treatise The Outline of History of Mankind was the first work to use the term Caucasian (Kaukasisch) in its wider racial sense. (click on image for English translation of the text)
The term Caucasian as a racial category was first introduced in the 1780s by members of the Göttingen School of History - notably Christoph Meiners in 1785 and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795-it had originally referred in a narrow sense to the native inhabitants of the Caucasus region.[25]
In his The Outline of History of Mankind (1785), the German philosopher Christoph Meiners first used the concept of a "Caucasian" (Kaukasisch) race in its wider racial sense. Meiners' term was given wider circulation in the 1790s by many people. Meiners imagined that the Caucasian race encompassed all of the ancient and most of the modern native populations of Europe, the aboriginal inhabitants of West Asia (including the Phoenicians, Hebrews and Arabs), the autochthones of Northern Africa (Berbers, Egyptians, Abyssinians and neighboring groups), the Indians, and the ancient Guanches.[36]
It was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a colleague of Meiners', who later came to be considered one of the founders of the discipline of anthropology, who gave the term a wider audience, by grounding it in the new methods of craniometry and Linnean taxonomy.[37] Blumenbach did not credit Meiners with his taxonomy, although his justification clearly points to Meiners' aesthetic viewpoint of Caucasus origins.[38] In contrast to Meiners, however, Blumenbach was a monogenist-he considered all humans to have a shared origin and to be a single species. Blumenbach, like Meiners, did rank his Caucasian grouping higher than other groups in terms of mental faculties or potential for achievement[37] despite pointing out that the transition from one race to another is so gradual that the distinctions between the races presented by him are "very arbitrary".
-----------------
I think it is clear that my words "they thought so.. " is backed by their (leading racologists of time) own words (NOT mine - it would be arrogant)
European scientists - rather *colonial scientists* did everything to please their masters and twisted entire world history. Now that Out of India theory among others backed by science are coming out, academia has already started accepting every other probability there is and come to a distinguished conclusion through proper evidence, research, discussions and debates. *All this they do now by first learning ancient languages - going to the subcontinent, dwelling deep into the works of the ancient world, archaeological sites, pottery etc. and then come to a conclusion which colonial historians were extremely feeble at (not generalizing but in plural).*
*Aryan meant "Noble" in Sanskrutam/ Sanskrit - All Humans whom were highly moral, simple, had jnyana (knowledge and wisdom) and walked the right path throughout her/his life that became beneficial for all was called an "Arya" or "Arya Purush".* As per Sanatana Dharmik scriptures there is *no rigid class system and people could align themselves to their professions as they liked and hence called "Varnashrama Dharma" - Varna - Ashrama - Dharma -> Duty as per job or leaning in material life. Moreover the Brahmins/Brahmanas were supposed to live extremely simple (basically destitute), ought to perform prayers for oneself and society and provide free education. Kshatriyas were spiritually enhanced to the level they used to "protect Dharma" , Vaishyas (Merchant/Business class) providing employment opportunities and Shudras were "Service men/women" - Those whom served or worked just like Engineers, Skilled workers, Architects, Designers, Manufacturers etc. These virtues and values were practiced throughout till the 17th - 18th Centuries (pre - colonial era) during the final periods of the Mughal Empire in India. This fact is attested by the Mughals themselves in their Book : *Fatawa - E - Alamgiri* written by Naqshbandi scholars on the lives and culture of Indian society in Aurangzeb's period (pre - Maratha era).* The description is very clear. Hence there was economical disparity based differences in social status for over the period of colonial rule as this book of the Mughals was used by the then colonials to target the social fabric of the country with a motive to bend it to their own will. For the most part the colonial experiment was successful and till date Indians identify more with the west than with their culture and themselves.
Yeah! they called themselves noble persons
You are re-sighting New English History.
Aryan, Nword, Indiër, Multiracial, Mohren, Aboriginals... Are the same damn words.
@@lordvonmanor6915 Nothing has been "re - sighted" and West cannot write the history of the world. This is the mistake your ancestors had done and your contemporaries continue to do. In case you are a scholar in Sanskrit (which I assume you are not), one would understand that the word "Arya" has been used to mention a noble man be it a carpenter, sculptor, ship builder etc. Unfortunately your academia is so drunk with it's own definitions and pre - conceived notions damn it that you feel yourself to possess a superior authority over Sanskrit texts without having even gotten a degree lest kept knowledge of a word in Sanskrit. Twisted people peddling to be "scholars" all around. By the way read the research papers of Israeli researcher like Dr. David Dean Schulman among others and you will understand *how many misunderstandings have been caused due to mistranslations into the English text.* Simply don't keep whining "English English British British..." *The sun sat on the British empire almost a century back - wake up and grow up.
@@TheB657 The only people saying that is North Amerikans.
All you have to do is open a Indo Dictionary in any Indo language including Sanskrit and you'll see it means Vegetarian.
Warm regards
@@TheB657 Yeah and the West told you the word Black means People of Afrikan descent when fact is it comes from the word Svartr and is a reference to domesticated NWords of Negerij Tabahan.
English is a Indo language based on Low Holländisch-Deutsch.
You should learn it and stop making up word definitions.
Stop making up definitions!
Could you just drop the “CE” after every date…I’m sure I can tell from the photos we aren’t talking ancient history🙄
I think the latest theory for the Harappan decline was earthquake that changed the course of the Sindhu river. The river dried up, with water diverted to the Ganges and Indus. That is why the Ganges is the holy river. It was the river that was enhanced/created when the Sindhu died. It gave the people life who thought they had lost everything.
@Khushal Singh Maurya I think the Saraswati and the Shindu are the same (extinct) river.
Saraswati river is the one that disappeared from human vision .. It said to hav gone underground after an earthquake .. created a horrible drought ... Ganges is a man made canal of water brought down after connecting multiple Himalayan water channels .. brain child of ancient king Bhagiratha
That's not Sindhu..
that's saraswathi..
Recent findings suggests it dried up 4000-4500 years ago.
but in Vedas it was mentioned."saraswathi river is flowing full fledge".
That ancient script that looks Arabic, is actually old Persian Avesta script, and it was written before there ever was Arabic script.
The Indo Aryans arrived in India in 1500bc long after ,(400years) the IVC declined and disappeared in 1900bc. The Indo Aryans were not to know and appreciate the fact that an indigenous advanced and sophisticated urban civilization with wide spread international trade links existed in the area for over a 1000 years before their arrival 400 years later.
I just wanna say that I’m Norwegian and German and I’m very happy to see someone clearing up the ignorance and confusion. Thank you.
Very well explained. It makes sense.
Wonderful 😂❤ thanks so much good luck and best wishes
Sirus London
Super video
It looks like your political correctness has prejudiced your views of the Aryan migration into northern India. Recent DNA studies/evidence confirms it.
I think you did a good job here, funny part is indians still believe sanskrit originated in india and that somewhere north were a clan of blue and green eyed, blonde haired lot of aryans who gave culture to the dark peoples. Yet they still cannot pinpoint where cast system or chariots and horses came from.
😊😊
There is cave painting of horses in India, which is about 40000 years old.
@@mmMstatus prolly donkeys.
If Sanskrit came to India from Iran or other countries then why there no Sanskrit used anywhere except India? There are not even traces of it outside India. The whole Aryan Dravidian theory is political, created by British.
@@yashpednekar331r u from Goa?
@@mmMstatusyes bhai
Thank you for this true history.
I appreciate this video so very much!!
what about the Mitanni Kingdom in northern Syria, the place where the oldest Vedic inscriptions were found. So I think the Mitanni peoples migrated to India bringing Vedic cultures.