the camera wasnt in any way attached to the engine or dyno cart, BUT space limitations mean it was quite close to the engine and the induction pulses were shaking it around, will try harder next time!
well, thank goodness this clip supports not just my results but others from years of tried and true tests. the #1 is the angle of the port in any direction to the back of the valve, #2 is how trumpet / intake port length rocks the TQ curve and 4:2:1 verses 4:1 exhaust tubes do not make a massive difference till 4:1 tube length matches calculated peak RPM / BHP. Carb throat sizing obviously changes the result
Thanks Graham. The audio on this one is much better! Much appreciated 👌 keep up the good work
I turned it up to the max + 400%
Come on boys ! Let’s make some more noise ! 😆🙌🏼
Should probably mount the camera on something that isn’t affected by the motor.
But we appreciate the efforts regardless.
the camera wasnt in any way attached to the engine or dyno cart, BUT space limitations mean it was quite close to the engine and the induction pulses were shaking it around, will try harder next time!
@@PenguinMotors
I figured that too after looking at the wideshots. Regardless, thanks!
well, thank goodness this clip supports not just my results but others from years of tried and true tests. the #1 is the angle of the port in any direction to the back of the valve, #2 is how trumpet / intake port length rocks the TQ curve and 4:2:1 verses 4:1 exhaust tubes do not make a massive difference till 4:1 tube length matches calculated peak RPM / BHP. Carb throat sizing obviously changes the result
I would have liked to have a set of 40mm Mikunis given that engine's specs