The Great Debate: PARALLEL REALITIES (OFFICIAL) - (Part 2/2)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 02. 2014
  • Link to Part 1: • The Great Debate: PARA...
    Origins Project is pleased to present a top-notch discussion of the nature of the universe, the possibilities of a multiverse, and exciting discoveries in fundamental physics. Join Nobel Laureates Frank Wilczek, David Gross, and Brian Schmidt, as well as esteemed scientists Wendy Freedman, Maria Spiropulu, and Lawrence Krauss for an out-of-this-world conversation.
    We live in one universe. Is it unique? Is it required? How can we find out? These issues touch on the forefront of particles physics and cosmology, from the Large Hadron Collider to the edges of the visible Universe. This panel will bring together the leading scientists and thinkers working at both these frontiers to discuss how we can probe the fundamental fabric of reality.
    Saturday, February 1, 2014 - 7:00pm
    Video by Black Chalk Productions.

Komentáře • 231

  • @kennethflorek8532
    @kennethflorek8532 Před 8 lety +10

    In watching 2 hours in 2 parts, you might expect to find out something about parallel universes, considering the title "parallel realities." There is nothing about that other than bringing up the terminology. It was still enjoyable to see these notables of science and hear their presentations.

  • @mrsportysomil
    @mrsportysomil Před 4 lety +13

    "Respect your dog."
    Lol what an absolutely perfect conclusion.

  • @TipoQueTocaelPiano
    @TipoQueTocaelPiano Před 8 lety +22

    Can you imagine you go to the bar and instead of finding the typical bunch of grandpas playing dominos you found these guys having fun about their Hadron Colider, the Higgs boson, the expansion of the Universe...That World would be amazing.

    • @anudeeptoora
      @anudeeptoora Před 8 lety

      +Citriano Torres That would be awesome !

    • @gamesbok
      @gamesbok Před 8 lety +2

      +Citriano Torres Have you found the video of Richard Feynman and Fred Hoyle in a pub in Yorkshire?

    • @felizpierluisi680
      @felizpierluisi680 Před 7 lety

      el universo es uno, se creo y la energía q lo creo lo sigue haciendo

    • @gamesbok
      @gamesbok Před 7 lety

      feliz pierluisi,
      Oh, that's easy for you to say.

    • @shannonm.townsend1232
      @shannonm.townsend1232 Před 3 lety

      What kind of bars do you go to?

  • @stednark2217
    @stednark2217 Před 8 lety +8

    Thanks for the upload. I always feel privileged to be able to hear people who are at the very top of their respective fields speak.

  • @magicsqr3414
    @magicsqr3414 Před 9 lety +17

    Loved both parts, many thanks to the uploader (y)

  • @gilbertengler9064
    @gilbertengler9064 Před 5 lety

    Many thanks Kraus and all the members of the panel! Its just fantastic!!These discussions make me feel very happy!

  • @TerryRosen
    @TerryRosen Před 9 lety +8

    "[The Multiverse] smells of angels" is going on my bumper sticker

  • @miguelortiz61atgmail
    @miguelortiz61atgmail Před 8 lety +6

    The final message is: we don´t know much about the limits of this universe, and for all practical purposes, nothing about parallel universes, and much less about other dimensions, that what some call multiverse. Stay tuned for new scienticif discoveries. There might be some news in the future. Hopfully, our distinguised panelists and scientis will advance in their comprehension of these issues, our consumers and politicians won´t manage to screw up things and stop this wonderful journey-experiment on its tracks.

  • @enochianwolf
    @enochianwolf Před 9 lety +5

    This was engaging, informative and at times very funny. There really is no one better at leading a talk like this than Lawrence. I can say that I did learn a lot and I would have to say my favorite presentation was Frank's and the charts graphing Super Symmetry... very exciting stuff.

  • @bangdon12
    @bangdon12 Před 6 lety

    So glad they are willing to do this and hoping much more to come:)

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders Před 8 lety +1

    Bravo! These juggernauts tore the set down and have done science proud. 20/10.

  • @dramese
    @dramese Před 8 lety

    What an amazing panels!!

  • @pb4520
    @pb4520 Před 6 lety

    WOW thankyou for this !

  • @shrap8
    @shrap8 Před 9 lety

    Such a thought provoking lecture

  • @trashbash2001
    @trashbash2001 Před 10 lety +8

    lawrence you are my hero

  • @UmmadikTas
    @UmmadikTas Před 9 lety +11

    It's not fair being that intelligent and beautiful at the same time! I'm fucking done with this life.

    • @misterspiff659
      @misterspiff659 Před 8 lety +1

      Sigh. This subthread is the quality of mind and character of the average human being on the planet. So depressing.

    • @ivan-Croatian
      @ivan-Croatian Před 7 lety +4

      Yeah man. Krauss is a real hottie.

  • @charlesjackson9547
    @charlesjackson9547 Před 8 lety

    Excellent!!

  • @ruthdenova5984
    @ruthdenova5984 Před 3 lety

    Fascinating

  • @garryheywood1
    @garryheywood1 Před 5 lety +1

    I love these presentations, this is the food on which my mind feeds, but however much I gorge myself it always leaves me with a greater hunger than I had to begin with, does that make sense?

  • @milessodejana2754
    @milessodejana2754 Před 4 lety +4

    "Parallel Universe so far only benefitted Brian Greene" lol hahahahahah

  • @dr.satishsharma9794
    @dr.satishsharma9794 Před 3 lety

    Excellent..... thanks 🙏.

  • @legendwarrior85
    @legendwarrior85 Před 6 lety

    Enjoyed the debate. ..nice to see great minds having fun....and also these theorists are not all nerds like most think of them...

  • @dimap81
    @dimap81 Před 7 lety +1

    The very first question makes it clear that Wilczek is the only person who knows what "intuition" means, I am talking about his example with an expanding balloon. The rest just told mantras accepted by the community.

  • @tonylee8784
    @tonylee8784 Před 9 lety

    brilliant absolutely mind blowing although didn't understand most of it lol

  • @lamb998
    @lamb998 Před 10 lety

    actually on second thoughts what a good way to keep the audience listening and entertained

  • @applesoranges8015
    @applesoranges8015 Před 4 lety

    One of my favorite personal stories, was a man I was visiting quite often, mainly because he was a scientist / biologist and never believed in God. We talked often about Science, and often about religion. He told me he was never afraid to die, and by science, everything has a lifespan in which it returns to the earth from which it came, and thus is the process of the circle of life. Understandable, he had devoted 50 years of his life to his research, and although I would talk about Jesus and God randomly with him, he always shrugged away from the topic. I came back to the hospital a month later to investigate another patient, when I was told by a nurse that the Scientist wanted to speak with me.
    I went into his room, and when he saw me, his eyes flared up in desperation. He went on to tell me that two weeks ago, he had a stroke, and was dying. When he was dying he had a vision, in which he could see his own mother and father smiling at him, and behind them, and older man with a warm smile. He told me he recongnized the old man, to which I responded..... Uncle ?, Grandfather ?. He just looked at me, shook his head, and reponded with, Jesus, that he had a picture when he was just a boy in his room of Jesus, and it looked exactly similar to that picture
    I couldn't believe it. Since this man was not religious in any sense, and devoted his life to science, but for the first time he told me he was actually afraid of dying, and confront an entity which he spent his life trying to de-bunk. And it was the first time he asked me, still very hesitant, about the Bible, and the exact teachings of Jesus.

    • @applesoranges8015
      @applesoranges8015 Před 4 lety

      @krelfurnace The last words of a famous Satanist. "What have I done, there is something very wrong" - Anton LaVey (1930-1997), detailed his final moments just before his death. He was the Founder of the First Church of Satan, and author of The Satanic Bible. In his final moments, Anton comes to the terrible realization that he had allowed himself to be deceived by the Devil and now faces eternity in hell.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety +1

      Cool, his mental faculties had to completely and utterly fail him before he was able to believe the nonsense that is god. Smart man, shame the stroke messed that up.

  • @skycaptainv1
    @skycaptainv1 Před 10 lety

    Bravo ! ! "May the wind be at your backs ..."

  • @tomasotreasaigh111
    @tomasotreasaigh111 Před 3 lety +1

    Did anyone sense a weird undercurrent of tension or agitation?
    It was more noticeable in part 1 but it was like there was some row had happened just before they started the show and then the lights came on and they were all a little on edge...
    Did anyone else notice a strange akwardness?

    • @GnomonsLand
      @GnomonsLand Před 9 měsíci +1

      Just after 11:00, tense moment Maria looks away upset and then a couple of the other speakers proceed to cut her off/ talk over her.. I haven't finished watching but that's what I've noticed so far. I was wondering if anyone else noticed too

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 Před 3 lety

    This is the ways, experimental, found the things by itself , and takes more time’s to understand it

  • @craig-duncan
    @craig-duncan Před 10 lety +10

    Wonderful stuff! I always wondered what orgasmic felt like... Now I Know it's watching 5 scientists on stage while sitting in my sofa in my bathrobe sipping coffee.

  • @twstdelf
    @twstdelf Před 10 lety +1

    While this was definitely worthwhile, and it's always interesting to listen to these intelligent speakers, I was a little disappointed that there wasn't more on-topic discussion. What I thought was going to be a panel discussion on parallel universes and the science behind them unfortunately turned out to be more of a general science presentation.

    • @ianhaig6027
      @ianhaig6027 Před 10 lety

      Yep, the universe is a very on-topic discussion subject; and you could be more interesting?

  • @unclemunch
    @unclemunch Před 9 lety +2

    As Penny from "The Big Bang Theory" would say, "He has a Nobel Prize and he has a Nobel Prize and he has a Nobel Prize and Lawrence, you know a lot of guys with a Nobel Prize."

  • @cyber6sapien
    @cyber6sapien Před 7 lety

    Our consciousness shifts through various parallel universes throughout our life. Most people don't realize it because it happens so quickly. This phenomenon explains a lot of the strangeness we experience in our reality that we cannot explain. Hopefully, once we get a better understanding of consciousness, we will gain an understanding of parallel universes as well.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      There are no parallel universes and there is absolutely no weirdness in our experience it could explain. It is an effect of the Science community and the Woo community coming together to form grand unified bullshit theory and it started with super position and evolved into the nonsense that is the multiverse theory. Its literally impossible to exist. It would be unstable and instantly destroy itself

    • @cyber6sapien
      @cyber6sapien Před 3 lety

      @@seditt5146 LMFAO!! Ok Einstein.

  • @bajovato
    @bajovato Před 8 lety +2

    28:30 thru 30:23. It's about time SOMEONE freaking humbled Krauss's gargantuan ego (which is an objectively observable phenomenon in itself)! lol!

    • @tjdoss
      @tjdoss Před 8 lety +1

      Krauss would have attempted a rude comeback if he was talking to a TV anchor but he would have got his ass handed to him, if he tried against Dr.Gross

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 Před 2 lety

    Astrids can’t be ignored!

  • @zalon115
    @zalon115 Před 6 lety +1

    There is a reason to think there are parallel realities , it's called the principle of polarity and it is embedded into the nature of reality

  • @bytheseaaspirinshop801

    "Universe" means "everything". "Observable Universe" is the part of "everything" that we have discovered. If there is a "Parallel Universe" it is just a part of "everything" that we haven't seen yet.

  • @Garcia-elf
    @Garcia-elf Před 10 lety

    Good discussion

  • @andrewbaker943
    @andrewbaker943 Před 9 lety +3

    consider the universe (all of what is or could be, so as to differentiate from the cosmos being what we can observe) essentially existing analogous to a bubble either on the surface or within a boiling pot of water, who is doing the predictions and modeling? this would be a self-consistent, perpetual existence universe, without violating logic just that what we understand of reality indeed will have a violent end (when the bubble pops). it would be heat that ultimately caused the existence of such a universe (our big bang) all the while bringing into reality the laws of nature and time as well and could offer an elegant idea for what we observe in our expanding universe (bubble expanding in the pot). bad idea? worth exploring?

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 Před 2 lety

    Hi , the energies which produced by black holes, as they became cold, filling the gaps, between the star’s and planets, and surrounding, all the universes, as they became dark energies.

  • @peterpackiam
    @peterpackiam Před 10 lety

    'BRILLANCE ' IS JUST AN UNDERSTATEMENT ....CHEERS

  • @kirtooahmadinejad
    @kirtooahmadinejad Před 10 lety

    Damn it these people are awesome.

  • @Robustacap
    @Robustacap Před 4 lety

    My analogy is a frozen spot of dye in a glass of water, as it dilutes into the water the warmer it gets. To say what water or warming in this analogy are seemingly simple yet not.
    I also don't think of particles with wave like qualities, I think of bubbles. Our measure might show the totality of the bubble, a highest energy point of it, or the wave of the bubble. Maybe even just the part visible in our dimension, and it's just foam from scale to scale with middle scales with sapience/experience forming.

    • @Robustacap
      @Robustacap Před 4 lety

      the dye drop in the water seems more accurate in other ways than the old balloon one used to explain the expansion and every point being the middle.

  • @angeltraegerocana5238
    @angeltraegerocana5238 Před 3 lety

    El azar representado por imágenes es un método de inspiración para el artista psicoanalítico, el tarot es funcional siempre y cuando el cartomancista se conecte empática eh intelectualmente con el cliente, además de su educación imaginativa el tarot es un juego de psicoanálisis para la superación personal, no precisamente para predecir el futuro, sino para ahondar en los problemas de la persona, todas las cartas representan cosas similares, el misterio, el trabajo del hombre intuitivo es jugar con las imágenes y la palabra para jugar eh interpretar los problemas personales del cliente, eso es lo que hace a un buen mago terapeuta, que debe tener la iniciativa de estudiar no solo magia sino ciencia y psicoanálisis.

  •  Před 5 lety +1

    would it make sence to claim that gravity is hanging on to matter in a long string, and it must do that to be able to create planets-stars etc. And thats why we observe dark matter.

  • @nimehg5734
    @nimehg5734 Před 3 lety +2

    yeah we should fight parallel realities rather than among us😂

  • @jaffershurie862
    @jaffershurie862 Před 4 lety

    To make a full statement about the expansion of the universe we first need to know how much energy gets released from the dark energy and its negative pressure effect that beats the gravitational force, the rest is the detail.

    • @cahles6679
      @cahles6679 Před 2 lety +1

      Funny thing is that dark energy is not being diluted by the expansion of the universe, its concentration is directly proportional to the expansion. I think that they already know its output, because they predicted that the expansion will outrun the speed of light, and the expansion is caused by this dark energy. For me, they need to find the source of this dark energy( it may be by the dark matter or the vacuum itself is producing energy).

    • @jaffershurie862
      @jaffershurie862 Před 2 lety

      @@cahles6679 Everything is Nothing, and Nothing is Something, and it controls Everything.

  • @francissreckofabian01
    @francissreckofabian01 Před 5 lety

    How would proof of Parallel Universes benefit humanity? Excellent Science Fiction stories!

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      People said the same at the discovery of the Laser.... It's cool, but it has zero practical purposes. Needless to say the laser has been one of the largest world changing inventions in around 100 years and has not even reached its full potential yet.

  • @Analfracture
    @Analfracture Před 10 lety +5

    8:37 "We fucked the first paper." She did say that right?

  • @fashionablelifestyle4120

    For there to be one, there needs to be two, one can’t exist without the other. Anything real has an opposite to it, even our universe. LIFE IS TIME AND TIME IS LIFE Warmest greetings to all Given my lack in getting my poetry across without there being any form of me being seen as anything than trying to get your opinion has led me to keep most opinions to self, resulting in this current action of having the faith IN asking the world for their honest opinion of what follows below. Mind due I say my opinion in trying to seek if there might be a chance of others viewing this roughly the way I do, saying I’m not an expect n need to put my mind to rest in my personal experiences that have led me to assume in me defining how I view the relation between LIFE & TIME. If honoured my I kindly ask if there’s any truth in my way of thinking with the little knowledge I know in defining time, life and what follows after this if you happen to share in the same views as me coz I feel there’s more n I can find peace coz I’m stuck, so please shed some light please… 1. Life Through my experiences I think can safely assume that my life is defined by MY PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE, right. 2. Time Through my experiences I think I can safely assume that my time is defined by my PAST TIME, FUTURE TIME AND PRESENT TIME, right? Now this led to identifying the common factors between my TIME & LIFE being the PAST, PRESENT and FUTURE right, done as follows by trying to use simple mathematics and logic; 1. LIFE = PAST + PRESENT + FUTURE 2. TIME = PAST + PRESENT + FUTURE Thus resulting in LIFE equalling/being same as TIME… BUT HOW? WHATS THE LINK? WHAT IS THAT COMMON RELATION BETWEEN THESE TWO REALMS? WHAT MAKES THEM EQUAL? I think if one can identify possible solutions in it then open doors of PURPOSE. Would I be wrong in thinking along these lines to identify ones true purpose of or in LIFE and TIME? PLEASE GUIDE ME IF YOU UNDERSTAND MY POETRY N PLEASE I DO STAND TO BE CORRECTED IF YOUR CORRECTION TRULY MAKES SENSE. N yes I am aware that life is biological process and time is a measurement of events. YOUR LIFE AND TIME IS REAL… SEE HOW YOU/WHO CAN ADD VALUE TO IT, BE IT MONEY, UNDERSTANDING, FEELING, SCIENCE, GOD, ETC… JUST FIND YOUR BALANCE IN ALL THIS BY LETTING THE FEELING OF WHAT MAKES YOU HAPPY BE THE GUIDE(LIGHT)… TRY LIVE HAPPY MY FELLOW HUMAN-BEINGS AT ALL TIMES!!! Thanks

  • @donaldroche30
    @donaldroche30 Před 6 lety

    This is TRULY REDUNDANT how many times can you slice and splice the same video

  • @lanceavery1462
    @lanceavery1462 Před 7 lety +1

    Is it possible there could be more than one big bang? Perhaps we are in our big bang universe, Is it possible we could (our universe) could eventually bump into another one?

  • @HyperNova4239
    @HyperNova4239 Před 10 lety +2

    I love Lawrence's condescending sense of humor. :)

  • @jackschulz7935
    @jackschulz7935 Před 9 lety

    My question is this, It's obvious that the light bending is spotty and not constant due to dark matter or it would appear everywhere and therefore not be noticeable. Since that indicates the dark matter is not equally distributed but rather "clumped" for lack of a better word, does that mean that dark matter is attracting other dark matter through a gravitational force and if so will it collapse itself into some sort of black hole eventually, OR does it mean that it could collapse into some other type of observable matter. And, if it is globular, in it's distribution is that because it WAS evenly spread originally and has contracted to it's current state or was it always globular ?

    • @Shaunt1
      @Shaunt1 Před 8 lety

      +Jack Schulz Dark matter is not affected by gravity.

  • @SimonJackson13
    @SimonJackson13 Před 7 lety

    Not bad and quite funny. I estimate 3 gluon weights though. A light a heavy (not to far apart), and a medium. The medium would be a bit strange in having an asymmetric feature in a glue field. Perhaps a kind of "polarity" mass dipole, maybe even "glue waves"....

  • @bangdon12
    @bangdon12 Před 6 lety

    First and Last names of the scientists :)

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 Před 3 lety

    If we mix the spaces with cretics, sometimes, get confused, now experiencing, why’s we should stay away from it.

  • @InukCF
    @InukCF Před 10 lety

    Actually a magnetic monopole was recently created in the lab, according to Nature.

  • @shirleycirio6897
    @shirleycirio6897 Před 4 lety +1

    Here's a way you can make a difference.
    Reduce Your Use of Single-Use Plastics. ...

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      In the grand scheme of things that makes absolutely positive zero difference what so ever. Not even close to a fraction of a little bit.

  • @Shaunt1
    @Shaunt1 Před 8 lety

    There may be a mind boggling number of "PARALLEL REALITIES".

  • @imac786
    @imac786 Před 6 lety

    well. questions were brilliant but many a answers i found were dissatisfactory

  • @FelipeRodriguez-pv8yu
    @FelipeRodriguez-pv8yu Před 7 lety

    Frank has to be the scientist from spiderman 1. The one who is first killed by Norman Osborne! 😂

  • @ardalla535
    @ardalla535 Před 3 lety

    Multiverse. If there are infinite universes, then there must exist universes that interact with our own and can thus be 'discovered'. Only way around that is excluding those universes by limiting the definition. Any universes that impinge on our own cannot, by definition, be an alternate universe. This seems a bit arbitrary.

  • @MrJamesLongstreet
    @MrJamesLongstreet Před 9 lety +2

    What!? Is that perhaps red wine in the plastic glasses???

  • @hannahbanana4549
    @hannahbanana4549 Před 5 lety

    Um I caught a hick up right off the bat because we are told in all documentaries that we are in a different galaxy and made from different materials, thus why we are not expanding and only now just realized the expansion further out. 🤦‍♀️ Also still no definitive answer on where the center of the universe is; I don't believe she meant as it appears in her question but rather was inquiring about the actual center of what is in the here and now.
    If no one knows that's fine but don't twist the question to be able to give a response that merely sounds believable. Also they say its moving at exponential speeds away from us!!
    How is it possible that we are all expanding and not going in one direction? Because if that is the case then why aren't we focused on the area that is actually expanding in the same direction we are instead of crying about the galaxies that are moving out of sight? Or are they all actually moving in one direction ahead of us and nothing is on the other side of us?
    None of this crap makes any sense and the more I listen to the more BS it seems I am hearing.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      Its not BS, you just ignorant. They are all expanding away from us( except for a very very select few that are in our equivalent of a galactic solar system of sorts which we will collide with one day) . No matter which way you look, all the 100+ billion galaxies are moving away from us. There is no direction which they are not. Due to the speed of light we can look back in time towards the birth of the universe and we can see it was expanding slower back then and is now speeding up.
      We know what the center of here and now is and due to the cosmological horizon it is You. You are the center of the universe.

  • @xsilverdazex1524
    @xsilverdazex1524 Před 2 lety

    If everywhere in the universe is also the center then how can this be explained... lets say a big circle. Im at the center... then Lawrence is 13B light years away.... but still also at the center. ... I can only see 13B each way but so should he, but being already that far he must be able to see even further... how does this happen

  • @felizpierluisi680
    @felizpierluisi680 Před 7 lety

    no conozco a ninguno. i know that the universe is one, one energy, one space . that it.

  • @carlovincetti1352
    @carlovincetti1352 Před 4 lety

    How do they know there are multiverses? Channeled information from entities in that universe.
    Yes, folks quite populated. We are just the young kids on the block and are not invited to the party until we learn how to behave.
    Once we start to think of all humans on the planet we will be working our way into that club.
    Until then only our government will be able to take advantage of any information coming from the cosmos.

  • @hannahbanana4549
    @hannahbanana4549 Před 5 lety

    In regard to their response the question 1) If we are all moving and expanding and not the center of the universe then why is everything outside of our galaxy moving away from us at exponential speeds where we could once see far out galaxies but now we can't? Or galaxies were once moving away from us but now its exponential.
    The moon isn't moving away from us exponentially or anything else in our galaxy.
    And then I saw where they aren't sure if its bending and if so that could cause a reflection that could make things seem as if they are disappearing exponentially but aren't. 🤦‍♀️
    Outside of knowing math they seem pretty confused themselves and know not much because all I hear are contradictions which is a shame because I love hearing about space but I don't want yes men answers. I want facts or even hypothesis but not hypothesis given or fed to us as factual.

    • @MisakaMikotoDesu
      @MisakaMikotoDesu Před 5 lety

      No one understands expansion. Everyone is guessing.
      The answer you're looking for however is that the expansion of space has a weaker effect on matter than gravity, electromagnetism, etc.
      Particles stay together because expansion doesn't have enough energy to pull them apart. Same for the moon and Earth, Earth and the Sun, the Sun and the Milky Way, etc.
      At some point in the future, it is possible that expansion WILL be strong enough to rip these bonds apart. Look into the "big rip" for more info.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      @@MisakaMikotoDesu Guessing how?

    • @MisakaMikotoDesu
      @MisakaMikotoDesu Před 3 lety

      No one was around to see the inflation of the universe (different from expansion), and even though it's visually confirmed that expansion is happening (how else would everything moving away from us in all directions?), no one knows where that energy is coming from to cause it (hence "dark" energy), why it started, and why it is getting faster and faster.
      On top of that there are multiple ways to measure the rate of expansion, yet some of those results do not agree even though the science behind them is thought to be solid. It's often referred to as the "Crisis in Cosmology".
      In a grossly simplified way science is making observations to make very well educated guesses. Doesn't mean the science is wrong but humanity is really trying to find it's way in the dark with many aspects of the universe.

    • @ontheruntonowhere
      @ontheruntonowhere Před 2 lety

      Your question is based on a misunderstanding. We are indeed each at the center of the universe, as far as most theories have it, anyway. This is true no matter where you are in the universe; distant objects are all receding at the same rate because space is expanding everywhere. So, since we are at the center of the universe and space is expanding (even the space within your body and between Earth and the moon, though at incredibly small increments), the further away you look, the more space there is between objects, such that very far away objects appear to be exponentially receding compared to nearby objects. Think of space like a stack of paper which increases by one sheet every unit the higher the stack becomes. Start with one sheet, then two sheets, then four sheets, then eight, etc. By the time you got to a distant galaxy, the number of sheets per unit of distance would be incredibly huge.
      The reason the moon doesn't appear to be moving away from us is that a) it actually is (space is also expanding between Earth and the Moon) but Earth holds the moon to it via gravity, much as everything within a galaxy is held by the combined gravity of everything in that galaxy. Distant galaxies aren't bound by the gravity of, say, the Milky Way, so they are able to recede from us. As a matter of fact, every galaxy in our local group is gravitationally bound to each other and will eventually collide and form a megagalaxy. In the far future, every galaxy outside our group will have disappeared over the Hubble boundary of the visible universe and future beings may think there was only ever this one galaxy they inhabit. As another matter of fact, the moon is gradually slipping free of the gravity of Earth and moving further away by several centimeters a year. This is not due to the expansion of space, but rather that the moon is going a little too fast for the Earth to keep it forever. In the days of the dinosaurs, the moon would have been huge in the sky. Eventually (about 15 billions years from now) it would escape Earth and either orbit or crash into the sun, if not for the fact that in about 5 billion years the Earth/moon system will be consumed by the sun as it enters its red giant phase.
      As far as what you call their 'confusion'. They are not confused, they simply don't know. They also do not claim to know, but each of them follows a particular school of research, and as such they each have their own hypotheses and conduct experiments to determine if their ideas are correct. This is basic scientific methodology. If every scientist thought the same thing, scientific progress would be impossible. It's only by following many leads and having different ideas that many of those ideas can be proven wrong until one idea is left standing (and even that idea can be proven wrong eventually, as happened with Newtonian gravity when Einstein came along).

  • @Paganinifire
    @Paganinifire Před 9 lety +4

    i love how frank wilczek is just giggling

    • @RuthwikRao
      @RuthwikRao Před 8 lety

      +Jacob Gullick the guy's creepy as fuck lol
      The awkward silences, the low fidelity giggles, and occasional physicist humor.

    • @Paganinifire
      @Paganinifire Před 8 lety +3

      dude hes the best

  • @carlovincetti1352
    @carlovincetti1352 Před 4 lety

    That same channeled information has hologram technology vast in our universe, with crystals and magnetism for the electrical power to those societies. Most of the UFO's seen by humans is technology from earth, not beyond.

  • @stanleykubrick8786
    @stanleykubrick8786 Před 5 lety

    Maybe Frank Wilczek's grandson will one day be able to explain how the WTC building all dropped to the ground at free fall speed as half disappeared into the breeze as fine concrete dust. As L. Kraus says the whole story has to fit together and it just doesn't. If these 'physicists' could devote 24 hours to this subject the world would be a much better place. They must be either too busy are scared to discuss this subject.

  • @YTpajamas
    @YTpajamas Před 10 lety +15

    Why is that called debate?

    • @PandemoniumPirateRadio
      @PandemoniumPirateRadio Před 10 lety +1

      I'm guessing that it's because the event is an attempt to discuss the forefront of physics & what the debate is about inside that field at the moment.

    • @IulianusTabernarius
      @IulianusTabernarius Před 10 lety +12

      Because in the united states we don't have a concept of debate, its either people talking to an audience, giving a lecture, or yelling at each other.

    • @jordannovak9545
      @jordannovak9545 Před 10 lety +1

      Its discussing the controversies within the field of physics (ie string theory.. multiverse.. etc)

    • @Frankyjones1000
      @Frankyjones1000 Před 9 lety +1

      Jordan Novak
      IDK. Have you ever notice that titles on CZcams are not always accurate?

    • @jordannovak9545
      @jordannovak9545 Před 9 lety +1

      Franky Jones Marketing!

  • @luisroman3
    @luisroman3 Před 9 lety +1

    36:37 What the hell did she say?

  • @tomcloud54
    @tomcloud54 Před 3 lety

    Consciousness is their missing pillar. The tool used to understand all the rest is more Universal and more a part of all of the other processes than is acknowledged.

    • @pro-v7500
      @pro-v7500 Před 3 lety

      That would be metaphysics, not physics.

    • @tomcloud54
      @tomcloud54 Před 3 lety

      @@pro-v7500 I respectfully disagree. I am not talking “The Secret “ or “The Power of Positive Thinking “ but rather things like the proven fact that outcome depends on observer and the autonomous nervous system functionality without what we consider conscious intent and many other things. We don’t yet know how thinking happens in humans let alone other life forms or collectives such as forests or cells.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      @@tomcloud54 Outcome does not depend on observer because that outcome has been the exact same since the start well before, It is simply a failing of modern physics teaching that so many people believe this when it is simply not at all true. We can look way back at time and see that the laws of physics were essentially the same baring a strange speed up we witness a few billion years ago.

  • @bobsmith-ov3kn
    @bobsmith-ov3kn Před 7 lety

    2:30 But this assumption is WRONG. The universe MUST HAVE some sort of objective 3 dimensional geometry that CAN objectively label a certain region the "CENTER" and a CERTAIN DISTANCE towards any given EDGE/HORIZON. Even if our big bang cosmology is completely correct, there is STILL going to be some sort of 3 dimensional geometry to the universe that is theoretically measurable. Now it may be that our event horizon is simply far too small, and that it doesn't exist in any particularly special region like near an edge or near the center, that we simply CANNOT MEASURE this geometry in any way, because what we can measure appears to be completely flat and uniform. But if we could hypothetically zoom out further and look at say 10^10 event horizon distances the nature of the 3 dimensional geometry might begin to manifest.
    First off of course we only have our own vantage point. It is completely fallacious to assume any other point in the universe will have an identical flat distance squared acceleration that we appear to see. But REGARDLESS it's quite easy to imagine an observer on a planet somewhere could make their measurements of the accelerations of distant galaxies, and DETERMINE to some extent some facts about the geometry of the universe and their place in it.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      Your assumption is the one that is wrong. There is no need, and there is no 3 dimensional point that can be considered the center.

  • @sacriptex5870
    @sacriptex5870 Před 6 lety

    krauss are using a power band on his wrist... hahahah funny

  • @androlibre9661
    @androlibre9661 Před 7 lety

    The idea of parallel realities pisses me off. You mean there's another version of me on some parallel universe that's living the life and I'm stuck here living this shitty life

  • @raymulder1
    @raymulder1 Před 5 lety

    This is a complicated subject and cannot easily be explained in a post, but we will try our best to give a broad view of the facts...There never was a big bang. The Cosmos is a precipitation of matter. Science have done a great job getting this far, but is incapable, and always will be incapable of discovering or measuring the primordial atom, or primary particle, with which all that exists is composed of. The reason is simple: humans do not have the means, biologically, or mechanically, or 'spiritually' to detect such minute matter/particles. The real primary particle(primordial matter) is billions of times smaller than what we have managed to detect so far. The Hadron Collider is a waste of time and money and effort... At every point where science hits the end of it's efforts to find the primary particle they fail and call it some energy field. Look deeper and you will find that a field is matter in motion...energy can NEVER be measured without matter, and energy does not exist without matter. The Cosmos consists of matter, in billions of various densities, and there is no space, as we think of it, anywhere. All primordial/primary matter has internal energy and matter is what created consciousness. If there was no matter consciousness would not exist. Everything that exist is primarily identical, and a human is simply a Monad(Pythagoras), which is an individual primordial particle, which has advanced through billions of years, and thus evolved consciously to it's present state...and is still far from the goal of life. So...There are 3 aspects to life...Matter, consciousness and energy...and not one of them can exist without the other 2. Matter creates consciousness, matter is how we are able to know of energy, and as energy interacts through matter it causes consciousness to awaken and know of life. So we could say that energy is the cause of life, but it is not the consciousness of life, because consciousness is a result of the slow awareness of the Monad as it becomes aware of the interaction of energy in and on matter. Consciousness, now, thus, can allow energy to be directed in such a way that it creates forms, which is known as thought, which we see in the 'physical' world as objects. Everything that exists is therefore conscious in some degree and as consciousness advances in each primary particle/Monad/Self it becomes more able to form, or manipulate objects with thought. Every manifestation in what humans call the 'physical' world is a collective of molecules bound together by thought and sustained by magnetic forces. Nothing is permanent and decay is simply a form of evolution of the collective molecular/atomic constituents. Humans have advanced to the level where they can control an entire organic body (form) using a type of 'inductance' of energy(matter) through the nervous system, this 'inductance' ceases at 'death' and the Monad/Self is immortal.

  • @untetheredsoul4335
    @untetheredsoul4335 Před 4 lety +1

    I was a little disappointed as I was hoping for more "adventurous' answers with regards to Parallel Universes.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      Never gonna get it because the multiverse theory is a fairy tale.

  • @ElvisWoods
    @ElvisWoods Před 10 lety

    Wait!...Is that one of those magnetic bracelets Lawrence is wearing?.

    • @Anyashiina
      @Anyashiina Před 10 lety

      hehe no XD Looked like one of those watch things with a thin band. Or at least for the sake of humanity, hope so

    • @PongoXBongo
      @PongoXBongo Před 9 lety

      Perhaps a FitBit or such similar device? I know he pointed out that a speaker at a previous debate was wearing one.

  • @douglong3341
    @douglong3341 Před 4 lety

    Wow she is book smart and beautiful I envy the man who can take her heart

  • @sanjays6120
    @sanjays6120 Před 10 lety +2

    God, I love science!

    • @JEKAZOL
      @JEKAZOL Před 5 lety

      God will be happy.

  • @172ngan8
    @172ngan8 Před 2 lety

    I think, there is no universe expansion, it's all empty space with matter throughout. Someone asked did the expansion of universe create more spaces or expanded by using existed spaces. They had no clue, and could not defined "expansion". But they kept talking about "Expansion", LMAO.

  • @sonnycorbi1970
    @sonnycorbi1970 Před 5 lety

    I SAW A BUMPER STICKER THAT SAID, “THE REASON WE ARE ALL HERE IS BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ALL THERE”.
    (SORRY, I LIKE WRITING IN CAPS FROM TIME TO TIME AND IT TICKLES ME THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE - I HAVE ACTUALLY RECEIVED REPLIES THAT SAY, WHY ARE YOU SCREAMING AND ANOTHER ONE, YOU ARE BEING RUDE
    GEEEEEEEEZ, WHERE DO THESE PEOPLE COME FROM AND WHY ARE THERE SO MANY OF THEM :-)

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 Před 3 lety

      Because most people understand what a social norm is and why we ascribe meaning to things yet there is you here who seems completely unable to function properly in a society and only consider yourself.

  • @ciurdypsyco
    @ciurdypsyco Před rokem

    I don't wanna go into this, BUT.......

  • @redventrue1
    @redventrue1 Před 10 lety

    Frank Wilczek is the smartest person on that panel.

  • @octavianapanait1918
    @octavianapanait1918 Před 4 lety

    Paralell Universes can help you..If You know how to approach..Lord bless..Amin...

  • @rainman3927
    @rainman3927 Před 8 lety

    Peter Higgs proposes a new particle and we spend billions of Euro and next 80 years looking for it. Great! But can anybody explain to me WHY are we (science) not considering Consciousness as the fundamental force of nature? After all, we are discussing supersymetry and this suggests that certain matter-carrying particles (some particles in human bodies) could have supersymetric force-carrying particles (consciousness particles, which permeate the Universe just like the Higgs Bosos). Can anybody with scientific background comment on this?

    • @RuthwikRao
      @RuthwikRao Před 8 lety

      +joseph rain the simple answer is: consciousness is still not understood well enough to be making these kinds of extrapolated and speculative claims based on whatever new-age intuitions that birth them.

    • @rainman3927
      @rainman3927 Před 8 lety

      +Ruthwik Rao yes, I agree, I am not one to speculate, just examining possibilities... but don't you agree it's equally speculative claiming that consciousness arises from physical matter? As you said, the truth is we simply don't know...

    • @RuthwikRao
      @RuthwikRao Před 8 lety +1

      joseph rain it is. But it is more probable given how we can make intelligent systems for artificial intelligence out of nothing but circuits and software. The nature of consciousness and its origins is still considered one of the most esoteric questions in biology especially neuroscience, including philosophy and metaphysics. We haven't found a way to quantify the human "experience", just like we haven't found a way to quantify subjects like morality and ethics. There is no current convincing objective explanation to any of these hard problems but people are working on it to make sure they find one. :)
      Till then, people like Deepak Chopra can sell their snake oil and keep making millions off of gullible people.

  • @vincentparis2655
    @vincentparis2655 Před 4 lety

    what are they drinking? lol

  • @robpratt5356
    @robpratt5356 Před 3 lety

    If she was my teacher I would have done WAY better in physics

  • @PeggyJame
    @PeggyJame Před 3 lety

    In the middle of the Sun is Iron

  • @JEKAZOL
    @JEKAZOL Před 5 lety

    Lawrence Kraus: Moon Cheeks.

  • @ricuzzom9269
    @ricuzzom9269 Před 8 lety

    Solo les falta la copa y el puro.

  • @jasonvengroff1396
    @jasonvengroff1396 Před 6 lety

    I like to play poker,,,,,,,So does This mean?
    EVERY TIME I GET DEALT TWO CARDS, My options are-- -DO I FOLD?-----DO I CALL?-----DO I RAISE?------DO I GO ALL IN???( AND EACH ONE WILL CREATE IT'S OWN UNIVERSE?}THEIRS NINE PEOPLE SITTING AT THE TABLE!!!!AND EACH ONE WILL CREATE IT'S OWN UNIVERSE? DO THE MATH,,,PLEASE
    AND THAT'S ALL BEFORE THE FLOP(Never mind the other million's of other people playing poker thought-out the world.... AND EACH ONE WILL CREATE IT'S OWN UNIVERSE?)
    ONLY GOD COULD KEEP UP WITH THAT kind of MATH.....
    Peace

  • @Boogieplex
    @Boogieplex Před 5 lety +3

    Maria is quite possibly the hottest physicist/scientist in the multi-verse.

  • @octavianapanait1918
    @octavianapanait1918 Před 4 lety

    I have a red ballon in my room..it has white cyrcles and it..full cyrcles..I say it the Universe too..☺️..Lord help and bless..Amin..

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 Před 2 lety

    How it’s strouds , showing themselves after a few billions years !

  • @Trev0r98
    @Trev0r98 Před 4 lety +1

    As usual, Krauss has a very hard time getting over himself and his glib "jokes".

  • @ElijahColeman
    @ElijahColeman Před 9 lety +5

    David Gross may be brilliant, but he has no clue how to behave when on a live mic.