@@nadtz yeah, mistakes happen. It could have been an oversight in a rush, or an attempt at a joke that missed. I just figured I'd start any discourse on a positive note.
Seriously, when's the last time Michael Dell made news? EMC acquisition? I've met that clown twice during sales calls and lost both deals. Dude is a clown all the way around.
Love your videos, very informative, one piece of feedback: Next time you’re comparing specs, instead of blurring out the items you’re not discussing, could you possibly highlight those fields that you are? Thank you!!
Great presenter doesn't read the slide. He tells you vivid (~emotional) story about the things on that slide with extra bits and often using different words. Slide is only there as a "handout" to burn into your retina numerical differences and make your marks and comments. 2 sources to create more connections in brain. Limiting reader is counter productive. He started this a few months back and I've been hating it. Using pause just to see and decide for myself.
@@anttikangasvieri1361 I had the fastest intel 4004, managed to get it to perform like a kind of modern i5 cpu with a clock speed of 2.6Ghz running windows 10 on it, also had doubled the core count and added multithreading in that overclock. later used my cpu downloader software to download a new cpu in that system however (litterally, even showed it in the download a new cpu for free video)
It seems like frame generation is a gimmck to artifically raise fps, kinda like how TV makers do it by replaying the same frame twice to raise from 60 to 120 fps.
Any Screen that plays uses a 120 Hz panel playing any content at 120 Hz when the content is not 120 fps does this it's not a trick it's the only way it works or you would get every frame it does not have from the content as black or half drawn (AKA Screen taring). My monitors are 2 x 120 Hz and 300 Hz, the 300 is running at 240 purely so the frame timings line up with the 120's otherwise you get screen taring.
TV sets generate intermediate frames using the same principle. After enabling this, games from previous generation consoles ran smoothly at 30fps on such TVs, although the delays were greater than without them.
On the Epyc part numbers, it would be advisable to be aware that the two parts with the model numbers ending in X are X3D outfitted parts. If your workload benefits from the extra cache, those would be the ones you want.
Many thought that AMD would be dead after the Phenom-era. Many thought that AMD would be even more dead after the FX-era. The first Ryzen-generations were making hope, but they were no breakthrough. And look where AMD is today! They are the literal Phoenix from the ashes. Today, intel is facing enormous difficulties. Their decade of absolute dominance over AMD made them lazy, and today they are paying the price. However, they will be back. It may take a few years for intel to recover, but they won't be destroyed.
2:40 This makes no sense. Why would the PX version on the 12 core part have higher base/boost clock and higher TDP compares to the P part but on the 16 core part the numbers are reversed. Must be a typo somewhere?
Yeah, I was asking myself th same. PX was the higher one and P the lower one ... except on the 16 cores where it's reversed. Weird. I wouldn't put it besides AMD to do something like that.
In the first section showing gameplay of some game with a hotel scene, the receptionist offered to call another room for the person standing there. Nobody at a hotel will offer to call random rooms.
For servers, CPU performance is not the entire picture. Intel has accelerators on the motherboards that offload a ton of server overhead to those accelerators. Gamer Meld and a bunch are trying to bolster AMD and topple Intel. Remember, AMD reaps TSMC's foundry's superior node process. ASML is the real technology giant that supplied TSMC with the equipment. Keep Intel viable, as their new foundry has received the first machinery IIRC at $518 million. Intel has been in cahoots with ASML for a decade designing these new fabs. Look out. Ok guys, when you report earnings, blah, blah, blah, include some of those investment numbers.
Wtf is whith moving all across the tables and charts?? Giving ne nausea, just highlight what you're discussing. And no need for explosion stock footage in the middle of a table slide 💥
I was asking myself the same thing. If it's with only dual channel and 28 PCI-E lanes (understandable, since it uses AM5) then ... what's there left to it ? Maybe full ECC memory ?
Ok, I checked their datasheet when trying to answer an idi0t here in the comments and apparently the PX chips have 3D V-cache, going from 64 MB that the others have, to 128 MB.
@Winnetou17 Hey, thanks for the reply. I've been wondering about this, because i myself have a Ryzen 7950X3D, and try to understand if the EPYC 4584PX could be better or worse, does it have 128MB Cache total? Cause my 7950X3D has a total of 145MB Cache, adding it all up. Also these AM5 EPYC chips are much more expensive than the Ryzen 7000 lineup, yet they dont's seem any better at all.
@@Gielderst I think they're the same on the cache size. That 145 MB figure is L2 + L3, while the 128 MB is only L3. L2 for Zen4 cores is 1 MB per core, so 16 cores means 128 + 16 = 144 MB .... hmm, don't know how they got 145. Maybe they added L1 too, but that's not usually done. These Epyc CPUs are not for performance, they are for the other server-related important topics, like stability and security. And other enterprise features, like better virtualization. But I don't know exact details. I'm also not in the market, so to speak :))
@@goregejones7248 What a waste of a comment. Please say actual details please. It still has only dual channel memory (consumer level) and 28 PCI-E lanes (consumer level)
@@Winnetou17 As far as I can tell it is simply the server certification and the support of ECC memory. I am really dissapointed by the lack of pcie lanes to be honest.
Yes, such a GOLDEN AGE. Where every competing products cost almost the same. Or is so bad that no one wants to buy it, which is the only reason why you might ever see a compelling price on it.
3:58 Nvidia has had AI CPUs since 2015, quite literally first to market. I have several of them, the one from 2020 is pretty darn good, about the same AI performance as a 3050(several times more than the 8700G/8845HS) with a low powered SODIMM form factor model that only produces 100TOPS, but again, its the size of a stick of laptop RAM. They even have a low end version of this that produces only 40 TOPS, but apparently has a TDP of 8w Before anyone says ThEsE aRe EmBeDdEd NoT fOr CoNsUmEr" Quit parroting experts that dont know their foot from their toilet seat. There is no difference between a consumer and embedded processor other than what device they're installed into, you can take the SODIMM version of Orin, put it in a laptop shell, and now its a consumer CPU. No one wants them for consumer CPUs because 95% of people dont want ARM based Windows, and those that do, dont want to spend $2500 on a laptop that has a slower CPU than an i5-1240p laptop that costs $800, and Nvidia is not going to give up that margin on the embedded parts
EPYC with dual channel memory? Y? Anyway.... Dude, AI PCs have virtually nothing to do with the processor. It's about RAM capacity and bandwidth. Processing speed is MILES from being the limiting factor, especially when it comes to LLMs. TECH CZcamsRS. STOP THINKING AI HAS TO DO WITH PROCESSORS. AN AI COMPUTER IS NOT JUST "*a regular PC with ai chips*". Stop. Please God stop. You're pushing manufacturers in the wrong direction. MEMORY. GET THEM TO UP MEMORY. THAT'S EVERYTHING. Why do none of you bother to talk to someone who uses AI locally before you post these videos? It's not just you.
so sounds like nvidia hasn't really got something to compete properly now, probably due to holding back and relying on market share to much. ask that next year however might mean both good for nvidia or bad for nvidia, or in between. as it doesn't give of clear performance numbers. but likely they will make such a APU next year with arm and probably a NPU, and probably also some nvidia integrated graphics like a rtx 4060m or such.
Intel hasn’t had the last laugh at anything in years. There cpus are garbage right now and nothing short of a miracle will change that, not even fanboy wishes upon a star.
Just built a 7800x3d machine so I can't see myself going to nvidia cpu unless there is some extremely compelling reason. I am excited for the gpu. 5080 ti when!
Who fuckin cares about tech thats not even used and will take like 20+ years to take off in games. RTX 1000 is already like 7 years old but still almost no games use raytracing and if you use it your framerate drops harder than your grandma falling down the stairs (also fuck dlss if i want my game blurry and full of artifacts i can smear vaseline on my monitor). I miss the times where you got a finished product and not an early access.
There's no such thing as RTX 1000. But I agree overall. By the time AI stuff is actually good and useful, it would probably need 500 TOPS or something like that. Meaning that a puny 10 or 45 TOPS NPU won't cut it, only your beefy GPU would. And you'd need the computers from 2026, not what you have now. It's mind blowing how hard the companiese are hyping up the AI.
Neither the hardware nor the software is intelligent. Can either think? No. Really, this is just a jazzed-up evolution from our "expert systems" which we have had for most of my career and that the public is completely oblivious of. Show me either of those two thinking and I will show you a liar, musk springs to mind.
AI not exciting? Hahaa... this might come as a surprise to you, but I'm not a gamer at all. I actually subscribe to your channel (and similar channels) because the same hardware that is of interest to gamers is of interest to AI researchers (especially the student/hobbyist/smb market, who can't afford data center cards). My newest PC build would look exactly like a gaming rig to anybody who didn't know what i was using it for, but it's totally an AI/ML box to me. 🙂
Number of cores doesnt really matter if those cores are clocked down. Better to have fewer higher clocked cores than have a bunch of low clocked cores with a high boost as it is unlikely the CPU will be always hitting the theoretical max boost clocks especially not across all cores...
the first 3 aren't even server cpu's, they're barely consumer cpu's. its been a decade since I last went "shit..I'mma run a single machine as a server without virtualization, 4 cores should do it" cause I'm not into wasting power and money, if my server requirements are that low I'd just run a raspberry pi or the likes for waaaay cheaper.
Intel crea il set di istruzioni, amd e' solo elaboratore da sempre. Intel e' la madre, ha creato cisc e vliw. Amd fa cpu speciali che vanno nello spazio, e anche nvidia si basa su Intel.
Wang I'll bet I'll lose my shirt in the next 20 minutes. Double or nothing Wang?! Are you sure? I'm just a lowly truck driver hauling Nvidia GPU's. Wang there might be Big Trouble In Little China (Taiwan).
NVIDIA CPUs no thank you I'll pass, we already had experience with the dreaded and highly unstable NVIDIA nForce chipsets, NOT AGAIN, I'll stick to Intel !!! and NVIDIA for GPUs. Both NVIDIA chipsets and AMD chipsets are garbage.
@@ZackSNetwork 7800x3d beats 14900k in gaming, now you would say Intel is better at productivity, cut the crap out, Intel 13th and 14 th gen have stability issues, so your forced to use baseline profile, which limits power and performance, after Intel baseline profile for 14900k, 7950x beats it, without Intel baseline profile Intel wins.
@@goregejones7248 yeah? do a quick google on the Intel vs AMD market share. Intel is still at around 75%. Gamers make up a tiny portion of the market, business/enterprise will still pick Intel any day over AMD
@@innie721 Are you living in 2015? Fanboy at its peek. In Q2 2024 the total market share of x86 processors, Amd is 33.3%, In which desktop processor, AMD is 42.3%, In Laptops processor, AMD is 19.9%, In Server processor, AMD is 13.4%. Intel is losing its market share year over year, check the stocks, AMD's stock is higher than Intel's. Gain some knowledge, Intel fanboy.
@@goregejones7248 Gain some knowledge? You literally confirmed what I just said? AMD is only 33%. Share prices don't mean anything either when comparing companies, clearly you know NOTHING about the stock market. The number of shares available for purchase heavily dictates the price of shares, Intel has over 4x the available shares of AMD which will heavily dilute the price, but you didn't know this did you?
Are they going to destroy intel with 24 pcie lanes? 😂😂😂😂 The only advantage is avx512 and this is not even truly supported... If AMD does not offer a decent amount of pcie lanes they are not going to take over most of intel's share.
Frame Gen does NOT increase performance. We really got to stop saying this
yes it does ok? yes it does
@@badpuppy3it's more like a tradeoff than anything
Well amds fluid motion frame generation increases games upto 90% and nvidia details say 50% improvement.
That's what I've read btw idk if ya being sarcastic or what lol.
What i hate about Frame Gen is the input delay as a FPS gamer its BAD! you can feel it
"... a gentleman with Dell..."
That was Michael Dell ;)
Kind of funny to miss that one especially when it said it on screen.
@@nadtz yeah, mistakes happen. It could have been an oversight in a rush, or an attempt at a joke that missed. I just figured I'd start any discourse on a positive note.
Seriously, when's the last time Michael Dell made news? EMC acquisition? I've met that clown twice during sales calls and lost both deals. Dude is a clown all the way around.
Some guy? Really know your industry leaders
I was thinking the exact same thing LOL 😂
Love your videos, very informative, one piece of feedback: Next time you’re comparing specs, instead of blurring out the items you’re not discussing, could you possibly highlight those fields that you are? Thank you!!
I agree! Great suggestion!
Came here to say just that. People want to see the whole chart while you are going through specifics. Think highlighter instead.
Great presenter doesn't read the slide. He tells you vivid (~emotional) story about the things on that slide with extra bits and often using different words. Slide is only there as a "handout" to burn into your retina numerical differences and make your marks and comments. 2 sources to create more connections in brain. Limiting reader is counter productive. He started this a few months back and I've been hating it. Using pause just to see and decide for myself.
The rest could easily just be greyed out which would easily draw attention to the main focus while remaining readable overall
AMD EPYC "4004"???? 🤔
Lisa, you trollin'.
Quite a bit faster than intel 4004 😂
Lol that is a meh launch
@@anttikangasvieri1361 I had the fastest intel 4004, managed to get it to perform like a kind of modern i5 cpu with a clock speed of 2.6Ghz running windows 10 on it, also had doubled the core count and added multithreading in that overclock. later used my cpu downloader software to download a new cpu in that system however
(litterally, even showed it in the download a new cpu for free video)
@@ted_van_loon w10 on 4-bit cpu is quite an achievement.
@@anttikangasvieri1361 bro made a 4 bits version
It seems like frame generation is a gimmck to artifically raise fps, kinda like how TV makers do it by replaying the same frame twice to raise from 60 to 120 fps.
thats a dirty trick bro
Yes
Any Screen that plays uses a 120 Hz panel playing any content at 120 Hz when the content is not 120 fps does this it's not a trick it's the only way it works or you would get every frame it does not have from the content as black or half drawn (AKA Screen taring). My monitors are 2 x 120 Hz and 300 Hz, the 300 is running at 240 purely so the frame timings line up with the 120's otherwise you get screen taring.
TV sets generate intermediate frames using the same principle. After enabling this, games from previous generation consoles ran smoothly at 30fps on such TVs, although the delays were greater than without them.
the year 3000 is literally just nanoseconds away
skibidi toilet
Yeah.
Let's see those 9000 series CPUs from AMD!
"A gentleman with DELL" 😂
That's Michael Dell bro....
That Gordon Ramsay really got me XD
Im ready to see those 9000 parts for sure! June 3rd between 7:30 and 10:30pm in US.
On the Epyc part numbers, it would be advisable to be aware that the two parts with the model numbers ending in X are X3D outfitted parts. If your workload benefits from the extra cache, those would be the ones you want.
That gentleman is Michael S. Dell the found of Dell.
Been pretty quiet regarding Nvidia and their upcoming GPU's.
Probably won't be announced at computex.
Nvidia will release at winter. So no news till autumn.
Many thought that AMD would be dead after the Phenom-era. Many thought that AMD would be even more dead after the FX-era. The first Ryzen-generations were making hope, but they were no breakthrough. And look where AMD is today! They are the literal Phoenix from the ashes. Today, intel is facing enormous difficulties. Their decade of absolute dominance over AMD made them lazy, and today they are paying the price. However, they will be back. It may take a few years for intel to recover, but they won't be destroyed.
2:40 This makes no sense. Why would the PX version on the 12 core part have higher base/boost clock and higher TDP compares to the P part but on the 16 core part the numbers are reversed. Must be a typo somewhere?
Yeah, I was asking myself th same. PX was the higher one and P the lower one ... except on the 16 cores where it's reversed. Weird. I wouldn't put it besides AMD to do something like that.
@@Winnetou17 Server components compete in Watts used. So having 50W less consumption with merely a couple hundo' Hz less clock is a BIG win.
The l3 cache is insane....
Destroyed Intel? Sure AMD have catch up due to Intel complacency but Intel still dominate the cpu market.
It increases framerate not performance, performance isn't affected by framegen.
In the first section showing gameplay of some game with a hotel scene, the receptionist offered to call another room for the person standing there. Nobody at a hotel will offer to call random rooms.
1:04
Um, dude? The gmen "with Dell" was "a Dell." That's Michael Dell, the dude who started Dell in his college dorm room, a story he frequently recounts.
Good to see someone else noticed 😂
I guess 4K wasn't here to stay 😢
The 3D models should be revealed at the same time as the non-3D models but I don't think they will.
@1:43 Do Not touch the metal contacts of electronics
For servers, CPU performance is not the entire picture. Intel has accelerators on the motherboards that offload a ton of server overhead to those accelerators.
Gamer Meld and a bunch are trying to bolster AMD and topple Intel. Remember, AMD reaps TSMC's foundry's superior node process. ASML is the real technology giant that supplied TSMC with the equipment.
Keep Intel viable, as their new foundry has received the first machinery IIRC at $518 million. Intel has been in cahoots with ASML for a decade designing these new fabs. Look out.
Ok guys, when you report earnings, blah, blah, blah, include some of those investment numbers.
can u put those am5 epyc on consumer boards
Yes
ccx=12core: with 64-96 MB L3:
AMD with 2ccx or ccd:
24c/48th:
infi catch L3 conect:
my current CPU idle on desktop at 160 - 180 watts,and it is just 12 core
Wtf is whith moving all across the tables and charts?? Giving ne nausea, just highlight what you're discussing. And no need for explosion stock footage in the middle of a table slide 💥
great information... but that unNAtural INtonAtion of the VOcals. It makes it hard for me to get through a video.
The hits just keep comin’ for Intel.
*insert Pepe smirk
Frame Gen really does increase performance.
5:02 the question is "is there, and will there even ever be an "ai-pc" market"
Note to Gamer Meld: "Days away" means that the product will be released to consumers within a week. We know English isn't your strong suit .
So what are the differences between these EPYC chips and Ryzen 7000???
Seems a bit like marketing to me
I was asking myself the same thing. If it's with only dual channel and 28 PCI-E lanes (understandable, since it uses AM5) then ... what's there left to it ? Maybe full ECC memory ?
Ok, I checked their datasheet when trying to answer an idi0t here in the comments and apparently the PX chips have 3D V-cache, going from 64 MB that the others have, to 128 MB.
@Winnetou17 Hey, thanks for the reply.
I've been wondering about this, because i myself have a Ryzen 7950X3D, and try to understand if the EPYC 4584PX could be better or worse, does it have 128MB Cache total? Cause my 7950X3D has a total of 145MB Cache, adding it all up.
Also these AM5 EPYC chips are much more expensive than the Ryzen 7000 lineup, yet they dont's seem any better at all.
@@Gielderst I think they're the same on the cache size. That 145 MB figure is L2 + L3, while the 128 MB is only L3. L2 for Zen4 cores is 1 MB per core, so 16 cores means 128 + 16 = 144 MB .... hmm, don't know how they got 145. Maybe they added L1 too, but that's not usually done.
These Epyc CPUs are not for performance, they are for the other server-related important topics, like stability and security. And other enterprise features, like better virtualization. But I don't know exact details. I'm also not in the market, so to speak :))
@Winnetou17 Thank you again so much, for the explainer.
Is anything really a no brainer anymore??? Sorry but I just hate that statement.
What is the difference between an Epyc 4564P and a 7950X???
Server cpu vs consumer cpu
@@goregejones7248 What is the difference between server cpu vs. consumer cpu? :)
@@goregejones7248 What a waste of a comment. Please say actual details please.
It still has only dual channel memory (consumer level) and 28 PCI-E lanes (consumer level)
@@Winnetou17 As far as I can tell it is simply the server certification and the support of ECC memory. I am really dissapointed by the lack of pcie lanes to be honest.
As a business owner, Intel is in no trouble, because all those parts cost what they do for tax purposes. Only consumers are affected.
Yes, such a GOLDEN AGE. Where every competing products cost almost the same. Or is so bad that no one wants to buy it, which is the only reason why you might ever see a compelling price on it.
Every time i see your thumnail it seems like you have an issue with intel.Maybe you like AMD a lot.
'come back next year' could mean that there are dedicated NPUs on the dGPU. They do not need to be built into CPUs.
It’ll be the next thing everyone will utilize baked into cpus.
3:58 Nvidia has had AI CPUs since 2015, quite literally first to market.
I have several of them, the one from 2020 is pretty darn good, about the same AI performance as a 3050(several times more than the 8700G/8845HS) with a low powered SODIMM form factor model that only produces 100TOPS, but again, its the size of a stick of laptop RAM. They even have a low end version of this that produces only 40 TOPS, but apparently has a TDP of 8w
Before anyone says ThEsE aRe EmBeDdEd NoT fOr CoNsUmEr"
Quit parroting experts that dont know their foot from their toilet seat. There is no difference between a consumer and embedded processor other than what device they're installed into, you can take the SODIMM version of Orin, put it in a laptop shell, and now its a consumer CPU.
No one wants them for consumer CPUs because 95% of people dont want ARM based Windows, and those that do, dont want to spend $2500 on a laptop that has a slower CPU than an i5-1240p laptop that costs $800, and Nvidia is not going to give up that margin on the embedded parts
Aibpergrpmance will use more compute so the render hrahics rasterisation will suffer
Everything is days away… that’s called a calendar
My next system, Nvidia CPU and an Intel GPU.
Its not x86 so gaming will be neutered.
Nuclear power plant I see 😂
I use Ai upscaling for content creation, this will be a welcomed improvement.
that nvidia "performance" update wont be interesting for anybody in gaming ever^^
Maybe I'll finally retire my Ryzen 5 1600
When dark mode?
Damn - AMD puts an Epyc hurting on Intel Xeon.🙂 When I need a NAS, I know what to look out for. 😀
Asking Nvidia if they have a place in the AI PC market is dumb. Obviously they do.
Me on my 6 year old core i3 8100 watching how amd DESTROYS intel cpus 😂😂
That's Michael Dell, not just 'someone from Dell' 🙄
EPYC with dual channel memory? Y?
Anyway....
Dude, AI PCs have virtually nothing to do with the processor. It's about RAM capacity and bandwidth. Processing speed is MILES from being the limiting factor, especially when it comes to LLMs.
TECH CZcamsRS. STOP THINKING AI HAS TO DO WITH PROCESSORS. AN AI COMPUTER IS NOT JUST "*a regular PC with ai chips*". Stop. Please God stop. You're pushing manufacturers in the wrong direction.
MEMORY. GET THEM TO UP MEMORY. THAT'S EVERYTHING.
Why do none of you bother to talk to someone who uses AI locally before you post these videos? It's not just you.
I really, really do not care about AI in games. AI is just the next big scam.
so sounds like nvidia hasn't really got something to compete properly now, probably due to holding back and relying on market share to much.
ask that next year however might mean both good for nvidia or bad for nvidia, or in between. as it doesn't give of clear performance numbers. but likely they will make such a APU next year with arm and probably a NPU, and probably also some nvidia integrated graphics like a rtx 4060m or such.
Come on AMD!! Give a doggie a bone and just give us hints to chew on until the keynote!!!
i just got a heartattack seeing this title. Just bought a ryzen 7 7800x3d.. But this is not the video for me haha
They can release gold plated and diamond encrusted cpu's and I still wouldn't pollute my system with amd crap .............
Intel will have the last laugh seemingly how they bought ASML newest chip making machine
Intel hasn’t had the last laugh at anything in years. There cpus are garbage right now and nothing short of a miracle will change that, not even fanboy wishes upon a star.
Just built a 7800x3d machine so I can't see myself going to nvidia cpu unless there is some extremely compelling reason. I am excited for the gpu. 5080 ti when!
Dude 80ti cards are dead. It’s 5090 or nothing lol.
AMD destroyed Intel years and years ago.
Nvidia releases cpu, we get new cpu. Nvidia gets the price of cpu to 2k. We cry.
Who fuckin cares about tech thats not even used and will take like 20+ years to take off in games. RTX 1000 is already like 7 years old but still almost no games use raytracing and if you use it your framerate drops harder than your grandma falling down the stairs (also fuck dlss if i want my game blurry and full of artifacts i can smear vaseline on my monitor). I miss the times where you got a finished product and not an early access.
There's no such thing as RTX 1000.
But I agree overall. By the time AI stuff is actually good and useful, it would probably need 500 TOPS or something like that. Meaning that a puny 10 or 45 TOPS NPU won't cut it, only your beefy GPU would. And you'd need the computers from 2026, not what you have now. It's mind blowing how hard the companiese are hyping up the AI.
intel is cooked
Neither the hardware nor the software is intelligent. Can either think? No. Really, this is just a jazzed-up evolution from our "expert systems" which we have had for most of my career and that the public is completely oblivious of. Show me either of those two thinking and I will show you a liar, musk springs to mind.
Oh.. your one of those people.. saying X instead of times.. 3 times the performance makes more sense to me.
3 multiplication symbol the performance.
Amd already destroyed Intel 4 years ago.
Long Live AM5
Feel like that an Asian emogi 😂
AM5 only last till 2025.
Zen 6 will be on AM6 and not AM5.
@@winnb4968 the did say we are gona get 11000 one am 5 since 8000 was not exactly for pc
AI not exciting? Hahaa... this might come as a surprise to you, but I'm not a gamer at all. I actually subscribe to your channel (and similar channels) because the same hardware that is of interest to gamers is of interest to AI researchers (especially the student/hobbyist/smb market, who can't afford data center cards). My newest PC build would look exactly like a gaming rig to anybody who didn't know what i was using it for, but it's totally an AI/ML box to me. 🙂
Number of cores doesnt really matter if those cores are clocked down. Better to have fewer higher clocked cores than have a bunch of low clocked cores with a high boost as it is unlikely the CPU will be always hitting the theoretical max boost clocks especially not across all cores...
ryzen 9000 is 1 year away xD
come back next year..wtf kinda garbage answer is that.
amd destroying intel in cpu now :D
I'm never watching you again, frame gen =/= better performance.
Those aren't real frames. Clickbait
Ryzen 9000 Let's goooo!!!!
Give us the epyc 4004 with zen5 😂
0:49 who cares??
the first 3 aren't even server cpu's, they're barely consumer cpu's.
its been a decade since I last went "shit..I'mma run a single machine as a server without virtualization, 4 cores should do it" cause I'm not into wasting power and money, if my server requirements are that low I'd just run a raspberry pi or the likes for waaaay cheaper.
Who wants to buy my 4090 for $1400
LOL?
@sethstriker what baldy.
I’m keeping my 4090 as backup once the 5090 drops.
$1400 is a budget 4090. 😂
@@GoonyMclinux I have the Gigabyte gaming OC model with 2 years left of warranty
AMD Mark as usual, get some real news.
amd distroys intel what ever
Intel crea il set di istruzioni, amd e' solo elaboratore da sempre. Intel e' la madre, ha creato cisc e vliw. Amd fa cpu speciali che vanno nello spazio, e anche nvidia si basa su Intel.
Stupid title usually means stupid content…do not recommend.
go sell AMD ...
i now remember why i unsubbed from this channel lol
Correction: AMD Just RELEASED CPUs To DESTROY your WALLET
Wang I'll bet I'll lose my shirt in the next 20 minutes. Double or nothing Wang?! Are you sure? I'm just a lowly truck driver hauling Nvidia GPU's. Wang there might be Big Trouble In Little China (Taiwan).
Gamer Meld: "Ryzen 9000 is DAYS AWAY!"
Alternate Universe Honest Gamer Meld: "Ryzen 9000 is MONTHS AWAY!"
Suday
LOL THIS GUY IS A STRANGE TYPE
Tf?
who cares
NVIDIA CPUs no thank you I'll pass, we already had experience with the dreaded and highly unstable NVIDIA nForce chipsets, NOT AGAIN, I'll stick to Intel !!! and NVIDIA for GPUs. Both NVIDIA chipsets and AMD chipsets are garbage.
AMD already destroyed Intel some time ago. Also... Jensen Huang looks kinda synthetic in the video. Strange.
In what exactly? They still aren’t the fastest just more power efficient.
@@ZackSNetwork 7800x3d beats 14900k in gaming, now you would say Intel is better at productivity, cut the crap out, Intel 13th and 14 th gen have stability issues, so your forced to use baseline profile, which limits power and performance, after Intel baseline profile for 14900k, 7950x beats it, without Intel baseline profile Intel wins.
@@goregejones7248 yeah? do a quick google on the Intel vs AMD market share. Intel is still at around 75%. Gamers make up a tiny portion of the market, business/enterprise will still pick Intel any day over AMD
@@innie721 Are you living in 2015? Fanboy at its peek. In Q2 2024 the total market share of x86 processors, Amd is 33.3%, In which desktop processor, AMD is 42.3%, In Laptops processor, AMD is 19.9%, In Server processor, AMD is 13.4%. Intel is losing its market share year over year, check the stocks, AMD's stock is higher than Intel's. Gain some knowledge, Intel fanboy.
@@goregejones7248 Gain some knowledge? You literally confirmed what I just said? AMD is only 33%.
Share prices don't mean anything either when comparing companies, clearly you know NOTHING about the stock market.
The number of shares available for purchase heavily dictates the price of shares, Intel has over 4x the available shares of AMD which will heavily dilute the price, but you didn't know this did you?
false news
This guy is lame
This video was ....I couldnt go past 10 seconds of the annoying voice
W
Are they going to destroy intel with 24 pcie lanes? 😂😂😂😂
The only advantage is avx512 and this is not even truly supported... If AMD does not offer a decent amount of pcie lanes they are not going to take over most of intel's share.
👍✌