BCP X500+ 10 second STi

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 02. 2017
  • bcpdirect.com
    Boost Controlled Performance X500, stock location stock inlet, 545whp 536wtq STi. 10.98@124mph.
    Tuned by Alex Kallin at BCP
    8.2:1 CP's
    Manley rods
    X500 plus
    BC272's
    Pocket port
    Stock size Super Tech valves and springs
    TGV delete
    ID1300
    Walbro 450 in stock hanger with factory line to the firewall
    -6 fuel line from firewall
    IAG rails
    Cobb 3 port
    Aeromotive FPR
    4 bar MAP
    SD conversion
    Cobb FF sensor
    Tomei equal length
    8mm Grimmspeed phenolic spacer
    ETS 4" IC core
    Air pump block off
    TiAL BOV
    LFT7AIX .28 gap
    Fluidampr
    Stage 5 Exedy triple disk
    Fuel lab 818 inline filter
    Killer Bee oil pan
    Killer Bee pick up
    Killer Bee baffle
    Mishimoto thermostatic oil cooler
    Mishimoto 2 row radiator

Komentáře • 21

  • @getnanoed
    @getnanoed Před 4 měsíci

    I want a 10 second setup in my gc8.

  • @Pittimus84
    @Pittimus84 Před 3 lety

    How would compare this against a FP Black?

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 3 lety +2

      I had an FP Black after this turbo actually (there’s videos of it on my channel). The FPB made gobs of power and put MPH on fast. The X500+ made quicker torque lowering the range but not necessarily more than the FPB. I would go with the Black if I were to do it all over again.

    • @Pittimus84
      @Pittimus84 Před 3 lety +1

      @@gunslingermustang For street use, mountain driving and an occasional track day at a road course, which do you feel would better suit that the FPB or X500+? I am having a built motor done for my 2020 STI, wanted a FPZero and put 600whp down on e85 but the wait time would of delayed the build by months. I think I will be happy with a lot of useable power at 550whp with the X500+ but I'd like to hear it from someone who has both.

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 3 lety +2

      @@Pittimus84 with that mountain driving thrown in there you’d want a bit more low RPM response at a cruising RPM, in my mind. X500+ might be more beneficial with those conditions. Keep in mind, the 545whp we made with this turbo was at 27psi. A more reasonable boost level would make about 500whp. So you’re at a 100whp disadvantage with peak power compared to the FPB. The X500+ will run out of top end power after it peaks where the FPB will carry power for a longer RpM range. They have totally different capability.

    • @Pittimus84
      @Pittimus84 Před 3 lety +1

      @@gunslingermustang Thanks for the feedback, makes for informed decisions!

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 3 lety +3

      @@Pittimus84 you’re welcome. It’s a tough choice but you may like the faster power of the X500 but not be disappointed with the FPB at all.

  • @complexoutlook
    @complexoutlook Před 5 lety +1

    whats with that powerband?

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 5 lety

      Specifically what about the powerband?

    • @complexoutlook
      @complexoutlook Před 5 lety

      ​@@gunslingermustang both tq and hp start to drop was this the 10 second tune? you'd think it would hold to redline

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 5 lety +1

      That was the same tune on the 10.98, 11.07, 11.09 and 11.17 passes. It had an internal wastegate that wouldn’t hold more than 24psi near redline. 27psi where peak WTQ and WHP.

    • @complexoutlook
      @complexoutlook Před 5 lety

      @@gunslingermustang that makes more sense thanks for the info

  • @VirgGaming
    @VirgGaming Před 4 lety

    is this with stock heads or?

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před 4 lety

      VirgGaming pocket porting, stock size SuperTech valves and BC272 cams.

    • @VirgGaming
      @VirgGaming Před 4 lety +1

      @@gunslingermustang yeah i just saw in the description haha thank you, im thinking of doing a build similar to this. I just need the block and the turbo

  • @moisesr7840
    @moisesr7840 Před rokem

    Are TGV Delete a must?

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před rokem +1

      I couldn’t give real power numbers between with and without. But the TGV’s are an obstruction that will make you have to work the turbo harder to push past them. I would highly recommend that you delete them. It’s easier power not having them in the way.

    • @moisesr7840
      @moisesr7840 Před rokem

      @@gunslingermustang what about fitment, my build needs to be emission complaint. Some turbos require tgv delete.

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před rokem +1

      @@moisesr7840 fitment shouldn’t be an issue. I couldn’t tell you about the emissions part. The TGV is only there for cold starts is freezing temps. Other than that, they stay open.

    • @moisesr7840
      @moisesr7840 Před rokem

      ​@@gunslingermustang forgot to ask, is this a closed deck block?

    • @gunslingermustang
      @gunslingermustang  Před rokem

      @@moisesr7840 it was. I think it was an IAG “Stage 3” engine with all the hardware upgrades.