One question: as you mentioned dyut was played twice. During first dyut when Duryodhan showed his thighs and Bhima makes a vow how come he knows that they would be going on 13 years Vanvas that time?
Recently saw an expert on Sangam channel refute your dating of 5000~ BCE for Mahabharatha. He claim that anything before 3000~ BCE is absolutely wrong as prr the data from other dynasties across time using interpolation of evidence. Looking forward to your rebuttal of his reasoning, pls take time out for it. Love your work and thankyou sir
If I'm correct that guy's name is Raja Ram Mohan Roy. That guy is literally a McCaulay product. He keeps quoting the dates of English and American Historians who base their analysis on AIT. What more can I say!
I presume you understand the difference between ' attempting a refutation' and 'successfully refusing a claim' or 'making a jackass of oneself while claiming a refutation'
Very nice presentation sir.... waiting for your next part. czcams.com/video/W2YuGQRmZ9c/video.htmlsi=GTVziNSukoH4h64b Above is the link for Raja Ram Mohan Roy who is refuting your date of Mahabharata war.....plz check and share your opinion
8:50 i can see the translation is correct , but how can bhima say "after 13 years" when there was no mention of such 13 years of vanvas in first game of dyuta but it came later in second game , is sanjay wrong in quoting bhima?
Nilesh ji, if you want your own podcasts on your own channel to get high numbers of viewers (which because of your knowledge you deserve) then please take a few lessons on your content presentation and on your content delivery.
Unnecessarily dragging the point in parts after parts and convincingly landing nowhere to prove the claim. It is obvious that the partiular incident would always be repeatatively referred in toto in other Parvas as well. Plz come to the point sharp & specific without wasting watch time of the people.
![Ayodhya-Lanka-Ayodhya [14 years of Rama's travel during Vanavasa]](/img/n.gif)
One question: as you mentioned dyut was played twice. During first dyut when Duryodhan showed his thighs and Bhima makes a vow how come he knows that they would be going on 13 years Vanvas that time?
Recently saw an expert on Sangam channel refute your dating of 5000~ BCE for Mahabharatha. He claim that anything before 3000~ BCE is absolutely wrong as prr the data from other dynasties across time using interpolation of evidence.
Looking forward to your rebuttal of his reasoning, pls take time out for it.
Love your work and thankyou sir
If I'm correct that guy's name is Raja Ram Mohan Roy. That guy is literally a McCaulay product. He keeps quoting the dates of English and American Historians who base their analysis on AIT. What more can I say!
Who is this individual? What specific date s/he is claiming for the year of the Mahabharat war?
I presume you understand the difference between ' attempting a refutation' and 'successfully refusing a claim' or 'making a jackass of oneself while claiming a refutation'
Very nice presentation sir.... waiting for your next part.
czcams.com/video/W2YuGQRmZ9c/video.htmlsi=GTVziNSukoH4h64b
Above is the link for Raja Ram Mohan Roy who is refuting your date of Mahabharata war.....plz check and share your opinion
8:50 i can see the translation is correct , but how can bhima say "after 13 years" when there was no mention of such 13 years of vanvas in first game of dyuta but it came later in second game , is sanjay wrong in quoting bhima?
The second game of dice occurred shortly after the first game, within a few hours, resulting in the '13 years' of time spent exile.
I asked the same question. References by Sanjay seem incorrect.
Part 1 - czcams.com/video/BfpDcLPCJpc/video.html
Part 2 - czcams.com/video/BZcAdSXmPZU/video.html
Part 3 - czcams.com/video/x_BEBRieSiI/video.html
"Promo sm" ✅
Nilesh ji, if you want your own podcasts on your own channel to get high numbers of viewers (which because of your knowledge you deserve) then please take a few lessons on your content presentation and on your content delivery.
Unnecessarily dragging the point in parts after parts and convincingly landing nowhere to prove the claim. It is obvious that the partiular incident would always be repeatatively referred in toto in other Parvas as well. Plz come to the point sharp & specific without wasting watch time of the people.