The Airbus A320neo Vs Boeing 737 MAX - Which Plane Is Best?
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 07. 2022
- If you travel by air or live by an airport, then most likely, you have seen the Boeing 737. The aircraft type has a long history of being used by most major airlines around the world and is Boeing's bread and butter.
However, the aircraft is rivaled by the Airbus A320 program, which, according to sales, has caught up significantly to Boeing for the coveted title as the world's most successful commercial aircraft. The plane that will lead into the future much depends on the most recent series of each type, specifically the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320neo family. So how do they compare? Let's find out.
Article: simpleflying.com/the-airbus-a...
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com - Zábava
I’ll take the one that doesn’t crash and doesn’t ignore safety issues
one 737 coming right up sir
Airbus is ignoring hella safety standards. They just aren’t getting caught since they are in europe
@@soonerguy8011 👀👀👀
@@soonerguy8011is this a joke?
@@henriqueluizhogrefe1324 American butthurtism.
I've gone transatlantic on a MAX 8 (Norwegian, EDI-SWF and return, November 2017) and it was surprisingly comfortable, but let's be honest: Airbus has got this one
I've been on both but never noticed much difference. I'm 6ft'1 to be exact but I find the 737 more comfortable due to more legroom than the 320 otherwise all other dimensions are quite literally equally Parred.
In term of passenger comfortability, YES for Airbus. It is their trademark.
@@brettdemauna9332 Leg room depends on the configuration of the airline. Its not a fault of the aircraft.
@@naftyloescher. Of course we all know of that.
Been flying many times JetBlue on A320 and many times feel the pressure change in cabin. Never felt that in 737-8 flying AA.
Not sure if leaving out the A321LR and XLR is right? The LR is already flying and the XLR started test flying and as it seems the airlines love the 321XLR ....
They don’t really compete with the 737 though, more the 757
@@EvanAviator They don't compete with the 737 because 737 has nothing in its family that can compete with them; thanks for its 40 years old airframe design.
The A321LR and A321XLR are in fact in direct competition with the 737 series but are currently uncontested by Boeing so far, as Boeing's NMA project is still on the drawing-board
@@jahangiryounus6674 First of all, the 737 is older than 40 years. It's the Airbus airframe that's nearly 40 years old, which is to say, both airframes are old. However, the 737 that's flying today is a much more refined aircraft than the one that flew in 1967.
Also, the A321 is not mentioned in this video because Boeing doesn't have a new aircraft to compare it to other than the Max-10. Since the Max-10 is not yet in service, the proper aircraft to compare are the Max 8 and 9 to the A320. The A321 is better compared to a 757, and that's not a fair fight.
I agree it should have been mentioned, while Boeing has nothing to compete, fleet commonality gives airlines a reason to consider smaller members of the LR/XLR family.
Are you sure? The Airbus has problems Fly this new beautiful amazing Airbus A320 and it see it setn a new record, czcams.com/video/I9gELPxPG8Q/video.html
That airbus 321 has got impressive figures for range and capacity.
A321XLR?
@@RuhjedVentula lr
Xlr is 8700km range
Who told you that and are sure about that? Are you sure? The Airbus has problems Fly this new beautiful amazing Airbus A320 and it see it setn a new record, czcams.com/video/I9gELPxPG8Q/video.html People need to checks the facts!
Reply
cabottaxi
cabottaxi
7 months ago
nm not km @@Pajtim2023
I've been flying for over fifty years. The A320neo is simply a delightful aircraft to fly on. I've flown on 737-ngs. However, I do not recall ever being on a 737 Max.
I usually prefer Boeing Jets, but when it comes to the smaller aircraft, the a320 family just looks so much better.
I disagree. I usually also prefer Boeing products but I think the max looks stunning. However im torn on the decision between the max and the neo and the only thing holding the neo back for me is the side view look of it
Naa the split scimitars tho
Why don't you check the facts because it just might save your life! Who told you that and are sure about that? Are you sure? The Airbus has problems Fly this new beautiful amazing Airbus A320 and it see it set a new record, czcams.com/video/I9gELPxPG8Q/video.html Over 1500 people have been killed flying on the A320! People need to checks the facts! Have you been to lie about the facts and how Airbus A320 and family have killed over 1500 people and had allot more crashes. I wish ppeople would read the truth about and how the A320's have a huge amout of crashes? Tsk, tsk, tsk Airbus lies so much!
@@wubalub2535 Old Design and The 737Max feels smaller and cramped than the 320neo
@@gerardanderson9665feel the opposite. The airbus was made to stuff people in
Everyone knew that the 737 NG would be last update for the 737 family and a new clean-sheet offering would replace it. Everyone except the quarter-to-quarter bean counters running Boeing that is.
LOL😁
Fly this new beautiful amazing Airbus A320 and it see it setn a new record, czcams.com/video/I9gELPxPG8Q/video.html
But then Boeing said: no, let's make another 737, but unsafe and unreliable lol 😂
Result: 737 reputation completely RUINED (just like what happened with the old DC 10) 😂
@@fra93ilgrandeI loved the dc-10 though
I'll go with Airbus any day.
Innovation in plane design is another aspect you should take into account.
The 737 as a base is TWENTY years older than the A320.
You can't forget that each new model is only marginally different from the base, just think of the engine issue that lead to the MCAS having to be added to the 737.
Yes, the 737 MAX might be safe, but innovation can only take you so far.
Fundamental design choices CAN'T be changed down the road with a plane (without changing the type rating and the consequences that brings with it).
I'm not saying the A320 is a completely up to date plane either, any 35 year old base wouldn't be, but i'm saying the issues the MAX has are issues that didn't have to be, just because they wanted to make "a quick buck" by upgrading the 737 one more time, when they REALLY shouldn't have.
That assessment is weird. The Dreamliner is the most innovative commercial aircraft in the air. Guess who builds them? I rest my case.
@@sainnt yeah sure. Except boeing can't turn them over to customers. Massive fail
BTW A350 is better
@@billybill6604 I don't know if an A350 is quieter than a Dreamliner, but I know that the Dreamliner is more innovative. And, although the two aircraft are constantly compared, the A350 is a larger aircraft. Even an A350-900 is larger than a 787-10, the the A350 is compared to a 787 because of the mostly composite construction, and are both used for similar purposes. However the Dreamliner is more cost effective for airlines, which is why it outsells the A350 almost 2 to 1.
@@sainnt I don't see the 787 as more innovative than the A350. At all. The problem with 787 is that it is ridden with problems. They are piling up at boeing
@@billybill6604 That's clear Airbus bias. The aircraft has been flying for 10 years already and faced 2; major problems; lithium batteries and Trent 1000; engines, 2; items not even made by Boeing. Currently issues with quality are nothing but the FAA grasping straws. Aircraft that's already been delivered were never recalled. There's nothing wrong with the Dreamliner.
And now we have the answer. The one that doesn't fall apart mid-air.
If Airbus doesnt make a huge blunder and china wont shake up the game too much, I can imagine a downward trend for Boeing.
As they have to invest into "fixing" the 737 desaster and their failed foresight in marketdemands (sustainablility f.e.), Airbus gets again a huge headstart in the development of the next Generation.
Very nice video. Keep up the good work.
Brillant video! As both a fan of Boeing and Airbus this is really down the line. I work at an airline that has both 737, and A320 family. The turn around is a bit faster with the B737 and that means better revenue. I love both families, and both do a great job. Great job Long Haul
The experience-based comment on turn around time is a useful tidbit of information. Could you, or anybody, come up with possible explanations for the difference? Is the MAX easier to clean, or unload people and/or baggage, or refuel?
@@fbkintanar it’s lower to the ground and was designed in a time where ground vehicles were not as present as they are and is therefore more versatile
- a armchair idiot (me)
Gotta say, as a mechanic having worked on both. Even ignoring Boeing’s MCAS tragedy, the 737 Max doesn’t hold a candle to the 320Neo’s. The 737 Max still just feels like an upgraded version of a 60 year old airplane while the Neo manages to feel like a brand new airplane
Nah the a320 neo is not really different from the a320ceo, it is just an upgraded version of an existing plane just as the max is an upgraded version of the 737ng.
exactly, the A320 was already modern enough it didn't need the change, the 737 max was a desperate update to a plane that should've been retired 20 years ago@@Hk-uw8my
Oh yes! The Ultimate Battle! A320 neo VS 737 MAX! Personally I prefer the A320 neo because it's much better and a lot safer than the 737 MAX and it's more fuel efficient and my favorite narrowbody aircraft alongside with the A220 300
Sadly the MAX is more efficient
@@Bonazest9169 but terrible to fly with
@@F12010Team yes
@@Bonazest9169 Efficient in what way? Efficiency is just a ratio of input to output.
@@F12010Team how?
I would absolutely not be reassured about MAX fixes. Boeing has had huge issues with quality over the last decade at least. See also the 787, 777X and so on. I also don't see any substantial better specs on the 737. In fact, the video does its best to be dismissive of any Airbus advantages.
But the 737 max is better than the a320 on paper. It's true. The a320 is also cheaper but I think the 321xlr and LR will give AB a much larger advantage as well.
Considering airbus's large backlog , the 737 will continue to get more orders for customers not willing to wait longer for the a320.
Nothing dismissive . All facts
@@mmm0404 apart from range and safety and price.
The MAX's crashes are due to pilot error. Granted good training for the pilots, it should have been fine. The MAX is definitely a better, safer, and cheaper aircraft than any airbus garbage.
@@paulinejackson5861 LOL good one.
All of this channels videos have a hidden preference for Boeing, other than that they’re pretty fun, and to the guy saying pilot error lol on you
Why is there no mention of the Airbus A321neo LR & XLR?
Gracias por tan buen análisis .😀
Great video. 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Not sure about the sums, 737 started 1967 and A320 1984, so Boeing had hell of an advantage?
interesting tha simply flying DOES NOT MENTION THAT FACT.
Interesting video, but I'd say largely flawed. The single biggest cost to airlines is fuel over an aircraft's life not the upfront cost. It doesn't matter if a 737 can carry X passengers a further Ynm if it uses more fuel to do that. According to Wikipedia (I know, probably questionable, but the intent stands), the A320neo has a fuel efficiency per seat of 2.25 litres / km and the 737 MAX 9 has 2.28... that's a 1.3% difference which might not seem much but is actually enormous in the aviation industry. Note that the addition of Sharklets on the A320neo gave a 3-4% fuel burn saving, and only up to that much on flights with long cruise segments!
It's way more complicated than this as these numbers are likely assuming a full cabin, full fuel tanks and maximum ranges, airline operations obviously very rarely meet all 3 of these criteria. Airlines will run all the very complicated calculations and find out what suits their network best to even achieve a fraction of a percentage in fuel savings. Paying slightly more for an aircraft you want will pay for itself in the long run in fuel savings.
How do you do a comparison without considering fuel burn? It's the top expense over capital and salaries!
Both A319NEo and 737-7 are niche aircraft and have poor sales and prospects. Whether A320NEO is better than 737-8 is debatable, but the solid fact is that A321NEO in its 3 variants soundly outsells 737-9&10 3 to 1. The yawning difference will spread further as time passes, and Boeing so far has not announced a MAX replacement.
The 737-7 has way more orders than the A319, and those numbers will only increase when the plane is in service. The A319 has proven to be a poor seller because the A220-300 makes more sense, so the Max 7 will be much more successful.
@@sainnt well, even if more it is still a very modest number for 737-7 as well, and for essentially 4 airlines. Had Southwest not insisted a lot for their own reasons, the version would not have seen the light of day. Both are essentially cut and shut versions, hence they have too big wings and engines for their size. This results in excellent field performance, good for high and/or hot airports (not a particularly needed feature in the market) and their downside is that they have poorer economics than their respective siblings. Niche airplanes.
@@luisdestefano6056 Airbus has a total of 73 A319 orders. Boeing has a total of 234 Max 7. That's like calling the A380 niche aircraft. The A319 is only niche because it makes more sense for an Airbus customer to buy the A220-300 instead. Boeing will always sell more Max 7 because they don't have regional aircraft to compete with the A220, but the Max 7 makes way more sense to an airline than an A319.
@@sainnt So why bother with an obsolete 737-7 when you can just buy newer, superior in every way A220-300s?
@@sainnt So why bother with an obsolete 737-7 when you can get a superior A220-300? And if you need something bigger, with more range, then buy a A32xNEO.
Air bus all day every day
#airbus
facts
Fax
Haha as if you get to choose what the airLines are buying
#airbusforever
Yes thank you I have been waiting for this! Airbus ftw
Airbus fans here are talking as if they decide which planes their airlines purchases. Both the planes are quiet and comfortable. I really like their interiors too. Love both Airbus and Boeing.
The neo variants on airbus are in extremely high demand being very new and very fuel efficient.
Essentially the 737 hails back to the 727 cockpit and even the 707, with tweaks, fixes and extensions. By contrast the A320 is a much more contemporary design. My money is certainly on Airbus with a far better design and upgrade potential. The 737 is at the end of life.
3:15 If anyone knows the name of that background music please, thank you
Cool,man!
Can somone please tell me the name of the background music at the beginning ? THANK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Always a pleasure to watch your insightful videos. Thanks!
Just what I expected!
I traveled in both, both planes were new or max 2 years old. I find the 737 max of Turkish Airlines much smoother and quiter as the A320neo also from Turkish Airlines as a pasenger.
I also flew with TK A321neo and the Max 8 but I have the opposite experience. the max in my opinion was noisier... None of them was smooth because it were turbulent flights
An issue affecting the A320s that could potentially drive sales to Boeing is the ongoing problem with the Pratt PW1100G engines powering the Airbus. A flaw in the powdered metal used to make the high-pressure turbine discs could lead to cracks and uncontained failures. This led to the grounding of many aircraft to disassemble and inspect the engine cores. While the A320 is available with a choice of engines from Pratt & Whitney or CFM, the 737 only flies with the LEAP engine by CFM.
A similar problem even worse found on PW4000-powered Boeing 777s and EA GP7200 powered A380s. United Airlines are on the edge of planning to phase out their PW powered 777-200/200ERs and keep the GE90 powered ones
Great!
2:20 If that were the case, we'd probably be seeing the A380 #1000 by this point 😂
A320neo family FOREVER
I'm pretty sure that this video was made based on information from Wikipedia especially seating capacity. Because in real life, I don't know if there is A320NEO with 195 seats. Mostly especially low-cost carriers would go with 186 seats single class config (EasyJet, Frontier, AirAsia, IndiGo). On the other hand, you mentioned only 178 seats which described in Wiki as 2-class config not a single class config which mostly 189 seats and up to 210 seats for MAX-200. The MAX-9 has much larger airframe and significantly carry more passenger in single class config than A320NEO, so I don't think they could be compared.
As a passenger I enjoyed the max more, now that I flew both.
I liked the overall look of the interior and the non existing noise during the flight.
I especially love how noiseless it is during explosive decompression at 16,000 feet. 😂
airbus has less noise
Boeing Sky Interior sure makes the 737 look cooler and nicer on the inside, but the A320 family is still wider
I have always loved the wider cabin so you can move around more. Probably my favorite feature of the a320 over the 737max.@@EuropeanRailfanAlt
@@Roboseal2 In Summer 2023 I have flown on two 737s and an A321, I found the A321 more spacious aswell, so I agree
Tldw: the one that doesn’t crash
Yes,I do!
The whistleblower death is very suspicious . Boeing going through a bad time currently . I like airbus and boeing
Looks like I got my answer!
Great video really enjoyed but I do think a320neo is a winner e.g a321xlr and a320neo due to range and efficiency but b737max is a great competitor but it didn't have a great start.both aircraft manufacturers did a great job. Thanks for the video
A320neo is better at price I mean
@@planespotting-rodion2494 at the price? Certainly not.
In the video it is stated that the a320neo is cheaper than the b738 max and b739 max specifically a320neo $110m b738max $121m b739 max $128m
@@planespotting-rodion2494 Those are list prices. Sales prices are around $50-55M, 737 being cheaper.
@@hakanevin8545 also depends on deals of the manufacturers but thanks for the correction
I like it that way!
I don’t think he explains more important things like efficiency cost per seat ect, instead of how powerful the engines are
I am a Boeing fan, but have had good and bad flights from both families of aircraft. Boeing has to eat a lot of humble pie and regain the trust of the flying public, airlines, and government regulators. I know they are up to the task! Also, there is so much demand that Airbus couldn't fulfill every order, if every 737 customer ditched Boeing. I would advise the Airbus CEO to be careful before increasing A320 family production. He could end up hurting the Airbus image, harming contractors/vendors, and his own Max crisis. With global supply shortages, I think he plans are too ambitious.
I have no faith in Boeing. It's no longer an engineering company run by engineers. It's run by bean counters who put a dollar value on lives. As long as Boeing is run by financial people and MBAs, they're screwed. These kinds of people do not have moral or ethical values. They are only smart enough to maximize profit for themselves at the expense of everyone else.
??? Production only start when customer put out their purchase order. Why airbus need to be wary. You a symphathizer for Boeing? Don't because they make tons of money for the past decade monopolised the world with boeing plane.
@@truthful3777 So all you look at is money? What about all the lives that pursuit of money has claimed? Maybe you should instead look at all the people who were killed by it.
@@AquariusTurtle You on weeds or something? What are you talking about? Can you be specific?
@@truthful3777 Airbus has a massive backlog and I read management is interested in increasing production to make deliveries sooner. This could lead to future production delays due to increased pressure on suppliers etc. I admit I am a Boeing fan, but genuinely feel they need to regain the worlds trust!
Having your birds grounded for weeks or months might skew the cost calculation rather heavily. On Boeings side we have had mandatory groundings for 737, 777 and 787. Will have to ask around for Airbus groundings
Why don't you check the facts because it just might save your life! Who told you that and are sure about that? Are you sure? The Airbus has problems Fly this new beautiful amazing Airbus A320 and it see it set a new record, czcams.com/video/I9gELPxPG8Q/video.html Over 1500 people have been killed flying on the A320! People need to checks the facts! Have you been to lie about the facts and how Airbus A320 and family have killed over 1500 people and had allot more crashes. I wish ppeople would read the truth about and how the A320's have a huge amout of crashes? Tsk, tsk, tsk Airbus lies so much! It apparent Airbus pays off crooked Europeans while Boeing is honestly run company and thats why Airbus has so many crashes!!!
RIP BOEING LOL 💀😂 its founder must be twisting in his grave... 😅
@@kimberlywilliams7543 facts
One of my customers a retired commercial pilot told me the saying in the day among pilots was if ain’t a Boeing I ain’t a going
But that was in the days when Boeing's competitors were Lockheed and McDonnell-Douglas. Both of which had an iffy safety record.
I always thought the max looks awesome tho. And pretty much every online resource I can find talks about the max is slightly more fuel efficient than the neo.
As for me I love both but Still Have to go with Airbus. It's better due to longer distances and Love every Airbus
For people saying "737 Max airframe is old and unsafe"
The software is what made it unsafe, not the 60 years old airframe, airlines don't care how old the airframe is, as long as it gets upgraded along with technological development in the aviation industry, as is the case for A320 and 737.
MCAS's purpose was to change the flight characteristics and control surface handling to make it similar to 737NG as a solution for engine placement problems.
Technically the 737 Max is flyable without an MCAS system, but it was installed for training cost cuts, and somehow Boeing decided to hide the system back then.
*Old is gold* but that being said everything has its end. 737 Max family would be the last ever 737 generation Boeing has developed, and it's time for Boeing to develop a new clean sheet narrowbody jet "NMA".
The new big and heavy engine in the old airplane is unsafe. Boeing should redesign the airfame to fit the new engine. Hell No...they want quick bucks and comes out MCAS to prevent the natural tilt up of the plane when extra boost is applied on the engine.
@@truthful3777 You seem to be ignoring the fact that Boeing didn't tell the pilot about MCAS when the incidents could've been avoided. The causes aren't mainly in the engine placement or the natural pitch-up behavior in 737 Max at all, but flight characteristics that had to be changed to make it easier to fly for sake of cutting costs for Boeing customers.
Blame Boeing for hiding a poorly programmed software, not the 737 Max itself. If it's not safe right now, FAA and EASA wouldn't have cleared it to fly in US/EU airspaces in the first place.
I prefer listening to aviation experts, not average unknowledgeable people.
*I'm still flying this thing anyway*
I wouldn't say it's unsafe, it is old, but not unsafe at face value.
What they did to get away with not having to modify it, THAT is the sin in this story. It's got a name: MCAS!!!
I've flown in the 737 plenty of times, and it's a perfectly fine plane, but the MCAS is a system that was handled (very) poorly, in every way!
It's not even that MCAS is a bad system, it's the way they implemented it, plain and simple.
@@grandnagus5851 Agreed!
Southwest is the reason for the crashes. They demanded the MAX feeling of handling to the pilots match the NG models. As such, the had to put in the systems that modified the feel. This was, however, never communicated to the other airlines and as a result that computer equipment/programming was an unspoken "secret" that caused the crashes. That blood is on WN's head.
But Boeing is the one paying the price for it.
How I miss the 757-200. As a passenger I like the 737-600 and -800 but would never willing fly on a Max. Another area of concern for me as a passenger is the emergency evacuation time for the long fuselage 737 versions, the lessons of the BA 737 Manchester Airport Disaster were quietly forgotten.
I also wonder if the so called "Miracle on the Hudson" would have had quite such a happy outcome if the aircraft was a 737.
If Sully was the pilot, it would have been fine. If the Lyon Air or Ethiopian Air Max pilots, then no, they would have tried to return to LGA or went for TEB. Not the same outcome…..
Garuda 421 and that is a 737: why did you forget me?
A320 is better for Passenger, the seats are wider and also cargo space above Head.
With safety being considered, its always airbus. But oh boy, the boeing sky interiors are the best must say. Beautiful interiors
Do you really think that the Boeing cabin is better than the Airbus? You only have to look at the modern joystick control on the A320 to see that it is better than the outdated rudder system used on the 737.
@@LordCommanderEdTN Well then. Airbus has had over 1000 fatalities, Boeing has made way more planes than airbus with some in an era where computer technology and safety features DIDN'T EXIST!!! They are in the wrong with MCAS, but the whole entire company is not made up of criminals. Also, the 747 was incredibly reliable, sure it had a few incidents before computers, but what about United 811? China 006? They sustained incredible damage and the structural integrity of the plane was so strong that the planes managed to land safely
Begin!
The one that doesn't crash or has bolted doors randomly come off.
I’ll give the nod to the Airbus A320… and I’ve worked for Boeing
What about airframe life? When the 320 series first started flying in the US, a friend who worked for the FAA said the airframes would not last as long as Boeing's.
There are definitely Boeings still flying that are older than the company airbus.
Well your friend is completely wrong.
@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe Don't think that any aircraft still flyin is 53/54 years old...
I've travelled by air before Mila was born, and what's more,I don't even live by an airport!
I love extra space!
The one that didn’t kill people.
the a320 has killed ppl but yk
I really love A320 neo family, so I have to side with them
Boeing 737 max has the edge in cargo capacity and fuel efficiency🛫
I’m pretty sure he said in a previous video that the max 9 can have a capacity of 210 seats.
That's probably not wrong since the MAX 8 can hold 200 passengers for Ryanair.
Nothing like the past crashes? Famous last words, the DC-9 still crashed after it was "fixed". Only time will tell if the MAX is safe or even if the 7 and 10 get certified at this point.
Exactly. It has to earn that designation. It should be considered "awaiting [safe] designation" until it gets many more hours.
Or if the -10 is even built
After watching Netflix documentary about 737 MAX, I doubt they wen to “rigorous” testing
Netflix ? sure sir
netflix is not reliable mate
What about resale value? When 10 years plane goes on sale, how much do you get for B737 and how much for A320 with similar cycle?
No one talks about that, and 10 year old well maintaned plane is not cheap.
A320 for me
I’m pretty sure he said the max 9 can have a capacity of 210 seats.
So many materials used for aircraft
Will🤔 we run out of materials for aircraft?
Do🤔 old aircraft's materials get reused♻️ & put on new aircraft
09:52 so a new type of error occurs 😊
as a boeing fan i can't defend 737 here. its obvius that A320 had decent edge over 737 family. but 737 still remain my personal favourite. i just like the design of 737 Max much more than A320 Neo.
although 737 Max isn't competitive enough to fight A320 Neo, boeing still have some edge when it comes to freighter variant which A320 series lacks. the sales in this category isn't large though.
Edit: someone in my reply told me that airbus had freighter variant of A320 so that's a good thing! Finally airbus started to catch up to boeing in freighter market but airbus still needs long way to go to challenge boeing in this segment👍
Actually, Qantas received an A321-200P2F last year, and development and certification for the A320-200P2F is under way, so your statement that the A320 family has no freighter variant is no longer accurate, though it is understandable why you would think that, as the A320/A321P2F program is still rather recent.
@@AutismTakesOn thank you for the info!
@@Arkan_Fadhila You're welcome.
Regarding more Airbus freighters, the A350F, (based off the A350-1000), is expected to enter service starting in 2025. It would compete with the 777F and join Airbus's other freighters: The A320-200P2F, A321-200P2F, A330-200F, A330-200P2F, and A330-300P2F.
Yeah!
Hooray!
Who won?
Who's next?
You decide!
Is the boeing 737 max safe in 2022 ??
Yes it is very safe
The maxs come like an ikea flatpack with leftover fittings you’re not sure whether were meant to be used.
You can't make that statement with all honesty that you did with the 737 being out the 319 because of its 100 mile great range being more fuel efficient WITHOUT knowing its fuel capacity for that range and comparing that as well. Plus, as you point out...the Airbus has 7 more seats which, again as you state, increases weight and thus reduces range if the fuel to move that additional weight isn't factored in to the totals. To say the 737 is more fuel efficient is a total based on those parameters is disingenuine.
Where Airbus was looking with the A321neo/XLR is the direct replacement for the aging 757 fleet and the airlines who have, had or still desire that capacity and range (TATL is where the ship found its niche on long thin routes after its discontinuation) Airbus wants that market.
What's funny about the total series sales for the two...the Boeing was launched in the 60s and had nigh on 20 years of advance production time over the Airbus. In fact, it was flying in airline service for almost a decade before Airbus even existed. So I'd say Airbus has done on heck of a job to have caught up in a much shorter production time.
As a former ramp rat and as a passenger, while I am a Boeing fan for it being a US product...you cannot beat the Airbus for comfort and ride as well as the qualities it has on the ramp. I HATED seeing a damn 737 on the schedule. Give me the Bombardier regionals, the Douglas/McDonnell Douglas T-tails and the Airbus' all day long. I hated the 737 if I was anything other than the ramp boss and not actively having to work on it.
Bottom line...both are great products regardless of whether a person is a Boeing or Airbus person. Companies have such a complex process for decision making, but it goes well beyond the numbers and in some cases, nationalism plays a roll as well. In the end, how each manufacturer manages to do it, I really don't know. Each airline wants its own specs and tells the builders what they want and what Ryanair and Southwest want may not line up with someone else's need...but who ultimately will the designers listen to? Their sales department. He who has the biggest interest will get most of what they want ultimately and everyone will have to adjust.
That's why the MAX had the issues it has. Southwest Airlines is the cause of that. 100% on the shoulders of them. They demanded the commonality for the pilots and as such, to make the MAX feel like it flies like the NG, they had to put systems in that changed the feel of the plane for them. Problem was, they didn't tell the other airlines of this feature and and as result, the crashes because the system for Southwest was a unspoken "secret."
Boeing should've told all of the airlines operating the 737 MAX about MCAS. It was incredibly foolish and irresponsible of them not to, as MCAS had the potential to cause a plane crash if the sensor it relied on was faulty. It also only relied on 1 sensor, instead of 3, which would've likely prevented both crashes from occuring.
I think you me I am looking at Airbus right now!
Airbus has a better product range with the A320neo variants to meet airline operational requirements compared to the B737 MAX product range.
Technically the max has more of a range max 7, 8, 9, 10 all different lengths. While the neo has 319, 320, and 321.
@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe - The A319neo is similar to the B737-7, the A320neo is similar to the B737-8 and the A321neo is similar to the B737-9/10. Boeing has no product similar to the A321lr/xlr.
@@chrismckellar9350 I guess on the range no. But the xlr is like the 757 lite is not a complete replacement for the 757 but it’s closest thing. That is why Boeing is going for the MMA to be a replacement for the 757 and 767 size aircraft.
@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe - Don't forget Airbus has designs for the stretch version of the A321neo dubbed the 'A322' Airbus is waiting to what Boeing is going to do with their NMA/B797.
@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe Boeing have max 8 and 9 only. let's wait and see how it goes with 7 and 10.
We all don't want to die in the air, so the 737 Max must be avoided.
I doubt airlines would want the 737 max after the 2019 aftermath.. I believe more are ordering the a320 and a321s to from fear of loss of lofe
The A320 is better as the cabin is wider compare to the Boeing. No doubt it is only a few inches but this inches translate to a s few inches on your seat width.
Further you find the cabin a bit roomier than Boeing. Same thing when you compare B787 Vs A350.
true, but 787 doesn’t go against a350, the 777 does
Hooray
Not sure this was a balanced comparison. I'd have had the Max 8 with A320, Max 9 with A321 and Max 10 with the LR or XLR.
Thank you for watching, we appreciate the feedback! ✈️
off course the A320 is the best... the plane always was! and now more now with NEO vs MAX....
#airbusforever
Pretty obvious the one that doesn’t keep crashing and killing all its passengers is best.
the max doesn't keep crashing and keep killing its passengers. that would be more than 2 and it hasn't crashed more than twice
@@nickolliver3021 still it crashed so end
@@wasmiddelsap3379 like all planes do
@@nickolliver3021 neo has had 0 crashes
@@thomasgrabkowski8283 a330 has crashed
I am European so I prefer Airbus.
All I know is the airbus is a foot wider and goes farther I want comfort and don't want to change planes
How can the a320 neo carry more passengers than the 737 max 9, the max 9 is 5 metres longer. You also looked at the max single class pax for the A320 neo and the maximum 2 class paxs for the 737. The 737 max 9 carries 13 more pax at 2 class config.
Obviously I prefer the A320neo, it is so much easier to fly than the 737 MAX. In fact, the A320neo only had 1 hull loss out of nearly 4,000 of them being delivered to airlines. My dad used to work with both Boeing and Airbus aircraft and he said the A320 is better, it is higher off the ground so you don’t bump your head like with a 737.
I like the nose styling of the Boeing
Let's make Airbus the only airframe manufacturer in the world, and you'll feel what it's like to be screwed!
Boeing is main contributor to Airbus success.
@@sinisatrlin840 Let's not forget how Airbus fucked up the A380 when they messed up the unit of measure!
@@bankerdave888 No one died, no one is in jail and they made one of most beutiful birds out there.
@@sinisatrlin840 🤣🤣🤣
@@sinisatrlin840 mate the a380 didn't even break even XD
737 unsafe A320 wins the end.
One that crashed few times due to greedy manufacturers cost benefit analysis deeming human life’s is not important, and another one state of the art, modernized, realizable plane.
737 MAX 7, 737 MAX 8, 737 MAX 9, 737 MAX 10, A319neo, A320neo, A321neo A320VIP, put in time for you.
👍👍👍
Two crashes within such a short period will definitely put a dent in your reputation
ALL INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES ARE REQUESTED TO KINDLY START FLYING TO ATQ , AMRITSAR , INDIA DAILY .
Southwest needs to break this commitment with Boeing and buy Airbus.