Why American and European Airplanes Are So Different
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 10. 2023
- Are American and European airplanes different? Beyond just the architecture and design, what makes them different?
Although Airbus and Boeing are the two largest airplane manufacturers in the world, there are a lot of differences between their planes. In this video, we'll compare Boeing and Airbus planes head-to-head, and discuss the pros and cons of each.
So whether you're a fan of American or European airplanes, this video is a great way to learn more about the differences between the two types. We hope you enjoy learning about the fascinating history and architecture of airline airplanes!
SUBSCRIBE: www.bit.ly/beyondFactsSUB
#boeing
#airbus
#beyondfacts
✈ Love our videos? Join our ‘Paper Pilot Club’ now! Get new videos first, special paper airplanes, and cool badges. 🌟
Click ‘Join’ to be a member and have more fun with us! czcams.com/channels/zgWZmqmKpmsr4oPWITusKA.htmljoin
Sorry, I don't love your videos. Too sensationalist and inaccurate. I'll have to downvote this one.
The A 320 is not an Airbus. It was completely designed by Canadian Bombardier. The only reason Airbus has it is because of corporate incompetency
I think you mean the A220 which is a further development of the Bombardier C series, after Airbus aquired a 50.01% stakeholding of the program.
Wow I love the new 797
@@kimbitschlarsen7095 It is not a further development. The plane was complete and already had orders. Airbus has done nothing. It is just a better plane.
"Chat GPT, halluncinate a 10 minute script outlining the differences between Boeing and Airbus aircraft design"
exactly. I mean it's true to the name: Beyond facts :D
Literally this.
@@davidliu2243 actually that. 😂
Chat GPT: ok ren
love the AI generated video of the "narrator" talking - it's close, but just enough off from the speech that it's extremely noticeable and weird feeling
There is A LOT of inaccuracies and generalisations made with this video. Airbus also uses RR and GE on their planes, and also incorporate winglets. Boeing also uses 4 wheel landing gears like on their 787, 757 and 767s. There's a lot of parallels between the two manufacturers. And in reference to the Comac part, the blended wingtip is more like that of the A350, not 787.
if you saw the thumbnail i hope you saw the inaccuracies and generalisations coming a looong way xD
@@pattos4195 yes the thumbnail is ridiculous 😂
Yeah, and Comac's "cultural symbols" are actually just Chinese translations or actual Chinese names that one would expect on a Chinese airline, but unlikely to found on non-Chinese airlines.
I was about to comment, but I see people already told that.
yeah Ikr? Bro legit put a 747 against a modern airliner. Bro needs to STFU@@pattos4195
This is a 100% AI generated script
and deepfake on the person too
I hate these AI videos
My guess would be a 100% AI **TRANSLATED** script, as it feels like pure CCP propaganda for their mediocre airplane manufacture pet...
I could cope with that, if only it didn't sound like Casey Kasem.
No it's not AI generated.
OMG GUYS, the text that is spoken is LITERALLY from the snippets that ChatGPT generates when you ask it "Can you create a script for a 8 minute video highlighting the differences between modern Airbus and Boeing aircraft?"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Boeing eliminated the 737's eyebrow windows almost 20 years ago except on military versions. Most operators of older 737s have blanked them out to reduce maintenance.
Lots of incorrect and misleading info in this video. Implies that the aircraft manufacturer makes the decisions on liveries and seating configurations. The airlines do that. Virtually no difference in seat size and legroom in economy class on any of the major US and European airlines.
yo bro this vid for npcs for china
even the thumbnail is so wrong
U r 👍💯💯 correct. Wrong information given in video about differences between Boeing and Airbus airplanes designs. Boeing 777 787 don't have wingtip winglets. Nor pointy noses. Interior layouts are decided by customers.
Correct. A.I. trash... all style, no substance. And yeah, Chinese creations.
I was just about to come comment on all that. The video makes is sound as if Boeing and Airbus are running airlines, when they manufacture airplanes to the airline’s requirements
The Boeing 787, 757 and 767 also has 2 sets of 4 wheels, not just the A330. The only Boeing plane to have that six wheel landing gear is the 777.
Don't forget the A350
@@magicaviation2990-1000 variant only, though.
the A350-1000 has triple gear tho
This is an ai channel
Even tho those planes has 2 sets of 4 wheels. You didn't count the gears are tilted differently
Please don’t take these differences seriously.... there are different models of both the airlines... and whatever is mentioned is not correct. E.g. Boeing 787 has 4 main landing gear wheels , even airbus A320 has winglets ( called Sharklets )...
Yeah. this video is highly misleading. Comac didn't borrow anything from the 787. the C919 is a narrowbody made out of aliminuim but the 787 is a widebody made out of composite material.
And airbus use rolls Royce as well
Truly beyond facts
Exactly, there were some misleading information especially about the planes, like the not all boeing have 3 main landing boogeys, in fact, only the 777 has that landing gear in the video. This sort of information wasn't exactly specified so I can totally see someone misunderstanding from this video
Wow wild generalizations, both Airbus and Boeing have used engines from all major manufacturers and most aircraft types have multiple engine options available just as an example the A330 has 4 different engine options from Prat, GE and Rolls and the 747 has had 6 or 7 different engine types from the same manufacturers across its life. This video was done with very little reasearch and seemed to far outweigh Comac as a real competitor. They are less of a real competitor and more on the scale of Embraer or Bombardier but will strugle to get FAA or EASA approval and without that will never take much market share from the giants
Bombardier and Embraer have completely dominated the short-haul sector. Airbus and Boeing aren't even trying to compete with them. With that said, I would imagine that sometime in the future, Bombardier and Embraer will enter the medium-haul market and create competition for Boeing's 737 and Airbus' A320s. Especially if Boeing goes under.
@@incubus_the_manAirbus owns Bombardier.
Before the video revealing Comac, I thought they would talk about Embraer, that is slowly creating bigger aircrafts... Specially the E195-E2
The video is full of "beyond facts", but only as it approaches the end does it really become clear that you've been watching a COMAC ad. The "narrator" you see is artificially generated, along with the narration itself and much of the script. I figure the COMAC part was prepared by the marketing department.
Expect a lot more of this nonsense across many other industries and sectors. Sadly many people will be fooled by such disinformation. The future is bleak.
The company’s building the aircraft do not choose the livery, it’s up to the airlines for that
This is an advertisement of Comac in the disguise of Boeing and Airbus's description.
Yes
1:48 he’s describing how Boeing has winglets but it’s an A321 that’s shown on the screen.
10/10 facts
Absolutely, and the a380plus winglet which doesn't even exist yet
Boeing only has one plane with 6 wheels which is the Boeing 777. Most of Boeing planes have a 4 wheel setup like 767 787 and 757, also when you were talking about the winglets on Boeing planes you showed a Airbus A320 Sharklet.
Did you forget the a350-1000?
@@259er7 I wasn’t talking about airbus?
@pyl19 ah, true my apologies! I also don't believe this video was reviewed by someone with even a little bit of knowledge about aviation. It's almost like the script was written by AI or something.
@@259er7 AI systems aren't stupid enough to make the simple errors whoever wrote this did... For example, yes, the newer (777, 787) Boeings are fly-by-wire, but that's it... The world's most popular Boeing (which is the world's most popular airliner) is the 737, which is NOT. For anyone who is interested, the Cessna 172 is the most produced (number of units) civilian aircraft ever built, at least as of about 2 years ago, and I very seriously doubt that's changed or ever will... Aviation has always been expensive, but in the modern age, it's gone bonkers... Back in the day, you could buy a brand new Cessna for the price of a luxury car or perhaps a bit more. Today even the lowly 172 and it's 110 kt cruise speed costs more than 2 houses!
Can’t believe you completely left out the number 3 comercial airplane builder in the world.
Maybe you simply don’t know about it.
It’s called Embraer.
It’s a Brazilian company
Boeing tried to buy it, but didn’t work.
An AI bot, likely operating out of a content mill in China, shat out this video. Little actual human involvement so it's no surprise it's full of inaccuracies. They also forgot other long-established manufacturers like Bombardier.
@@mlc4495 Bombardier kinda flopped though after Airbus bought the C-Series. The Dash serieses are still holding strong
my man forgot bombardier too
Embraer is overall absolutely not a bad aircraft manufacturer.
They are pretty good. The only thing that is going wrong at the moment, is that some type of their aircraft, (i forgot the type name) is not doing so well at the moment.
But their other types are plane and simple, GOOD.
@@Kirovets7011 You might be referring to the E2 jet lineup, which yes it's certainly not doing well it is a beautiful aircraft and many airlines don't realise that.
So if I see an A380 with 6 wheel bogie's then it is a Boing and if I see a 767 with 4 wheel bogie's then it must be an Airbus, the number of wheels on an aircraft does not tell anyone who made the aircraft much like the number of wheel on a truck doesn't tell anyone who made the truck. The A220 is a Bombardier aircraft which was designed and is built in Canada with a second assembly line in the USA. Also engine manufacturers develop engines then offer them to all aircraft manufactures, so you will find all 3.5 major brands of turbofans on both Boing and Airbus aircraft. Beyond Facts seems to be the correct name for this channel as this video is way Beyond factual and seems rather made up on the spot with little to no research.
🤣
Don't forget, if it's Boeing it must have eyebrow windows
Lol it so true, its like boeing are forced to make planes with 3 boogeys and airbus is limited to 2 boogeys. i loved the way you stated it lol. It makes it so funny!:)
2 vs 6 wheels
It's really wonderful to come across people who freely share valuable information online. You never know what kind of knowledge you might stumble upon that could have a lasting impact on your life.
Don't procrastinate when it comes to saving and investing. Don't wait for the perfect timing; start now because the current moment is the best time to invest.
What specific type of investment are you referring to? I'm aware that making money through investing is not as straightforward as it may appear.
Cryptocurrency trading appears to be quite lucrative. Despite the constantly changing nature of Bitcoin, it's evident that the cryptocurrency community is here to stay. John Joseph, you're doing an excellent job.
I apologize for interrupting, but I have been searching for assistance with this type of trading as my work consumes most of my time, leaving me with limited opportunities to focus on trading. How can I get to know him?
INSTAGRAM
"Beyond Facts" is the perfect name for your channel. During the first 60 seconds of the video, you have already made several untrue statements. Boeing completely changed the design of the nose after the 737 was first flown more than 50 years ago. While the 747's nose must be different due to the second-floor flight deck, the 757, 767, 777 and 787 all have blunt noses similar to Airbus. In addition, only the 777 has triple bogey main landing gear, but you make it sound like all Boeing jets have triple bogeys. 5:48: "European carriers have bigger windows"? Neither Boeing nor Airbus offer a selection of window sizes. Airlines take what they get when ordering planes, when it comes to size of the windows. 6:59: Are you serious when you state COMAC might actually compete with Boeing and Airbus? Their little midrange regional jet is already years behind when it comes to overall design, and so far, the plane under-performs in almost every category. Stop trying to dramatize humdrum factual information. Or at least, get the facts right before you get all dramatic about them.
You had to go and throw in that "little" word to disparage the Chinese airplane. Your comments are downgraded immediately since you can't evaluate the Chinese jet without resorting to emotional irrelevant insults. The point about the C919 is that it's a first entry for a new industry; of course it's not going to compete, its market is the domestic Chinese market. You don't build a commerical aviation industry by attempting to compete with market leaders. Airbus built the 340 for crying out loud simply to get experience with four engine equipment. Embraer and CAe/Bombardier had a similiar stepped cycle. The Chinese are at the beginning of their cycle. You won't catch me on a C919 tho', similarly with anything Russian. And MD equipment made me nervous back in the day.
i competely agree with what you are saying, I would expect CZcamsrs to at least check their facts or just spend 5 minutes learning how to actually identify airplanes,
Thank you for the info! It's really strange to think that you've probably put more effort into this comment than them in the video 😮💨
Speaking for the aviation community, this guy tries but is really lacking. Saying something as general as "if it has 4 wheels it's an airbus. If it has 6 it's a Boeing".
*sees a 757* "oh! 2 wheels. must be an *_airbus._* "
lol, and if there is no eyebrow window, its not a boeing. But what if there isn't an eyebrow but there is a 6 wheeled main gear?
Huge generalisations in the video with numerous inaccuracies. The only reason the 747's cockpit was all the way up there was because the 747 was originally designed as a cargo aircraft. Thus it needed a clean, unobstructed fuselage all the way through from nose to tail. Hence the cockpit was positioned above the fuselage in the famous bubble or hump.
6 wheel MG is only unique to the Trip 7 and the Dreamer not ALL metal. Scimitar winglets are the standard for Max, 900 and some NG craft. The blended winglet is at time craft specific. C919 🤔? Boeing and Airbus have nothing to worry about but market share 😅. Good video.
The 6 wheel MG is only on the 777 and the A350-1000 variant
For me it’s the lateral window shape/angle which differentiates the two
Especially when checking the A330 and 767
funny how you talk about the new Chinese jet and then show a Chinese Boeing 737 please be totally accurate, there is a lot of viewers who can not be fooled and will notice such inaccuracies.
> I thought there’s no Boeing China .. But there’s Airbus China , the manufactory at Tianjin..
Thank you for pointing that out! We apologize for any confusion caused. We'll make sure to be more accurate in our future videos.
@@BeyondFactseverything you said is wrong. Its all misinformation.
Lol hard to be accurate when they use AI generated text to speech and random images from Google.
Or maybe the reason Chinese COMAC went with CFM International engines is to assure they can reverse engineer from as many other countries as possible.
As if European carriers wouldn’t offer Premium Eco, Business and First class…😂
That's because he is american so he only specified this for boeing lol
“And don’t forget the wing tips. Boeing likes to add winglets to many of their models.” Points to example of winglets on an Airbus A320.
You lost me there bro.
I watch planes with all my kids. It takes about an hour for a 5 year old to begin picking out Airbus vs Boeing. It’s not hard enough that you need this video.
I have flown on Boeing and Airbus and both got me there safely. I like how Boeing gives the pilots final say on controlling the aircraft. Americans will take the compact seating for a lower price,, and of course complain about how cramped the seating is. I usually upgrade to Premier seating which gives a few more inches and maybe a glass of wine. I will never fly on a Chinese built aircraft.
Why would you not? Comac is making great strides towards perfection.
@@mauricesaoke943 I wouldn't fly on a Chicom aircraft even if I thought it was safe, which I do not. I will not support that evil regime.
Listen, don't be that offensive to the Chinese@@kevykevTPA
Yeah, traditional carriers like Qantas, Emirates, Qatar, BA and Lufthansa won’t be buying COMAC until they have proven themselves over YEARS especially with the retracting Chinese economy.
As an Aviation enthusiast and one who is studying to become a pilot, aircraft designer/engineer and an air accident investigator, this video has tons of mis leading and even false facts. Other then comparing one with another compare their models as in A320 vs 737, 777 vs A350, 787 vs A330neo, 747 vs A380 etc... Boeing's 737 nose is not less aerodynamic the then A320. Its relatively the same. Airbus has a more rounded nose to increase volume while the 737 is actually nose pointy for aerodynamics. Since these aircrafts fly at subsonic speeds then it doesn't real effect that much between what type of nose an aircraft has. Also please do research more on the landing gear. Not all Airbus have that gear type and not even Boeing. The 777 and A350-1000 have 6 wheel gears. The 757, 767, 787, A330, A340, A350-900 have 4 wheeled gears. There are even some A320 with 4 wheels per main landing gear.....just check facts before posting please.
I love it when we aviation enthusiasts that actually know some stuff will just fill the comments with whats wrong and all. i completely support your point about the nose of the 737
Didn't know someone could say so many wrong things in a single video, truly an accomplishment.
0:38 Pointy nose design is a particularity of just SOME Boeing aircraft, in particular 707, 727 and every generation of 737 (that share the same fuselage design), and one of the reason of the pointiness is that the 707 was initially intended to be narrower but then they decided to make it a bit wider so they had to enlarge the part that merge the cockpit (that was already designed) to the fuselage making the front part of the aircraft to looks like that (and you also have to consider that the knowledge about aerodynamics during the 50s was a bit different that today). But other Boeing aircraft such as the 787 or 757 have a very different design and more a rounded nose shape.
0:50 Boeing have dropped the eyebrow windows decades ago, no more newer aircraft is produced with them and even the ones that were built with them and that now still fly have been mostly converted, so seeing a Boeing aircraft with eyebrow windows today is pretty rare. You also have to consider that other plane manufacturers have used them in the past (in the md-80 for example) making the eyebrow not a recognition element.
0:56 This one makes no sense, the only Boeing aircraft to have that kind of 6-wheel gear is the 777, any other Boeing aircraft does not have that, plus the airbus a350 (specifically the 1000 variant)
also have them so it's not a Boeing peculiarity by any means.
1:23 the Boeing 757 have a tilted 4*2 landing gear pretty similar to the one showed in the video, so no, if you are watching that type of landing gear it doesn't mean that it is an airbus.
1:30 the video is literally comparing the tail of an Airbus a321 and a Boeing 747 that is like twice that size of that, so of course in this particular case the 747 have a bigger tail but that doesn't mean that this is a peculiarity of Boeing, the tail has to be proportioned to meet certain standards and it depends on so many things that I can't even imagine, one of those being the size of the aircraft (the Airbus a380 for example has a massive tail).
1:46 the video literally says that the winglets are a Boeing thing while showing an Airbus with winglets, proving that it is not a Boeing thing. Both Airbus and Boeing uses and have used in the past many different wingtip design, like the blended, scimitar, fence etc... And older aircrafts (many of them still flies today) don't even have them. Also, newer aircrafts like the 787 or the 747 (both from Boeing) don't use any winglet because of the way the wing behave and flex during flight, so saying that Winglets are a Boeing particularity is incorrect, and the winglet design showed in 2:04 is from an aircraft that wasn't even ever produced from airbus (from what I remember the a380 plus was just a prototype).
3:05 Both Airbus and Boeing uses a big variety of engine across their aircrafts, in some cases, they use many different engines for the same aircraft family, like the a320 family that is configured with CFM56, IAE V2500, PW 6000 (a318), plus the CFM Leap and PW1000G for the NEOs variants. The a350 uses Rolls Royce engines (so not just Boeing), and the 757 is used with both RR and PW (so PW is not just for Airbuses). So, there is not a particular engine brand that is used only in Boeing or Airbus but I get that the video intention in this case could have been more of a "they mostly prefer this brand", but still...
3:46 Yes, they both uses FBW systems, so is generally correct, but I want to point out that not every Boeing or Airbus aircraft uses them. In general, every new Airbus aircraft has FBW, just the a300 and a310 weren't FBW (but they are pretty old and rare aircrafts now), while Boeing still build the 737 MAX family without it, they in fact still uses the conventional flight controls being the 737 a pretty old platform now.
3:51 This could mean from everything to nothing, both Airbus and Boeing use A LOT of redundancy for safety reason. While for the automation part, well, I don't know much about newer Boeing aircrafts so I don't perfectly know how Boeing have integrated FBW in their aircrafts, but the fact that Airbus is more focused on automation than Boeing is kind of right, but the reason, at least in my opinion, lies in the fact that Boeing (as I said before) still relies on older platforms (like the 737), and in general Airbus is a much newer brand so they started using the FBW and much automated system almost from the beginning of their history. Also, about the "Fancy Envelope Protection Logic" used by Airbus, that logic is also used by Boeing in the 777 and 787 but by "forcing" the stick the pilot can still override that limit, thing that is not possible in the Airbuses without disabling some features in the cockpit.
4:18 that is probably the only correct part of the video… almost… in fact I have to point out that old Airbus aircrafts (a300 and a310) used to have the Yoke like Boeing.
5:14 This whole part goes into the different airlines seat configuration. I don’t get why is saying that European airliners prefers more space and comfort while American ones prefer to have more passengers. It heavily depends on the airline itself, if you compare Lufthansa to Spirit obviously Lufthansa seats will be more Comfortable in general, but if you consider Ryanair and Delta the situation changes, the whole argument of the video here makes no sense here.
6:04 Same thing, both American and European planes and Airlines can and are configured with more classes (unless you fly on some low cost like Ryanair), and this is NOT a peculiarity of American planes or airlines.
6:45 I don’t even know how to comment this… but, C919 a serious competitor? Yeah… sure… The “Chinese” aircraft with 40% of foreign components imported from US and Europe, with 3/5 of their suppliers based in US and 1/3 in Europe and with American engines… Basically everything that keeps C919 in the air is not from China. I’m not saying that this is not a big accomplishment from China, but building aircrafts and certify them is hard, and Boeing have done this for more than 100 years.
Then the video proceeds in fact to explain similarities of the C919 with its competitors (how strange), and this is not only for the exterior, look at the cockpit of a C919 and an Airbus a350 or a220 for example.
I don’t know what I missed out, but I think this covers pretty much every important part.
Ps: Pls let me know if I made any mistake, so we can avoid spreading misinformation.
It's too early and ambitious for Comac to compete with the big 2 Aircraft Industries. Its still had to compete with smaller ones like Bombardier, Embraer and even Mitsubishi.
Bombardier is Airbus now
@@nettcologne9186- And Mitsubishi, they bought the CRJ program.
ATR
The Comac might be designed in China, but almost all its components, from the engines to the cockpit, are made in the West and imported into China. The only thing "Chinese" about the Comac is that all its Western parts are assembled in China.
A company and B company make their own planes. C company plane is a pile up of western components in a self made fuselage.
I would be very cauteous before boarding a flight on a plane made in China. As with almost every aspect of Chinese manufacturing, their major downfall is the lack of quality control.
Boeing 737 I rest my case
12000 737’s in service I rest my case
I rest their case
A bluetuth device is a conected successfully
then don't travel most planes are manufactured in china airbus Boeing have manufacturing facility in china
literally airbus A330,A350,A380 use rolls royace engines aswell as A320s
Surprisingly, the first six-wheel landing gear was developed by Boeing was actually deeply modified soviet Tupolev Tu-154 landing gear, because Boeing didn't use such before and soviet engineers were good at making multi-axis gear due to low-end runways.
Man could you imagine if the Russians and us started working together and Kennedy didn't get asassinated
@@bongwelll Russians and US were working together and that collaboration was sick. But as it ended they started the cold war...
atleast not tu-104.
I love how you said in the pic for the vid that Qantas is American
The A350-1000 also has 3 wheel bogies too.
Is it just me or is the thumbnail a380 look like a c17
Okay, Airbus doesn’t only have 4 wheel landing gear. Take the A350-1000 which has 3 pairs of landing gear on each side as the Boeing 777. As well as the a380!
COMAC is not blended wing body. It's big fillets/sponsons under the wing root for the landing gear.
those are called winglets, they serve an important purpose besides the efficiency, they direct lightning strikes towards them, keeping the pilots, crew, and passengers safe
On Airbus they are called Sharklets which is pretty cool
Actually, they are there to reduce induced drag by preventing the high pressure air under the wing from sneaking around the edge into the low pressure area above it. I haven't a clue if they attract lightning, which isn't all that dangerous to a modern jet anyway (this little thing called grounding has something to do with that), but if so, it's a happy accident. Not at all why they were invented in the first place.
The artwork and labels displayed on the outside of the planes have little to do with the manufacture and more to do with the airline's logos and color theme that ordered them from the manufacture 7:46 That plane has "Chinese symbols" on it because it is being flown and operated by a company inside China. If that Chinese manufacture starts contracting and selling those planes on an international level the graphic designs will vary depending on what airlines contract with them.
Maybe The Third One Is Mcdonell Douglas
*Sadly They Retired*
It's absorbed by Boeing.
An interesting thing I noticed about the end of the vid. The PPG logo on the front windscreen. Am sure our US friends, particularly in Pittsburg, would recognize that one!
FBW system in Airbus was one of the factors why Air France 447 has crashed. Captain taking control over first officer couldn't override with his inputs when first officer was still controling the stick despite commands given to let it go.
its so funny that the thumbnail for the video has an American flag at the 747 even though you can literally see a part of Qantas, Spirit Of Australia 😂
Boeing, Airbus, doesn't really make that much difference to a non-pilot person like myself. But what matters besides comfort level, leg room, and service quality is to get me from point A to point B safely and without the plane falling apart. As for the paint on the airframe, or the language on signs, it doesn't really matter.
Airbus has more seat comfort, leg room etc
@@CW-rx2js No, the AIRLINE does, based on the configuration they pick. If an airline said "Can you configure it for just 30 seats?" either maker would say no? Of course, picking something not in the catalog might cost a bit extra, but everything in a plane sale is negotiated. Seat materials, colors, carpet, in cabin entertainment.
@@CW-rx2js that depends on the airline and the class
Btw the Qantas is a Australian Plane
It literally says Spirit of Autralia on the side of the plane
i thought the 3rd one was mcdonnell douglas but i forgot its way older
"all boeing planes have 6 landing gear"
737 has left the chat
727?
yeah aswell as the 717@@pixeIplayer2
Where did you get all this information? It's just so I don't ever use that source, because the video is full of misinformation of all kinds.
Listen everyone, if you want to know facts about aviation or planes, go check out a channel specialized in aviation, otherwise you are very likely to be misinformed.
lmao in the video i saw american has no fhight entertainment but delta has lots of movies
It's an ai video
You described the exterior paint schemes as a difference between Airbus / Boeing and Comac. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the paint designs determined by the airlines and not the manufacturer?
It is the customer who choses which engines they want fitted, same for the interior design of aircraft cabins.
I see a lot of the Boeing 757 on the outside look of the nose on that new Chinese plane
In the thumbnail it has Qantas and Qantas isn’t American it’s Australian
the thumbnail means the aircraft manufacturer not airline that is flying it.
Actually COMAC are making their own engines (still in development) called the CJ1000 so the C919s would eventually become fully made in china but we don't know how many more years it will take for the CJ1000 to be launched
1:26 the boeing 747, 757, 767 and 787 also have 4 landing gears.
The talking head shots with a microphone which is not connected and the ADR voice killed me XD Great video nonetheless.
I always love Boeing, even am in Europe
you forgot to add that the window size of Airbus planes tend to me smaller than those of Boeing. The A318/19/20/21 windows are quite small compared to a '37, or '57 or MD80's
The landing gear is different on almost every plane so the 6 wheel for boeing and the 4 wheel for airbus isn't always true.
The "facts" given in this video almost felt insulting for aviation. The set of wheels alone was a big no no and comparing a single aisle vertical stabilizer to a two deck makes no sense.
Lots of inaccuracies. Won't recommend for anyone who want to learn about airplanes.
There are only a handful of aviation related videos that I couldn't watch to the end. This is one of them.
He forgot the 757, 767, 747 and the A350-1000 when talking about wheels. He also forgot every sharkelts A320s… the PWW4000s, 2000s… and the CFM
I know this is off topic but I realize that in trucks American and European have also different styles.
I remember there's also a video comparing those trucks.
isnt that the europe vs america regulations???
I hope comac's planes aren't made out of plastic 😬
I always pick if Airbus or Boeing, by the cockpit side rear windows. The Airbus ones have the top rear corner clipped.
Embraer: Am I a joke to you?
So many infos are wrong here...
Definitely Beyond Facts... it outright misinterpreted misinformation 😅
for real
All aircraft new types should have of engineer operator underneath aircraft of engine operation during starting and turn off. Included of Boeing 737 Max, 777X and Airbus A220, A320 Neo, A330 Neo, and A350XWB have the two engine operators for 2 engine operations in control room under aircraft (1 engine will be worked by 1 engine operator). Exception for turboprop engine included ATR 42 & 72 and Dash 7 and 8, it's only by 1 engine operator. For Boeing 747-8 and Airbus A380 in 4 engines, it's worked by 2 engine operators (2 engines for controlling by 1 operator. The engine operators will be informed by 2 pilots before flight of plane it.
Source: ICAO, Boeing, and Airbus
B737NG and A320neo and prior neo have similar winglets/sharklets.
Get your Homework done
Good video sir! But don't forget the Embraer, a Brazilian company
Ended up as Comac promo video... Embraer and Bombardier were on the International market before Comac came around, I don't know if Comac even has any international sales yet.
Regarding engines, traditionally the customer, i.e. the airline, selects the engine for any specific type. This leads to a great deal of overlap between Boeing and Airbus.
The research on this video was done like hollywood producers when they make an aviation movie. It's basically taking the subject lines of the results of their googles search.
As a person that has worked on both manufacturer types, I can safely say this guy is talking s#!*. Also, when it comes to engines, it's usually the owner of the aircraft that decides which engines to go for, which that aircraft can take or designed for. Usually a minimum of two Engine Manufacturers.
written and produced by someone that really knows nothing about airplanes. @5:48 he says that European AIRLINES go with bigger windows, it is the manufacturer that makes the decision of the size of the windows not the carrier. As a point of reference Airbus tends to have smaller windows than the Boeing counterparts
What about Embraer? Brazilian manufacturer.
True and they are already there in the market with a couple 1000 aircraft orders. I doubt the COMAC will get these numbers.....outside of China and or Russia.
bankrupt
what do you mean bankrupt? theyre still making e190s, etc. @@KrishnaGupta-oq4fo
The FBW philosophy is pretty significant. Boeing anticipates a qualified airman in command. Airbus anticipates a very diff level of competency
1:01 the only boeing to have the 6 landing gears is the 777, the a350-1000 and the a380 also have the triple gears.
and 747
@@AIien_Gaming nope, the 747 has 4 landing gears in each column.
oh sorry I realized that… I got the landing gear of the 747 and a380 mixed up@@tacocatzzz
This is the most Americanised video I've seen on aircrafts. "Once you're inside you're surrounded by Chinese motifs, giving you a strong sense of cultural identity and national pride" ...no it's because it's their language, of course they're going to use it! 💀 Also it's airlines that choose their liveries, not the manufacturer...
Once you’re inside an American aircraft you’re surrounded by American motifs…..Big-Mac eating Karens.
AI is weird
LOL the over voice, I didn't think it was dubbed for that guy in the cut scene
I would never ride a Chinese airplane everybody knows that it's all homemade and every pilot graduated from a youtube tutorial
As a passenger, I prefer Airbus than Boeing, it just more comfortable.
As a Ex-ground staff, also prefer Airbus, door is much easier to operate
Are you an A.I?
I have heard American airline passengers who have made many trips abroad and some of them who have flown regularly to Europe have said that they actually prefer to fly with a European airline such as BA, KLM, Air France or Lufthansa as opposed to American, United or Delta because they feel that they offer much better value for money than the North American airlines.
I thought this was called beyond facts. This is not a blended wing body design at 7:23. A blended wing design is on some thing like the airbus maverick or the b-21 raider.
How boring and simplistic, with some wrong facts. Awful commentary. Which manufacturer murdered 346 innocent people? Boeing.
way more actually, tenerife and jal 123 added onto it which will be about 1 thousand including other crashes. crazy
Tenerife was not boeings fault. both of you are putting the blame on Boeing when most of the crashes you've named are to do with pilot error. (Other than MAX MCAS)
They were different in the past, when there were lots of airplane builders in the industry. Today most airplanes look exactly the same: a tube with two engines. Maybe civil aviation buffs may spot subtle differences between Airbus and Boeing, but to the regular Joe like me the only external difference is their size, and the livery of the airlines operating them.
Correction: Almost all Airbus you see is completely fly by wire, but not for Boeing, only the 787 and 777x is fly by wire and the 737 max is partially fly by wire (the spoilers) all the rest of the Boeing aircrafts are non fbw.
There is one thing said that was very accurate and that is the US major airlines dont think passengers require leg room. If you want legroom you can damn well pay extra for it.
Simple they are designed by different people, who have different priorities, despite their intended usage being the same. This is like asking why a Ford Pinto was so different from a Volkswagen golf. which were designed for the same purpose.
"You can spot a Boeing by those trademark eyebrow windows above the cockpit"
*laughs in Tupolev*
As for Chinese a.c. The tag made in China says it all. I haven't to explain it any further.
If i am the CEO of an airliner company which are on the brink of a big airliner order i would firstly do some homework about the safety history of the variants which have to bring pass save and sound to their destinations. Secondly i will do some homework about their fuel efficiency and economics. Where these two factors meet, this will be the plane to order.
I must say that I prefer the Airbus cockpit colour of the dark grey almost blue compared to Boeing's beige brown colour.
It's a little bit more smarter and more clinical looking.
WHAT THE HELL IS THAT! THE WHEEL THING IS SOOO WRONG
Just for the record: The only Boeing airplane with a 6 wheel landing gear is the 777. There were too many other inaccuracies to cover today.
you are off base on the dual truck vs triple truck landing gear.......All depends on model of aircraft.