“ARMIES OF THE WORLD - THE SOVIET ARMY - ARMOR” 1955 SOVIET T-34 TANKS AND ARMORED VEHICLES XD61374

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 10. 2022
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @periscopefilm
    Want to learn more about Periscope Film and get access to exclusive swag? Join us on Patreon. Visit / periscopefilm
    Visit our website www.PeriscopeFilm.com
    This black and white Cold War era indoctrination war film titled “The Soviet Army / Armor” was produced in 1955 by the United States War Office as part of two larger series, "Armies of the World" and a subseries "The Soviet Army", both of which provided Army and reserve units a more holistic picture of the Soviet Union’s capabilities and tactics. The film provides an overview of the Soviet Union’s armored vehicle divisions, and starts with a brief history of Soviet armor production from the 1930’s to 1945. Using both Soviet and German training footage, the film mainly focuses on the Soviet flagship tank, the T-34, outlining its strengths, weaknesses, and its role in Soviet tactics. The film concludes with a brief description of the Soviet armored vehicles showcased in the Moscow Victory Parade of 1945, featuring the new Soviet JS-3/IS-3 tanks.
    Card with scrolling text describing the role of tanks and armor in the Soviet Army (:25). Demonstration of the capabilities of Soviet tanks, including their ability to traverse difficult terrain and obstacles, withstand explosives, and operate in coordinated war efforts (:53). Early Soviet experimentation with light armored “tankettes” (2:35). Footage of Soviet T-60 tanks traversing various terrain (3:13). Footage of Soviet KV or Kliment Voroshilov series tanks, including the KV-2 and KV-76 (3:37). A Soviet Marshall, most likely Marshall Semyon Budyonny, speaking at the Soviet Armor School (4:24). Soviet tank factories producing and testing tanks (4:53). Soviet T-34 tanks traveling through varied terrain (5:25). Footage of Soviet T-34 tank, including an interior shot and demonstration of its mounted weapons (6:06). Soviet BA-64 armored scout car (6:23). Soviet T-34 tanks rolling into combat and firing weapons alongside infantry (6:31). Demonstration of buried Soviet tank tactics (7:06). Combat footage of Soviet T-34 tanks (7:21). Soviet tanks traversing heavy snow alongside infantry (8:04). Soviet T-34 leaving pit for assault (8:38). Possible footage of Soviet tank scouting tactics (8:55). Footage of Soviet tanks and infantry in snow (9:10). Footage of Soviet self-propelled 122mm Howitzer (9:58). German World War 2 training films demonstrating the anatomical weaknesses of the Soviet T-34 tanks (10:14). German World War 2 training footage of anti-tank maneuvers, German tank hunters, Panzerfaust effectiveness, and other German anti tank guns (12:49). German World War 2 footage of German infantry inspecting a destroyed Soviet JS-1 tank (17:27). Soviet armored train transporting Soviet tanks (18:05). Footage of the 1945 Victory Parade in Moscow's Red Square, featuring Soviet tanks and ‘tankists’ (18:18). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring motorcycles mounted with 7.62 light machine guns (18:34). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring 6x6 ‘armored transporters’ (18:57). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring SU-76 armored self-propelled 76mm guns (19:21). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring T-34 tanks mounted with 85mm guns (19:39). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring SU-100 armored self-propelled 100mm guns (20:41). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring JSU-152 armored self-propelled 152mm gun howitzers (20:58). Continued footage of the Victory Parade featuring Soviet JS-3 tanks mounted with 122mm guns (21:51). Continued footage of the Victory Parade with shots of various tanks and armored vehicles (22:48). Card with text advertising “Department of the Army Handbooks” (23:31).
    We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com

Komentáře • 152

  • @khrystree9233
    @khrystree9233 Před 9 měsíci +1

    Love Periscope Films work 🤩

  • @vladmalkov9391
    @vladmalkov9391 Před rokem +16

    The only issue with this movie that it shows the state of affairs of the Soviet armor as it used to be at the end of 1945. The movie, itself, was made in 1955, thus, it was outdated by 10 years! None of shown BT or KV tanks were any longer in service. At the same time, the most important Soviet T-54 tank which had been mass-produced since 1946 is totally missing.

  • @mariaekman13
    @mariaekman13 Před rokem +15

    This is a GEM ! 😃

    • @PeriscopeFilm
      @PeriscopeFilm  Před rokem +9

      Glad you saw it and appreciate it -- and yes, glad we found it! This one was rescued from a dumpster at a U.S. Army base.
      Love our channel? Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.

    • @aussiejezza
      @aussiejezza Před rokem

      @@PeriscopeFilm well done, saving a great piece cold war history, you should send it to Bovington Tank musem

  • @WhiteBriar
    @WhiteBriar Před rokem +4

    KV-1 was a decent tank. Legendary in the USSR.

  • @matovicmmilan
    @matovicmmilan Před rokem +2

    Great video!

    • @PeriscopeFilm
      @PeriscopeFilm  Před rokem

      Glad you enjoyed it. Love our channel? Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.

  • @philipinchina
    @philipinchina Před rokem +23

    I joined the British Army in 1973. This is what we were facing. Wonderful content. Thank you.

    • @jasonkeighin9401
      @jasonkeighin9401 Před rokem +1

      You didn't get sent to the desert in 73? Figured the crown was more worried about the horsemen in the sandbox, than cossacks in siberia at that time.

    • @philipinchina
      @philipinchina Před rokem +5

      @@jasonkeighin9401 No British Army on the Rhine. We were worried about the Soviet and satellite states coming through East Germany and just keep going!

    • @alangordon3283
      @alangordon3283 Před rokem +1

      @@jasonkeighin9401 what are you gibbering about

    • @yanikkunitsin1466
      @yanikkunitsin1466 Před rokem +7

      You were facing T-34's in 1973? Cool story, bro

    • @philipinchina
      @philipinchina Před rokem +2

      @@yanikkunitsin1466 Some of the satellite countries were running T 34s later than you might imagine. I never faced them as there was no war!

  • @antonsorokin3881
    @antonsorokin3881 Před rokem +8

    "КВ-76" и "КВ-85" - не совсем корректные названия. В качестве КВ-76 показан танк КВ-1. А вот КВ-85 существовал, но выпущен только малой партией, и потом модернизирован до ИС

    • @user-kq1zk8np6i
      @user-kq1zk8np6i Před rokem +2

      Ну это как первую модель Т-34 иногда называют Т-34-76, хотя она так не звалась.

  • @aussiejezza
    @aussiejezza Před rokem +6

    t54/t55: "wait till they get load of me"

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 Před rokem +2

      The T54 had been in production for five years before this film was produced - thousands were already in Soviet armoured divisions. Its amzing the film passes over it as it was the tank the film's audience were most likely to face. All the weak points they pointed to in this film did not actually exist in the T-54. Though the film failed to point out the worst weakness of all Soviet tanks, right up to the T-90 - truly terrible ergonomics that meant low rate of fire, low range and extremely low crew endurance.

    • @barkingmonkee
      @barkingmonkee Před rokem +5

      @@kenoliver8913 Not actually amazing since, despite the T-54 being present in many Soviet armored formations as you said, the west didn't know about it until it was used to suppress the Hungarian uprising in 1956.

    • @aussiejezza
      @aussiejezza Před rokem

      @@kenoliver8913 soviets had good security on hiding new tanks from Western spys and no satellites yet

  • @user-gg1se7fx2b
    @user-gg1se7fx2b Před rokem +27

    4:37 Чёрт, это же зал Бронетанковой академии в Москве (Екатерининский дворец ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Екатерининский_дворец_(Москва)_ )! Здание ныне заброшено! Спасибо за ценные кадры!

    • @larrybarger1077
      @larrybarger1077 Před rokem +5

      sad to think her palace abandoned. history must be preserved

    • @DENCSER
      @DENCSER Před rokem

      С какого перепуга оно заброшено? Чего ты пи..дишь?

    • @user-gg1se7fx2b
      @user-gg1se7fx2b Před rokem

      @@DENCSER , сходи, убедись сам

    • @Ms2ks
      @Ms2ks Před rokem +2

      Здание не заброшено! Что за охинею ты несёшь?!

  • @peterdemonov1199
    @peterdemonov1199 Před rokem +13

    Спасибо тебе друг за фильм!

  • @christopherandersson2496

    whats the name of the narator?. Perfect film

  • @JimCampbell777
    @JimCampbell777 Před rokem +3

    Still being used in the Ukraine to this very day!

    • @domino051970
      @domino051970 Před rokem

      I heard about the only case when a T-34/85. a former monument in Ukraine, was returned to working condition for use in combat actions.

  • @henryfriedel3984
    @henryfriedel3984 Před rokem +2

    That running clock is absolutely annoying

    • @friedyzostas9998
      @friedyzostas9998 Před rokem

      cry about it lmao

    • @PeriscopeFilm
      @PeriscopeFilm  Před rokem +1

      Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes.
      In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous CZcams users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do.
      Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.

  • @dleechristy
    @dleechristy Před rokem +29

    The narrator dismisses the uber "slow" KV and then adds that in WW2 the tankers were "well saturated with political doctrine to make them well oriented tools of the communist state..." as he ironically delivers well saturated propaganda himself to his young Army captive audience... Of course when one is INSIDE either system, one doesn't notice the 24/7 propaganda without taking a step back and knowing a bit more. In a sense, we've all been trained as TOOLS from an early age.. In the cold war, we watched cartoons with the evil Boris and Natascha in childhood and until the 1990s, their women were presented as thick old brutes on tractors. It's laughable when one looks back. --- Of course there are lies still being swallowed by even educated people today because the lifetime of propaganda prepared them for this new batch now.

    • @denarte6986
      @denarte6986 Před rokem +2

      The big difference being that until fall of the Soviet Union and later when internet became widespread you could not really see for yourself so people ended up believing in stereotypes. Now you can take out your phone go to Chatroulette and speak with any person from any country you wish

  • @steveosborne2297
    @steveosborne2297 Před rokem +48

    I love that statement overloaded and poorly maintained , it sounds like 2022

    • @boerekable
      @boerekable Před rokem +12

      But Soviet Union was bigger and their technology was more on par with Western stuff than todays Russia.

    • @a.t6066
      @a.t6066 Před rokem +13

      @boerekable in terms of tanks, ussr actually outmatched western vehicles by far until the mid late 80s

    • @boerekable
      @boerekable Před rokem

      @@a.t6066 Easily disproven by for example Yom-Kippur war. Soviet Union later claimed they delivered just monkey models to their Arab partners which was obviously BS, but a lot of people bought it at the time.
      But of course they were as easy to destroy as today, and Soviet Union could have replenished their stocks.

    • @a.t6066
      @a.t6066 Před rokem +7

      @boerekable they did deliver monkey models. Where were the t-72s, t-64, and t-10 during the Yom yippur war? Thats right, they weren't there. t-55s, t-62s, and is-3s werent exactly the newest tanks at the time...

    • @boerekable
      @boerekable Před rokem +10

      @@a.t6066 The USSR was in military technology wise on par with the Western nations up until the early 80s. To say though the Western powers had no tank which could match the t-72 is just ridiculous.

  • @user-wv6dx5um8u
    @user-wv6dx5um8u Před rokem +2

    Ведь от тайги до британских морей
    Красная Армия всех сильней!

  • @richardhartley7266
    @richardhartley7266 Před rokem +1

    Is this footage from Ukraine 2022? 😉

  • @kennethjohnson9370
    @kennethjohnson9370 Před rokem +12

    I can tell you one thing the Soviet Union army was a force to be reckoned with during WW2 they beat the German Army led by Stalin it still a cool episode showing the evolution of the Russian armor

    • @charles1964
      @charles1964 Před rokem +4

      Led by Stalin, Fed by Lend Lease

    • @CreatingAlong
      @CreatingAlong Před rokem +2

      Yeah by sending nearly 10 million under equipped cannon fodder soldiers to the front.

    • @danstinson7687
      @danstinson7687 Před rokem +2

      Propped up by FDR's supply lines to Vladivostok and the duped "western democracies" draining off German divisions so the world's most crazed madman (friendly Uncle Joe) could spread his horrors over even more conquered peoples.

    • @sincereflowers3218
      @sincereflowers3218 Před rokem +1

      @@CreatingAlong and then arresting whoever survived

    • @hello-rq8kf
      @hello-rq8kf Před rokem

      @@CreatingAlong so? they won

  • @Dmitriy_Pivko
    @Dmitriy_Pivko Před rokem +10

    От тайги до Британских морей,
    Красная армия - всех сильней!
    Song, written by P. Gorinshtein

  • @charlesodonnell2993
    @charlesodonnell2993 Před rokem +7

    I trained and led anti-tank hunterkiller teams post Vietnam War. Essentially we trained using the same tactics the Germans used during WW2, both different by having more modern antitank weapons - and the same using the old weapons too. Tanks burn.

    • @imadequate3376
      @imadequate3376 Před rokem +2

      @paladin danse almost all war time production T34s were junk.
      Rushed production lead to heat treat to 600 bernell while everyone else was 300-400 this lead to the tanks hulls cracking and or devastating amounts of spall killing the crew, some rounds wouldn't even penetrate because the armor was so hard but it would still crack the hull.
      Russians didn't install radios in all their tanks until like 1943 or 44.
      They were just good enough and numerous enough.

    • @dleechristy
      @dleechristy Před rokem +7

      NATO was heavily reliant on the Wehrmacht. Postwar, to weaken the other side, we relied on the most sadistic genocidal war criminals (US Army Intelligence words) from western Ukraine to keep the idea of "Ukraine" as a separate nation alive. We harbored them in eastern American cities (and a few in west Germany and England) and shielded them from prosecution. Guess it all paid off decades later with the situation today...

    • @hasanhaskovic4307
      @hasanhaskovic4307 Před rokem

      @@dleechristy as if Ukraine aka the Kievan Rus haven't been a separate nation forever lol

    • @dleechristy
      @dleechristy Před rokem +4

      @@hasanhaskovic4307 Yes Rus, you fail, Ukraine is a modern invention, areas occupied by Catholic Poland and Austria for too long

    • @richieincident3613
      @richieincident3613 Před rokem +5

      @@hasanhaskovic4307 Why are you lying? "Kievan Rus" is a historical term coined in the 19th century. Rus is Russia on all maps

  • @mikefrench882
    @mikefrench882 Před rokem

    Did that narrator just disrespect a lend/lease Universal Carrier? Makes me so angry I can hardly see out of my eyes...

    • @vladmalkov9391
      @vladmalkov9391 Před rokem

      Totally agree! And where is the spectacular British Mark V tank (1918)? Why is it not shown? Soviets captured a few of those during their Civil War.

  • @jojor9766
    @jojor9766 Před rokem +3

    Someone needs to get this film to the Ukrainian army so that they will know what they need to do when Russia sends their last wave of armor against them. I assume that none of the WWI tanks have survived.

    • @AnteCashovina
      @AnteCashovina Před rokem +2

      you mean when ukraine sends the donated t55s from slovenia against russia, i see some still belive ukraine is winning , dear lord...

    • @jojor9766
      @jojor9766 Před rokem

      You need to be very careful when you discuss Soviet junk. You can't depend solely on the top line figure. For instance, when Russia sent the T 62s into combat oh those many months ago, they were the M variant which was the last variant. Why these relics did not have reactive armor they at least had some composite armor. This at least put them nearly on par with their T 72 A replacements. The T 55s to which you refer are not something that I would care to get into but are a modernized version of that tank type that has modern features such as reactive armor which makes them much more survivable than any T62 known to man. There is no indication that Ukraine has actually used these in combat. They may be using them for rear guard action such as guarding check points or as some sort of emergency reserve if things do get desperate. Another good example of being careful about evaluating Soviet/Russian junk types is the T 80. While i came after the T72 in introduction it was discontinued, and Russia went back to making T 72s as their main battle tank. So, there are T 72 variants that have superior features to T 80s. If you want some real laughs, Russia has been seen to be sending some T 62 As to Ukraine. This may not be too bad if they are kept in rear area roles but taking one of these museum pieces into battle would be suicidal. Not only do they lack reactive armor, but they also lack any composite armor. Basically, they really are little more than the T 55s for which you rightly have no respect. They are simply rolled steel tanks like you would find on any WWII battlefield.

    • @Internetbutthurt
      @Internetbutthurt Před rokem +2

      You are clearly brainwashed. The Ukrainian army is getting slaughtered and without Western donations they would not have an army left. Russians havent lost that many tanks, especially since April.

    • @paulwilson8061
      @paulwilson8061 Před rokem

      👆🤡

    • @jojor9766
      @jojor9766 Před rokem

      Ah. Nothing like orc eloquence. When faced with facts, they present the middle finger. This may explain their great battlefield exploits in this war. You must be an orc commander of some sort.

  • @jim7544
    @jim7544 Před rokem +12

    "The KV-1was an easy target ". Nope. Maybe easy to hit, but not to knock out!

    • @robertsansone1680
      @robertsansone1680 Před rokem +3

      I recommend the book, "Hitler Moves East" by Paul Carrel. (I may have spelled the name wrong) In one of the first encounters with a KV-1, a KV was blocking a road in front of a bridge. The Germans kept firing their 37mm AT guns at it to no effect. The Germans nicknamed the 37mm "The Door knocker" about this time. They had to bring up an 88mm to destroy the KV. When they went up to the knocked out KV, they counted 72 37mm rounds stuck in its armor.

    • @dleechristy
      @dleechristy Před rokem +4

      Propaganda --- But note the narrator talking about their tank training being "communist" propaganda. Ironic as he was spewing nonsense like this

    • @darrenprong2632
      @darrenprong2632 Před rokem

      You dont have to pen the armor to knock a tank out though. This whole film is testament to that.
      Everyone cites the example of that one KV that withstood the 37mm, not realizing that the tank was already immobilzed and near useless. You dont want to be in ANY vehicle that has been hit 72 times and has infantry crawling all over it.
      KV did what it was supposed to do, as did the T-34...that being cheap and expendable.

    • @robertsansone1680
      @robertsansone1680 Před rokem +2

      @@darrenprong2632 I suspect that the KV that "just stood there" had a crew that wouldn't retreat because of draconian "no retreat" orders. "You have little chance with the Germans & none with us". I highly recommend Mark Feltons "KV-1 Last Stand Leningrad". Four KVs knocked out fourty three German panzers that were trapped on a causeway. All the KVs survived. The lead KV took 156 hits "without being disabled or penetrated". This, of course was in 1941 & things would change. I would send a link but am to stupid to know how. It is very interesting & only about 10 minutes long.

    • @robertsansone1680
      @robertsansone1680 Před rokem

      @@darrenprong2632 Actually, it's only 5 minutes long. I just Googled it. It's highly interesting. "Mark Felton KV-1 Last Stand Leningrad". I'll leave you be. Have fun.

  • @jaimieoxford8212
    @jaimieoxford8212 Před rokem +3

    "Quantity is a quality all of it's own." Josef Stalin

    • @dianapuskina3448
      @dianapuskina3448 Před rokem +2

      Actually (c)wilhelm hegel and he was german.

    • @jaimieoxford8212
      @jaimieoxford8212 Před rokem

      @@dianapuskina3448 Then the Germans didn't take that piece of advice to heart.

    • @dianapuskina3448
      @dianapuskina3448 Před rokem

      That was so nice of them. Because if they did nobody would know who is stalin and everybody would speak german

  • @pretziboy4162
    @pretziboy4162 Před rokem +7

    Invincible or not the still won ww2

    • @PrimarchX
      @PrimarchX Před rokem

      What we don't see here is all the Allied food, ammo, explosives, gas and trucks fueling that victory.

    • @supernovaexpress5241
      @supernovaexpress5241 Před rokem +3

      @@PrimarchX Either way.. Without Soviet Manpower the U.S would of struggled fighting against both Japan and the Germans. Soviets lost more than 20 Million people in order to defeat the Nazis. I have huge respect for them.

    • @PrimarchX
      @PrimarchX Před rokem +1

      @@supernovaexpress5241 Yes, we hear that frequently. However it needs to also be told that their victory would not of been possible without Allied support. Sort of like recognizing the French for their support of the American Revolution. However we historically don't hear that recognition due to political bias or lack of knowledge.

    • @supernovaexpress5241
      @supernovaexpress5241 Před rokem +1

      @@PrimarchX Of course I'm not denying the fact that support was needed to defeat the Germans. Just that the Soviets put in the most effort into defeating them.

    • @jojomaster7675
      @jojomaster7675 Před rokem

      @@PrimarchX Fuel and trucks certainly, but I doubt the foor or ammo contributons were that significant. Especially the ammo. The russians used completely different ammo to any of the western allies.

  • @Doodlesthegreat
    @Doodlesthegreat Před rokem +9

    And then we discovered their armor had a serious weakness: Ukranian farmers.

    • @NINE93THREE
      @NINE93THREE Před rokem +5

      NATO Advisors and Western Technology instead of farmers, but yes.

    • @hello-rq8kf
      @hello-rq8kf Před rokem +5

      Z

    • @brucewelty7684
      @brucewelty7684 Před rokem +2

      At least the Ruskie tanks have the cook off process perfected.

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman Před rokem

      you wish. more like american military contractors arming nazis.

    • @dleechristy
      @dleechristy Před rokem +2

      Ukrainian farmers fought for the Red Army. However western Ukrainian nationalists allied with Nazis to kill partisans and Jews, and then after the SS and Abwehr were destroyed, found a new sponsor in the USA.

  • @AlternityGM
    @AlternityGM Před rokem +1

    Soviet military strategy relied on a war of attrition. USSR had the numbers. It can work but can mean large losses in men & material. Today however it seems Russia suffers from low morale, poor training & corruption.

    • @user-ik3uw3ou3t
      @user-ik3uw3ou3t Před rokem

      Corruption is not a Russian invention. Just look at the American system of lobbying and you'll understand that the Russian corruption is a miserable resemblance to that in the USA. Everyone knows that. Moreover, this fact is willingly recognized all over the world. Russians will never catch with America in this sphere! It's next to impossible!

    • @jd-if2fe
      @jd-if2fe Před rokem

      War of attrition like the NVA

  • @jamebrooke894
    @jamebrooke894 Před rokem +5

    Same tanks used in War against Ukraine?

    • @dimitri_kirman
      @dimitri_kirman Před rokem +8

      Of course not! Using this tanks in modern war is equal using a muskets and swords!
      Well, I heard about some really old tanks used by DNR/LNR forces in middle 10s, but in that time they have been non-regular forces. Today this situation will be ridiculous.

    • @Scrap_Lootaz
      @Scrap_Lootaz Před rokem +4

      Several T-34s and ISs launched from monuments/pedestals were used by the People's Militia of the DPR and LPR in 2014-15, and were returned back as soon as better equipment appeared.

    • @paulwilson8061
      @paulwilson8061 Před rokem +3

      Ukr will use t 55 from Slovakia

    • @dimitri_kirman
      @dimitri_kirman Před rokem +1

      @@paulwilson8061 Yes, but you must understand - this is a full and deeply upgraded machines - and after full modern diagnosis and repair.

  • @alexanderx33
    @alexanderx33 Před rokem +2

    Idk if I could attack a soviet tank. They're commander is a blonde loli.

  • @liscbezkozery3705
    @liscbezkozery3705 Před rokem +5

    This are litellary german POVs lies.

  • @asifimam88
    @asifimam88 Před rokem +7

    US lying back then

    • @dleechristy
      @dleechristy Před rokem +1

      You think they will ever tell you the truth about their regime change antics in Ukraine??? They took over from the Nazi Abwehr when that went kaput and followed through all the way to financing the coup in Kiev that brought the instant potentially world ending mess. Look up Operation Aerodynamic and the Dulles brothers to start, the Schutzmannschaft Battalion 201, the Ukrainian Nachtigall Battalion and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists.