Get educated. That guy in GA was passed out drunk right in the middle of an active drive thru - cops don’t call you an Uber for that; they rightfully take you to jail. Police responded to a call from the public about the situation and did not just happen upon him as the media would have you believe. That guy panicked because he was on parole and a DUI conviction sends him back to the slammer.
Did it warrant 2 shots in the back though is the question? They had his car and all his info already. He was going back to jail no matter what. Let him run, he had nowhere to hide at that point
Pretty much no other civilised country deals with it the way America does. Excessive force on drunken individuals does not end well. American police don't seem to be able to calmly diffuse situations and prefer to kill people
DUI was a violation of parole. The guy was a felon and he didn’t want to go back to jail. Update: Just context, and facts. Understand the situation and draw your own conclusions.
Maybe so but common sense should have prevailed and the police didn't show that. They could have parked his car and drove him home. They escalated a non violent situation into a deadly force outcome. We need the Police but further training is absolutely essential.
@@dwaynejoyce1357 Are you drunk or something? If everyone got free passes for BREAKING THE LAW there would be no need for police. He broke the law.....again.
@@MrLakin11 A msn drunk doesn't deserve to die not in my county anyway but in the states well it happens all to frequently that's why the shit is going down over there now. I though civil liberties were sacrosanct
@@dwaynejoyce1357 He was drunk and behind the wheel. Are you serious? Since when do we expect cops to take drunk drivers home to sleep it off? Last I checked DUI's were taken seriously and the population at large condemn drunk drivers. He then attacked the officers when they were arresting him for the universally agreed crime (Until this case in particular apparently) violently and took the cops weapon and tried to use it against him. SMH. This is getting rediculous
Wow. A drunk driver should get a pass because he’s “not trying to hurt anyone..” My wife would lose her shit if she heard this. Her pregnant sister was in labor and on her way to the hospital when a drunk driver struck her, killing her, the baby, the father of the baby, and a friend of theirs. Drunk drivers ARE trying to hurt people. They know they are endangering their own lives and the lives of anyone they drive near, and they _still_ sit in that driver’s seat.
You're missing the distinction that he gave in two ways. (1) He was specifically talking about cases where people had done no harm (no accidents, no striking your wife's pregnant sister and family), but rather someone who is over the limit while driving. (2) He wasn't talking about giving a pass to anyone, but rather citing and getting the people home safely to deal with later in court, rather than arresting , impounding cars, etc. You can certainly disagree, but you shouldn't misstate.
Dude a felon with multiple DUI and was passed out drunk at the drive through window and completely unresponsive...Hey buddy, social worker Jane here...can I call you an Uber?
Rockhardfister A drunk person’s unethical mind that chooses to drive is a deadly weapon. He deserved jail not to be tucked into his own bed. If you’d like, I could ask my 14 year old niece and two brothers 21 and 34 that are 6’ under, because of a pos like that, what they think? Oh wait. I guess I can’t do that.
They are not Laws they are rules this is one of the real big issues people have been deceived into believing that laws are Laws when they are rules and the cops are coming down heavy on people who violate rules. Rules require people's consent and the people have a right not to consent to them.
@@samrowbotham8914 You're just playing a deceptive sematic word game. There are criminal statues that make DUI illegal in every U.S. state. Laws are generally enacted through the process of indirect consent i.e. dually elected legislatures create and codify almost all laws. If everyone tried to invalidate and weasel their way out of following laws because they viewed them only as "rules" which require personal consent to be valid, society would collapse within months. Imagine telling a judge that laws preventing homicide are not laws, but "rules," and since you doesn't "consent" to those rules, they are invalid and murdering someone isn't a crime. Lol
Yeah my first thought, he was driving drunk and passed out while behind the wheel in the drive thru. That was when the police were called. TBH why would he not drive drunk the next day if he got a ticket.
Rashard was a convicted child abuser that got released early because of COVID, he knew that getting arrested again would get him +6 years in prison so he freaked out.
Joe this is a very easy question. The education department is at fault K-college! You teach white lids to hate themselves, black kids to be victims and everyone else to hate America. Throw in having drag queen story hour for 5 year olds and professors backing antifa, archeologists tweeting diagrams how to properly pull down a statue it’s FUCKIN OBVIOUS who is to BLAME!
He may be on to something along the lines take the car...run through booking, release. Found driving again before disposition..automatic 60 days in jail. The laws should be unwavering in their application. What happens post arrest varies way to much, based on to many factors.
Driving is deadly too, and there are plenty of drivers that have been negligent and caused deaths but because they were sober it was just an accident and they got off. But yea, let's ruin people's lives because they MIGHT hurt someone else.
@@BigShepp1432 Love to see all your reports of drivers negligently killing others and getting off. My guess is you have ZERO specific instances in mind...
Dubstep Shep so in your estimate there is no significant or functional difference between sober drivers and intoxicated drivers? One is not more prone to (deadlier) accidents than the other?
Joe Rogan - “Cops should be there for the violent people” Rayshard Brooks - Cruelty to Children, Battery, false imprisonment, obstructing an officer... “Can we please Valet your car for you sir?”
Joe, I am still seething over your remark about cops should only be here for the violent ones. You are talking out of your butt and you are so delusional with your words at that moment. Recently we had a gang of kids driving and running through our neighborhood. Some had guns but they were all chasing each other through the houses in our neighborhood and because of lockdown entire families were home. Should the cops only be called for the ones carrying and shooting guns? They all needed cops intervention!!!
@@diannevaldez8670 No one in that neighborhood was armed and willing to defend themselves? Jesus. Either be responsible for your family's defense, and that of yourself, or just accept the fact that you are basically helpless when shit goes down. Sounds like a wakeup call to me
@@scbane I only hit the highlights but for you I will elaborate a bit more for you from my last comment. Those kids attempted to jump into my yard but my really large dogs were, as always, on the ready and might have gotten a chunk of one of those kids. Everything happened really fast, running with cars casing! Also I have several other security protocols of my own that I have and am prepared for. Of course something might come up that takes you by surprise but I do also have a weapon that I am very qualified to use. My friend carries her gun on her property with her almost at all times. I'm very familiar with history and I'm not going to invite these people onto my property. I am not going to be peacefully assembled at the train station and crowded into cattle cars to be sent to God knows where. I normally like Joe Rogan but this entire show has just really made me mad. They are both talking like little dumb ninnies.
Joe Rogan: Alcohol is far worse than weed. Also Joe Rogan: Drunk driving is not that bad. Cops shouldn't be involved. As a Joe Rogan fan, I can't believe he thinks that drunk driving isn't a serious crime.
Stray7 he fired the taser he took from the cops while running away, watch the footage. If he were to tase the cops, whos to say he wouldn’t have went for the actual gun?
@@Stray7 He's not dead because he was running. Did all of you idiots NOT watch the video? Where he was beating the shit out of the cops and shot them with their own taser? If he was just running away he wouldn't be dead. If he hadn't been a fucking scum bag his entire life, he wouldn't have been in that position. Every shitty choice he made throughout his entire life, led him up to that point, and then he went and made even shittier choices that got him killed.
Drunk driver put my mom in ICU for 3 days for brain hemorrhage since he hit 2 cars on his way home. A nice and compliant drunk driver is still a drunk driver. Theres plenty of stories of drunk drivers killing other drivers with families, this is nothing new. When a drunk driver send your love ones to ICU or cemetery, you”ll understand my perspective
My best friend in Jr High lost her mom, stepdad and 2 year old brother to a drunk driver. I understand and I have zero sympathy for people who drive drunk and get caught and suffer the consequences.
Damn rights. No sympathy for drunk drivers. I think it should be a one strike kind of thing. Drive drunk once and fuck off you’re not driving anymore. It’s a privilege not a right.
Okay he wasn’t even driving though. He was park taking a nap. Now at that point and I seen it myself because I work at a corner store, they should of called a cab or called his wife. Why take someone to jail? I seen drunk offf duties cops and his buddy either follower him home or takes him. What the difference???? He didn’t need to die. I can understand if he was pulled over on a highway but he wasn’t.
We ask navy seals, journalists, politicians, random people on social media, etc how to reform the police? Shouldn’t we ask the low level police officers who are in the front line and are complaining about police issues but no one wants to listen to them?
The vast majority of these conflicts involve criminal behavior by habitual criminals! The focus is on the wrong side of this issue. It's a naive and reckless ideology.
I see the problem as one of budgets and politics in the name of personal career gain. Saying 'dont defund the police, we mostly do a good job' is correct, but also lazy and cheap. Saying 'then we need more funding into monitoring and training of officers so they can all do a good job' is what would really help change in my opinion.
Well, very high pension plans, extremely high taxes, gum wrapper drug chains triple flowing at the south border, big store companies leaving or bankrupt, and you can guess the binder ingredient,...Then the world in tuned by constant war, yet nobody sees the connectivity of it all,...😡🇺🇸
“Order me an Uber” where is the personal responsibility joe? He chose to drink and he chose to drive. If you’re a big boy, you can also do the responsible thing and get an Uber yourself, beforehand.
Freedom died a long time ago. Really have to arrest someone for that? And kill them? And people think North Korea is brutal. You people crave an authoritarian regime
@@fxmilitia1130 The rule of law is freedom. You should have the freedom to do what you want within the constraints of the law. When people break laws and arbitrarily get away with it, more people disrespect more laws. A breakdown of law and order is a loss of freedom. Society is when we trade some restrictions (minimum necessary laws) in exchange for other freedoms. Freedoms include safety and the ability to pursue prosperity via voluntary interactions with others. Are laws against drink driving necessary for public safety? Yes.
He gets ticketed and has to go to court, it's not just get an Uber and go home bye bye. Rogan has a point, the weight of the sanction matters much less than the propensity of getting one so long as there is some sort of balance. If people were certain to get 500 USD fines for drunk driving, no one would do it. If 0.1% of them get caught and need to go 2 weeks in jail, people won't care. You can argue that the rich then would not care because they can just pay, and you'd be right, so community service should be added to it.
As a black man I respect that they both know what they’re talking about, something that’s needed in today’s society. Too much Ig And TMZ etc etc ...social engineering is giving false power and knowledge that has very little to do with coming together as one regardless of race.
We need more nuanced discussion like this, we all have different opinions on this, if we can't talk about it then there will be civil war this is why I hate the left who tries to silence every voice of nuance.
"as a black man" "as a white man" "as a woman" "as a short person" Why bother to identify with race at all? Its superficial. You give it power with words, you're casting spells about what reality you are plucking out of infinite possibilities with self limiting beliefs and language. Racism ends as soon as we stop bringing it into existence by validating the construct with language that creates some illusion based difference between yourself and another entity. As soon as people stop writing this script for themselves to follow we can all stop ourselves playing out this terrible identity politics based drama that will lead to further seperration and more hate based experiential outcomes.. If you ignore it it ceases to exist.
@@jameza6129 okaaaaay what u doing. Laughing at this dude cause he thought common scene would extend further out into schools. I mean we all had to think that thought at one point but I think it's more of surprise it's not more normalized but maybe that's just me
I agree with you, the Wendy's incident didn't happen because of aggressive policing. The guy had driven the car drunk, was making zero sense, and his alibi just didn't add up. So logical step, let's bring him to the station let him simmer down, figure out what's up. The go to put him in cuffs, he fights. At what logical point can you justify someone grabbing a cops taser and shooting it at them in this incident? The cops were not at fault, and even still the cops were just trying to keep him and everyone else safe.
During the collapse of Yugoslavia in the absence of structured power after the war and atrocities. The power vacuum was filled by criminal gangs. Don’t destroy your country by letting go of rule of law.
@momentinpassing That just isn't true just look at what happened in CHAZ once there was no rule of law. Certain elements thought great lets take advantage and settle a few scores. People really need to take a good look at everything that played out there that's the future you will have if you pursue misguided ideals. It's not going to turn into a hippy festival the vacuum will be filled with those more brutal and better able to hold onto power. You want to see an unfairly stacked system just keep tugging at the threads.
Nino Carrion yes we should arrest anyone doing something illegal. Moment said there is one rule for one and another for the rich. I’m saying there is one rule for all under the law. By all means arrest corrupt people in the finance sector, law enforcement doing anything illegal as well as arrest people smashing up businesses and trying to burn down court houses. I mentioned CHAZ to show it as a microcosm of what will happen in the event of civil collapse drawing the parallel to the Yugoslav civil war. Why because I know people who were there as peace keepers, and people who had to flee their own country due to the rampant criminality. Once there was no formal rule of law being enforced it was party time for those that would take advantage of that. Then the battle to regain rule of law is a process that would take decades.
Asking to be let go after getting caught doing something that kills thousands of people, drinking and driving, is ridiculous. Oh, he asked for an uber! We better let him go, then! 💩
Joe, Brooks was drunk in a public place, in a drive-thru, and he was a great guy until he decided to be NOT be a great guy anymore and fought the police and took a taser which he fired at an officer which escalates the Use Of Force Continuum to deadly force. Brooks made that choice and he should be held accountable for that choice. I'm not against police reform but you can't train a dog to do tricks and then beat it when it does what it's trained.
@@gangalee Usually because they comply with police instead of tackle the police to the ground and try to steal their weapons. In this particular case as well, he was such a great guy that he probably just wanted to go home to beat the shit out of his wife and kid like the good old days. I suppose thats a step up from the usual abandonment of family seen in these communities though.
Soifthey did give him an uber home....Rashard would just say yeah I can keep driving drunk and the cops will just give me a ride home!....Until he kills a van load of children the next time.....that's what started MADD in the first place!
I believe that the kids, at large, are living out the “Purge” fantasy. They are high on the ability to act out violently without repercussion. So, the movement is largely fueled by rage with almost no clear cause; violence through action equals lawless chaos.
Maybe all the rage, resentment, and frustration that we are seeing lately has to do with the younger generations declining living standards, the fact that both major political parties and most politicians aren't responsive to the needs to their constituents, the fact that the cops are basically just a group of thugs who are paid by the government and given military grade weapons and gear, the fact that economic inequality is reaching unprecedented levels, etc. People feel disenfranchised and that nothing is being done to reform or correct this injustices. You can only keep ramping up the pressure inside a pressure cooker so long before it eventually explodes into anarchy, revolution or civil war.
Wow nice one joe, ive payed thousands of dollars for my first dwi in NYC and you just want cops to drive this guy home lolololo joe u are out of your mind
All of you guys are right he was drunk and he should have went to jail. But he didn’t deserve to die that’s the point. Resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, DUI, all crimes and are arrest able offenses. However, it is not a death sentence you guys are missing the point
He wasn’t a bad guy, just call him an Uber. He was operating a vehicle which can kill you as quick as a firearm. He was so drunk he passed out in a drive thru window. I think Mr. Rogan would have a very different opinion if he were personally affected by a drunk driver. Disgraceful! We have a rule of law, which all must follow or a civilized society will break down.
Maybe but sitting drunk in a stationery vehicle with engine off shouldnt be punished with death, especially if one wants to call itsekf a civilised country that is supposedly so much better than the rest of the planet! Or maybe thats what makes it so.
@@adeosinowo3197 I once slept in my car drunk one night as I needed to add extra parking early the following morning so I could leave it to pick up later in the following day. I did sleep in the passenger seat and keep the keys out the ignition , though, and chose a car park with good CCTV to confirm I hadn't even tried to drive it should I get a knock, but thankfully had no issues
@@adeosinowo3197 he wasnt killed because he was driving drunk. he was killed because when they tried to arrest him for breaking the law and endangering people, he fought them
@@intoHeck1964 ahh ok, so the lesson here is: you deserve to die in cold blood if you challenge the law? And this is what makes your country the greatest on this planet & then by proxy the greatest in this solar system, heck why stop there? It must be the greatest country in the Galaxy!
Gotta give it to you Joe, seems that you always are able to have a conversation with people with vastly different views. Wish we all had that talent. Not a fan of all your guests but I admire your ability to get out of the safe spaces and discuss all these relevant topics
@@dropit7694 CNN didn't tell you how he was in jail for felony child abuse, or that he assaulted two cops and took a deadly weapon from one, or that he was shot only after he turned to fire said weapon at a police officer?
@@dropit7694 People armed with a taser who've committed violence against police and are trying to do everything in their power to avoid arrest are very dangerous. There are numerous stories of criminals on the run who have harmed and killed other people.
And I'm sure for some people, a relief that it is. There are enough drunks who can come off as the life of the party, but as soon as they get behind closed doors they turn into a 3rd round slugger. Their arrest may prevent some asshole from going home and beating the living shit out of their family. Even if just for a night.
@@dropit7694 - No, but an officer is justified to use deadly force against a subject who is resisting arrest and has a weapon capable of incapacitating the officer and that is what happened here. Both cops were charged by a politically motivated DA and they will be exonerated and the Mayor will be paying them a hefty civil settlement in civil court.
He'll lose it anyway. Sjws are going to dig up some old clip about trans people, crime or whatever. There's simply too many tripwires. You can bet that Spotifys lawyers are already on the case to get out of this contract. Maybe give 50mill to the ADL and 50 mill to Joe to be rid of him.
I won't make a snap judgement based on a half-hour clip when there's still a (remote) possibility that he's honestly misinformed, but I sure hope he's not selling out. What a loss.
Right !! Joe has found his price tag!! The guy from Atlanta was drunk and wrong on all levels !! And I’m a young black man from Atlanta ! The real Atlanta (Linkwood rd)!
Where'd you get your research from? I couldn't find anything on child abuse? I did some research I found he was out of jail on probation for credit card fraud he was reportedly using a card that was not his and this arrest would void his probation..
@@grasshopper7000 He stole the taser, ran, turned his torso back and fired taser at cop. It's a deadly weapon. townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/06/17/da-in-brooks-shooting-used-to-think-tasers-were-deadly-weapons-n2570858
Joe, brooks was passed out driving in the drivethru. He also abused his children and was on probation. You cant just send somebody home on an uber after a DUI.
He was accused and convicted of child cruelty or some such, but probably shouldn't parrot the claim that he actually abused his children unless you knew the family first-hand. But that's irrelevant, which makes it seem like you're using past crimes to justify murder. What's actually relevant: current law says drunk driving is a very serious criminal offense and does not allow cops to simply let a drunk driver go home or sleep it off in their car. If cops COULD let people off the hook for drunk driving they would do it a lot more often, dealing with drunks is not a fun time, but the general public insists that drunk driving is very serious since it keeps getting us killed in horrible car accidents.
I was pulled over driving under the influence and arrested and thank God that I was for at the very least it prevented me from possibly hitting and hurting/killing someone else. Drunk driving is a serious crime and needs to be dealt with as such.
Wasn't Rayshard Brooks caught asleep drunk in the Wendy's drive-thru which is why the cops were called? He admitted to the cops he had been drinking. That qualifies as DUI in any jurisdiction. The police were rightfully called and had every right to arrest him because of it.
@@rdot8658 he wouldn't have had he complied with the officers instead of punching the officer and then taking his Tazer and pointing it at the officer and firing it
Sota Pop Brooks passed out drunk in the drive thru of the Wendy’s. How do you think he ended up in the drive-thru in his car? Also, you’re wrong about Georgia Law. You can be found guilty of DUI including: “Warm hood of the car, which also suggests the car was driven recently” and many other signs. You’re the moron.
My takeaway from this is that Joe drives drunk or high sometimes. Didn't he have a huge argument with Steven Crowder about how driving under the effects of weed was fine?
I guess it depends on the person. Driving impaired under any kind of drug is bad, even caffeine. There's prescriptions out there that clearly state not to operate machinery. Joe doesn't know what he's talking about and if you get pulled over reeking of weed they'll bust you for that even if it's legal to smoke.
@@TheCoolerChannel No but assaulting police officers and stealing their tazedr than firing that same stolen taser at them while resisting arrest sure will.
@@rdot8658 he was asleep at the wheel of a running vehicle in a drive thru of a restaurant. In most states just being drunk in a car with the keys constitutes a DUI.
@@rdot8658 He drove to the Wendy's and fell asleep in the drive thru line he was so drunk. Its unfortunate hes dead but he should've handled it way differently.
I think what certain places (I believe places like LA) want to implement is a community solution - have a community "guard" to approach nonaggressive, nonviolent criminals and solve the issue at hand. I disagree with the approach, but it's what Joe was advocating
The idea that a drunk driver is just a nice guy who made a little mistake is a very dangerious one, as is the notion that skin color should be seen as a factor. If the policy across the country was "be nice, de-escalate, call a rideshare, we would see a major increase in fatalities, much like we are seeing with retail theft.
Tbh I understand why this person should get arrested but I still do think they should prosecute people for drug use and dealing (only if there driving and causing a danger) and that if someone is driving they should try to either impound there car or make someone else in the car drive the car instead of the person intoxicated.
Johnny Hammersticks not really a lot of the problems with illegal drugs and a lot of deaths behind them are because of them being illegal I would say most drug deaths would drop if they Juss controlled these substances more
Brandon Campbell - Because the acts he commit we’re done directly by him, not more than a few years ago. Blaming an entire people group for things done by other people generations ago, all that are no longer alive, is a textbook definition of racism. My family was not even in America during the time of slavery, some of them where the victims of racism.
Yeah I was going to finish this until Joe started talking about letting drunk drivers take an Uber home after they've been found drunk and asleep in the drive-thru...🙄
Exactly wtf it's harmless until he fucking drives drunk on the wrong side of the freeway and kills Joe's family, I can't believe he justifys the guys behavior.
Nope, he's wrong. The outrage comes in large part from the fact that everyone is depressed and anxious because of genetics. He speaks in very vague terms about what's wrong with our political system because he himself doesn't know.
@@theobserver9131 Ive formulated this opinion by researching the cause of todays chronic illness epidemic. Things like reviews and havard journal posts support my claim. Ever heard of dysgenetics? Its a real field in biology. Actual science. What an odd accusation.
@@andrewthomas5769 I'd rather have one cool guy that is man enough to drive a car while at 4+ alcohol perthousand blood than any of your kind. Spoiled, yelling, selfish, no idea what dignity means.
Hey Joe, I was listening until about 15:30. That's when you opened the door to replace facts with interpretation. Maybe, you might want to watch this interview : Thomas Sowell, on The Legacy of Slavery. That is a good place to start.
I used to drive with Uber and Lyft there was an occasion I had to pick up a guy from Waffle House and when I arrived it was two police officers who had ordered a ride for a drunk guy
go ahead and walk home. the cops the leave. he sneaks back and drives off. this time in a rush and even more prone to have accident. tell that to the MADD groups that forced jail time and automatic arrest for BAC levels that keep dropping over the decades.
I have to disagree. Joe is saying if a cop is handling a situation and the person being corrected for lack of a better word that another cop can step in and over ride his partner and negotiate with the criminal. By the way if you are not cooperating with the police and struggling or fleeing, that is a crime as defined by our courts. Jason
As someone who has duis and who no longer drinks (april 2nd 2019 - sober).. you are right. I feel blessed I didn't hurt anyone, the thing is ppl refuse to take responsibility for their own actions and never grow up to accept responsibility. I learned (took a couple tries bcuz I'm human and I'm dumb) but it's either grow up and learn or your bound to repeat the same mistakes again and again
hochha I think joe sees the value in preventing dui cases through increasing community measures rather than punishing people who’ve already made the mistake
They reason that drunk guy at the drive through was was going to be arrested was because odds are that's not his first time drunk driving, what if they let him leave and he killed a whole family. Drunk driving is a very serious crime. Those cops were not aggressive, he was drunk behind the wheel and it was their job to arrest him. He fought not to go to jail, and in doing so made a very poor decision to try and take one of their weapons. If he had taken a gun instead of a taser those cops would have been dead. Yes it sucks when anyone dies, even if they are making very bad choices, but t.it was his choice to fight.
Probably. But there is something to be said about how people are villainized for something that's rather subjective. What is "drunk"? Is it .08 for everyone? No. Some people at .08 aren't ganna have any problems. Whereas some are with even less alcohol. Before breathalyzers they would take you in if you were obviously drunk. When GW Bush got his you had to be absolutely slammered. Now, you're blind if you don't see how much it's about money and not public safety. However, EVERYBODY knows you can't fight the cops so I have no sympathy for this particular character. I live in Arizona, the strictest state in the union in regards to DUI's. Its ridiculously easy to get one. Do people still do it? Sure. But people just wanna go home. And people should be able to do so if there's no REAL reason to believe that they will cause an accident. Giving up liberty for a false sense of security. But sure, it's all just to protect you...
This comment is exaggerated so that we can see the contradiction. BUT People miss the fact that Joe gave very specific conditions for the whole "Instead of arresting you" idea. I'm not going to put it here, just re-watch the segment.
Are you trolling? The guy wasn't driving, he was sleeping. He only drove when the police told him to move his car. Joe was talking about getting an Uber. Police in other countries find drunk people and are happy to drive them around the corner.
T J Would you care to elaborate? A lot is covered in 24 minutes lol which conclusion are they dead wrong about? All of them? One conclusion which is drawn is that our current system facilitates continued suffering. So if one generation of a family is suffering, the odds are great that the following generation of that family will suffer too. Are they “dead wrong” about that? In other words, do you think upward mobility is made EASIER by our current set of laws?
I see again people that don't understand policing and need to back them 100 percent. When someone resist arrest they are putting the officers life at risk. The incident in Atlanta could have been avoided simply by the criminal copying with the officer. If the officer didn't arrest him and he drove off and killed someone the officer himself would be in trouble. These police experts need to shut up period about policing unless they have actually done it. That means Joe Rogan is absolutely pandering to the left.
I think too many of these people don’t realise that logic and reasoning can factor in the feelings of people as variables, except that then makes it clear that the one arguer’s feelings of indignation count for very little when considering the feelings of the many
True, but logic and reasoning wouldn't solve this issue. People are not ready to listen to this logic and reasoning because the system was built on false Logic and reasoning. It was build by suppressing the emotions, feelings and humanity of a group of people. You have now to fix this broken emotions and feelings by showing understanding and Love and compromising. But clearly that will not happen 😂. Well civil war is inevitable. It is begun and it won't stop until a compromise is made for everyone. The American experience is getting old and broken.
kumchu Elsen, you’re right in that the problem is that discourse has become too emotional, not that there’s simply a reasoning error about emotions. I can’t really see much stopping the zombified mob who’ve switched off to reason
Damn Joe, I usually agree with you, but a program to call a freaking Uber. Do you know how many innocent people are killed by drunk drivers every year. Damn that was dumb!!!
He didn’t say he was in favour of drunk driving. He said he’s in favour of allocating the police to serious crime with alternatives for non immediate threats.
@@dicerevo Someone drunk behind the wheel of a 5000 pound vehicle is an immediate threat. Cops should not be tasked with taking responsibility for other people's bad decisions. You are responsible for your own decisions. Every day, almost 30 people in the United States die in drunk-driving crashes - that's one person every 50 minutes. If you decide to drive while drunk you not deserve a free uber to get you home. You deserve to be punished.
@@dicerevo *Drink driving ISN'T an immediate threat…???* When I was 5 a drunk driver plowed into my friends, as they stood right next to me, at 40 MPH! He literally almost killed them! So maybe we have much different opinions on how to treat drunk drivers.
@@marcus8710 not surprisingly. The elite academia was certain the communist russia would surpass and last longer than the usa. One man out of a small college and joined the airforce, stated against all the intellects that the ussr would fall and it was a hell hole. Turns out that man was right and his name was ronald reagan. No marxist to this day applauds the ussr.
When you drive drunk, you go to jail. Period. Remember, drunk drivers aren’t only risking their life, they are risking the lives of everyone else on the road. RIP Micheal, 19 y/o killed by a drunk driver on his way home from practice.
Man, i've seen videos where that guy rocked 2 cops and then stole their taser. You can say they shouldn't have shot him dead, but you can't say that man was compliant.
Lol. I was offered the same thing by a Maryland trooper. I was left go with a warning. Brooks was parked. Just saying. It happens cops do that all the time.
Ya Joe is out to lunch on Brooks situation. Here in Wisconsin where we have a huge drunk driving problem, the only thing that seems to effectively deter it is escalating the consequences. The police arresting drunk drivers is almost universally agreed on by the public.
Also, a DUI arrest isn't a 'go to jail' offense for most people. They arrest you, process you, and usually release you the same night. Rayshard's problem was that he was on probation (he was released due to COVID-19) and a DUI arrest on probation means his probation would probably be revoked and he somehow thought fighting the cops would solve that problem.
Amen, its against the the law to drive drunk. "Who called the cops on him"? Really joe? He was past out in a drive thru if maybe knowone calls the authorities maybe he drives and kills someone. Thats why. And as cordial as he was so were the police in this case. Take your medicine if you fuck up, and he wasnst a saint just got of jail wit this pity party america is in right now.
Thank you! I've been saying this since they rolled it out. The scary part is, that was their best take. That was the best they could get him to perform. 😬
The core problem, generally, is not policing or "police brutality". It's the disregard of the law and lack of respect of law enforcement that has become far too common these days. The common denominator with these deaths of individuals are their decisions to resist arrest, grab an officer's weapon, or take some other action that forces law enforcement to respond in a potentially lethal manner to defend themselves or the public. This is easily avoided by complying with law enforcement. If the arrest is improper, no one will win that argument in the field--- you challenge it in the courtroom.
Yeah, smh on that one... someone driving behind the wheel intoxicated needs serious repercussions. Whether they’re arrested is one question, but to say that they should merely get a ticket isn’t severe enough imo.
Michael Valente what kind of backwards logic is that? Drunk driving is extremely reckless behavior. When you drink and drive you’re necessarily impaired and thus pose a significant threat to others. Sober drivers can easily be negligent or even reckless with their driving, and yes, kill others. but they’re not automatically impared from the get-go. It’s not the same level of risk.
Michael Valente bro you’re an idiot. You can get charged with vehicular manslaughter if you kill someone in a car crash and it wasn’t a complete accident. And if you’re on your phone or something you do get charged with a crime. Because that shit is illegal.
I've been arrested a couple of times for DUI years ago , I wasn't passed out or driving erratic, I was stopped at roadblocks. I didn't fight the police, I broke the law so I went to jail & paid my fine. I DAMN sure didn't ask for a Taxi!!?? What good is law enforcement if the ones breaking the law get to dictate the outcome???
Check MADD (Mother Against Drunk Driving) twitter feed. Crickets (except for all the comments wondering why they haven't mentioned it like they do all drunk driving cases)
Was he driving drunk or drunk and asleep in a drive thru... There's a huge difference,drunk driving can kill people but sleeping in a drive thru just pisses people off.
Drunk driving in itself is a victimless crime unless someone or something is damaged, hurt, or killed which is already a crime. We shouldn't drive drunk bc it's stupid and dangerous but lots of legal things are stupid and dangerous. No victim = no crime should be the basis for all law. Going away from this is going toward fascism and away from autonomy and freedom even if it makes the world less safe. The amount of damage/income destruction and cost due to DUI laws are far more damaging overall then the relatively few tragic accidents caused by it. It manufactures criminals in order for a false sense of safety with little actual safety created compared to the negative effects created. Fines and loss of license? Sure. Jail time? That's just excessive.
He was sleep in the car & either way the police are to detain not kill. Black people are mad because our tax dollars pay for police who don't detain so you Can have a day in court...you just "magically" end up dead & we talking old,young,men,women & children
Because he doesnt know about the criminal history. Because he doesnt take into account the fact that he stole a taser. Question is does he know, im guessing no which is why its not covered.
The cops name is Garrett Rolfe he has 12 complaints against him one of which is for improper use if his firearm. He has been charged with murder. THIS is your hero if so why? When he gets convicted and becomes a felon will you have as much contempt or will this felon be different. If you are for law and order then you should support the charges this is the same justice system that found Rayshard guilty or will it be different then. For many of you commenting this is absolutely about race and you absolutely are racists and you use alot of language and pretence to cover it up. I would be better if you stopped using law and order language and just say what you really mean. It has become increasingly clear even if you are still lying to yourselves.
"This was just a guy who fucked up." You know how many people die from drunk drivers? One of my good friends in high school was hit head on with both cars moving at least 55 mph at 4am while he was on his way to work. It was less than a year after graduation.. he was only 20 years old. The driver of the other car was wasted. The steering wheel of my friend's car was less than an inch from the drivers seat after the impact. They had to pull his lifeless body out of that car with the jaws of life. His chest and stomach were crushed. He died alone in his car at 4am because someone got behind the wheel like Rayshard Brooks did. I had another friend who WAS a drunk driver and died in much the same way.. actually on the same stretch of road. Later in my life, I was one of those stupid people who got an OWI. I complied and took my punishment.. I didn't fight them and they treated me with respect.. way more respect than I deserved considering how dangerous it is to drink and drive. I could have killed someone.. just slapping someone on the wrist, and getting them an Uber is dumb as shit. Drunk driving is no joke, and we arrest people who do it for a very good reason. When does the personal responsibility discussion start? Most of what I've heard so far is making excuses for stupid decisions when the perpetrator is black.
Get educated. That guy in GA was passed out drunk right in the middle of an active drive thru - cops don’t call you an Uber for that; they rightfully take you to jail. Police responded to a call from the public about the situation and did not just happen upon him as the media would have you believe.
That guy panicked because he was on parole and a DUI conviction sends him back to the slammer.
Did it warrant 2 shots in the back though is the question? They had his car and all his info already. He was going back to jail no matter what. Let him run, he had nowhere to hide at that point
u wrong
They use to until MADD came along.
And then they shot him. Convo ends there. How is there confusion about this
Pretty much no other civilised country deals with it the way America does. Excessive force on drunken individuals does not end well. American police don't seem to be able to calmly diffuse situations and prefer to kill people
DUI was a violation of parole. The guy was a felon and he didn’t want to go back to jail.
Update: Just context, and facts. Understand the situation and draw your own conclusions.
Maybe so but common sense should have prevailed and the police didn't show that. They could have parked his car and drove him home. They escalated a non violent situation into a deadly force outcome. We need the Police but further training is absolutely essential.
@@dwaynejoyce1357 Are you drunk or something? If everyone got free passes for BREAKING THE LAW there would be no need for police. He broke the law.....again.
@@MrLakin11 A msn drunk doesn't deserve to die not in my county anyway but in the states well it happens all to frequently that's why the shit is going down over there now. I though civil liberties were sacrosanct
@@dwaynejoyce1357 He was drunk and behind the wheel. Are you serious? Since when do we expect cops to take drunk drivers home to sleep it off? Last I checked DUI's were taken seriously and the population at large condemn drunk drivers. He then attacked the officers when they were arresting him for the universally agreed crime (Until this case in particular apparently) violently and took the cops weapon and tried to use it against him. SMH. This is getting rediculous
@God sees all!!! They let him out cause of the Covid-19
Wow. A drunk driver should get a pass because he’s “not trying to hurt anyone..”
My wife would lose her shit if she heard this. Her pregnant sister was in labor and on her way to the hospital when a drunk driver struck her, killing her, the baby, the father of the baby, and a friend of theirs.
Drunk drivers ARE trying to hurt people. They know they are endangering their own lives and the lives of anyone they drive near, and they _still_ sit in that driver’s seat.
You're missing the distinction that he gave in two ways. (1) He was specifically talking about cases where people had done no harm (no accidents, no striking your wife's pregnant sister and family), but rather someone who is over the limit while driving. (2) He wasn't talking about giving a pass to anyone, but rather citing and getting the people home safely to deal with later in court, rather than arresting , impounding cars, etc. You can certainly disagree, but you shouldn't misstate.
@@oboogie2 except for the fact that this man was a multiple felon with previous drunk driving convictions 🤦
Dude a felon with multiple DUI and was passed out drunk at the drive through window and completely unresponsive...Hey buddy, social worker Jane here...can I call you an Uber?
Rockhardfister A drunk person’s unethical mind that chooses to drive is a deadly weapon. He deserved jail not to be tucked into his own bed. If you’d like, I could ask my 14 year old niece and two brothers 21 and 34 that are 6’ under, because of a pos like that, what they think? Oh wait. I guess I can’t do that.
@@swfarms63 why are you telling me this? I didn't say he should get a pass. I made a case that the cops were right.
No Joe, Drunk Drivers are a threat to everyone else on the road. Yes they should be arrested, hence we have laws.
They are not Laws they are rules this is one of the real big issues people have been deceived into believing that laws are Laws when they are rules and the cops are coming down heavy on people who violate rules. Rules require people's consent and the people have a right not to consent to them.
@@samrowbotham8914 There are drunk driving laws in Canada, if there isn't in the US, then there should be.
@@LGB007 you missed his whole point.
@@LGB007 proud of you tho
@@samrowbotham8914
You're just playing a deceptive sematic word game. There are criminal statues that make DUI illegal in every U.S. state. Laws are generally enacted through the process of indirect consent i.e. dually elected legislatures create and codify almost all laws. If everyone tried to invalidate and weasel their way out of following laws because they viewed them only as "rules" which require personal consent to be valid, society would collapse within months. Imagine telling a judge that laws preventing homicide are not laws, but "rules," and since you doesn't "consent" to those rules, they are invalid and murdering someone isn't a crime. Lol
Joe is completely off on the Rashard case, how do you think people get killed drunk driving, peacefully?
Yeah my first thought, he was driving drunk and passed out while behind the wheel in the drive thru. That was when the police were called. TBH why would he not drive drunk the next day if he got a ticket.
He’s brainwashed too need to maintain order never let shit slide respect and be respected don’t get soft on em joe
Yes Joe please watch the entire police cameras
Sure go ahead and drive drunk, we’ll just call you an Uber and order some burgers.
No shit
Rashard was a convicted child abuser that got released early because of COVID, he knew that getting arrested again would get him +6 years in prison so he freaked out.
I'm not a big fan of child abusers.
Correct!
#NoNakerDiet Saves Lives!
#PinkPill living! 💙 👨✌
Trump 2020
Trump can straighten this out after he re-elected
Joe this is a very easy question. The education department is at fault K-college! You teach white lids to hate themselves, black kids to be victims and everyone else to hate America. Throw in having drag queen story hour for 5 year olds and professors backing antifa, archeologists tweeting diagrams how to properly pull down a statue it’s FUCKIN OBVIOUS who is to BLAME!
Drunk driving is deadly, Joe. Can't just send this guy on his way.
He may be on to something along the lines take the car...run through booking, release. Found driving again before disposition..automatic 60 days in jail. The laws should be unwavering in their application. What happens post arrest varies way to much, based on to many factors.
I thought his drunk ass fell asleep sitting in the drive through line. And that’s what initiated the restaurant to call LE.
Driving is deadly too, and there are plenty of drivers that have been negligent and caused deaths but because they were sober it was just an accident and they got off. But yea, let's ruin people's lives because they MIGHT hurt someone else.
@@BigShepp1432 Love to see all your reports of drivers negligently killing others and getting off. My guess is you have ZERO specific instances in mind...
Dubstep Shep so in your estimate there is no significant or functional difference between sober drivers and intoxicated drivers? One is not more prone to (deadlier) accidents than the other?
Joe Rogan - “Cops should be there for the violent people”
Rayshard Brooks - Cruelty to Children, Battery, false imprisonment, obstructing an officer...
“Can we please Valet your car for you sir?”
Joe, I am still seething over your remark about cops should only be here for the violent ones. You are talking out of your butt and you are so delusional with your words at that moment. Recently we had a gang of kids driving and running through our neighborhood. Some had guns but they were all chasing each other through the houses in our neighborhood and because of lockdown entire families were home. Should the cops only be called for the ones carrying and shooting guns? They all needed cops intervention!!!
@@diannevaldez8670 That had the potential for violence, so in that case, he'd agree that yes the cops should be involved.
@@diannevaldez8670 No one in that neighborhood was armed and willing to defend themselves? Jesus. Either be responsible for your family's defense, and that of yourself, or just accept the fact that you are basically helpless when shit goes down. Sounds like a wakeup call to me
@@scbane I only hit the highlights but for you I will elaborate a bit more for you from my last comment. Those kids attempted to jump into my yard but my really large dogs were, as always, on the ready and might have gotten a chunk of one of those kids. Everything happened really fast, running with cars casing! Also I have several other security protocols of my own that I have and am prepared for. Of course something might come up that takes you by surprise but I do also have a weapon that I am very qualified to use. My friend carries her gun on her property with her almost at all times. I'm very familiar with history and I'm not going to invite these people onto my property. I am not going to be peacefully assembled at the train station and crowded into cattle cars to be sent to God knows where. I normally like Joe Rogan but this entire show has just really made me mad. They are both talking like little dumb ninnies.
Joe Rogan: Alcohol is far worse than weed.
Also Joe Rogan: Drunk driving is not that bad. Cops shouldn't be involved.
As a Joe Rogan fan, I can't believe he thinks that drunk driving isn't a serious crime.
He's saying a guy shouldn't be dead just for being drunk, but the guy is dead for trying to escape detainment and stealing an officer's weapon.
@@glemmstengal He wasn't killed for drunk driving. I'm not understanding Joes context and point...is the point
@@glemmstengal Guy shouldn't be dead for that, either. Running from a cop should not be a death sentence.
Stray7 he fired the taser he took from the cops while running away, watch the footage. If he were to tase the cops, whos to say he wouldn’t have went for the actual gun?
@@Stray7 He's not dead because he was running. Did all of you idiots NOT watch the video? Where he was beating the shit out of the cops and shot them with their own taser? If he was just running away he wouldn't be dead. If he hadn't been a fucking scum bag his entire life, he wouldn't have been in that position. Every shitty choice he made throughout his entire life, led him up to that point, and then he went and made even shittier choices that got him killed.
Drunk driver put my mom in ICU for 3 days for brain hemorrhage since he hit 2 cars on his way home.
A nice and compliant drunk driver is still a drunk driver.
Theres plenty of stories of drunk drivers killing other drivers with families, this is nothing new.
When a drunk driver send your love ones to ICU or cemetery, you”ll understand my perspective
My best friend in Jr High lost her mom, stepdad and 2 year old brother to a drunk driver. I understand and I have zero sympathy for people who drive drunk and get caught and suffer the consequences.
Damn rights. No sympathy for drunk drivers. I think it should be a one strike kind of thing. Drive drunk once and fuck off you’re not driving anymore. It’s a privilege not a right.
Sorry for your loss🙏
Okay he wasn’t even driving though. He was park taking a nap. Now at that point and I seen it myself because I work at a corner store, they should of called a cab or called his wife. Why take someone to jail? I seen drunk offf duties cops and his buddy either follower him home or takes him. What the difference???? He didn’t need to die. I can understand if he was pulled over on a highway but he wasn’t.
Christopher Allen lol in a drive thru. It’s called a DRIVE THRU for a reason. Not a PARKING LOT
We ask navy seals, journalists, politicians, random people on social media, etc how to reform the police? Shouldn’t we ask the low level police officers who are in the front line and are complaining about police issues but no one wants to listen to them?
A lot of cops get in trouble for posting their opinions on instagram
Other countries have two years training, that would be a good start
The vast majority of these conflicts involve criminal behavior by habitual criminals! The focus is on the wrong side of this issue. It's a naive and reckless ideology.
I see the problem as one of budgets and politics in the name of personal career gain.
Saying 'dont defund the police, we mostly do a good job' is correct, but also lazy and cheap.
Saying 'then we need more funding into monitoring and training of officers so they can all do a good job' is what would really help change in my opinion.
Well, very high pension plans, extremely high taxes, gum wrapper drug chains triple flowing at the south border, big store companies leaving or bankrupt, and you can guess the binder ingredient,...Then the world in tuned by constant war, yet nobody sees the connectivity of it all,...😡🇺🇸
When you say “mark Lamont hill made a good point”, I shut you off.
“Order me an Uber” where is the personal responsibility joe? He chose to drink and he chose to drive. If you’re a big boy, you can also do the responsible thing and get an Uber yourself, beforehand.
Freedom died a long time ago. Really have to arrest someone for that? And kill them? And people think North Korea is brutal. You people crave an authoritarian regime
@@fxmilitia1130 The rule of law is freedom. You should have the freedom to do what you want within the constraints of the law. When people break laws and arbitrarily get away with it, more people disrespect more laws. A breakdown of law and order is a loss of freedom. Society is when we trade some restrictions (minimum necessary laws) in exchange for other freedoms. Freedoms include safety and the ability to pursue prosperity via voluntary interactions with others. Are laws against drink driving necessary for public safety? Yes.
Yeah, last I checked, the cops don’t just call you a cab when you’re caught driving drunk.😂
Rogan is a moron
He gets ticketed and has to go to court, it's not just get an Uber and go home bye bye. Rogan has a point, the weight of the sanction matters much less than the propensity of getting one so long as there is some sort of balance.
If people were certain to get 500 USD fines for drunk driving, no one would do it. If 0.1% of them get caught and need to go 2 weeks in jail, people won't care.
You can argue that the rich then would not care because they can just pay, and you'd be right, so community service should be added to it.
As a black man I respect that they both know what they’re talking about, something that’s needed in today’s society. Too much Ig And TMZ etc etc ...social engineering is giving false power and knowledge that has very little to do with coming together as one regardless of race.
Your being black does not give you unique insights into what Joe Rogan and Guest know. Don’t be ridiculous. Playing the race card doesn’t work.
We need more nuanced discussion like this, we all have different opinions on this, if we can't talk about it then there will be civil war this is why I hate the left who tries to silence every voice of nuance.
@tech 52 Now that was a reply with "nuance"-- We don't know if you were serious or not. Nicely done.
"as a black man" "as a white man" "as a woman" "as a short person"
Why bother to identify with race at all? Its superficial.
You give it power with words, you're casting spells about what reality you are plucking out of infinite possibilities with self limiting beliefs and language. Racism ends as soon as we stop bringing it into existence by validating the construct with language that creates some illusion based difference between yourself and another entity.
As soon as people stop writing this script for themselves to follow we can all stop ourselves playing out this terrible identity politics based drama that will lead to further seperration and more hate based experiential outcomes..
If you ignore it it ceases to exist.
ALL HAIL SATAN which party do you connect with? I’m going the opposite way.
I just learned more from this man in half an hour then I did in 10 years in school.
Fax 💯
Then you went to an awful school because what he says is common sense and obvious.
@@jameza6129 okaaaaay what u doing. Laughing at this dude cause he thought common scene would extend further out into schools. I mean we all had to think that thought at one point but I think it's more of surprise it's not more normalized but maybe that's just me
I can't even wrap my head around how f'd up the school system in your country must be then 😂 I feel sorry for you
“A zombified collective fighting a boogie man that they have created “ says it perfectly
TDS
Tdc
True
Damn, as a rogan fan I disagree about the Wendy's incident.
I think Joe was not genuinely making a case but rather paraphrasing things others have been saying.
What do you disagree about?
elev8tor guy rogan fans should disagree there’s way too many of us to not have productive conversations in disagreement
Many do! That cop was a fall guy.
I agree with you, the Wendy's incident didn't happen because of aggressive policing. The guy had driven the car drunk, was making zero sense, and his alibi just didn't add up. So logical step, let's bring him to the station let him simmer down, figure out what's up. The go to put him in cuffs, he fights. At what logical point can you justify someone grabbing a cops taser and shooting it at them in this incident? The cops were not at fault, and even still the cops were just trying to keep him and everyone else safe.
During the collapse of Yugoslavia in the absence of structured power after the war and atrocities. The power vacuum was filled by criminal gangs. Don’t destroy your country by letting go of rule of law.
@momentinpassing That just isn't true just look at what happened in CHAZ once there was no rule of law. Certain elements thought great lets take advantage and settle a few scores. People really need to take a good look at everything that played out there that's the future you will have if you pursue misguided ideals. It's not going to turn into a hippy festival the vacuum will be filled with those more brutal and better able to hold onto power. You want to see an unfairly stacked system just keep tugging at the threads.
@@Anotsu01 sooo.. we shouldn't arrest criminal bankers? So we shouldn't hold the police accountable? Why do you mention CHAZ?
Anotsu01 You didn’t refute his point. When have big bankers been thrown in jail for fraud and counterfeiting currencies?
Nino Carrion yes we should arrest anyone doing something illegal. Moment said there is one rule for one and another for the rich. I’m saying there is one rule for all under the law.
By all means arrest corrupt people in the finance sector, law enforcement doing anything illegal as well as arrest people smashing up businesses and trying to burn down court houses.
I mentioned CHAZ to show it as a microcosm of what will happen in the event of civil collapse drawing the parallel to the Yugoslav civil war. Why because I know people who were there as peace keepers, and people who had to flee their own country due to the rampant criminality.
Once there was no formal rule of law being enforced it was party time for those that would take advantage of that. Then the battle to regain rule of law is a process that would take decades.
There was 17,000+ murders in the first half of 2020 in Mexico due to gangs and a weak law system.
Asking to be let go after getting caught doing something that kills thousands of people, drinking and driving, is ridiculous.
Oh, he asked for an uber! We better let him go, then! 💩
Joe, Brooks was drunk in a public place, in a drive-thru, and he was a great guy until he decided to be NOT be a great guy anymore and fought the police and took a taser which he fired at an officer which escalates the Use Of Force Continuum to deadly force. Brooks made that choice and he should be held accountable for that choice.
I'm not against police reform but you can't train a dog to do tricks and then beat it when it does what it's trained.
If he wrecked and killed your wife and kids I’m sure the first thing on your mind would be “but he’s a good guy”
Yet ppl don’t get shot for being drunk. And when they eventually do get sentenced, they do less and easier time
@@gangalee who got shot for being drunk?
@@gangalee Usually because they comply with police instead of tackle the police to the ground and try to steal their weapons. In this particular case as well, he was such a great guy that he probably just wanted to go home to beat the shit out of his wife and kid like the good old days. I suppose thats a step up from the usual abandonment of family seen in these communities though.
Exactly, got should’ve gotten an Uber in the first place
I think you’re smart enough to look up the data, to see how many people die from drunk drivers...
30 people die every fucking day due to assholes who decide to get behind the wheel. many who are repeat offenders too.
@@Baghuul that makes me sad. 😥 I've never had a DUI, in the past I was a drunk walker. I've gotten three public intoxication charges
Soifthey did give him an uber home....Rashard would just say yeah I can keep driving drunk and the cops will just give me a ride home!....Until he kills a van load of children the next time.....that's what started MADD in the first place!
James Teague Giving him an Uber rude home is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard.
@@jamesteague9072 Joe gets naive or is playing devils advocate or he is just living in california too long.
I believe it in big part the privatization of the prison system. That’s where people should be focusing their attention.
I believe that the kids, at large, are living out the “Purge” fantasy. They are high on the ability to act out violently without repercussion. So, the movement is largely fueled by rage with almost no clear cause; violence through action equals lawless chaos.
Yes. Playing purge. Very much of this was that.
I don't even think rage plays in to it. "Without repercussion " is key. People do crazy shit when they are young , ignorant and have no repercussion
I was robbed by two teenagers yesterday. This comment resonates with me. They were acting with recklessness and no empathy or repercussions .
Maybe all the rage, resentment, and frustration that we are seeing lately has to do with the younger generations declining living standards, the fact that both major political parties and most politicians aren't responsive to the needs to their constituents, the fact that the cops are basically just a group of thugs who are paid by the government and given military grade weapons and gear, the fact that economic inequality is reaching unprecedented levels, etc. People feel disenfranchised and that nothing is being done to reform or correct this injustices. You can only keep ramping up the pressure inside a pressure cooker so long before it eventually explodes into anarchy, revolution or civil war.
Imagine thinking a cop should just call an uber for someone who is drunk driving.
Thats not the law though.
Brown privilege makes you believe that’s a possibility.
Read the above comment ^ for that imagination to become a reality right before your eyes.
Yeah .. and put it on the city's dime. Maybe they should have sent him home with some yummy Wendy's as well?
@Alexander Garrett Would you wrestle with a cop, pull their weapon, and point it at them? Think rationally. That's not a good ending.
I wish the cops called Uber for my DUI, but I was breaking the law so I went to jail. Cmon Joe.
And you sound like someone who understands they fucked up and put others at risk, not making excuses for yourself better after
right?? i was one block from my house and still got booked.....
Same here.
Wow nice one joe, ive payed thousands of dollars for my first dwi in NYC and you just want cops to drive this guy home lolololo joe u are out of your mind
All of you guys are right he was drunk and he should have went to jail. But he didn’t deserve to die that’s the point. Resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, DUI, all crimes and are arrest able offenses. However, it is not a death sentence you guys are missing the point
He wasn’t a bad guy, just call him an Uber. He was operating a vehicle which can kill you as quick as a firearm. He was so drunk he passed out in a drive thru window. I think Mr. Rogan would have a very different opinion if he were personally affected by a drunk driver. Disgraceful! We have a rule of law, which all must follow or a civilized society will break down.
Maybe but sitting drunk in a stationery vehicle with engine off shouldnt be punished with death, especially if one wants to call itsekf a civilised country that is supposedly so much better than the rest of the planet! Or maybe thats what makes it so.
@@adeosinowo3197 I once slept in my car drunk one night as I needed to add extra parking early the following morning so I could leave it to pick up later in the following day.
I did sleep in the passenger seat and keep the keys out the ignition , though, and chose a car park with good CCTV to confirm I hadn't even tried to drive it should I get a knock, but thankfully had no issues
@@adeosinowo3197 he wasnt killed because he was driving drunk. he was killed because when they tried to arrest him for breaking the law and endangering people, he fought them
@@intoHeck1964 ahh ok, so the lesson here is: you deserve to die in cold blood if you challenge the law? And this is what makes your country the greatest on this planet & then by proxy the greatest in this solar system, heck why stop there? It must be the greatest country in the Galaxy!
Gotta give it to you Joe, seems that you always are able to have a conversation with people with vastly different views. Wish we all had that talent. Not a fan of all your guests but I admire your ability to get out of the safe spaces and discuss all these relevant topics
DUI is a crime regardless of how polite the perpetrator is.
You don’t need to shoot them if they attempt to flee either
@@dropit7694 CNN didn't tell you how he was in jail for felony child abuse, or that he assaulted two cops and took a deadly weapon from one, or that he was shot only after he turned to fire said weapon at a police officer?
@@dropit7694 People armed with a taser who've committed violence against police and are trying to do everything in their power to avoid arrest are very dangerous. There are numerous stories of criminals on the run who have harmed and killed other people.
And I'm sure for some people, a relief that it is. There are enough drunks who can come off as the life of the party, but as soon as they get behind closed doors they turn into a 3rd round slugger. Their arrest may prevent some asshole from going home and beating the living shit out of their family. Even if just for a night.
@@dropit7694 - No, but an officer is justified to use deadly force against a subject who is resisting arrest and has a weapon capable of incapacitating the officer and that is what happened here. Both cops were charged by a politically motivated DA and they will be exonerated and the Mayor will be paying them a hefty civil settlement in civil court.
Joe "I better not say the wrong thing and lose my huge Spotify deal" Rogan.
Tip toe joe
@Libs Hate Montesquieu I unsubbed after seeing this shit show of an interview. He's completely gone now.
He'll lose it anyway. Sjws are going to dig up some old clip about trans people, crime or whatever. There's simply too many tripwires. You can bet that Spotifys lawyers are already on the case to get out of this contract. Maybe give 50mill to the ADL and 50 mill to Joe to be rid of him.
I won't make a snap judgement based on a half-hour clip when there's still a (remote) possibility that he's honestly misinformed, but I sure hope he's not selling out. What a loss.
Right !!
Joe has found his price tag!!
The guy from Atlanta was drunk and wrong on all levels !!
And I’m a young black man from Atlanta !
The real Atlanta (Linkwood rd)!
“What is The root cause? these are just symptoms” reminds me of rocky horror picture show 😂
I was a regular Frankie fan!
Not more funding, better project management. Proper allocation of funding.
Do your research. Brooks was on parole for beating his children.
Where'd you get your research from? I couldn't find anything on child abuse? I did some research I found he was out of jail on probation for credit card fraud he was reportedly using a card that was not his and this arrest would void his probation..
So that mean he had to die
@@grasshopper7000
Yeah. That's what it means. F'ing idiot.
@@grasshopper7000 He stole the taser, ran, turned his torso back and fired taser at cop. It's a deadly weapon. townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/06/17/da-in-brooks-shooting-used-to-think-tasers-were-deadly-weapons-n2570858
kyussdemon1 I doesn’t matter on his background he shouldn’t have died
Joe, brooks was passed out driving in the drivethru. He also abused his children and was on probation. You cant just send somebody home on an uber after a DUI.
I wish it was that easy! Made myself that mistake in 08, $17,000 dollars later.... it's a money grab.
He was accused and convicted of child cruelty or some such, but probably shouldn't parrot the claim that he actually abused his children unless you knew the family first-hand.
But that's irrelevant, which makes it seem like you're using past crimes to justify murder.
What's actually relevant: current law says drunk driving is a very serious criminal offense and does not allow cops to simply let a drunk driver go home or sleep it off in their car. If cops COULD let people off the hook for drunk driving they would do it a lot more often, dealing with drunks is not a fun time, but the general public insists that drunk driving is very serious since it keeps getting us killed in horrible car accidents.
@Offset SMH
I don't know who still needs to hear this, but cops aren't supposed to kill guilty people, either.
@W R sure it does if he gets arrested he goes back to prison he was out on probation.
I was pulled over driving under the influence and arrested and thank God that I was for at the very least it prevented me from possibly hitting and hurting/killing someone else. Drunk driving is a serious crime and needs to be dealt with as such.
A drunk driver is a bad person, ask my best friend’s dead wife and infant daughter.
Rayshard was on parole and DUI was a violation.
Calico Bill and?
What does this add to the convention?
@@Camoutlaw That is why he resisted. He didn't want to go back to jail.
Cam Outlaw and what? It was a fact that he was pointing out lmao😂😂😂
Calico Bill
Exactly
Wasn't Rayshard Brooks caught asleep drunk in the Wendy's drive-thru which is why the cops were called? He admitted to the cops he had been drinking. That qualifies as DUI in any jurisdiction. The police were rightfully called and had every right to arrest him because of it.
He did not deserve to die
Dylann Roof
@@rdot8658 he wouldn't have had he complied with the officers instead of punching the officer and then taking his Tazer and pointing it at the officer and firing it
@@rdot8658 he fought two cops took there taser shot one of them with it and ran off blind firing with it drunk i really dont know what to tell you
Sota Pop Brooks passed out drunk in the drive thru of the Wendy’s. How do you think he ended up in the drive-thru in his car? Also, you’re wrong about Georgia Law. You can be found guilty of DUI including: “Warm hood of the car, which also suggests the car was driven recently” and many other signs. You’re the moron.
“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their opinions are willing to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy is education.” FDR
Wow, Joe’s take on what they should’ve done with Rayshard Brooks is possibly the dumbest thing I’ve heard him say.
My takeaway from this is that Joe drives drunk or high sometimes. Didn't he have a huge argument with Steven Crowder about how driving under the effects of weed was fine?
I guess it depends on the person. Driving impaired under any kind of drug is bad, even caffeine. There's prescriptions out there that clearly state not to operate machinery. Joe doesn't know what he's talking about and if you get pulled over reeking of weed they'll bust you for that even if it's legal to smoke.
Driving 40 mph on the interstate is just as dangerous for the public as driving 100. Change my mind!
@@sleazyfellow Weed is not as bad for driving as alcohol but it's still much worse than being sober.
Because it is fine.
@@Pyryp2 depends on the person. I can drive drunk way better than i can drive high.
Drunk driving kills people Joe, it's kinda a big deal.
Apparently drunk sleeping does too late
@@TheCoolerChannel No but assaulting police officers and stealing their tazedr than firing that same stolen taser at them while resisting arrest sure will.
True but he wasn’t driving he was asleep. He should not be dead right now
@@rdot8658 he was asleep at the wheel of a running vehicle in a drive thru of a restaurant. In most states just being drunk in a car with the keys constitutes a DUI.
@@rdot8658 He drove to the Wendy's and fell asleep in the drive thru line he was so drunk. Its unfortunate hes dead but he should've handled it way differently.
This man blows my mind..Gonna listen to more of what he has to say it makes so much sense it's cathartic..
The problem is neoliberalism
Lou Mota 100%
Joe, the police were called because the employees at Wendy's just like many places have policies not to engage customers in such situations.
I think what certain places (I believe places like LA) want to implement is a community solution - have a community "guard" to approach nonaggressive, nonviolent criminals and solve the issue at hand.
I disagree with the approach, but it's what Joe was advocating
redwall1521 if they act like that with the cops they will with anyone
Don't think Rogan has gotten take-out in a long time
The actual policy is to ignore and let them go about their day. Lmfao
@@redwall1521 shut up
"completely peaceful and compliant"
"escalated into a tussle"
someone hasn't bothered to watch the full video evidence
Yep. Thanks Joe for interrupting him with misinformation and stopping his train of good thought. Thanks.
I think he has watched the video and I think Joe is a CIA gatekeeper.
Even if he was a great guy with no priors. Tell M.A.D.D. that you let a drunk driver go free.
I knew the segment was in trouble when Joe said "Mark Lamont Hill made a really good point."
The idea that a drunk driver is just a nice guy who made a little mistake is a very dangerious one, as is the notion that skin color should be seen as a factor. If the policy across the country was "be nice, de-escalate, call a rideshare, we would see a major increase in fatalities, much like we are seeing with retail theft.
6:35 - A non-violent person out on parole for felony violence? 🙄 Come on Joe, stop listening to Mark L Hill for starters.
Tbh I understand why this person should get arrested but I still do think they should prosecute people for drug use and dealing (only if there driving and causing a danger) and that if someone is driving they should try to either impound there car or make someone else in the car drive the car instead of the person intoxicated.
Everyone is so skilled with bringing up someone’s past in these cases, but get amnesia when the violent history of this country is mentioned.
Johnny Hammersticks not really a lot of the problems with illegal drugs and a lot of deaths behind them are because of them being illegal I would say most drug deaths would drop if they Juss controlled these substances more
Brandon Campbell - Because the acts he commit we’re done directly by him, not more than a few years ago. Blaming an entire people group for things done by other people generations ago, all that are no longer alive, is a textbook definition of racism. My family was not even in America during the time of slavery, some of them where the victims of racism.
Yeah I was going to finish this until Joe started talking about letting drunk drivers take an Uber home after they've been found drunk and asleep in the drive-thru...🙄
...while on parole for child abuse. Which is, being on parole, an automatic rearrest.
Was the guy in the Drive Thru lane?
Exactly wtf it's harmless until he fucking drives drunk on the wrong side of the freeway and kills Joe's family, I can't believe he justifys the guys behavior.
Clearly not Joe's greatest moment. Too much floating around in a dark pool and weed has fried his common sense portion of his brain.
This was a quality conversation. Can’t ask for anything more
Bret has the most accurate picture of what's happening. Refreshingly sane. I wish he had more influence.
Nope, he's wrong. The outrage comes in large part from the fact that everyone is depressed and anxious because of genetics. He speaks in very vague terms about what's wrong with our political system because he himself doesn't know.
@@squeakypistonproductions2228 Q anon zombie I see.
@@theobserver9131 What is qanon?
@@theobserver9131 Ive formulated this opinion by researching the cause of todays chronic illness epidemic. Things like reviews and havard journal posts support my claim. Ever heard of dysgenetics? Its a real field in biology. Actual science. What an odd accusation.
@@squeakypistonproductions2228 My guy, you would be a fan of The Natural Law Institute, as am I. You can find them on YT.
The next time I am being arrested, I must try that... “Get me an Uber”. 😂😂😂
It's really at the cop's discretion
Joe "Drunk driving is not that bad" Rogan
Tell that to my 3 dead friends.
@@andrewthomas5769 I'd rather have one cool guy that is man enough to drive a car while at 4+ alcohol perthousand blood than any of your kind. Spoiled, yelling, selfish, no idea what dignity means.
TheSphongleface what the hell
@@ryunz9639 Yep, the new generation is utter useless.
TheSphongleface I don't believe he's taking your side
Hey Joe, I was listening until about 15:30. That's when you opened the door to replace facts with interpretation. Maybe, you might want to watch this interview : Thomas Sowell, on The Legacy of Slavery. That is a good place to start.
All that training requires
F U N D I N G!
Not defunding..
More training, More education... absolutely!
Joe...Joe..you don't get out of a DUI by saying "Call me an Uber."
I've never been more sure Joe Rogan regularly drives drunk and gets off for being famous in my life.
Sempi10 that was really the dumbest shit I’ve heard from someone mouth . My uncle was killed by drunk driver while working on the road
Joe cant be serious, the cops are gonna call you an Uber if you're driving drunk? WTF
I used to drive with Uber and Lyft there was an occasion I had to pick up a guy from Waffle House and when I arrived it was two police officers who had ordered a ride for a drunk guy
Seems Joe may have smoked one too many.
Actually police do call uber for drunk people.
It’s a felony in many parts. You don’t call cabs for felons to be taken home.
I can’t even believe he said that! Tell that to the family members who is dead because of a drunk driver.
Don't let a focus on a few weeds convince you that the forrest is in danger.
So the solution is that the police should be a valet service for drunk drivers?
the solution is for cops to not murder people just for not obeying them
@@nathenism He didnt get shot for disobeying orders, he got shot for firing a taser at a police officer.
@@adtastic1533 where did the taser come from?
@@nathenism What does that have to do with it? He took it off the cop. Po po had a right to shoot him just for that.
@@adtastic1533 why? you probably don't even realize you are brainwashed into subconsciously believing we deserve to be slaves
JOE It’s ok to get drunk, drive, and fall asleep in a drive through, as long as you’re polite ROGAN
Joe, that's not how drunk driving works.
Joes talking shite as usual.
go ahead and walk home. the cops the leave. he sneaks back and drives off. this time in a rush and even more prone to have accident. tell that to the MADD groups that forced jail time and automatic arrest for BAC levels that keep dropping over the decades.
Ricky Parmar Again, that’s not how drunk driving works.
Joes saying if a drunk hit someone he loves take him out and talk to him call him a Uber. Cars are not deadly they are made of cotton candy. lol
I have to disagree. Joe is saying if a cop is handling a situation and the person being corrected for lack of a better word that another cop can step in and over ride his partner and negotiate with the criminal. By the way if you are not cooperating with the police and struggling or fleeing, that is a crime as defined by our courts. Jason
@6:30 Joe you obviously never lost someone from a drunk driver
(7:18) Joe, tell that to the families who have lost loved ones to DUI offenders. Alcohol DUI cases often result in injury or death.
And all those people would still be severely punished without DUI laws
I think Joe was trying to hit on the morality of it rather than the result
As someone who has duis and who no longer drinks (april 2nd 2019 - sober).. you are right. I feel blessed I didn't hurt anyone, the thing is ppl refuse to take responsibility for their own actions and never grow up to accept responsibility. I learned (took a couple tries bcuz I'm human and I'm dumb) but it's either grow up and learn or your bound to repeat the same mistakes again and again
@@finnancahill2644 He should have pointed out that a marijuana DUI often ends with bed time while alcohol DUIs end in death.
hochha I think joe sees the value in preventing dui cases through increasing community measures rather than punishing people who’ve already made the mistake
"Compliant"? He punched a cop. Are you insane, Joe?
@D D he drove drunk, so they were going to arrest him.
Joe is 100% wrong on this
He was a Angel poor Brooks he only abuse his children, he deserves pass... Justice for Brooks 😂
Proof?
@@deeznutz1498 TWAT
It’s crazy how things are playing out 3 years later coming off his most recent podcast
They reason that drunk guy at the drive through was was going to be arrested was because odds are that's not his first time drunk driving, what if they let him leave and he killed a whole family. Drunk driving is a very serious crime. Those cops were not aggressive, he was drunk behind the wheel and it was their job to arrest him. He fought not to go to jail, and in doing so made a very poor decision to try and take one of their weapons. If he had taken a gun instead of a taser those cops would have been dead. Yes it sucks when anyone dies, even if they are making very bad choices, but t.it was his choice to fight.
Anyone else getting the vibe that Joe probably drives drunk a lot?
Probably. But there is something to be said about how people are villainized for something that's rather subjective.
What is "drunk"? Is it .08 for everyone?
No. Some people at .08 aren't ganna have any problems. Whereas some are with even less alcohol. Before breathalyzers they would take you in if you were obviously drunk. When GW Bush got his you had to be absolutely slammered. Now, you're blind if you don't see how much it's about money and not public safety.
However, EVERYBODY knows you can't fight the cops so I have no sympathy for this particular character.
I live in Arizona, the strictest state in the union in regards to DUI's. Its ridiculously easy to get one. Do people still do it? Sure. But people just wanna go home. And people should be able to do so if there's no REAL reason to believe that they will cause an accident.
Giving up liberty for a false sense of security. But sure, it's all just to protect you...
david colley dude, he failed the sobriety tests and was clearly drunk out of his mind. It’s not that subjective, he fell asleep twice at the wheel
@@davidcolley4756 agreed but I'd say passing out in the drive-thru of a Wendy's is definitely drunk don't you think?
drunk and high from cocaine
"A zombified collective fighting a bogyman they have invented." Perfect quote.
Agreed, summarizes Trump's voter base perfectly . And if a democrat was in power it would be the same horseshit.
@@patrickdolan2876 - I think the bogyman would be all white heterosexual males. The democrats are not much better, if at all.
Not arresting drunk drivers and sending them to bed with a ticket is the dumbest idea ever lol. People have 10+ DWI’s, nobody cares about a ticket
Its gonna get bad, I feel it
Alot of people I know have also said they feel something big coming
@LJ Battlefield probably heading in the direction of the gulags under stalin. It will probably turn out that way if people are not carefull
He was over the limit and drove drunk he had a huge rap sheet.
Is that all you got out of that?
“Excuse me sir...you’ve just ran over a family in your drunken state. Can I get you an Uber?”
That has nothing to do with what happened in this case. Why are you so irrational?
Uhm this comment has everything to do with the video, Joe.
This comment is exaggerated so that we can see the contradiction. BUT People miss the fact that Joe gave very specific conditions for the whole "Instead of arresting you" idea. I'm not going to put it here, just re-watch the segment.
Are you trolling?
The guy wasn't driving, he was sleeping. He only drove when the police told him to move his car. Joe was talking about getting an Uber. Police in other countries find drunk people and are happy to drive them around the corner.
This isn’t what people are saying at all, Jesus chriiiiiist
Basics: Term limits. Accountability. Constitutionality. Both parties need to be brought to justice.
I don't believe I have ever heard a more ignorant conversation in my life.
ditto. both of them are dead wrong
Try to be more specific
T J Would you care to elaborate? A lot is covered in 24 minutes lol which conclusion are they dead wrong about? All of them?
One conclusion which is drawn is that our current system facilitates continued suffering. So if one generation of a family is suffering, the odds are great that the following generation of that family will suffer too. Are they “dead wrong” about that? In other words, do you think upward mobility is made EASIER by our current set of laws?
I see again people that don't understand policing and need to back them 100 percent. When someone resist arrest they are putting the officers life at risk. The incident in Atlanta could have been avoided simply by the criminal copying with the officer. If the officer didn't arrest him and he drove off and killed someone the officer himself would be in trouble. These police experts need to shut up period about policing unless they have actually done it. That means Joe Rogan is absolutely pandering to the left.
Emotions and feelings should never override logic and reasoning.
I think too many of these people don’t realise that logic and reasoning can factor in the feelings of people as variables, except that then makes it clear that the one arguer’s feelings of indignation count for very little when considering the feelings of the many
True, but logic and reasoning wouldn't solve this issue. People are not ready to listen to this logic and reasoning because the system was built on false Logic and reasoning. It was build by suppressing the emotions, feelings and humanity of a group of people.
You have now to fix this broken emotions and feelings by showing understanding and Love and compromising.
But clearly that will not happen 😂. Well civil war is inevitable. It is begun and it won't stop until a compromise is made for everyone. The American experience is getting old and broken.
kumchu Elsen, you’re right in that the problem is that discourse has become too emotional, not that there’s simply a reasoning error about emotions. I can’t really see much stopping the zombified mob who’ve switched off to reason
Unfortunately a large majority of America baxe their lives around Emotions and Feelings AKA Religion!
Good logic and reasoning take into account the emotional reactions of other people and how one's emotions unconsciously affect one's own logic.
Damn Joe, I usually agree with you, but a program to call a freaking Uber. Do you know how many innocent people are killed by drunk drivers every year. Damn that was dumb!!!
agreed
He didn’t say he was in favour of drunk driving. He said he’s in favour of allocating the police to serious crime with alternatives for non immediate threats.
@@dicerevo Someone drunk behind the wheel of a 5000 pound vehicle is an immediate threat. Cops should not be tasked with taking responsibility for other people's bad decisions. You are responsible for your own decisions. Every day, almost 30 people in the United States die in drunk-driving crashes - that's one person every 50 minutes. If you decide to drive while drunk you not deserve a free uber to get you home. You deserve to be punished.
@@dicerevo *Drink driving ISN'T an immediate threat…???*
When I was 5 a drunk driver plowed into my friends, as they stood right next to me, at 40 MPH! He literally almost killed them! So maybe we have much different opinions on how to treat drunk drivers.
I thought I was the only one thinking this
Brett "I'm a leftist" Weinstein got the same thing right that every single conservative in America got right and is preeeettty proud of himself.
Who’s Brett Weinstein
Yeah I don't know wtf I would do if this guy I've never heard of didn't tell me what I already knew.
No kidding. It takes the most intelligent outliers of the "acedemic" community to see the patterns that everybody not in "acedemia" see immediately.
yeah, and he's still spouting systemic racism and white privilege
@@marcus8710 not surprisingly. The elite academia was certain the communist russia would surpass and last longer than the usa. One man out of a small college and joined the airforce, stated against all the intellects that the ussr would fall and it was a hell hole. Turns out that man was right and his name was ronald reagan. No marxist to this day applauds the ussr.
When you drive drunk, you go to jail. Period. Remember, drunk drivers aren’t only risking their life, they are risking the lives of everyone else on the road. RIP Micheal, 19 y/o killed by a drunk driver on his way home from practice.
Joe “don’t charge people with DUI’s” Rogan
*Then don't attack police officers and fire their own weapons at them.*
*If you did that to me, I'D SHOOT YOU*
Killukwik you should be so ashamed of yourself.
@Killukwik They didn't kill a drunk driver, they killed a man who assaulted police
He sort of missed the boat on that one... I suspect he was kicking himself right after getting off the air and thinking through what he said.
Stu Saville they shot a man running away... good cop training right?
Imagine thinking someone passed out drunk in their running car shouldn't be arrested.
That then attacks and beats up two cops and tries to tase another.
G
wowczcams.com/video/oT6aLBBRhGA/video.html
Also forget the taser even -punch an officer in the head, pretty much any country in the world you're in deeeep shit
John Scott John Scott has obviously never been to any other first world country
Rogan has been in one to many fights. Its that, or maybe devils weed does damage the brain.
When people lose everything they lose it. Everybody knows.
Anchor Steam is better for branding on the Brand Blvd of Cars, Motorcycle and Rv's
Man, i've seen videos where that guy rocked 2 cops and then stole their taser. You can say they shouldn't have shot him dead, but you can't say that man was compliant.
The cops were nice as possible
@@kris3451 right. until he didn't get that uber get out of jail free card he was asking for. same statement
If you offer him an Uber for a dui you’re enabling people to drink and drive.
Lol. I was offered the same thing by a Maryland trooper. I was left go with a warning. Brooks was parked. Just saying. It happens cops do that all the time.
Like the police officer is going to arrest his buddy because he got the drunk guy an Uber? They murder people and show up to work the next day.
Ya Joe is out to lunch on Brooks situation. Here in Wisconsin where we have a huge drunk driving problem, the only thing that seems to effectively deter it is escalating the consequences. The police arresting drunk drivers is almost universally agreed on by the public.
If you give him a 5k dollar fine you arent enabling him
Daniel Alveo he was not ‘parked’. He was passed out in the driveway blocking other drivers that’s why the cops were called so they could move him.
can't just have a free driving drunk uber if you get caught Joe ...
Comply don't die. Don't drink and drive.
Joe should try make that ‘nothing wrong’ argument with the parents of everyone killed by a drunk driver.
Also, a DUI arrest isn't a 'go to jail' offense for most people. They arrest you, process you, and usually release you the same night. Rayshard's problem was that he was on probation (he was released due to COVID-19) and a DUI arrest on probation means his probation would probably be revoked and he somehow thought fighting the cops would solve that problem.
Exactly. I had a DUI and I was very nice a cooperative during the process. It cost me a lot of money but it made me a better man.
Amen, its against the the law to drive drunk. "Who called the cops on him"? Really joe? He was past out in a drive thru if maybe knowone calls the authorities maybe he drives and kills someone. Thats why. And as cordial as he was so were the police in this case. Take your medicine if you fuck up, and he wasnst a saint just got of jail wit this pity party america is in right now.
He was compliant and had no problem with getting an Uber. If every drunk person would be arrested, Dublin would be empty.
exactly!
Why do they keep showing this Biden ad: “I’m coming to you for to ask a quick favor”. Seriously that’s the best take they had? Smfh.
THANK YOU - I literally thought the same thing. Imagine what the other takes sounded like!
Thank you! I've been saying this since they rolled it out. The scary part is, that was their best take. That was the best they could get him to perform. 😬
Rogan had something to do with that lol
@@evildead311 If he did that would be badass!! hhehe
I PRAY for a live televised debate : Biden vs. Trump!
Joe "I've been in California so long I can't form a rational thought" Rogan.
The core problem, generally, is not policing or "police brutality". It's the disregard of the law and lack of respect of law enforcement that has become far too common these days. The common denominator with these deaths of individuals are their decisions to resist arrest, grab an officer's weapon, or take some other action that forces law enforcement to respond in a potentially lethal manner to defend themselves or the public. This is easily avoided by complying with law enforcement. If the arrest is improper, no one will win that argument in the field--- you challenge it in the courtroom.
"You're not a bad person who's gonna hurt someone"
That guy: *charged with child abuse*
Correction: That guy CONVICTED of child abuse.
This was the only time I think Joe was way off.
Yeah, smh on that one... someone driving behind the wheel intoxicated needs serious repercussions. Whether they’re arrested is one question, but to say that they should merely get a ticket isn’t severe enough imo.
Not a bad guy? Tell that to people who have lost loved ones to drunk drivers. Should have gotten an uber before.
L3f7S1d3 acquaintance of mine drove drunk, speeding down the street, and crashed into a man on his way home at night and killed him.
When a drunk driver hits and kills someone you love, you'll change your tune Joe.
Michael Valente yeah they get charged with involuntary man slaughter
@Michael Valente What's the percentage of drunk drivers/total drivers per day and sober drivers/total drivers per day?
Michael Valente what kind of backwards logic is that? Drunk driving is extremely reckless behavior. When you drink and drive you’re necessarily impaired and thus pose a significant threat to others. Sober drivers can easily be negligent or even reckless with their driving, and yes, kill others. but they’re not automatically impared from the get-go. It’s not the same level of risk.
@Michael Valente says the guy that has to blow into a machine to start his car 🤣
Michael Valente bro you’re an idiot. You can get charged with vehicular manslaughter if you kill someone in a car crash and it wasn’t a complete accident. And if you’re on your phone or something you do get charged with a crime. Because that shit is illegal.
I've been arrested a couple of times for DUI years ago , I wasn't passed out or driving erratic, I was stopped at roadblocks. I didn't fight the police, I broke the law so I went to jail & paid my fine. I DAMN sure didn't ask for a Taxi!!??
What good is law enforcement if the ones breaking the law get to dictate the outcome???
This was very informative… And yet, quite frightening.
A drunk driver is not trying to hurt people? Really Joe Rogan? That's what you're going with?
Check MADD (Mother Against Drunk Driving) twitter feed. Crickets (except for all the comments wondering why they haven't mentioned it like they do all drunk driving cases)
Was he driving drunk or drunk and asleep in a drive thru... There's a huge difference,drunk driving can kill people but sleeping in a drive thru just pisses people off.
Drunk driving in itself is a victimless crime unless someone or something is damaged, hurt, or killed which is already a crime. We shouldn't drive drunk bc it's stupid and dangerous but lots of legal things are stupid and dangerous. No victim = no crime should be the basis for all law. Going away from this is going toward fascism and away from autonomy and freedom even if it makes the world less safe. The amount of damage/income destruction and cost due to DUI laws are far more damaging overall then the relatively few tragic accidents caused by it. It manufactures criminals in order for a false sense of safety with little actual safety created compared to the negative effects created. Fines and loss of license? Sure. Jail time? That's just excessive.
Aww someones whiteness is hurt
He was sleep in the car & either way the police are to detain not kill. Black people are mad because our tax dollars pay for police who don't detain so you Can have a day in court...you just "magically" end up dead & we talking old,young,men,women & children
"He's not a bad guy" says Joe about the child abuser who was drunk driving.
Living in the shit hole he does rots your mind after a while.
Because he doesnt know about the criminal history. Because he doesnt take into account the fact that he stole a taser. Question is does he know, im guessing no which is why its not covered.
And who hit a cop, stole his taser and tried to use it on him. Seriously, I wish people would stop trying to make martyrs out of scumbags.
Because CNN didn't tell him and he's irresponsible with his power.
The cops name is Garrett Rolfe he has 12 complaints against him one of which is for improper use if his firearm. He has been charged with murder. THIS is your hero if so why? When he gets convicted and becomes a felon will you have as much contempt or will this felon be different. If you are for law and order then you should support the charges this is the same justice system that found Rayshard guilty or will it be different then. For many of you commenting this is absolutely about race and you absolutely are racists and you use alot of language and pretence to cover it up. I would be better if you stopped using law and order language and just say what you really mean. It has become increasingly clear even if you are still lying to yourselves.
Drinking and driving should be taken seriously.
"This was just a guy who fucked up."
You know how many people die from drunk drivers?
One of my good friends in high school was hit head on with both cars moving at least 55 mph at 4am while he was on his way to work. It was less than a year after graduation.. he was only 20 years old.
The driver of the other car was wasted. The steering wheel of my friend's car was less than an inch from the drivers seat after the impact.
They had to pull his lifeless body out of that car with the jaws of life. His chest and stomach were crushed. He died alone in his car at 4am because someone got behind the wheel like Rayshard Brooks did.
I had another friend who WAS a drunk driver and died in much the same way.. actually on the same stretch of road.
Later in my life, I was one of those stupid people who got an OWI. I complied and took my punishment.. I didn't fight them and they treated me with respect.. way more respect than I deserved considering how dangerous it is to drink and drive.
I could have killed someone.. just slapping someone on the wrist, and getting them an Uber is dumb as shit.
Drunk driving is no joke, and we arrest people who do it for a very good reason.
When does the personal responsibility discussion start? Most of what I've heard so far is making excuses for stupid decisions when the perpetrator is black.