Uhh hey I agree but umps are human too just saying cause sometimes refs will miss obvious calls (no pi call in the nfc championship game) yeah soo don't say that cause maybe you be a u ump for awhile and see how hard it is.
At least somebody agrees with me saying that they're humans just like the rest of us and we all make mistakes so we shouldn't be crushing anybody for at all finally my type of crowd other than that sometimes my God some of these rules that they have to follow as officials that's ridiculous how large of robux do they have to follow woof is how bad that is man. If nobody cares about my opinions I'm fine with that but don't crush me like I'm not a human being just like the rest of you plus I'm trying to stay positive and I'm not in the mood for negativity in my life anymore. Goodbye have a nice day wherever you are and stay safe stay humble and see you next time.
I do agree that he was out as the rule is written but that was a goofy way to determine if a receiver is out or not. It would be like saying something didn't dive into a swimming pool because his toe bumped the edge of the pool.
@@Alxnick what's the difference between a player's foot coming down out of bounds and his hand coming down out of bounds, when it's the first thing to make contact with the ground? If the suddenly changed the rule and said "well, hands don't count" then literally everyone would go apoplectic as soon as the rule went against their team
The first call the Antonio Brown OOB Dez Bryant, the obstruction at 3rd, there are a lot of good calls in these clips. Not sure about calls that changed the game, or actions that changed the outcome.
The worst call in sports history is probably against Gallarraga, completely blowing a perfect game. For reference: over the 140 years of Major League Baseball history, and over 235,500 games played, there have been 23 official perfect games. That's just how rare this event is and it was completely blown on the last out of the game....
1:18 I'm not even a baseball fan, but I'll never forget this call to take away the perfect game. Always wished the MLB could have made an exception and just put it down as one anyways
Horrible call. But the level of class with Jim Joyce (ump) and andres (pitcher) in the aftermath was the definition of professionalism. Again though, horrible call
I'm not a baseball fan and because of this, Gallaraga is the only pitcher I can name regarding perfect games. That "perfect game" is more infamous than any real perfect game is famous.
@@ExtremeSquared plus it was the 27th out, and he immediately got out 28. Everyone with the slightest knowledge of this game agrees it was a perfect game.
One of those calls that every sports fan in North America, if over 10 years old at the time, would remember, still curious what the TRUE reasoning of Jim Joyce was internally on that one...
@@zebraneighbor6383 well I know whenever Iâve been safe when I played I never put my hands on my head in surprise lol so I think even the runner knew he was out
@@jakeheerwagen8007 He's surprised by the call, that's for sure, but he's more just shocked that he got so lucky. He's not upset at being safe. He just can't believe it.
@@dustypier3835 If he was upset he wouldn't have taken that call so gladly. Why would you ever be upset at an umpire giving you a break? What, you think he was rooting for the Tigers? He wouldn't have tried to run to first base.
I love that one cause karma came back and hit the Saints hardcore. They were doing it to every team that year and then boom it comes back and cost them the game. I loved every second of it.
That perfect game being ruined is the worst by far. If it's even a close call at that point how do you not just call the out? Having called him out and being wrong has way less ramifications than calling him safe and ruining a perfect game
Totally agree. Iâm not risking it if Iâm Jim Joyce - thatâs once in a lifetime stuff right there (if youâre lucky)! If itâs close, Iâm calling out. To his credit, Jim Joyce handled it well, but still just such a terrible mistake. Iâm not even a tigers fan and Iâve never been more mad at an official in any sport. Never shouldâve happened.
@@drugsmadilla Politely disagree. A perfect game is just that. 27 up, and 27 down. 26 has not yet earned it. Not if the runner seems to have beaten it out. Tough situation for Jim Joyce regardless.
@@martyklestadt6766 I'm saying that if it's the last out of a perfect game, I'd error on the side of calling someone out and giving the game to the pitcher vs the other way around
Let's hope it happens. I'm just happy that Gallaraga and Jim Joyce have become friends, with Jim Joyce publicly expressing his apologies for the call. There's not a day he probably doesn't think about it.
I have no issue with refs or umpires making mistakes. Weâre all human. But today, those mistakes should be rectified by instant replay, viewable from multiple angles.
yea i don't know why some plays are not reviewable seems really stupid to go off a judgement call when you have cameras covering every possible angle with slow mo
@@bigstopowens If you want every play to be reviewable the games would slow to such a pace that they would be even harder to watch than they are now. And I would disagree with the other comment that every possible angle is covered. That is simply not true. Take the angle of the football looking like it was "clearly" inside the goal post. Was it really? Or did it appear that it was because of the angle? Perfection isn't the goal. Excellence is.
Unless itâs a play that will completely effect who wins the game it shouldnât. Hockey has been plagued by such reviewing and it really ruins the pace.
@@greathoonta3461 Well now hereâs where the problems really arise. Almost every play can affect the outcome of a game. I understand your point. And I completely agree with you. Replays should be limited. Challenge as many plays as you want until you lose the challenge. Then youâre done for the remainder of the quarter, period, or half.
6:44 *I actually agree with that play.* He got tripped-up by the player on the _other team,_ if he didnât, then he wouldâve made it. So, I think itâs fair call.
It's absolutely the right call, there's a few of these on there like the Auburn-LSU one or some NBA buzzer beaters. Also the ump who made the obstruction call is Jim Joyce, the same one who blew the perfect game call. He's on that World Series crew for a reason, they made the right call and seemed to get the explanation to the teams/fans in a pretty orderly fashion all things considered.
@@isolated_rewind2058 6:49 the team _still_ had to *catch* the ball, and when the player tried running to home, the third baseman lifted his legs and tripped him up
Second clip was quite literally the WORST CALL EVER. One of many by Jim Joyce. Sad part is, the commissioner's office has the power to overturn the call back then and refused (precedent for that is the Pine Tar Incident). It would not have affected any statistics in a way that would have altered anything, just given a kid a perfect game.
The difference between the Pine Tar rule and Joyce's blown call is that the pine tar thing was determined to be an incorrect application of the rule, while Joyce was "a judgment call." Same reason why the Orioles couldn't do anything beyond filing a protest when Jeffrey Maier reached over the wall in the playoffs. They won't reverse a judgment call. But with the pine tar, they ruled in the Royals favor because Billy Martin had basically tried to loophole the rule, it wasn't in place for competition reasons. It was a holdover from the days when they had way less balls and didn't want the pine tar getting on them because it was spread higher on the bat.
@@inarar5334 the pine tar thing is actually even more interesting than that. The umpires applied the rule correctly, it was just a super outdated rule that was never about competitive advantage. And 8 years before there was a similar ruling on a protest also involving the Royals, also with the same idea that it was an outdated rule and a homer with a pine tar bat was allowed. And of course in true MLB fashion it took them until 2010 to actually change the rule where a team has to challenge the bat before it gets used. And yeah judgement calls don't get overturned, and I think the MLB actually removed the protest from games a few years ago so we won't get another Pine Tar Game again.
@@inarar5334 interesting, thank you. What about if Joyce just said like I had a brain fart, I meant to say safe, can he reverse the call? Or if another ump comes over and says I saw that he was safe? Basically was (pre replay era) there anyway to change the call on the field once joyce called out?
@@jasonanno3881 I think that if the ump who makes the call immediately reverses it, or if another ump does come over and say they saw it the other way, yes. If I remember the Joyce blowing the perfect game incident correctly, he was the only one in position with nobody else with a better angle. He just blew it "honestly" and in real time, and didn't learn he was wrong until he saw the tape himself. It's the exact kind of scenario they finally caved on limited replay review to combat.
I still don't know why the league wouldn't reverse the call. With 2 outs in the 9th, it's the perfect scenario to do so. For the moment between when he stepped on the bag and the call was made the game was over.
Great video! I misread the title and thought it meant calls that resulted in rule changes permanently altering the sport, which would also be a cool video.
On that play, Carlos Gomez reached over the wall to rob a homerun off the bat of Joey Votto; however, in all of the excitement, never showed the baseball to anyone (at least not right away), which led Votto to believe that maybe Gomez didn't catch that ball after all.
Pretty sure that wasn't even the end of the game when Crabtree pushed off in the Raiders/Chiefs game. I feel like that's the same game where the Chiefs got a PI penalty the next play, and then the Raiders scored the game winning TD on a free play
That Raiders call against the Chiefs did not change the game. They would still end up getting a touchdown after a few defensive holding calls and untimed downs.
How did the video not include the fail mary? I was at the game celebrating my birthday, and my first/only packers game i've been to. My dad who was a seattle fan even told me "don't worry about it they have to overturn that call there's no way that was a td"
As a Seahawks fan I feel for you. Totally should have been called for the Packers. Im not saying that im not happy that the call went our way, Just that it should have gone the other.
WHERE THE HELL IS THE 2004 CALGARY NO GOAL FROM THE CUP FINALS???????? for those of you that don't know, the flames got the puck in the net in tampa's net in GAME 7 of the finals but the ref's didn't review the play and it didn't count. So when Calgary should've won the cup, they didn't
Game 6 in overtime to be specific. Tb won later in ot to send it back to Tampa for the 7th game. Yes the puck was in the air over the goal line. But the goal did not get counted even with a few clear angles.
How would you feel if hockey implemented a basketball style rule where if someone shoots and the puck is in the air before time runs out and goes in without touching the ground or a player, it would be a goal? I don't see why not.
2:08 The second clip of the kick is unreliable, as the angle is off and the height of the ball above the post gives the illusion that it was on the inside of the post. The first clip shows that the kick missed by a HAIR.
I'm a Cowboy fan, and the first play here was correct. His hand hit out of bounds, so not a catch. Dez got screwed on some other catches (including the one against Green Bay shown later), but this catch against the Giants, he landed out of bounds. In the catch that they took away from him against Green Bay, I'm convinced it was a catch. I'm not sure it would have won the game, because I think it leaves Dallas with 1st and goal, and even assuming they score a TD, it's a one point lead. A 3 point lead if they also make a 2 point conversion. Green Bay had been moving the ball well, Aaron Rodgers was playing very well, and there would have been nearly 4 minutes left, so plenty of time for them to get at least a field goal, and possibly a TD. Regardless, "Dez caught it". He caught the ball, and took 3 steps with it, switching hands to try and stretch out to the end zone. That's a catch, and the Cowboys should have been given the chance to play it out. The second play shown, the ump just plain decided that he wasn't going to let the pitcher have a perfect game. No matter what it took. That wasn't even close, and he knew it. The ump should have been kicked out of baseball for that. Perfect games are so incredibly rare, and the ump just decided "No, screw him". The batter was out by 3 or 4 feet.
Rule 8, section 1, article 3, item 4 of 2014 NFL rules book: . If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control of it, it is a catch, provided that the player continues to maintain control. Ball touched the ground, Briant does not maintain control, therefore it's an incomplete pass
Cowgirl fans are the biggest crybabies in the US. It was not a catch against GB. They explained it, but Cowgirl fans I guess are not smart enough to get it. Only Cowgirl fans thinks it was a catch.
Meh, cowboys were gifted a victory in the WC game just before Vs Detroit by the officials. Dallas didnât didnât deserve to be there in the first place (though yes, that was undoubtedly a catch)
in the LSU-Auburn one- "You can't tell if he's snapped it!" Ummm you can CLEARLY see the football on the ground with the clock at 0:00, then he snaps it. hahaha strange call there
In college, if the ball is over the upright, it is no good. In the NFL and high school, it is good. That was a bad angle for the camera since it was not directly under the right upright. The only one who truly knows the answer is the official standing directly underneath. I would've called no good as well.
@@The22ndDoctor I never knew about that comma/period thing until now!!! Thank you for filling me in on that! BTW, you are absolutely right about the ball being outside the goal.
In that Hornets/Magic game, the officials waved it off because they'd already decided there wasn't enough time for a catch and shoot in the time remaining, which was 0:00.3 (three tenths of a second). If anyone was at fault, it may have been the clock operator. That was a playoff game, one the Hornets did end up wining in overtime.
@@cristianvilla3737 Okay, it was seven tenths of a second. I did go back and watch the time, and the ball has clearly left Davis' hands when there are three tenths of a second left.
Rule 8, section 1, article 3, item 4 of 2014 NFL rules book: . If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control of it, it is a catch, provided that the player continues to maintain control. Ball touched the ground, Briant does not maintain control, therefore it's an incomplete pass
@@Tzoreol im guessing you're referring to the Green Bay game. How many times has a player ever caught the football with 2 hands, took two steps with the ball in both hands, and put the ball into one hand and reach for the endzone and it been called incomplete? Once. Dez Bryant. Since when is catching with two hands, taking multiple steps, and lunging for the end zone not a catch?
@@civilhate5876 Calvin Johnson pretty famously, also Jesse James game winner vs the Patriots. Cowboys fans are just huge babies. It was the correct call according to the rules.
@@Tzoreol Bryant maintained control the entire way through, Bryant shouldâve been ruled down by contact since his knee and arm touched. Even the nfl came out and said it was the wrong call idk how you can argue against the damn league itself đ
Funny how people never mention the horrible call that benefited the Saints not long before, the call that allowed them to be in the position to possibly win the game to start with. Refs should never decide games but that call was simply rectifying the previous horrible call.
@Benny Pit the Saints received many favorable non calls throughout the entire game before that missed PI. The non call is indeed terrible bit if it wasnât for at least 4 non calls that went in New Orleansâs favor the Rams would have probably had the game secured up to that point
@@bennypit4411 Any official who says (or even thinks) this should be immediately fired and banned from ever working in the sport again. Bad or missed calls are part of the game. You live with them. But an official should never make a make-up call. Ever. And I'm a Rams fan.
The fact that a majority of plays like this cannot be overturned is insane. Its to the point now that almost every call in baseball and football just needs to be reviewed immediately because the officiating can be so bad.
The Jessie James play was a catch as was the second Dez play. One of the reasons they need to bring back the touch down rule where you actually have to touch the ball to the ground.
The James play by rule is incomplete. I dont know why outside of Steelers fans anyone disagrees. The Steelers by the way are probably the one franchise with the most "curious" calls in their favor! James comes down and the ball CLEARLY moves no question. It just so happens Brady who owns them did it again. Otherwise it probably wouldnt even be talked about. Suprized the bs tuck rule isnt on here. I think all of the possession overturns in this video are wrong. I mean the nose of the ball has to cross on a run. But if you catch the ball in the end zone you have to complete a complete "football play"?
@@brianseneca3546 I am not a Steelers fan and it was stil a catch he had both feet on the ground, was in possession of the ball and made a football move. Having the ball come loose hitting the ground once he breaks the plane does not matter at that point. Even by the rules of the time it was a catch and a bad call by the officials.
I'm a 9er fan. Rookie George Kittle had a very similar play the following week and kept control of the ball as he forced his arms over the line for the TD. At the press conference after the game, a reporter asked him about his play and the similarity to what happened to Jesse James, and Kittle said that he had that play in his mind as he caught the ball and didn't want a repeat, that he wanted to get the catch right. So at least somebody was paying attention lol.
Votto thought the ball hit the back wall first before it was caught in Gomez's glove. It would have been a home run instead of an out. There was no slow-mo from what I saw outside of this video so the motion blur would make it tough to overturn.
How could you miss the worst no-call of all time: the Rams' Robey-Coleman annihilating Tommylee Lewis at the 5 yard line for a first down that would have probably led to a Saints win and appearance in the Super Bowl?
Announcers saying "You can't end a game that way" when ref's overturn a call on replay after time has expired is the most inane comment. They may as well be saying "You have to stick with a bad call at the end of the game"
I've seen plenty of running plays where it takes less than 10 seconds to unpile everyone, place the ball, and get the next snap off. The 10-second runoff because the refs called a TD and stopped the clock is rough to watch. Had they made the correct call, there is a chance that the offense could have run one more play for that last inch. But because the ref made an incorrect call, time is allowed to expire. Tough way to end a game.
Im new to American football, I didnt understand crap about this play. He was 1 yard short? And the ref said it couldn't try again cuz it had only 8 seconds left?
@@CanalBonomo So normally after a running play that does not result in a first down or touchdown, the clock continues running. Under ideal circumstances, the players would quickly line back up, the referees would place the ball and get set, and the offense could possibly get one last play in if all that happened in less than the 8 seconds remaining. In this case, the referees called a touchdown so the clock was stopped. After they determined that the play did not result in a touchdown, by rule there is a 10 second runoff because had they not stopped the clock for the TD, then the clock would have kept running anyway and that is the average amount of time it takes to reset after an unsuccessful running play. So by calling it a touchdown, it completely took away any chance the offense might have had to run a final play.
@@CanalBonomo Yep. They would've had to hurry because it takes some time to un-pile everyone and reset, but at least it would have been possible. Calling the TD guaranteed it was the last play because of the required time runoff.
I don't know whether it matters but the heel of his hand hits first then moer of his hand touches out of bounds. he appears to have the ball secured before the hand hits.
As a Cowboys fan, I legit had to skip over that clip from the Dez Bryant catch against Green Bay that was called back. Years later and it's still too painful.
@@RipTorn7 He was asking to see the ball, as proof that Gomez had caught it. Not sure why that one is on here, though--it wasn't a crazy call, just a great play.
The clock should have started on the deflection rather than on the catch. If the clock had started at that point the shot wouldn't have been released in time.
I'm not sure on that one either. The deflection occurs just after the time on this video turns to 12:05 and he releases the shot just after it turns to 12:07. Plus, the game clock starts before Ross catches it - it didn't seem to me that it started especially late. I don't actually agree with having enough evidence to overturn that shot. Let the teams decide the game in OT.
@@deja.vunathan my whole problem is he got the shot off in time with the game clock. If it started on the tip aka when it was supposed to he had the opportunity to shoot faster and make the basket.
Titans Ravens 2008 AFC Divisional Playoff Game when Baltimore snapped the ball 3 seconds after the play clock hit 0 to convert 3rd and 14 to get into FG range on the game-winning drive.
As improbable as it sounds, the call at 2:50 was likely correct. Even though this gets cited as an all-time missed call, Jerry Meals got it right. The catcher missed the tag. This play brought video review to the MLB, which is ironic since review may have actually confirmed it.
Yeah, after seeing the video it was a correct call. It indeed doesn't seem like the catcher applied the tag at all. But good that it did bring video review into play.
No he was tagged clearly. You can see from either angle he was touched by the glove with the ball. Jerry did NOT get it right. The catcher knows if he tagged the runner or not. So, clearly you don't know what you're talking about
@@raycebaker6875 No he wasn't. The second angle from the first base clearly shows the tags were missed. Pittsburg sure has a bad history will close calls with the Braves, 1992 NLCS. Go Braves!!!
Kinda funny how Stafford was never able to win a playoff game in Dumptroit in 12 seasons but wins a Superbowl his very 1st season with a different team. And MCDC is a 8itch, no wonder his husband left him and his Trans reassignment surgery is obvious.
2:55 that umpire was interviewed a few times after this call. He said that he never saw the catcher's glove actually touch the runner on the swipe, though it was close. He apologized for making what he deemed was "obviously the wrong call" a little bit after the game, but has since said after looking at better camera angles in higher definition, reversed course and has said he was right initially and is convinced that there's no actually contact between glove and runner.
Obvious solution is for catchers to avoid the swipe tag on a play like that; if I'm behind home plate I'm giving the guy a bear hug after tagging him in the chest
I remember cursing at my TV when the officials waved off the game winning basket by the Hornets' Baron Davis. However, the game was tied at the time, and the Hornets did wind up winning in overtime.
I remember that Seattle packers game. 1st half seahawks sacked Rodgers 7 times 2nd half not at all. That's because o line held as if thier lives depended upon it. Amazing slew of no calls. Lol.
@@camerontuma3526 That was not a catch. By the NFL rule at that time, he had to maintain possession all the way through the ground. The ball clearly popped up when he hit the gorund. No catch. Cry more, Cowgirls fan.
Bro let's be real sports r scripted for the most part... It's so obvious they're there strictly for entertainment purposes hell it even says it on the back of sports tickets lol... Sports r scripted and rigged big time.
2:47 bottom of the 19th inning, that ump was just ready to go home lol I refuse to believe this ump didnt do this on purpose knowing he was full of it.
Yeah that throw beat him by a mile in the Pittsburgh vs Atlanta game. But when the catcher went to tag him out, he clearly missed him!! He never tagged him out, that's exactly why he got up after sliding and touched home plate!!
At least, despite what Cowboy fans think, 0:16 was the correct call...2:39, from that angle it looks in, but from the original angle which is the better of the two it looks out...
True, though from the angle under the posts itâs impossible to tell, as we canât establish what point the ball is level with the post. They pause it momentarily, at 2:40 but that looks a fair bit short of the posts and itâs continuing to drift wider and wider.
@@The22ndDoctor indeed. This is what Iâm saying. If they had the camera located level with the post, itâd be clear. As theyâre at an angle, theyâre making a rather poor guess as to when itâs crossed the line and still canât tell how wide the ball is. đđŒ
I absolutely love that call just because it was against Detroit lol worthless disgusting fucking garbage city full of subhuman trash. They don't deserve to even have a baseball team.
It's funny, my comment got pushed next to a comment with the answer. When the defender touched the ball it started the clock which makes the shot too late.
Fail Mary was only about Tate's egregious OPI. He clearly, by rule, caught that ball. He established possession (simultaneous, but that counts) in the air, and was the first with two feet down. Missed OPI handed that game to Seattle, not an interception/possession call.
Should have that Cowboys/Lions Playoff game on here where the officials screwed the Lions by reversing a clear pass interference penalty, and costing them the game.
Thank you. I thought I was the only one who remembers that call! Also, how about the receiver running around without a helmet which is normally flagged and ejected?
You could never pay me enough to be a ref/umpire. Spend your life either breaking even when you were right (because you did your job) or screwing up everyone's year when you make a mistake.
Link to our merch: www.teamjesusbrand.com
TEAM JESUS!
Team Jesus!
team *you're
Amen
Amen!!
I understand that refs make mistakes, but good lord, MLB umpires are legally blind.
This is the most logical thing Iâve heard this week
Uhh hey I agree but umps are human too just saying cause sometimes refs will miss obvious calls (no pi call in the nfc championship game) yeah soo don't say that cause maybe you be a u ump for awhile and see how hard it is.
I don't watch that much mlb but I agree eyes in the umps head
MLB? Have you seen NFL refs
At least somebody agrees with me saying that they're humans just like the rest of us and we all make mistakes so we shouldn't be crushing anybody for at all finally my type of crowd other than that sometimes my God some of these rules that they have to follow as officials that's ridiculous how large of robux do they have to follow woof is how bad that is man. If nobody cares about my opinions I'm fine with that but don't crush me like I'm not a human being just like the rest of you plus I'm trying to stay positive and I'm not in the mood for negativity in my life anymore. Goodbye have a nice day wherever you are and stay safe stay humble and see you next time.
The first clip was absolutely the correct call. Itâs a tough break, but his hand was out of bounds
Dez Bryant will always be famous for the balls he DIDN'T catch.
I do agree that he was out as the rule is written but that was a goofy way to determine if a receiver is out or not.
It would be like saying something didn't dive into a swimming pool because his toe bumped the edge of the pool.
@@Alxnick what's the difference between a player's foot coming down out of bounds and his hand coming down out of bounds, when it's the first thing to make contact with the ground? If the suddenly changed the rule and said "well, hands don't count" then literally everyone would go apoplectic as soon as the rule went against their team
The first call the Antonio Brown OOB Dez Bryant, the obstruction at 3rd, there are a lot of good calls in these clips. Not sure about calls that changed the game, or actions that changed the outcome.
It certainly didn't "change the game" either
The worst call in sports history is probably against Gallarraga, completely blowing a perfect game. For reference: over the 140 years of Major League Baseball history, and over 235,500 games played, there have been 23 official perfect games. That's just how rare this event is and it was completely blown on the last out of the game....
Obviously before challenges were allowed, but Why the Umps didn't get together and override the original call, which is allowed, is a mystery to me
It's so crazy to me that the MLB won't go back and fucking reverse this. It was the literal final out, for fucks sake.
1:18 I'm not even a baseball fan, but I'll never forget this call to take away the perfect game. Always wished the MLB could have made an exception and just put it down as one anyways
Horrible call. But the level of class with Jim Joyce (ump) and andres (pitcher) in the aftermath was the definition of professionalism. Again though, horrible call
I'm not a baseball fan and because of this, Gallaraga is the only pitcher I can name regarding perfect games. That "perfect game" is more infamous than any real perfect game is famous.
@@ExtremeSquared plus it was the 27th out, and he immediately got out 28. Everyone with the slightest knowledge of this game agrees it was a perfect game.
@@ExtremeSquared dude youâre exactly right. I canât name that many pitchers with perfect games, but Iâll always remember Gallaraga
One of those calls that every sports fan in North America, if over 10 years old at the time, would remember, still curious what the TRUE reasoning of Jim Joyce was internally on that one...
I'm not even a baseball fan but hearing the "how is he safe" always hurts me
I love how the runner in Galleragaâs perfect game is even upset heâs safe
The runner isn't upset đ Quit fucking around.
@@zebraneighbor6383 well I know whenever Iâve been safe when I played I never put my hands on my head in surprise lol so I think even the runner knew he was out
@@jakeheerwagen8007 He's surprised by the call, that's for sure, but he's more just shocked that he got so lucky. He's not upset at being safe. He just can't believe it.
Nah he is legit upset by the call.
@@dustypier3835 If he was upset he wouldn't have taken that call so gladly. Why would you ever be upset at an umpire giving you a break? What, you think he was rooting for the Tigers? He wouldn't have tried to run to first base.
Bro HOW could you forget the pass-inference no-call between the Rams vs. Saints in 2017 in the NFC Championship game
Yeah
I love that one cause karma came back and hit the Saints hardcore. They were doing it to every team that year and then boom it comes back and cost them the game. I loved every second of it.
2018*
@@mrmixmaster2093 sorry 2018
@@noyou9379 Karma will get you back for your comment đ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ą
That perfect game being ruined is the worst by far. If it's even a close call at that point how do you not just call the out? Having called him out and being wrong has way less ramifications than calling him safe and ruining a perfect game
Totally agree. Iâm not risking it if Iâm Jim Joyce - thatâs once in a lifetime stuff right there (if youâre lucky)! If itâs close, Iâm calling out. To his credit, Jim Joyce handled it well, but still just such a terrible mistake. Iâm not even a tigers fan and Iâve never been more mad at an official in any sport. Never shouldâve happened.
I don't know; blowing it the other way would be giving someone a perfect game that they didn't earn. To me, that would be just as bad.
â@@martyklestadt6766it was the last out, at that point, he earned it
@@drugsmadilla Politely disagree. A perfect game is just that. 27 up, and 27 down. 26 has not yet earned it. Not if the runner seems to have beaten it out.
Tough situation for Jim Joyce regardless.
@@martyklestadt6766 I'm saying that if it's the last out of a perfect game, I'd error on the side of calling someone out and giving the game to the pitcher vs the other way around
It's awesome to see a mix of all these. More than just one sport
That catcher at 2:49 always gets me, the pure disbelief đ
he never tagged the runner
â@@TR-vr5pzhe did
It was the 19th inning Ump def just wanted to go to bedđ
There is a law school which has actually sent a brief to Manfred to try to get that safe call on the Gallaraga game overturned.
Let's hope it happens. I'm just happy that Gallaraga and Jim Joyce have become friends, with Jim Joyce publicly expressing his apologies for the call. There's not a day he probably doesn't think about it.
I have no issue with refs or umpires making mistakes. Weâre all human. But today, those mistakes should be rectified by instant replay, viewable from multiple angles.
yea i don't know why some plays are not reviewable seems really stupid to go off a judgement call when you have cameras covering every possible angle with slow mo
Dude didn't a friggin ump got expelled in the middle of a game due to making terrible calls?
@@bigstopowens If you want every play to be reviewable the games would slow to such a pace that they would be even harder to watch than they are now. And I would disagree with the other comment that every possible angle is covered. That is simply not true. Take the angle of the football looking like it was "clearly" inside the goal post. Was it really? Or did it appear that it was because of the angle? Perfection isn't the goal. Excellence is.
Unless itâs a play that will completely effect who wins the game it shouldnât. Hockey has been plagued by such reviewing and it really ruins the pace.
@@greathoonta3461 Well now hereâs where the problems really arise. Almost every play can affect the outcome of a game. I understand your point. And I completely agree with you. Replays should be limited. Challenge as many plays as you want until you lose the challenge. Then youâre done for the remainder of the quarter, period, or half.
6:44 *I actually agree with that play.* He got tripped-up by the player on the _other team,_ if he didnât, then he wouldâve made it. So, I think itâs fair call.
Ok but how do u move in .5 seconds plz explaine
It's absolutely the right call, there's a few of these on there like the Auburn-LSU one or some NBA buzzer beaters. Also the ump who made the obstruction call is Jim Joyce, the same one who blew the perfect game call. He's on that World Series crew for a reason, they made the right call and seemed to get the explanation to the teams/fans in a pretty orderly fashion all things considered.
Yeah sure he did
@@isolated_rewind2058 6:49 the team _still_ had to *catch* the ball, and when the player tried running to home, the third baseman lifted his legs and tripped him up
It's absolutely the right call.
I remember the Dez Bryant catch/No Catch. Crazy call
No Fail Mary that ended the replacement NFL refs?
Second clip was quite literally the WORST CALL EVER. One of many by Jim Joyce.
Sad part is, the commissioner's office has the power to overturn the call back then and refused (precedent for that is the Pine Tar Incident). It would not have affected any statistics in a way that would have altered anything, just given a kid a perfect game.
The difference between the Pine Tar rule and Joyce's blown call is that the pine tar thing was determined to be an incorrect application of the rule, while Joyce was "a judgment call." Same reason why the Orioles couldn't do anything beyond filing a protest when Jeffrey Maier reached over the wall in the playoffs. They won't reverse a judgment call. But with the pine tar, they ruled in the Royals favor because Billy Martin had basically tried to loophole the rule, it wasn't in place for competition reasons. It was a holdover from the days when they had way less balls and didn't want the pine tar getting on them because it was spread higher on the bat.
@@inarar5334 the pine tar thing is actually even more interesting than that. The umpires applied the rule correctly, it was just a super outdated rule that was never about competitive advantage. And 8 years before there was a similar ruling on a protest also involving the Royals, also with the same idea that it was an outdated rule and a homer with a pine tar bat was allowed. And of course in true MLB fashion it took them until 2010 to actually change the rule where a team has to challenge the bat before it gets used.
And yeah judgement calls don't get overturned, and I think the MLB actually removed the protest from games a few years ago so we won't get another Pine Tar Game again.
@@inarar5334 interesting, thank you. What about if Joyce just said like I had a brain fart, I meant to say safe, can he reverse the call? Or if another ump comes over and says I saw that he was safe? Basically was (pre replay era) there anyway to change the call on the field once joyce called out?
@@jasonanno3881 I think that if the ump who makes the call immediately reverses it, or if another ump does come over and say they saw it the other way, yes. If I remember the Joyce blowing the perfect game incident correctly, he was the only one in position with nobody else with a better angle. He just blew it "honestly" and in real time, and didn't learn he was wrong until he saw the tape himself. It's the exact kind of scenario they finally caved on limited replay review to combat.
I still don't know why the league wouldn't reverse the call. With 2 outs in the 9th, it's the perfect scenario to do so. For the moment between when he stepped on the bag and the call was made the game was over.
2019 SCF Game 5: The trip that I could see thousands of miles away while the four people who mattered and were on the ice couldn't.
yes it was a trip, but not game changing tho. Boston still had more than 9 min left in regulation.
@@wrenchedfoxbody wtf does that have to do with the missed call?
@@HoweyJR_ This video is about game-changing calls, that's what.
That Tigers đ call was brutal & would be overturned under review these days.
That was the play that convinced MLB to institute replay.
The first call on Dez was the correct call. He came down out of bounds.
Great video! I misread the title and thought it meant calls that resulted in rule changes permanently altering the sport, which would also be a cool video.
What was wrong with the final play of this video? 15:58 The runner was pointing like something happened...
On that play, Carlos Gomez reached over the wall to rob a homerun off the bat of Joey Votto; however, in all of the excitement, never showed the baseball to anyone (at least not right away), which led Votto to believe that maybe Gomez didn't catch that ball after all.
@@freezer8530 thank you, I was confused also.
thanks for the clarification because I was confused đđ
Same.
Pretty sure that wasn't even the end of the game when Crabtree pushed off in the Raiders/Chiefs game. I feel like that's the same game where the Chiefs got a PI penalty the next play, and then the Raiders scored the game winning TD on a free play
That Raiders call against the Chiefs did not change the game. They would still end up getting a touchdown after a few defensive holding calls and untimed downs.
will never forget the fail mary. it had the weirdest aura ever. no one had any clue what just happened. as a young packers fan i was heartbroken :/
How did the video not include the fail mary? I was at the game celebrating my birthday, and my first/only packers game i've been to. My dad who was a seattle fan even told me "don't worry about it they have to overturn that call there's no way that was a td"
As a Seahawks fan I feel for you. Totally should have been called for the Packers. Im not saying that im not happy that the call went our way, Just that it should have gone the other.
WHERE THE HELL IS THE 2004 CALGARY NO GOAL FROM THE CUP FINALS????????
for those of you that don't know, the flames got the puck in the net in tampa's net in GAME 7 of the finals but the ref's didn't review the play and it didn't count. So when Calgary should've won the cup, they didn't
Game 6 in overtime to be specific. Tb won later in ot to send it back to Tampa for the 7th game. Yes the puck was in the air over the goal line. But the goal did not get counted even with a few clear angles.
from videos i have watched the puck didn't cross and that something called "the parallax view" gave the illusion that it had
Jesse James scored you Tom BradyNFL Tards
I remember that game the refs later reviewed it and said it crossed the line but since the already had play continued the couldnât change it
How would you feel if hockey implemented a basketball style rule where if someone shoots and the puck is in the air before time runs out and goes in without touching the ground or a player, it would be a goal? I don't see why not.
Please tell me you're making a part 2 to this. These are great and I'm sure that there are a lot of other moments like this out there.
How do you mess up a field goal call?
2:08 The second clip of the kick is unreliable, as the angle is off and the height of the ball above the post gives the illusion that it was on the inside of the post. The first clip shows that the kick missed by a HAIR.
You are 100 percent correct my friend. Great eyes by the refs
I had to scroll way too long to find this comment, but that is exactly what I was thinking when I first saw this clip.
Surprisingly most of these are actually the correct call
I'm a Cowboy fan, and the first play here was correct. His hand hit out of bounds, so not a catch. Dez got screwed on some other catches (including the one against Green Bay shown later), but this catch against the Giants, he landed out of bounds.
In the catch that they took away from him against Green Bay, I'm convinced it was a catch. I'm not sure it would have won the game, because I think it leaves Dallas with 1st and goal, and even assuming they score a TD, it's a one point lead. A 3 point lead if they also make a 2 point conversion. Green Bay had been moving the ball well, Aaron Rodgers was playing very well, and there would have been nearly 4 minutes left, so plenty of time for them to get at least a field goal, and possibly a TD. Regardless, "Dez caught it". He caught the ball, and took 3 steps with it, switching hands to try and stretch out to the end zone. That's a catch, and the Cowboys should have been given the chance to play it out.
The second play shown, the ump just plain decided that he wasn't going to let the pitcher have a perfect game. No matter what it took. That wasn't even close, and he knew it. The ump should have been kicked out of baseball for that. Perfect games are so incredibly rare, and the ump just decided "No, screw him". The batter was out by 3 or 4 feet.
Dez dropped it
Rule 8, section 1, article 3, item 4 of 2014 NFL rules book: . If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control of it, it is a catch, provided
that the player continues to maintain control.
Ball touched the ground, Briant does not maintain control, therefore it's an incomplete pass
Cowgirl fans are the biggest crybabies in the US. It was not a catch against GB. They explained it, but Cowgirl fans I guess are not smart enough to get it. Only Cowgirl fans thinks it was a catch.
@@Tzoreol except he took 3 steps so it woulda been a fumble if anything. the NFL came out and said it was a catch.
I am very much not a fan of the Cowboys and I'm convinced that was a catch against Green Bay.
That Dez Bryant vs GreenBay still hurts my sole. Especially when they changed it to fair catch.
Meh, cowboys were gifted a victory in the WC game just before Vs Detroit by the officials. Dallas didnât didnât deserve to be there in the first place (though yes, that was undoubtedly a catch)
A true soul rending robbery.
in the LSU-Auburn one- "You can't tell if he's snapped it!" Ummm you can CLEARLY see the football on the ground with the clock at 0:00, then he snaps it. hahaha strange call there
And even if the ball is snapped, there are dudes moving all over the place so it would be a false start anyways.
And if that's not a false start, it for sure is illegal motion.
Fantastic compilation!
2:39
That football game should be in second overtime
That kick was good
I think it missed
In college, if the ball is over the upright, it is no good. In the NFL and high school, it is good. That was a bad angle for the camera since it was not directly under the right upright. The only one who truly knows the answer is the official standing directly underneath. I would've called no good as well.
Watch the actual kick. pause it at 2:13 and use comma/period keys to frame step. You'll see it is outside the goal.
@@The22ndDoctor I never knew about that comma/period thing until now!!! Thank you for filling me in on that!
BTW, you are absolutely right about the ball being outside the goal.
In that Hornets/Magic game, the officials waved it off because they'd already decided there wasn't enough time for a catch and shoot in the time remaining, which was 0:00.3 (three tenths of a second). If anyone was at fault, it may have been the clock operator. That was a playoff game, one the Hornets did end up wining in overtime.
Bro go back and watch the time
@@cristianvilla3737 Okay, it was seven tenths of a second. I did go back and watch the time, and the ball has clearly left Davis' hands when there are three tenths of a second left.
Its good to see that the "calls that changed the game" arent all bad. Great call between the Dolphins and the Steelers against Antonio Brown.
That cowboys green bay call against bryant is still the worst playoff robbery I've ever seen.
Poor Dez! Dude has the greatest catches that never happened
Rule 8, section 1, article 3, item 4 of 2014 NFL rules book: . If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control of it, it is a catch, provided
that the player continues to maintain control.
Ball touched the ground, Briant does not maintain control, therefore it's an incomplete pass
@@Tzoreol im guessing you're referring to the Green Bay game.
How many times has a player ever caught the football with 2 hands, took two steps with the ball in both hands, and put the ball into one hand and reach for the endzone and it been called incomplete?
Once. Dez Bryant. Since when is catching with two hands, taking multiple steps, and lunging for the end zone not a catch?
@@civilhate5876 Calvin Johnson pretty famously, also Jesse James game winner vs the Patriots. Cowboys fans are just huge babies. It was the correct call according to the rules.
Catch the balls inbound or actually complete the catch and they would get called accordingly. Don't hate the game rule, hate the sub-par player.
@@Tzoreol Bryant maintained control the entire way through, Bryant shouldâve been ruled down by contact since his knee and arm touched. Even the nfl came out and said it was the wrong call idk how you can argue against the damn league itself đ
Clicking on this video, I instantly thought of the rams/saints DPI call. Looking back, it is still the worst call I have ever seen.
That was the worst no call I have ever seen
Funny how people never mention the horrible call that benefited the Saints not long before, the call that allowed them to be in the position to possibly win the game to start with. Refs should never decide games but that call was simply rectifying the previous horrible call.
@Benny Pit the Saints received many favorable non calls throughout the entire game before that missed PI. The non call is indeed terrible bit if it wasnât for at least 4 non calls that went in New Orleansâs favor the Rams would have probably had the game secured up to that point
@@bennypit4411 Any official who says (or even thinks) this should be immediately fired and banned from ever working in the sport again. Bad or missed calls are part of the game. You live with them. But an official should never make a make-up call. Ever. And I'm a Rams fan.
If you catch the guy who intercepts the ball... TOUCHDOWN!
How did they not include the fail mary in this video?
The fact that a majority of plays like this cannot be overturned is insane. Its to the point now that almost every call in baseball and football just needs to be reviewed immediately because the officiating can be so bad.
The Jessie James play was a catch as was the second Dez play. One of the reasons they need to bring back the touch down rule where you actually have to touch the ball to the ground.
They just werenât catches were they
The Dez play should of been at the very least 1st & goal on the 1 inch line
The James play by rule is incomplete. I dont know why outside of Steelers fans anyone disagrees. The Steelers by the way are probably the one franchise with the most "curious" calls in their favor! James comes down and the ball CLEARLY moves no question. It just so happens Brady who owns them did it again. Otherwise it probably wouldnt even be talked about. Suprized the bs tuck rule isnt on here. I think all of the possession overturns in this video are wrong. I mean the nose of the ball has to cross on a run. But if you catch the ball in the end zone you have to complete a complete "football play"?
@@brianseneca3546 I am not a Steelers fan and it was stil a catch he had both feet on the ground, was in possession of the ball and made a football move. Having the ball come loose hitting the ground once he breaks the plane does not matter at that point. Even by the rules of the time it was a catch and a bad call by the officials.
Based on the rules at the time neither were catches and were called appropriately
That Jesse James incomplete pass call still haunts my dreams
That call wrecked the season.
And the same thing happened to the eagles vs the pats in the super bowl and they called it a td
I'm a 9er fan. Rookie George Kittle had a very similar play the following week and kept control of the ball as he forced his arms over the line for the TD. At the press conference after the game, a reporter asked him about his play and the similarity to what happened to Jesse James, and Kittle said that he had that play in his mind as he caught the ball and didn't want a repeat, that he wanted to get the catch right.
So at least somebody was paying attention lol.
They could have had the #1 seed that year if not for that bullshit
It was the correct call based on the rules but it definitely felt like a wrong call
I am a die-hard Packers fan. The pass to Dez Bryant was a catch. He took two steps and was reaching for the goal line. That is first and goal Dallas.
You could have doubled the video length with Angel Hernandez alone
This just goes to show you, no matter how bad you hate the other team as your most deadly rival, the REFS are the true enemy
Because everyone else is perfect?
What was contreversial about that last catch?
Votto thought the ball hit the back wall first before it was caught in Gomez's glove. It would have been a home run instead of an out. There was no slow-mo from what I saw outside of this video so the motion blur would make it tough to overturn.
How could you miss the worst no-call of all time: the Rams' Robey-Coleman annihilating Tommylee Lewis at the 5 yard line for a first down that would have probably led to a Saints win and appearance in the Super Bowl?
A lot of these coaches need to be reminded about the rules.
ill give Jim Joyce a little credit he admitted he was wrong and seemed to genuinely feel bad
Even though he apologized and Galarraga accepted it Joyce didn't realize his error until he saw the replay?!?!
Wait what was weird about the last one? Iâm confused haha đ definitely need a part two of this thoooo
it was a home run, the outfielder legit doesnt have the ball in his glove
@@brianerlich2510 Yes he does have the ball. Are you watching this on a potato? đ€Łđ€Ł
Yeah i was confused about it too lol he clearly has the ball in his glove.
I had the same question. Scrolled down to see if anyone else asked.
Announcers saying "You can't end a game that way" when ref's overturn a call on replay after time has expired is the most inane comment. They may as well be saying "You have to stick with a bad call at the end of the game"
That Dez Bryant play in Lambeau Field was a catch I believe and Iâm a packers fan
I've seen plenty of running plays where it takes less than 10 seconds to unpile everyone, place the ball, and get the next snap off. The 10-second runoff because the refs called a TD and stopped the clock is rough to watch. Had they made the correct call, there is a chance that the offense could have run one more play for that last inch. But because the ref made an incorrect call, time is allowed to expire. Tough way to end a game.
Im new to American football, I didnt understand crap about this play. He was 1 yard short? And the ref said it couldn't try again cuz it had only 8 seconds left?
@@CanalBonomo So normally after a running play that does not result in a first down or touchdown, the clock continues running. Under ideal circumstances, the players would quickly line back up, the referees would place the ball and get set, and the offense could possibly get one last play in if all that happened in less than the 8 seconds remaining. In this case, the referees called a touchdown so the clock was stopped. After they determined that the play did not result in a touchdown, by rule there is a 10 second runoff because had they not stopped the clock for the TD, then the clock would have kept running anyway and that is the average amount of time it takes to reset after an unsuccessful running play. So by calling it a touchdown, it completely took away any chance the offense might have had to run a final play.
@@cdmcfall hmmmm i got it, but if they didnt say it was a touchdown and had 8 seconds left, they could still try it, right?
@@CanalBonomo Yep. They would've had to hurry because it takes some time to un-pile everyone and reset, but at least it would have been possible. Calling the TD guaranteed it was the last play because of the required time runoff.
If the team in question still has a time out, which the Lions did, the timeout should be used to avoid the 10-second runoff. Bad rule.
Dez was out of bounds in the first clip though�
And Dez dropped the ball on the next Dez clip. The hell?
Interference call against the Red Sox was a good call too.
@@jacobhenry8546 its not incorrect calls, just impactful calls
I don't know whether it matters but the heel of his hand hits first then moer of his hand touches out of bounds. he appears to have the ball secured before the hand hits.
The thumbnail says "Worst Calls".
As a Cowboys fan, I legit had to skip over that clip from the Dez Bryant catch against Green Bay that was called back. Years later and it's still too painful.
5.51 you have to catch and have control in fair territory. Not sure if it's still the MLB rule,but it was when I played
Can someone explain what happened on the last clip? I don't think I've ever seen it and it just ended abruptly with no real explanation
carlos gomez robbed joey votto of a homerun that won them the game
@@buddle9586 is that it lmaoo nevermind then
What was Votto complaining about at the end of the clip though?
@@RipTorn7 He was asking to see the ball, as proof that Gomez had caught it. Not sure why that one is on here, though--it wasn't a crazy call, just a great play.
The first one Dez is clearly out of bounds
Yes the first one but against Green Bay? That was bullshit
Some of these are good calls
As a seahawks fan, I admit the fail Mary was intercepted, but Iâm happy the call was made in our favor lol
The no basket after the deflection just isnât fair. It not being ruled touched on the floor changes when the ball could be released.
The clock should have started on the deflection rather than on the catch. If the clock had started at that point the shot wouldn't have been released in time.
@@davidkinsey8657 correct. I donât recall the exact time on the clock. Iâm talking as a general rule. I donât think it should be challengeable.
I'm not sure on that one either. The deflection occurs just after the time on this video turns to 12:05 and he releases the shot just after it turns to 12:07. Plus, the game clock starts before Ross catches it - it didn't seem to me that it started especially late. I don't actually agree with having enough evidence to overturn that shot. Let the teams decide the game in OT.
@@deja.vunathan my whole problem is he got the shot off in time with the game clock. If it started on the tip aka when it was supposed to he had the opportunity to shoot faster and make the basket.
@@jonnybaze7449 That's a good point too. I didn't actually think of that but you're right.
3:00 best MLB call I've ever seen, foolish baseball made a video on it and the catcher whiffed the tag
You see the pants ripple from contact. It was a terrible call lmao
@@curtism9702 No, they ripple from him putting his foot to the ground. Tag was totally whiffed. Good call.
That Baron Davis call was atrocious
Titans Ravens 2008 AFC Divisional Playoff Game when Baltimore snapped the ball 3 seconds after the play clock hit 0 to convert 3rd and 14 to get into FG range on the game-winning drive.
The call at 7:00 was absolutely correct. The third baseman lifted his legs and obstructed the base runner.
He literally never touched it
â@@MetraUPNWproductions7202Never touched what? Third base? Home plate? The thirdbaseman never touched the runner? Which one?
@@kali6651 home plate, gotta touch it so it counts
3:37 That was an illegal forward lateral.
Was not
I remember that perfect game,and the dumb as call
2:40 how was that play not challenged or looked at harder. That is fucking crazy
dam refs
As improbable as it sounds, the call at 2:50 was likely correct. Even though this gets cited as an all-time missed call, Jerry Meals got it right. The catcher missed the tag. This play brought video review to the MLB, which is ironic since review may have actually confirmed it.
Yeah, after seeing the video it was a correct call. It indeed doesn't seem like the catcher applied the tag at all. But good that it did bring video review into play.
No he was tagged clearly. You can see from either angle he was touched by the glove with the ball. Jerry did NOT get it right. The catcher knows if he tagged the runner or not. So, clearly you don't know what you're talking about
@@raycebaker6875 No he wasn't. The second angle from the first base clearly shows the tags were missed. Pittsburg sure has a bad history will close calls with the Braves, 1992 NLCS. Go Braves!!!
@@raycebaker6875 and the runner knew he was out. Look at him.
The Detroit Lions get screwed on calls every year since Jim Schwartz used to use scoreboard replays to embarrass the officials on bad calls
Kinda funny how Stafford was never able to win a playoff game in Dumptroit in 12 seasons but wins a Superbowl his very 1st season with a different team.
And MCDC is a 8itch, no wonder his husband left him and his Trans reassignment surgery is obvious.
I agree with some of these "crazy calls".
Game-changing is the phrase. And right or wrong, they were all game-changing.
great vid tho
2:55 that umpire was interviewed a few times after this call. He said that he never saw the catcher's glove actually touch the runner on the swipe, though it was close. He apologized for making what he deemed was "obviously the wrong call" a little bit after the game, but has since said after looking at better camera angles in higher definition, reversed course and has said he was right initially and is convinced that there's no actually contact between glove and runner.
Obvious solution is for catchers to avoid the swipe tag on a play like that; if I'm behind home plate I'm giving the guy a bear hug after tagging him in the chest
I remember cursing at my TV when the officials waved off the game winning basket by the Hornets' Baron Davis. However, the game was tied at the time, and the Hornets did wind up winning in overtime.
Dez caught that!! 10 years later and it still hurts me.
The refs should be able to sayâŠ.â O đ© I made a mistakeâ and change the call after review alwaysâŠ. It feels like their pride wonât let them sometimes
I remember that Seattle packers game. 1st half seahawks sacked Rodgers 7 times 2nd half not at all. That's because o line held as if thier lives depended upon it. Amazing slew of no calls. Lol.
When it comes to the Packers they always win due to blown calls every year *cough* dez catch *cough*
I guess you're not smart enough to consider they made adjustments at halftime. What a crybaby.
LOL a Seahags fan going to whine about the refs despite lityerally being handed a win by them. You have no room to whine after that.l. Pathetic.
@@camerontuma3526 That was not a catch. By the NFL rule at that time, he had to maintain possession all the way through the ground. The ball clearly popped up when he hit the gorund. No catch. Cry more, Cowgirls fan.
Bro let's be real sports r scripted for the most part... It's so obvious they're there strictly for entertainment purposes hell it even says it on the back of sports tickets lol... Sports r scripted and rigged big time.
2:46. Phantom tag. It was actually a great call. A heroic call.
You literally see the ripple in the pants from the contact...
@@curtism9702 you can't see shit with this video quality
He very clearly missed that
That Detroit tigers No Hitter one will always peeve me off Bad!!!! And Iâm a Pittsburgh pirates fan!! I dealt with jerry meals bullc***.
2:47 bottom of the 19th inning, that ump was just ready to go home lol I refuse to believe this ump didnt do this on purpose knowing he was full of it.
Yeah that throw beat him by a mile in the Pittsburgh vs Atlanta game. But when the catcher went to tag him out, he clearly missed him!! He never tagged him out, that's exactly why he got up after sliding and touched home plate!!
You must be as blind as the home plate ump
spoekn like a Braves fan..he clearly hit him in thigh GTFOH
Plus he didn't even touch home plate until AFTER the ump called him safe.
The Antonio Brown and Dez Bryant ones are both the right calls though, they're out of bounds.
It completely baffles me that Gallaragas game is still NOT considered a perfect game. Ump shouldve retired immediately
Bro every call should be challengeable and reviewable.
At least, despite what Cowboy fans think, 0:16 was the correct call...2:39, from that angle it looks in, but from the original angle which is the better of the two it looks out...
True, though from the angle under the posts itâs impossible to tell, as we canât establish what point the ball is level with the post. They pause it momentarily, at 2:40 but that looks a fair bit short of the posts and itâs continuing to drift wider and wider.
@@Heathen.Deity. Pause it at 2:13 and use comma/period keys to frame step. You'll see it is outside the goal the entire time.
@@The22ndDoctor indeed. This is what Iâm saying. If they had the camera located level with the post, itâd be clear. As theyâre at an angle, theyâre making a rather poor guess as to when itâs crossed the line and still canât tell how wide the ball is. đđŒ
Dez still caught it.
Thumbnail nailed it.
I agree with a number of these calls.
I'm not even a Tigers fan and that Gallaraga blown call for a perfect game still bothers me
I absolutely love that call just because it was against Detroit lol worthless disgusting fucking garbage city full of subhuman trash. They don't deserve to even have a baseball team.
1:14 GREAT call. In fact every call Cowboy fans hate is 100% the right call.
The one against the Packers was also a good call.
At 12:00 I don't understand what's going on? What difference does it make whether the defender deflected the ball, what am I missing?
It's funny, my comment got pushed next to a comment with the answer. When the defender touched the ball it started the clock which makes the shot too late.
2:57 the catcher didn't have his foot on home plate and he never touched him with his glove. That was a good call actually.
It doesnât matter if the foot is on the plate if you tag him heâs out
@@Jamerman10 He didn't tag him though. The glove missed him.
@@theparanormalman8707 True, though the foot on the plate still doesn't matter either way since it wouldn't have been a forced out.
Goated Fail Mary
Fail Mary was only about Tate's egregious OPI. He clearly, by rule, caught that ball. He established possession (simultaneous, but that counts) in the air, and was the first with two feet down. Missed OPI handed that game to Seattle, not an interception/possession call.
Should have that Cowboys/Lions Playoff game on here where the officials screwed the Lions by reversing a clear pass interference penalty, and costing them the game.
Thank you. I thought I was the only one who remembers that call!
Also, how about the receiver running around without a helmet which is normally flagged and ejected?
Oh wah. Cowboys get fucked over every game just about. God forbid a call go their way for once.
You could never pay me enough to be a ref/umpire. Spend your life either breaking even when you were right (because you did your job) or screwing up everyone's year when you make a mistake.
Jesus Christ, that Calvin Johnson TD catch. He was robbed. What did they want him to do? Hold the ball all day?
2:45 - McCutcheon whiffed on the tag.
I knew there was a reason (as far as the ref could see) but the video stops as the announcer is explaining it.
3:16. The ump was right. You need to re edit the video, catcher never touched the runner.
2:59 That dam ump just wanted to go home after 19 innings.