Evidence For Unexplained New Physics Or Issues With Dark Matter Model
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
- Get a Wonderful Person Tee: teespring.com/stores/whatdamath
More cool designs are on Amazon: amzn.to/3QFIrFX
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: paypal.me/whatdamath
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about a few issues with the modern dark matter theories especially because of new discoveries from the JWST
Links:
Previous video: • Strange Dark Matter Di...
Quantum dark matter? • Could Dark Matter Be Q...
Axion detection? • Possible Detection of ...
iopscience.iop.org/article/10...
arxiv.org/abs/2308.00744
arxiv.org/abs/2304.00704
arxiv.org/abs/2304.00703
arxiv.org/abs/2304.00705
arxiv.org/abs/2304.00701
arxiv.org/abs/2304.00702
www.aei.mpg.de/1031052/licht-...
#darkmatter #jwst #astronomy
0:00 Intro to new dark matter discoveries
1:25 New cosmological problem - S8 tension - clumpiness is weird
4:30 Potential explanation - axions?!
6:40 Could the sun be hiding some of the axions?
7:10 Laser experiment may find them soon
9:20 But this concept is hard to explain - El Gordo cluster
Support this channel on Patreon to help me make this a full time job:
/ whatdamath
Bitcoin/Ethereum to spare? Donate them here to help this channel grow!
bc1qnkl3nk0zt7w0xzrgur9pnkcduj7a3xxllcn7d4
or ETH: 0x60f088B10b03115405d313f964BeA93eF0Bd3DbF
Space Engine is available for free here: spaceengine.org
Enjoy and please subscribe.
Twitter: / whatdamath
Facebook: / whatdamath
Twitch: / whatdamath
The hardware used to record these videos:
New Camera: amzn.to/34DUUlv
CPU: amzn.to/2LZFQCJ
Video Card: amzn.to/2M1W26C
Motherboard: amzn.to/2JYGiQQ
RAM: amzn.to/2Mwy2t4
PSU: amzn.to/2LZcrIH
Case: amzn.to/2MwJZz4
Microphone: amzn.to/2t5jTv0
Mixer: amzn.to/2JOL0oF
Recording and Editing: amzn.to/2LX6uvU
Some of the above are affiliate links, meaning I would get a (very small) percentage of the price paid.
Thank you to all Patreon supporters of this channel
Special thanks also goes to all the wonderful supporters of the channel through CZcams Memberships
Images/Videos:
University of Tokyo/NAOJ
boss.astro.utah.edu/index.php?...
Mark Garlick www.markgarlick.com
ESO/SOAR/NASA - www.eso.org/public/images/eso1...
Licenses used:
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/... - Věda a technologie
Things definitely feel like they are heading towards a major shakeup in the way we understand the universe. I hope the break-through comes in my lifetime, as I’m fascinated to hear what it will be. And I’ll doubtless hear it from Anton!
I'm wondering if the Universe might be a bit too complex for an insane Chimpanzee to understand.
Yeah, we keep finding little things here and there that though not surprising, we dont know if they are meaningful in some way. It's be nice if one of those led to some new branch or a sort of missing piece.
@@kaoskronostyche9939"The remarkable thing isnt that the world is stranger than we suppose, it's stranger than we /can/ suppose!"
@@coliimusic Indeed. Usually attributed to J.B.S. Haldane I do believe from "Possible Worlds" in Possible Worlds and Other Essays (1927), p. 286.
Right you are. I would have used this quote myself but it did not come up for me.
Yes, stranger than this species of Chimpanzee could ever comprehend IMHO.
Cheers and thanks for reminding me of this quote.
I remember thinking that 40 years ago.
"Underdeveloped gas" is actually a great insult.
I am grateful to have such a wonderful, hardworking, wide-eyed, optimistic, straight-talking person as my main science communicator. I can't wait to hear about Juno and any new discoveries about Io. Thank You, Wonderful Anton.
This is your religion.
Beats Organized Hypocrisy and the Order of Diaper Snipers any day, pal
@@michaellee6489 Christianity is true, and you will stand before God and give an account for even your idle words.
Remember the year 1983. In the last 150 years secular and atheist governments have ended the lives through starvation, warfare, or murder, of 360 million people. What about 1983? Since 1983 alone there have been 1.5 billion government approved abortions. That means that in the last 150 years 1.86 billion innocent humans have been killed by the state of secular and atheist governments. Sexually transmitted diseases have killed millions. Alcoholism and drug addiction have killed millions. This progressive secular humanitarian world that you love so much is the most tyrannical and murderous system of human leadership the world has ever known.
And you think Christians are the problem. I’m thankful to God that you and those like you only have a few more years to think stupidly the way you do.
Anton, the way you explain these complex ideas so simply is a true skill and is much appreciated. Thank you, wonderful person.
I don't pretend to know the slightest thing about physics, cosmology or the math they both need. But the idea of dark matter has always seemed very odd to me. I'm glad people are working to solve this puzzle.
The world's best are on the job
Its more than odd. The dark forces is religion & a bad 1.
Jesus did not like religion either. Feynman told Einstein how the elektro magnetic field builds up a force thru light.
Dark matter is a weak, simplistic substitute for real understanding.
@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx What in the colossal smeg are you on about?
@@Unethical.DodgsonMy thoughts exactly. Who is this looper?
Your videos are always fascinating, Anton!
Just about to go bed and Anton comes in with latest cutting edge science news
Everything in science is always introducing new things :) and it means more opportunities and Anton can make more videos :)
Thank you for always sharing your knowledge, wonderful Anton. I hope you and your family are doing well.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😊👍
"Dark matter is an observation, not a theory." A certain awesome physicist named Collier uses that phrase and she makes perfect sense.
Pavel Kroupa also makes perfect sense. Go have a look at what he has to say.
It's true, no scientist disputes it-- it's a placeholder name. There are theories about what the observations are seeing, though.
@@thekaxmax Yep.
It’s a collection of observations and a blanket term for all the theories that seek to explain those observations.
The observations are valid. The explanations...a valiant effort?
Thanks. My daily midnight dose of Anton before falling asleep 😊
Fascinating questions that might only be answered by new physics, and for that, we need more data, and research, the laser project sounds incredibly interesting. Thank you, Anton.
@antonpetrov..scammer
The best video of this channel so far.
And I've watched almost all videos.
Thank you Anton. Everyday I look forward too your videos.
If the universe started hot, wouldn't it naturally start less clumpy? I mean, steam is less clumpy than water.
The focus in this topic seems to be gravity rather than temperature. It just seems to me that the preasure of early temperatures would cause the matter in the universe to disperse rather than collapse into clumps
Interesting to know about this,thanks😊
Fascinating, as far as i understand. But where do you get those beautiful screensavers?
Thanks for mentioning all that. Cool stuff
I can't wait for the next version of JWT
Hopefully it raises endless unaswerable questions
Hello Anton! You are a wonderful person too!
Finally catch up with a month of video :PPP its so interesting omg
Matter and dark matter remind me of how oceans kind of mix, like they will blend, with visible barriers but also wants to isolate to similar viscosity or salt. But like a magnetic ocean.
Great video Anton be well !
Every time something does not fit to expected landscape things get interesting, meaning that we will have new discoveries ahead. At this time cosmology has more opened questions in the last decades that any other branch of Physics what makes it one of the more exciting fields of study.
I wish, whenever people brought up axions, they would mention Frank Wilczek, the Nobel Prize winning physicist who first proposed the idea.
TY Anton for explaining why the universe is precocious. Or is that axiomatic?
Thanks Anton, your high standard has been maintained
Dark Matter?? This gonna be a good one thank you anton!!
I'm thinking... as a new layer of reality (new scale) emerges that hasn't yet had time to communicate locally to its peers, the likelihood of uneven distribution is increased compared to a layer of reality that has had time to communicate to its peers, to smoothe out distribution. In other words, this data indicates we find ourselves currently, on a scale of reality that is better at communicating to its peers, relative to the average distance between peers (galaxy to galaxy), than the very early universe was, relative to its own peers (nucleus to nucleus, or gas cluster to gas cluster). I.e. either the early universe was slow to communicate. Or... there is currently a fast communicater between galaxies we are unaware of. Why it needs to be an axion is beyond me. It could be any particle, that fits other data.
I’m not a physicist, but I think one possible reason for the too-early-to-have-been-predicted “clumpiness” might be that the initial “bang” occurred with more than one “pulse”. Overlapping pulses -even nano-seconds apart- would theoretically cause an overlapping of “stuff” from the beginning, that is, “clumping”, the way waves overlap other waves on the shore of an ocean. Wouldn’t it?
Its been a long time coming but I'm glad the information is being researched and better yet not being covered up when the results don't match general expectations.
Why cover it up when a successful demonstration and solid confirmed theory would get you a Nobel?
@@thekaxmax I consider the "space-time" we occupy to be Ether, my popularity died 100 years ago with the incorrect assumption it was atmosphere. That "it" while being eaten by gravity wells, provides its own gravity is persona non-Grata to present scientists. I like the Axion name but we already had a viable name, and I like Ether better....
@@steelgreyed 'I consider' holds no water since the ether was disproved and continues to be so with everything we put in orbit and send to other planets.
The rest of your statement is word salad.
Please read wikipedia on 'space-time' and cone up with a proper refutation with observations and explanatory maths.
@@thekaxmax I wait till the rest makes sense.
@@steelgreyed No, you have to make sense first. Ether has been disproven, time and time again. If you think it's true, prove it.
High-velocities in the "Bullet-Cluster", et Al., make better sense of simply rather more extant accretion.. and the case for early 3-body 'incidents', & exactly many fewer "axions", etc.. (IMHO)
Hello wonderful Anton.
Dear Anton, the proposal for axion as dark matter makes no sense in Particle Physics just because the supposed axion particle is a boson and all bosons, except the photon, are very unstable. And the more massive a boson is, the more unstable it is. The less unstalbe ones are the pions. And remember that dark matter particles have to be very stable in order to have lasting gravitational effects.
Well the proton is plenty stable enough so why not axions?
There is no dark matter. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal " Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occuring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, there would be no/low dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities.
It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter
My dear, the proton is a fermion (spin 1/2).
@@shawns0762 Einstein also famously hated quantum entanglement -- but that's something the 21st century has very strongly confirmed to exist. Einstein OTOH is dead and no longer able to refine his hypotheses. Why copy paste spam your word salad into every single comment?
thanks for this!
I am not a physiscist, but I have always suspected that "dark matter" and "dark energy" maybe be at least partly the result of a wrong perspective, like the discarded Ptolemean model of the solar system.
Dark matter is itself an issue. You can't build a model on the premise that you can add any amount of a magical substance wherever you need it to make a set of equations predict what you're currently seeing, and then keep adding more when observations get updated. Now, almost everything is dark matter or energy, and the real matter, which we are, and by which we make observations is but a tiny fraction.
There is no dark matter. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal " Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occuring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, there would be no/low dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities.
It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter
We got Anton on the MOND train! Toot toot!
Interesting, if we look back towards the area where the big bang occurred you would think that galactic speeds would be faster until they make collision with others imparting inertia upon the other perhaps increasing their original velocity or diminish them..perhaps el Gordo is something like that? A original speed cluster perhaps?... Shame i didn't have any classes on cosmetology or astrophysics to understand that stuff. Thanks for making this stuff easy to understand Anton!😊
Uh, the Big Bang occurred everywhere, including where you’re sitting right now. It didn’t occur in some “area”.
Would be easier to calculate when we put aside our bias in math. As it is now it works for most scales we need, but in a large enough scale it would be miss leading.
Anton, the problem here is that lack of a theory of QM cannot explain the universe as a QC function, with a few rules (Einstein's incompleteness). Once we can arrive at a algorithm of QC function, only then we can explain dark matter and energy, if not ultimate reality and metaphysics.
Thanks Anton. Great vid as ever. I like questions. heh
Brings the thought back of the Axion being the particle of light (photon) where its energy is dropped to the point where it can no longer traverse spacetime at lightspeed - may also explain the energy discrepancy between normal and antimatter. Would love to do a setup to see if we could observe a photon to axion transformation (state of matter phase shift) would be cool
Cool vid thanks as always Anton ;)
I've never heard of this, but that sounds like an interesting idea. If axions are real and are what dark matter is made of, then light eventually slowing down and no longer being energetic enough to travel at lightspeed would mean also that our cosmic horizon would not be a correct point to draw the age of the universe from. If photons eventually slow down, then there must be light much much much farther out that never managed to reach us. The age of the universe would be unknown at that point, and potentially unknowable, at least through this avenue.
Sounds like a fun idea that would completely gut modern astronomy. I'm guessing the idea of such a thing as axions isn't taken seriously? It would definitely shake things up if this were the case.
Couldn't this idea also make it so that redshift would be an effect of light losing momentum rather than space expanding? Wow, axions would seriously screw up everything we think we know if they were even considered.
Probably something I don't know invalidates them, but I wonder.
(edit)
Wait, maybe a proper age could then be come to by using the total mass of the axions accumulated inside galaxies to figure out something like at what rate they would accumulate given the estimated density of the universe itself to determine how many photons are emitted per unit of time, and how long it would have taken for them to travel until they became axions, plus the amount currently built up.
Seriously, such an idea being real would mess up absolutely everything. I can see people not wanting to take that idea seriously on just that alone. Not that I know any of the math invovled, which may totally discount it.
But yeah, fun.
That contradicts what Axions are thought to be, and the possible instances of one being detected (such as the insanely high energy photon being detected that should have been stretched out by the time it got here).
It would be the other way around, with photons being able to transition into an Axion, but only at extremely high energies, and then collapsing back into a photon when coming in contact with matter.
Interesting possibility to explore though
that violates relativity. a really low energy photon would just be really wide.
Oh, dark matter, the cosmic clown that's had astronomers chuckling for a century, and there's still no sign of a punchline that makes sense. It's like they've been on an intergalactic wild goose chase for a hundred years, and all they've got to show for it is a bunch of cosmic whoopee cushions that keep deflating when they sit on them.
Now, enter axions, the absurdity's absurdity. Astronomers, in their never-ending quest to turn the universe into a comedy show, have introduced these quirky particles into the cosmic script. It's as if they've decided to juggle flaming bowling pins while riding a unicycle on a tightrope that's on fire - you know, just to make the whole thing even more ridiculous.
Picture this: Astronomers, with telescopes pointed at the void, staring blankly at the cosmic canvas, suddenly shout, "Dark matter, axions, and...um, other stuff, I guess?" as if they're naming random things from their grocery list and hoping it will magically make sense. It's like trying to play chess with a set of Scrabble tiles - chaotic and utterly incoherent.
They've essentially turned the pursuit of knowledge into a century-long cosmic slapstick routine, where the punchline is eternally delayed, and dark matter is the banana peel that keeps astronomers slipping. Axions, in this carnival of chaos, are the cotton candy that's been flung into the crowd, sticking to everyone and making everything even stickier.
So, here's to our persistent astronomers, who've transformed the cosmos into a never-ending cosmic stand-up show, with dark matter as the bumbling, pratfall-prone comedian. Keep the popcorn handy, folks; this spectacle of cosmic confusion shows no sign of a sensible ending anytime soon.
as of late several things seem to be pointing towards Axions being the correct answer to many unsolved questions in physics
Who first postulated that there should have been equal amounts of matter and antimatter? I want to study
My brain cannot comprehend the scale of this
The JWST sure enlivened the debate!
i don't have deep knowledge how anything in our macro- or microcosmos works. but why has there to be just 1 "dark matter" which afaik is just an abstract for something we already don't know all about.
I think of it as dark gravity, nothing says that there has to be a "stuff" or matter there. It could well be unexplained wrinkles in space time.
Like gravity waves with nothing to slow them down?!?!
@@josephmastroianni1560 Not waves, but gravity and curved (wrinkles) space time are the same thing. Usually it is said that matter curves space time. But maybe it can curve all by it self.
Nothing "adds up" these days. Lots of great new data coming in....and lots of additional work necessary to interpret it.
Great time to be interested in physics, astronomy, and cosmology.
That's really interesting. There's so much about reality that we just don't know.
Was wondering is discovering the rivers of gas coursing theough the Universe had any effect on "missing" matter theories.
hello wonderful anton
If expansion was inhomogeneous, accelerations like these are possible in the early universe and would drive structure earlier, as both gravitation and expansion would work to aggregate matter.
I'm just glad we aren't staying in the spot we've been in since the early 2000's. Now we are finally approaching things with a creative scientific approach. Instead of staying stubborn or letting ego get in the way at all when it comes to scientific advancements.
what's driving this is data. It took decades of engineering to build the machines that are driving this newest wave of physics. Gravitational wave detectors. New space telescopes. The colliders that finally pinned down the higgs boson. New hypotheses are great, but without data they're just spitting in the dark and inevitably missing.
My suggestiion for the faster than expected colliding galaxys... Giant magnetic field lines along which the galaxys are pulled.
Any takers?
Hell Mr Petrov, I hope you see this. That image at the beginning of the video ( wonderful video by the way) You said the image shows dark matter. This is a real question not a gotcha. I thought we could not image dark matter as it does not imteract with light how did we get an image of it? Thank you.
Has the universe have shorter time to develop than it has existed?
If time slows down near a greater mass and the universe was way more compact than now, then must time also have moved slower, maybe even to a near standstill in the earliest moments?
So if Dark Matter is more wave-like (similar to light or a Bose-Einstein condensate), as the universe expands and cools wouldn't that also cause the axionic Dark Matter to "red-shift" much like light does, making it weaker in the parts of the universe expanding the fastest, A.K.A. cosmic voids? And could THIS help explain why the expansion of the universe is accelerating?
Everything is very clear and easy to understand until Anton says " Thank you for watching " the rest is like when you are in a grade school and you are reciting something in front of the class and you wanna finish as soon as possible
😂😂😂
I like to keep an open mind on things but as yet I have never been convinced about the existence of Dark Matter, other than as a yet unknown or unidentified force.
problem is, what exerts this force in some empty space, but not other empty space? It's not just a "force", it's a thing with invisible clumps of it out there. Invisible clumps of something with mass.
Until we find a more specific explanation for it, "dark matter" is the closest we've got.
I’d rather learn about the universe than stay plugged in to the damn news. Thank you for always offering us a reprieve.
What bugs me is that the further away something is, the more it must have moved by the time it’s light arrived in our telescope.
So what we see in diagrams is horridly distorted. How is that ever going to be taken into account?
Redshift is what makes that possible. It tells us how much space has expanded along the way.
How do axions produce gravitational lenses that produce those triple images and stuff? Why are axions the reason those images would be observed??
What we know as the strong nuclear force is actually gravity A.
There are actually two types of gravity, the gravity of large celestial bodies (Gravity B) and the aforementioned Gravity A , which we currently incorrectly (some say intentionally mislabeled as to prevent progress) label as the SNF.
My question is if we take the known gravity in the Cosmos and combine it with the total Strong nuclear force throughout the cosmos....am I correct in assuming we would no longer have a gravity deficit. It would all add up and therefore be no requirement for nonsense like Dark matter?
You can't see Dark matter, but it is everywhere. When you are lonely, you can always have a personal connection with your Dark matter. Dark matter loves you.
Maybe inflation and dark energy are the same process.
And, possibly gravity is just a local suppression of inflation by matter.
It's amazing to think how much science has discovered about astronomy and cosmology since the time of Einstein.
(It's also amazing how much our assumptions about the nature of the universe have changed because of it. Makes me think we're overdue for some more fundamental theories.)
I believe something very similar but that mass IS the source of dark energy and it warps around matter because it expands faster the closer you are to an object with mass.
But most people that I've spoken to said that idea sounds crazy.
I have a question i can`t quite grasp, we know we are following the sun in a orbit at x speed, but stars and space images follow us at a x speed.. so the question then becomes is space flat at these speeds? sounds strange to me as space is up/down/left/right
When you say that the proposed velocity is 2300 kilometers per second and also say that it's unlikely.... My question is: 2300 kilometers per second relative to what? Isn't there a problem trying to guess the velocities of the past because how can we have a relative frame to measure from?
Anton how does it feel having the highest audience retention on all of youtube.
Okay, Occam says we have to oversimplify everything, so I'll give it a shot: Paraphrasing Anton: "Scientists expected the Universe to be MORE clumpy over time rather than less". I understand that statement. BUT: Looking at it simplistically: Something that started out incredibly small, dense, and hot was expanding into the "definition" of emptiness. Think of a grenade going off. I would have expected the initial conditions to lead to a less clumpy future "down the line". The grenade shrapnel doesnt end up "closer together", in general. But I am obviously being silly, right?
Great news! I look forward to seeing the results of this test…..proving or disproving Axions would be really cool. It’s such a mind blowing conception about dark matter or whatever is the reason we see the universe and especially galactic mass and something making the universe have invisible something that we can only surmise is from our observations. I wish we could solve all the “dark” forces in our universe with matter, energy and flow…all very mysterious hopefully we learn something new in our live times to explain all or even just some of it would be so amazing! There’s paradigm changing discoveries coming I’d love to see it in my lifetime. We know a lot to us but really we know nothing. We are like babies taking our first attempts at baby steps. Still amazing that we understand anything about the universe and reality is mind blowing. Look how long it took to figure out the sun was just another star in the back woods of the Milky Way galaxy in this eminence universe! Thanks Aton fret video. I watch faithfully everyday. I save it for when I go to bed I look forward to laying back relaxing leading these wild scientific test and all the other info you provide. You keep interested! Your a wonderful person!
What if dark matter is kinda like “pending matter” some sort of matter that hasn’t collapsed into reality and may be in a similar state to quantum particles?
Creative and I love the idea 💡
So it’s matter that is just still rendering?😂 let’s hope our universe gets a better graphics card then🙏🙏
@@ukeedge27610.o
Quantum particles describe all the matter we know in the standard model so this isn’t saying much
@@winycentaur2540 Hey it’s an Idea 💡 That’s smart. Hell, my brain 🧠 can’t go that far 😂
Whoever programmed our simulation is still trying to figure out how to define their hack that is Dark Matter.
I think we just need more data and images to help us understand the dark matter problem - we on the right track but need more data. It will make more sense when we know about more "amonalities" in the images and data we are getting.
Dude, this axion explanation is probably the first Dark Matter theory I can actually start to buy a little.
I've heard of "Dark Matter Coffee." I guess they get the coffee beans from the Cosmos somehow.
@whatdamath Electromagnetic thermodynamic brinicle ice finger of death evaporation condensation precipitation perpetual motion
I sometimes feel that physics is like a Lego model where a mistake was made early in the build. You carry on building, the model gets more and more complex and then something doesn't fit. There's a fundamental assumption on which other theories are built that is wrong.
I like that thinking. Personally, my money is on the cosmic distance ladder, which pretty much HAS to be wrong at one or more steps. Calculate the distance wrong to a good percentage of the Universe, and yes, the numbers will be off a bit!
+1 to that line of thinking. Personally I find it odd that literally every new thing has to have something to do with new particles, new matter, new mass, but my understanding is they can't tell the difference between energy and mass. So the name "dark matter" is a completely fallacious name that ignores the bedrock fundamentals of reality, and the vast majority of people will be led toward looking for matter/particles rather than the flow of energy.
@grawss I think the universe is a lot simpler than the physicists would have us all believe. You're right about the pursuit of new particles. The graviton is a good example. I thought it was understood that gravity is an emergent property of warped space-time.
@@austinbeigeIt seems like the people that subscribe to the warped spacetime theory are the same people looking for a gravity particle. They follow the same model, but the ideas seem conflicting. If they were to say, "we're looking for the energy signature that might key us into the interactions/origins of gravitational pull" it'd be more acceptable.
What a time to be alive. Was hoping to see some legit Axion news in my lifetime. Can't wait to see what comes from it.
Why would anyone even expect clumpiness to remain the same or increase? The further out space stretches, the further apart matter is from each other, the freer matter is to roam around to wherever.
clumpiness is mostly constrained by the primordial universe. the pattern is becoming too large to have changed much in the time the universe has existed
If axions are real and we can harness them, they could be revolutionary for wireless energy transfer if axions interact weakly with matter and can be turned into photons inside devices.
10:00 What if there's a lower size limit and light, I mean an electromagnetic wave started a long long time ago and got to that far away point 8 billion years ago on its way to our observation?
Feels like we are overdue for a Newton/Einstein/Heisenberg to give us a major breakthrough in the understanding of our universe
Well I sorta agree with that, but: Einstein wasn't one in a billion. He was the ONLY one, in about 100 billion!
Its probably distortions in spacetime that alters the physics in each region.
So Ive been watching a lot of space themed channels for a few months now like anton, john michael goodier, sea, history of the universe and cool worlds and what I don’t understand is how everyone is casually mentioning dark matter (also stuff like dyson spheres when talking about aliens) as if these were confirmed and actually exist. Did I miss some big recent discorvery?
No, you didn't. It's just the commonly-accepted placeholder explanation. As good an explanation as can be....for now.
Dark matter is a label for that which we cannot see, it's confirmed to exist as a *thing*, we just have no idea what that thing is, where it is, how it functions or interacts with other things, or how to search for it. We can confirm its existence because there are issues in our models without it. Whatever dark matter ultimately turns out to be, whether a severe miscalculation early in the cosmic measurement ladder, an exotic particle, or a combination of things, it won't always be called dark matter & the term will disappear. It's entirely possible there is no dark matter & instead of being unable to locate mass that should exist for our calculations to function, our calculations could just be wrong & dark matter is a "ghost" only present due to human error. But there are certainly holes in our current models that, if our models are accurate or approaching accuracy, demand the existence of mass we cannot detect. Because we cannot see it we call it dark.
@@zombinedotrar Your answer is WAY better than mine 👍
Observations suggest that there is more mass out there than the stars and galaxies themselves. This is empirical data with no solution. The problem is labeled as "dark matter".
They are searching something and so the come up with new religion. I can tell you: Jesus did not like religion. Neither do i.
I wonder what we’ll solve first, quantum gravity or dark matter. Both could pave the way to the other.
@@antonpetrov.. silence, fake anton
The laws of the universe invariably find some point as we discover or refine our explanations of them: "except for the exceptions".
Yes, people, the dark matter model has some issues, and needs refining. That's called "science." But this doesn't magically solve the far-more-prevalent problems with the MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics/Gravity) model. There are multiple good observations (still unaffected) which MOND cannot explain at all, and only some version of a dark matter model can. Unless some wildly different hypothesis comes up (neither MOND nor dark matter), that is.
There is no dark matter. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal " Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occuring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, there would be no/low dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities.
It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter
Anton Petrov. Inverted Hexagon with radiation decay like alveoli of lungs?
When water flows moving different directions, meet, the volume ratios passing in each flow, determines whether a whirlpool will form. A single flow, hitting an obstruction, will be split into flows moving different directions, so an object can cause the formation as well. Same with air masses forming tornadoes. ... So it makes a lot of sense that flows of elements, such as hydrogen and helium, would create the same dynamics. So, too, would rock flows make sense.
So, the flows of star materials, are the most prevalent, and each is a unique composition, and so unique mass:volume ratios. But that doesn't matter, but for the values it creates, would just need to be scaled, adjusting to the values of the formation requirement threshold, yadda, yadda... While carrying diverse components, the prevalent flows in our universe are rich in H and He. Sometimes thresholds are et, and whirlpools form. Just like water whirlpools, some form and then quickly break apart and the flows continue past each other, and others stay in form for a very long time, get faster spin speed, and more dense, and faster, and pull in more volume from the flows still jiving, until they can condense at the inverted apex, into a singularity, creating a black hole in the center of the structure. So on a galactic scale, the whirlpool/tornado is the galaxy, but on an Earth scale, the singularity is the power at the tip of the funnel cloud as it touches down, it's limit, because the ground once you are down a few meters, in most places, is even more dense. Even the surface can be dense enough to stop the singularity in it's tracks, i.e. a rocky plain, or rocky hill, mountain obviously.
So this raises a few questions... are there any objects outside the flows that are forming a galaxy, which are dense enough that they can rip the whirlpool formation apart? Do we even calculate the latent energy of the movement/flow that elements create as they move around space, or do we just calculate the material we see? Because a car rolling down hill does not require energy, correct, it in fact produces extraneous energy which could be used somewhere else. Even unharnessed, the breeze would move the grass and dust on the side of the road. A bus full of gold would move small pebbles with breeze, and vibrational energy in the ground. C'mon, man. I got this, lol So, do we really need dark matter to make sense of it all, or do we just need to get our heads out of our asses, so as to gain a little perspective??
Do we know all this, or am I giving away free genius again?? .... I'm not an alien, really. Well, not an extraterrestrial alien, anyway
Dark matter is a horrid name, but it feels like a solution cobbled together for things we just don’t understand. Some of it seems like it could be quantum state matter like Einstein condensates rather than a new particle.
It also predicts a cause for an effect without any evidence. It would have been much better to call it dark gravitational effect.
Scientists use the English language as well as catholics use God to explain things.
Most are just psychotic narcissists.
well it is an observation that we dont want to cobble together just any solution for, we want to find the right answer for.
Although assuming it was matter was not great.
That's literally what it is. A solution cobbled together for something we don't understand. Specificially, why the predicted mass and the observed mass don't match.
Notably, it's been decades and we still don't have an actual answer to that question.
Dark means unknown. A question mark is not a solution.
Ever since I was a kid I was afraid small hairy aliens would manipulate dark matter to travel at high speeds and come to earth to eat my cat. Thank god that doesn't seem very likely with what we know now.
could axion recomposition also relate to tunneling?
Hard to beleive, since I haven't been there. You might be onto something.
Anton, please check out Alexander Parkhamov’s work in Dark Matter detection. He has consolidated his work in a book called “Space. Earth. Human.” You will find it fascinating.
I don't understand how a wave/particle with a wavelength of light years (or a galaxy), could be trapped inside something as relatively small as our sun
An invisible type of matter that we can’t directly detect isn’t acting like we want it to? Color me shocked. 😮
ALPS II: "What if quantum tunneling... but HUGE?"