5 New Scientific Discoveries in 2024
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 04. 2024
- Explore the latest breakthroughs in science with us! From the mind-boggling discovery of the Big Ring in space to revolutionary advancements in battery technology, get ready to be amazed!
Warographics: / @warographics643
MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
Places: / @places302
Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq
0:33 Chapter One: The Big Ring
3:28 Chapter Two: Batteries of the Future
7:57 Chapter Three: A Puzzling Black Hole
10:37 Chapter Four: A Cloning Breakthrough
13:20 Chapter Five: World's Smallest Robots
Thank you
Not sure why they don't already do this but thank you
You’re the best. Please do this for other videos you watch, it truly is a gift.
Thank you for saving my time.
The funny thing is sometimes I see really positive responses to posts like this one and sometimes I'll see really nasty replies. Personally, I say thank you. Some topics just aren't very interesting to me so it's nice to know where to go!
It is when we find something that DISAGREES with current models that we make real scientific progress.
That's not how science works 😜
Don’t question the science. Just “trust” it.
...no, we just call them pseudo scientists. & conspiracy theories. Until say, lazer weapons are mentioned once or twice by a politician. Eventually being used nonchalantly in a conflict.
@@madmartigan8119 You are mistaken.
When you find evidence that disagrees with current models that *are repeatable* you can make scientific progress.
Too many shady individuals bring out claims that go against current models, but either put out falsified data, or just say "trust me, bro."
It's better to preserve bees than to invent micro-robots to replace them.
(Sigh) Bees are not in danger. The supposed problem of Sudden Colony Colapse is not a new issue, they simply gave what Bee keepers have known about for hundreds or thousands of years a scary name. It is a common thing YEARLY.
Instructions unclear, I now have a bee hive encased in epoxy resin
I had a convo with AI that implies we can use "extremophiles" to do that no robots needed with tech that exists today!
@@wstavis3135 Domesticated bees are an invasive species. The worrisome bee loss is native eusocial bees who pollinate things honey bees dont.
Agreed, but its nice to have a reliable backup should something go wrong. Also bees don't do well in environments that they aren't accustomed to, such as space or another planet, but the plants themselves might be perfectly happy in. These robots would allow us to pollinate the plants in these environments with much less fuss than trying to acclimatize or genetically modify Bees to do the same thing.
I appreciate scientitsts who say, 'looks like we were wrong about xyz', and quickly adjust so they can enjoy and perpetuate the joy of discovery versus the so called scientits who are really modern day flat earthers who do everything they can to stop facts from seeing the light of day so that they can temporarily maintain false authority. Thank you!
You say 'modern day flat earthers' like there isn't a growing movement of modern actual, unironic Flat Earthers, lol. You're welcome for ruining or making your evening depending on how you take this news.
Who are these scientists you have in mind?
pretty ironic to say "modern day flatearthers" considering they're a modern occurrence. the ancient world didn't believed the earth was flat, we're just evolving backwards
Flat Earthers don't actually believe the World is flat, they just troll people who treat science as a religion.
They target people who treat theories as facts and get upset if anyone questions popular theories...even though skepticism is the main principle of science.
So they do the same exact thing mapmakers have been doing for thousands of years and then troll the living Hell out of the people who get upset over it
@@vincentcabezas7147they thought we were the center of the universe in ancient times as well as being flat. 😂 but yeah.
Dolly was the first MAMMAL to be cloned. Someone cloned tadpoles back in the 50s.
And nature does it naturally too: parthenogenesis.
Aren't tadpoles one of those things that are sort of naturally cloned? ( honest question)
Really?
@@rebeccarakuza2845 I was wondering that myself when I read the original comment!
@@rebeccarakuza2845 Not sure what you mean by naturally cloned. They come from sexual reproduction. Each tadpole is genetically unique, though there are some interesting metholization going on from various environmental inputs. There are some differences in the egg vs amniotes which makes it easier to modify... hence the use of tadpoles.
Care to elaborate on natural cloning. I feel like I am missing something here that would make it make sense if I knew it.
Number 6 discovery: Simon churns out a new channel every few months
What's the newest? I haven't seen a brand new channel from him in over a year and a half, from what I remember, anyways. This channel, for example, was founded in 2020. Also, he's no longer a part of 3 of the channels, I believe. The actual owners of the channels forced him out and now their views are a lot lower than when he was hosting them.
@@BackYardScience2000 what channels were he forced out of?
Obviously someone has cloned Simon Whistler.
@@BackYardScience2000 Bro thank you for youre detailed and unnecessary revelations
R/whoooosh?
Newest, if memory serves, is Places. Less than a year old.
And the daughter of the founder of Geographics, one of the aforementioned previous channels Fact Boi worked with has made a public statement on that channel saying she and others handled things badly.
LOL rewatch the intro at 0.5 playback speed. Simon has been drinking all morning.
I listen to Simon at 0.75 at all times
Dang, I speed him up because I don't want to lose my life just watching videos. I'll slow him down.@@chrismills9620
I watch all this stuff at 2x. Normal sounds drunk to me.
That was pretty funny, ty.
That is actually bad for a channels watch time. As it expects for example 20 minutes but if you speed it up it only registers 10 minutes so it looks like you clicked off after 10 minutes. CZcams should really fix that so it still registers as a whole view.
Playback at .75 makes Simon sound hammered.
As an individual with a B.S in the sciences (not even close to the biggest brain and am not about to claim so), I always appreciate new information coming out to challenge current hypothesis and theories.
I have gotten very tired of scientists, who have been trained far better, coming out and stating hypotheses and theories as “fact”. They are not. These are simply the best answers we have come up with this far, and could be disproven tomorrow.
The people who make these statements are standing on the shoulders of giants and acting like they are giants themselves. Not a fan of that behavior.
Last time I showed someone the big ring they got a restraining order.
Ah...you actually went there! 😂 caught me off guard 🤣
Huwhat?
Anus ring?
ah, but this isn't about you
Weak
You go, Alexia Lopez!!!! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the Big Ring is 9.2 billions light-years away, doesn't that mean we see it now as it was 9.2 billion years ago? You know, speed of light and all that? And if that's the case, shouldn't the Upper Limit be even smaller than 1.2 billion light-years because, as I said, it was 4.x billion light-years in diameter 9.2 billion years ago? Doesn't that make it even more puzzling?
This why space theory conversation get a little far fetched. Like we have to take a leap of faith to see understand and believe this stuff…
None of this is real.
Is anything really real? Does real even exist?
I like apples
I imagine it’s a civilization except they’re all long dead
Our *sandbox* has to be *BIG* ,this way it will take *Humanity* a very long time to explore it.. 🌌
Very bad RPG. Would not recommend.
@@DJPhukk
RPGs don't have a lifetime's worth of information for you to discover packed into something too small for the human eye to see. They get very repetitive very quickly.
It is literally impossible for the human brain to comprehend the amount of stuff that makes up existence, let alone learn everything about everything in a single human life. Pick something you're interested in and have at it.
@@DJPhukk Best graphics i've ever seen, though. But too difficult for my tastes.
And slightly longer for humanity to break it.
to bury their shit!!
Simon, that intro sounded like an Aussie after a few VB's 😂
VB was my go-to when I lived in Exmouth! Good stuff.
@@danidavis7912 I totally have to disagree , most emphatically ! When I landed in Sydney in '91, I went to a King's Cross bottle store and asked for a dozen of the most popular beer, he gave me VB. When I tasted it, I though it was like soapy water. Compared to nearly all other beers, it is SERIOUSLY under hopped, bland, vague neither crisp, or malty or even biscuit like, it's more like something between a womens legs.
@@ashleyobrien4937 and...uh...what's wrong with the stuff between a woman's legs? And uh....what a creative comparison. 🤭
@@ashleyobrien4937 so it tasted like a horse? 😄
You can get it walkin' You can get it talkin'! YOU CAN GET IT WORKIN' A PLOUGH! Matter o' fact I've got it now!
Vaginal Backwash, for a hard earned thirst.
"One Ring to rule them all
One ring to find them
One ring to bring them all
And in the Darkness, bind them. "
this is one of my favorite videos of yours!! please talk about more scientific discoveries!
They let her in to their phd program and she completely wrecks their entire lives, proving everything wrong before she even finishes
We call those "hometown heroes" where I come from
That's precisely what Science wants to happen.
@@procatprocat9647 most… but the older, more established ones don’t want to be told that everything they’ve ever published, and that their entire life was a waste because of this 20-something year old. I just find it funny that it was a student.
That's not even close to an accurate summation lol
@brandonlm0125 that's human nature. Nothing specific to science. Not at all.
Governments are gonna love getting their hands on the future mini robots...
Perverts as well 😅
I'm sure there are government labs developing mini robots now. Probably more advanced since they have an unlimited funding source... taxpayers.
Who do you paid for them, probably a while back
Me, I want tiny robots for pest control. A whole platoon of mechs wandering my house, killing ants and flies.
autism speaks
And spiders. Spiders
Have you heard of water reanimated robot spider corpses? Simon did a video. Who decided this should be a thing? And why??😳😭😳😭😳
@@piperjaycie what the actual fuck 😳😐😭 I didn't until you mentioned it.. 😭
Spiders do that already if you leave them be.
I always click on his videos thinking it's Vsauce
Literally everyone is watching this in the future.
You watched it in the past now
@@vicvinegarLLC Which was still the future from his point of view.
We never even experience the present. Let that sink in
Wait what is this? What am I looking at?
Now, Sir. You're looking at now. Everything that is happening now is happening now.
Well go back to then!
We can't.
Why?
We passed it.
When?
Just now.
Time is Relative
Absolutely fascinating. Thank you, hope to see much more of this content
It was an informative and wonderful scientific explanation and coverage...thanks for sharing
the big bang isnt a center-point detonationfor everything everywhere
, it just serves as a center point relative to us.
Exactly, they forget that the Universe is INFINITE! So why not an infinite number of Big Bangs over a infinite time and space.
0:35 - Chapter 1 - The big ring
3:30 - Chapter 2 - Batteries of the future
8:00 - Chapter 3 - A puzzling blackhole
10:40 - Chapter 4 - A cloning breakthrough
13:25 - Chapter 5 - World's smallest robots
Why are you copying and pasting another persons comment? They posted this exact same comment a pretty good while before you did. Trying to steal likes? Or did you just not see it?
@@BackYardScience2000 the timestamps are not the same, and the formatting is not quite the same
@@BackYardScience2000 As @AltonV pointed out, and something that was easy enough to see, if the OP had "copy/pasted" the other comment then they also took the time to change the timestamps and even the wording.
Yaaaaaay, fun and potentially undepressing video ^_^
lol j/k
Appreciate all the effort that goes into all the content you guys do.
Merci!
~a random canadian subscriber dude
My favorite recent discovery was evidence for the fusion of elements inside water vacuum bubble collapses. It is absolutely fascinating. It totally rewrites most of what we understand to be about the formation of elements in our galaxy, human history, radiometric dating, and much more. It also opens up modern alchemy as a legitimate science based specialty, lol. All around super cool.
I think that might have been an April fools post.
thanks Simon
I stood up and applauded the water ion battery invention. Yes please!!!!
The Big Ring (and companion) sounds like another universe interacting with ours in the way that bubbles do.
Quite interesting given the recent theories that the fabric of space at a low enough level behaves like foam and water. Makes ya think!
Simon!! I'm impressed!!!!
Unlike americans, who ALWAYS manage to mispronounce place names in Australia, you were able to pronounce "Melbourne," as flawlessly as a local!!!
Well done, Simon! I take back 20% of the things I've previously said about your pronunciation...
Thanks for a great video. And if you want tor widen your audience you could dial down the background music to make it easier for old-timers like me to filter the speech from the background :D
What Simon says gives me a big kick in the bejeebers. Great science stories. Thank you!
You JO to this is what you are saying?
Define "bejeebers".
Simon says. our world is a wonderful place, with never-ending amazing features to astound, many yet to be found. Nothing about putting your hands on your head.. or anywhere else.
Bejeebers means mental soundness, wits .
@@TheRockMorton I thought it was coded language for felching.
As soon as enough lithium batteries are used up you can also extract the lithium and precious metals from them to make new ones. It is called recycling and works fabulously if you actually do it.
Exactly. Requiring battery manufacturers to produce batteries that are designed to be easily recycled, and to do the recycling themselves, would go a very long way.
No argument on using battery technology, but current technology it cost vastly more to recycle lithium batteries than to mine new lithium
@@kevinsulak4258 In large part because batteries are made to be cheap at the point of sale (glued & welded) rather than cheap at the point of recycling (made to be disassembled.)
If the lithium was easier to recover at the point of recycling then the cost of lithium itself would be cheaper to use in batteries. But manufacturers don't make them that way because their competition doesn't make them that way and nobody gains the benefits but nobody take the hit in increased initial production costs.
It's one of the areas where collective mandates are necessary. If battery manufacturers were required to recycle their own products (and provably so) then they would have to start making them recyclable from the point of sale for their own benefit later.
I feel like I watched a video or read an article about there being a few companies that are taking on the lithium battery waste with hopes of improving recycling processes and having it be a massive lucrative investment once it's a viable option
I'm a little disappointed that he made lithium sound like it is rare
Lithium is everywhere on earth. The ocean alone contains a lot in sea water, and we can extract it. I'm pretty sure there are already doing that, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Anyway, if they can make calcium air batteries happen. Then maybe we can use that to make lithium air.
If you guys don't know Lithium Air batteries are the end all be all batteries as far as energy density goes. The therotical limit if you use air from the atmosphere like engines do?
Is a whopping 12.3k kwh/kg. That is as much as kerosene! Yet kerosene doesn't have the effiency of using efficent electric motors.
That is as much as the average electric car uses!
So a single kilogram battery or 2.2 pounds could give you a car. One light as hell, and fast as a rocket.
Anyway lithium air should be funded. Last year a team in America got one to work at room tempature.
We just need to get half the effiency on it, and it will be a game changer.
OMG the intro was indecipherable for me. love it
I love the way you finish discussing a conundrum with a question 😂
They should be literate and call it the One Ring:
"One Ring to rule them all
One ring to find them
One ring to bring them all
And in the Darkness, bind them. "
Thank you
In German this sounds far more epic ngl
@@maximilianschonfeld9549 Please go on...
The first two seconds of this video on repeat is all I need
This is insane stuff Simon.
Batteries: I know Simon meant nickel-cadmium. 😉
I liked the sound of Cadium…..
I hoped somebody else would pick up on that... maybe if you mixed cadmium and radium you'd get "cadium"?
He doesn't write or research his material. He only reads it aloud from a script. That's how he makes a living - as a presenter of other people's material.
Best wishes from Vermont 🍁
I’m going to watch this again in 2025,6,7,8,9,30.
Ww3 will happen long before that 😅
@@adamlee9461so? Why would that mean he can’t watch Simon? I hope the people closest to you are disgusted with, and hate you. I genuinely wish that you’re loved by no one in perpetuity, everywhere forever.
@@adamlee9461it's already happening right now 😂
I love your channel, beautiful being! ❤️❤️❤️ namaste 🙏🏻
Good vid broski
YEAH SCIENCE!
*_"It's ScIEnCe!!!"_*
Closer to halfway through2024? Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall, 10 billion light-years in length (observable universe is about 93 billion light-years in diameter).
I’m a bit surprised to see WSU make it on this list though I was hearing about some of the mechanical engineering stuff through the professor I worked for in the engineering department. I just didn’t realize how big this was until now.
Thank you
The analogy you used comparing the black hole to a little boy that looks like a grown man reminds me of the Robin Williams movie 'Jack'.
It's like a 'Jack' hole.
Sounds kinky
Dang
Using memory alloys as mechanical parts is also how you create a "hook shot". Using electricity to quickly heat up a specialized stand of memory alloy-which would cause it to expand outward, and then allowing it to cool back into its designated shape is how you cause it to contact. Innovation/ideas like this is a key component in creating small hook-shots.
The Australian batter research is awesome.
Crikey!
RMIT I go to that uni
Can't wait to see what all JW finds out about the universe, and other sensor equipment we put out there.
Not too long ago, we were convinced the sun and planets all rotated around the Earth. What will we find out next that we completely screwed up? Going to be a fun journey.
And watching all the big brains go "But it can't work like that!!" and complain is going to be half the fun.
Its not like the "good ole days" where they defend their wrongness up til they die.
Nowadays scientists actually like being proved wrong, because its exciting and we get to learn more/new things that eventually gets us closer to the truth.
There is no such thing as perfection, but getting closer and closer to it is what drives real scientists forward, and leads to more understanding.
The universe is its transition from nihilism and lack of distinction to its conception in endless forms and forms that match its attributes. For it, existence is that it has revealed itself and its diversity. If I said that it is nihilism, you are right, and if I said that the forms are true, then it is all in all, and He would like to show its transition with every memory, every planet, and every thing. A galaxy. The black hole is its ancient world, which is singularity and nihilism. Then there is creation and various images, and this applies from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy. Existence is nothing but images revolving around nothingness If you go to the farthest reaches of the galaxy, nothing will change. You are a drop in a sea that has no shore. You are the drop, you are the sea, and you are everything.
I have not seen a video of yours in years meaning that subsequently I have not heard your voice in years. Your voice has changed. LOL I like it
Exciting news!!
Watching the latest Simon video in his home country!! Passing time a Heathrow.
His home country is Somali. Where he belongs.
I always like the 'we came from a big bang' yeah cool, but were did the big bang come from 😂
According to the theory , it came from a singularity , but nobody actually knows for sure
It's like asking what lies outside Everything.
A better question would be why was there a big bang, or simply, why is there anything other than nothing? it seems pretty elaborate to be pointless.
I always like the "God made the universe" yeah cool, but where did God come from... 😄
The universe is cyclical. Time is an illusion. None of this is cuasally related to our lives though so, smoke a bowl and relax man. It's all good.
Tssss
Tsssss
Tssss
Tssss
Tough to listen to this on headphones. Is it me or does this channel
Have the occasional audio issue?
Love the content, curious about the audio problems.
Even listening without headphones. Once you notice it, it is horrible
Have they made any progress with telomere shortening problem?
Talking about the size of what is supposedly a singularity is always weird to me
I think Simon's beard is getting darker.
Behold! For he is an immortal!
For every video he makes he loses a day of age. No, wait, he be like 12 by now. Dudes busy.
how do you just stumble on something for the first time, that takes up over 5% over the entire observable universe
Interesting that two of the five topics dealt with how current observations make clear that astronomical sciences and narratives need revamping.
Simon looked lovely in that outfit last week
I suspect he is I front of a camera all day long doing videos after videos...every day..sunup to sunset
Do you think he has herpes?
My understanding is that lithium is actually incredibly abundant and that there is so much we could never run out.
Extracting it is another matter.
Sadly, Afghanistan has a ton of lithium and other metals that science is interested in, so we can expect continued combat (at some level) so various countries can aquire it. Ugh.
I believe there are two main problems with lithium:
The first is that extracting it is cumbersome, and as stated in the video, causes some pretty massive negative repercussions for the environment. While we likely have more on Earth total, than we can use *currently*, most of it is inaccessible. This puts a huge limit on how much we can actually utilize in manufacturing.
Second, lithium is one of the least abundant elements overall, and more lithium can't be produced. There is currently no known process to manufacture lithium, so the amount we have is the *total* amount we will ever have. So while we might have more than enough for our needs at present, if we ever try to massively scale up our usage of the element, we could easily hit a permanent limit.
@@AeriFyrein Lithium is the 25th most abundant element on Earth, there is more than we could ever use.
But like I've said, it can be quite labor-intensive to extract. That is because it's usually in fairly low concentration.
But they are developing new techniques for extraction that are much better.
There are probably better battery chemistries coming up, but we are not gonna run out of lithium no matter how much we need.
Lithium is kind of like aluminum: it's incredibly plentiful, but it requires a lot of energy to refine.
That's why aluminum and lithium are both great candidates for recycling, and lithium that is extracted from dead batteries can be used again, nothing about it is depleted from use, it's a good as new.
I believe lithium will eventually go out favor for most uses except perhaps air travel and high performance applications. In those cases, high cost and the requirement for other expensive metals in the batteries like nickel, and cycle life downsides will remain worth it. But for just about everything else, cheaper tech like sodium ion will likely take over.
@@patreekotime4578 I totally agree, sourcing these minerals is a pain.
I heard someone has developed WATER-based batteries! How great would THAT be?
If you think about the properties of wave propagation especially as it relates to matter of significant density variance, the 'big ring' could be a hint as to 'where' the big bang took place. We are situated somewhere within the universe, the expanding nature of which necessitates that this even happened some'where'.
If you think of it as a bang you are correct. However the Big bang is kind of a misnomer. A more accurate description would be exponential cosmic inflation from and to everywhere simultaneously. Which doesn't quite have the same ring to it.
How? This begining Bang happened everwhere simultaniously. You cannot even define a big void, from where everything must have been blown into ALL other directions.
Simon, where do you get your information from? I would also like to keep up with the scientific community but not sure how
"but what exactly?"
When your model continuously fails to predict new discoveries like this, and even worse declares such discoveries as impossible, it's time to consider the possibility that your cosmological model is just flat out wrong.
Maybe start with the possibility that the big bang as proposed never happened.
Compare the list of things that it predicted right against what it got wrong and you'll see why they aren't throwing anything away.
Big bang theroy has been proven wrong
just because 2=1+1
and 2=1+1-1+1
have different equations doesnt mean the answer was wrong. We are still looking for answers. thats why we human think and progresses.
It’s flat out wrong because the earth is flat
@@kevind2163 *No.*
The REALITY is… We don’t know 💩
Nigel casually discovers epistemology
Science has discovered plenty. YOU don't know 💩
More like we know very little, but we ARE very little so it seems like we know quite a bit lol
@@CheesesteakfreakI believe what he means is: the more we discover, the more questions are produced as a result rather than the actual answers
@@pizzafriespasta3910 plenty of answers have been revealed. come on guys you are smarter than this.
UHHH, Simon, you got that wrong. The positive terminal of a battery is the ANODE and the negative is the CATHODE.
We need to hear this kind of things in daily news.
Wow human clones sounds like a source that'll guarantee your body won't reject any transplantation
Lol
I've seen the movie. It doesn't end well.
Or give Simon the ability to create countless CZcams channels
Watch the dystopian movie the island
Astronomers have used the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes to confirm one of the most troubling conundrums in all of physics - that the universe appears to be expanding at bafflingly different speeds depending on where we look.
This problem, known as the Hubble Tension, has the potential to alter or even upend cosmology altogether. In 2019, measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope confirmed the puzzle was real; in 2023, even more precise measurements from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) cemented the discrepancy.
Now, a triple-check by both telescopes working together appears to have put the possibility of any measurement error to bed for good. The study, published February 6 in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, suggests that there may be something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe.
Doesn't that just mean we're not at the centre of it? 😂
And a new study, unpublished yet, but discussed at an event, looks at the same data and shows that there may not actually be a Hubble Tension at all and it could all just be an acculutated mistake in how the data is being processed.
I had heard that many space related theories are essentially just speculation (very little evidentiary data) and we should not be surprised if a number of them prove to be wildly inaccurate.
Yeah, we're going to live to see "Parts: The Clonus Horror" become our everyday reality.
I had to re listen to that into 😭🤣
Wait until you discover biological based batteries!
The Matrix is my favorite movie.
That was a real based-up thing to say brugh.
That's a valid point. Some birds can fly across the Pacific without eating anything. Can you (realistically) imagine a battery-powered bird doing that?
@@lcbryant78 That was one of the dumbest movies. The machines would have harvested more energy from whales or elephants and wouldnt need to create a false reality to do so.
@@thebenc1537 in its defence, the battery was the studios idea, originally the humans were used as biological processors which makes alot more sense but studio exces though the GP wouldn't understand this so insisted on batteries.
Two big discoveries: scientist finds literally the largest thing in the sky. And we apparently never tried just using water for batteries.
The water thing is dumbed down.. a lot.
Saline solutions have ALWAYS been good electrical conductors.. you just run into the problem that is also really good at rusting damn near everything that conducts the electrical charge. The breakthrough was more along the lines of finding a way to make the rusting either not happen, or in a way that doesn't interrupt the flow of electricity.
Calcium does the same thing, it coats surfaces then prevents the flow of electricity.
The discovery was more about the materials/techniques that allow water to be used effectively.
@@SeraphRyanindeed. In fact the power source of the Nautilus in the book 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is said to be aluminum that produces electricity via the salt in the sea water. So it’s not like the idea hasn’t been out there a while.
@@RandomGreymanestill one of my best reads, even 40 yrs after reading it.
Ah, nickel cadium, the best cadium
I'd be curious to see the psychological differences between the identical clones.
Allow us to put to rest a few of a burning questions that psychology could never be able to answer without an exact clone
Have you seen all the cases of twin separated at birth. Two steps is a good documentary. And there is another about twins, one raised in California and the other in Norway. And then the case of the triplet boys who were give to different families based on their class. That one did not have a good ending.😔😔😔😔
Him: "Artificial pollinating"
Me: *Starts having a crisis after remembering that one Black Mirror episode*
hello everyone!
Hi!
Hi
Hellow :D
Howdy partner
Hello :)
Halo Ring?
At time stamp 4:36 you mentioned "cadium" in reference to nickel cadium batteries. I was unfamiliar with cadium so I looked it up and even allowing for obscure English pronunciation I think you were referring to "cadmium" for nickel cadmium batteries. It may be a snivel, but you are so usually accurate that I have come to depend on your knowledge base and I don't wish to see a spot on your otherwise outstanding record. I enjoy your programs and watch most of them. Thank you for the effort you invest.
That intro. Wow. I had no idea what you said for 5 seconds. 😂
Why does it seem like nature has failsafes for cloning
It isn't failsafes. It more has to do with how the earliest organisms reproduced that way, but as we got more complicated, we started doing it in other ways, which are not really compatible with cloning. Basically just billions of years of evolution moving us away from that, making it very hard to get it to work now.
nice
A Big Hello From Greece 🌞👋👍
Washington State University is my school. Their robots department keeps getting better and better. It's funny because I am an engineer and I witnessed how little resourced they get compared to some schools.
*I love the grounded reality of this channel!!!*
Retirement took a toll on my finances, but with my involvement in the digital market, $27,000 weekly returns has been life changing. AWESOME GOD❤️
Only God knows how much grateful i am. After so much struggles I now own a new house and my family is happy once again everything is finally falling into place!!
Wow that's huge, how do you make that much monthly?
I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
Thanks to my co-worker (Alex) who suggested Ms Maria Angelina Alexander.
She's a licensed broker in the states 🇺🇸
Ah, the big ring. Is it really such a mystery? The problem w/the BR is that it defies what is believed to be the age of the universe. On its own it might be a mystery, but, when considered in light of other.issues in cosmology, the mystery becomes less mystterious.
How about the invention of dark energy? An ad hoc creation when confronted with a model refuting observation. It was either create a hypothetical cause for their model's failure, or they admit the big bang is refuted. 😮 This hypothetical energy is entirely unknown, has.never been directly observed and some might even say it is pseudo science. Why did they create it, because it seems the universe evolved too quickly than predicted.by the model.
The Hubble Tension, to some is a crisis in cosmology. Twp methods of measuring the rate of alleged expansion do not coroborate. As well, the data suggests different parts of the unniverse are expanding at differents rates.
Three points of contemtion pertaining to the alleged expansion of the.universe.
The Hubble Tension is potentialy due to the invalidity of the Hubble Constant. CZcams channel, See The Pattern has done a great vid on this. The problem is that both methods used to measure the alleged expansion use the Hubble Constant. Bekieve it or not, the Hubble Constant is based on an untested assumption that Redshift is purely a Doppler Effect. It has never been empirically tested, its not as if we can use a measuring tape to confirm the distances the Hubble Constant gives us. In fact, one could argue that measuring two different light sources and getting two different results is perhaps the first real test for the hubble constant and it failed. If P then Q, if not Q then not P. So the universe is not expanding and mystery solved.
Black hole too big too near the alleged age of the universe? First, yes, what you know of BH is wrong. They are not tears in the hypothetical fabric of spacetime due to gravity. No, Rubin's observation of 65% of galactic mass missing was a serious failure to predict. It is a refutation of gravity being the fundamental force of celestial objects. Do I have to quote Popper's equation again? If not gravity as the fundamental force then black holes cannot be due to gravity.
In a static universe possibly infinite in age, of which 99.9% of the observable universe is plasma, those highly energetic events at the heart of a galaxy are likely plasmoids as described by W. Bostick. And because 99.9% of the ibservable universe is plasma the fundamental force is electromagnetic. Therefore objects such those he mentioned are to be expected and more will be discovered. The farther we look, more and more we will discover objects defying the false consensus belief of the age of the universe.
So say we all
We theorize that time slows when we move near light speed. How fast is the sol system moving through space and does that apply to solar systems?
I can think of 2 potential answers to the Big Ring and other gargantuan structures & objects:
1. Rogue waves of the primordial plasma. We see freak peaks and troughs in our own ocean's waves many magnitudes greater than those around it. Thus, it is not farfetched to consider the same is possible for all kinds of waves
2. The Universe is older than we think. We calculated the age of the universe using the CMB, but the CMB that we see could be not the original outburst, but instead an echo, or even from a later 'big bang'. Matter - and therefore space itself - is not distributed evenly. It could be assumed that a dense area of the universe collapsed and rebounded in its own 'big bang'
Wondering if the elements of the ring and arc are truly associated or is this potentially a perception problem, a pattern where there is none.
"Something we think we know has to be wrong." Sorry, but I actually trust the Science so this is not possible.
And science is always changing, learning, always getting better, and is still wrong and unknown on a whole lot of things. If you trust science you understand that it’s not a perfect, finished system.
science is theory, not facts
Liar
I can tell who edited some of your videos because they dont fix the sharp high frequency hiss your microphone does to your S's. Maybe their speakers dont hit those frequencies or maybe they are def to them but damn its annoying. Love your videos tho.
Maybe it's on your end. I don't hear any of that.
Big ring blew my mind
The most amazing thing about this video is that CZcams's automatic transcription system was able to decipher the first few words spoken in this video.
I knew a guy in the 1960s who did the salt water thing and had scaled his car to run on it..or so he claimed until his untimely and sus death..whixh turned out it wasnt him who died..he went into hiding but they evidently found him again when his body was discovered burned in a sus house fire...fire department said itnwas a cigarette but he didn't smoke...couldn't stand the smell.
I got through the first sentence of your comment and immediately knew that dude was dead. Funny how anyone that makes a literal world changing breakthrough suddenly gets hit by a bus, has their house burnt down (with them in it), or gets some unheard of form of un-survivable super cancer.
Fml, when will people finally accept our Age of the Universe is vastly wrong 😂
This is the dawning of the Age of the Universe, Age of the Universe....
Why did you make age of thr universe a proper noun?
@tripsaplenty1227 probably for the same reason you misspelled 'the' in your comment 😉
When you learn how to prove it 💀
Wait tell they admit that the big bang never happened and that we just have no idea what we are talking about.
Input our universe age at 52 septillion years old as a mean
Nitinol has wonderful properties that should be looked into for making engines
I love your channels but man, you gotta work on how sharp your "s" sounds when talking. I don't know if that is a mixing issue or microphone issue, I just know that it always comes across really strong when watching on any of my computers.