1/2 The Culture Show : Jon Ronson meets Malcolm Gladwell
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 10. 2013
- • The Culture Show 2013
First broadcast: 02 Oct 2013.
Malcolm Gladwell is about to publish a book. He's done it four times before, and whenever it happens huge things occur: Millions of copies get sold, world leaders take note, catchy phrases infiltrate our language and millions of us are moved by his inspiring stories and big powerful ideas.
Jon Ronson goes head to head with The Tipping Point author in his New York home to talk about his latest work. 'David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits and the Art of Battling Giants' seeks to shake our faith in what it means to have the upper hand. In it Gladwell argues we get advantage and disadvantage the wrong way round. Being dyslexic, losing a parent in childhood, being bombed, shot at, marginalized... can all be turned to good, according to his latest optimistic tome.
In this candid and revealing confrontation, one thing comes clear... Giants beware: underdogs can surprise you when they make good the advantages that stem from a traumatic start.
I listened to the audio versions. Jon actually does the audio on most of his books. It's great hearing him tell the stories. I highly recommend it.
I've spent the last week periodically watching Jon Ronson and Malcolm Gladwell videos on CZcams. It took that long for CZcams to suggest I might like a video with both of them.
Help my audiobooks have come to life and are talking to each other
Perfect music for the subject. Two quirky highly gifted authors. So different.
He's an interesting author and he cross questions Gladwell on many things - I think he's quite effective as an interviewer.
What lovely diction from Tina Brown - I could listen to her talk all day long, fascinating!
Speaks close to my heart. Haha I always kept ties n favours with the smart kids. I wasn't bad academically but so poorly disciplined and self-managed at the time.
JON RONSON = BEST AUTHOR PERIOD
Miss Brown - Thanks for giving us Malcolm Gladwell
This interviewer is a very good author in his own right. I Jon Ronson
I am glad Jon Ronson actually questions Gladwell and doesn't just accept the trite nonsense he produces.
This interviewer wrote 'The Men Who Stare At Goats' and has done all sorts of pretty rigorous journalism of his own.
watched that doc last week was wondering why his voice was so familiar
Yes that's Jon Ronson doing the interviewing.
Trying to understand every element of the construct reminds me of the highs & lows of idealism. The intellect that ore-purposed the mundane, likened almost as though routine were the enemy of though. Though being somehow pejorative. “I name that tune in 2” The syllabus.
Wish my politicial stance *conveniently* aligned with power and flattered rich people at every turn. Looks like an easy life
"I know you're nervous, you haven't Done this before?" I guess technically that's true but unless it was a horrible experience no one should want to do over, I don't think she's going to come back and try it again. even though she didn't do it then.
Ronnie is the man
In the book, Freakonomics, by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner says the drop in crime rate is directly correlated with the rate of abortion in a given city. Why ? Read the Book !
A good deal of people have taken credit for the drop in crime in New York. One big argument against the policing thing mentioned in this video is that other cities adopted those 3 strike rules and other harsher sentencing for smaller crimes. The drop in crime simply wasn't seen unanimously. I haven't seen any case contradict Levitt's finding about abortion, and actually, a similar pattern was seen in Romania.
Because more unwanted children from broken homes = more crime.
Sweet
Does anybody know the musician playing at 11:35?
But don't you want the underdog to experience the same satisfaction that the over-dog has? I am not sure if one group dominating really adds to the happiness in the world.
'the scream of the sirens was just music of the night'...
missy tina brown.
hee hee.
This interviewer sounds exactly like the Alpha Course guy
2:42 what song?
But you see, underdog will get a +, and won't get the - since they expect to lose. The overdog on the other hand will not get + as they expect to win, and if failed, will experience -. So we are looking minimize the '-', not to maximize the '+'.
Tina Brown can get it.
***** hell no, I make sweet tender love to her, I'll get her pregnant.
@@Nickademas1 Grow up, your stupid comment is juvenile - though maybe you are a juvenile?
Emily Zong But then why the f should we care about minimising anyone's negative experience? Why not be more interested in functional quality than subjective emotional quality, this sounds too utilitarian and in a negative way too. It's more interesting if there's a greater variety of winners; upsets could lead to progress and development of the field of competition; and the frequent winner needs to be prevented from becoming a smug bastard.
My own impulse is to want the underdog to win. I agree with what Gladwell says about this: we want justice and life doesn't make sense if the same lucky people keep winning all the time. Politically I'm an egalitarian and prefer a closing of the gap between two unequal people to a widening.
But then again I'm reminded of the right-libertarian way of looking at things that says we are all essentially unequal and should not expect to be able to even everything up because it curbs the brilliance of the superior and inflates the mediocrity of the inferior.
Grown Men In Funny Glasses.
13:28
Rudy Giuliani... we meet again
got enough breaking bad music in here?
0:58 Jon, don’t quite your day job. Terrible actor 🤥😂🙄
Yeah, er... Richard Branson's father was a Barrister - his mother was a former ballet dancer and air hostess - in that era, with two working parents, one in a highly paid line of work... I'm sure they weren't poor. Gladwell seems foolish here. Think I'll skip to the end of this documentary on that basis.
Did he say they were poor? I thought the point was he had dyslexia.
You should always cheer for the favourite rather than the underdog? The favourite losing is more heartbreaking than the underdog losing? Sorry Malcolm, you're great but that is complete rubbish! Then again, he contradicts himself soon after; which is baffling for those (like me) who are not deep thinkers.