I really like my KAJKA 65, it's designed to carry heavy loads, which is what I was looking for - it doesn't carry like it's heavy, whereas my Osprey couldn't handle the loads - 50 to 65 lbs. I'm small framed, 65 yrs old, and need my pack to support the weight, not my body. I only wish the hip belt could be smaller as I've tightened it as much as possible. A foam and inflatable hip belt (like Thermarest trail lite sleeping mat) would bring additional comfort and fit - yes, I'd pay additional for it as I consider my gear an investment. Safe travels and joyful memories 💖
What i take from this new upgrade is same bag with different side pockets a 1 extra piece of velcro on lombar adjustments. Completely worth 500 euros xD
It was most certainly a very typical Blorenge weather day, we did manage to see the sun briefly, but it didn't stick around for too long! No grouse this time around, although it was very windy so might not have heard them even if they were about.
Thank you. Ben is 6'3" (191cm), which as we just found out is also roughly the height of your average white rhino. We hope this entirely serious comment has been helpful.
A rain cover offers reliable weather protection and in this case also acts as a safety marker when out trekking in adverse conditions. The great thing about a rain cover is that it is entirely removeable so if you don't want to use it or think they're outdated you can simply remove it from your pack and go about your day.
It is heavier than the competition, but for something this adjustable, feature rich and durable, it can be worth the pay-off. Considering the older version came in at 3.6kg we'd say the newer model has seen a substantial makeover, and the old pack proved rather popular. Obviously there are lighter alternatives out there and they may be better suited to you, but we have a saying at Trekitt: Light is right, but not always.
Heavy and too expensive to have wood frame elements. Imagine sitting to the backpack to have a rest and breaking the wood. Will survive, but... come on...
I think we sit down with our packs differently, you'd be doing well to break the wood frame on this unless you're very aggressive with it. Fortunately the wood stays are user replaceable should you manage to break them. We also don't tend to recommend sitting directly on your pack, they're not designed for it. Leaning against it sure, sitting on it not so much.
@@trekitt this pack - sure, not designed. "FSC certified" though does not tell much as they certify practices sometimes far from nature friedly, I heard. I have had a lot of backpacks in my life, from cheap local brands to quite advanced and expensive models from Lowe Alpine, Jack Wolfskin and Tatonka but it's first time I hear they are not designed to sit on. On long journeys when you carry all with you, the backpack is the only thing you have to sit down. All my backpacks are still alive and functioning. You can't break an aluminum frame, only bend it.
This may be your experience, but we often carry a foam seatpad or lightweight camping chair when out for extended periods, products designed specifically for the task of sitting. If you haven't experienced any issues using your pack to sit on, then, by all means, continue to do so, it's just not our preferred method of sitting down outdoors. Maybe something like this will keep us both happy: www.trekitt.co.uk/rucksacks/outdoor-rucksacks/fjallraven-singi-stubben-stone-grey__40063
@@trekitt sure it is my experience and isn't it a place to share some? I do carry a sitting pad, too. Sometimes you cut it even smaller to save a few gramms (l don't ;). So no chairs. And sitting pads work poorly in snow. Hey, it's not about who is right or wrong, happy or not. I did not want to make any impressions like that on you. Don't get me wrong: FR make high quality stuff and all who can afford it, should go for it. Just make sure you pay attention to other people's concerns (experience) and make your own conclusions. All the best, folks!
It is heavier than the competition, but for something this adjustable, feature rich and durable, it can be a pay-off worth considering. Similarly featured packs from Osprey like the Atmos AG 65 come in around 2.3kg and by being smart with your other gear choices you can make up the c.700g difference. Obviously there are lighter alternatives out there and they may be better suited to you, but we have a saying at Trekitt: Light is right, but not always.
@@trekitt I appreciate your reaction. However, nowadays, for most backpackers who are not bushcraft survivalists spending weeks without any support, this backpack is way too heavy in my opinion, and I'm not alone. I see many ordinary hikers fail because of a far too heavy kit, starting with a too big and heavy backpack. The rule to be considered is 1, 1, and 1 kg: backpack, sleeping system, and tent. Of course, for the strong endurance hiker out in the bush for weeks, this backpack is fantastic.
Of course you're not alone, there's a thriving market for lightweight equipment, but there are equally as many people who may appreciate a pack more like the Kajka. Sometimes the lightest thing isn't the best for everyone or they simply want something that feels reassuringly sturdy, personal preferences play a big part in people's enjoyment of the outdoors. Exactly why we stock things like the Kajka and lightweight kit to hopefully cater to everyone and their preferences for their outdoor kit.
To "ikreisrond" : You possibly are right, although people hike the Cape Wrath Trail with various tents. Hopefully, I do not have that weather. Are your speaking out of experience? Would be interesting to share.
![[รีวิว]หนึ่งในเป้เดินป่าที่คูลที่สุดในโลก ของดีจากสวีเดน; FJALLRAVEN "KAJKA" 2024](/img/n.gif)
I really like the new design. The side pouches have gotten a much needed upgrade.
We agree, they're a solid upgrade over the last generation Kajka.
I really like my KAJKA 65, it's designed to carry heavy loads, which is what I was looking for - it doesn't carry like it's heavy, whereas my Osprey couldn't handle the loads - 50 to 65 lbs.
I'm small framed, 65 yrs old, and need my pack to support the weight, not my body.
I only wish the hip belt could be smaller as I've tightened it as much as possible. A foam and inflatable hip belt (like Thermarest trail lite sleeping mat) would bring additional comfort and fit - yes, I'd pay additional for it as I consider my gear an investment.
Safe travels and joyful memories 💖
May I ask what height you are and what size you got (S/M or M/L)?
@johanneswilhelm10 yes, I am 5'3 and purchased the small/med
What i take from this new upgrade is same bag with different side pockets a 1 extra piece of velcro on lombar adjustments. Completely worth 500 euros xD
Not if you already have the previous version. But more than welcome if you’re in the market for a new pack.
Typical Blorenge weather, hear any grouse? Nice looking pack but at 3kgs I would be looking for something a bit lighter. atb Alan
It was most certainly a very typical Blorenge weather day, we did manage to see the sun briefly, but it didn't stick around for too long! No grouse this time around, although it was very windy so might not have heard them even if they were about.
GREAT VIDEO!! how tall are you? its for reference..
Thank you. Ben is 6'3" (191cm), which as we just found out is also roughly the height of your average white rhino. We hope this entirely serious comment has been helpful.
raincover.... ? gimme a break.... in which century was that thing developed?
A rain cover offers reliable weather protection and in this case also acts as a safety marker when out trekking in adverse conditions. The great thing about a rain cover is that it is entirely removeable so if you don't want to use it or think they're outdated you can simply remove it from your pack and go about your day.
Not at that price no chance
cannot believe we are still reinventing the wheel.....
You lost me when you said 3kgs!!
It is heavier than the competition, but for something this adjustable, feature rich and durable, it can be worth the pay-off. Considering the older version came in at 3.6kg we'd say the newer model has seen a substantial makeover, and the old pack proved rather popular. Obviously there are lighter alternatives out there and they may be better suited to you, but we have a saying at Trekitt: Light is right, but not always.
Heavy and too expensive to have wood frame elements. Imagine sitting to the backpack to have a rest and breaking the wood. Will survive, but... come on...
I think we sit down with our packs differently, you'd be doing well to break the wood frame on this unless you're very aggressive with it. Fortunately the wood stays are user replaceable should you manage to break them. We also don't tend to recommend sitting directly on your pack, they're not designed for it. Leaning against it sure, sitting on it not so much.
@@trekitt this pack - sure, not designed. "FSC certified" though does not tell much as they certify practices sometimes far from nature friedly, I heard. I have had a lot of backpacks in my life, from cheap local brands to quite advanced and expensive models from Lowe Alpine, Jack Wolfskin and Tatonka but it's first time I hear they are not designed to sit on. On long journeys when you carry all with you, the backpack is the only thing you have to sit down. All my backpacks are still alive and functioning. You can't break an aluminum frame, only bend it.
This may be your experience, but we often carry a foam seatpad or lightweight camping chair when out for extended periods, products designed specifically for the task of sitting. If you haven't experienced any issues using your pack to sit on, then, by all means, continue to do so, it's just not our preferred method of sitting down outdoors.
Maybe something like this will keep us both happy:
www.trekitt.co.uk/rucksacks/outdoor-rucksacks/fjallraven-singi-stubben-stone-grey__40063
@@trekitt sure it is my experience and isn't it a place to share some? I do carry a sitting pad, too. Sometimes you cut it even smaller to save a few gramms (l don't ;). So no chairs. And sitting pads work poorly in snow.
Hey, it's not about who is right or wrong, happy or not. I did not want to make any impressions like that on you. Don't get me wrong: FR make high quality stuff and all who can afford it, should go for it. Just make sure you pay attention to other people's concerns (experience) and make your own conclusions.
All the best, folks!
Far to heavy pack to be considered
It is heavier than the competition, but for something this adjustable, feature rich and durable, it can be a pay-off worth considering. Similarly featured packs from Osprey like the Atmos AG 65 come in around 2.3kg and by being smart with your other gear choices you can make up the c.700g difference. Obviously there are lighter alternatives out there and they may be better suited to you, but we have a saying at Trekitt: Light is right, but not always.
@@trekitt I appreciate your reaction. However, nowadays, for most backpackers who are not bushcraft survivalists spending weeks without any support, this backpack is way too heavy in my opinion, and I'm not alone. I see many ordinary hikers fail because of a far too heavy kit, starting with a too big and heavy backpack. The rule to be considered is 1, 1, and 1 kg: backpack, sleeping system, and tent.
Of course, for the strong endurance hiker out in the bush for weeks, this backpack is fantastic.
Of course you're not alone, there's a thriving market for lightweight equipment, but there are equally as many people who may appreciate a pack more like the Kajka. Sometimes the lightest thing isn't the best for everyone or they simply want something that feels reassuringly sturdy, personal preferences play a big part in people's enjoyment of the outdoors. Exactly why we stock things like the Kajka and lightweight kit to hopefully cater to everyone and their preferences for their outdoor kit.
To "ikreisrond" : You possibly are right, although people hike the Cape Wrath Trail with various tents. Hopefully, I do not have that weather. Are your speaking out of experience? Would be interesting to share.