Quartz: 1.Easy repair.Can switch batteries and also sometimes the machine movement 2.Less bulky.99% of times watches are slimmer than automatic and lightweight baby!! 3.Easier to replace as they are relatively less expensive and you can add more to your collection to match your outfits.I dont care if its a rolex, a watch enthusiast will always buy a new watch. Only Con is if you stare too much at the second hand its sometimes misaligned.Although some companies like Casio get it right 99% of times
Yes it is true but everyone just doesn't want the same type of watch there are which have craft men ship and some stunning abstracts and a history and they are rare but they are useful for giving a watch to generation or if want cheap just get the fake watches. And the con is that it is heavy not that much like a half and quarter weight of that of G-Shock and less accurate timing just change the watch time after 1 or 2 months.
For more than a decade I stubbornly rejected quartz watches and revered mechanical movements. Then one day I feel into a great deal on a Citizen ProMaster Diver with it's fantastic Eco-Drive movement. I'm a complete convert now-a-days favoring Citizen Eco-Drive and Casio Tough Solar.
I was JUST about to write this exact same thing but you beat me to it, and said it better than I could. I have two 1980's Rolex DateJust (one is an extremely rare Tiffany and Co version that's pretty valuable), numerous Seiko automatics, an amazing Maratac titanium LSA automatic with a Seiko NH35, etc. And while I DO love the mechanics of them and when I wear them (rarely) i still watch the sweeping second hand like a kid watching cartoons. BUT, my most USED watches are almost ALL solar powered now. My Citizen Promaster Diver BN0150-28E Eco-Drive is my most worn watch of all time, except for maybe when I was a kid and only had a few to choose from. But I absolutely LOVE and now I wear my two G-Shock GA-B2100 3A & 1A1 a LOT and love them. And before those i wore my numerous other Tough Solar G-Shock's. The GA-B2100's are just about perfect for ME. I have the analog hands giving me a sense of time vs just digital numbers, and they have numerous other features a regular analog watch doesn't have (Dual Time, Stopwatch, Timer, 5 Alarms, Hourly Time Signal) as well as being the most LOW MAINTENANCE watches ever with the Tough Solar powering it and the automatic time sync via Bluetooth!!!!! How freaking cool is that? Truly a one watch collection. And I love how thin they are at around 12mm. But I HAVE to give a major shout out to Casio for the absolutely AMAZING GST-B300E-5A G-Steel. Yes, it's a THICK BOI, but not as bad with an FKM strap on. And I actually love the height at like 15mm for ONE reason, the buttons are super easy to push because of the technological advances Casio has made. They don't need the recessed buttons like most G-Shock's have and therefore are much easier to push. PLUS, it shows the day of the week, date AND month on the same screen. But what is such a monumental feat IMO is Casio's new micro-finishing techniques. There are areas of the dial that have micro precision that is the BEST I've EVER seen on a watch, of any price bracket. I wish I had the camera quality to show it, but there are numerous videos online and on YT that DO show the amazing precision of the texture of the dial of the GST-B300's. I'd highly recommend checking them out!!! And out of G-Shock's G-Steel models 1-5, the GST-B300 is the ONLY one with regular lug bars and distances, so ANY 20mm straight end strap will fit it perfectly. Since getting the GST-B300E-5A (the one with the SS bracelet AND negative display) back in June, I've worn it almost EVERY day. It's still a technological amazement IMO and was worth EVERY penny of the $300 i paid for it new on eBay. Probably the best deal I've ever gotten on a watch honestly!!! And the finishing of the exterior of the watch is simply amazing and gorgeous as well. Finishing on par with watches costing multiple thousands of dollars, maybe even higher. And the resin and CF marble case is really badass looking. Oh and one last mentionable. Since the GST-B300 comes with a regular lug distance of 20mm, the lugs and the lug holes are actually metal, so no worries about changing straps daily like I do!!!! I did research for a very long time before buying it, and imo it's definitely the best of the GST-B 1-5 models, but IMO, it's also the BEST G-Steel model period, even over the much more expensive MR. G and MT. G models. No, it doesn't have a sapphire crystal, but a 9H Tempered glass screen protector is $10 for 2-3 of them on Amazon, and I can attest they hold up to a LOT of abuse. My screen protector still doesn't have a scratch on it, while I can't say the same for the watch case hahaha 😂
The problem with using "history and engineering" to justify the purchase of a mechanical watch over a quartz is that the quartz movement has a short but amazing history, and the engineering in a good quartz movement is incredible! Just because there are cheap movements out there doesn't mean that the great quartz movements aren't vastly superior.
Once the watch manufacturer’s find a way to make quartz watches seconds sweep, people probably like quartz more. I am not talking bout mechaquartz or seiko kinetic and for mechaquartz I think being not common is another issue. Anyways, quartz are precise, less maintenance and everything but that jerking seconds hand ruins everything.
Totally agreed. Seiko made battery operated with sweep second hands absolutely amazing and accurate. I love it. Works like a perpetual and you don’t have to wind it❤
If Quartz watches were more expensive than Mechanical, then the Snobs would absolutely adore them and hate Mechanical. It’s 1000% Psychological. We want what others perceive is more valuable.
I love both quartz and mechanic, my favorite watch is the Vostok Amphibia because of the story, the movement and the price/quality, but also love the Tissot Prx Quartz or my Baume Mercier Riviera ref 5222 018 which are both quartz and very robust and beautiful watches, with very precise movements.
I own a G-Shock MTG-B3000 and a Grand Seiko quartz watch, and both of them are built to last a lifetime. I understand that they are both expensive timepieces, and I appreciate the craftsmanship and quality that went into making them. While I do enjoy wearing and using my automatic watches, such as the Omega Seamaster and Damasko DK32, I also recognize the practicality and convenience of quartz watches for certain activities like mountain biking and gym workouts. I appreciate the informative content in your video.
No matter how you look at it it’s all horology. however people are allowed their opinions. Rocking a solar quartz (Jack Mason) right now, gonna have to rock my Duro after watching this.
Automatic movements are super cool. Quartz movements are super accurate. They can both be jewelry and both be tools but one tool is just much more accurate and with something like eco-drive you cant really go wrong. Its cool and its accurate and will last you a very long time. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the utilitarian nature of quartz and solar.
In terms of engineering, any Quartz watch will actually beat mechanical watches. The invention of transistors alone is remarkable but using them to make more complex parts is mind blowing. But this is something you can only understand once you look deeper into how this thing actually works. A mechanical watch is easier in the sense that you can see it working and get a grasp how it keeps time. And... that sweep 😅
Misaligned second hands can be annoying. Citizen usually gets them right but not always; many Citizen models have Eco-Drive (photovoltaic cells under the dial that charge a capacitor and make a battery unnecessary) and some have radio or satellite sync to set time. I’m wearing a Certina with a thermocompensated quartz movement accurate to about ten seconds a year. Certina currently sells some watches with your choice of such a quartz movement or a self-winding Powermatic 80; the latter is more expensive.
A+. I have 2 watches that are accurate to the second year after year. One is a go anywhere beater, one is a gorgeous dual time+ Chrono + perpetual date, ...and then a LONGINES Spirit Zulu GMT that is my favorite because of the detail work and the fine autowind Swiss movement. Performance of solar powered quartz is unbeatable, though. And you CAN buy a gorgeous one. This guy is right.
as a renewable energy snob : please at least buy solar watches, to pull out the back every few year causes wearing on your watch, and your seal, at least auto can wait for 5 years and solar almost never need it unless it's extreme cases.
I have both mechanical and quartz watches in my collection. A mecha-quartz movement will give a sweeping seconds hand plus not having to adjust the time each time you want to wear it. Mecha-quartz movement embodies the best of two technologies.
I don't wear a watch every day and need something that I don't have to flap my wrist around and reset the time and date every time I put it on. Love my old Bulova Marine Star Quartz!
I am HUGE fan of Quartz and I honestly don't understand the hate for it. Why can't we all admit that watches are amazing instruments regardless of what makes them "tick" lol Personally I love a solar-powered watch. I am an outdoors guy and the fact that my watch charges from nature warms my heart.
I've just recently bought a Longines VHP GMT Quartz . Love it to death!!!❤❤❤ Got a bunch of G-Shock's , Citizen Promaster (3 of them) all quartz , a Omega Speedmaster, Fortis B42 Chronograph Cosmonaut , Doxa Sub 1200T ,all mechanical ! So who gives a flying f... what other people think ? I surely don't ! 😂😂
I'm in the market for an SMP 2254.60 - Sure I could pay more for the mechanical 2254.50, but I have no problem with the .60's quartz movement. I'm not looking forward to the cost of servicing my Speedmaster when the time comes. (Edit - that Hamilton is lovely, by the way!)
i wouldn't buy a traditional quartz watch just because i try to avoid anything that creates waste. that being said i do own a few solar quartz from citizen and seiko, but for the most part i like the concept of mechanical watches more and definitely gravitate towards them 9/10 times.
I’ve been wearing autos pretty regularly for the last few years (Seiko, Hamilton, Orient), just got a seiko 7548 and I love it. The last owner had it serviced so it’s running well below a second per day, not bad for a 43 year old watch. Compared to an skx, It’s lighter, tougher, lower maintenance, I’m not screwing and unscrewing the crown, and it doesn’t get magnetized. I even like the 1 second beat rate. I might lean towards quartz moving forward. Solar quartz would be neat too but a battery every 3 years or so isn’t really a problem in the scheme of things.
There is a time and place for the reliability and accuracy of quartz. I would take my mudmaster into hell and it would probably come out of it before I did. The gshock mudmaster is atomic so it basically loses 0 sec forever and runs indefinitely as long as brought into sunlight once every few months
I don't understand why they hate Quartz, I have a Quartz from Casio and an Automatic from Seiko, and I like both of them although I use my casio more cause is more accurate and I only use the Seiko from dressing
Watches more likely become men's fashion accessories today when everyone has a cellphone telling time. Don't let the looks of 0.01% volume to fool you, you don't have to buy some mechanical watches to pretend a luxury piece looks like Rolex. An G shock or a chunky Eco drive Citizens make life more easy and it can be a tool watch as well if you are at work.
Jesus people, just buy what you like. Whether it's a need or a want. At some point you'll just embrace it all if you like watches for what they are. If you buy things only to send a message, your collection will obviously be very different.
I guess it also comes down to how interesting a quartz watch is: yeah, "interesting" is about as subjective here as anything else involving watches, but I'm talking almost anything beyond your garden-variety three-hander on display at the corner variety store back in the day. Lots of mid- and higher-end quartz numbers from the early eighties onward were actually pretty cool (especially Seiko, but you knew I'd say that). After about a decade ignoring all things digital for over a decade, I dipped my toes back in that pool with a Casio Edifice world-timer (EQS-500 series), liked the watch *lots*, and here I am. Added a Casio ProTrek 300-series (digital!) later on, then a 90s-era Seiko SUS chrono last year, and now mulling over Casio's fairly-new A1100D retro-digital in stainless steel. The mech watches still outnumber these, but now it's a fairly interesting mix...there's that word again!
i am not too sure why ,but i reckon one of the key factors of quartz having a weaker/bad name versus mechanical watch is that they are almost cannot be service or repair when/if/should anything happens to them in say 10 to 20 years time (or probably even shorter) time frame. hence i also suggest people who buy Grand Seiko, chose a mechanical instead of their spring drive which is partial high end quartz .even if that can be repaired or service, you probably might need to send them back to japan or your own tier 1 city / capital city of your own country. whereas any mechanical grand seiko, any skilled enough watch technician can service or repair them (probably just need to buy in replacement parts)
Bought a Tissot PRX after modding a Dresskx. I never touched it again and would sooner grab cheap chinese Homage-Watches then wear it. Guess i just bought the wrong quartz, maybe i should have gone with a Casio Oceanus. Just kinda afraid it'll end up picking dust in a drawer again...
I would take the mechanical version of a dress watch over its quartz version just so I know it'll work those 3 or 4 times a year I need it for the next 20 years. My daily wearer is mechanical because that's the movement that Ball put in it but I bought it for the dial, tritium, and nice looking case.
Most of my watches are quartz because I don’t really like to set time every morning or in a few days (I’m a weirdo who always make sure the watch I wear is accurate with an atomic clock down to a second). And all my mechanical watches are hand wound so they won’t strain their parts when I am not wearing them and if I have to set time everyday anyway so winding it up only takes just a little more time.
Quartz watches are only good in the practical side of things like w Gshocks and beater watches otherwise they’re just boring. If I wanted something battery powered and tells the time then I have my phone for that
I have many quartz watches before understanding the history of mechanical watches. Gave up buying any quartz movements, except for my Longines VHP; the second hand sweep to indices is perfect and that is why u buy a quartz movement. Too bad it is discontinued, and that piece is staying in my watch case for a lifetime😊
Quartz is more accurate and doesn't cost a fortune to service every few years. Also, it is no secret that top brand watch makers charge a extortionate price for something that costs a fraction of that price.
I have multiple quartz watches and I’m replacing them all with automatic…… why?…. Because if the main spring breaks in a automatic I’ll get it fixed, but if a battery leaks in a quartz it’s not even a paperweight anymore.
A good quartz watch is underrated, but bro don't act like you're special. All the serious reviewers look at quartz watches, so no you're not the only one...at all
I will take a 1980 Omega Constellation Manhattan and the 1982 Omega Seamaster Titanium, both with quartz movements, any day over a cheap Chinese or Japanese mechanical watch.
I wear quartz watch. I also wear digital watch. It's practical and no nonsense. Solar watch is what I'm getting next. I love automatic watch. Would love to own one if it's free.
No mate you are not the only one… the time teller, just one more watch, just the watch, the mad watch collector. Just to name a few. But even they are cheaper to maintain than mechanical. When you have thirty or so quartz ones that a thousand Aud$ every two years in new batteries 🔋. So I moved to solar ones. And mechanicals of course…😊
You measure time by applying a current of electricity to a piece of rock. How is that not cool? And really high end quartz watches like the ones from GS have an accuracy of +/-1sec per YEAR!
I'm actually going to be doing a video very soon featuring my 5 favourite watches in the world and why I love them so much. My current favourite in my collection is my Orient Kamasu and my favourite in the world is probably the speedmaster broad arrow 👌
i am not too sure why ,but i reckon one of the key factors of quartz having a weaker/bad name versus mechanical watch is that they are almost cannot be service or repair when/if/should anything happens to them in say 10 to 20 years time (or probably even shorter) time frame. hence i also suggest people who buy Grand Seiko, chose a mechanical instead of their spring drive which is partial high end quartz .even if that can be repaired or service, you probably might need to send them back to japan or your own tier 1 city / capital city of your own country. whereas any mechanical grand seiko, any skilled enough watch technician can service or repair them (probably just need to buy in replacement parts)
@woonfaseng8737 It's the branding. Sinn quartz watches, the UX series are about $1500. And Rolex Osyterquartz can fetch $250,000 in an auction. And luxury mechanical movement, not the seiko NH35 stuff, need to be service by a watch tech at most ever 5 years. Now I wonder how long can smart watches last? Will Apple screw us over with new updates that will down grade the older smart watch?
Quarts have their place. That said, I personally think there's a point of diminishing return with a basic 3-hand quarts. At some dollar amount, you're paying too much for a mostly empty case. It's a little disheartening to open the back to replace the battery only to see the movement in your $300+ watch is smaller than your thumbnail, IMHO.
@@HALO-2304 well if it's a closed caseback, a tiny quartz movement is also irrelevant... I personally think that new enthusiasts are led down a mechanical road by reviewers and develop such a negative opinion on quartz, and it really shouldn't be that way.
@TopTierTicker I've noticed the few watch channels I follow have done reviews on Quartz watches and listed their pro's, but I agree, the general focus is on Autos or Mechanicals.
Man I have money but no way I'm diving with a Rolex.
G-shock all the way.
Exactly my point😂
80’s kid here love me some Casios. 😂 8 to be exact.
Same here. Think about most of Rolex models just have ETA movements mass produced each one costs less than 30$ .
Quartz:
1.Easy repair.Can switch batteries and also sometimes the machine movement
2.Less bulky.99% of times watches are slimmer than automatic and lightweight baby!!
3.Easier to replace as they are relatively less expensive and you can add more to your collection to match your outfits.I dont care if its a rolex, a watch enthusiast will always buy a new watch.
Only Con is if you stare too much at the second hand its sometimes misaligned.Although some companies like Casio get it right 99% of times
Yes it is true but everyone just doesn't want the same type of watch there are which have craft men ship and some stunning abstracts and a history and they are rare but they are useful for giving a watch to generation or if want cheap just get the fake watches. And the con is that it is heavy not that much like a half and quarter weight of that of G-Shock and less accurate timing just change the watch time after 1 or 2 months.
I have an Oceanus S100 and it's glorious. Seconds hand hits every marker perfectly!
after having owned both i have to agree, i prefer quartz
Everybody wants mechanical until A) they loose time & B) they need a service.
Meanwhile I'm here changing my own batteries 😉
For more than a decade I stubbornly rejected quartz watches and revered mechanical movements. Then one day I feel into a great deal on a Citizen ProMaster Diver with it's fantastic Eco-Drive movement. I'm a complete convert now-a-days favoring Citizen Eco-Drive and Casio Tough Solar.
That's good to hear!
By far my most-worn watch. Love the ProMaster Diver!
I was JUST about to write this exact same thing but you beat me to it, and said it better than I could.
I have two 1980's Rolex DateJust (one is an extremely rare Tiffany and Co version that's pretty valuable), numerous Seiko automatics, an amazing Maratac titanium LSA automatic with a Seiko NH35, etc. And while I DO love the mechanics of them and when I wear them (rarely) i still watch the sweeping second hand like a kid watching cartoons.
BUT, my most USED watches are almost ALL solar powered now. My Citizen Promaster Diver BN0150-28E Eco-Drive is my most worn watch of all time, except for maybe when I was a kid and only had a few to choose from.
But I absolutely LOVE and now I wear my two G-Shock GA-B2100 3A & 1A1 a LOT and love them. And before those i wore my numerous other Tough Solar G-Shock's. The GA-B2100's are just about perfect for ME. I have the analog hands giving me a sense of time vs just digital numbers, and they have numerous other features a regular analog watch doesn't have (Dual Time, Stopwatch, Timer, 5 Alarms, Hourly Time Signal) as well as being the most LOW MAINTENANCE watches ever with the Tough Solar powering it and the automatic time sync via Bluetooth!!!!! How freaking cool is that? Truly a one watch collection. And I love how thin they are at around 12mm.
But I HAVE to give a major shout out to Casio for the absolutely AMAZING GST-B300E-5A G-Steel. Yes, it's a THICK BOI, but not as bad with an FKM strap on. And I actually love the height at like 15mm for ONE reason, the buttons are super easy to push because of the technological advances Casio has made. They don't need the recessed buttons like most G-Shock's have and therefore are much easier to push. PLUS, it shows the day of the week, date AND month on the same screen.
But what is such a monumental feat IMO is Casio's new micro-finishing techniques. There are areas of the dial that have micro precision that is the BEST I've EVER seen on a watch, of any price bracket. I wish I had the camera quality to show it, but there are numerous videos online and on YT that DO show the amazing precision of the texture of the dial of the GST-B300's. I'd highly recommend checking them out!!!
And out of G-Shock's G-Steel models 1-5, the GST-B300 is the ONLY one with regular lug bars and distances, so ANY 20mm straight end strap will fit it perfectly.
Since getting the GST-B300E-5A (the one with the SS bracelet AND negative display) back in June, I've worn it almost EVERY day. It's still a technological amazement IMO and was worth EVERY penny of the $300 i paid for it new on eBay. Probably the best deal I've ever gotten on a watch honestly!!!
And the finishing of the exterior of the watch is simply amazing and gorgeous as well. Finishing on par with watches costing multiple thousands of dollars, maybe even higher. And the resin and CF marble case is really badass looking. Oh and one last mentionable. Since the GST-B300 comes with a regular lug distance of 20mm, the lugs and the lug holes are actually metal, so no worries about changing straps daily like I do!!!!
I did research for a very long time before buying it, and imo it's definitely the best of the GST-B 1-5 models, but IMO, it's also the BEST G-Steel model period, even over the much more expensive MR. G and MT. G models. No, it doesn't have a sapphire crystal, but a 9H Tempered glass screen protector is $10 for 2-3 of them on Amazon, and I can attest they hold up to a LOT of abuse. My screen protector still doesn't have a scratch on it, while I can't say the same for the watch case hahaha 😂
Man, a good Citizen Eco Drive can really change your life, I love mine!
Yep
The problem with using "history and engineering" to justify the purchase of a mechanical watch over a quartz is that the quartz movement has a short but amazing history, and the engineering in a good quartz movement is incredible! Just because there are cheap movements out there doesn't mean that the great quartz movements aren't vastly superior.
Just got myself a Grand Seiko 9F and it’s blown me away!
Once the watch manufacturer’s find a way to make quartz watches seconds sweep, people probably like quartz more. I am not talking bout mechaquartz or seiko kinetic and for mechaquartz I think being not common is another issue. Anyways, quartz are precise, less maintenance and everything but that jerking seconds hand ruins everything.
Check out the Dan henry skin diver. it features a sweeping quartz movement!
The Bulova Jet Star and the three hand Bulova precisionist both have sweeping second hands.
U could buy some vintage quartz watches that are sort of half quartz half mechanical and they sweep not tick aswell
Totally agreed. Seiko made battery operated with sweep second hands absolutely amazing and accurate. I love it. Works like a perpetual and you don’t have to wind it❤
If Quartz watches were more expensive than Mechanical, then the Snobs would absolutely adore them and hate Mechanical. It’s 1000% Psychological. We want what others perceive is more valuable.
Both quartz and mechanical have their place, but for a daily, quartz all the way especially with solar charging.
I love both quartz and mechanic, my favorite watch is the Vostok Amphibia because of the story, the movement and the price/quality, but also love the Tissot Prx Quartz or my Baume Mercier Riviera ref 5222 018 which are both quartz and very robust and beautiful watches, with very precise movements.
Vostok❤
U have a Rolex Submariner and a Vostok..
Truth is you will dive in a 5 metre swimming pool with a Vostok rather than the Rolex😂
Which colour do you have your prx mine is black
Vostok gang 😎
I own a G-Shock MTG-B3000 and a Grand Seiko quartz watch, and both of them are built to last a lifetime. I understand that they are both expensive timepieces, and I appreciate the craftsmanship and quality that went into making them. While I do enjoy wearing and using my automatic watches, such as the Omega Seamaster and Damasko DK32, I also recognize the practicality and convenience of quartz watches for certain activities like mountain biking and gym workouts. I appreciate the informative content in your video.
90% of my watches are quartz. Grab and go works beautifully.
Tissot prx is beautiful!
Yeah.. too bad that it has one of the worst misaligned quartz movement ever
No matter how you look at it it’s all horology. however people are allowed their opinions. Rocking a solar quartz (Jack Mason) right now, gonna have to rock my Duro after watching this.
Automatic movements are super cool. Quartz movements are super accurate. They can both be jewelry and both be tools but one tool is just much more accurate and with something like eco-drive you cant really go wrong. Its cool and its accurate and will last you a very long time. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the utilitarian nature of quartz and solar.
In terms of engineering, any Quartz watch will actually beat mechanical watches. The invention of transistors alone is remarkable but using them to make more complex parts is mind blowing. But this is something you can only understand once you look deeper into how this thing actually works. A mechanical watch is easier in the sense that you can see it working and get a grasp how it keeps time. And... that sweep 😅
Misaligned second hands can be annoying. Citizen usually gets them right but not always; many Citizen models have Eco-Drive (photovoltaic cells under the dial that charge a capacitor and make a battery unnecessary) and some have radio or satellite sync to set time.
I’m wearing a Certina with a thermocompensated quartz movement accurate to about ten seconds a year. Certina currently sells some watches with your choice of such a quartz movement or a self-winding Powermatic 80; the latter is more expensive.
A+. I have 2 watches that are accurate to the second year after year. One is a go anywhere beater, one is a gorgeous dual time+ Chrono + perpetual date, ...and then a LONGINES Spirit Zulu GMT that is my favorite because of the detail work and the fine autowind Swiss movement. Performance of solar powered quartz is unbeatable, though. And you CAN buy a gorgeous one. This guy is right.
I love mechanical watches, but every watch collector needs a Quartz watch to just grab and wear without changing the time or date.
Mechanical are cool but quartz is king in my opinion.
as a renewable energy snob : please at least buy solar watches, to pull out the back every few year causes wearing on your watch, and your seal, at least auto can wait for 5 years and solar almost never need it unless it's extreme cases.
I have both mechanical and quartz watches in my collection. A mecha-quartz movement will give a sweeping seconds hand plus not having to adjust the time each time you want to wear it. Mecha-quartz movement embodies the best of two technologies.
I don't wear a watch every day and need something that I don't have to flap my wrist around and reset the time and date every time I put it on. Love my old Bulova Marine Star Quartz!
I am HUGE fan of Quartz and I honestly don't understand the hate for it. Why can't we all admit that watches are amazing instruments regardless of what makes them "tick" lol Personally I love a solar-powered watch. I am an outdoors guy and the fact that my watch charges from nature warms my heart.
I love slim dress watches to the suit, so I wear quartz watches. About the sport watches - it doesn't matter 😅
I've just recently bought a Longines VHP GMT Quartz .
Love it to death!!!❤❤❤
Got a bunch of G-Shock's , Citizen Promaster (3 of them) all quartz ,
a Omega Speedmaster, Fortis B42 Chronograph Cosmonaut , Doxa Sub 1200T ,all mechanical !
So who gives a flying f... what other people think ?
I surely don't ! 😂😂
The only advantange of a mechanical movement, at least for me, it's the smoothness of the seconds hand. Otherwise the quartz is more convenient.
Quartz is superior in every way, over mechanical watches!
Specially on divers watch, you need a quartz. Every second is important.
I'm in the market for an SMP 2254.60 - Sure I could pay more for the mechanical 2254.50, but I have no problem with the .60's quartz movement.
I'm not looking forward to the cost of servicing my Speedmaster when the time comes.
(Edit - that Hamilton is lovely, by the way!)
i wouldn't buy a traditional quartz watch just because i try to avoid anything that creates waste. that being said i do own a few solar quartz from citizen and seiko, but for the most part i like the concept of mechanical watches more and definitely gravitate towards them 9/10 times.
I definitely agree but the seconds hand not hitting the second indices with precision is such a big pet peeve that I couldn’t stop thinking about.
I’ve been wearing autos pretty regularly for the last few years (Seiko, Hamilton, Orient), just got a
seiko 7548 and I love it.
The last owner had it serviced so it’s running well below a second per day, not bad for a 43 year old watch.
Compared to an skx, It’s lighter, tougher, lower maintenance, I’m not screwing and unscrewing the crown, and it doesn’t get magnetized.
I even like the 1 second beat rate. I might lean towards quartz moving forward. Solar quartz would be neat too but a battery every 3 years or so isn’t really a problem in the scheme of things.
Nah I don’t dismiss them entirely, but at the end of the day I’m dying with a mechanical watch on my wrist.
Bit morbid but dair enough 😂
There is a time and place for the reliability and accuracy of quartz. I would take my mudmaster into hell and it would probably come out of it before I did. The gshock mudmaster is atomic so it basically loses 0 sec forever and runs indefinitely as long as brought into sunlight once every few months
I don't understand why they hate Quartz, I have a Quartz from Casio and an Automatic from Seiko, and I like both of them although I use my casio more cause is more accurate and I only use the Seiko from dressing
Watches more likely become men's fashion accessories today when everyone has a cellphone telling time.
Don't let the looks of 0.01% volume to fool you, you don't have to buy some mechanical watches to pretend a luxury piece looks like Rolex.
An G shock or a chunky Eco drive Citizens make life more easy and it can be a tool watch as well if you are at work.
La magia de la horologia está en la tradición y la artesanía, en el alma que ello encierra. Los relojes de cuarzo dan la hora y ya .
Bulova precisionist movement is my favourite
And yet you sold it. Thanks for your genuine advice. Seems that TGV influence is kicking in
😆 I know right! Life wouldn't be fun without the mistakes 😂😆
Quartz is only for people who want to know what time it is (which is handy if you are dating)
Eco Drive turned me around!
I’ve tried wearing mechanical watches but my OCD kicks in and I find myself trying to fix it through out the day.
Jesus people, just buy what you like. Whether it's a need or a want. At some point you'll just embrace it all if you like watches for what they are. If you buy things only to send a message, your collection will obviously be very different.
I guess it also comes down to how interesting a quartz watch is: yeah, "interesting" is about as subjective here as anything else involving watches, but I'm talking almost anything beyond your garden-variety three-hander on display at the corner variety store back in the day. Lots of mid- and higher-end quartz numbers from the early eighties onward were actually pretty cool (especially Seiko, but you knew I'd say that). After about a decade ignoring all things digital for over a decade, I dipped my toes back in that pool with a Casio Edifice world-timer (EQS-500 series), liked the watch *lots*, and here I am. Added a Casio ProTrek 300-series (digital!) later on, then a 90s-era Seiko SUS chrono last year, and now mulling over Casio's fairly-new A1100D retro-digital in stainless steel. The mech watches still outnumber these, but now it's a fairly interesting mix...there's that word again!
i am not too sure why ,but i reckon one of the key factors of quartz having a weaker/bad name versus mechanical watch is that they are almost cannot be service or repair when/if/should anything happens to them in say 10 to 20 years time (or probably even shorter) time frame. hence i also suggest people who buy Grand Seiko, chose a mechanical instead of their spring drive which is partial high end quartz .even if that can be repaired or service, you probably might need to send them back to japan or your own tier 1 city / capital city of your own country. whereas any mechanical grand seiko, any skilled enough watch technician can service or repair them (probably just need to buy in replacement parts)
Not quite sure the seconds hand line up with the markers. I may be wrong...
It depends on the watches
They don't suck if you like to look slick on stage but you are a drummer
Bought a Tissot PRX after modding a Dresskx. I never touched it again and would sooner grab cheap chinese Homage-Watches then wear it. Guess i just bought the wrong quartz, maybe i should have gone with a Casio Oceanus. Just kinda afraid it'll end up picking dust in a drawer again...
I would take the mechanical version of a dress watch over its quartz version just so I know it'll work those 3 or 4 times a year I need it for the next 20 years. My daily wearer is mechanical because that's the movement that Ball put in it but I bought it for the dial, tritium, and nice looking case.
Most of my watches are quartz because I don’t really like to set time every morning or in a few days (I’m a weirdo who always make sure the watch I wear is accurate with an atomic clock down to a second). And all my mechanical watches are hand wound so they won’t strain their parts when I am not wearing them and if I have to set time everyday anyway so winding it up only takes just a little more time.
I prefer quartz, i dont have the patience to be winding a watch 😂
I actually was so shocked to find there is actually a perfect middle ground called spring drive I got a grand seiko immediately
Bulova Precisionist has entered the chat.
Quartz watches are only good in the practical side of things like w Gshocks and beater watches otherwise they’re just boring. If I wanted something battery powered and tells the time then I have my phone for that
I have many quartz watches before understanding the history of mechanical watches.
Gave up buying any quartz movements, except for my Longines VHP; the second hand sweep to indices is perfect and that is why u buy a quartz movement.
Too bad it is discontinued, and that piece is staying in my watch case for a lifetime😊
That Hamilton is just kack. You can wear it. I'll keep my Rolexes and A.P.s.
I believe quartz digital watches (Casio) are great but for analog I love seeing that seconds hand not just jump every tick
That's like saying "oh I hate the modern sports cars. Give me the good old Bullock cart"
Quartz is more accurate and doesn't cost a fortune to service every few years. Also, it is no secret that top brand watch makers charge a extortionate price for something that costs a fraction of that price.
Quartz is superior in literally every way
Every well rounded collection should have at least 1 quartz watch, as a good grab and go.
Can I have sweeping hand in a quartz watch?
I have multiple quartz watches and I’m replacing them all with automatic…… why?…. Because if the main spring breaks in a automatic I’ll get it fixed, but if a battery leaks in a quartz it’s not even a paperweight anymore.
Just a pity most quartz watches never hits the markers. A big no for me and most are very cheaply made.
A good quartz watch is underrated, but bro don't act like you're special. All the serious reviewers look at quartz watches, so no you're not the only one...at all
I will take a 1980 Omega Constellation Manhattan and the 1982 Omega Seamaster Titanium, both with quartz movements, any day over a cheap Chinese or Japanese mechanical watch.
I wear quartz watch. I also wear digital watch. It's practical and no nonsense. Solar watch is what I'm getting next. I love automatic watch. Would love to own one if it's free.
Buy second hand and you’ll get it for really cheap
@@brazxyygood idea would love to buy 1 if price is right.
No mate you are not the only one… the time teller, just one more watch, just the watch, the mad watch collector. Just to name a few. But even they are cheaper to maintain than mechanical. When you have thirty or so quartz ones that a thousand Aud$ every two years in new batteries 🔋. So I moved to solar ones. And mechanicals of course…😊
A new battery is £3 😆 and it takes around 3 minutes to swap it over.
@@TopTierTicker $25 Aussie dollars at the shoe maker
You measure time by applying a current of electricity to a piece of rock. How is that not cool? And really high end quartz watches like the ones from GS have an accuracy of +/-1sec per YEAR!
Which watch CZcamsr only reccomend mechanical watches please share
Quartz are trash. Always dead when I go to retrieve one no soul, and boring period.
“Attention to detail” the seconds hand don’t align to the markers…
Don't knock some of the quartz movements, some are done in house and of very high quality
I just like weight of a mechanical watch. Nothing wrong with quartz just too light for me.
Is that hamilton 37mm?
cartier tank is quartz
Just get a spring drive. You get both.
I need quartz for my job
Just get an Apple Watch Ultra😮
What is your favourite watch ⌚️ mate
I'm actually going to be doing a video very soon featuring my 5 favourite watches in the world and why I love them so much.
My current favourite in my collection is my Orient Kamasu and my favourite in the world is probably the speedmaster broad arrow 👌
Oris big crown pointer date 7551
imma god damn say it,
quartz is more interesting in how it works than spinny thing go spinny to 1 second
Like comparing a Model T Ford with a new Lexus. Quartz is so much superior.
You mean a golf cart to a Lexus and quartz is the golf cart, right?
I like my quartz watches, but only if they're Casios 😅
Nope. Just nope. Can spin it any way you want. Just don't want a quartz watch.
Right seems pointless, feels like a buying a fake watch
Go mechaquartz
Mechanical watches are for snobs. A cheap quartz watch is way better than a cheap mechanical movement. (koff koff, ETA system 51)
i am not too sure why ,but i reckon one of the key factors of quartz having a weaker/bad name versus mechanical watch is that they are almost cannot be service or repair when/if/should anything happens to them in say 10 to 20 years time (or probably even shorter) time frame. hence i also suggest people who buy Grand Seiko, chose a mechanical instead of their spring drive which is partial high end quartz .even if that can be repaired or service, you probably might need to send them back to japan or your own tier 1 city / capital city of your own country. whereas any mechanical grand seiko, any skilled enough watch technician can service or repair them (probably just need to buy in replacement parts)
@woonfaseng8737 It's the branding. Sinn quartz watches, the UX series are about $1500. And Rolex Osyterquartz can fetch $250,000 in an auction. And luxury mechanical movement, not the seiko NH35 stuff, need to be service by a watch tech at most ever 5 years.
Now I wonder how long can smart watches last? Will Apple screw us over with new updates that will down grade the older smart watch?
Quartz is great
er casio
It's like everyone in the class is good except who topped the exam. What the heck!!
Unless the quartz has a sweeping second hand, I'm not interested 😅
I just won't pay premium pricing for a machine made quartz watch.
Mechanical and automatic are two different things.
The term 'mechanical' covers both manual wind and automatic watches. It's often used to describe manual wind only, but it does actually mean both.
Quarts have their place. That said, I personally think there's a point of diminishing return with a basic 3-hand quarts. At some dollar amount, you're paying too much for a mostly empty case. It's a little disheartening to open the back to replace the battery only to see the movement in your $300+ watch is smaller than your thumbnail, IMHO.
I also think opening up a 2k watch and seeing a standard undecorated ETA is dissapoiting.
Diminishing returns is the key word in watch collecting.
@TopTierTicker If it's a closed caseback, a decorated movement is a moot point, but I get it.
@@HALO-2304 well if it's a closed caseback, a tiny quartz movement is also irrelevant... I personally think that new enthusiasts are led down a mechanical road by reviewers and develop such a negative opinion on quartz, and it really shouldn't be that way.
@TopTierTicker I've noticed the few watch channels I follow have done reviews on Quartz watches and listed their pro's, but I agree, the general focus is on Autos or Mechanicals.